QLDQCA
R v E; ex parte Attorney-General of Qld [2002] QCA 417
[2002] QCA 417
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2002-10-11|Before: Williams and Jerrard JJA and Helman JSeparate, reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the, orders made
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2002-10-11
Before
Williams and Jerrard JJA and Helman JSeparate, reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the, orders made
Catchwords
- CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION
- – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE
- – APPEAL BY
- ATTORNEY-GENERAL OR OTHER CROWN LAW OFFICER – APPLICATIONS TO INCREASE
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION– APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE– APPEAL BYATTORNEY-GENERAL OR OTHER CROWN LAW OFFICER – APPLICATIONS TO INCREASESENTENCE – OFFENCES AGAINSTTHE PERSON - where respondent sentenced as ajuvenile after pleading guilty to two counts of rape, four counts of attemptedrapeand one of torture – where respondent received two years’detention on the rape counts and 12 months detention on theattempted rape andtorture counts – whether the sentence was manifestly inadequate -consideration of R v Aex parte A-G (Qld) [2001] QCA 542 and R vRoelandts [2002] QCA 254Juvenile Justice Act 1992 (Qld), s 4(a), s 188, s 189R v GDP (1991) 53 A Crim R 112, consideredR v Aex parte A-G(Qld) [2001] QCA 542, CA 275 of 2001, 28 November 2001, consideredR vB (a child) (1995) 82 A Crim R 234, considered R v C (a child)