United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

District of Columbia

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

Harman v Horne [2001] QCA 233 - QCA 2001 case summary — Zoe

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2001] QCA 233

QLDQCA

Harman v Horne [2001] QCA 233

[2001] QCA 233

Court of Appeal (Qld)|2001-06-15|Before: Pherson JA, Muir J, Atkinson J

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Court of Appeal (Qld)

Decision date

2001-06-15

Before

Pherson JA, Muir J, Atkinson J

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (4 paragraphs)

[1]

[2]

McPHERSON JA: We will grant an adjournment to a date to be fixed and we will also make the following order:

[3]

Unless within seven days the solicitor Tony Bailey furnish a written undertaking to the Registrar or his deputy not to charge the applicant client for the costs of and incidental to this adjournment, order that he show cause in writing why he should not bear those costs.

[4]

I also direct the Registrar to furnish a copy of this order to the applicant client.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

# Harman

Respondent/Defendant:

Horne \[2001\] QCA 233