QLDQCA
R v Johnston [2002] QCA 74
[2002] QCA 74
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2002-03-15|Before: Davies and Williams JJA and Douglas JSeparate, reasons for judgment of each member of the Court each concurring as to the order, made
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2002-03-15
Before
Davies and Williams JJA and Douglas JSeparate, reasons for judgment of each member of the Court each concurring as to the order, made
Catchwords
- CRIMINAL LAW - ANCILLARY LIABILITY - COMPLICITY - STATUTORY PROVISIONS -
- AIDING, ABETTING, COUNSELLING OR PROCURING - where victim
- was driven to remote
- bushland - where grievous bodily harm was done to the victim - whether appellant
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
CRIMINAL LAW - ANCILLARY LIABILITY - COMPLICITY - STATUTORY PROVISIONS -AIDING, ABETTING, COUNSELLING OR PROCURING - where victimwas driven to remotebushland - where grievous bodily harm was done to the victim - whether appellantlured the victim into the carfor the purpose of enabling or aiding others toperform an act which caused grievous bodily harmCRIMINAL LAW - ANCILLARYLIABILITY - COMPLICITY - STATUTORY PROVISIONS - CODE PROVISIONS - whether theappellant was a party to theoffence under s 7(1)(b) or s 8 of the CriminalCode (Qld)CRIMINAL LAW - ANCILLARY LIABILITY - COMPLICITY - COMMONPURPOSE - CODE PROVISIONS - whether appellant formed a common intention withothers to do serious harm to the victimCRIMINAL LAW - EVIDENCE -JUDICIAL DISCRETION TO ADMIT OR EXCLUDE EVIDENCE - PREJUDICIAL EVIDENCE -GENERALLY - evidence indicatedappellant's involvement in plan to do seriousharm to the victim - whether this evidence had no or very limited probativevalue andsubstantial prejudicial effect