© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2013] QSC 67
Supreme Court of Queensland
2013-03-22
Applegarth J
Original judgment source is linked above.
[1] BM Alliance Coal Operations Pty Ltd v BGC Contracting Pty Ltd & Ors [2012] QSC 346.
[2] Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 190; (2010) 78 NSWLR 393; Northbuild Construction Pty Ltd v Central Interior Linings Pty Ltd [2011] QCA 22; [2012] 1 Qd R 525.
[3] Thiess Pty Ltd v President of the Industrial Court of Queensland [2011] 2 Qd R 387.
[4] R v Ross-Jones; Ex parte Green (1984) 156 CLR 185 at 194 per Gibbs CJ; followed in Solution 6 Holdings Ltd and Others v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales and Others [2004] NSWCA 200; (2004) 60 NSWLR 558, which was in turn followed in Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Ltd (supra) at 446 - 449 [267] - [284].
[7] [1949] HCA 33; (1949) 78 CLR 389 at 400.
[8] SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 235 ALR 609 at [28]. In the same case Kirby J at [77] referred to "the need to conserve relief to cases where it is appropriate and required to do practical justice."
[9] Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission [1992] HCA 10; (1992) 175 CLR 564 at 581-582.
[10] Aronson, M, Dyer, B, and Groves, M Judicial Review of Administrative Action 4th ed Thomson Reuters, NSW, 2009 at [10.100].
[11] John Fairfax & Sons v Police Tribunal of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 465 at 470.
[12] Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Crazzi [2006] NSWSC 1090; (2006) 68 NSWLR 266 at 303 [224].
[13] Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1167 at [9] - [11].
[14] Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd (supra) at 405 [43] per Spigelman CJ.
[15] Capricorn Quarries Pty Ltd v Inline Communication Construction Pty Ltd [2012] QSC 388 at [41].
[16] [2008] QCA 397; [2009] 1 Qd R 390 at 401 [40].
[18] BMA relies upon this formulation which appears in Young, PW Declaratory Orders, 2nd ed Butterworths, Sydney, 1984 at 720. BGC submits that the authorities do not suggest that there must always be public interest to justify the exercise of the discretion.
[20] [2011] NSWCA 399 at [51].
[23] BM Alliance Coal Operations Pty Ltd v BGC Contracting Pty Ltd (supra) at [58].
[24] [2002] HCA 11; (2002) 209 CLR 597 at 613 [46].
[26] [1997] FCA 1313; [1997] 79 FCR 400 at 413.
[28] Ibid at 16 [42]. See also Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Maman [2012] FCAFC 13; (2012) 200 FCR 30 at 44 [44].
[29] Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (supra) at 646 [151] per Hayne J.
[34] Supra at [81]. The further observation at [83] that "Unless the relevant statute indicates otherwise, a void determination is not a determination at all" is cross-referenced to [81] and, in its context, should be taken to refer to a determination which is declared to be void.
[35] Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd (supra) at 448 [275].
[36] Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd v Ian James Ericson [2011] QSC 327.
[38] [1989] 1 Qd R 678 at 681.
[39] Cook's Constructions v Stork Food Systems Australia Pty Ltd [2008] QSC 220 at [41].
[40] Mulvaney Holdings Pty Ltd v Thorne (No 2) [2012] QSC 146 at [25].
[41] Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), r 681.
[42] AGL Sales (Qld) Pty Ltd v Dawson Sales Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] QSC 75 at [15].
[43] [2010] QCA 58 at [8].
[44] Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc.) (1986) ATPR 40-748 at [48136].
BM Alliance Coal Operations Pty Ltd
BGC Contracting Pty Ltd & Ors
AGL Sales (Qld) Pty Ltd v Dawson Sales Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] QSC 75, cited
Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564; [1992] HCA 10, cited
Alborn v Stephens [2010] QCA 58, cited
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Crazzi (2006) 68 NSWLR 266; [2006] NSWSC 1090, cited
BM Alliance Coal Operations Pty Ltd v BGC Contracting Pty Ltd & Ors [2012] QSC 346, cited
Capricorn Quarries Pty Ltd v Inline Communication Construction Pty Ltd [2012] QSC 388, cited
Cardinal Project Services Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 399, considered
Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd (2010) 78 NSWLR 393; [2010] NSWCA 190, followed
Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1167, followed
Cook's Constructions v Stork Food Systems Australia Pty Ltd [2008] QSC 220, cited
Emergency Services Superannuation Board v Davenport [2004] NSWSC 697, considered
Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd v Ian James Ericson [2011] QSC 327, considered
Jadwan Pty Ltd v Secretary, Department of Health and Aged Care (2003) 145 FCR 1; [2003] FCAFC 288, followed
Leung v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1997] FCA 1313; [1997] 79 FCR 400, cited
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Maman (2012) 200 FCR 30; [2012] FCAFC 13, cited
Minister of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597; [2002] HCA 11, cited
Mulvaney Holdings Pty Ltd v Thorne (No 2) [2012] QSC 146, cited
Northbuild Construction Pty Ltd v Central Interior Linings Pty Ltd [2012] 1 Qd R 525; [2011] QCA 022, cited
Ex parte Ozone Theatres (Aust) Ltd (1949) 78 CLR 389; [1949] HCA 33, cited
R v Ross-Jones; Ex parte Green (1984) 156 CLR 185; [1984] HCA 82, cited
RJ Neller Building Pty Ltd v Ainsworth [2009] 1 Qd R 390; [2008] QCA 397, cited
Solution 6 Holdings Ltd and Others v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales and Ors (2004) 60 NSWLR 558; [2004] NSWCA 200, cited
SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 235 ALR 609; [2007] HCA 26, cited
Thiess Pty Ltd v President of the Industrial Court of Queensland [2011] 2 Qd R 387; [2011] QSC 294, cited
"Such an approach has much to recommend it, particularly, it might be added, if the claimant is otherwise unable to pursue its original payment claim to achieve a second adjudication. However, such conditional relief can itself only be valid if it is designed to achieve a legitimate purpose; cf Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wang [2003] HCA 11; 215 CLR 518 at [15] - [16] (Gleeson CJ); [39] (McHugh J); [68] Gummow and Hayne JJ). If the determination is indeed legally ineffective in all respects, it would be doubtful whether the Court could condition declaratory relief (or an order setting aside the decision) upon the applicant making such payment as would be required by the determination if validity could be determined part by part, like the curate's egg. Accordingly, the underlying assumption was inconsistent with total invalidity for all purposes."[21]
(1992) 175 CLR 564
(2006) 68 NSWLR 266
(2010) 78 NSWLR 393
(2003) 145 FCR 1
(1986) 5 NSWLR 465
(2012) 200 FCR 30
(2002) 209 CLR 597
(1949) 78 CLR 389
(1984) 156 CLR 185
(2004) 60 NSWLR 558
(2007) 235 ALR 609