NSWNSWCATAD
ALZ v SafeWork NSW
[2016] NSWCATAD 156
NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity|2016-07-15
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity
Decision date
2016-07-15
Catchwords
- Clenae Pty Ltd v ANZ Banking Group [2000] HCA 63
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
Clenae Pty Ltd v ANZ Banking Group [2000] HCA 63
Judgment (2 paragraphs)
[1]
REASONS FOR DECISION
- The Applicant brought this application requesting that I disqualify myself from further dealing with three of her applications. The Respondent in each of these matters is SafeWork NSW. I am not aware of whether or not the Respondent has been advised of this request but in any event it is not necessary for the Respondent to oppose or agree with an application of this nature.
- The Applicant's application that I recuse myself arises from my recent decision in matter number 133158. The Applicant wrote: "I apprehend, after reading the reasons for your decision in ALZ v SafeWork NSW (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAD 121, that you did not bring an impartial and unprejudiced mind to the resolution of the issues and I consider that a fair-minded lay observer would agree."
- Her application is said to be based on unattributed or wrongly attributed submissions and a failure to refer to her submissions.
- In ALZ v SafeWork NSW (No 2) [2016] NSWCATAD 121 ("ALZ v SafeWork (No 2)") the Applicant alleged that the Respondent's conduct contravened several of the Health Privacy Principles ("HPPs") of the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 ("HRIP Act") and also several of the Information Protection Principles ("IPPs") of the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 ("PPIP Act"). The conduct which was the subject of her complaint concerns a medical report prepared in relation to a workers compensation claim that she had brought against her employer. The Respondent obtained a copy of the medical report from the Applicant's employer. She alleged breaches of HPPs and IPPs by one of the Respondent's Inspectors in relation to the medical report.
- The Respondent conceded breaches of several IPPs and HPPs. It accepted that its conduct breached the following provisions of the HRIP Act and the PPIP Act: