Attorney-General (Cth) v Amin
[2023] NSWSC 1280
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Supreme Court of NSW
Decision date
2023-10-13
Before
Weinstein J, Garling J
Catchwords
- [2016] NSWCA 57 New South Wales v Naaman (No 2) (2018) 276 A Crim R 30
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
Judgment (23 paragraphs)
JUDGMENT
- By Summons filed on 9 October 2023, the plaintiff Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia seeks orders pursuant to s 105A.7A(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) (the Criminal Code) that the defendant, Nowroz Amin, be subject to an Extended Supervision Order (ESO) for 12 months under the conditions set out in the Schedule to the Summons.
- By way of interim relief, the Attorney-General seeks an order pursuant to s 105A.9A of the Criminal Code that Mr Amin be subject to an Interim Supervision Order (ISO) for a period of 28 days, imposing the same conditions as set out in the Schedule. Orders were also sought, unopposed, for the suppression of certain material.
- On 13 October 2023, on an urgent basis, I conducted a preliminary hearing to determine whether an ISO should be made, pursuant to s 105A.9A(2) of the Criminal Code. By the time of the hearing, the parties had reached consensus on all matters, and I made all interim orders sought by the plaintiff, without admission and without prejudice to the defendant's opposition to the making of an ESO. I am grateful to Mr Lenehan SC who appeared on behalf of the Attorney-General, and Mr Wilson SC who appeared for Mr Amin for the manner in which they conducted these proceedings, given the short timeframe in which the matter was prepared.