QLDQCA
Gray v Hopcroft & Anor [2000] QCA 144
[2000] QCA 144
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2000-04-28|Before: Thomas JA, Ambrose and Helman JJSeparate reasons for judgment of each, member of the court, each concurring as to the orders made
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2000-04-28
Before
Thomas JA, Ambrose and Helman JJSeparate reasons for judgment of each, member of the court, each concurring as to the orders made
Catchwords
- PROCEDURE – COSTS – DEPARTING FROM THE GENERAL RULE –
- OTHER CONDUCT – where concession made at various stages
- of application
- PROCEDURE – QUEENSLAND – PRACTICE UNDER RULES OF COURT
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
PROCEDURE – COSTS – DEPARTING FROM THE GENERAL RULE –OTHER CONDUCT – where concession made at various stagesof applicationPROCEDURE – QUEENSLAND – PRACTICE UNDER RULES OF COURT– STAYING PROCEEDINGS – where applicant with a disabilityresidingin North Queensland refused to attend examination by psychiatrist in Brisbane– whether respondent required to providea panel of examiners in NorthQueensland APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – INTERFERENCE WITH DISCRETION OFCOURT BELOW – OTHER MATTERS – where exercise of discretionbychamber judge in an interlocutory matterAdam P. Brown Male FashionsPty Ltd v Phillip Morris Inc and Anor [1981] HCA 39(1981) 148 CLR 170,consideredLawrence v Oil Drilling and Exploration (Qld) Pty Ltd vAnor (1967) QWN 4, considered
Judgment
Judgment text is temporarily unavailable while the source document is re-fetched.