NICHOLAS J
1 Before me is an application brought by the applicant seeking orders under s 115A of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ("the Act") requiring the respondents, each of which is a carriage service provider, to take reasonable steps to disable access to various online locations ("the target online locations"). The target online locations, identified by reference to their domain name and IP address, are out in a schedule to the applicant's amended originating application. The orders sought by the applicant are to the same general effect as those were made in a previous proceeding brought by it under s 115A.
2 There are 49 respondents, each of which is a carriage service provider and a member of Telstra, Optus, Vocus (formerly M2) or TPG groups. I am satisfied that each of the respondents has been served with copies of both the originating application and the amended originating application. I am also satisfied that each of the respondents either consents to, or does not oppose, the making of the orders sought by the applicant.
3 The evidence relied upon by the applicant consists of affidavits made by Ms Sheenal Singh of Minter Ellison, the solicitors for the applicant, and Ms Claire Southey, the applicant's Head of Content Protection Technology.
4 Ms Singh gives evidence concerning her investigations into each of the target online locations including their location and content, copyright material (including copyright material owned by the applicant) accessible at or via the target online locations, and her attempts to communicate with the website operators.
5 Ms Southey, who has expertise in information technology, gives evidence as to the subsistence and ownership of copyright in various television programs, the location of the target online locations, and the technology used or made available at the target online locations.
6 There are 28 target online locations. These can be grouped into 15 different categories consisting of a primary domain name and various secondary domain names at which the same content can be found. For example, category 1 consists of five domain names that operate under the "HDO" name. The primary site is found at the hdo.to domain name, and four secondary sites at locations the names of which also include the HDO name. This categorisation of primary and secondary locations is based on what appeared, at a particular time, to be the main or most popular domain name for the online location to which the other sites with similar domain names redirect.
7 The 15 categories of target online locations are:
8 Section 115A(1) and (2) of the Act provide:
(1) The Federal Court of Australia may, on application by the owner of a copyright, grant an injunction referred to in subsection (2) if the Court is satisfied that:
(a) a carriage service provider provides access to an online location outside Australia; and
(b) the online location infringes, or facilitates an infringement of, the copyright; and
(c) the primary purpose of the online location is to infringe, or to facilitate the infringement of, copyright (whether or not in Australia).
(2) The injunction is to require the carriage service provider to take reasonable steps to disable access to the online location.
9 The operation of s 115A has been considered in the number of cases including, Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2016) 248 FCR 178 ("Roadshow"), Foxtel Management Pty Limited v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2017) 126 IPR 579, Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2017) 126 IPR 219 and Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited [2017] FCA 965. The orders originally made in Roadshow in Proceeding NSD 241 of 2016 (in which the present applicant was also the applicant) were amended on 21 December 2017 to modify the definition of "Target Online Locations". The orders sought by the applicant in this proceeding incorporate a definition of "Target Online Locations" to the same effect.
10 The applicant has taken reasonable steps to determine the identity and address of the operator of each of the target online locations. With one exception, Ms Singh's communications using the contact information associated with the target online locations received either no or no substantive reply. The operator of the target online location with the domain name 1Movies did respond to an email from Ms Singh to advise her that the website does not host any of the content offered on its server. Of course, that is no answer to the allegation that the website facilitates the infringement of copyright.
11 In my view the applicant has taken reasonable steps to notify the operators of the target online locations of this application and it is appropriate to make an order dispensing with the requirement to give notice in accordance with s 115A(4)(b) to the extent that such notice has not already been given.
12 I am satisfied that each of the target online locations allows users to access audio-visual material consisting of cinematograph films using either torrent technology or streaming technology that enables users to access and view such material on devices connected to the internet. Each of the target online locations facilitates the download (either directly or via other websites to which they provide links) of many well-known commercially released motion pictures and television programs. Some of these were released or broadcast for the first time only recently. The nature of the content, and the manner in which it is made available to users, including the fact that it is delivered free of charge, strongly suggests that such material is being made available online without the licence of the owners of the copyright in such material.
13 Most of the target online locations provide internet users with a browsable and/or searchable index or directory of audio-visual content from which the user can make a selection, and categorises its index of audio-visual content by reference the title such as "Movies" and "TV".
14 One of the target online locations, torrents.me, allows users to search for and download torrent files and, in addition, provides users with an index of sites from which a user can access other torrent files. The index of proxy sites found at torrents.me includes links to many proxies for other well-known sites that infringe or facilitate the infringement of copyright in audio-visual websites including the Pirate Bay.
15 I am satisfied that the applicant is an owner of copyright in the cinematograph films comprising each episode of the television series known as Wentworth, Season 3 ("Wentworth"). Copyright notices appearing on all such episodes identify the applicant as a copyright owner. I am also satisfied that each of the target online locations either infringes or facilitates the infringement of the applicant's copyright in one or more episodes of Wentworth: see Roadshow at [42]-]47].
16 The evidence includes the results of searches conducted by Ms Singh at ascertaining the country in which each of the relevant domain names is registered. The methodology used by Ms Singh is essentially the same as that which was employed by the experts who gave evidence in previous proceedings brought under section 115A. All of the target online locations appear to be located outside Australia.
17 As was explained in Roadshow at [49]:
The purpose of the online location may be ascertained by a consideration of the use that is or may be made of it. If the Court is satisfied that the principal activity for which the online location is used or designed to be used is copyright infringement or the facilitation of copyright infringement, then it will be open to conclude that the primary purpose of the online location is to infringe, or to facilitate the infringement of, copyright.
18 The infringement of copyright in audio-visual material by making such material available online free of charge, or assisting users to access other online locations that do so, appears to be the principal activity for which each of the target online locations is designed.
19 Based on the evidence before me, I am satisfied that:
the respondents provide access to the target online locations each of which is located outside Australia;
each of the target online locations have infringed or facilitated the infringement of the applicant's copyright in Wentworth; and
the primary purpose of each of the target online locations is to facilitate the infringement of copyright.
20 I am satisfied that the power to make orders under s 115A in respect of the target online locations is enlivened.
21 The nature and extent of the copyright material made available at each of the target online locations, or at other online locations, to which they provide links, demonstrates a flagrant disregard by the operators of the rights of copyright owners. The only persons likely to be interested in communicating with the target online locations are those who seek instant access to movies and television programs without having to pay for it. There are in my view no relevant discretionary considerations that weigh against the making of the orders sought by the applicant in respect of each of the target online locations.
22 I consider this is an appropriate case in which to make the orders under s 115A sought by the applicants.
I certify that the preceding twenty-two (22) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Nicholas.