Various other fabricated pieces of evidence he included alongside the respondent's, but which
were maliciously rejected by the registry.
Once Bastard provide all these documents , I am happy to proceed for cost or victacious or anything else, however Bastard must provide these first. These are already served to dependents. Sharing with rest of the registries to let them know the psychopath who fabricate his own hearing transcripts.
C.3 Consideration
- As is evident from the above, reference to only a handful of Mr Nasir's emails to the Registry suggests he has published allegations that: (1) the Court or a particular judge (or judges) are corrupt; (2) a particular judge (or judges) are dishonest or have engaged in fraud; (3) a particular judge (or judges) are partial or biased; and (4) a particular judge (or judges) harbour improper motives. These allegations are, needless to say, very serious and entirely lacking in any factual foundation.
- However, I do not consider at present any order to protect the administration of justice should be made to take these matters further.
- First, Mr Nasir is defending extant New South Wales criminal proceedings which involve allegations as to the making of serious threats to Registry staff. It is doubtful whether commencing contempt proceedings against Mr Nasir would be utile in circumstances where the communications the subject of the criminal proceedings may overlap with communications the subject of any contempt proceedings, or in circumstances where such an order may interfere in some way with the ongoing criminal proceedings.
- Secondly, as I have noted earlier, I have some concerns about Mr Nasir's present condition. This has been exacerbated by emails received as recently as yesterday by the Registry which I will not detail, but which cause me to question his stability. This may also be a matter which is canvassed in the context of the ongoing criminal proceedings.
- Thirdly, even if pursuing contempt proceedings was rendered necessary at some later time, I am not satisfied that this case presently warrants the intervention of the Court by referring the matter to the Principal Registrar for the institution of contempt proceedings.
- I hasten to add that this is not to foreclose the possibility that it may be necessary to make such an order in the future, including depending upon the progress and outcome of the existing criminal proceedings. Mr Nasir's concerning actions, which have continued right up until the delivery of this judgment, may later warrant the intervention of the Court to refer the matter to the Principal Registrar to bring a proceeding directed to the end of protecting the authority of the judicial system and public confidence in the administration of justice.
D CONCLUSION AND ORDERS
- For the above reasons, I make the following order:
- Pursuant to s 37AO(2)(b) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (FCA Act), Mr Sajjad Nasir be prohibited from instituting proceedings in this Court without making an application for leave to institute proceedings in accordance with s 37AR of the FCA Act.
I certify that the preceding ninety (90) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Justice Lee.
Associate:
Dated: 15 October 2024