© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2001] QCA 57
Court of Appeal (Qld)
2001-02-27
de Jersey CJ, Wilson and Douglas JJJudgment of the Court.
Original judgment source is linked above.
PROCEDURE - INFERIOR COURTS - QUEENSLAND - DISTRICT COURTS - CIVIL JURISDICTION - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - applicant sought leave to appeal against District Court Judge's dismissal of appeal for want of jurisdiction - appeal dismissed where applicant failed to enter in required recognizance within time, and second respondent refused to waive consequences of non-compliance - whether second respondent a party to appeal such that his waiver refusal could be determinative of jurisdiction - where s 222(2)(a)(i) Justices Act requires service of notice of appeal on 'the person concerned in upholding (the) decision'
PROCEDURE - INFERIOR COURTS - QUEENSLAND - DISTRICT COURTS - CIVIL JURISDICTION - JURISDICTION - whether second respondent's view could be determinative of jurisdiction - applicability of ex parte Allen - effect of s 229(1) Justices Act - whether late compliance should instead be viewed as an irregularity enlivening a discretion in the Court whether or not to proceed
Appeal Costs Fund Act 1973 (Qld), s 15, s 15(1)
Justices Act 1886 (Qld), s 39, s 222, s 222(2)(a)(i), s 222(2)(a)(ii), s 222(2A), s 229(1)
Carey v Armstrong (1972) 66 QJPR 136, considered
Forsyth v O'Connor (1970) 66 QJPR 38, considered
R v the Judge of the District Court at Brisbane and Davies; ex parte Allen [1969] QdR 114, distinguished
Scottorn v Howard (1972) 66 QJPR 34, considered
Von Schulz v Durrant [2000] QCA 235, considered
Carey-Lin (not of counsel) appeared with leave for the second respondent
Carey-Lin appeared with leave for the second respondent
Double Time Pty Ltd
Ryan [2001] QCA 57