Liistro & Ors v Moreland CC [2009] VCAT 1795
[2009] VCAT 1795
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
Decision date
2009-08-30
Before
Mr J
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (10 paragraphs)
- For the reasons I have outlined previously this proposal makes a significant contribution to the achievement of planning objectives. This outcome should not be prejudiced by a requirement to make provision for car parking in a locality where access to public transport is readily available.
- The decision guidelines at Clause 52.06-1 identify a range of matters which need to be considered prior to permitting a car parking reduction. Having regard to the availability of public transport in the area, the availability of parking during large parts of the week, and the car parking deficiency associated with the existing use of the land[7], the proposed provision of parking is satisfactory.
- It follows from the above reasons that it is my conclusion that the decision of the responsible authority should be affirmed and a permit be granted.
- The permit will include the conditions contained in the notice of decision to grant a Permit issued by the responsible authority.