Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v DP World Sydney Ltd
[2019] FCAFC 114
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Federal Court of Australia (Full Court)
Decision date
2019-07-05
Before
Rares J, Rares ACJ, Bromwich JJ
Catchwords
- Number of paragraphs: 3
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
Judgment (4 paragraphs)
- The application of the first, second, third and fourth respondents for an order for costs under s 570(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
THE COURT: 1 On 30 May 2019, we dismissed the application for relief under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) and reserved our reasons that we delivered on 20 June 2019: Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v DP World Sydney Ltd [2019] FCAFC 99. When dismissing the application, we ordered a timetable if any party wished to apply for costs: DP World [2019] FCAFC 99 at [24]. 2 In conformity with those orders, the first to fourth respondents (DP World) applied for an order under s 570(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) on the basis that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union had instituted the proceeding without reasonable cause. DP World argued that the Union's challenges to the decisions of the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission and the Deputy President were doomed to fail. DP World also argued that there was no real controversy as to the correct principles to be applied in the Commission arriving at a decision under s 443(5) of the Fair Work Act.