© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2019] FCA 1812
Federal Court of Australia
2019-11-04
Mr AJ, Colvin J
Original judgment source is linked above.
Number of paragraphs: 8
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr C McKellar of Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation
Solicitor for the State of Western Australia: Mr GJ Ranson of the State Solicitors Office
Solicitor for the Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation: Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation
Solicitor for Gabor Holdings Pty Ltd: Mr AJ Carr of Cornerstone Legal
Solicitor for the Applicant: Dr CL Tan of Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation
Solicitor for the State of Western Australia: Mr GJ Ranson of the State Solicitors Office
Solicitor for Shire of Shark Bay: Shire of Shark Bay
Solicitor for the Applicant: Dr CL Tan of Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation
Solicitor for the State of Western Australia: Mr GJ Ranson of the State Solicitors Office
Solicitor for Shire of Shark Bay: Shire of Shark Bay
BETWEEN: VIOLET DRURY, COLLEEN DRAGE, JOHN STEPHEN DRAGE, STEVEN KELLY (FATHER OF MARRICK KELLY), STEVEN KELLY (GRANDSON OF CORNELIUS KELLY), WILLIAM MALLARD JR, WILLIAM MALLARD SR, NORA MALLARD, GWEN MITCHELL, HELEN NUTTER, ANNETTE PEPPER, JUNE RUFFIN, MARY TULLOCK, GERALD JOHN WHITBY, LORRAINE WHITBY, JANET WILSON Applicant
AND: STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA, JAMES MICHAEL DREW, LORETO MARY DREW, YAMATJI MARLPA ABORIGINAL CORPORATION, GARBOR HOLDINGS PTY LTD, TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED Respondent
BETWEEN: JOHN THOMAS OXENHAM, SARAH LOUISE BELLOTTIE, TERRENCE GORDON MCKIE, BIANCA ELISE MCNEAIR, DENISE CHARMAINE MITCHELL, LESLIE ANTHONY O'NEILL, ALBERT DARBY WINDER Applicant
AND: STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA, SHIRE OF SHARK BAY Respondent
BETWEEN: JOHN THOMAS OXENHAM, SARAH LOUISE BELLOTTIE, TERRENCE GORDON MCKIE, BIANCA ELISE MCNEAIR, DENISE CHARMAINE MITCHELL, LESLIE ANTHONY O'NEILL, ALBERT DARBY WINDER Applicant
AND: STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA, SHIRE OF SHARK BAY Respondent
JUDGE: COLVIN J DATE OF ORDER: 4 NOVEMBER 2019
THE COURT NOTES THAT: A. The Applicant in proceeding WAD 30 of 2019 has made a native title determination application (Nanda Application). B. The Applicant in proceeding WAD 339 of 2018 has made a native title determination application (Malgana #2 Application). C. The Applicant in proceeding WAD 402 of 2018 has made a native title determination application (Malgana #3 Application). D. On 28 November 2018 the Federal Court of Australia made a determination of native title pursuant to s 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (Native Title Act) in respect of part of the land and waters the subject of the Nanda Application: Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1849 (Drury). That part of the Nanda Application which was not the subject of the determination of native title in Drury included that portion of the Nanda Application which was geographically overlapped by the Malgana #2 Application and native title determination application WAD 6119 of 1998 (Mullewa Wadjari Community Application). E. Pursuant to s 64(1B) of the Native Title Act, following the determination in Drury, the Nanda Application was deemed to be amended to remove the area of the determination and, accordingly, the area of the Nanda Application currently comprises only those portions of the Nanda Application which is overlapped by the Malgana #2 Application and the Mullewa Wadjari Community Application. F. On 4 December 2018 the Federal Court of Australia made a determination of native title pursuant to s 87A of the Native Title Act in respect of part of the land and waters the subject of native title determination application WAD 6236 of 1998 (Malgana Application): Oxenham on behalf of the Malgana People v State of Western Australia [2018] FCA 1929 (Oxenham). That part of the Malgana Application which was not the subject of the determination of native title in Oxenham was that portion of the Malgana Application which was geographically overlapped by the Malgana #3 Application. The Malgana #3 Application was made to take advantage of the application of s 47B of the Native Title Act. G. Pursuant to s 64(1B) of the Native Title Act, following the determination in Oxenham, the Malgana Application was deemed to be amended to remove the area of the determination and, accordingly, the area of the Malgana Application is currently the same as the area of the Malgana #3 Application. H. The Applicants in the Nanda Application, the Malgana #2 Application, the Malgana #3 Application, the State of Western Australia and the other Respondents to those Applications (the parties) have reached an agreement as to the terms of the determination which is to be made in relation to an area that comprises the whole of the land and waters covered by the Malgana #2 Application and the Malgana #3 Application (the Determination Area). The external boundaries of the Determination Area are described in Schedule One to the determination. I. The Applicant in the Malgana Application has agreed to the dismissal of the Malgana Application in order to facilitate the determination sought in respect of the Malgana #3 Application. J. The parties have agreed that, in respect of the balance of the land and waters the subject of the Nanda Application (being that portion of the Nanda Application which is overlapped by the Mullewa Wadjari Community Application), no determination is to be made at present. K. Pursuant to s 87A(1)(d), (2) and (4) of the Native Title Act (in respect of the Nanda Application) and s 87(1), (1A) and (2) of the Native Title Act (in respect of the Malgana #2 Application and the Malgana #3 Application) the parties have filed with the Court this Minute of Proposed Consent Determination of Native Title setting out the terms of the agreement reached by the parties in relation to those applications. L. The terms of the agreement involve the making of consent orders for a determination pursuant to s 87A (in respect of the Nanda Application) and s 87 (in respect of the Malgana #2 Application and the Malgana #3 Application) and s 94A of the Native Title Act that native title exists in relation to the land and waters of the Determination Area. M. The parties acknowledge that the effect of the making of the determination is that the members of the relevant native title claim groups, in accordance with the traditional laws acknowledged and the traditional customs observed by them, should be recognised as the native title holders for part or all of the Determination Area as set out in the determination. N. Pursuant to s 87(2) and s 87A(4) of the Native Title Act, the parties have requested that the Court determine the proceedings that relate to the Determination Area without holding a hearing. BEING SATISFIED that a determination of native title in the terms set out in Attachment A would be within the power of the Court and, it appearing to the Court appropriate to do so, pursuant to s 87, s 87A and s 94A of the Native Title Act and by the consent of the parties:
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
Existence of native title: s 225 Native Title Act
The Determination Area, generally shown as bordered in blue on the maps at Schedule Two, comprises all land and waters bounded by the following description: Area 1 All those lands and waters commencing at the intersection of a western boundary of Lot 3080 as shown on Deposited Plan 51350 with Latitude 26.065281 South (Approximate Longitude 113.363669 East) and extending generally northwesterly and generally northeasterly along the boundaries of that lot to Longitude 113.362498 East (Approximate Latitude 26.062110 South); then southeasterly back to the commencement point. Area 2 All those lands and waters commencing at the southwesternmost corner of Native Title Determination WAD6236/1998 Malgana Part A (WCD2018/012); then extending easterly along the southern boundary of that native title determination to the intersection with Native Title Determination WAD30/2019 Nanda People and Nanda #2 (WCD2018/011); then southerly and generally southwesterly along the boundaries of that native title determination to the intersection with a point on the Lowest Astronomical Tide; then generally northwesterly along that lowest astronomical tide back to the commencement point. Note: Geographic Coordinates provided in Decimal Degrees. All referenced Deposited Plans and Diagrams are held by the Western Australian Land Information Authority, trading as Landgate. Cadastral boundaries sourced from Landgate's Spatial Cadastral Database dated 04 December 2018. Lowest Astronomical Tide is based on and sourced from Australian Maritime Boundaries data, 6th Edition released in February 2006. For the avoidance of doubt the application excludes any land and waters already claimed by: • Native Title Determination WAD6236/1998 Malgana Part A (WCD2018/012) as Determined in the Federal Court on 04 December 2018. • Native Title Determination WAD30/2019 Nanda People and Nanda #2 (WCD2018/011) as Determined in the Federal Court on 28 November 2018. Datum: Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94) Prepared By: Graphic Services (Landgate) 10 April 2019 Use of Coordinates: Where coordinates are used within the description to represent cadastral or topographical boundaries or the intersection with such, they are intended as a guide only. As an outcome to the custodians of cadastral and topographic data continuously recalculating the geographic position of their data based on improved survey and data maintenance procedures, it is not possible to accurately define such a position other than by detailed ground survey.
Paragraph 2 Native title does not exist in relation to land and waters the subject of the following interests within the Determination Area which, with the exception of public works (as described in cl 3 of this Schedule), are generally shown as shaded in pink on the maps at Schedule Two.
AREAS TO WHICH SECTION 47B OF THE NATIVE TITLE ACT APPLIES
Paragraph 9 Save for any areas described in cl 3 of Schedule Three, s 47B of the Native Title Act applies in relation to the whole of the area of native title determination application WAD 402 of 2018 with the effect that any extinguishment over that area to be disregarded.
OTHER INTERESTS Paragraph 10 The nature and extent of the Other Interests in relation to the Determination Area are as follows. Land tenure interests registered with the Western Australian Land Information Authority are current as at 11 April 2019. All other interests are current as at the date of the determination.
Paragraph 12 The Malgana People are those Aboriginal persons who: (a) are descended from one or more of the following ancestors (i) Julia Sappie O'Dene (also known as Julia Thompson); (ii) Hookey (also known as Angelick); (iii) Withia; or (iv) Nellie Peters; where descent can be by birth or adoption under traditional laws acknowledged and traditional customs observed by the Malgana People, and (b) identify themselves as Malgana and are accepted as Malgana by other Malgana People in accordance with the traditional laws acknowledged and the traditional customs observed by the Malgana People; and (c) have a connection with the land and waters in the Determination Area in accordance with the traditional laws acknowledged and the traditional customs observed by the Malgana People.
Paragraph 12 The Nanda People are those Aboriginal persons who: (a) are descended from at least one of the following Nanda apical ancestors: (i) Jilba; (ii) Venus; (iii) Mary Jane Batt; (iv) Brindy; (v) Alice McMurray; or (vi) Polly Descent includes adoption in accordance with traditional Nanda laws and customs; (b) identify themselves as Nanda under Nanda traditional law and custom and are so identified by other Nanda People as Nanda; and (c) have a connection with the land and waters of the Shared Area in accordance with traditional Nanda laws and customs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
COLVIN J: 1 The parties seek a determination of native title by consent. I have previously raised a concern about the aspect of the proposed orders that would result in two prescribed bodies corporate for the same area of land: Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia [2019] FCA 1138; and Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2019] FCA 1642. 2 The matter comes before me today at my direction for a case management hearing to consider the approach to be adopted in relation to the appointment of two prescribed bodies corporate as proposed by the consent orders. There is a secondary matter in relation to the particular terms in which orders will be made determining native title. That aspect is now agreed between all of the parties. 3 For the following reasons it is appropriate for orders as to all issues other than the prescribed bodies corporate to be made today and otherwise there should be questions referred to the Full Court. 4 In my earlier decisions I have already given reasons why I am satisfied that there should be a declaration of native title by consent. 5 However, on the view I take of what was addressed in the reasons in Moses v State of Western Australia [2007] FCAFC 78; (2007) 160 FCR 148 at [386], I consider there to be uncertainty as to precisely what was determined in that case and, in particular, what is to happen as to prescribed bodies corporate where there is overlapping native title. I accept the submissions advanced by the parties that it does appear to have been dealt with by Nicholson J at first instance on the basis that there could be two prescribed bodies corporate over the same land, but what is absent on my reading of the decision on appeal is detailed engagement with the particular issue. Therefore, there is difficulty in determining the approach to be adopted in cases of this kind. 6 The decision in Moses is expressed in a very compressed way on the point that is live in these proceedings without reference to the overall statutory context, in particular, how the issue plays through into other aspects of the operation of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). 7 The point is one of statutory construction only, and therefore there are not issues of fact which might cause the Court to be concerned about referring a matter to the Full Court because there are factual issues. The case raises issues which, in my view, are of considerable importance for native title claims and ought be addressed by a Full Court of this Court. 8 So for those reasons and recognising the principles to be applied in cases of this kind as expressed by McKerracher J in James v State of Western Australia [2009] FCA 1262 at [32]-[35], I propose to make the orders referring questions to the Full Court. I accept that otherwise the orders as to the consent determination sought should be made. I certify that the preceding eight (8) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Colvin.
Drury on behalf of the Nanda People
State of Western Australia