80 In Scolaro [No 2], the offender, a young woman, was convicted, after a trial in the Magistrates Court, of one offence of unlawful wounding. She was sentenced to 18 months' immediate imprisonment. The offender appealed to the Supreme Court against her conviction and sentence. Martin CJ dismissed the appeal against conviction but allowed the appeal against sentence. The appeal against sentence succeeded because some material errors of fact were made by the magistrate in sentencing the offender. The relevant facts, as found by the magistrate and corrected by Martin CJ on appeal, were as follows. The offender and the complainant, who was also a young woman, were at a nightclub in Northbridge late one evening and early the next morning. Before the events in question they were unknown to each other. Each of them had attended the nightclub with a group of friends. Both had been drinking alcohol but neither of them was intoxicated. There was a disagreement arising from an allegation that the complainant had taken a sip from the glass of either the offender or the offender's boyfriend while it was on the bar. An altercation ensued. During this altercation, the complainant was struck in the face with a heavy glass that had been held by the offender. The glass struck the complainant's face with such force that it broke and caused significant lacerations. She was taken to hospital and, eventually, treated by a plastic surgeon, who applied between 32 and 36 stitches, both internally and externally. Martin CJ found that the complainant initiated the physical exchange between the two women by throwing part of her drink upon the offender's back. Also, the complainant threw the balance of her drink at the offender before the offender propelled the glass into her face. Martin CJ re-exercised the sentencing discretion as a result of the magistrate's errors of fact. His Honour substituted a sentence of 12 months' immediate imprisonment and made a parole eligibility order.