Peter Vogel Instruments Pty Ltd v Fairlight.Au Pty Ltd

1. The respondents pay 50% of the appellant's costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

THE COURT: 1 In the course of delivering judgment and making orders in relation to this appeal we expressed our preliminary view that, in light of the outcome, the respondents should pay 50% of the appellant's costs of the appeal; Peter Vogel Instruments Pty Ltd v Fairlight.Au Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 172 at [88]. As the parties had not addressed us on the question of costs at the hearing of the appeal, we invited them to provide short written submissions in relation to our preliminary view. 2 The parties have now provided their submissions. It is accepted by all that it is appropriate for the appellant to receive 50% of its costs of the appeal, but the respondents submit that the first respondent only should be obliged to pay those costs. The second respondent is the parent company of the first respondent. The respondents submit that the appellant was successful in its appeal only against the first respondent. 3 Notwithstanding this submission, it is our view that the order for costs should be against both respondents. Both were parties to the appeal, both appeared at the hearing and both jointly opposed the appeal. No attempt was made at any stage during the appeal to differentiate between any submissions made by one respondent or the other. Further, we have upheld ground 5 of the appeal which concerned alleged copyright infringement. That ground affects both respondents. In that context it is not correct that the appellant was successful only against the first respondent. 4 Accordingly, we order that the respondents pay 50% of the appellant's costs of the appeal. I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justices Besanko, Edelman and Burley.