D. If the Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship has not continued to exist, has the gift lapsed?
35 Extrinsic evidence is admissible in the construction of a will, and is admissible for the purposes of identifying persons and things to which a testator intended to refer: Re Tyrie, deceased (No 1) [1972] VR 168 at 186; Gerhady v South Australian Auxilliary to the British & Foreign Bible Society Inc (No 3) (1986) 44 SASR 195 at 204-206. Where an institution and its address are named in a will, the address may be considered as being only for the identification of the institution and as having no other significance: Re Flynn, deceased [1975] VR 633 at 638-639.
36 The Trust submitted that the evidence in these proceedings demonstrated that there was no church known as the Philippines and Australia Episcopal Church of Glendenning. The Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship, which as at 27 July 1997 was functioning as an Area Mission of the Episcopal Church in the Philippines, had been meeting for over 12 months at the St Alban's Anglican Church Hall, Rooty Hill. The name "Philippines and Australia Episcopal Church" was Reverend Gayagay's description of the ecclesial relationship of the Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship to the Episcopal Church in the Philippines and the Anglican Church of Australia until such time as it became part of the Diocese of Sydney.
37 The Trust submitted further that the name "Philippines and Australia Episcopal Church" was given to the deceased by her brother Mr Rand through Mr Carter. It will be recalled that in December 1996 when asked by Mr Carter about what name to call his church, because the deceased wished to include it in her will, Reverend Gayagay suggested the name "the Philippines and Australia Episcopal Church": see par [10] above. The Trust submitted that the unincorporated association Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship was the organisation that the deceased intended to benefit by the gift contained in cl 4(f) of her will. She intended the address "Glendenning, New South Wales" to be a means of identification only, being the church under the leadership of Reverend Gayagay who lived there, and for no other purpose.
38 The fact that the name and address of an institution have changed does not mean that it ceases to exist: Flynn (supra) at 636-639. Where for all practical purposes the activity and operations of an institution have been continued without change notwithstanding that the institution may even have been dissolved and succeeded by another, the institution will be regarded as not having ceased to exist: Public Trustee v Cerebral Palsy Association of Western Australia Ltd [2004] WASC 36; (2004) 28 WAR 496 at [5]-[21], [40]; Cram Foundation v Corbett-Jones [2006] NSWSC 495 at [27]; Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Ceduna District Health Services Inc [2006] SASC 286 at [18]-[19].
39 The Trust submitted that the evidence showed that the unincorporated association Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship has continued to exist since 22 October 2002 notwithstanding its change of name to St Paul's Multicultural Filipino-Anglican Ministry and the changes to the place where it meets to St Paul's Anglican Church, Harris Park and All Saints Anglican Church, North Parramatta. The continuation of the activities of the Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship after that date, the transfer of its funds from the Fil-Aussie account to the St Paul's account, and the agreement on essential matters between the Episcopal Church in the Philippines and the Anglican Church of Australia all serve to confirm that the Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship has continued to exist since that date.
Consideration
40 In my opinion the unincorporated association Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship was the organisation that the deceased intended to benefit by the gift contained in cl 4(f) of her will. Moreover, the change of name to St Paul's Multicultural Filipino-Anglican Ministry, and the other changes described above, does not indicate that it has for any of those reasons no longer continued to exist. St Paul's Multicultural Filipino-Anglican Ministry is the successor to the Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship, which was misdescribed in the will of the deceased as the Philippines and Australia Episcopal Church. The material contained in the document described as the Written Undertaking of Evidence from Reverend Gayagay to the plaintiff's solicitors explains, in what appears to me to be a most credible and convincing way, how the name in cl 4(f) of the will of the deceased was chosen. The history of the unincorporated association since then has not to my observation served to eradicate the existence of the intended object of the gift. The letter to the plaintiff's solicitors dated 21 September 2007 from The Most Reverend Ignacio C. Soliba, Prime Bishop of the Episcopal Church in the Philippines is strong evidence that supports this.
41 One of the constants throughout the period since prior to the date of the will of the deceased has also been the continued connection of Reverend Gayagay with the unincorporated association by whatever name it may have been known, and whatever its location may have been, from time to time. It is clear from all of the available evidence that he was and apparently remains a driving force, and a personality of considerable influence, in the Filipino community centred (although by no means exclusively) around Rooty Hill. That community was a constant source of parishioners and communicants in the congregations over which he presided or which he served. There is no evidence to contradict or to cast any doubt upon assertions such as those made by Priti Pasupuleti that "St Paul's Multicultural Filipino-Anglican Ministry (the "Ministry"), then under its former name, the Philippine and Australian Episcopal Church, was formally recognised as an Anglican ministry of the Sydney Diocese". These types of pronouncement from someone in the position of the Legal Officer of the Anglican Church Diocese of Sydney in the context of these proceedings is strong adjectival support for the continuity of the organisation and for the fact that the deceased's description of the beneficiary in cl 4(f) of her will was in fact a misdescription of the Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship.
Answers
42 I consider that the plaintiff would be justified in distributing the gift contained in cl 4(f) of the will of the deceased to St Paul's Multicultural Filipino-Anglican Ministry, a congregation of the All Saints Anglican Church in North Parramatta. It follows that I would answer the first question "Yes". It is unnecessary in the circumstances to answer the remainder of the questions.
Miscellaneous
43 However, the Trust has raised the issue of who or what may be the appropriate person or body to give a receipt to the plaintiff. It had submitted, in the context of its original contention that the proceedings should be reconstituted, that I make a declaration that the St Paul's Multicultural Filipino-Anglican Ministry is the successor of the Fil-Aussie Christian Fellowship and that I order by way of scheme that the balance of the share of residue given by cl 4(f) of the will of the deceased, after payment of the plaintiff's costs, be paid or transferred to the Trust to be applied to the St Paul's Multicultural Filipino-Anglican Ministry for its general purposes.
44 At the time when those submissions were made the plaintiff, and those others who appeared before me, obviously did not have the advantage of knowing my views on the questions upon which the advice of the Court was being sought. It seems to me that in the events that have occurred, and in the light of the views expressed on behalf of the Attorney General, and also having regard to the plaintiff's preference, communicated in open Court through her counsel, in favour of an expeditious completion of this matter and the winding up of the estate, that I should invite the parties to consider these reasons for judgment and to give consideration to what should then occur. It may then be possible to dispose of a number of otherwise outstanding matters by consent.
Orders
45 I answer the first question "yes". In the meantime I will in the circumstances do no more than publish these reasons for judgment and stand the proceedings over to a date suitable to the parties to be arranged in consultation with my Associate.