R v Banhelyi [2011] QCA 268
[2011] QCA 268
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2011-10-05
Before
Keane J, McMeekin J, Chesterman JA, White JA, Meekin J
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (9 paragraphs)
The application to call fresh evidence is made against a background of a contention that the prosecution were in possession of a statement of the eyewitness but his existence was not revealed to the applicant.
The Crown contend that the application to lead fresh evidence should be left to any appeal, by which time a record book will be available to put the evidence in context and the prosecution in possession of instructions as to whether a statement of the witness was indeed in the possession of the police. That seems appropriate. Given the obligation on the prosecution imposed by section 590AB(2)(b) of the Criminal Code to make disclosure of any such eyewitness evidence, the applicant would have a strong case that he is yet to have a trial according to law if his claim is made out. The Queen v Hau [2009] QCA 167 at paragraph 13 per Justice Keane. It is important that the prosecution's position be made clear.