QLDQCA
Bell v Liebsanft & Ors [2004] QCA 267
[2004] QCA 267
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2004-07-29|Before: Davies and Jerrard JJA and Mullins JSeparate, reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the, order made
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2004-07-29
Before
Davies and Jerrard JJA and Mullins JSeparate, reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the, order made
Catchwords
- APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - APPEAL - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - QUEENSLAND - TIME
- FOR APPEAL - EXTENSION OF TIME - GENERAL PRINCIPLES AS
- TO GRANT OR REFUSAL -
- where there was an application to strike out an application for an extension of
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - APPEAL - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - QUEENSLAND - TIMEFOR APPEAL - EXTENSION OF TIME - GENERAL PRINCIPLES ASTO GRANT OR REFUSAL -where there was an application to strike out an application for an extension oftime within which to seek leaveto appeal to this Court - where the applicantwas the wife of the respondent - where the applicant was granted temporaryprotectionorders by a magistrate pursuant to the Domestic and FamilyViolence Protection Act 1991 (Qld) - where the respondent unsuccessfullyapplied to the Supreme Court for judicial review of the orders - where therespondentnow seeks leave to appeal to this Court - whether the appeal and theapplication for leave to appeal should be struck outDomestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1989 (Qld), s 3(3),s 39AJudicial Review Act 1991 (Qld), s 48(5)Bell v Bay-Jespersen [2004] QCA 68Appeal No 9591 of 2003, 19March 2004, followed