© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2004] FCA 165
Federal Court of Australia
2004-02-16
Whitlam J
Original judgment source is linked above.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Leave be given to Mark Dengate to appear for the applicants on the hearing of the motion by the State Minister (Minister Assisting the Minister for Natural Resources (Lands)). 2. The name of the State Minister who is a respondent to these proceedings pursuant to s 84(4) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and who was previously known as the Minister for Land and Water Conversation be changed to the Minister Assisting the Minister for Natural Resources (Lands). 3. (i) The questions specified as separate questions in order 2 made by Whitlam J on 18 July 2001 and varied in orders made 7 January 2002 be answered in the way set out in Schedule 1 to this order; (ii) Native title does not exist in the determination area as set out in Schedule 2; (iii) No compensation is payable to the applicants in relation to the determination 4. The compensation application is otherwise dismissed.
BETWEEN: DOROTHY LAWSON, PHILLIP LAWSON, NOEL JOHNSON, SHEILA KIRBY AND IRENE MITCHELL
AND: MINISTER FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND OTHERS
NG 6167 of 1998 BETWEEN: DOROTHY LAWSON AND PHILLIP LAWSON
AND: MINISTER FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND OTHERS
Answer: Yes. Extinguishment of native title in the entire claim area 4. Question: Was there, by notification in the NSW Government Gazette on 1 December 1922, under the Public Works Act 1912 (NSW), an appropriation of so much of the area covered by the Lake Victoria Compensation Application that was Crown land and the resumption of so much of the area covered by the application that was not Crown land and the vesting of such acquired lands for an estate in fee simple in the State of South Australia? Answer: Yes. 5. Question: If the answer to question 4 is yes - is the act described in question 4 a 'previous exclusive possession act' within the meaning of s 23B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and s 20 of the Native Title (New South Wales) Act 1994 (NSW)? Answer: Yes. Other extinguishment 6. Question: Was there a statutory vesting of an estate in fee simple in the State of South Australia by operation of s 18 of the River Murray Waters Act 1915 (NSW) in respect of a portion of the area covered by the Lake Victoria Compensation Application?
Answer: It is inappropriate to answer this question.
BETWEEN: DOROTHY LAWSON, PHILLIP LAWSON, NOEL JOHNSON, SHEILA KIRBY AND IRENE MITCHELL
AND: MINISTER FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND OTHERS
NG 6167 of 1998 BETWEEN: DOROTHY LAWSON AND PHILLIP LAWSON
AND: MINISTER FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND OTHERS
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 Today's orders are made in consequence of the reasons for judgment published on 17 October 2003. As those reasons noted, at the hearing of the questions determined in those proceedings the applicants were absent. When those reasons were published the matter was stood over for the purpose of making orders to give effect to those reasons. Subsequently, on 26 November 2003, a notice of motion was filed by the Minister assisting the Minister for Natural Resources (Lands) as the State Minister under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ('the Minister') for each of the two matters which answered the preliminary questions in the terms that I proposed, and which disposed of the applications in consequence of those orders as O 29 r 4 of the Federal Court Rules contemplates. Affidavits in support of each notice of motion, made by solicitors from the New South Wales Crown Solicitor's office, indicated that steps had been taken to draw the proposed notices of motion and the proposed orders to the attention of the parties. 2 The hearing was fixed for today to suit all parties. A video-link connection was made the Magistrates' Court at Mildura to allow the applicants to appear in person. Upon the matter being called on for hearing, Mrs Dorothy Lawson appeared in person and mentioned the matter on behalf of the other applicants. Mrs Lawson also announced that she and all the other applicants wanted Mark Dengate to be given leave to represent them. No objection was taken by any party to Mr Dengate being granted leave to appear today on the hearing of the motions. In the peculiar circumstances and for that limited purpose, Mr Dengate was given leave to appear for the applicants. Mr Dengate very courteously and politely dealt with some points he wished to make about my earlier reasons for judgment, and he has addressed the topic of the orders that ought to be made. 3 I am satisfied that the orders proposed by the Minister give effect to the reasons for judgment and effectively dispose of these proceedings. The applicants, of course, will have their right of appeal in respect of what are now final orders in the proceedings.
I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Whitlam.
Associate: Dated: 3 March 2004 Appearances Applicants Mr Dengate, with leave NSW Minister Assisting the Minister for Natural Resources (Lands) S B Lloyd instructed by I V Knight, Crown Solicitor Western Murray Irrigation Ltd J A Waters, instructed by Suzanna Sheed & Associates National Farmers Association Mr M K Hughes of Bruce and Stewart New South Wales Native Title Services Ltd Ms B J Guthrie of Chalk & Fitzgerald
Date of hearing: 16 February 2004
Date of judgment: 16 February 2004
Lawson
Minister for Land & Water Conservation