QLDQCA

R v Irving [2001] QCA 472

[2001] QCA 472

Court of Appeal (Qld)|2001-11-02|Before: McPherson JA, Ambrose and Cullinane JJSeparate reasons for judgment of, each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made.

View original source

General information, not legal advice.

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Court of Appeal (Qld)

Decision date

2001-11-02

Before

McPherson JA, Ambrose and Cullinane JJSeparate reasons for judgment of, each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made.

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
– APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE
– APPEAL BY
CONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION– APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE– APPEAL BYCONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED– GENERALLY – whereapplicant committed armed robbery whilst onparole – whether the applicant was convicted of a serious violent offence–whether the sentence of 9 years was manifestlyexcessiveCorrective Services Act 1988 (Qld), s190Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld), s 156A, s 161CRv Booth [2001] 1 Qd R 393, consideredR v Powderham [2001] QCA429, consideredR v Shillingsworth [2001] QCA 172, considered

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

R

Respondent/Defendant:

Irving [2001] QCA 472