© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2018] FCAFC 67
Federal Court of Australia (Full Court)
2018-05-03
Mr J, Jagot JJ
Original judgment source is linked above.
THE COURT: 1 Having regard to the degree of forensic success and failure in respect of the issues which arose for determination on the appeal and the ultimate outcome, the Court considers that, as between the Sandini parties and the Wavefront parties, there ought to be an apportionment of costs both in respect of the appeal and the proceedings below. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justices Siopis, Logan and Jagot.
SCHEDULE OF PARTIES WAD 172 of 2017
Respondents Fourth Respondent: ELLISON (WA) PTY LTD (ACN 135 966 773) Fifth Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION WAD 173 of 2017 Respondents Fourth Respondent: ELLISON (WA) PTY LTD (ACN 135 966 773) Fifth Respondent: DEBBIE MAREE ELLISON Sixth Respondent: WAVEFRONT ASSET PTY LTD (ACN 139 479 968) ATF THE FELSTEAD FAMILY TRUST
Ellison
Sandini Pty Ltd