Court of Appeal (Qld)|2001-11-02|Before: McPherson JA, Ambrose and Cullinane JJSeparate reasons for judgment of, each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made.

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Court of Appeal (Qld)

Decision date

2001-11-02

Before

McPherson JA, Ambrose and Cullinane JJSeparate reasons for judgment of, each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made.

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
– APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE
– APPEAL BY
CONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION– APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE– APPEAL BYCONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED– GENERALLY – whereapplicant committed armed robbery whilst onparole – whether the applicant was convicted of a serious violent offence–whether the sentence of 9 years was manifestlyexcessiveCorrective Services Act 1988 (Qld), s190Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld), s 156A, s 161CRv Booth [2001] 1 Qd R 393, consideredR v Powderham [2001] QCA429, consideredR v Shillingsworth [2001] QCA 172, considered

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

# R

Respondent/Defendant:

Irving \[2001\] QCA 472