83. As at 11 September 1998, Dr Davis considered that the applicant's prognosis was good (T24). As he told the Tribunal, he considered the applicant to be resilient, and that whilst a number of work factors complicated the situation, he thought that medically the applicant could work through her depression. Dr McCleave agreed in his evidence with Dr Davis' assessment, believing that the prognosis was good as at that time. Taking into account the medical evidence before it, the Tribunal is satisfied, and so finds, that the applicant continued to suffer from her condition throughout 1998, and was continuing to suffer into 1999, whilst making some progress in working through her depression. It is further satisfied that as at this time, her condition continued to be contributed to in a material degree by the actual work she had been undertaking in late 1997. The Tribunal is satisfied and finds that the particular investigative issues continued to contribute, notwithstanding the other non-work related issues that were also substantially involved in her depressive condition. The Tribunal notes that Dr Davis considered that by mid 1999, the applicant was well enough to make a decision regarding whether or not she could return to work. The Tribunal concludes, on the evidence before it, that by about August/September 1999, some symptoms of the depressive condition were still present. The applicant had however, with the benefit of Ms Barrett, worked through those aspects of her depressive condition that were related to the actual work she was undertaking and the conditions in which she was performing it in late 1997. She had worked through these aspects such that she was in a position to consider a return to work.