By way of a summons filed on 1 December 2020, the plaintiff, the Commissioner of Police, seeks orders in the nature of a serious crime prevention order within the meaning of s 5 of the Crimes (Serious Crime Prevention Orders) Act 2016 (NSW) ("the Act") on terms set out in annexure A of the summons.
The plaintiff seeks orders against two defendants, being Rafat Alameddine as the first defendant and Masood Zakaria as the second defendant. Mr Gyles SC appears for the plaintiff. Mr Saddik appears for the first defendant and Mr Khatiz appears for the second defendant.
The plaintiff relies on an affidavit of Nicholas Scott Regener, dated 21 December 2020, who is the solicitor acting for the plaintiff. The defendants have not sought to rely on any evidence.
The matter was first listed before me on 21 December 2020, ostensibly for the purposes of making case management orders for the exchange of further evidence and for the allocation of a hearing date. During the debate on that day, Mr Saddik indicated that his client may be prepared to discuss entering into consent orders with the plaintiff and I stood the matter over for further hearing until today, 24 December 2020.
On 23 December 2020, I was informed that the plaintiff and each of the first and second defendants had reached agreement as to orders which could be made under s 5 of the Act. I was provided with draft proposed orders.
I have reviewed those orders. As submitted by Mr Gyles, it is necessary that I have an independent satisfaction that the orders should be made. I am so satisfied and I set out the reasons for that satisfaction.
Mr Regener has been informed and instructed by Detective Chief Inspector Glyn Baker of a number of matters relating to both the Hamzy organised crime network and the Alameddine organised crime network.
Having regard to New South Wales Police Force COPS events, criminal histories and intelligence, DCI Baker believes that those two organised crime networks are responsible for drug importation, interstate drug supply, local drug supply, money laundering, public place shootings, kidnapping and other offences of violence. Mr Regener deposes to the belief of DCI Baker that the first and second defendants are members of or directly involved in the Alameddine crime network, and that both of them have been convicted of serious criminal offences and have otherwise engaged in serious criminal activity.
Since 2013, there have been several violent incidents, including murders involving members and associates of the Hamzy and Alameddine organised crime networks.
Further, during 2020, there have been a series of unreported conflicts between the two networks over drug distribution and DCI Baker believes that there is current and ongoing escalating conflict between the rival criminal networks.
Specific instances of that ongoing conflict are referred to in the affidavit of Mr Regener. Those specific instances include acts of violence, which were caught on video, which I viewed today, robbery and shootings.
On 11 November 2020, the plaintiff commenced separate proceedings in the Supreme Court against Ghassan Amoun and Ibrahem Hamze. Those proceedings were the subject of a judgment by Garling J on 18 December 2020. His Honour made a serious crime prevention order against Ghassan Amoun and Ibrahem Hamze. [1]
In addition to the affidavit of Mr Regener and the material annexed to that affidavit, I have regard to the content of his Honour's judgment. As Mr Gyles submits, the proceedings with which I am dealing are somewhat interlocked with the proceedings and orders made by Garling J.
As observed by his Honour, there have been only a limited number of judgments involving the Act. The Act was the subject of High Court consideration in Vella v Commissioner of Police (NSW). [2]
Although the principal issue in Vella was the validity of the legislation, considerable guidance may be obtained from the High Court's judgment in terms of the proper application of the Act.
Section 5 of the Act is in the following terms:
5 Making of serious crime prevention orders
(1) An appropriate court may, on the application of an eligible applicant, make an order (a serious crime prevention order) against a specified person if:
(a) in the case of a natural person - the person is 18 years old or older, and
(b) the court is satisfied that:
(i) the person has been convicted of a serious criminal offence, or
(ii) the person has been involved in serious crime related activity for which the person has not been convicted of a serious criminal offence (including by reason of being acquitted of, or not being charged with, such an offence), and
(c) the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the making of the order would protect the public by preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement by the person in serious crime related activities.
(2) If the ground relied on for an application for a serious crime prevention order against a person is that the person has been involved in serious crime related activity for which the person has not been convicted of a serious criminal offence by reason of an acquittal, the application must include the following information:
(a) the serious criminal offence of which the person was acquitted,
(b) the court in which the offence was tried,
(c) the date on which the person was acquitted.
(3) Unless the appropriate court orders otherwise, the applicant must serve a copy of the application on the person against whom the serious crime prevention order is sought at least 14 days before the hearing date for the application.
(4) The person against whom a serious crime prevention order is sought and any other person whose interests may be affected by the making of the order may appear at the hearing of the application and make submissions in relation to the application.
(5) In determining an application for a serious crime prevention order, the court may admit and take into account hearsay evidence despite any rule relating to the admission of hearsay evidence (whether under the Evidence Act 1995 or otherwise) if:
(a) the court is satisfied that the evidence is from a reliable source and is otherwise relevant and of probative value, and
(b) the person against whom the order is sought to be made has been notified of, and served with a copy of, the evidence before its admission.
(6) The applicant must ensure that a serious crime prevention order is served (whether by the applicant or another person) on the person against whom it is made. The order must be served by means of personal service.
As set out in Vella at [39]-[54], there are six steps that are required to be considered before a Court can exercise the power to make a serious crime prevention order under the Act. Those steps are as follows:
1. that it be established that each of the defendants is at least 18 years old;
2. that it be established that each of the defendants has either been convicted of a serious criminal offence or has been involved in serious crime related activity;
3. that there is a real or significant risk that each defendant will be involved in serious crime related activity as that term is defined;
4. that the facts establish reasonable grounds to believe that the potential order would have the effect of preventing, restricting or disputing the person's involvement in serious crime related activities;
5. that the Court must consider whether the proposed prohibitions, restrictions, requirements or other provisions are appropriate for the purpose of protecting the public by preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement in serious crime related activity, and
6. that the Court must consider whether it is appropriate that the orders should be made.
In the sixth step, the Court has a general discretion as to whether it is appropriate to make the orders.
There is no dispute as to what I will describe as the matters of fact, such as the age of the defendants and the criminal histories of the defendants. In circumstances in which the defendants consent to the orders sought and where similar or related issues have been the subject of an extensive judgment dealing with the Hamzy criminal network only as recently as 18 December 2020, it is not necessary that I reiterate the factual background to this application.
I am satisfied of the matters set out in ss 5(1)(a) and (b) of the Act. They are established on the evidence.
In terms of s 5(1)(c), I am satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the making of the orders would protect the public by preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement by the persons in serious crime relating activity.
I am so satisfied, having regard to the affidavit of Mr Regener, but also having regard to the proposed consent orders proposed by the parties. Those consent orders include matters such as a prohibition on the use of aliases, a requirement that the defendants notify of their residence and of any intention to move residence, restrictions on use of communication devices, including restrictions on use of encrypted devices, a prohibition on using more than one e-mail account and the requirement of notification of the e-mail account, a prohibition on possession of cash of a value of more than $10,000, a restriction on operating more than one bank account, a requirement of notification of ownership of use of vehicles and the restriction on associating with persons named in the proposed consent orders, including a number of members of the Alameddine and Hamzy family and any person known to the defendants or believed by the defendants to be a member of the criminal organisation known as Brothers for Life.
I am satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that those orders would protect the public by preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement by the defendants in serious crime related activities.
The final step is to consider whether I should exercise my discretion to make the orders proposed.
Having regard to the evidence before me and the matters referred to in the related matter of Amoun, I am satisfied that the orders should be made. I regard them as appropriate. I do not consider that the orders would significantly impact upon their general freedom of movement or right to live in the community in a law-abiding fashion. The orders are designed to restrict and prevent only criminal activity.
In the circumstances, it is appropriate that I make the orders sought.
In respect of each defendant, I make a serious crime prevention order within the meaning of s 5(1) of the Crimes (Serious Crime Prevention Orders) Act 2016 (NSW) on the terms and conditions set out in annexure A to this judgment for a period of 12 months.
[2]
Rafat Alameddine (First Defendant)
A. Definitions
In these orders, the following definitions apply:
"ordinary name" means, in respect the first defendant, Rafat Alameddine
"defendant" means the first defendant, Rafat Alameddine
"notify" means to send an email to an email address provided, in writing, by the Commissioner of Police, or his delegate, to each of the defendants and their lawyers, within three hours of these orders coming into effect (but in any event, cgsscpo@police.nsw.gov.au unless otherwise advised within the three hours). This email address is to then be the email address for the provision of any information required to be notified by either of the defendants to the Commissioner of Police in accordance with the orders of this Court;
"a communication device" or "a communication service" shall include but is not limited to:
1. a mobile telephone;
2. a telephone landline (whether with or without handset);
3. a SIM card or an e-SIM;
4. a satellite telephone;
5. a fixed or mobile telephone or like device which uses a Voice Over Internet Protocol;
6. a 2-way radio;
7. a computer;
8. a fax machine; or
9. any other device configured so as to enable voice, images, text or data to be sent or received.
"computer" includes but is not limited to:
1. a desktop computer;
2. a laptop computer;
3. a tablet computer; or
4. an iPad/Notebook or Netbook.
"cash" means banknotes and coins in any currency, including Australian currency, postal orders, traveller's cheques, casino chips and/or betting slips.
"designated username, password or personal information number" means:
1. for the first defendant, Rafat Alameddine:
2. Username: [redacted]
3. Password: [redacted]
4. Personal Identification No: [redacted]
B. IDENTITY
Prohibition on use of alias
1.1 The defendant is prohibited from using any name other than his ordinary name when speaking with, emailing or otherwise communicating with any police officer, Commonwealth or State government authority, or any employee or agent of such authority, any financial institution, when engaging in any commercial transaction, or when responding to any requirement lawfully made upon him for proof of his identity.
C. RESIDENCE
Notification of Residence
2.1 The defendant must, within 6 hours of these orders coming into effect, notify his current residential address.
2.2 If the defendant intends to change his residential address, he must notify, 7 days prior to moving, the following information:
(i) the date of his move to the proposed address;
(ii) the full address of the proposed residence; and
(iii) the date upon which he is to commence living at that proposed address.
2.3 The defendant is prohibited from residing, or staying the night, at any residence except for one notified in accordance with clauses 2.1 and 2.2 above. An exception to this prohibition is if the defendant notifies of any night (and the number of nights) during which he intends to temporarily reside away from the notified residential address at any form of accommodation, whether paid for, or provided without charge. The defendant must do so:
(i) if the absence is planned, at least 72 hours prior to the first night of absence;
(ii) if the absence is not planned, within 12 hours of the first night occurring.
D. COMMUNICATIONS
Restriction and notification of communications devices
3.1 The defendant is prohibited from using a communication device, a communication service, or a computer which:
(i) is not accessed or used in any name other than the designated username, or password, or which is not accessed through the designated username, or password, or personal identification number;
(ii) is encrypted, or else is capable of being used to send encrypted voice communications or transmit encrypted images or data messages;
(iii) to his knowledge, runs messaging applications or accesses websites which remain encrypted once received, or else automatically delete a message once sent, or else, once received and read;
(iv) to his knowledge, runs software, or accesses websites, which are designed to or else have the effect of, preventing data from being retrieved from the communications device, service or computer;
(v) if capable of accessing and has the capacity to retain the history of websites visited, but it is possible for this capacity is to be disabled or circumvented, the defendants must not disable, circumvent that function does not operate effectively;
(vi) is not registered with a service provider solely in the defendant's ordinary name.
3.2 Within 6 hours of this order taking effect, the defendant shall notify the Commissioner of any communication device or computer permitted by this order which he proposes to use, identifying the service provider, the service number, or telephone number and the IMEI (or other identifying number).
3.3 The defendant shall make available for examination on request by any police officer of the rank of Detective Sergeant (whether acting in that rank or otherwise) or above, any communication device or computer that he owns or has in his possession or uses or controls, together with any storage device, provided that any request is not made by a police officer for examination when in attendance at the defendant's residence at any time between 9pm and 7am.
3.4 The defendant is prohibited from using another person's communication device or computer at any time or in any place except for the purpose of contacting any emergency service or else any commercial provider of roadside assistance.
Restriction and notification of email and/or efax accounts
4.1 The defendant is prohibited from having, using or controlling more than one email account at any one time, except where the defendant is a proprietor of a business which has a current registered ABN, or else is employed by a business which has a current registered ABN in which case, the use or control by a defendant of one additional email account for the purposes of the registered business will be permitted.
4.2 Any email account the defendant has, uses or controls must be registered with the service provider in the defendant's ordinary name, and can only be used if the user-name and password are those designated in the order.
4.3 The defendant shall notify within 2 hours of first having, using or controlling an email account permitted by clause 4.2 above, the:
(i) the name of the email account provider;
(ii) the defendant's email address; and
(iii) the username and password associated with that email account.
4.4 The defendant is prohibited from using a communication device, or a computer, or subscribing or accessing any internet-based application which does not have the designated username, password or personal identification number.
4.5 The defendant must not use any publicly available communications device or computer other than for the purpose of contacting any Emergency Service or any commercial provider of roadside assistance.
4.6 The defendant is prohibited from owning, controlling or using any equipment which to his knowledge can be used for anti-surveillance purposes, including but not limited to:
(i) equipment capable of jamming, blocking or interrupting mobile phone transmissions or GPS signals; or
(ii) equipment capable of tracing audiovisual or other surveillance equipment.
E. CASH AND BANK ACCOUNTS
Restrictions on possession of cash
5.1 The defendant shall not possess cash to a total value of more than $10,000 in Australian currency.
Restriction on bank accounts
6.1 The defendant is prohibited from holding, using, or operating a bank account, whether in Australia or elsewhere, or credit card account, or possessing a credit or debit card, unless:
(i) there is only one account;
(ii) such account or card is held in the defendant's ordinary name;
(iii) the details of the financial institution, the account name and type, the account number, the BSB number and the current balance is first notified within 12 hours of the Order taking effect.
F. VEHICLES
Notification of the Ownership and Use of Vehicles
7.1 Within 12 hours of this Order taking effect, the defendant shall notify the details of any private motor vehicle which he owns, possesses, uses or controls. Any such notice shall include in respect of each vehicle the following information:
(i) the registered owner of the vehicle and their contact details;
(ii) the vehicle's registration number; and
(iii) the vehicle's make, model and colour.
7.2 The defendant is prohibited from driving or using any vehicle unless at least 12 hours prior to first driving the vehicle he has notified the details of the vehicle set out in Condition 7.1.
7.3 The defendant is prohibited from hiring a vehicle of any kind, and using, possessing or controlling a hire vehicle unless at least 12 hours prior to hiring or first using the hire vehicle, the defendant has complied with Condition 7.4.
7.4 The defendant may hire, use, possess or control a hire vehicle for his personal use provided that:
(i) the vehicle is hired in his ordinary name; and
(ii) he has notified his intention to hire the vehicle and provided the following details:
(a) the name and address of the hire company;
(b) the date on which he intends to take possession of the vehicle;
(c) the period for which he intends to hire the vehicle; and
(d) the vehicle's registration number;
(e) the vehicle's make, model and colour.
7.5 The defendant is prohibited from modifying, adapting or permitting another to modify or adapt any vehicle owned or used by him a way intended to conceal cash, firearms, weapons or drugs.
G. Restrictions on associating with other people
8.1 The defendant must not approach, contact, or speak to, or associate directly or indirectly with:
a. the other defendant, Masood Zakaria;
b. Shaylin Zreika;
c. Ali Younes;
d. Murat Gulasi
e. Bradley Lloyd;
f. Joseph Vokai;
g. Mohammed Salim Noorzai;
h. Mustafa Hafizi;
i. Bassam Hamzy, Haissam Hamzy (DOB 14/04/1994), Tareek Hamzy (DOB 05/01/1998), Ghassan Amoun, Ibrahem Hamze, or any of their family members, or any person known to the defendant, or else believed by the defendant to be a criminal associate of the Hamzy family; or
j. any person known to the defendant, or else believed by the defendant to be a member of the criminal organisation known as "Brothers for Life",
whether in writing, or by oral or electronic communication (i.e. via telephone, text message, email or other social media) or communication through a third party.
[3]
Masood Zakaria (Second Defendant)
From the time this order is served on the second defendant, the Court makes a Serious Crime Prevention Order within the meaning of s 5(1) of the Crimes (Serious Crime Prevention Orders) Act 2016 on the terms and conditions as set out below for a period of 12 months.
A. Definitions
In these orders, the following definitions apply:
"ordinary name" means in respect of the second defendant, Masood Zakaria;
"defendant" means the second defendant, Masood Zakaria
"notify" means to send an email to an email address provided, in writing, by the Commissioner of Police, or his delegate, to each of the defendants or their lawyers, within three hours of these orders coming into effect (but in any event, cgsscpo@police.nsw.gov.au unless otherwise advised within the three hours). This email address is to then be the email address for the provision of any information required to be notified by either of the defendants to the Commissioner of Police in accordance with the orders of this Court;
"a communication device" or "a communication service" shall include but is not limited to:
1. a mobile telephone;
2. a telephone landline (whether with or without handset);
3. a SIM card or an e-SIM;
4. a satellite telephone;
5. a fixed or mobile telephone or like device which uses a Voice Over Internet Protocol;
6. a 2-way radio;
7. a computer;
8. a fax machine; or
9. any other device configured so as to enable voice, images, text or data to be sent or received.
"computer" includes but is not limited to:
1. a desktop computer;
2. a laptop computer;
3. a tablet computer; or
4. an iPad/Notebook or Netbook.
"cash" means banknotes and coins in any currency, including Australian currency, postal orders, traveller's cheques, casino chips and/or betting slips.
"designated username, password or personal information number" means:
1. for the second defendant, Masood Zakaria:
2. Username: [redacted]
3. Password: [redacted]
4. Personal Identification No: [redacted]
B. IDENTITY
Prohibition on use of alias
1.1 The defendant is prohibited from using any name other than his ordinary name when speaking with, emailing or otherwise communicating with any police officer, Commonwealth or State government authority, or any employee or agent of such authority, any financial institution, when engaging in any commercial transaction, or when responding to any requirement lawfully made upon him for proof of his identity.
C. RESIDENCE
Notification of Residence
2.1 The defendant must, within 6 hours of these orders coming into effect, notify his current residential address.
2.2 If the defendant intends to change his residential address, he must notify, 7 days prior to moving, the following information:
(a) the date of his move to the proposed address;
(b) the full address of the proposed residence; and
(c) the date upon which he is to commence living at that proposed address.
2.3 The defendant is prohibited from residing, or staying the night, at any residence except for one notified in accordance with clauses 2.1 and 2.2 above. An exception to this prohibition is if the defendant notifies of any night (and the number of nights) during which he intends to temporarily reside away from the notified residential address at any form of accommodation, whether paid for, or provided without charge. The defendant must do so:
(a) if the absence is planned, at least 72 hours prior to the first night of absence;
(b) if the absence is not planned, within 12 hours of the first night occurring.
D. COMMUNICATIONS
Restriction and notification of communications devices
3.1 The defendant is prohibited from using a communication device, a communication service, or a computer which:
(a) is not accessed or used in any name other than the designated username, or password, or which is not accessed through the designated username, or password, or personal identification number;
(b) is encrypted, or else is capable of being used to send encrypted voice communications or transmit encrypted images or data messages;
(c) to his knowledge, runs messaging applications or accesses websites which remain encrypted once received, or else automatically delete a message once sent, or else, once received and read;
(d) to his knowledge, runs software, or accesses websites, which are designed to or else have the effect of, preventing data from being retrieved from the communications device, service or computer;
(e) if capable of accessing and has the capacity to retain the history of websites visited, but it is possible for this capacity to be disabled or circumvented, the defendant must not disable or circumvent that function so it does not operate effectively;
(f) is not registered with a service provider solely in the defendant's ordinary name.
3.2 Within 6 hours of this order taking effect, the defendant shall notify of any communication device or computer permitted by this order which he proposes to use, identifying the service provider, the service number, or telephone number and the IMEI (or other identifying number).
3.3 The defendant shall make available for examination on request by any police officer of the rank of Detective Sergeant (whether acting in that rank or otherwise) or above, any communication device or computer that he owns or has in his possession or uses or controls, together with any storage device, provided that any request is not made by a police officer for examination when in attendance at the defendant's residence at any time between 9pm and 7am.
3.4 The defendant is prohibited from using another person's communication device or computer at any time or in any place except for the purpose of contacting any emergency service or else any commercial provider of roadside assistance.
Restriction and notification of email and/or efax accounts
4.1 The defendant is prohibited from having, using or controlling more than one email account at any one time, except where the defendant is a proprietor of a business which has a current registered ABN, or else is employed by a business which has a current registered ABN in which case, the use or control by a defendant of one additional email account for the purposes of the registered business will be permitted.
4.2 Any email account the defendant has, uses or controls must be registered with the service provider in the defendant's ordinary name, and can only be used if the user-name and password are those designated in the order.
4.3 The defendant shall notify within 2 hours of first having, using or controlling an email account permitted by clause 4.2 above, the:
(a) the name of the email account provider;
(b) the defendant's email address; and
(c) the username and password associated with that email account.
4.4 The defendant is prohibited from using a communication device, or a computer, or subscribing or accessing any internet-based application which does not have the designated username, password or personal identification number.
4.5 The defendant must not use any publicly available communications device or computer other than for the purpose of contacting any Emergency Service or any commercial provider of roadside assistance.
4.6 The defendant is prohibited from owning, controlling or using any equipment which to his knowledge can be used for anti-surveillance purposes, including but not limited to:
(a) equipment capable of jamming, blocking or interrupting mobile phone transmissions or GPS signals; or
(b) equipment capable of tracing audiovisual or other surveillance equipment.
E. CASH AND BANK ACCOUNTS
Restrictions on possession of cash
5.1 The defendant shall not possess cash to a total value of more than $10,000 in Australian currency.
Restriction on bank accounts
6.1 The defendant is prohibited from holding, using, or operating a bank account, whether in Australia or elsewhere, or credit card account, or possessing a credit or debit card, unless:
(a) there is only one account;
(b) such account or card is held in the defendant's ordinary name;
(c) the details of the financial institution, the account name and type, the account number, the BSB number and the current balance is first notified within 12 hours of the Order taking effect.
F. VEHICLES
Notification of the Ownership and Use of Vehicles
7.1 Within 12 hours of this Order taking effect, the defendant shall notify the details of any private motor vehicle which he owns, possesses, uses or controls. Any such notice shall include in respect of each vehicle the following information:
(a) the registered owner of the vehicle and their contact details;
(b) the vehicle's registration number; and
(c) the vehicle's make, model and colour.
7.2 The defendant is prohibited from driving or using any vehicle unless at least 12 hours prior to first driving the vehicle he has notified the details of the vehicle set out in Condition 7.1.
7.3 The defendant is prohibited from hiring a vehicle of any kind, and using, possessing or controlling a hire vehicle unless at least 12 hours prior to hiring or first using the hire vehicle, the defendant has complied with Condition 7.4.
7.4 The defendant may hire, use, possess or control a hire vehicle for his personal use provided that:
(a) the vehicle is hired in his ordinary name; and
(b) he has notified his intention to hire the vehicle and provided the following details:
(i) the name and address of the hire company;
(ii) the date on which he intends to take possession of the vehicle;
(iii) the period for which he intends to hire the vehicle; and
(iv) the vehicle's registration number;
(v) the vehicle's make, model and colour.
7.5 The defendant is prohibited from modifying, adapting or permitting another to modify or adapt any vehicle owned or used by him a way intended to conceal cash, firearms, weapons or drugs.
G. Restrictions on associating with other people
8.1 The defendant must not approach, contact, or speak to, or associate directly or indirectly with:
a. Rafat Alameddine;
b. Shaylin Zreika;
c. Mustafa Hafizi;
d. Jihad Alaedddine;
e. Richad Alameddine;
f. Hamdi Andrew Alameddine;
g. Talal Alameddine;
h. Bassam Hamzy, Haissam Hamzy (DOB 14/04/1994), Tareek Hamzy (DOB 05/01/1998), Ghassan Amoun, Ibrahem Hamze, or any of their family members, or any person known to the defendant, or else believed by the defendant to be a criminal associate of the Hamzy family; or
i. any person known to the defendant, or else believed by the defendant to be a member of the criminal organisation known as "Brothers for Life",
whether in writing, or by oral or electronic communication (i.e. via telephone, text message, email or other social media) or communication through a third party.
[4]
Endnotes
Commissioner of Police v Amoun & Anor [2020] NSWSC 1810 ("Amoun").
[2019] HCA 38; 93 ALJR 1236 ("Vella").
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Decision last updated: 05 January 2021