QLDQCA
Chapman v State of Queensland [2003] QCA 172
[2003] QCA 172
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2003-05-02|Before: de Jersey CJ, White and Atkinson JJJudgment of the, Court
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2003-05-02
Before
de Jersey CJ, White and Atkinson JJJudgment of the, Court
Catchwords
- APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE –
- QUEENSLAND – TIME FOR APPEAL – EXTENSION OF
- TIME – where
- applicant was self-represented at trial and lacked knowledge of legal procedure
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE –QUEENSLAND – TIME FOR APPEAL – EXTENSION OFTIME – whereapplicant was self-represented at trial and lacked knowledge of legal procedure– where applicant claimsshe was misled by trial judge – whereapplicant disagrees with trial judge’s acceptance of evidence led by thedefendant– whether an appeal would be plainly hopeless.Queensland Trustees Limited v Fawckner [1964] Qd R 153,citedFord v La Forrest [2001] QCA 455[2002] 2 Qd R 44,citedHunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344,cited
Judgment
Judgment text is temporarily unavailable while the source document is re-fetched.
Parties
Applicant/Plaintiff:
# Chapman
Respondent/Defendant:
State of Queensland \[2003\] QCA 172