7(2) The modes of procedure and forms of process of the Supreme Court of the State or Territory in which the judgment or order is sought to be enforced shall be available and followed in the Court so far as is practicable mutatis mutandis for the enforcement of orders of the Court."
5 In Guthrie v Robertson (1987) 13 FCR 336 I ordered that the Federal Court could, by reason of s 53 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 and O 37 r 7 of the Federal Court Rules, exercise the power in O 47 r 33 of the Rules of the Supreme Court (Qld) to order the attendance of a defendant, and oral examination concerning his means of satisfying the judgment.
6 On 1 July 1999 the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules came into operation, providing for a new set of rules in the Supreme, District and Magistrates Courts of Queensland. Those rules have replaced the oral hearing procedure with a new process involving the holding of an enforcement hearing.
7 Rule 807(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules provides:
"807(1) At any time after a money order is made, an enforcement creditor or an enforcement debtor may, without notice to another party, apply to the court, including the court as constituted by a registrar, for an enforcement hearing."
8 Rule 793 defines an "enforcement creditor" as, inter alia, "a person entitled to enforce an order for the payment of money..." and an "enforcement debtor" is defined to mean "a person required to pay money under an order". In this particular case Australia Pacific Trading Proprietary Limited is an enforcement debtor as so defined and Newnham Trucking Proprietary Limited and Graeme Charles Newnham are enforcement creditors as defined.
9 The money order is defined in Schedule 4 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules to have the same meaning as provided in Schedule 2 of the Supreme Court of Queensland Act (1991). That definition is:
"…an order of the court, or part of an order of the court, for the payment of an amount, including an amount for damages, whether or not the amount is or includes an amount for interest or costs."
The order of the Court of 12 April 1991 is such a money order.
10 Rule 808(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules provides:
"A court may, by an enforcement hearing summons in the approved form, require a person mentioned in rule 807(3), (4) or (5) to attend before the court at a stated time and place to give information and answer questions, and produce stated documents or things."
And r 807(4) provides that:
"If the enforcement debtor is a corporation, the summons may be directed to an officer of the corporation."
11 Joel Vivien Keune is a director and secretary of the enforcement debtor.
12 Rule 809 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules provides:
"809(1) By an enforcement hearing summons, a court may also require completion of a statement on oath of an enforcement debtor's financial position in the approved form by -