Linfox Transport (Australia) Pty Ltd & Anor v Toohey [2004] VSCA 122
[2004] VSCA 122
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Vic)
Decision date
2004-06-11
Before
BATT and EAMES, JJ.A.
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (19 paragraphs)
- For the reasons discussed above, it follows that I also agree that this is a very appropriate case for the hearing of the appeal to be expedited.
- There has been discussion on the question of costs. Both sides agree that whatever costs are awarded should be costs in the appeal and we think that right. Mr Solomon sought that only his client's costs be costs in the appeal, but we think, for reasons indicated in argument, and because the necessity for today's hearing stems from uncertainty about the legislation itself, that the costs of both sides should be costs in the appeal.
- The orders of the court will therefore be as follows.