QLDQCA
Ballymont Pty Ltd v Ipswich City Council
[2002] QCA 454
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2002-11-01|Before: McMurdo P, Fryberg and Wilson JJJoint reasons for, judgment of Fryberg and Wilson JJ, separate reasons for McMurdo P, concurring as, to the orders made.
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Court of Appeal (Qld)
Decision date
2002-11-01
Before
McMurdo P, Fryberg and Wilson JJJoint reasons for, judgment of Fryberg and Wilson JJ, separate reasons for McMurdo P, concurring as
Catchwords
- APPEAL – Practice and procedure – Queensland – Powers of
- court – Costs – Order in favour of respondent
- local authority
- – Ambit of discretion as to costs under UCPR – Whether objector
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
APPEAL – Practice and procedure – Queensland – Powers ofcourt – Costs – Order in favour of respondentlocal authority– Ambit of discretion as to costs under UCPR – Whether objectorappeals should be treated differently– Whether local authority mustdemonstrate special interestUniform Civil Procedure Rules (Qld), r 689, r 766(1)(d)LocalGovernment (Planning and Environment) Act 1990 (Qld), s 7.6Tamborine Mountain Progress Association Inc. v Beaudesert ShireCouncil (1995) 2 Qd R 231, consideredWyatt v Albert Shire Council[1987] 1 Qd R 486, followed.
Judgment (1 paragraphs)
[1]
City Solicitor - Ipswich City Council for the first respondent