Hassell Pty Ltd v Warringah Shire Council
[2000] NSWLEC 49
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Land and Environment Court (NSW)
Decision date
1997-11-18
Before
Sheahan J, Talbot J, Cripps J
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (410 paragraphs)
- The applicant's position, which was accepted by the court previously, was based on the " 8 part test ", required by s 5A of the EPA Act. In relation to the subject application Dr Braithwaite states that the " 8 part test " was used as the basis for his current report and that his conclusions did not change.
- Since the previous hearing no further surveys have been undertaken on the site or in the locality. From the previous surveys only one location (No.6) was close to or located within lot 26. Having previously found that the loss of some examples of the Red Crowned Toadlet is likely to occur without significantly impacting on the species, the potential loss in this location is acceptable. This conclusion is based on the fact that the toadlet is still located in this position; a fact that was not proven and possibly unlikely because of their migratory nature and the activity which has been carried out on the site between the two hearings.