QLDQCA

R v Hine [2002] QCA 212

[2002] QCA 212

Court of Appeal (Qld)|2002-06-21|Before: McPherson JA, Mackenzie and Atkinson JJ, Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, McPherson JA and, Mackenzie J concurring as to the orders made, Atkinson, J dissenting

View original source

General information, not legal advice.

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Court of Appeal (Qld)

Decision date

2002-06-21

Before

McPherson JA, Mackenzie and Atkinson JJ, Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, McPherson JA and, Mackenzie J concurring as to the orders made

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
– APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – APPEAL BY CONVICTED
PERSONS –
APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN GRANTED – where appellant

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Catchwords

CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION– APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – APPEAL BY CONVICTEDPERSONS –APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN GRANTED – where appellantconvicted of dangerous driving causinggrievous bodily harm with a circumstanceof aggravation – whether sentence imposed manifestly excessivePenalties & Sentences Act, s 9(2)(c), s 9(2)(e)Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46(1984) 154 CLR 606, appliedR v Byrne, CANo 3 of 1995, consideredR v Cusackex parte Attorney-General [2000]QCA 239,CA No 90 of 2000, 16 June 2000, consideredR v de Rooy, CA No105 of 1991, 1 August 1991, consideredR v McCormick [2000] QCA 522,consideredR v Melanoex parte Attorney-General [1994] QCA 523(1995) 2 Qd R 186,consideredR v Purcellex parte Attorney-General, CA No 192 of 1999,consideredR v Rowley, CA No 240 of 1998, 26 August 1998,

R v Hine [2002] QCA 212

At a glance

Court

Decision date

Before

Catchwords

Source

Catchwords

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

Parties

Cases Cited (2)