{"id":"qld:act-1995-002","name":"Transport Operations (Marine Pollution) Act 1995","slug":"transport-operations-marine-pollution-act-1995","collection":"act","jurisdiction":"qld","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"2 of 1995","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":104727,"registerId":"qld-act-1995-002-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-03","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"pt.1","sectionType":"part","heading":"Preliminary","content":"# Preliminary","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"pt.1-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Introduction","content":"## Introduction","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"sec.1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Short title","content":"### sec.1 Short title\n\nThis Act may be cited as the Transport Operations (Marine Pollution) Act 1995 .","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"sec.2","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.2\n\ns 2 amd 2000 No. 6 s 40 (retro); 2001 No. 79 s 44A\nom 2002 No. 15 s 32","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"pt.1-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Act’s overall purpose","content":"## Act’s overall purpose","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"sec.3","sectionType":"section","heading":"Overall purpose","content":"### sec.3 Overall purpose\n\nThe overall purpose of this Act is to protect Queensland’s marine and coastal environment by minimising deliberate and negligent discharges of ship-sourced pollutants into coastal waters.\nThis purpose is to be achieved primarily by giving effect to relevant provisions of the following annexes of MARPOL—\nAnnex I (which deals with pollution by oil)\nAnnex II (which deals with pollution by noxious liquid substances in bulk)\nAnnex III (which deals with pollution by harmful substances in packaged form)\nAnnex IV (which deals with pollution by sewage)\nAnnex V (which deals with pollution by garbage).\nThe purpose is also to be achieved by—\nproviding an approach to protecting Queensland’s marine and coastal environment from ship-sourced pollutants complementary to the approach of the Commonwealth and the other States; and\nmaking provision about the discharge of sewage from ships; and\ngiving power to deal with shipping casualties that are polluting, or threatening to pollute, coastal waters; and\nenhancing, through education processes, industry and community awareness of the effects of ship-sourced pollutants on Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and\nproviding for the imposition of severe penalties on persons who pollute Queensland’s marine and coastal environment in contravention of this Act.\ns 3 amd 2002 No. 15 s 33\n(sec.3-ssec.1) The overall purpose of this Act is to protect Queensland’s marine and coastal environment by minimising deliberate and negligent discharges of ship-sourced pollutants into coastal waters.\n(sec.3-ssec.2) This purpose is to be achieved primarily by giving effect to relevant provisions of the following annexes of MARPOL— Annex I (which deals with pollution by oil) Annex II (which deals with pollution by noxious liquid substances in bulk) Annex III (which deals with pollution by harmful substances in packaged form) Annex IV (which deals with pollution by sewage) Annex V (which deals with pollution by garbage).\n(sec.3-ssec.3) The purpose is also to be achieved by— providing an approach to protecting Queensland’s marine and coastal environment from ship-sourced pollutants complementary to the approach of the Commonwealth and the other States; and making provision about the discharge of sewage from ships; and giving power to deal with shipping casualties that are polluting, or threatening to pollute, coastal waters; and enhancing, through education processes, industry and community awareness of the effects of ship-sourced pollutants on Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and providing for the imposition of severe penalties on persons who pollute Queensland’s marine and coastal environment in contravention of this Act.\n- • Annex I (which deals with pollution by oil)\n- • Annex II (which deals with pollution by noxious liquid substances in bulk)\n- • Annex III (which deals with pollution by harmful substances in packaged form)\n- • Annex IV (which deals with pollution by sewage)\n- • Annex V (which deals with pollution by garbage).\n- (a) providing an approach to protecting Queensland’s marine and coastal environment from ship-sourced pollutants complementary to the approach of the Commonwealth and the other States; and\n- (b) making provision about the discharge of sewage from ships; and\n- (c) giving power to deal with shipping casualties that are polluting, or threatening to pollute, coastal waters; and\n- (d) enhancing, through education processes, industry and community awareness of the effects of ship-sourced pollutants on Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and\n- (e) providing for the imposition of severe penalties on persons who pollute Queensland’s marine and coastal environment in contravention of this Act.","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"pt.1-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Interpretation","content":"## Interpretation","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"sec.4","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions—the dictionary","content":"### sec.4 Definitions—the dictionary\n\nA dictionary in schedule 1 defines particular words used in this Act.\nDefinitions found elsewhere in the Act are signposted in the dictionary.\ns 4 amd 2016 No. 3 s 76 sch 1\n(sec.4-ssec.1) A dictionary in schedule 1 defines particular words used in this Act.\n(sec.4-ssec.2) Definitions found elsewhere in the Act are signposted in the dictionary.","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"sec.5","sectionType":"section","heading":"Words and expressions used in MARPOL and this Act","content":"### sec.5 Words and expressions used in MARPOL and this Act\n\nWords and expressions used in MARPOL (other than in an annex) and this Act have the same meanings in this Act they have in MARPOL.\nSubsection (1) applies—\nwhether or not a particular word or expression is defined in MARPOL; and\nsubject to sections 25 , 34 , 41 , 46 , 54 and 60 .\nExcept as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in MARPOL (other than in an annex) and this Act—\nthis Act’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under MARPOL; and\nthe definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the MARPOL definition is displaced.\ns 5 amd 2006 No. 21 s 9\n(sec.5-ssec.1) Words and expressions used in MARPOL (other than in an annex) and this Act have the same meanings in this Act they have in MARPOL.\n(sec.5-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies— whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in MARPOL; and subject to sections 25 , 34 , 41 , 46 , 54 and 60 .\n(sec.5-ssec.3) Except as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in MARPOL (other than in an annex) and this Act— this Act’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under MARPOL; and the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the MARPOL definition is displaced.\n- (a) whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in MARPOL; and\n- (b) subject to sections 25 , 34 , 41 , 46 , 54 and 60 .\n- (a) this Act’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under MARPOL; and\n- (b) the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the MARPOL definition is displaced.","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"sec.6","sectionType":"section","heading":"Meaning of MARPOL","content":"### sec.6 Meaning of MARPOL\n\nMARPOL is the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973—\nas corrected by the procés-verbal of rectification dated 13 June 1978; and\nas modified and added to by the 1978 Protocol; and\nas affected by any amendment made under article 16 of the Convention and that has entered force for Australia.\nAt the commencement of this note, the text of MARPOL is accessible through the Australian Maritime Safety Authority website at http://www.amsa.gov.au.\nIn this section—\n1978 Protocol means the Protocol of 1978 relating to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as affected by any amendment made under article VI of the Protocol that has entered force for Australia.\ns 6 amd 2008 No. 67 s 239\n(sec.6-ssec.1) MARPOL is the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973— as corrected by the procés-verbal of rectification dated 13 June 1978; and as modified and added to by the 1978 Protocol; and as affected by any amendment made under article 16 of the Convention and that has entered force for Australia. At the commencement of this note, the text of MARPOL is accessible through the Australian Maritime Safety Authority website at http://www.amsa.gov.au.\n(sec.6-ssec.2) In this section— 1978 Protocol means the Protocol of 1978 relating to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as affected by any amendment made under article VI of the Protocol that has entered force for Australia.\n- (a) as corrected by the procés-verbal of rectification dated 13 June 1978; and\n- (b) as modified and added to by the 1978 Protocol; and\n- (c) as affected by any amendment made under article 16 of the Convention and that has entered force for Australia.","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"sec.7","sectionType":"section","heading":"Meaning of agent","content":"### sec.7 Meaning of agent\n\nAn agent of a ship owner is the person who, for the owner—\nperforms a function under the Marine Safety Act or the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 , chapter 8 ; or\nperforms a function under the domestic commercial vessel national law; or\nmakes an arrangement for berthing the ship, or loading or unloading cargo on or from the ship, in the State; or\nmakes an arrangement for the ship to load bunkers or stores in the State.\nThe person remains the ship owner’s agent until—\nthe person, or the ship owner, gives the general manager written notice that the person is no longer the ship’s agent; or\nsomeone else in the State is appointed by the ship owner as agent; or\nthe ship goes outside coastal waters.\nIf subsection (2) (a) and (b) do not apply, the person again becomes the ship owner’s agent when the ship returns to coastal waters.\ns 7 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch ; 2016 No. 3 s 68\n(sec.7-ssec.1) An agent of a ship owner is the person who, for the owner— performs a function under the Marine Safety Act or the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 , chapter 8 ; or performs a function under the domestic commercial vessel national law; or makes an arrangement for berthing the ship, or loading or unloading cargo on or from the ship, in the State; or makes an arrangement for the ship to load bunkers or stores in the State.\n(sec.7-ssec.2) The person remains the ship owner’s agent until— the person, or the ship owner, gives the general manager written notice that the person is no longer the ship’s agent; or someone else in the State is appointed by the ship owner as agent; or the ship goes outside coastal waters.\n(sec.7-ssec.3) If subsection (2) (a) and (b) do not apply, the person again becomes the ship owner’s agent when the ship returns to coastal waters.\n- (a) performs a function under the Marine Safety Act or the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 , chapter 8 ; or\n- (b) performs a function under the domestic commercial vessel national law; or\n- (c) makes an arrangement for berthing the ship, or loading or unloading cargo on or from the ship, in the State; or\n- (d) makes an arrangement for the ship to load bunkers or stores in the State.\n- (a) the person, or the ship owner, gives the general manager written notice that the person is no longer the ship’s agent; or\n- (b) someone else in the State is appointed by the ship owner as agent; or\n- (c) the ship goes outside coastal waters.","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"sec.7A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Meaning of length overall","content":"### sec.7A Meaning of length overall\n\nThe length overall of a ship is the distance in the fore and aft line from the foremost part of the hull of the ship to the aftermost part of the hull of the ship taken at the upper weather tight deck or, for an open ship, at the height of the gunwale.\nHowever, the length overall of the ship does not include the length of appendages to the hull.\nA bowsprit or boarding platform is not taken into account when measuring the length overall of a ship.\ns 7A ins 2002 No. 15 s 34\n(sec.7A-ssec.1) The length overall of a ship is the distance in the fore and aft line from the foremost part of the hull of the ship to the aftermost part of the hull of the ship taken at the upper weather tight deck or, for an open ship, at the height of the gunwale.\n(sec.7A-ssec.2) However, the length overall of the ship does not include the length of appendages to the hull. A bowsprit or boarding platform is not taken into account when measuring the length overall of a ship.","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"pt.1-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Operation of Act","content":"## Operation of Act","sortOrder":12},{"sectionNumber":"sec.8","sectionType":"section","heading":"Act binds all persons","content":"### sec.8 Act binds all persons\n\nThis Act binds all persons, including the State, and, so far as the legislative power of the Parliament permits, the Commonwealth and the other States.","sortOrder":13},{"sectionNumber":"sec.9","sectionType":"section","heading":"Discharge outside coastal waters that enters coastal waters","content":"### sec.9 Discharge outside coastal waters that enters coastal waters\n\nThe discharge of a pollutant, whether or not in packaged form, that happens outside coastal waters is taken to be a discharge into coastal waters under this Act if the discharged pollutant enters coastal waters.\nThe discharge is taken to happen when the discharged pollutant enters coastal waters.\n(sec.9-ssec.1) The discharge of a pollutant, whether or not in packaged form, that happens outside coastal waters is taken to be a discharge into coastal waters under this Act if the discharged pollutant enters coastal waters.\n(sec.9-ssec.2) The discharge is taken to happen when the discharged pollutant enters coastal waters.","sortOrder":14},{"sectionNumber":"pt.2","sectionType":"part","heading":"Information about this Act","content":"# Information about this Act","sortOrder":15},{"sectionNumber":"sec.10","sectionType":"section","heading":"Why this Act was enacted","content":"### sec.10 Why this Act was enacted\n\nIn 1973, the international community responded to worldwide concern about the threat to the marine environment and coastlines posed by the discharge of ship-sourced pollutants.\nThe international community’s response was the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973.\nThe Convention, for the first time, set international standards for the proper construction of ships designed to carry oil and noxious substances and laid down rules about the level of discharges that may be made into the sea without risk to the marine environment.\nThe Convention, as amended, is known as MARPOL.\nSee section 6 for the precise meaning of MARPOL for this Act.\nMARPOL was ratified by Australia in 1987.\nThis Act gives effect to MARPOL by—\nenacting as part of Queensland’s law provisions to give effect to relevant provisions of MARPOL; and\nproviding a legislative framework in which the provisions can be enforced.\nThis approach complements the approach adopted by the Commonwealth and the other States.\ns 10 amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.10-ssec.1) In 1973, the international community responded to worldwide concern about the threat to the marine environment and coastlines posed by the discharge of ship-sourced pollutants.\n(sec.10-ssec.2) The international community’s response was the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973.\n(sec.10-ssec.3) The Convention, for the first time, set international standards for the proper construction of ships designed to carry oil and noxious substances and laid down rules about the level of discharges that may be made into the sea without risk to the marine environment.\n(sec.10-ssec.4) The Convention, as amended, is known as MARPOL. See section 6 for the precise meaning of MARPOL for this Act.\n(sec.10-ssec.5) MARPOL was ratified by Australia in 1987.\n(sec.10-ssec.6) This Act gives effect to MARPOL by— enacting as part of Queensland’s law provisions to give effect to relevant provisions of MARPOL; and providing a legislative framework in which the provisions can be enforced.\n(sec.10-ssec.7) This approach complements the approach adopted by the Commonwealth and the other States.\n- (a) enacting as part of Queensland’s law provisions to give effect to relevant provisions of MARPOL; and\n- (b) providing a legislative framework in which the provisions can be enforced.","sortOrder":16},{"sectionNumber":"sec.11","sectionType":"section","heading":"Queensland’s jurisdiction","content":"### sec.11 Queensland’s jurisdiction\n\nThe body of law governing Australian waters is extremely complex and this section is intended to provide only a very general overview of the State’s jurisdiction in the territorial sea.\nQueensland’s jurisdiction in the territorial sea is limited under the Coastal Waters (State Powers) Act 1980 (Cwlth) .\nBecause of this limitation, this Act only deals with discharges from ships that happen, or are taken to happen, in the first 3n miles of the territorial sea and other coastal waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.\nThese waters are referred to as coastal waters in this Act.\nSee the dictionary in the schedule for the precise meaning of coastal waters for this Act.\nWaters beyond the 3n mile limit come under Commonwealth jurisdiction to the extent that Australia has jurisdiction.\ns 11 amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.11-ssec.1) The body of law governing Australian waters is extremely complex and this section is intended to provide only a very general overview of the State’s jurisdiction in the territorial sea.\n(sec.11-ssec.2) Queensland’s jurisdiction in the territorial sea is limited under the Coastal Waters (State Powers) Act 1980 (Cwlth) .\n(sec.11-ssec.3) Because of this limitation, this Act only deals with discharges from ships that happen, or are taken to happen, in the first 3n miles of the territorial sea and other coastal waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.\n(sec.11-ssec.4) These waters are referred to as coastal waters in this Act. See the dictionary in the schedule for the precise meaning of coastal waters for this Act.\n(sec.11-ssec.5) Waters beyond the 3n mile limit come under Commonwealth jurisdiction to the extent that Australia has jurisdiction.","sortOrder":17},{"sectionNumber":"sec.12","sectionType":"section","heading":"The ships this Act applies to","content":"### sec.12 The ships this Act applies to\n\nThis Act applies to all ships in coastal waters.","sortOrder":18},{"sectionNumber":"sec.13","sectionType":"section","heading":"Ship’s general safety obligations, surveying and registration","content":"### sec.13 Ship’s general safety obligations, surveying and registration\n\nGeneral safety duties for domestic commercial vessels and issues about their survey and certification are generally dealt with under the domestic commercial vessel national law.\nGeneral safety obligations for Queensland regulated ships and issues about their survey and registration are generally dealt with under the Marine Safety Act .\ns 13 sub 2016 No. 3 s 69\n(sec.13-ssec.1) General safety duties for domestic commercial vessels and issues about their survey and certification are generally dealt with under the domestic commercial vessel national law.\n(sec.13-ssec.2) General safety obligations for Queensland regulated ships and issues about their survey and registration are generally dealt with under the Marine Safety Act .","sortOrder":19},{"sectionNumber":"sec.14","sectionType":"section","heading":"How this Act interacts with other environmental laws","content":"### sec.14 How this Act interacts with other environmental laws\n\nThis Act deals with the discharge of pollutants into coastal waters happening from ships or because of transfer operations involving ships.\nIf a pollutant is discharged into coastal waters from another source, other environmental laws may apply.\nSee, for example, the Environmental Protection Act 1994 .\ns 14 amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.14-ssec.1) This Act deals with the discharge of pollutants into coastal waters happening from ships or because of transfer operations involving ships.\n(sec.14-ssec.2) If a pollutant is discharged into coastal waters from another source, other environmental laws may apply. See, for example, the Environmental Protection Act 1994 .","sortOrder":20},{"sectionNumber":"pt.3","sectionType":"part","heading":null,"content":"","sortOrder":21},{"sectionNumber":"pt.3-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":null,"content":"","sortOrder":22},{"sectionNumber":"sec.15","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.15\n\ns 15 om 2016 No. 3 s 70","sortOrder":23},{"sectionNumber":"sec.16","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.16\n\ns 16 om 2016 No. 3 s 70","sortOrder":24},{"sectionNumber":"pt.3-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":null,"content":"","sortOrder":25},{"sectionNumber":"sec.17","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.17\n\ns 17 amd 2010 No. 19 s 133\nom 2016 No. 3 s 70","sortOrder":26},{"sectionNumber":"sec.18","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.18\n\ns 18 om 2016 No. 3 s 70","sortOrder":27},{"sectionNumber":"sec.19","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.19\n\ns 19 om 2016 No. 3 s 70","sortOrder":28},{"sectionNumber":"pt.3-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":null,"content":"","sortOrder":29},{"sectionNumber":"sec.20","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.20\n\ns 20 om 2016 No. 3 s 70","sortOrder":30},{"sectionNumber":"sec.21","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.21\n\ns 21 om 2016 No. 3 s 70","sortOrder":31},{"sectionNumber":"sec.22","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.22\n\ns 22 om 2016 No. 3 s 70","sortOrder":32},{"sectionNumber":"pt.4","sectionType":"part","heading":"Prevention of pollution by oil","content":"# Prevention of pollution by oil","sortOrder":33},{"sectionNumber":"pt.4-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Purpose of part","content":"## Purpose of part","sortOrder":34},{"sectionNumber":"sec.23","sectionType":"section","heading":"Part gives effect to Annex I to MARPOL","content":"### sec.23 Part gives effect to Annex I to MARPOL\n\nThe purpose of this part is to give effect to relevant provisions of Annex I to MARPOL.","sortOrder":35},{"sectionNumber":"pt.4-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Interpretation","content":"## Interpretation","sortOrder":36},{"sectionNumber":"sec.24","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for part","content":"### sec.24 Definitions for part\n\nIn this part—\ndischarge offence means an offence against section 26 (1) or 27 (1) .\noil includes an oily mixture.","sortOrder":37},{"sectionNumber":"sec.25","sectionType":"section","heading":"Words and expressions used in Annex I to MARPOL and this part","content":"### sec.25 Words and expressions used in Annex I to MARPOL and this part\n\nWords and expressions used in Annex I to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\nSubsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex I.\nExcept as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex I to MARPOL and this part—\nthis part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex I; and\nthe definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex I definition is displaced.\n(sec.25-ssec.1) Words and expressions used in Annex I to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\n(sec.25-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex I.\n(sec.25-ssec.3) Except as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex I to MARPOL and this part— this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex I; and the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex I definition is displaced.\n- (a) this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex I; and\n- (b) the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex I definition is displaced.","sortOrder":38},{"sectionNumber":"pt.4-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Discharge of oil prohibited","content":"## Discharge of oil prohibited","sortOrder":39},{"sectionNumber":"sec.26","sectionType":"section","heading":"Discharge of oil into coastal waters prohibited","content":"### sec.26 Discharge of oil into coastal waters prohibited\n\nIf oil is discharged from a ship into coastal waters, the following persons each commit an offence—\nthe ship’s owner;\nthe ship’s master;\nanother member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the discharge, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.\nMaximum penalty—\nfor an individual—5,000 penalty units; or\nfor a corporation—100,000 penalty units.\nSubsection (1) applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\nThe Criminal Code , section 23 deals with a person’s criminal responsibility for an act or omission that happens independently of the person’s will or for an event which is accidental. The Criminal Code , section 24 deals with a person’s criminal responsibility for an act or omission done under an honest and reasonable, but mistaken, belief in the state of things.\ns 26 amd 2001 No. 79 s 45 ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch ; 2010 No. 19 s 224\n(sec.26-ssec.1) If oil is discharged from a ship into coastal waters, the following persons each commit an offence— the ship’s owner; the ship’s master; another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the discharge, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction. Maximum penalty— for an individual—5,000 penalty units; or for a corporation—100,000 penalty units.\n(sec.26-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 . The Criminal Code , section 23 deals with a person’s criminal responsibility for an act or omission that happens independently of the person’s will or for an event which is accidental. The Criminal Code , section 24 deals with a person’s criminal responsibility for an act or omission done under an honest and reasonable, but mistaken, belief in the state of things.\n- (a) the ship’s owner;\n- (b) the ship’s master;\n- (c) another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the discharge, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.\n- (a) for an individual—5,000 penalty units; or\n- (b) for a corporation—100,000 penalty units.","sortOrder":40},{"sectionNumber":"sec.27","sectionType":"section","heading":"Oil residues","content":"### sec.27 Oil residues\n\nIf any oil residues that cannot be discharged from a ship without contravening section 26 (1) are not retained on board the ship while the ship is in coastal waters, the ship’s master and owner each commit an offence.\nA ship leaves port A with a quantity of oil residues held in a tank or space and, without leaving coastal waters, arrives at port B with a lesser quantity in the tank or space. This subsection places an onus on the ship’s master to explain why there is a discrepancy in the quantity.\nMaximum penalty—\nfor an individual—5,000 penalty units; or\nfor a corporation—100,000 penalty units.\nIf an event contravenes subsection (1) and section 26 (1) , the ship’s owner and master cannot be punished for the event under both provisions.\ns 27 amd 1995 No. 50 s 3 sch ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch ; 2010 No. 19 s 225\n(sec.27-ssec.1) If any oil residues that cannot be discharged from a ship without contravening section 26 (1) are not retained on board the ship while the ship is in coastal waters, the ship’s master and owner each commit an offence. A ship leaves port A with a quantity of oil residues held in a tank or space and, without leaving coastal waters, arrives at port B with a lesser quantity in the tank or space. This subsection places an onus on the ship’s master to explain why there is a discrepancy in the quantity. Maximum penalty— for an individual—5,000 penalty units; or for a corporation—100,000 penalty units.\n(sec.27-ssec.2) If an event contravenes subsection (1) and section 26 (1) , the ship’s owner and master cannot be punished for the event under both provisions.\n- (a) for an individual—5,000 penalty units; or\n- (b) for a corporation—100,000 penalty units.","sortOrder":41},{"sectionNumber":"pt.4-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Defences","content":"## Defences","sortOrder":42},{"sectionNumber":"sec.28","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defences to discharge offence","content":"### sec.28 Defences to discharge offence\n\nEach of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence—\nthe discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea;\nthe discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge of the oil;\nfor an oily mixture—the discharge was made to combat specific pollution incidents to minimise the damage from pollution and was approved by an authorised officer;\nthe discharge was authorised by an authorised officer for training purposes.\nFor subsection (1) (b) , damage to a ship or its equipment is intentional damage only if the damage arose in circumstances in which the ship’s owner or master or, for a discharge offence against section 26 (1) , another member of the ship’s crew—\nacted with intent to cause damage; or\nacted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.\ns 28 amd 2001 No. 79 s 46 ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.28-ssec.1) Each of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence— the discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea; the discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge of the oil; for an oily mixture—the discharge was made to combat specific pollution incidents to minimise the damage from pollution and was approved by an authorised officer; the discharge was authorised by an authorised officer for training purposes.\n(sec.28-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (b) , damage to a ship or its equipment is intentional damage only if the damage arose in circumstances in which the ship’s owner or master or, for a discharge offence against section 26 (1) , another member of the ship’s crew— acted with intent to cause damage; or acted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.\n- (a) the discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea;\n- (b) the discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge of the oil;\n- (c) for an oily mixture—the discharge was made to combat specific pollution incidents to minimise the damage from pollution and was approved by an authorised officer;\n- (d) the discharge was authorised by an authorised officer for training purposes.\n- (a) acted with intent to cause damage; or\n- (b) acted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.","sortOrder":43},{"sectionNumber":"pt.4-div.5","sectionType":"division","heading":"Exemptions","content":"## Exemptions","sortOrder":44},{"sectionNumber":"sec.29","sectionType":"section","heading":"Certain discharges permissible","content":"### sec.29 Certain discharges permissible\n\nThe regulations may exempt discharges from the operation of the discharge offences.\nHowever, a regulation may be made only if it gives effect to an exemption allowed under MARPOL.\nThe regulations may prescribe that oil may be discharged outside specified areas, at a rate and under conditions prescribed under MARPOL. A discharge made outside the area, at the prescribed rate and under the prescribed conditions does not contravene this Act.\n(sec.29-ssec.1) The regulations may exempt discharges from the operation of the discharge offences.\n(sec.29-ssec.2) However, a regulation may be made only if it gives effect to an exemption allowed under MARPOL. The regulations may prescribe that oil may be discharged outside specified areas, at a rate and under conditions prescribed under MARPOL. A discharge made outside the area, at the prescribed rate and under the prescribed conditions does not contravene this Act.","sortOrder":45},{"sectionNumber":"pt.4-div.6","sectionType":"division","heading":"General","content":"## General","sortOrder":46},{"sectionNumber":"sec.30","sectionType":"section","heading":"Shipboard oil pollution emergency plan","content":"### sec.30 Shipboard oil pollution emergency plan\n\nIf a ship does not have on board a shipboard oil pollution emergency plan, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nIf a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\nIn this section—\nship means a ship—\nmore than 24m in length overall if the ship is carrying—\noil as cargo; or\na vehicle that is carrying more than 400L of oil as cargo; or\notherwise, more than 35m in length overall.\ns 30 amd 1995 No. 50 s 3 sch ; 2001 No. 79 s 47\nins 2013 No. 51 s 229 sch 1\n(sec.30-ssec.1) If a ship does not have on board a shipboard oil pollution emergency plan, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units. If a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\n(sec.30-ssec.2) In this section— ship means a ship— more than 24m in length overall if the ship is carrying— oil as cargo; or a vehicle that is carrying more than 400L of oil as cargo; or otherwise, more than 35m in length overall.\n- (a) more than 24m in length overall if the ship is carrying— (i) oil as cargo; or (ii) a vehicle that is carrying more than 400L of oil as cargo; or\n- (i) oil as cargo; or\n- (ii) a vehicle that is carrying more than 400L of oil as cargo; or\n- (b) otherwise, more than 35m in length overall.\n- (i) oil as cargo; or\n- (ii) a vehicle that is carrying more than 400L of oil as cargo; or","sortOrder":47},{"sectionNumber":"pt.5","sectionType":"part","heading":"Prevention of pollution by noxious liquid substances in bulk","content":"# Prevention of pollution by noxious liquid substances in bulk","sortOrder":48},{"sectionNumber":"pt.5-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Purpose and application of part","content":"## Purpose and application of part","sortOrder":49},{"sectionNumber":"sec.31","sectionType":"section","heading":"Part gives effect to Annex II to MARPOL","content":"### sec.31 Part gives effect to Annex II to MARPOL\n\nThe purpose of this part is to give effect to relevant provisions of Annex II to MARPOL.","sortOrder":50},{"sectionNumber":"sec.32","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of part","content":"### sec.32 Application of part\n\nThis part applies to all ships carrying noxious liquid substances in bulk.","sortOrder":51},{"sectionNumber":"pt.5-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Interpretation","content":"## Interpretation","sortOrder":52},{"sectionNumber":"sec.33","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for part","content":"### sec.33 Definitions for part\n\nIn this part—\nAnnex II ...\ns 33 def Annex II om 2007 No. 43 s 9 (1)\ndischarge offence means an offence against section 35 (1) .\nmixture includes ballast water, tank washings and bilge and other residues.\nnoxious liquid substance —\nincludes a mixture containing a noxious liquid substance; and\ndoes not include a liquid substance declared under a regulation not to be a noxious liquid substance.\ns 33 def noxious liquid substance sub 2007 No. 43 s 9\noil has the meaning it has in part 4 .\n- (a) includes a mixture containing a noxious liquid substance; and\n- (b) does not include a liquid substance declared under a regulation not to be a noxious liquid substance.","sortOrder":53},{"sectionNumber":"sec.34","sectionType":"section","heading":"Words and expressions used in Annex II to MARPOL and this part","content":"### sec.34 Words and expressions used in Annex II to MARPOL and this part\n\nWords and expressions used in Annex II to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\nSubsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex II.\nExcept as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex II to MARPOL and this part—\nthis part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex II; and\nthe definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex II definition is displaced.\n(sec.34-ssec.1) Words and expressions used in Annex II to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\n(sec.34-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex II.\n(sec.34-ssec.3) Except as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex II to MARPOL and this part— this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex II; and the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex II definition is displaced.\n- (a) this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex II; and\n- (b) the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex II definition is displaced.","sortOrder":54},{"sectionNumber":"sec.34A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Recategorisation of substances","content":"### sec.34A Recategorisation of substances\n\nA regulation may declare a category X substance, category Y substance, category Z substance or Other substance to be a substance of a different stated category.\nA regulation under subsection (1) has effect to categorise the substance for this Act despite the substance being differently categorised under the International Bulk Chemical Code.\ns 34A ins 2007 No. 43 s 10\namd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.34A-ssec.1) A regulation may declare a category X substance, category Y substance, category Z substance or Other substance to be a substance of a different stated category.\n(sec.34A-ssec.2) A regulation under subsection (1) has effect to categorise the substance for this Act despite the substance being differently categorised under the International Bulk Chemical Code.","sortOrder":55},{"sectionNumber":"pt.5-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Discharge of noxious liquid substances prohibited","content":"## Discharge of noxious liquid substances prohibited","sortOrder":56},{"sectionNumber":"sec.35","sectionType":"section","heading":"Discharge of noxious liquid substances into coastal waters prohibited","content":"### sec.35 Discharge of noxious liquid substances into coastal waters prohibited\n\nIf a noxious liquid substance is discharged from a ship into coastal waters, the following persons each commit an offence—\nthe ship’s owner;\nthe ship’s master;\nanother member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the discharge, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.\nMaximum penalty—\nfor an individual—5,000 penalty units; or\nfor a corporation—100,000 penalty units.\nSubsection (1) applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\nSee the note to section 26 (2) for information about sections 23 and 24 of the Code .\ns 35 amd 2001 No. 79 s 48 ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch ; 2010 No. 19 s 226\n(sec.35-ssec.1) If a noxious liquid substance is discharged from a ship into coastal waters, the following persons each commit an offence— the ship’s owner; the ship’s master; another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the discharge, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction. Maximum penalty— for an individual—5,000 penalty units; or for a corporation—100,000 penalty units.\n(sec.35-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 . See the note to section 26 (2) for information about sections 23 and 24 of the Code .\n- (a) the ship’s owner;\n- (b) the ship’s master;\n- (c) another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the discharge, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.\n- (a) for an individual—5,000 penalty units; or\n- (b) for a corporation—100,000 penalty units.","sortOrder":57},{"sectionNumber":"pt.5-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Defences","content":"## Defences","sortOrder":58},{"sectionNumber":"sec.36","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defences to discharge offence","content":"### sec.36 Defences to discharge offence\n\nEach of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence—\nthe discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea;\nthe discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge of the noxious liquid substance;\nthe discharge was for the purpose of combating specific pollution incidents to minimise the damage from pollution and was approved by an authorised officer.\nSee Annex II, regulation 3.\nFor subsection (1) (b) , damage to a ship or its equipment is taken to be intentional damage only if the damage arose in circumstances in which the ship’s owner, master or other member of the ship’s crew—\nacted with intent to cause damage; or\nacted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.\ns 36 amd 2001 No. 79 s 49 ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.36-ssec.1) Each of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence— the discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea; the discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge of the noxious liquid substance; the discharge was for the purpose of combating specific pollution incidents to minimise the damage from pollution and was approved by an authorised officer. See Annex II, regulation 3.\n(sec.36-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (b) , damage to a ship or its equipment is taken to be intentional damage only if the damage arose in circumstances in which the ship’s owner, master or other member of the ship’s crew— acted with intent to cause damage; or acted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.\n- (a) the discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea;\n- (b) the discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge of the noxious liquid substance;\n- (c) the discharge was for the purpose of combating specific pollution incidents to minimise the damage from pollution and was approved by an authorised officer.\n- (a) acted with intent to cause damage; or\n- (b) acted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.","sortOrder":59},{"sectionNumber":"pt.5-div.5","sectionType":"division","heading":"Exemptions","content":"## Exemptions","sortOrder":60},{"sectionNumber":"sec.37","sectionType":"section","heading":"Certain discharges permissible","content":"### sec.37 Certain discharges permissible\n\nThe regulations may exempt discharges from the operation of the discharge offence.\nHowever, a regulation may be made only if it gives effect to an exemption allowed under MARPOL.\nThe regulations may prescribe that noxious liquid substances may be discharged outside specified areas, at a rate and under conditions prescribed under MARPOL. A discharge made outside the area, at the prescribed rate and under the prescribed conditions does not contravene this Act.\n(sec.37-ssec.1) The regulations may exempt discharges from the operation of the discharge offence.\n(sec.37-ssec.2) However, a regulation may be made only if it gives effect to an exemption allowed under MARPOL. The regulations may prescribe that noxious liquid substances may be discharged outside specified areas, at a rate and under conditions prescribed under MARPOL. A discharge made outside the area, at the prescribed rate and under the prescribed conditions does not contravene this Act.","sortOrder":61},{"sectionNumber":"pt.5-div.6","sectionType":"division","heading":"General","content":"## General","sortOrder":62},{"sectionNumber":"sec.38","sectionType":"section","heading":"Procedures and arrangements manual","content":"### sec.38 Procedures and arrangements manual\n\nIf a ship certified to carry noxious liquid substances category X, Y or Z does not have on board a procedures and arrangements manual, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\nIf a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\nIn this section—\nprocedures and arrangements manual means a Procedures and Arrangements Manual as defined in the Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983 (Cwlth) , section 15 .\ns 38 amd 1995 No. 50 s 3 sch ; 2007 No. 43 s 11\nsub 2008 No. 67 s 240\namd 2013 No. 51 s 229 sch 1\n(sec.38-ssec.1) If a ship certified to carry noxious liquid substances category X, Y or Z does not have on board a procedures and arrangements manual, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units. If a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\n(sec.38-ssec.2) In this section— procedures and arrangements manual means a Procedures and Arrangements Manual as defined in the Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983 (Cwlth) , section 15 .","sortOrder":63},{"sectionNumber":"sec.38A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Shipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious liquid substances","content":"### sec.38A Shipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious liquid substances\n\nIf a prescribed ship does not have on board a shipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious substances, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nIf a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\nA regulation may prescribe minimum requirements for a shipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious substances.\nIn this section—\nprescribed ship means a ship—\nwith a gross tonnage of 150 or more; and\ncertified to carry noxious liquid substances.\nshipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious substances means a shipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious substances complying with the Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983 (Cwlth) , section 22A .\ns 38A ins 2008 No. 67 s 240 ; 2013 No. 51 s 229 sch 1\n(sec.38A-ssec.1) If a prescribed ship does not have on board a shipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious substances, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units. If a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\n(sec.38A-ssec.2) A regulation may prescribe minimum requirements for a shipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious substances.\n(sec.38A-ssec.3) In this section— prescribed ship means a ship— with a gross tonnage of 150 or more; and certified to carry noxious liquid substances. shipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious substances means a shipboard marine pollution emergency plan for noxious substances complying with the Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983 (Cwlth) , section 22A .\n- (a) with a gross tonnage of 150 or more; and\n- (b) certified to carry noxious liquid substances.","sortOrder":64},{"sectionNumber":"pt.6","sectionType":"part","heading":"Prevention of pollution by packaged harmful substances","content":"# Prevention of pollution by packaged harmful substances","sortOrder":65},{"sectionNumber":"pt.6-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Purpose of part","content":"## Purpose of part","sortOrder":66},{"sectionNumber":"sec.39","sectionType":"section","heading":"Part gives effect to Annex III to MARPOL","content":"### sec.39 Part gives effect to Annex III to MARPOL\n\nThe purpose of this part is to give effect to relevant provisions of Annex III to MARPOL.","sortOrder":67},{"sectionNumber":"pt.6-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Interpretation","content":"## Interpretation","sortOrder":68},{"sectionNumber":"sec.40","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for part","content":"### sec.40 Definitions for part\n\nIn this part—\ndischarge offence means an offence against section 42 (1) .\nharmful substance see the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code.\ns 40 def harmful substance amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch","sortOrder":69},{"sectionNumber":"sec.41","sectionType":"section","heading":"Words and expressions used in Annex III to MARPOL and this part","content":"### sec.41 Words and expressions used in Annex III to MARPOL and this part\n\nWords and expressions used in Annex III to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\nSubsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex III.\nExcept as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex III to MARPOL and this part—\nthis part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex III; and\nthe definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex III definition is displaced.\n(sec.41-ssec.1) Words and expressions used in Annex III to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\n(sec.41-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex III.\n(sec.41-ssec.3) Except as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex III to MARPOL and this part— this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex III; and the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex III definition is displaced.\n- (a) this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex III; and\n- (b) the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex III definition is displaced.","sortOrder":70},{"sectionNumber":"pt.6-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Jettisoning of harmful substance prohibited","content":"## Jettisoning of harmful substance prohibited","sortOrder":71},{"sectionNumber":"sec.42","sectionType":"section","heading":"Jettisoning of harmful substances into coastal waters prohibited","content":"### sec.42 Jettisoning of harmful substances into coastal waters prohibited\n\nIf a harmful substance carried as cargo in packaged form is jettisoned from a ship into coastal waters, the following persons each commit an offence—\nthe ship’s owner;\nthe ship’s master;\nanother member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the jettisoning, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.\nMaximum penalty—\nfor an individual—5,000 penalty units; or\nfor a corporation—100,000 penalty units.\nA harmful substance is taken to have been jettisoned if it is discharged into coastal waters because of a leakage of the substance.\nSubsection (1) applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\nSee the note to section 26 (2) for information about sections 23 and 24 of the Code .\ns 42 amd 2001 No. 79 s 50 ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch ; 2010 No. 19 s 227\n(sec.42-ssec.1) If a harmful substance carried as cargo in packaged form is jettisoned from a ship into coastal waters, the following persons each commit an offence— the ship’s owner; the ship’s master; another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the jettisoning, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction. Maximum penalty— for an individual—5,000 penalty units; or for a corporation—100,000 penalty units.\n(sec.42-ssec.2) A harmful substance is taken to have been jettisoned if it is discharged into coastal waters because of a leakage of the substance.\n(sec.42-ssec.3) Subsection (1) applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 . See the note to section 26 (2) for information about sections 23 and 24 of the Code .\n- (a) the ship’s owner;\n- (b) the ship’s master;\n- (c) another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the jettisoning, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.\n- (a) for an individual—5,000 penalty units; or\n- (b) for a corporation—100,000 penalty units.","sortOrder":72},{"sectionNumber":"pt.6-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Defences","content":"## Defences","sortOrder":73},{"sectionNumber":"sec.43","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defences to discharge offence","content":"### sec.43 Defences to discharge offence\n\nThe following are defences to a prosecution for a discharge offence—\nthe jettisoning was made for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea;\nif the jettisoning was the washing of leakages overboard—the jettisoning in accordance with procedures prescribed by regulation would have impaired the safety of the ship or persons on board the ship.\ns 43 amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n- (a) the jettisoning was made for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea;\n- (b) if the jettisoning was the washing of leakages overboard—the jettisoning in accordance with procedures prescribed by regulation would have impaired the safety of the ship or persons on board the ship.","sortOrder":74},{"sectionNumber":"pt.6-div.5","sectionType":"division","heading":"Exemptions","content":"## Exemptions","sortOrder":75},{"sectionNumber":"sec.44","sectionType":"section","heading":"Certain discharges permissible","content":"### sec.44 Certain discharges permissible\n\nThe regulations may exempt discharges from the operation of the discharge offence.","sortOrder":76},{"sectionNumber":"pt.7","sectionType":"part","heading":"Prevention of pollution by sewage","content":"# Prevention of pollution by sewage","sortOrder":77},{"sectionNumber":"pt.7-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Interpretation","content":"## Interpretation","sortOrder":78},{"sectionNumber":"sec.45","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for pt 7","content":"### sec.45 Definitions for pt 7\n\nIn this part—\nculpable person , for a discharge of treated sewage or untreated sewage from a ship, means—\nthe ship’s owner; or\nthe ship’s master; or\nanother member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the discharge, unless the member was acting under the direct supervision of the master or of someone authorised by the master for the purpose.\ndeclared ship see section 49 .\ndischarge offence means an offence against section 47 , 48 , 50 or 50A (2) , (3) or (4) .\ns 45 def discharge offence amd 2008 No. 67 s 241 ; 2010 No. 13 s 89\nsewage holding device means—\na container or receptacle that is designed or constructed to receive sewage and hold it inside the container or receptacle for disposal; or\na portable toilet or holding tank\na treatment system that is fitted with, or connected to, a container or receptacle mentioned in paragraph (a) .\ns 45 sub 2002 No. 15 s 36\n- (a) the ship’s owner; or\n- (b) the ship’s master; or\n- (c) another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the discharge, unless the member was acting under the direct supervision of the master or of someone authorised by the master for the purpose.\n- (a) a container or receptacle that is designed or constructed to receive sewage and hold it inside the container or receptacle for disposal; or Example for paragraph (a) — a portable toilet or holding tank\n- (b) a treatment system that is fitted with, or connected to, a container or receptacle mentioned in paragraph (a) .","sortOrder":79},{"sectionNumber":"sec.46","sectionType":"section","heading":"Words and expressions used in Annex IV to MARPOL and this part","content":"### sec.46 Words and expressions used in Annex IV to MARPOL and this part\n\nWords and expressions used in Annex IV to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\nSubsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex IV.\nExcept as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex IV to MARPOL and this part—\nthis part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex IV; and\nthe definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex IV definition is displaced.\ns 46 sub 2002 No. 15 s 36\n(sec.46-ssec.1) Words and expressions used in Annex IV to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\n(sec.46-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex IV.\n(sec.46-ssec.3) Except as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex IV to MARPOL and this part— this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex IV; and the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex IV definition is displaced.\n- (a) this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex IV; and\n- (b) the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex IV definition is displaced.","sortOrder":80},{"sectionNumber":"pt.7-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Discharge of sewage","content":"## Discharge of sewage","sortOrder":81},{"sectionNumber":"sec.47","sectionType":"section","heading":"Discharge of untreated sewage into nil discharge waters for untreated sewage prohibited","content":"### sec.47 Discharge of untreated sewage into nil discharge waters for untreated sewage prohibited\n\nIf untreated sewage is discharged from a ship into nil discharge waters for untreated sewage, each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nThe nil discharge waters for untreated sewage are the coastal waters prescribed under a regulation for this section.\nThis section applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\nSee the note to section 26 (2) for information about sections 23 and 24 of the Code .\nIn this section—\nship does not include—\na declared ship under section 49 ; or\na prescribed ship under section 50A .\ns 47 sub 2002 No. 15 s 36\namd 2010 No. 13 ss 88 sch , 89A\n(sec.47-ssec.1) If untreated sewage is discharged from a ship into nil discharge waters for untreated sewage, each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.47-ssec.2) The nil discharge waters for untreated sewage are the coastal waters prescribed under a regulation for this section.\n(sec.47-ssec.3) This section applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 . See the note to section 26 (2) for information about sections 23 and 24 of the Code .\n(sec.47-ssec.4) In this section— ship does not include— a declared ship under section 49 ; or a prescribed ship under section 50A .\n- (a) a declared ship under section 49 ; or\n- (b) a prescribed ship under section 50A .","sortOrder":82},{"sectionNumber":"sec.48","sectionType":"section","heading":"Discharge of treated sewage into nil discharge waters for treated sewage prohibited","content":"### sec.48 Discharge of treated sewage into nil discharge waters for treated sewage prohibited\n\nIf treated sewage is discharged from a ship into nil discharge waters for treated sewage, each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nThe nil discharge waters for treated sewage are the coastal waters prescribed under a regulation for this section.\nThis section applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\nIn this section—\nship does not include—\na declared ship under section 49 ; or\na prescribed ship under section 50A .\ns 48 sub 2002 No. 15 s 36\namd 2010 No. 13 s 89B\n(sec.48-ssec.1) If treated sewage is discharged from a ship into nil discharge waters for treated sewage, each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.48-ssec.2) The nil discharge waters for treated sewage are the coastal waters prescribed under a regulation for this section.\n(sec.48-ssec.3) This section applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\n(sec.48-ssec.4) In this section— ship does not include— a declared ship under section 49 ; or a prescribed ship under section 50A .\n- (a) a declared ship under section 49 ; or\n- (b) a prescribed ship under section 50A .","sortOrder":83},{"sectionNumber":"sec.48A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Ship with fixed toilet operating in prescribed nil discharge waters to be able to hold or treat sewage","content":"### sec.48A Ship with fixed toilet operating in prescribed nil discharge waters to be able to hold or treat sewage\n\nThe owner or master of a ship must not operate the ship in nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage from a ship, unless the owner or master complies with the requirements prescribed under a regulation in relation to the holding or treating of sewage on the ship.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nThe nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage from a ship are the coastal waters prescribed under a regulation for this section.\nThis section applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\nIn this section—\noperate , a ship, includes anchor, berth or moor the ship.\nship —\nmeans a ship that has a fixed toilet; and\ndoes not include—\na declared ship under section 49 ; or\na prescribed ship under section 50A .\ns 48A ins 2008 No. 31 s 27\namd 2008 No. 67 s 242 ; 2010 No. 13 s 89C ; 2010 No. 19 s 228\n(sec.48A-ssec.1) The owner or master of a ship must not operate the ship in nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage from a ship, unless the owner or master complies with the requirements prescribed under a regulation in relation to the holding or treating of sewage on the ship. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.48A-ssec.2) The nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage from a ship are the coastal waters prescribed under a regulation for this section.\n(sec.48A-ssec.3) This section applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\n(sec.48A-ssec.4) In this section— operate , a ship, includes anchor, berth or moor the ship. ship — means a ship that has a fixed toilet; and does not include— a declared ship under section 49 ; or a prescribed ship under section 50A .\n- (a) means a ship that has a fixed toilet; and\n- (b) does not include— (i) a declared ship under section 49 ; or (ii) a prescribed ship under section 50A .\n- (i) a declared ship under section 49 ; or\n- (ii) a prescribed ship under section 50A .\n- (i) a declared ship under section 49 ; or\n- (ii) a prescribed ship under section 50A .","sortOrder":84},{"sectionNumber":"sec.49","sectionType":"section","heading":"Declared ship operating in prescribed nil discharge waters to be fitted with sewage holding device","content":"### sec.49 Declared ship operating in prescribed nil discharge waters to be fitted with sewage holding device\n\nThe owner or master of a declared ship must not operate the declared ship in nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage from a declared ship, unless—\nthe declared ship is fitted with a sewage holding device; and\neach fixed toilet on the declared ship is connected to a sewage holding device.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nA declared ship is taken not to be fitted with a sewage holding device unless a sewage holding device fitted to the ship is appropriate having regard to—\nthe maximum number of persons the ship is permitted to carry under—\nfor a domestic commercial vessel—the domestic commercial vessel national law; or\nfor a Queensland regulated ship—the Marine Safety Act ; and\nthe duration of the ship’s journey in the nil discharge waters.\nThe nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage from a declared ship are the coastal waters prescribed under a regulation for this section.\nIn this section—\ndeclared ship means a ship declared under a regulation to be a ship to which this section applies.\noperate , a declared ship, includes anchor, berth or moor the declared ship.\ns 49 sub 2002 No. 15 s 36\namd 2010 No. 19 s 229 ; 2016 No. 3 s 71\n(sec.49-ssec.1) The owner or master of a declared ship must not operate the declared ship in nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage from a declared ship, unless— the declared ship is fitted with a sewage holding device; and each fixed toilet on the declared ship is connected to a sewage holding device. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.49-ssec.2) A declared ship is taken not to be fitted with a sewage holding device unless a sewage holding device fitted to the ship is appropriate having regard to— the maximum number of persons the ship is permitted to carry under— for a domestic commercial vessel—the domestic commercial vessel national law; or for a Queensland regulated ship—the Marine Safety Act ; and the duration of the ship’s journey in the nil discharge waters.\n(sec.49-ssec.3) The nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage from a declared ship are the coastal waters prescribed under a regulation for this section.\n(sec.49-ssec.4) In this section— declared ship means a ship declared under a regulation to be a ship to which this section applies. operate , a declared ship, includes anchor, berth or moor the declared ship.\n- (a) the declared ship is fitted with a sewage holding device; and\n- (b) each fixed toilet on the declared ship is connected to a sewage holding device.\n- (a) the maximum number of persons the ship is permitted to carry under— (i) for a domestic commercial vessel—the domestic commercial vessel national law; or (ii) for a Queensland regulated ship—the Marine Safety Act ; and\n- (i) for a domestic commercial vessel—the domestic commercial vessel national law; or\n- (ii) for a Queensland regulated ship—the Marine Safety Act ; and\n- (b) the duration of the ship’s journey in the nil discharge waters.\n- (i) for a domestic commercial vessel—the domestic commercial vessel national law; or\n- (ii) for a Queensland regulated ship—the Marine Safety Act ; and","sortOrder":85},{"sectionNumber":"sec.50","sectionType":"section","heading":"Discharge of sewage from declared ship into nil discharge waters for sewage prohibited","content":"### sec.50 Discharge of sewage from declared ship into nil discharge waters for sewage prohibited\n\nIf treated sewage or untreated sewage is discharged from a declared ship into the nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage from a declared ship under section 49 , each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nThis section applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\ns 50 prev s 50 om 2002 No. 15 s 35\npres s 50 ins 2002 No. 15 s 36\n(sec.50-ssec.1) If treated sewage or untreated sewage is discharged from a declared ship into the nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage from a declared ship under section 49 , each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.50-ssec.2) This section applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .","sortOrder":86},{"sectionNumber":"sec.50A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Discharge of sewage by prescribed ships","content":"### sec.50A Discharge of sewage by prescribed ships\n\nThe owner or master of a prescribed ship must not operate the ship unless the ship has 1 of the following sewage systems—\na sewage treatment system;\na sewage comminuting and disinfecting system for the temporary storage of sewage when the ship is less than 3n miles from the nearest land;\na holding tank—\nwith capacity to retain all sewage, having regard to the ship’s operation, the number of persons on board and other relevant factors; and\nconstructed to have a means to indicate visually the amount of its contents.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nIf untreated sewage is discharged from a prescribed ship into coastal waters, each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nIf treated sewage is discharged from a prescribed ship into prohibited discharge waters, each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nIf treated sewage is discharged from a prescribed ship into coastal waters, each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence, unless each of the following applies—\nthe ship is operating a sewage treatment plant approved by the IMO;\nInformation on sewage treatment plants is available from MSQ, the Australian Maritime Safety Authority or the IMO’s website for the Global Integrated Shipping Information System at http://gisis.imo.org/Public.\nthe test results of the treatment system are stated in the ship’s International Sewage Pollution Prevention Certificate;\nthe effluent does not produce visible floating solids or discolour the surrounding water.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nSubsections (2) , (3) and (4) apply despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\nIn this section—\nprescribed ship means a ship engaged in an international voyage—\nwith a gross tonnage of at least 400; or\nwith a gross tonnage of less than 400 and certified to carry more than 15 persons.\nSee Annex IV to MARPOL , chapter 1 , regulation 2.\ns 50A ins 2008 No. 67 s 243\namd 2010 No. 13 s 90\n(sec.50A-ssec.1) The owner or master of a prescribed ship must not operate the ship unless the ship has 1 of the following sewage systems— a sewage treatment system; a sewage comminuting and disinfecting system for the temporary storage of sewage when the ship is less than 3n miles from the nearest land; a holding tank— with capacity to retain all sewage, having regard to the ship’s operation, the number of persons on board and other relevant factors; and constructed to have a means to indicate visually the amount of its contents. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.50A-ssec.2) If untreated sewage is discharged from a prescribed ship into coastal waters, each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.50A-ssec.3) If treated sewage is discharged from a prescribed ship into prohibited discharge waters, each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.50A-ssec.4) If treated sewage is discharged from a prescribed ship into coastal waters, each culpable person for the discharge commits an offence, unless each of the following applies— the ship is operating a sewage treatment plant approved by the IMO; Information on sewage treatment plants is available from MSQ, the Australian Maritime Safety Authority or the IMO’s website for the Global Integrated Shipping Information System at http://gisis.imo.org/Public. the test results of the treatment system are stated in the ship’s International Sewage Pollution Prevention Certificate; the effluent does not produce visible floating solids or discolour the surrounding water. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.50A-ssec.5) Subsections (2) , (3) and (4) apply despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\n(sec.50A-ssec.6) In this section— prescribed ship means a ship engaged in an international voyage— with a gross tonnage of at least 400; or with a gross tonnage of less than 400 and certified to carry more than 15 persons. See Annex IV to MARPOL , chapter 1 , regulation 2.\n- (a) a sewage treatment system;\n- (b) a sewage comminuting and disinfecting system for the temporary storage of sewage when the ship is less than 3n miles from the nearest land;\n- (c) a holding tank— (i) with capacity to retain all sewage, having regard to the ship’s operation, the number of persons on board and other relevant factors; and (ii) constructed to have a means to indicate visually the amount of its contents.\n- (i) with capacity to retain all sewage, having regard to the ship’s operation, the number of persons on board and other relevant factors; and\n- (ii) constructed to have a means to indicate visually the amount of its contents.\n- (i) with capacity to retain all sewage, having regard to the ship’s operation, the number of persons on board and other relevant factors; and\n- (ii) constructed to have a means to indicate visually the amount of its contents.\n- (a) the ship is operating a sewage treatment plant approved by the IMO; Note— Information on sewage treatment plants is available from MSQ, the Australian Maritime Safety Authority or the IMO’s website for the Global Integrated Shipping Information System at http://gisis.imo.org/Public.\n- (b) the test results of the treatment system are stated in the ship’s International Sewage Pollution Prevention Certificate;\n- (c) the effluent does not produce visible floating solids or discolour the surrounding water.\n- (a) with a gross tonnage of at least 400; or\n- (b) with a gross tonnage of less than 400 and certified to carry more than 15 persons.","sortOrder":87},{"sectionNumber":"sec.51","sectionType":"section","heading":"Shipboard sewage management plan","content":"### sec.51 Shipboard sewage management plan\n\nThis section applies to a ship declared under a regulation for this section.\nIf a ship does not have on board a shipboard sewage management plan, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nIf a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\nIf a ship has on board a shipboard sewage management plan but is not fitted with any equipment that may be required to implement the plan, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nIf a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\nA regulation may prescribe minimum requirements for a shipboard sewage management plan.\ns 51 sub 2002 No. 15 s 36\namd 2013 No. 51 s 229 sch 1\n(sec.51-ssec.1) This section applies to a ship declared under a regulation for this section.\n(sec.51-ssec.2) If a ship does not have on board a shipboard sewage management plan, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units. If a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\n(sec.51-ssec.3) If a ship has on board a shipboard sewage management plan but is not fitted with any equipment that may be required to implement the plan, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units. If a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\n(sec.51-ssec.4) A regulation may prescribe minimum requirements for a shipboard sewage management plan.","sortOrder":88},{"sectionNumber":"pt.7-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Defence","content":"## Defence","sortOrder":89},{"sectionNumber":"sec.51A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defence to discharge offence","content":"### sec.51A Defence to discharge offence\n\nEach of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence—\nthe discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea;\nthe discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge.\nFor subsection (1) (b) , damage to a ship or its equipment is intentional damage only if the damage arose in circumstances in which the ship’s owner, master or another member of the ship’s crew—\nacted with intent to cause damage; or\nacted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.\ns 51A ins 2002 No. 15 s 36\n(sec.51A-ssec.1) Each of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence— the discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea; the discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge.\n(sec.51A-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (b) , damage to a ship or its equipment is intentional damage only if the damage arose in circumstances in which the ship’s owner, master or another member of the ship’s crew— acted with intent to cause damage; or acted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.\n- (a) the discharge was necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea;\n- (b) the discharge resulted from damage, other than intentional damage, to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken after the damage happened or the discharge was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge.\n- (a) acted with intent to cause damage; or\n- (b) acted recklessly and with knowledge that damage would probably result.","sortOrder":90},{"sectionNumber":"pt.7-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"General","content":"## General","sortOrder":91},{"sectionNumber":"sec.51B","sectionType":"section","heading":"Treatment system to be in proper working order","content":"### sec.51B Treatment system to be in proper working order\n\nThis section applies if—\na ship is operating in coastal waters that are outside the nil discharge waters for treated sewage under section 48 but within the nil discharge waters for untreated sewage under section 47 ; and\nthe ship is fitted with a treatment system.\nThe owner or master of the ship or a member of the ship’s crew responsible for the operation of the treatment system must ensure that the treatment system is not operated, or available to be operated, to discharge the sewage into the coastal waters unless the system is in proper working order.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\nIn a proceeding for an offence against subsection (2) , the fact that at a particular time an indicator on a treatment system was indicating that the system was malfunctioning is evidence that the system was not in proper working order at the time.\nIn this section—\nmalfunctioning includes the following—\nfaulty;\nin need of attention;\nnot in proper working order;\nout of order.\ns 51B ins 2002 No. 15 s 36\n(sec.51B-ssec.1) This section applies if— a ship is operating in coastal waters that are outside the nil discharge waters for treated sewage under section 48 but within the nil discharge waters for untreated sewage under section 47 ; and the ship is fitted with a treatment system.\n(sec.51B-ssec.2) The owner or master of the ship or a member of the ship’s crew responsible for the operation of the treatment system must ensure that the treatment system is not operated, or available to be operated, to discharge the sewage into the coastal waters unless the system is in proper working order. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n(sec.51B-ssec.3) In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (2) , the fact that at a particular time an indicator on a treatment system was indicating that the system was malfunctioning is evidence that the system was not in proper working order at the time.\n(sec.51B-ssec.4) In this section— malfunctioning includes the following— faulty; in need of attention; not in proper working order; out of order.\n- (a) a ship is operating in coastal waters that are outside the nil discharge waters for treated sewage under section 48 but within the nil discharge waters for untreated sewage under section 47 ; and\n- (b) the ship is fitted with a treatment system.\n- (a) faulty;\n- (b) in need of attention;\n- (c) not in proper working order;\n- (d) out of order.","sortOrder":92},{"sectionNumber":"sec.51C","sectionType":"section","heading":"Other laws may also apply","content":"### sec.51C Other laws may also apply\n\nThis part does not limit another law imposing more stringent requirements about the discharge of sewage into coastal waters.\nTransport Infrastructure (Sunshine Coast Waterways) Management Plan 2000\ns 51C ins 2002 No. 15 s 36","sortOrder":93},{"sectionNumber":"pt.7-div.5","sectionType":"division","heading":null,"content":"","sortOrder":94},{"sectionNumber":"pt.8","sectionType":"part","heading":"Prevention of pollution by garbage","content":"# Prevention of pollution by garbage","sortOrder":95},{"sectionNumber":"pt.8-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Purpose","content":"## Purpose","sortOrder":96},{"sectionNumber":"sec.52","sectionType":"section","heading":"Part gives effect to Annex V to MARPOL","content":"### sec.52 Part gives effect to Annex V to MARPOL\n\nThe purpose of this part is to give effect to relevant provisions of Annex V to MARPOL.","sortOrder":97},{"sectionNumber":"pt.8-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Interpretation","content":"## Interpretation","sortOrder":98},{"sectionNumber":"sec.53","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for part","content":"### sec.53 Definitions for part\n\nIn this part—\ndischarge offence means an offence against section 55 (1) .\ngarbage includes plastics.","sortOrder":99},{"sectionNumber":"sec.54","sectionType":"section","heading":"Words and expressions used in Annex V to MARPOL and this part","content":"### sec.54 Words and expressions used in Annex V to MARPOL and this part\n\nWords and expressions used in Annex V to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\nSubsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex V.\nExcept as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex V to MARPOL and this part—\nthis part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex V; and\nthe definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex V definition is displaced.\n(sec.54-ssec.1) Words and expressions used in Annex V to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\n(sec.54-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex V.\n(sec.54-ssec.3) Except as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex V to MARPOL and this part— this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex V; and the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex V definition is displaced.\n- (a) this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex V; and\n- (b) the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex V definition is displaced.","sortOrder":100},{"sectionNumber":"pt.8-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Disposal of garbage prohibited","content":"## Disposal of garbage prohibited","sortOrder":101},{"sectionNumber":"sec.55","sectionType":"section","heading":"Disposal of garbage into coastal waters prohibited","content":"### sec.55 Disposal of garbage into coastal waters prohibited\n\nIf garbage is disposed of from a ship into coastal waters, the following persons each commit an offence—\nthe ship’s owner;\nthe ship’s master;\nanother member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the disposal, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.\nMaximum penalty—3,500 penalty units.\nSubsection (1) applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\nSee the note to section 26 (2) for information about sections 23 and 24 of the Code .\ns 55 amd 2001 No. 79 s 53 ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.55-ssec.1) If garbage is disposed of from a ship into coastal waters, the following persons each commit an offence— the ship’s owner; the ship’s master; another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the disposal, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction. Maximum penalty—3,500 penalty units.\n(sec.55-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 . See the note to section 26 (2) for information about sections 23 and 24 of the Code .\n- (a) the ship’s owner;\n- (b) the ship’s master;\n- (c) another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused or contributed to the disposal, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.","sortOrder":102},{"sectionNumber":"sec.55AA","sectionType":"section","heading":"Placard about garbage disposal requirements","content":"### sec.55AA Placard about garbage disposal requirements\n\nIf a ship that is at least 12m in length overall does not display a placard complying with subsection (2) , the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence.\nMaximum penalty—20 penalty units.\nThe placard must—\nnotify the ship’s crew and passengers of the prohibitions and requirements under this Act for the disposal of garbage; and\nbe written in English and, if the ship is owned or operated by a foreign country, the working language of the ship’s crew.\ns 55AA ins 2008 No. 67 s 244\namd 2010 No. 13 s 91\n(sec.55AA-ssec.1) If a ship that is at least 12m in length overall does not display a placard complying with subsection (2) , the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence. Maximum penalty—20 penalty units.\n(sec.55AA-ssec.2) The placard must— notify the ship’s crew and passengers of the prohibitions and requirements under this Act for the disposal of garbage; and be written in English and, if the ship is owned or operated by a foreign country, the working language of the ship’s crew.\n- (a) notify the ship’s crew and passengers of the prohibitions and requirements under this Act for the disposal of garbage; and\n- (b) be written in English and, if the ship is owned or operated by a foreign country, the working language of the ship’s crew.","sortOrder":103},{"sectionNumber":"sec.55A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Shipboard waste management plan","content":"### sec.55A Shipboard waste management plan\n\nThis section applies to a ship—\nat least 35m in length overall; or\ndesigned to sleep at least 15 persons.\nIf the ship does not have on board a shipboard waste management plan, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nIf a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\nIf the ship is not fitted with any equipment that may be required to implement the plan, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nA regulation may prescribe minimum requirements for a shipboard waste management plan.\ns 55A ins 2000 No. 6 s 41\namd 2005 No. 49 s 36 ; 2013 No. 51 s 229 sch 1\n(sec.55A-ssec.1) This section applies to a ship— at least 35m in length overall; or designed to sleep at least 15 persons.\n(sec.55A-ssec.2) If the ship does not have on board a shipboard waste management plan, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units. If a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\n(sec.55A-ssec.3) If the ship is not fitted with any equipment that may be required to implement the plan, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.55A-ssec.4) A regulation may prescribe minimum requirements for a shipboard waste management plan.\n- (a) at least 35m in length overall; or\n- (b) designed to sleep at least 15 persons.","sortOrder":104},{"sectionNumber":"pt.8-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Defences","content":"## Defences","sortOrder":105},{"sectionNumber":"sec.56","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defences to discharge offence","content":"### sec.56 Defences to discharge offence\n\nEach of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence—\nthe disposal was made for the purpose of securing the safety of the ship and the persons on board the ship or saving life at sea;\nthe disposal happened because of damage to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken before and after the damage happened to prevent or minimise the disposal;\nthe disposal was the accidental loss at sea of a synthetic fishing net, or synthetic material used in the repair of a synthetic fishing net, and all reasonable precautions were taken to prevent the loss.\ns 56 amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n- (a) the disposal was made for the purpose of securing the safety of the ship and the persons on board the ship or saving life at sea;\n- (b) the disposal happened because of damage to the ship or its equipment and all reasonable precautions were taken before and after the damage happened to prevent or minimise the disposal;\n- (c) the disposal was the accidental loss at sea of a synthetic fishing net, or synthetic material used in the repair of a synthetic fishing net, and all reasonable precautions were taken to prevent the loss.","sortOrder":106},{"sectionNumber":"pt.8-div.5","sectionType":"division","heading":"Exemptions","content":"## Exemptions","sortOrder":107},{"sectionNumber":"sec.57","sectionType":"section","heading":"Certain disposals permissible","content":"### sec.57 Certain disposals permissible\n\nThe regulations may exempt disposals from the operation of the discharge offence.\nHowever, a regulation may be made only if it gives effect to an exemption allowed under MARPOL or relates to fishing or tourism operations.\n(sec.57-ssec.1) The regulations may exempt disposals from the operation of the discharge offence.\n(sec.57-ssec.2) However, a regulation may be made only if it gives effect to an exemption allowed under MARPOL or relates to fishing or tourism operations.","sortOrder":108},{"sectionNumber":"pt.9","sectionType":"part","heading":"Transfer operations","content":"# Transfer operations","sortOrder":109},{"sectionNumber":"pt.9-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Purpose of part","content":"## Purpose of part","sortOrder":110},{"sectionNumber":"sec.58","sectionType":"section","heading":"Responsibility for pollution from transfer operations and other matters","content":"### sec.58 Responsibility for pollution from transfer operations and other matters\n\nThe purpose of this part is—\nto state when a ship’s owner, master or other crew member is responsible for a discharge happening during or because of a transfer operation; and\nto make provision for other matters about transfer operations.\ns 58 amd 2001 No. 79 s 54\n- (a) to state when a ship’s owner, master or other crew member is responsible for a discharge happening during or because of a transfer operation; and\n- (b) to make provision for other matters about transfer operations.","sortOrder":111},{"sectionNumber":"pt.9-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Interpretation","content":"## Interpretation","sortOrder":112},{"sectionNumber":"sec.59","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for part","content":"### sec.59 Definitions for part\n\nIn this part—\ndischarge offence means an offence against section 61 (1) .\nnoxious liquid substance has the meaning it has in part 5 .\ns 59 def noxious liquid substance amd 2007 No. 43 s 12\noil has the meaning it has in part 4 .\ntransfer apparatus , for a ship, means apparatus used in the transfer of a pollutant between a ship and another ship or place.\ntransfer operation , for a ship, means any operation involved in preparing for, or starting, carrying on or finishing, a transfer of a pollutant between a ship and another ship or place.","sortOrder":113},{"sectionNumber":"sec.60","sectionType":"section","heading":"Words and expressions used in Annex I or II to MARPOL and this part","content":"### sec.60 Words and expressions used in Annex I or II to MARPOL and this part\n\nWords and expressions used in Annex I or II to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\nSubsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex I or II.\nExcept as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex I or II to MARPOL and this part—\nthis part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex I or II; and\nthe definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex I or II definition is displaced.\n(sec.60-ssec.1) Words and expressions used in Annex I or II to MARPOL and this part have the same meanings in this part they have in the annex.\n(sec.60-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not a particular word or expression is defined in Annex I or II.\n(sec.60-ssec.3) Except as far as the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, if a word or expression is defined in Annex I or II to MARPOL and this part— this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex I or II; and the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex I or II definition is displaced.\n- (a) this part’s definition does not limit or exclude, but may extend, the meaning of the word or expression given under Annex I or II; and\n- (b) the definitions are to be read in the context of each other and the other provisions of this Act, but, if the definitions so read are inconsistent, the Annex I or II definition is displaced.","sortOrder":114},{"sectionNumber":"pt.9-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Discharge during transfer operation prohibited","content":"## Discharge during transfer operation prohibited","sortOrder":115},{"sectionNumber":"sec.60A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Obligation to monitor transfer operation","content":"### sec.60A Obligation to monitor transfer operation\n\nThe ship’s owner and the ship’s master must ensure that a transfer operation is monitored by a member of the ship’s crew.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\ns 60A ins 2005 No. 49 s 37","sortOrder":116},{"sectionNumber":"sec.61","sectionType":"section","heading":"Discharge of pollutant into coastal waters prohibited","content":"### sec.61 Discharge of pollutant into coastal waters prohibited\n\nIf a pollutant is discharged into coastal waters during a transfer operation, the following persons each commit an offence—\nthe ship’s owner;\nthe ship’s master;\nanother member of the ship’s crew whose act caused the discharge, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.\nMaximum penalty—3,500 penalty units.\nSubsection (1) applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 .\nSee the note to section 26 (2) for information about sections 23 and 24 of the Code .\ns 61 amd 2001 No. 79 s 55 ; 2006 No. 21 s 10 ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.61-ssec.1) If a pollutant is discharged into coastal waters during a transfer operation, the following persons each commit an offence— the ship’s owner; the ship’s master; another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused the discharge, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction. Maximum penalty—3,500 penalty units.\n(sec.61-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies despite the Criminal Code , sections 23 and 24 . See the note to section 26 (2) for information about sections 23 and 24 of the Code .\n- (a) the ship’s owner;\n- (b) the ship’s master;\n- (c) another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused the discharge, unless the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.","sortOrder":117},{"sectionNumber":"pt.9-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Defences","content":"## Defences","sortOrder":118},{"sectionNumber":"sec.62","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defences to discharge offence","content":"### sec.62 Defences to discharge offence\n\nEach of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence—\nthe discharge happened because of operator error by someone not under the master’s direction and the master took all reasonable precautions after the discharge happened or was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge;\nthe discharge happened because of a fault in transfer apparatus not operated at the master’s direction and—\nif the person charged with committing the offence is the ship’s owner or master—\nbefore the transfer operation, the owner or master did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault and the master took all reasonable steps to find out whether the transfer apparatus was in good working order; and\nafter the discharge happened or was discovered, the master took all reasonable precautions to prevent or minimise the discharge; or\nif the person charged with committing the offence is another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused the discharge—the person did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault;\nthe discharge happened because of a fault in transfer apparatus brought onto the ship and operated at the master’s direction if—\nthe master took all reasonable steps to ensure that the apparatus was in good working order immediately before the transfer operation started; and\nthe master took all reasonable precautions after the discharge happened or was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge;\na defence available under another part of this Act for a discharge of the relevant pollutant.\nFor subsection (1) (b) (i) (A) , the master must prove that the master took all reasonable steps to find out from all members of the ship’s crew any information concerning any fault in the transfer apparatus known to them.\nIn this section—\nfault , in transfer apparatus, does not include any existing defect in the transfer apparatus resulting from an event, lack of maintenance or anything else that happened while the transfer apparatus was under the direction of the master of the ship.\ns 62 amd 2006 No. 21 s 11\n(sec.62-ssec.1) Each of the following is a defence to a prosecution for a discharge offence— the discharge happened because of operator error by someone not under the master’s direction and the master took all reasonable precautions after the discharge happened or was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge; the discharge happened because of a fault in transfer apparatus not operated at the master’s direction and— if the person charged with committing the offence is the ship’s owner or master— before the transfer operation, the owner or master did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault and the master took all reasonable steps to find out whether the transfer apparatus was in good working order; and after the discharge happened or was discovered, the master took all reasonable precautions to prevent or minimise the discharge; or if the person charged with committing the offence is another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused the discharge—the person did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault; the discharge happened because of a fault in transfer apparatus brought onto the ship and operated at the master’s direction if— the master took all reasonable steps to ensure that the apparatus was in good working order immediately before the transfer operation started; and the master took all reasonable precautions after the discharge happened or was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge; a defence available under another part of this Act for a discharge of the relevant pollutant.\n(sec.62-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (b) (i) (A) , the master must prove that the master took all reasonable steps to find out from all members of the ship’s crew any information concerning any fault in the transfer apparatus known to them.\n(sec.62-ssec.3) In this section— fault , in transfer apparatus, does not include any existing defect in the transfer apparatus resulting from an event, lack of maintenance or anything else that happened while the transfer apparatus was under the direction of the master of the ship.\n- (a) the discharge happened because of operator error by someone not under the master’s direction and the master took all reasonable precautions after the discharge happened or was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge;\n- (b) the discharge happened because of a fault in transfer apparatus not operated at the master’s direction and— (i) if the person charged with committing the offence is the ship’s owner or master— (A) before the transfer operation, the owner or master did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault and the master took all reasonable steps to find out whether the transfer apparatus was in good working order; and (B) after the discharge happened or was discovered, the master took all reasonable precautions to prevent or minimise the discharge; or (ii) if the person charged with committing the offence is another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused the discharge—the person did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault;\n- (i) if the person charged with committing the offence is the ship’s owner or master— (A) before the transfer operation, the owner or master did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault and the master took all reasonable steps to find out whether the transfer apparatus was in good working order; and (B) after the discharge happened or was discovered, the master took all reasonable precautions to prevent or minimise the discharge; or\n- (A) before the transfer operation, the owner or master did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault and the master took all reasonable steps to find out whether the transfer apparatus was in good working order; and\n- (B) after the discharge happened or was discovered, the master took all reasonable precautions to prevent or minimise the discharge; or\n- (ii) if the person charged with committing the offence is another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused the discharge—the person did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault;\n- (c) the discharge happened because of a fault in transfer apparatus brought onto the ship and operated at the master’s direction if— (i) the master took all reasonable steps to ensure that the apparatus was in good working order immediately before the transfer operation started; and (ii) the master took all reasonable precautions after the discharge happened or was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge;\n- (i) the master took all reasonable steps to ensure that the apparatus was in good working order immediately before the transfer operation started; and\n- (ii) the master took all reasonable precautions after the discharge happened or was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge;\n- (d) a defence available under another part of this Act for a discharge of the relevant pollutant.\n- (i) if the person charged with committing the offence is the ship’s owner or master— (A) before the transfer operation, the owner or master did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault and the master took all reasonable steps to find out whether the transfer apparatus was in good working order; and (B) after the discharge happened or was discovered, the master took all reasonable precautions to prevent or minimise the discharge; or\n- (A) before the transfer operation, the owner or master did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault and the master took all reasonable steps to find out whether the transfer apparatus was in good working order; and\n- (B) after the discharge happened or was discovered, the master took all reasonable precautions to prevent or minimise the discharge; or\n- (ii) if the person charged with committing the offence is another member of the ship’s crew whose act caused the discharge—the person did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault;\n- (A) before the transfer operation, the owner or master did not know, or could not reasonably have known, about the existence of the fault and the master took all reasonable steps to find out whether the transfer apparatus was in good working order; and\n- (B) after the discharge happened or was discovered, the master took all reasonable precautions to prevent or minimise the discharge; or\n- (i) the master took all reasonable steps to ensure that the apparatus was in good working order immediately before the transfer operation started; and\n- (ii) the master took all reasonable precautions after the discharge happened or was discovered to prevent or minimise the discharge;","sortOrder":119},{"sectionNumber":"pt.9-div.5","sectionType":"division","heading":"General","content":"## General","sortOrder":120},{"sectionNumber":"sec.63","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.63\n\ns 63 amd 2006 No. 21 s 12\nom 2019 No. 25 s 22","sortOrder":121},{"sectionNumber":"sec.64","sectionType":"section","heading":"Several liability—ships","content":"### sec.64 Several liability—ships\n\nThis section applies to a transfer operation involving oil or noxious liquid substances in bulk.\nIf—\na discharge happens from 2 or more ships; and\nit is not reasonably practicable to identify the oil or noxious liquid substance that has discharged from a particular ship;\nall of the oil or noxious liquid substance discharged is taken, for this part and sections 113 , 115 , 122 and 127 , to have been discharged from each of the ships.\n(sec.64-ssec.1) This section applies to a transfer operation involving oil or noxious liquid substances in bulk.\n(sec.64-ssec.2) If— a discharge happens from 2 or more ships; and it is not reasonably practicable to identify the oil or noxious liquid substance that has discharged from a particular ship; all of the oil or noxious liquid substance discharged is taken, for this part and sections 113 , 115 , 122 and 127 , to have been discharged from each of the ships.\n- (a) a discharge happens from 2 or more ships; and\n- (b) it is not reasonably practicable to identify the oil or noxious liquid substance that has discharged from a particular ship;","sortOrder":122},{"sectionNumber":"sec.65","sectionType":"section","heading":"Keeping of records about transfer etc.","content":"### sec.65 Keeping of records about transfer etc.\n\nThis section applies to—\na ship’s owner; and\na ship’s master; and\nthe occupier of a place to or from which a pollutant is transferred.\nA person to whom this section applies must keep the records the person is required to keep by regulation.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\nIf a happening required under the regulations to be recorded by a person happens, the person must record, without delay, the happening in the way prescribed under the regulations.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n(sec.65-ssec.1) This section applies to— a ship’s owner; and a ship’s master; and the occupier of a place to or from which a pollutant is transferred.\n(sec.65-ssec.2) A person to whom this section applies must keep the records the person is required to keep by regulation. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n(sec.65-ssec.3) If a happening required under the regulations to be recorded by a person happens, the person must record, without delay, the happening in the way prescribed under the regulations. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n- (a) a ship’s owner; and\n- (b) a ship’s master; and\n- (c) the occupier of a place to or from which a pollutant is transferred.","sortOrder":123},{"sectionNumber":"pt.10","sectionType":"part","heading":"Reception facilities","content":"# Reception facilities","sortOrder":124},{"sectionNumber":"sec.66","sectionType":"section","heading":"Reception facilities","content":"### sec.66 Reception facilities\n\nThis section applies to the provision of reception facilities—\nunder regulation 38 of Annex I, regulation 18 of Annex II and regulation 7 of Annex V to MARPOL; or\nunder part 7 .\nThe general manager may provide, join with someone else in providing, arrange for the provision of, or direct the providing of the reception facilities.\nWithout limiting subsection (2) , the Gold Coast Waterways Authority may also provide, join with someone else in providing, arrange for the provision of, or direct the providing of the reception facilities for Gold Coast waters.\nThe general manager or the Gold Coast Waterways Authority may give a notice under subsection (5) to—\nthe owner or occupier or a port operator of a port or terminal; or\nthe owner or occupier or a port operator of an establishment at which ships—\nare repaired or other work is performed on ships if the repair or work involves the disposal of oily mixtures, mixtures containing noxious liquid substances, oil residues, residues of noxious liquid substances or sewage; or\nare berthed, docked or otherwise at the establishment.\nA notice may direct an owner or occupier or a port operator of a port, terminal or establishment to—\nprovide facilities for the reception or disposal of residues by ships berthed, docked or otherwise at the port, terminal or establishment; and\nmaintain the facilities in good order and condition; and\nmake the facilities available to enable ships to dispose of the residues.\nA notice—\nmay state a time within which a direction is to be complied with; and\nmust be signed by the general manager or on behalf of the Gold Coast Waterways Authority.\nAn owner or occupier or a port operator must comply with a notice.\nMaximum penalty—\nfor the first offence—1,750 penalty units; and\nif the contravention continues after conviction—1,750 penalty units and an additional penalty of 20 penalty units for each day after the last conviction that the contravention continues.\nAn owner’s or occupier’s or a port operator’s obligation to comply with a notice continues until the direction given by the notice is complied with even though, in a particular case, the notice specifies a time by which compliance is required and the time has passed.\nA charge against an owner or occupier or a port operator for a contravention of subsection (7) continuing after conviction may state the date of the last conviction and the day or period during which the contravention continued.\nCharges under subsection (9) for a particular continuing contravention may be prosecuted from time to time.\nIn this section—\nresidues include oil, noxious liquid substances, sewage and garbage.\nterminal includes an oil depot, oil installation or other place used for the loading or unloading in bulk of oil or noxious liquid substances.\ns 66 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2007 No. 43 s 13 ; 2010 No. 19 s 134 ; 2012 No. 38 s 117\n(sec.66-ssec.1) This section applies to the provision of reception facilities— under regulation 38 of Annex I, regulation 18 of Annex II and regulation 7 of Annex V to MARPOL; or under part 7 .\n(sec.66-ssec.2) The general manager may provide, join with someone else in providing, arrange for the provision of, or direct the providing of the reception facilities.\n(sec.66-ssec.3) Without limiting subsection (2) , the Gold Coast Waterways Authority may also provide, join with someone else in providing, arrange for the provision of, or direct the providing of the reception facilities for Gold Coast waters.\n(sec.66-ssec.4) The general manager or the Gold Coast Waterways Authority may give a notice under subsection (5) to— the owner or occupier or a port operator of a port or terminal; or the owner or occupier or a port operator of an establishment at which ships— are repaired or other work is performed on ships if the repair or work involves the disposal of oily mixtures, mixtures containing noxious liquid substances, oil residues, residues of noxious liquid substances or sewage; or are berthed, docked or otherwise at the establishment.\n(sec.66-ssec.5) A notice may direct an owner or occupier or a port operator of a port, terminal or establishment to— provide facilities for the reception or disposal of residues by ships berthed, docked or otherwise at the port, terminal or establishment; and maintain the facilities in good order and condition; and make the facilities available to enable ships to dispose of the residues.\n(sec.66-ssec.6) A notice— may state a time within which a direction is to be complied with; and must be signed by the general manager or on behalf of the Gold Coast Waterways Authority.\n(sec.66-ssec.7) An owner or occupier or a port operator must comply with a notice. Maximum penalty— for the first offence—1,750 penalty units; and if the contravention continues after conviction—1,750 penalty units and an additional penalty of 20 penalty units for each day after the last conviction that the contravention continues.\n(sec.66-ssec.8) An owner’s or occupier’s or a port operator’s obligation to comply with a notice continues until the direction given by the notice is complied with even though, in a particular case, the notice specifies a time by which compliance is required and the time has passed.\n(sec.66-ssec.9) A charge against an owner or occupier or a port operator for a contravention of subsection (7) continuing after conviction may state the date of the last conviction and the day or period during which the contravention continued.\n(sec.66-ssec.10) Charges under subsection (9) for a particular continuing contravention may be prosecuted from time to time.\n(sec.66-ssec.11) In this section— residues include oil, noxious liquid substances, sewage and garbage. terminal includes an oil depot, oil installation or other place used for the loading or unloading in bulk of oil or noxious liquid substances.\n- (a) under regulation 38 of Annex I, regulation 18 of Annex II and regulation 7 of Annex V to MARPOL; or\n- (b) under part 7 .\n- (a) the owner or occupier or a port operator of a port or terminal; or\n- (b) the owner or occupier or a port operator of an establishment at which ships— (i) are repaired or other work is performed on ships if the repair or work involves the disposal of oily mixtures, mixtures containing noxious liquid substances, oil residues, residues of noxious liquid substances or sewage; or (ii) are berthed, docked or otherwise at the establishment.\n- (i) are repaired or other work is performed on ships if the repair or work involves the disposal of oily mixtures, mixtures containing noxious liquid substances, oil residues, residues of noxious liquid substances or sewage; or\n- (ii) are berthed, docked or otherwise at the establishment.\n- (i) are repaired or other work is performed on ships if the repair or work involves the disposal of oily mixtures, mixtures containing noxious liquid substances, oil residues, residues of noxious liquid substances or sewage; or\n- (ii) are berthed, docked or otherwise at the establishment.\n- (a) provide facilities for the reception or disposal of residues by ships berthed, docked or otherwise at the port, terminal or establishment; and\n- (b) maintain the facilities in good order and condition; and\n- (c) make the facilities available to enable ships to dispose of the residues.\n- (a) may state a time within which a direction is to be complied with; and\n- (b) must be signed by the general manager or on behalf of the Gold Coast Waterways Authority.\n- (a) for the first offence—1,750 penalty units; and\n- (b) if the contravention continues after conviction—1,750 penalty units and an additional penalty of 20 penalty units for each day after the last conviction that the contravention continues.","sortOrder":125},{"sectionNumber":"pt.11","sectionType":"part","heading":"Reporting requirements","content":"# Reporting requirements","sortOrder":126},{"sectionNumber":"sec.67","sectionType":"section","heading":"Duty to report certain incidents","content":"### sec.67 Duty to report certain incidents\n\nIn this section—\ndischarge offence has the meaning it has in parts 4 to 9 .\nharmful substance has the meaning it has in part 6 .\nnoxious liquid substance has the meaning it has in part 5 .\noil has the meaning it has in part 4 .\nreportable incident means—\na discharge or probable discharge of—\noil or a noxious liquid substance that happens in coastal waters; or\nuntreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for untreated sewage under section 47 ; or\ntreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for treated sewage under section 48 ; or\nfor a declared ship, treated sewage or untreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage under section 49 ; or\nthe jettisoning of a harmful substance carried in packaged form from a ship that happens in coastal waters;\nbut does not include a discharge or jettisoning exempted by regulation.\nA ship’s master must notify, without delay, an authorised officer of a reportable incident in the way prescribed by regulation.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nIf the ship’s master cannot comply with subsection (2) , the ship’s owner or the owner’s agent must notify, without delay, an authorised officer of the reportable incident in the way prescribed by regulation, unless the owner or owner’s agent has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nA person mentioned in subsection (2) or (3) who has notified an authorised officer of the reportable incident must give a report to an authorised officer about the incident if asked by an authorised officer.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nThe report must include the particulars, and be given to an authorised officer within the time, prescribed under a regulation.\nA notice given to an authorised officer under subsection (2) or (3) , and a report given to an authorised officer under subsection (4) , must not, without the consent of the person charged, be admitted in evidence in a prosecution for a discharge offence.\ns 67 amd 2001 No. 79 s 56 ; 2002 No. 15 s 37\n(sec.67-ssec.1) In this section— discharge offence has the meaning it has in parts 4 to 9 . harmful substance has the meaning it has in part 6 . noxious liquid substance has the meaning it has in part 5 . oil has the meaning it has in part 4 . reportable incident means— a discharge or probable discharge of— oil or a noxious liquid substance that happens in coastal waters; or untreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for untreated sewage under section 47 ; or treated sewage in the nil discharge waters for treated sewage under section 48 ; or for a declared ship, treated sewage or untreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage under section 49 ; or the jettisoning of a harmful substance carried in packaged form from a ship that happens in coastal waters; but does not include a discharge or jettisoning exempted by regulation.\n(sec.67-ssec.2) A ship’s master must notify, without delay, an authorised officer of a reportable incident in the way prescribed by regulation. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.67-ssec.3) If the ship’s master cannot comply with subsection (2) , the ship’s owner or the owner’s agent must notify, without delay, an authorised officer of the reportable incident in the way prescribed by regulation, unless the owner or owner’s agent has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.67-ssec.4) A person mentioned in subsection (2) or (3) who has notified an authorised officer of the reportable incident must give a report to an authorised officer about the incident if asked by an authorised officer. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units.\n(sec.67-ssec.5) The report must include the particulars, and be given to an authorised officer within the time, prescribed under a regulation.\n(sec.67-ssec.6) A notice given to an authorised officer under subsection (2) or (3) , and a report given to an authorised officer under subsection (4) , must not, without the consent of the person charged, be admitted in evidence in a prosecution for a discharge offence.\n- (a) a discharge or probable discharge of— (i) oil or a noxious liquid substance that happens in coastal waters; or (ii) untreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for untreated sewage under section 47 ; or (iii) treated sewage in the nil discharge waters for treated sewage under section 48 ; or (iv) for a declared ship, treated sewage or untreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage under section 49 ; or\n- (i) oil or a noxious liquid substance that happens in coastal waters; or\n- (ii) untreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for untreated sewage under section 47 ; or\n- (iii) treated sewage in the nil discharge waters for treated sewage under section 48 ; or\n- (iv) for a declared ship, treated sewage or untreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage under section 49 ; or\n- (b) the jettisoning of a harmful substance carried in packaged form from a ship that happens in coastal waters;\n- (i) oil or a noxious liquid substance that happens in coastal waters; or\n- (ii) untreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for untreated sewage under section 47 ; or\n- (iii) treated sewage in the nil discharge waters for treated sewage under section 48 ; or\n- (iv) for a declared ship, treated sewage or untreated sewage in the nil discharge waters for treated sewage or untreated sewage under section 49 ; or","sortOrder":127},{"sectionNumber":"pt.11A","sectionType":"part","heading":"Insurance","content":"# Insurance","sortOrder":128},{"sectionNumber":"sec.67A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Ship’s owner to have insurance","content":"### sec.67A Ship’s owner to have insurance\n\nThis section applies if a ship is more than 15m in length overall.\nThe ship’s owner must have an insurance policy that, to the limits applying under a regulation, is sufficient to pay for—\nthe clean up costs of the discharge of a pollutant from the ship into coastal waters; and\nthe costs of salvage or removal of the ship from coastal waters if the ship is abandoned or wrecked.\nMaximum penalty—850 penalty units.\nIf a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\nThe Minister may recommend the making of a regulation under subsection (4) only if—\nthe Minister has had regard to the risk of the ship discharging pollutants into, or being abandoned or wrecked in, coastal waters; and\nthe Minister is reasonably satisfied that, for the particular type of ship, an insurance policy mentioned in subsection (2) could not reasonably be obtained or kept in force.\nA regulation may exempt a ship from the application of this section.\nA regulation under subsection (4) may provide that, for the exemption to apply, an owner of the ship must comply with conditions stated in the regulation.\nA regulation may provide that an owner develop and implement a risk management plan including matters mentioned in the regulation or that an owner must not operate the ship with more than a stated type or quantity of pollutant on board the ship.\ns 67A ins 2002 No. 15 s 38\namd 2006 No. 21 s 13 ; 2013 No. 51 s 229 sch 1\n(sec.67A-ssec.1) This section applies if a ship is more than 15m in length overall.\n(sec.67A-ssec.2) The ship’s owner must have an insurance policy that, to the limits applying under a regulation, is sufficient to pay for— the clean up costs of the discharge of a pollutant from the ship into coastal waters; and the costs of salvage or removal of the ship from coastal waters if the ship is abandoned or wrecked. Maximum penalty—850 penalty units. If a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\n(sec.67A-ssec.3) The Minister may recommend the making of a regulation under subsection (4) only if— the Minister has had regard to the risk of the ship discharging pollutants into, or being abandoned or wrecked in, coastal waters; and the Minister is reasonably satisfied that, for the particular type of ship, an insurance policy mentioned in subsection (2) could not reasonably be obtained or kept in force.\n(sec.67A-ssec.4) A regulation may exempt a ship from the application of this section.\n(sec.67A-ssec.5) A regulation under subsection (4) may provide that, for the exemption to apply, an owner of the ship must comply with conditions stated in the regulation. A regulation may provide that an owner develop and implement a risk management plan including matters mentioned in the regulation or that an owner must not operate the ship with more than a stated type or quantity of pollutant on board the ship.\n- (a) the clean up costs of the discharge of a pollutant from the ship into coastal waters; and\n- (b) the costs of salvage or removal of the ship from coastal waters if the ship is abandoned or wrecked.\n- (a) the Minister has had regard to the risk of the ship discharging pollutants into, or being abandoned or wrecked in, coastal waters; and\n- (b) the Minister is reasonably satisfied that, for the particular type of ship, an insurance policy mentioned in subsection (2) could not reasonably be obtained or kept in force.","sortOrder":129},{"sectionNumber":"pt.12","sectionType":"part","heading":"Investigation, prevention and minimisation, and enforcement","content":"# Investigation, prevention and minimisation, and enforcement","sortOrder":130},{"sectionNumber":"pt.12-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"General","content":"## General","sortOrder":131},{"sectionNumber":"sec.68","sectionType":"section","heading":"Functions of authorised officers","content":"### sec.68 Functions of authorised officers\n\nAuthorised officers have the following functions—\nto investigate discharges prohibited by this Act;\nto monitor compliance with this Act;\nto monitor transfer operations;\nto examine ships using coastal waters to minimise discharges;\nto take action to remove a pollutant discharged into coastal waters or mitigate its effect on Queensland’s marine and coastal environment.\n- (a) to investigate discharges prohibited by this Act;\n- (b) to monitor compliance with this Act;\n- (c) to monitor transfer operations;\n- (d) to examine ships using coastal waters to minimise discharges;\n- (e) to take action to remove a pollutant discharged into coastal waters or mitigate its effect on Queensland’s marine and coastal environment.","sortOrder":132},{"sectionNumber":"sec.69","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authorised officer subject to directions of general manager","content":"### sec.69 Authorised officer subject to directions of general manager\n\nAn authorised officer is subject to the directions of the general manager in exercising the powers of an authorised officer.\ns 69 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1\nsub 2006 No. 21 s 14","sortOrder":133},{"sectionNumber":"sec.70","sectionType":"section","heading":"Powers of authorised officers","content":"### sec.70 Powers of authorised officers\n\nAn authorised officer has the powers given under this or another Act.\ns 70 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2006 No. 21 s 15","sortOrder":134},{"sectionNumber":"sec.71","sectionType":"section","heading":"Limitation on powers of authorised officer","content":"### sec.71 Limitation on powers of authorised officer\n\nThe powers of an authorised officer may be limited—\nunder the regulations; or\nunder a condition of appointment; or\nby notice of the general manager given to the authorised officer.\nNotice under subsection (1) (c) may be given orally, but must be confirmed in writing as soon as practicable.\ns 71 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2006 No. 21 s 16\n(sec.71-ssec.1) The powers of an authorised officer may be limited— under the regulations; or under a condition of appointment; or by notice of the general manager given to the authorised officer.\n(sec.71-ssec.2) Notice under subsection (1) (c) may be given orally, but must be confirmed in writing as soon as practicable.\n- (a) under the regulations; or\n- (b) under a condition of appointment; or\n- (c) by notice of the general manager given to the authorised officer.","sortOrder":135},{"sectionNumber":"pt.12-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Appointment of authorised officers and other matters","content":"## Appointment of authorised officers and other matters","sortOrder":136},{"sectionNumber":"sec.72","sectionType":"section","heading":"Appointment of authorised officers","content":"### sec.72 Appointment of authorised officers\n\nThe general manager may appoint any of the following persons as authorised officers—\nofficers of the public service;\nemployees of a port authority;\nemployees of MSQ;\nemployees of the Gold Coast Waterways Authority;\nother persons prescribed under the regulations.\nA person may be appointed as an authorised officer only if the general manager considers, on reasonable grounds, that the person has the necessary expertise or experience to be an authorised officer.\ns 72 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2006 No. 21 s 17 ; 2012 No. 38 s 118\n(sec.72-ssec.1) The general manager may appoint any of the following persons as authorised officers— officers of the public service; employees of a port authority; employees of MSQ; employees of the Gold Coast Waterways Authority; other persons prescribed under the regulations.\n(sec.72-ssec.2) A person may be appointed as an authorised officer only if the general manager considers, on reasonable grounds, that the person has the necessary expertise or experience to be an authorised officer.\n- (a) officers of the public service;\n- (b) employees of a port authority;\n- (c) employees of MSQ;\n- (d) employees of the Gold Coast Waterways Authority;\n- (e) other persons prescribed under the regulations.","sortOrder":137},{"sectionNumber":"sec.73","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authorised officer’s appointment conditions","content":"### sec.73 Authorised officer’s appointment conditions\n\nAn authorised officer holds office on the conditions stated in the instrument of appointment.\nAn authorised officer—\nif the appointment provides for a term of appointment—ceases holding office at the end of the term; and\nmay resign by signed notice of resignation given to the general manager; and\nif the conditions of appointment provide—ceases holding office as an authorised officer on ceasing to hold another office stated in the appointment conditions (the main office ).\nHowever, an authorised officer may not resign from the office of authorised officer (the secondary office ) under subsection (2) (b) if a term of the authorised officer’s employment to the main office requires the authorised officer to hold the secondary office.\ns 73 amd 2006 No. 21 s 18\n(sec.73-ssec.1) An authorised officer holds office on the conditions stated in the instrument of appointment.\n(sec.73-ssec.2) An authorised officer— if the appointment provides for a term of appointment—ceases holding office at the end of the term; and may resign by signed notice of resignation given to the general manager; and if the conditions of appointment provide—ceases holding office as an authorised officer on ceasing to hold another office stated in the appointment conditions (the main office ).\n(sec.73-ssec.3) However, an authorised officer may not resign from the office of authorised officer (the secondary office ) under subsection (2) (b) if a term of the authorised officer’s employment to the main office requires the authorised officer to hold the secondary office.\n- (a) if the appointment provides for a term of appointment—ceases holding office at the end of the term; and\n- (b) may resign by signed notice of resignation given to the general manager; and\n- (c) if the conditions of appointment provide—ceases holding office as an authorised officer on ceasing to hold another office stated in the appointment conditions (the main office ).","sortOrder":138},{"sectionNumber":"sec.74","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authorised officer’s identity card","content":"### sec.74 Authorised officer’s identity card\n\nThe general manager must give each authorised officer an identity card.\nThe identity card must—\ncontain a recent photograph of the authorised officer; and\nbe signed by the authorised officer; and\ninclude an expiry date.\nA person who ceases to be an authorised officer must return the identity card to the general manager within 21 days after the person ceases to be an authorised officer, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—40 penalty units.\nThis section does not prevent the giving of a single identity card to a person under this section and for other provisions, Acts or purposes.\ns 74 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2006 No. 21 s 19\n(sec.74-ssec.1) The general manager must give each authorised officer an identity card.\n(sec.74-ssec.2) The identity card must— contain a recent photograph of the authorised officer; and be signed by the authorised officer; and include an expiry date.\n(sec.74-ssec.3) A person who ceases to be an authorised officer must return the identity card to the general manager within 21 days after the person ceases to be an authorised officer, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—40 penalty units.\n(sec.74-ssec.4) This section does not prevent the giving of a single identity card to a person under this section and for other provisions, Acts or purposes.\n- (a) contain a recent photograph of the authorised officer; and\n- (b) be signed by the authorised officer; and\n- (c) include an expiry date.","sortOrder":139},{"sectionNumber":"sec.75","sectionType":"section","heading":"Production or display of authorised officer’s identity card","content":"### sec.75 Production or display of authorised officer’s identity card\n\nAn authorised officer may exercise a power in relation to someone else if the officer—\nfirst produces the officer’s identity card for the person’s inspection; or\nhas the identity card displayed so it is clearly visible to the person.\nIf, for any reason, it is not practicable to comply with subsection (1) , the authorised officer must produce the identity card for inspection by the person at the first reasonable opportunity.\n(sec.75-ssec.1) An authorised officer may exercise a power in relation to someone else if the officer— first produces the officer’s identity card for the person’s inspection; or has the identity card displayed so it is clearly visible to the person.\n(sec.75-ssec.2) If, for any reason, it is not practicable to comply with subsection (1) , the authorised officer must produce the identity card for inspection by the person at the first reasonable opportunity.\n- (a) first produces the officer’s identity card for the person’s inspection; or\n- (b) has the identity card displayed so it is clearly visible to the person.","sortOrder":140},{"sectionNumber":"sec.76","sectionType":"section","heading":"Protection from liability","content":"### sec.76 Protection from liability\n\nAn authorised officer or a person acting under the direction of an authorised officer is not civilly liable for an act or omission done honestly and without negligence under this Act.\nIf subsection (1) prevents a civil liability attaching to an authorised officer or person, the liability attaches instead to the State.\ns 76 amd 2006 No. 21 s 20\n(sec.76-ssec.1) An authorised officer or a person acting under the direction of an authorised officer is not civilly liable for an act or omission done honestly and without negligence under this Act.\n(sec.76-ssec.2) If subsection (1) prevents a civil liability attaching to an authorised officer or person, the liability attaches instead to the State.","sortOrder":141},{"sectionNumber":"pt.12-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Powers of authorised officers","content":"## Powers of authorised officers","sortOrder":142},{"sectionNumber":"sec.77","sectionType":"section","heading":"Entry to place by authorised officers","content":"### sec.77 Entry to place by authorised officers\n\nAn authorised officer may enter a place under this section if—\nits occupier consents to the entry; or\nthe entry is authorised by a warrant.\nAn authorised officer, without the occupier’s consent or a warrant, may—\nenter a public place when the place is open to the public; or\nenter the land (including the curtilage) around premises to ask the occupier of the premises for consent to enter the premises.\nThe power of entry given to an authorised officer under this section is in addition to the powers of entry given to an authorised officer under other provisions of this part.\nUnless entry is authorised by warrant, an authorised officer may only exercise the powers mentioned in section 81 for a place if its occupier consents to the use of the powers when consent for entry is given.\n(sec.77-ssec.1) An authorised officer may enter a place under this section if— its occupier consents to the entry; or the entry is authorised by a warrant.\n(sec.77-ssec.2) An authorised officer, without the occupier’s consent or a warrant, may— enter a public place when the place is open to the public; or enter the land (including the curtilage) around premises to ask the occupier of the premises for consent to enter the premises.\n(sec.77-ssec.3) The power of entry given to an authorised officer under this section is in addition to the powers of entry given to an authorised officer under other provisions of this part.\n(sec.77-ssec.4) Unless entry is authorised by warrant, an authorised officer may only exercise the powers mentioned in section 81 for a place if its occupier consents to the use of the powers when consent for entry is given.\n- (a) its occupier consents to the entry; or\n- (b) the entry is authorised by a warrant.\n- (a) enter a public place when the place is open to the public; or\n- (b) enter the land (including the curtilage) around premises to ask the occupier of the premises for consent to enter the premises.","sortOrder":143},{"sectionNumber":"sec.78","sectionType":"section","heading":"Warrants for entry","content":"### sec.78 Warrants for entry\n\nAn authorised officer may apply to a magistrate for a warrant for a place.\nThe application must be sworn and state the grounds on which the warrant is sought.\nThe magistrate may refuse to consider the application until the authorised officer gives the magistrate all the information the magistrate requires about the application in the way the magistrate requires.\nThe magistrate may require additional information supporting the application be given by statutory declaration.\nThe magistrate may issue the warrant only if the magistrate is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting—\nthere is a particular thing or activity (the evidence ) that may provide evidence of an offence against this Act; and\nthe evidence is, or may be within the next 7 days, at the place.\nA warrant must state—\nthat the authorised officer may, with necessary and reasonable help and force, enter the place and exercise the authorised officer’s powers under this Act; and\nthe evidence for which the warrant is issued; and\nthe hours when entry may be made; and\nthe day, within 14 days after the warrant’s issue, the warrant ends.\nThe magistrate must record the reasons for issuing the warrant.\n(sec.78-ssec.1) An authorised officer may apply to a magistrate for a warrant for a place.\n(sec.78-ssec.2) The application must be sworn and state the grounds on which the warrant is sought.\n(sec.78-ssec.3) The magistrate may refuse to consider the application until the authorised officer gives the magistrate all the information the magistrate requires about the application in the way the magistrate requires. The magistrate may require additional information supporting the application be given by statutory declaration.\n(sec.78-ssec.4) The magistrate may issue the warrant only if the magistrate is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting— there is a particular thing or activity (the evidence ) that may provide evidence of an offence against this Act; and the evidence is, or may be within the next 7 days, at the place.\n(sec.78-ssec.5) A warrant must state— that the authorised officer may, with necessary and reasonable help and force, enter the place and exercise the authorised officer’s powers under this Act; and the evidence for which the warrant is issued; and the hours when entry may be made; and the day, within 14 days after the warrant’s issue, the warrant ends.\n(sec.78-ssec.6) The magistrate must record the reasons for issuing the warrant.\n- (a) there is a particular thing or activity (the evidence ) that may provide evidence of an offence against this Act; and\n- (b) the evidence is, or may be within the next 7 days, at the place.\n- (a) that the authorised officer may, with necessary and reasonable help and force, enter the place and exercise the authorised officer’s powers under this Act; and\n- (b) the evidence for which the warrant is issued; and\n- (c) the hours when entry may be made; and\n- (d) the day, within 14 days after the warrant’s issue, the warrant ends.","sortOrder":144},{"sectionNumber":"sec.79","sectionType":"section","heading":"Warrants—applications made otherwise than in person","content":"### sec.79 Warrants—applications made otherwise than in person\n\nAn authorised officer may apply for a warrant by phone, fax, radio or another form of communication if the officer considers it necessary because of urgent circumstances or other special circumstances, including, for example, the officer’s remote location.\nBefore applying for the warrant, the authorised officer must prepare an application stating the grounds on which the warrant is sought.\nThe authorised officer may apply for the warrant before the application is sworn.\nAfter issuing the warrant, the magistrate must immediately fax a copy to the authorised officer if it is reasonably practicable to fax the copy.\nIf it is not reasonably practicable to fax a copy of the warrant to the authorised officer—\nthe magistrate must—\nrecord on the warrant the reasons for issuing the warrant; and\ntell the authorised officer the date and time the warrant was signed; and\ntell the authorised officer the warrant’s terms; and\nthe authorised officer must write on a form of warrant (the warrant form )—\nthe magistrate’s name; and\nthe date and time the magistrate signed the warrant; and\nthe warrant’s terms.\nThe facsimile warrant, or the warrant form properly completed by the authorised officer, authorises the entry and the exercise of the other powers mentioned in the warrant issued by the magistrate.\nThe authorised officer must, at the first reasonable opportunity, send to the magistrate—\nthe sworn application; and\nif a warrant form was completed by the authorised officer—the completed warrant form.\nOn receiving the documents, the magistrate must attach them to the warrant.\nUnless the contrary is proven, a court must presume a power exercised by an authorised officer was not authorised by a warrant issued under this section if—\na question arises, in a proceeding before the court, whether the exercise of power was authorised by a warrant; and\nthe warrant is not produced in evidence.\n(sec.79-ssec.1) An authorised officer may apply for a warrant by phone, fax, radio or another form of communication if the officer considers it necessary because of urgent circumstances or other special circumstances, including, for example, the officer’s remote location.\n(sec.79-ssec.2) Before applying for the warrant, the authorised officer must prepare an application stating the grounds on which the warrant is sought.\n(sec.79-ssec.3) The authorised officer may apply for the warrant before the application is sworn.\n(sec.79-ssec.4) After issuing the warrant, the magistrate must immediately fax a copy to the authorised officer if it is reasonably practicable to fax the copy.\n(sec.79-ssec.5) If it is not reasonably practicable to fax a copy of the warrant to the authorised officer— the magistrate must— record on the warrant the reasons for issuing the warrant; and tell the authorised officer the date and time the warrant was signed; and tell the authorised officer the warrant’s terms; and the authorised officer must write on a form of warrant (the warrant form )— the magistrate’s name; and the date and time the magistrate signed the warrant; and the warrant’s terms.\n(sec.79-ssec.6) The facsimile warrant, or the warrant form properly completed by the authorised officer, authorises the entry and the exercise of the other powers mentioned in the warrant issued by the magistrate.\n(sec.79-ssec.7) The authorised officer must, at the first reasonable opportunity, send to the magistrate— the sworn application; and if a warrant form was completed by the authorised officer—the completed warrant form.\n(sec.79-ssec.8) On receiving the documents, the magistrate must attach them to the warrant.\n(sec.79-ssec.9) Unless the contrary is proven, a court must presume a power exercised by an authorised officer was not authorised by a warrant issued under this section if— a question arises, in a proceeding before the court, whether the exercise of power was authorised by a warrant; and the warrant is not produced in evidence.\n- (a) the magistrate must— (i) record on the warrant the reasons for issuing the warrant; and (ii) tell the authorised officer the date and time the warrant was signed; and (iii) tell the authorised officer the warrant’s terms; and\n- (i) record on the warrant the reasons for issuing the warrant; and\n- (ii) tell the authorised officer the date and time the warrant was signed; and\n- (iii) tell the authorised officer the warrant’s terms; and\n- (b) the authorised officer must write on a form of warrant (the warrant form )— (i) the magistrate’s name; and (ii) the date and time the magistrate signed the warrant; and (iii) the warrant’s terms.\n- (i) the magistrate’s name; and\n- (ii) the date and time the magistrate signed the warrant; and\n- (iii) the warrant’s terms.\n- (i) record on the warrant the reasons for issuing the warrant; and\n- (ii) tell the authorised officer the date and time the warrant was signed; and\n- (iii) tell the authorised officer the warrant’s terms; and\n- (i) the magistrate’s name; and\n- (ii) the date and time the magistrate signed the warrant; and\n- (iii) the warrant’s terms.\n- (a) the sworn application; and\n- (b) if a warrant form was completed by the authorised officer—the completed warrant form.\n- (a) a question arises, in a proceeding before the court, whether the exercise of power was authorised by a warrant; and\n- (b) the warrant is not produced in evidence.","sortOrder":145},{"sectionNumber":"sec.80","sectionType":"section","heading":"Boarding of ships","content":"### sec.80 Boarding of ships\n\nAn authorised officer may board a ship at any time to find out whether this Act is being or has been complied with.\nAn authorised officer may also board a ship at any time if the officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that—\nthe ship is being, or has been, used in the commission of an offence against this Act; or\nthe ship, or a document or other thing in or on the ship, may provide evidence of the commission of an offence against this Act.\nHowever, an authorised officer must not board a ship if to do so would put the ship, or someone on the ship, at risk from damage or injury.\nIf the ship is moving or about to move, the authorised officer may signal the person in command of the ship or, if no person is in command of the ship, the person in control of the ship to stop the ship or not to move it.\nTo enable the ship to be boarded, the authorised officer may—\nact with any necessary and reasonable help and force; and\nrequire the person in control of the ship to give reasonable help to the officer.\nA person must obey a signal under subsection (4) , unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\nA person must comply with a requirement under subsection (5) (b) , unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\nIt is a reasonable excuse for a person to disobey a signal under subsection (4) if—\nthe person reasonably believes that to obey the signal immediately would put the ship, or someone on the ship, at risk from damage or injury; and\nthe person obeys the signal as soon as it is practicable to obey the signal.\n(sec.80-ssec.1) An authorised officer may board a ship at any time to find out whether this Act is being or has been complied with.\n(sec.80-ssec.2) An authorised officer may also board a ship at any time if the officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that— the ship is being, or has been, used in the commission of an offence against this Act; or the ship, or a document or other thing in or on the ship, may provide evidence of the commission of an offence against this Act.\n(sec.80-ssec.3) However, an authorised officer must not board a ship if to do so would put the ship, or someone on the ship, at risk from damage or injury.\n(sec.80-ssec.4) If the ship is moving or about to move, the authorised officer may signal the person in command of the ship or, if no person is in command of the ship, the person in control of the ship to stop the ship or not to move it.\n(sec.80-ssec.5) To enable the ship to be boarded, the authorised officer may— act with any necessary and reasonable help and force; and require the person in control of the ship to give reasonable help to the officer.\n(sec.80-ssec.6) A person must obey a signal under subsection (4) , unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n(sec.80-ssec.7) A person must comply with a requirement under subsection (5) (b) , unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n(sec.80-ssec.8) It is a reasonable excuse for a person to disobey a signal under subsection (4) if— the person reasonably believes that to obey the signal immediately would put the ship, or someone on the ship, at risk from damage or injury; and the person obeys the signal as soon as it is practicable to obey the signal.\n- (a) the ship is being, or has been, used in the commission of an offence against this Act; or\n- (b) the ship, or a document or other thing in or on the ship, may provide evidence of the commission of an offence against this Act.\n- (a) act with any necessary and reasonable help and force; and\n- (b) require the person in control of the ship to give reasonable help to the officer.\n- (a) the person reasonably believes that to obey the signal immediately would put the ship, or someone on the ship, at risk from damage or injury; and\n- (b) the person obeys the signal as soon as it is practicable to obey the signal.","sortOrder":146},{"sectionNumber":"sec.81","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authorised officer’s general powers for ships and places","content":"### sec.81 Authorised officer’s general powers for ships and places\n\nAn authorised officer who boards a ship or enters a place under this part may—\nsearch any part of the ship or place; or\ninspect, examine, test, measure, photograph or film anything in or on the ship or place or require a thing to be tested or measured; or\ntake samples of any pollutant, substance or thing in or on the ship or place; or\nrecord, measure, test or analyse the release of pollutants into coastal waters from the ship; or\ncopy a document in or on the ship or place; or\ntake onto or into the ship or place any persons, equipment and materials the authorised officer reasonably requires for exercising a power under this Act; or\ninstall or maintain any equipment and materials in or on the ship or place the authorised officer reasonably requires for a monitoring program for the release of pollutants into coastal waters from the ship; or\nrequire the ship’s master, or any person in or on the ship, or occupier of the place to give the authorised officer reasonable help for the exercise of the powers mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (g) ; or\nfor a ship—by written notice given to the person in control of the ship, require the person—\nto bring the ship to a stated place; and\nto remain in control of the ship at the place for a reasonable time;\nto enable the officer to exercise the powers mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (g) .\nIf, for any reason, it is not practicable to make a requirement under subsection (1) (i) by written notice, the requirement may be made orally and confirmed by written notice as soon as practicable.\nAn authorised officer must not enter a part of a ship that is used only as a living area, or exercise powers under subsection (1) (a) to (g) in relation to the part, unless the authorised officer is accompanied by the master or other person in control of the ship.\nSubsection (3) does not apply if the master or other person is unavailable or unwilling to accompany the authorised officer or the authorised officer is unable for another reason to comply with the subsection.\n(sec.81-ssec.1) An authorised officer who boards a ship or enters a place under this part may— search any part of the ship or place; or inspect, examine, test, measure, photograph or film anything in or on the ship or place or require a thing to be tested or measured; or take samples of any pollutant, substance or thing in or on the ship or place; or record, measure, test or analyse the release of pollutants into coastal waters from the ship; or copy a document in or on the ship or place; or take onto or into the ship or place any persons, equipment and materials the authorised officer reasonably requires for exercising a power under this Act; or install or maintain any equipment and materials in or on the ship or place the authorised officer reasonably requires for a monitoring program for the release of pollutants into coastal waters from the ship; or require the ship’s master, or any person in or on the ship, or occupier of the place to give the authorised officer reasonable help for the exercise of the powers mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (g) ; or for a ship—by written notice given to the person in control of the ship, require the person— to bring the ship to a stated place; and to remain in control of the ship at the place for a reasonable time; to enable the officer to exercise the powers mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (g) .\n(sec.81-ssec.2) If, for any reason, it is not practicable to make a requirement under subsection (1) (i) by written notice, the requirement may be made orally and confirmed by written notice as soon as practicable.\n(sec.81-ssec.3) An authorised officer must not enter a part of a ship that is used only as a living area, or exercise powers under subsection (1) (a) to (g) in relation to the part, unless the authorised officer is accompanied by the master or other person in control of the ship.\n(sec.81-ssec.4) Subsection (3) does not apply if the master or other person is unavailable or unwilling to accompany the authorised officer or the authorised officer is unable for another reason to comply with the subsection.\n- (a) search any part of the ship or place; or\n- (b) inspect, examine, test, measure, photograph or film anything in or on the ship or place or require a thing to be tested or measured; or\n- (c) take samples of any pollutant, substance or thing in or on the ship or place; or\n- (d) record, measure, test or analyse the release of pollutants into coastal waters from the ship; or\n- (e) copy a document in or on the ship or place; or\n- (f) take onto or into the ship or place any persons, equipment and materials the authorised officer reasonably requires for exercising a power under this Act; or\n- (g) install or maintain any equipment and materials in or on the ship or place the authorised officer reasonably requires for a monitoring program for the release of pollutants into coastal waters from the ship; or\n- (h) require the ship’s master, or any person in or on the ship, or occupier of the place to give the authorised officer reasonable help for the exercise of the powers mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (g) ; or\n- (i) for a ship—by written notice given to the person in control of the ship, require the person— (i) to bring the ship to a stated place; and (ii) to remain in control of the ship at the place for a reasonable time;\n- (i) to bring the ship to a stated place; and\n- (ii) to remain in control of the ship at the place for a reasonable time;\n- (i) to bring the ship to a stated place; and\n- (ii) to remain in control of the ship at the place for a reasonable time;","sortOrder":147},{"sectionNumber":"sec.82","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to seize evidence from places","content":"### sec.82 Power to seize evidence from places\n\nAn authorised officer who enters a place under this part with a warrant may seize the evidence for which the warrant was issued.\nAn authorised officer who enters a place under this part with the occupier’s consent may seize a thing if—\nthe authorised officer believes on reasonable grounds the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and\nseizure of the thing is consistent with the purpose of entry as told to the occupier in seeking the occupier’s consent.\nAn authorised officer may also seize another thing if the officer believes on reasonable grounds—\nthe thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and\nthe seizure is necessary to prevent the thing being—\nconcealed, lost or destroyed; or\nused to commit, continue or repeat the offence.\nHaving seized a thing, an authorised officer may—\nremove the thing from the place where the thing was seized (the place of seizure ) to another place; or\nleave the thing at the place of seizure but restrict access to the thing.\nAn authorised officer may—\nseal a thing and mark it to show it has been seized; or\nseal the entrance to a room where the seized thing is situated and mark it to show it contains a thing that has been seized.\nIf an authorised officer restricts access to a seized thing, a person must not tamper with the thing without the approval of the general manager.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\ns 82 amd 2006 No. 21 s 21\n(sec.82-ssec.1) An authorised officer who enters a place under this part with a warrant may seize the evidence for which the warrant was issued.\n(sec.82-ssec.2) An authorised officer who enters a place under this part with the occupier’s consent may seize a thing if— the authorised officer believes on reasonable grounds the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and seizure of the thing is consistent with the purpose of entry as told to the occupier in seeking the occupier’s consent.\n(sec.82-ssec.3) An authorised officer may also seize another thing if the officer believes on reasonable grounds— the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and the seizure is necessary to prevent the thing being— concealed, lost or destroyed; or used to commit, continue or repeat the offence.\n(sec.82-ssec.4) Having seized a thing, an authorised officer may— remove the thing from the place where the thing was seized (the place of seizure ) to another place; or leave the thing at the place of seizure but restrict access to the thing. An authorised officer may— seal a thing and mark it to show it has been seized; or seal the entrance to a room where the seized thing is situated and mark it to show it contains a thing that has been seized.\n(sec.82-ssec.5) If an authorised officer restricts access to a seized thing, a person must not tamper with the thing without the approval of the general manager. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n- (a) the authorised officer believes on reasonable grounds the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and\n- (b) seizure of the thing is consistent with the purpose of entry as told to the occupier in seeking the occupier’s consent.\n- (a) the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and\n- (b) the seizure is necessary to prevent the thing being— (i) concealed, lost or destroyed; or (ii) used to commit, continue or repeat the offence.\n- (i) concealed, lost or destroyed; or\n- (ii) used to commit, continue or repeat the offence.\n- (i) concealed, lost or destroyed; or\n- (ii) used to commit, continue or repeat the offence.\n- (a) remove the thing from the place where the thing was seized (the place of seizure ) to another place; or\n- (b) leave the thing at the place of seizure but restrict access to the thing.\n- (a) seal a thing and mark it to show it has been seized; or\n- (b) seal the entrance to a room where the seized thing is situated and mark it to show it contains a thing that has been seized.","sortOrder":148},{"sectionNumber":"sec.83","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to seize after boarding ship","content":"### sec.83 Power to seize after boarding ship\n\nAn authorised officer who boards a ship under this part may seize a thing in or on the ship if the officer believes, on reasonable grounds—\nthe thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and\nthe seizure is necessary to prevent the thing being—\nconcealed, lost or destroyed; or\nused to commit, continue or repeat the offence.\nHaving seized a thing, an authorised officer may—\nremove the thing from the place where the thing was seized (the place of seizure ) to another place; or\nleave the thing at the place of seizure but restrict access to the thing.\nAn authorised officer may—\nseal a thing and mark it to show it has been seized; or\nseal the entrance to a room where the seized thing is situated and mark it to show it contains a thing that has been seized.\nIf an authorised officer restricts access to a seized thing, a person must not tamper with the thing without the approval of the general manager.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\ns 83 amd 2006 No. 21 s 22\n(sec.83-ssec.1) An authorised officer who boards a ship under this part may seize a thing in or on the ship if the officer believes, on reasonable grounds— the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and the seizure is necessary to prevent the thing being— concealed, lost or destroyed; or used to commit, continue or repeat the offence.\n(sec.83-ssec.2) Having seized a thing, an authorised officer may— remove the thing from the place where the thing was seized (the place of seizure ) to another place; or leave the thing at the place of seizure but restrict access to the thing. An authorised officer may— seal a thing and mark it to show it has been seized; or seal the entrance to a room where the seized thing is situated and mark it to show it contains a thing that has been seized.\n(sec.83-ssec.3) If an authorised officer restricts access to a seized thing, a person must not tamper with the thing without the approval of the general manager. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n- (a) the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act; and\n- (b) the seizure is necessary to prevent the thing being— (i) concealed, lost or destroyed; or (ii) used to commit, continue or repeat the offence.\n- (i) concealed, lost or destroyed; or\n- (ii) used to commit, continue or repeat the offence.\n- (i) concealed, lost or destroyed; or\n- (ii) used to commit, continue or repeat the offence.\n- (a) remove the thing from the place where the thing was seized (the place of seizure ) to another place; or\n- (b) leave the thing at the place of seizure but restrict access to the thing.\n- (a) seal a thing and mark it to show it has been seized; or\n- (b) seal the entrance to a room where the seized thing is situated and mark it to show it contains a thing that has been seized.","sortOrder":149},{"sectionNumber":"sec.84","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to detain ship","content":"### sec.84 Power to detain ship\n\nAn authorised officer for the State may detain a ship if the officer has clear grounds for believing a discharge offence has happened because of acts or omissions in relation to the ship in coastal waters.\nSee Article 220 (2) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982.\nThe authorised officer may, after detaining a ship, order the ship’s master to move the ship to a reasonable stated place.\nThe ship’s master must comply with the order, unless the master has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—3,500 penalty units.\nThe authorised officer may, acting with any necessary and reasonable help and force, escort the ship to the place.\nIf, before the ship is released from detention, the ship leaves the place, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence, unless there was a reasonable excuse for the ship leaving the place.\nMaximum penalty—3,500 penalty units.\nIn this section—\ndischarge offence means a discharge offence within the meaning of part 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 or 9 .\ns 84 amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.84-ssec.1) An authorised officer for the State may detain a ship if the officer has clear grounds for believing a discharge offence has happened because of acts or omissions in relation to the ship in coastal waters. See Article 220 (2) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982.\n(sec.84-ssec.2) The authorised officer may, after detaining a ship, order the ship’s master to move the ship to a reasonable stated place.\n(sec.84-ssec.3) The ship’s master must comply with the order, unless the master has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—3,500 penalty units.\n(sec.84-ssec.4) The authorised officer may, acting with any necessary and reasonable help and force, escort the ship to the place.\n(sec.84-ssec.5) If, before the ship is released from detention, the ship leaves the place, the ship’s owner and master each commit an offence, unless there was a reasonable excuse for the ship leaving the place. Maximum penalty—3,500 penalty units.\n(sec.84-ssec.6) In this section— discharge offence means a discharge offence within the meaning of part 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 or 9 .","sortOrder":150},{"sectionNumber":"sec.85","sectionType":"section","heading":"Procedure after detention of ship","content":"### sec.85 Procedure after detention of ship\n\nAs soon as practicable after a ship is detained by an authorised officer under section 84 , the officer must give to the ship’s master an approved notice stating that the ship—\nis detained; and\nmay be released on giving security worked out under section 113 .\n- (a) is detained; and\n- (b) may be released on giving security worked out under section 113 .","sortOrder":151},{"sectionNumber":"sec.86","sectionType":"section","heading":"Procedure after seizure of evidence","content":"### sec.86 Procedure after seizure of evidence\n\nThis section does not apply to a ship detained under section 84 .\nAs soon as practicable after a thing is seized by an authorised officer under this part, the officer must give a receipt for it to the person from whom it was seized.\nThe receipt must describe generally each thing seized and its condition.\nIf, for any reason, it is not practicable to comply with subsection (2) , the officer must leave the receipt at the place of seizure in a reasonably secure way and in a conspicuous position.\nSubsection (2) does not apply if—\nthe thing is unattended when seized; and\nthe thing’s owner is unknown; and\nthe owner cannot be found after reasonable inquiries (given the thing’s value) have been made.\nUntil a seized thing is returned or otherwise finally dealt with, an authorised officer must allow a person who would be entitled to a seized thing if it were not in the officer’s possession—\nto inspect it; and\nif it is a document—to make copies of it.\nThe officer must return a seized thing to the person at the end of—\n6 months; or\nif a prosecution for an offence involving it is started within 6 months—the prosecution for the offence and any appeal from the prosecution.\nDespite subsection (7) , the officer must return the seized thing to the person immediately the officer stops being satisfied its retention as evidence is necessary.\nHowever, the officer need not return the seized thing if the officer believes, on reasonable grounds, it is necessary to retain it to prevent its use in committing an offence.\n(sec.86-ssec.1) This section does not apply to a ship detained under section 84 .\n(sec.86-ssec.2) As soon as practicable after a thing is seized by an authorised officer under this part, the officer must give a receipt for it to the person from whom it was seized.\n(sec.86-ssec.3) The receipt must describe generally each thing seized and its condition.\n(sec.86-ssec.4) If, for any reason, it is not practicable to comply with subsection (2) , the officer must leave the receipt at the place of seizure in a reasonably secure way and in a conspicuous position.\n(sec.86-ssec.5) Subsection (2) does not apply if— the thing is unattended when seized; and the thing’s owner is unknown; and the owner cannot be found after reasonable inquiries (given the thing’s value) have been made.\n(sec.86-ssec.6) Until a seized thing is returned or otherwise finally dealt with, an authorised officer must allow a person who would be entitled to a seized thing if it were not in the officer’s possession— to inspect it; and if it is a document—to make copies of it.\n(sec.86-ssec.7) The officer must return a seized thing to the person at the end of— 6 months; or if a prosecution for an offence involving it is started within 6 months—the prosecution for the offence and any appeal from the prosecution.\n(sec.86-ssec.8) Despite subsection (7) , the officer must return the seized thing to the person immediately the officer stops being satisfied its retention as evidence is necessary.\n(sec.86-ssec.9) However, the officer need not return the seized thing if the officer believes, on reasonable grounds, it is necessary to retain it to prevent its use in committing an offence.\n- (a) the thing is unattended when seized; and\n- (b) the thing’s owner is unknown; and\n- (c) the owner cannot be found after reasonable inquiries (given the thing’s value) have been made.\n- (a) to inspect it; and\n- (b) if it is a document—to make copies of it.\n- (a) 6 months; or\n- (b) if a prosecution for an offence involving it is started within 6 months—the prosecution for the offence and any appeal from the prosecution.","sortOrder":152},{"sectionNumber":"sec.86A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to give notice in relation to discharge or likely discharge of pollutant","content":"### sec.86A Power to give notice in relation to discharge or likely discharge of pollutant\n\nThis section applies if an authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that a ship has discharged, or is likely to discharge, pollutant into coastal waters.\nThe authorised officer may—\nby written notice given to the owner or master of the ship, require the owner or master—\nto take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time; and\nnot to operate the ship, other than in a way approved by the authorised officer, until the authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters; or\nattach a notice to the ship requiring that the ship not be operated by any person, other than in a way approved by the authorised officer, until the authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters.\nThe authorised officer may make a requirement under subsection (2) (a) orally and confirm the requirement by written notice as soon as practicable.\nThe owner or master of a ship to whom a notice is given under subsection (2) (a) must comply with the requirement stated in the notice unless the owner or master has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nA person must not contravene a requirement under subsection (2) (b) unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nA person does not contravene this Act in relation to a discharge or likely discharge of pollutant from the ship for which an authorised officer issued a notice under subsection (2) merely because the person complies with a requirement in the notice.\nFor subsection (2) (b) , if the authorised officer knows the identity of the owner or master of the ship, the authorised officer—\nmust give the owner or master of the ship a copy of the requirement as soon as practicable; and\nmay, by written notice given to the owner or master of the ship, require the owner or master to take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time in relation to the ship.\nThe owner or master of a ship to whom a notice is given under subsection (7) (b) must comply with the requirement stated in the notice unless the owner or master has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nIf a requirement is given under subsection (2) (a) (i) or (7) (b) , the authorised officer may, if requested by the owner or master of the ship, allow the ship to operate before the end of the stated reasonable time in the direction if—\nthe stated reasonable action in the direction has been taken; and\nthe authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters.\ns 86A ins 2010 No. 19 s 230\n(sec.86A-ssec.1) This section applies if an authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that a ship has discharged, or is likely to discharge, pollutant into coastal waters.\n(sec.86A-ssec.2) The authorised officer may— by written notice given to the owner or master of the ship, require the owner or master— to take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time; and not to operate the ship, other than in a way approved by the authorised officer, until the authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters; or attach a notice to the ship requiring that the ship not be operated by any person, other than in a way approved by the authorised officer, until the authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters.\n(sec.86A-ssec.3) The authorised officer may make a requirement under subsection (2) (a) orally and confirm the requirement by written notice as soon as practicable.\n(sec.86A-ssec.4) The owner or master of a ship to whom a notice is given under subsection (2) (a) must comply with the requirement stated in the notice unless the owner or master has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.86A-ssec.5) A person must not contravene a requirement under subsection (2) (b) unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.86A-ssec.6) A person does not contravene this Act in relation to a discharge or likely discharge of pollutant from the ship for which an authorised officer issued a notice under subsection (2) merely because the person complies with a requirement in the notice.\n(sec.86A-ssec.7) For subsection (2) (b) , if the authorised officer knows the identity of the owner or master of the ship, the authorised officer— must give the owner or master of the ship a copy of the requirement as soon as practicable; and may, by written notice given to the owner or master of the ship, require the owner or master to take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time in relation to the ship.\n(sec.86A-ssec.8) The owner or master of a ship to whom a notice is given under subsection (7) (b) must comply with the requirement stated in the notice unless the owner or master has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.86A-ssec.9) If a requirement is given under subsection (2) (a) (i) or (7) (b) , the authorised officer may, if requested by the owner or master of the ship, allow the ship to operate before the end of the stated reasonable time in the direction if— the stated reasonable action in the direction has been taken; and the authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters.\n- (a) by written notice given to the owner or master of the ship, require the owner or master— (i) to take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time; and (ii) not to operate the ship, other than in a way approved by the authorised officer, until the authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters; or\n- (i) to take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time; and\n- (ii) not to operate the ship, other than in a way approved by the authorised officer, until the authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters; or\n- (b) attach a notice to the ship requiring that the ship not be operated by any person, other than in a way approved by the authorised officer, until the authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters.\n- (i) to take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time; and\n- (ii) not to operate the ship, other than in a way approved by the authorised officer, until the authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters; or\n- (a) must give the owner or master of the ship a copy of the requirement as soon as practicable; and\n- (b) may, by written notice given to the owner or master of the ship, require the owner or master to take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time in relation to the ship.\n- (a) the stated reasonable action in the direction has been taken; and\n- (b) the authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the ship is not likely to discharge pollutant into coastal waters.","sortOrder":153},{"sectionNumber":"pt.12-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Other enforcement powers of authorised officers","content":"## Other enforcement powers of authorised officers","sortOrder":154},{"sectionNumber":"sec.87","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to require name and address","content":"### sec.87 Power to require name and address\n\nAn authorised officer may require a person to state the person’s name and address if the officer—\nfinds the person committing an offence against this Act; or\nfinds the person in circumstances that lead, or has information that leads, the officer to suspect on reasonable grounds the person has just committed an offence against this Act.\nWhen making the requirement, the authorised officer must warn the person it is an offence to fail to state the person’s name and address unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nThe authorised officer may require the person to give evidence of the correctness of the person’s name or address if the officer suspects, on reasonable grounds, that the stated name or address is false.\nA person must comply with a requirement under subsection (1) or (3) , unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nThe person does not commit an offence against this section if—\nthe authorised officer required the person to state the person’s name and address on suspicion of the person having committed an offence against this Act; and\nthe person is not proved to have committed the offence.\n(sec.87-ssec.1) An authorised officer may require a person to state the person’s name and address if the officer— finds the person committing an offence against this Act; or finds the person in circumstances that lead, or has information that leads, the officer to suspect on reasonable grounds the person has just committed an offence against this Act.\n(sec.87-ssec.2) When making the requirement, the authorised officer must warn the person it is an offence to fail to state the person’s name and address unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\n(sec.87-ssec.3) The authorised officer may require the person to give evidence of the correctness of the person’s name or address if the officer suspects, on reasonable grounds, that the stated name or address is false.\n(sec.87-ssec.4) A person must comply with a requirement under subsection (1) or (3) , unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.87-ssec.5) The person does not commit an offence against this section if— the authorised officer required the person to state the person’s name and address on suspicion of the person having committed an offence against this Act; and the person is not proved to have committed the offence.\n- (a) finds the person committing an offence against this Act; or\n- (b) finds the person in circumstances that lead, or has information that leads, the officer to suspect on reasonable grounds the person has just committed an offence against this Act.\n- (a) the authorised officer required the person to state the person’s name and address on suspicion of the person having committed an offence against this Act; and\n- (b) the person is not proved to have committed the offence.","sortOrder":155},{"sectionNumber":"sec.88","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to require information from certain persons","content":"### sec.88 Power to require information from certain persons\n\nThis section applies if an authorised officer suspects, on reasonable grounds—\nan offence against this Act has happened; and\na person may be able to give information about the offence.\nThe authorised officer may require the person to give information about the suspected offence.\nWhen making the requirement, the authorised officer must warn the person it is an offence to fail to give the information unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\n(sec.88-ssec.1) This section applies if an authorised officer suspects, on reasonable grounds— an offence against this Act has happened; and a person may be able to give information about the offence.\n(sec.88-ssec.2) The authorised officer may require the person to give information about the suspected offence.\n(sec.88-ssec.3) When making the requirement, the authorised officer must warn the person it is an offence to fail to give the information unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\n- (a) an offence against this Act has happened; and\n- (b) a person may be able to give information about the offence.","sortOrder":156},{"sectionNumber":"sec.89","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to require production of documents","content":"### sec.89 Power to require production of documents\n\nAn authorised officer may require a person to produce to the officer for inspection a document required to be kept by the person—\nunder this Act or the Marine Safety Act ; or\nunder the Commonwealth Navigation Act or the Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983 (Cwlth) ; or\nunder the domestic commercial vessel national law.\nThe person must produce the document for inspection, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nThe authorised officer may keep the document to make a copy of it.\nIf the authorised officer makes a copy of the document, or an entry in the document, the officer may require the person responsible for keeping the document to certify the copy as a true copy of the document or entry.\nThe person responsible for keeping the document must comply with a requirement made under subsection (4) , unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nThe authorised officer must return the document to the person as soon as practicable after making the copy.\ns 89 amd 2001 No. 79 s 57 ; 2016 No. 3 s 72\n(sec.89-ssec.1) An authorised officer may require a person to produce to the officer for inspection a document required to be kept by the person— under this Act or the Marine Safety Act ; or under the Commonwealth Navigation Act or the Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983 (Cwlth) ; or under the domestic commercial vessel national law.\n(sec.89-ssec.2) The person must produce the document for inspection, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.89-ssec.3) The authorised officer may keep the document to make a copy of it.\n(sec.89-ssec.4) If the authorised officer makes a copy of the document, or an entry in the document, the officer may require the person responsible for keeping the document to certify the copy as a true copy of the document or entry.\n(sec.89-ssec.5) The person responsible for keeping the document must comply with a requirement made under subsection (4) , unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.89-ssec.6) The authorised officer must return the document to the person as soon as practicable after making the copy.\n- (a) under this Act or the Marine Safety Act ; or\n- (b) under the Commonwealth Navigation Act or the Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983 (Cwlth) ; or\n- (c) under the domestic commercial vessel national law.","sortOrder":157},{"sectionNumber":"pt.12-div.5","sectionType":"division","heading":"Consent to entry of premises","content":"## Consent to entry of premises","sortOrder":158},{"sectionNumber":"sec.90","sectionType":"section","heading":"Consent to entry","content":"### sec.90 Consent to entry\n\nThis section applies if an authorised officer intends to seek the consent of an occupier of a place to an authorised officer entering the place under this part.\nBefore seeking the consent, the authorised officer must inform the occupier—\nof the purpose of the entry; and\nthat anything found and seized may be used in evidence in court; and\nthat the occupier is not required to consent.\nIf the consent is given, the authorised officer may ask the occupier to sign an acknowledgement of the consent.\nThe acknowledgement must—\nstate the occupier was informed—\nof the purpose of the entry; and\nthat anything found and seized may be used in evidence in court; and\nthat the occupier was not required to consent; and\nstate the occupier gave the authorised officer consent under this part to enter the place and exercise the powers mentioned in section 81 ; and\nstate the time and date the consent was given.\nIf the occupier signs an acknowledgement of consent, the authorised officer must immediately give a copy to the occupier.\n(sec.90-ssec.1) This section applies if an authorised officer intends to seek the consent of an occupier of a place to an authorised officer entering the place under this part.\n(sec.90-ssec.2) Before seeking the consent, the authorised officer must inform the occupier— of the purpose of the entry; and that anything found and seized may be used in evidence in court; and that the occupier is not required to consent.\n(sec.90-ssec.3) If the consent is given, the authorised officer may ask the occupier to sign an acknowledgement of the consent.\n(sec.90-ssec.4) The acknowledgement must— state the occupier was informed— of the purpose of the entry; and that anything found and seized may be used in evidence in court; and that the occupier was not required to consent; and state the occupier gave the authorised officer consent under this part to enter the place and exercise the powers mentioned in section 81 ; and state the time and date the consent was given.\n(sec.90-ssec.5) If the occupier signs an acknowledgement of consent, the authorised officer must immediately give a copy to the occupier.\n- (a) of the purpose of the entry; and\n- (b) that anything found and seized may be used in evidence in court; and\n- (c) that the occupier is not required to consent.\n- (a) state the occupier was informed— (i) of the purpose of the entry; and (ii) that anything found and seized may be used in evidence in court; and (iii) that the occupier was not required to consent; and\n- (i) of the purpose of the entry; and\n- (ii) that anything found and seized may be used in evidence in court; and\n- (iii) that the occupier was not required to consent; and\n- (b) state the occupier gave the authorised officer consent under this part to enter the place and exercise the powers mentioned in section 81 ; and\n- (c) state the time and date the consent was given.\n- (i) of the purpose of the entry; and\n- (ii) that anything found and seized may be used in evidence in court; and\n- (iii) that the occupier was not required to consent; and","sortOrder":159},{"sectionNumber":"sec.91","sectionType":"section","heading":"Evidence of consent","content":"### sec.91 Evidence of consent\n\nThis section applies to a proceeding if—\na question arises whether an occupier of a place consented to the entry of the place by an authorised officer under this part; and\nan acknowledgement under section 90 is not produced in evidence.\nIn a proceeding to which this section applies, the court may presume the occupier did not consent, unless the contrary is proved.\n(sec.91-ssec.1) This section applies to a proceeding if— a question arises whether an occupier of a place consented to the entry of the place by an authorised officer under this part; and an acknowledgement under section 90 is not produced in evidence.\n(sec.91-ssec.2) In a proceeding to which this section applies, the court may presume the occupier did not consent, unless the contrary is proved.\n- (a) a question arises whether an occupier of a place consented to the entry of the place by an authorised officer under this part; and\n- (b) an acknowledgement under section 90 is not produced in evidence.","sortOrder":160},{"sectionNumber":"pt.12-div.6","sectionType":"division","heading":"Response action to discharge and authorised officer’s emergency powers","content":"## Response action to discharge and authorised officer’s emergency powers","sortOrder":161},{"sectionNumber":"sec.92","sectionType":"section","heading":"Purpose of division","content":"### sec.92 Purpose of division\n\nThe purpose of this division is to enable the State, through powers given to the marine pollution controller and authorised officers under this Act, to direct and coordinate the response to a discharge or probable discharge of pollutant into coastal waters.\ns 92 amd 2005 No. 49 s 38 ; 2006 No. 21 s 23","sortOrder":162},{"sectionNumber":"sec.93","sectionType":"section","heading":"State has prime responsibility for directing emergency response","content":"### sec.93 State has prime responsibility for directing emergency response\n\nThis section applies if there is a discharge or probable discharge of pollutant into coastal waters (a relevant discharge ).\nThe State has prime responsibility for directing and coordinating the response to a relevant discharge.\nThe State may enter into an agreement with a port authority or port operator about the port authority or port operator responding to a relevant discharge within the port limits of the port.\nTo the extent stated in either of the following agreements between the State and a port authority or port operator, the port authority or port operator has responsibility within the port limits of the port for directing and coordinating the State’s response if there is a relevant discharge within the port limits—\nan agreement under subsection (3) ;\nan agreement of the type mentioned in subsection (3) entered into before the commencement of this subsection.\nThe State, port authority or port operator may consult with other interested agencies and entities and local governments in preparing a response to a relevant discharge.\ns 93 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2006 No. 21 s 24 ; 2010 No. 19 s 135\n(sec.93-ssec.1) This section applies if there is a discharge or probable discharge of pollutant into coastal waters (a relevant discharge ).\n(sec.93-ssec.2) The State has prime responsibility for directing and coordinating the response to a relevant discharge.\n(sec.93-ssec.3) The State may enter into an agreement with a port authority or port operator about the port authority or port operator responding to a relevant discharge within the port limits of the port.\n(sec.93-ssec.4) To the extent stated in either of the following agreements between the State and a port authority or port operator, the port authority or port operator has responsibility within the port limits of the port for directing and coordinating the State’s response if there is a relevant discharge within the port limits— an agreement under subsection (3) ; an agreement of the type mentioned in subsection (3) entered into before the commencement of this subsection.\n(sec.93-ssec.5) The State, port authority or port operator may consult with other interested agencies and entities and local governments in preparing a response to a relevant discharge.\n- (a) an agreement under subsection (3) ;\n- (b) an agreement of the type mentioned in subsection (3) entered into before the commencement of this subsection.","sortOrder":163},{"sectionNumber":"sec.93A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Marine pollution controller","content":"### sec.93A Marine pollution controller\n\nTo facilitate the State’s fulfilment of its responsibility under section 93 (2) , there is to be a marine pollution controller.\nThe marine pollution controller is the general manager.\nThe function of the marine pollution controller is to direct and coordinate, for the State, the response by the State and other entities if—\nthere is a discharge, or probable discharge, of pollutant into coastal waters; and\nthe discharge, or probable discharge, is serious or potentially serious.\na port authority, a port operator, a local government, an entity established under the law of the Commonwealth\nThe marine pollution controller may perform his or her function under this section only if the marine pollution controller—\nis reasonably satisfied it is necessary to perform the function; and\nhas given written notice to the chief executive that states—\nthe marine pollution controller intends to perform the function; and\nan outline of the circumstances of the discharge or probable discharge.\nIn performing his or her function, the marine pollution controller has all the powers under this Act of—\nthe general manager; and\nan authorised officer.\ns 93A ins 2005 No. 49 s 39\namd 2019 No. 25 s 24\n(sec.93A-ssec.1) To facilitate the State’s fulfilment of its responsibility under section 93 (2) , there is to be a marine pollution controller.\n(sec.93A-ssec.2) The marine pollution controller is the general manager.\n(sec.93A-ssec.3) The function of the marine pollution controller is to direct and coordinate, for the State, the response by the State and other entities if— there is a discharge, or probable discharge, of pollutant into coastal waters; and the discharge, or probable discharge, is serious or potentially serious. a port authority, a port operator, a local government, an entity established under the law of the Commonwealth\n(sec.93A-ssec.4) The marine pollution controller may perform his or her function under this section only if the marine pollution controller— is reasonably satisfied it is necessary to perform the function; and has given written notice to the chief executive that states— the marine pollution controller intends to perform the function; and an outline of the circumstances of the discharge or probable discharge.\n(sec.93A-ssec.5) In performing his or her function, the marine pollution controller has all the powers under this Act of— the general manager; and an authorised officer.\n- (a) there is a discharge, or probable discharge, of pollutant into coastal waters; and\n- (b) the discharge, or probable discharge, is serious or potentially serious.\n- (a) is reasonably satisfied it is necessary to perform the function; and\n- (b) has given written notice to the chief executive that states— (i) the marine pollution controller intends to perform the function; and (ii) an outline of the circumstances of the discharge or probable discharge.\n- (i) the marine pollution controller intends to perform the function; and\n- (ii) an outline of the circumstances of the discharge or probable discharge.\n- (i) the marine pollution controller intends to perform the function; and\n- (ii) an outline of the circumstances of the discharge or probable discharge.\n- (a) the general manager; and\n- (b) an authorised officer.","sortOrder":164},{"sectionNumber":"sec.93B","sectionType":"section","heading":"Protection from liability","content":"### sec.93B Protection from liability\n\nCivil liability does not attach to a protected person because of anything done or omitted to be done under this division as or for the marine pollution controller in good faith without reckless disregard for the possible occurrence of the personal injury or loss or damage to property from which liability would arise, if this section did not apply.\nIf subsection (1) prevents a civil liability attaching to a protected person, the liability attaches instead to the State.\nIn this section—\nprotected person means—\nthe marine pollution controller; or\na person acting under the direction of the marine pollution controller.\ns 93B ins 2005 No. 49 s 39\n(sec.93B-ssec.1) Civil liability does not attach to a protected person because of anything done or omitted to be done under this division as or for the marine pollution controller in good faith without reckless disregard for the possible occurrence of the personal injury or loss or damage to property from which liability would arise, if this section did not apply.\n(sec.93B-ssec.2) If subsection (1) prevents a civil liability attaching to a protected person, the liability attaches instead to the State.\n(sec.93B-ssec.3) In this section— protected person means— the marine pollution controller; or a person acting under the direction of the marine pollution controller.\n- (a) the marine pollution controller; or\n- (b) a person acting under the direction of the marine pollution controller.","sortOrder":165},{"sectionNumber":"sec.94","sectionType":"section","heading":"Emergency declaration may overrule local law","content":"### sec.94 Emergency declaration may overrule local law\n\nThe Minister may, by emergency declaration, declare a local law that is inconsistent with, or hinders, the State’s response to a serious discharge of pollutant into coastal waters is of no effect to the extent, and for the period (not longer than 14 days), mentioned in the Minister’s declaration.\nHowever, the Minister may make the emergency declaration only if the Minister is satisfied that urgent action is needed to deal with the discharge.\nThe declaration must state it is an emergency declaration and outline the nature of the emergency.\nThe Minister is not required to engage in consultation about the declaration.\nAfter notification of the declaration, the Minister may publish it in the ways the Minister considers appropriate having regard to the emergency.\nThe Minister must repeal the declaration as soon as possible after the Minister is satisfied the emergency no longer exists.\nUnless it is earlier repealed, the declaration expires 14 days after it is notified.\nAn emergency declaration is subordinate legislation.\ns 94 amd 2006 No. 21 s 25 ; 2013 No. 39 s 111 sch 4\n(sec.94-ssec.1) The Minister may, by emergency declaration, declare a local law that is inconsistent with, or hinders, the State’s response to a serious discharge of pollutant into coastal waters is of no effect to the extent, and for the period (not longer than 14 days), mentioned in the Minister’s declaration.\n(sec.94-ssec.2) However, the Minister may make the emergency declaration only if the Minister is satisfied that urgent action is needed to deal with the discharge.\n(sec.94-ssec.3) The declaration must state it is an emergency declaration and outline the nature of the emergency.\n(sec.94-ssec.4) The Minister is not required to engage in consultation about the declaration.\n(sec.94-ssec.5) After notification of the declaration, the Minister may publish it in the ways the Minister considers appropriate having regard to the emergency.\n(sec.94-ssec.6) The Minister must repeal the declaration as soon as possible after the Minister is satisfied the emergency no longer exists.\n(sec.94-ssec.7) Unless it is earlier repealed, the declaration expires 14 days after it is notified.\n(sec.94-ssec.8) An emergency declaration is subordinate legislation.","sortOrder":166},{"sectionNumber":"sec.95","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authorised officer’s powers in an emergency","content":"### sec.95 Authorised officer’s powers in an emergency\n\nThis section applies if an authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that—\na discharge of pollutant into coastal waters has happened, or is likely to happen; and\nurgent action is necessary to prevent or minimise the discharge and its effect on Queensland’s marine and coastal environment.\nAn authorised officer may—\ndirect any person to take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time; or\ntake the action, or authorise someone else to take the action.\nWithout limiting subsection (2) , reasonable action includes action—\nto remove, destroy or disperse a discharged pollutant; and\nto prevent the pollutant from reaching a stated place on water or land; and\nto mitigate damage or injury caused to a stated place or thing on water or land by the pollutant; and\nto require any person—\nto do something that assists with action mentioned in paragraph (a) , (b) or (c) ; or\nto stop doing something that may interfere with action mentioned in paragraph (a) , (b) or (c) .\nThe direction may be given orally or by written notice.\nIf the direction is given orally, the authorised officer must, as soon as practicable, confirm the direction by written notice given to the person.\nA person to whom a direction is given under subsection (2) (a) must comply with the direction, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\nIf the authorised officer decides to take the action, the officer may—\nboard any ship or, without a warrant, enter any place and take the action; and\nin taking the action, exercise any of the powers (other than investigatory powers) under this part.\nThe authorised officer may exercise the powers mentioned in subsection (7) ( emergency powers ) with any necessary and reasonable help and force.\nIf a person or thing is obstructing or preventing an authorised officer from boarding a ship or entering a place or taking action on or at any ship or place while the authorised officer is exercising or attempting to exercise emergency powers, a police officer may, if asked by the authorised officer, using any necessary and reasonable force—\nremove the person or thing from the place; and\ntake all reasonable measures to ensure the person or thing does not again obstruct or prevent the action being taken.\nIn exercising or attempting to exercise emergency powers, an authorised officer must take all reasonable steps to ensure the officer causes as little inconvenience, and does as little damage, as is practicable in the circumstances.\nThis section does not limit any power an authorised officer has apart from this section.\nIf an authorised officer authorises a person to take action under subsection (2) (b) —\nthe person may exercise the powers mentioned in subsection (7) (a) ; and\nthe officer must inform the person—\nof the action the person is authorised to take; and\nof the person’s powers under this section; and\nin general terms, of section 109 ; and\nSection 109 imposes on an authorised officer a requirement to give notice of any damage done in the exercise of a power.\nsubsections (8) , (9) and (10) (so far as they relate to the power mentioned in subsection (7) (a) ) apply to the person as if the person were the authorised officer.\ns 95 amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.95-ssec.1) This section applies if an authorised officer is satisfied on reasonable grounds that— a discharge of pollutant into coastal waters has happened, or is likely to happen; and urgent action is necessary to prevent or minimise the discharge and its effect on Queensland’s marine and coastal environment.\n(sec.95-ssec.2) An authorised officer may— direct any person to take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time; or take the action, or authorise someone else to take the action.\n(sec.95-ssec.3) Without limiting subsection (2) , reasonable action includes action— to remove, destroy or disperse a discharged pollutant; and to prevent the pollutant from reaching a stated place on water or land; and to mitigate damage or injury caused to a stated place or thing on water or land by the pollutant; and to require any person— to do something that assists with action mentioned in paragraph (a) , (b) or (c) ; or to stop doing something that may interfere with action mentioned in paragraph (a) , (b) or (c) .\n(sec.95-ssec.4) The direction may be given orally or by written notice.\n(sec.95-ssec.5) If the direction is given orally, the authorised officer must, as soon as practicable, confirm the direction by written notice given to the person.\n(sec.95-ssec.6) A person to whom a direction is given under subsection (2) (a) must comply with the direction, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n(sec.95-ssec.7) If the authorised officer decides to take the action, the officer may— board any ship or, without a warrant, enter any place and take the action; and in taking the action, exercise any of the powers (other than investigatory powers) under this part.\n(sec.95-ssec.8) The authorised officer may exercise the powers mentioned in subsection (7) ( emergency powers ) with any necessary and reasonable help and force.\n(sec.95-ssec.9) If a person or thing is obstructing or preventing an authorised officer from boarding a ship or entering a place or taking action on or at any ship or place while the authorised officer is exercising or attempting to exercise emergency powers, a police officer may, if asked by the authorised officer, using any necessary and reasonable force— remove the person or thing from the place; and take all reasonable measures to ensure the person or thing does not again obstruct or prevent the action being taken.\n(sec.95-ssec.10) In exercising or attempting to exercise emergency powers, an authorised officer must take all reasonable steps to ensure the officer causes as little inconvenience, and does as little damage, as is practicable in the circumstances.\n(sec.95-ssec.11) This section does not limit any power an authorised officer has apart from this section.\n(sec.95-ssec.12) If an authorised officer authorises a person to take action under subsection (2) (b) — the person may exercise the powers mentioned in subsection (7) (a) ; and the officer must inform the person— of the action the person is authorised to take; and of the person’s powers under this section; and in general terms, of section 109 ; and Section 109 imposes on an authorised officer a requirement to give notice of any damage done in the exercise of a power. subsections (8) , (9) and (10) (so far as they relate to the power mentioned in subsection (7) (a) ) apply to the person as if the person were the authorised officer.\n- (a) a discharge of pollutant into coastal waters has happened, or is likely to happen; and\n- (b) urgent action is necessary to prevent or minimise the discharge and its effect on Queensland’s marine and coastal environment.\n- (a) direct any person to take stated reasonable action within a stated reasonable time; or\n- (b) take the action, or authorise someone else to take the action.\n- (a) to remove, destroy or disperse a discharged pollutant; and\n- (b) to prevent the pollutant from reaching a stated place on water or land; and\n- (c) to mitigate damage or injury caused to a stated place or thing on water or land by the pollutant; and\n- (d) to require any person— (i) to do something that assists with action mentioned in paragraph (a) , (b) or (c) ; or (ii) to stop doing something that may interfere with action mentioned in paragraph (a) , (b) or (c) .\n- (i) to do something that assists with action mentioned in paragraph (a) , (b) or (c) ; or\n- (ii) to stop doing something that may interfere with action mentioned in paragraph (a) , (b) or (c) .\n- (i) to do something that assists with action mentioned in paragraph (a) , (b) or (c) ; or\n- (ii) to stop doing something that may interfere with action mentioned in paragraph (a) , (b) or (c) .\n- (a) board any ship or, without a warrant, enter any place and take the action; and\n- (b) in taking the action, exercise any of the powers (other than investigatory powers) under this part.\n- (a) remove the person or thing from the place; and\n- (b) take all reasonable measures to ensure the person or thing does not again obstruct or prevent the action being taken.\n- (a) the person may exercise the powers mentioned in subsection (7) (a) ; and\n- (b) the officer must inform the person— (i) of the action the person is authorised to take; and (ii) of the person’s powers under this section; and (iii) in general terms, of section 109 ; and Note— Section 109 imposes on an authorised officer a requirement to give notice of any damage done in the exercise of a power.\n- (i) of the action the person is authorised to take; and\n- (ii) of the person’s powers under this section; and\n- (iii) in general terms, of section 109 ; and Note— Section 109 imposes on an authorised officer a requirement to give notice of any damage done in the exercise of a power.\n- (c) subsections (8) , (9) and (10) (so far as they relate to the power mentioned in subsection (7) (a) ) apply to the person as if the person were the authorised officer.\n- (i) of the action the person is authorised to take; and\n- (ii) of the person’s powers under this section; and\n- (iii) in general terms, of section 109 ; and Note— Section 109 imposes on an authorised officer a requirement to give notice of any damage done in the exercise of a power.","sortOrder":167},{"sectionNumber":"sec.96","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authorised officer may direct emergency release of pollutant","content":"### sec.96 Authorised officer may direct emergency release of pollutant\n\nAn authorised officer may give a written direction to a person to release a pollutant into coastal waters if the officer is satisfied—\nit is necessary and reasonable to release the pollutant because of an emergency; and\nthere is no other practicable alternative to the release.\nThe authorised officer may impose reasonable conditions on the direction.\nA person to whom a direction is given must—\ncomply with the direction, unless the person has a reasonable excuse; and\ntake all reasonable and practicable precautions to prevent or minimise—\nharm being caused to Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and\nloss or damage to property.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nA person to whom a direction is given does not contravene this Act merely because the person complies with the direction.\n(sec.96-ssec.1) An authorised officer may give a written direction to a person to release a pollutant into coastal waters if the officer is satisfied— it is necessary and reasonable to release the pollutant because of an emergency; and there is no other practicable alternative to the release.\n(sec.96-ssec.2) The authorised officer may impose reasonable conditions on the direction.\n(sec.96-ssec.3) A person to whom a direction is given must— comply with the direction, unless the person has a reasonable excuse; and take all reasonable and practicable precautions to prevent or minimise— harm being caused to Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and loss or damage to property. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.96-ssec.4) A person to whom a direction is given does not contravene this Act merely because the person complies with the direction.\n- (a) it is necessary and reasonable to release the pollutant because of an emergency; and\n- (b) there is no other practicable alternative to the release.\n- (a) comply with the direction, unless the person has a reasonable excuse; and\n- (b) take all reasonable and practicable precautions to prevent or minimise— (i) harm being caused to Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and (ii) loss or damage to property.\n- (i) harm being caused to Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and\n- (ii) loss or damage to property.\n- (i) harm being caused to Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and\n- (ii) loss or damage to property.","sortOrder":168},{"sectionNumber":"pt.12-div.7","sectionType":"division","heading":"Power of intervention","content":"## Power of intervention","sortOrder":169},{"sectionNumber":"sec.97","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for division","content":"### sec.97 Definitions for division\n\nIn this division—\nAustralian Maritime Safety Authority ...\ns 97 def Australian Maritime Safety Authority om 2010 No. 13 s 92\ncargo includes ballast and ship’s stores and fuel.\nIntervention Convention means the International Convention Relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution Casualties.\nmaritime casualty means a collision of ships, stranding or other incident of navigation, or other happening on board a ship or external to it resulting in material damage or imminent threat of material damage to a ship or cargo.","sortOrder":170},{"sectionNumber":"sec.98","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power of intervention","content":"### sec.98 Power of intervention\n\nThis section applies if the general manager is satisfied, following a maritime casualty or acts related to a maritime casualty, that there is a potentially serious danger to the Queensland coastline, or to related Queensland interests, from the discharge or threat of discharge of pollutant into coastal waters that may reasonably be expected to result in major harmful consequences.\nWithout limiting subsection (1) , the general manager may take measures the general manager considers necessary to prevent, minimise or eliminate the danger, including, for example—\ntaking action, whether or not directions have been issued under paragraph (b) in relation to the ship—\nto move the ship or part of the ship to another place; or\nto remove cargo from the ship; or\nto salvage the ship, part of the ship or any of the ship’s cargo; or\nto sink or destroy the ship or part of the ship; or\nto take over control of the ship or part of the ship; and\nissuing directions of the kind authorised by section 99 to—\nthe ship’s owner; or\nthe ship’s master; or\nany salvor in possession of the ship.\nThe general manager must not exercise the general manager’s powers under subsection (2) (a) (iv) without the Minister’s written approval.\nThis section does not authorise the taking of measures against a warship or other ship owned or operated by a foreign country and used, for the time being, only on government non-commercial service.\nThe Minister and the general manager must, in and in relation to the exercise of a power under this section—\nact in accordance with section 100 ; and\nhave regard to—\nthe extent and probability of serious damage if the power is not exercised; and\nthe likelihood of the exercise of the power being effective; and\nthe extent of the damage likely to be caused by the exercise of the power.\nThis section does not limit any other right or power the State has apart from this section.\ns 98 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2005 No. 49 s 40\n(sec.98-ssec.1) This section applies if the general manager is satisfied, following a maritime casualty or acts related to a maritime casualty, that there is a potentially serious danger to the Queensland coastline, or to related Queensland interests, from the discharge or threat of discharge of pollutant into coastal waters that may reasonably be expected to result in major harmful consequences.\n(sec.98-ssec.2) Without limiting subsection (1) , the general manager may take measures the general manager considers necessary to prevent, minimise or eliminate the danger, including, for example— taking action, whether or not directions have been issued under paragraph (b) in relation to the ship— to move the ship or part of the ship to another place; or to remove cargo from the ship; or to salvage the ship, part of the ship or any of the ship’s cargo; or to sink or destroy the ship or part of the ship; or to take over control of the ship or part of the ship; and issuing directions of the kind authorised by section 99 to— the ship’s owner; or the ship’s master; or any salvor in possession of the ship.\n(sec.98-ssec.3) The general manager must not exercise the general manager’s powers under subsection (2) (a) (iv) without the Minister’s written approval.\n(sec.98-ssec.4) This section does not authorise the taking of measures against a warship or other ship owned or operated by a foreign country and used, for the time being, only on government non-commercial service.\n(sec.98-ssec.5) The Minister and the general manager must, in and in relation to the exercise of a power under this section— act in accordance with section 100 ; and have regard to— the extent and probability of serious damage if the power is not exercised; and the likelihood of the exercise of the power being effective; and the extent of the damage likely to be caused by the exercise of the power.\n(sec.98-ssec.6) This section does not limit any other right or power the State has apart from this section.\n- (a) taking action, whether or not directions have been issued under paragraph (b) in relation to the ship— (i) to move the ship or part of the ship to another place; or (ii) to remove cargo from the ship; or (iii) to salvage the ship, part of the ship or any of the ship’s cargo; or (iv) to sink or destroy the ship or part of the ship; or (v) to take over control of the ship or part of the ship; and\n- (i) to move the ship or part of the ship to another place; or\n- (ii) to remove cargo from the ship; or\n- (iii) to salvage the ship, part of the ship or any of the ship’s cargo; or\n- (iv) to sink or destroy the ship or part of the ship; or\n- (v) to take over control of the ship or part of the ship; and\n- (b) issuing directions of the kind authorised by section 99 to— (i) the ship’s owner; or (ii) the ship’s master; or (iii) any salvor in possession of the ship.\n- (i) the ship’s owner; or\n- (ii) the ship’s master; or\n- (iii) any salvor in possession of the ship.\n- (i) to move the ship or part of the ship to another place; or\n- (ii) to remove cargo from the ship; or\n- (iii) to salvage the ship, part of the ship or any of the ship’s cargo; or\n- (iv) to sink or destroy the ship or part of the ship; or\n- (v) to take over control of the ship or part of the ship; and\n- (i) the ship’s owner; or\n- (ii) the ship’s master; or\n- (iii) any salvor in possession of the ship.\n- (a) act in accordance with section 100 ; and\n- (b) have regard to— (i) the extent and probability of serious damage if the power is not exercised; and (ii) the likelihood of the exercise of the power being effective; and (iii) the extent of the damage likely to be caused by the exercise of the power.\n- (i) the extent and probability of serious damage if the power is not exercised; and\n- (ii) the likelihood of the exercise of the power being effective; and\n- (iii) the extent of the damage likely to be caused by the exercise of the power.\n- (i) the extent and probability of serious damage if the power is not exercised; and\n- (ii) the likelihood of the exercise of the power being effective; and\n- (iii) the extent of the damage likely to be caused by the exercise of the power.","sortOrder":171},{"sectionNumber":"sec.99","sectionType":"section","heading":"Directions under s 98 may require taking of action","content":"### sec.99 Directions under s 98 may require taking of action\n\nA direction under section 98 issued in relation to a ship may require the doing, or prohibit the doing, of anything in relation to the ship, including, for example—\nthe movement of the ship or part of the ship; and\nthe removal of cargo from the ship; and\nthe taking of salvage measures in relation to the ship, part of the ship or any of the ship’s cargo; and\nthe sinking or destruction of the ship or part of the ship; and\nthe sinking, destruction or discharging into the sea of any of the ship’s cargo; and\nthe handing over of control of the ship or part of the ship.\nThe general manager must not issue a direction under subsection (1) (d) without the Minister’s written approval.\nWithout limiting subsection (1) , a direction may—\nrequire that anything be done in accordance with the direction, with the approval, or in accordance with the instructions, of a stated person; or\nprohibit the doing of anything other than in accordance with the direction, with the approval, or in accordance with the instructions, of a stated person.\ns 99 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1\n(sec.99-ssec.1) A direction under section 98 issued in relation to a ship may require the doing, or prohibit the doing, of anything in relation to the ship, including, for example— the movement of the ship or part of the ship; and the removal of cargo from the ship; and the taking of salvage measures in relation to the ship, part of the ship or any of the ship’s cargo; and the sinking or destruction of the ship or part of the ship; and the sinking, destruction or discharging into the sea of any of the ship’s cargo; and the handing over of control of the ship or part of the ship.\n(sec.99-ssec.2) The general manager must not issue a direction under subsection (1) (d) without the Minister’s written approval.\n(sec.99-ssec.3) Without limiting subsection (1) , a direction may— require that anything be done in accordance with the direction, with the approval, or in accordance with the instructions, of a stated person; or prohibit the doing of anything other than in accordance with the direction, with the approval, or in accordance with the instructions, of a stated person.\n- (a) the movement of the ship or part of the ship; and\n- (b) the removal of cargo from the ship; and\n- (c) the taking of salvage measures in relation to the ship, part of the ship or any of the ship’s cargo; and\n- (d) the sinking or destruction of the ship or part of the ship; and\n- (e) the sinking, destruction or discharging into the sea of any of the ship’s cargo; and\n- (f) the handing over of control of the ship or part of the ship.\n- (a) require that anything be done in accordance with the direction, with the approval, or in accordance with the instructions, of a stated person; or\n- (b) prohibit the doing of anything other than in accordance with the direction, with the approval, or in accordance with the instructions, of a stated person.","sortOrder":172},{"sectionNumber":"sec.100","sectionType":"section","heading":"Things to be done before power to intervene is exercised","content":"### sec.100 Things to be done before power to intervene is exercised\n\nBefore exercising the power of intervention under section 98 , the general manager must—\nto the greatest extent practicable, ensure the exercise of the power will not involve a threat to human life; and\nhave regard to Australia’s obligations under the Intervention Convention; and\nconsult with the Australian Maritime Safety Authority; and\nconsult with the relevant ship’s owner.\nSubsection (1) (b) , (c) and (d) does not apply if, in the general manager’s opinion, power to intervene must be exercised urgently.\ns 100 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1\n(sec.100-ssec.1) Before exercising the power of intervention under section 98 , the general manager must— to the greatest extent practicable, ensure the exercise of the power will not involve a threat to human life; and have regard to Australia’s obligations under the Intervention Convention; and consult with the Australian Maritime Safety Authority; and consult with the relevant ship’s owner.\n(sec.100-ssec.2) Subsection (1) (b) , (c) and (d) does not apply if, in the general manager’s opinion, power to intervene must be exercised urgently.\n- (a) to the greatest extent practicable, ensure the exercise of the power will not involve a threat to human life; and\n- (b) have regard to Australia’s obligations under the Intervention Convention; and\n- (c) consult with the Australian Maritime Safety Authority; and\n- (d) consult with the relevant ship’s owner.","sortOrder":173},{"sectionNumber":"pt.12-div.8","sectionType":"division","heading":"Offences","content":"## Offences","sortOrder":174},{"sectionNumber":"sec.101","sectionType":"section","heading":"Failure to help authorised officer—emergency","content":"### sec.101 Failure to help authorised officer—emergency\n\nThis section applies if—\nan authorised officer is taking action under section 95 ; and\nthe officer requires a person to give reasonable help to the officer under section 81 (1) (h) for the exercise of a power.\nThe person must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse for not complying with it.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\nIf the help required is the answering of a question or producing of a document (other than a document required to be held, kept or produced by the person under this Act), it is not a reasonable excuse for the person to fail to answer the question, or produce the document, on the ground that complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person.\nWhen making a requirement mentioned in subsection (3) , the authorised officer must inform the person of the following—\nthe person is obliged to answer the question or produce the document despite the rule of law about privilege against self-incrimination;\nthe person may answer the question or produce the document subject to the objection that complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person;\nif the person makes the objection—the answer or producing of the document may not be admitted in evidence against the person in a prosecution for an offence against this Act, other than an offence (constituted by the giving of the answer or producing of the document) against section 105 or 106 .\nIf, before giving the answer or producing the document, the person makes the objection, the answer or producing of the document is not admissible in evidence against the person in a prosecution for an offence against this Act, other than an offence (constituted by the giving of the answer or producing of the document) against section 105 or 106 .\n(sec.101-ssec.1) This section applies if— an authorised officer is taking action under section 95 ; and the officer requires a person to give reasonable help to the officer under section 81 (1) (h) for the exercise of a power.\n(sec.101-ssec.2) The person must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse for not complying with it. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n(sec.101-ssec.3) If the help required is the answering of a question or producing of a document (other than a document required to be held, kept or produced by the person under this Act), it is not a reasonable excuse for the person to fail to answer the question, or produce the document, on the ground that complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person.\n(sec.101-ssec.4) When making a requirement mentioned in subsection (3) , the authorised officer must inform the person of the following— the person is obliged to answer the question or produce the document despite the rule of law about privilege against self-incrimination; the person may answer the question or produce the document subject to the objection that complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person; if the person makes the objection—the answer or producing of the document may not be admitted in evidence against the person in a prosecution for an offence against this Act, other than an offence (constituted by the giving of the answer or producing of the document) against section 105 or 106 .\n(sec.101-ssec.5) If, before giving the answer or producing the document, the person makes the objection, the answer or producing of the document is not admissible in evidence against the person in a prosecution for an offence against this Act, other than an offence (constituted by the giving of the answer or producing of the document) against section 105 or 106 .\n- (a) an authorised officer is taking action under section 95 ; and\n- (b) the officer requires a person to give reasonable help to the officer under section 81 (1) (h) for the exercise of a power.\n- (a) the person is obliged to answer the question or produce the document despite the rule of law about privilege against self-incrimination;\n- (b) the person may answer the question or produce the document subject to the objection that complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person;\n- (c) if the person makes the objection—the answer or producing of the document may not be admitted in evidence against the person in a prosecution for an offence against this Act, other than an offence (constituted by the giving of the answer or producing of the document) against section 105 or 106 .","sortOrder":175},{"sectionNumber":"sec.102","sectionType":"section","heading":"Failure to help authorised officer—other cases","content":"### sec.102 Failure to help authorised officer—other cases\n\nThis section applies if—\nan authorised officer requires a person under section 81 (1) (h) to give reasonable help to the officer in relation to the exercise of a power; and\nsection 103 does not apply.\nThe person must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nIf the help required is the answering of a question or producing of a document (other than a document required to be held, kept or produced by the person under this Act), it is a reasonable excuse for the person to fail to answer the question, or produce the document, if complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person.\n(sec.102-ssec.1) This section applies if— an authorised officer requires a person under section 81 (1) (h) to give reasonable help to the officer in relation to the exercise of a power; and section 103 does not apply.\n(sec.102-ssec.2) The person must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.102-ssec.3) If the help required is the answering of a question or producing of a document (other than a document required to be held, kept or produced by the person under this Act), it is a reasonable excuse for the person to fail to answer the question, or produce the document, if complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person.\n- (a) an authorised officer requires a person under section 81 (1) (h) to give reasonable help to the officer in relation to the exercise of a power; and\n- (b) section 103 does not apply.","sortOrder":176},{"sectionNumber":"sec.103","sectionType":"section","heading":"Failure to obey direction","content":"### sec.103 Failure to obey direction\n\nThis section applies if—\nan authorised officer requires a person to do something under section 81 (1) (i) ; and\nsection 101 does not apply.\nThe person must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.103-ssec.1) This section applies if— an authorised officer requires a person to do something under section 81 (1) (i) ; and section 101 does not apply.\n(sec.103-ssec.2) The person must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n- (a) an authorised officer requires a person to do something under section 81 (1) (i) ; and\n- (b) section 101 does not apply.","sortOrder":177},{"sectionNumber":"sec.104","sectionType":"section","heading":"Failure to give information","content":"### sec.104 Failure to give information\n\nThis section applies if—\nan authorised officer requires a person to give information, including, for example, by answering a question under section 88 (2) ; and\nsection 101 does not apply.\nThe person must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nIf the person is an individual, it is a reasonable excuse for the person not to comply with the requirement if complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person.\nIf the person is a corporation, it is not a reasonable excuse for the person not to comply with the requirement if complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person.\nIf information is given under section 88 (2) by a person who is a corporation, the information is not admissible in evidence against a representative of the person in a civil or criminal proceeding other than a proceeding against the representative—\nfor an offence against this section; or\nin relation to the falsity of the information.\nThe person does not commit an offence against this section if the information sought by the authorised officer—\nis not in fact relevant to an offence that happened; or\nis about a suspected offence that did not happen.\ns 104 amd 2010 No. 19 s 231\n(sec.104-ssec.1) This section applies if— an authorised officer requires a person to give information, including, for example, by answering a question under section 88 (2) ; and section 101 does not apply.\n(sec.104-ssec.2) The person must comply with the requirement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.104-ssec.3) If the person is an individual, it is a reasonable excuse for the person not to comply with the requirement if complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person.\n(sec.104-ssec.4) If the person is a corporation, it is not a reasonable excuse for the person not to comply with the requirement if complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person.\n(sec.104-ssec.5) If information is given under section 88 (2) by a person who is a corporation, the information is not admissible in evidence against a representative of the person in a civil or criminal proceeding other than a proceeding against the representative— for an offence against this section; or in relation to the falsity of the information.\n(sec.104-ssec.6) The person does not commit an offence against this section if the information sought by the authorised officer— is not in fact relevant to an offence that happened; or is about a suspected offence that did not happen.\n- (a) an authorised officer requires a person to give information, including, for example, by answering a question under section 88 (2) ; and\n- (b) section 101 does not apply.\n- (a) for an offence against this section; or\n- (b) in relation to the falsity of the information.\n- (a) is not in fact relevant to an offence that happened; or\n- (b) is about a suspected offence that did not happen.","sortOrder":178},{"sectionNumber":"sec.105","sectionType":"section","heading":"False or misleading statements","content":"### sec.105 False or misleading statements\n\nA person must not state anything to an authorised officer that the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\ns 105 sub 2006 No. 21 s 26","sortOrder":179},{"sectionNumber":"sec.106","sectionType":"section","heading":"False or misleading documents","content":"### sec.106 False or misleading documents\n\nA person must not give an authorised officer a document containing information the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\nSubsection (1) does not apply to a person if the person, when giving the document—\ninforms the authorised officer, to the best of the person’s ability, how it is false or misleading; and\nif the person has, or can reasonably obtain, the correct information, gives the correct information.\ns 106 sub 2006 No. 21 s 26\n(sec.106-ssec.1) A person must not give an authorised officer a document containing information the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n(sec.106-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a person if the person, when giving the document— informs the authorised officer, to the best of the person’s ability, how it is false or misleading; and if the person has, or can reasonably obtain, the correct information, gives the correct information.\n- (a) informs the authorised officer, to the best of the person’s ability, how it is false or misleading; and\n- (b) if the person has, or can reasonably obtain, the correct information, gives the correct information.","sortOrder":180},{"sectionNumber":"sec.107","sectionType":"section","heading":"Obstruction of authorised persons","content":"### sec.107 Obstruction of authorised persons\n\nIn this section—\nauthorised person means—\nan authorised officer; or\na person who is authorised by an authorised officer under section 95 (2) (b) to take action.\nA person must not obstruct an authorised person in the exercise of a power under this Act, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n(sec.107-ssec.1) In this section— authorised person means— an authorised officer; or a person who is authorised by an authorised officer under section 95 (2) (b) to take action.\n(sec.107-ssec.2) A person must not obstruct an authorised person in the exercise of a power under this Act, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—350 penalty units.\n- (a) an authorised officer; or\n- (b) a person who is authorised by an authorised officer under section 95 (2) (b) to take action.","sortOrder":181},{"sectionNumber":"sec.108","sectionType":"section","heading":"Impersonation of authorised officer","content":"### sec.108 Impersonation of authorised officer\n\nA person must not pretend to be an authorised officer.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.","sortOrder":182},{"sectionNumber":"pt.12-div.9","sectionType":"division","heading":"General","content":"## General","sortOrder":183},{"sectionNumber":"sec.109","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authorised officer to give notice of damage","content":"### sec.109 Authorised officer to give notice of damage\n\nThis section applies if—\nan authorised officer damages anything in the exercise of a power under this Act; or\na person who is authorised by an authorised officer to take action under this Act damages anything in taking the action.\nSee section 95 (2) (b) .\nThe authorised officer must promptly give written notice of the particulars of the damage.\nThe notice must be given—\nif the thing is a ship or is on a ship—to the ship’s master; or\notherwise—to the person who appears to the authorised officer to be the thing’s owner.\nIf the authorised officer believes the damage was caused by a latent defect in the thing or other circumstances beyond the officer’s control, the officer may state this in the notice.\nIf, for any reason, it is not practicable to comply with subsection (3) , the authorised officer must—\nleave the notice at the place where the damage happened; and\nensure the notice is left in a reasonably secured way in a conspicuous position.\nThis section does not apply to damage the authorised officer believes, on reasonable grounds, is trivial.\ns 109 amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.109-ssec.1) This section applies if— an authorised officer damages anything in the exercise of a power under this Act; or a person who is authorised by an authorised officer to take action under this Act damages anything in taking the action. See section 95 (2) (b) .\n(sec.109-ssec.2) The authorised officer must promptly give written notice of the particulars of the damage.\n(sec.109-ssec.3) The notice must be given— if the thing is a ship or is on a ship—to the ship’s master; or otherwise—to the person who appears to the authorised officer to be the thing’s owner.\n(sec.109-ssec.4) If the authorised officer believes the damage was caused by a latent defect in the thing or other circumstances beyond the officer’s control, the officer may state this in the notice.\n(sec.109-ssec.5) If, for any reason, it is not practicable to comply with subsection (3) , the authorised officer must— leave the notice at the place where the damage happened; and ensure the notice is left in a reasonably secured way in a conspicuous position.\n(sec.109-ssec.6) This section does not apply to damage the authorised officer believes, on reasonable grounds, is trivial.\n- (a) an authorised officer damages anything in the exercise of a power under this Act; or\n- (b) a person who is authorised by an authorised officer to take action under this Act damages anything in taking the action. Note— See section 95 (2) (b) .\n- (a) if the thing is a ship or is on a ship—to the ship’s master; or\n- (b) otherwise—to the person who appears to the authorised officer to be the thing’s owner.\n- (a) leave the notice at the place where the damage happened; and\n- (b) ensure the notice is left in a reasonably secured way in a conspicuous position.","sortOrder":184},{"sectionNumber":"sec.110","sectionType":"section","heading":"Compensation","content":"### sec.110 Compensation\n\nA person may claim compensation from the State if the person incurs loss or expense because of the exercise or purported exercise of a power under this part, including, for example, in complying with a requirement made of the person under this part.\nPayment of compensation from the State may be claimed and ordered—\nin a proceeding brought in a court with jurisdiction for the recovery of compensation; or\nin a proceeding for an offence against this Act brought against the person making the claim for compensation.\nA court may order the payment of compensation for the loss or expense only if it is satisfied it is just to make the order in the circumstances of the particular case.\nA regulation may prescribe matters that may, or must, be taken into account by the court when considering whether it is just to make the order.\ns 110 amd 2006 No. 21 s 27\n(sec.110-ssec.1) A person may claim compensation from the State if the person incurs loss or expense because of the exercise or purported exercise of a power under this part, including, for example, in complying with a requirement made of the person under this part.\n(sec.110-ssec.2) Payment of compensation from the State may be claimed and ordered— in a proceeding brought in a court with jurisdiction for the recovery of compensation; or in a proceeding for an offence against this Act brought against the person making the claim for compensation.\n(sec.110-ssec.3) A court may order the payment of compensation for the loss or expense only if it is satisfied it is just to make the order in the circumstances of the particular case.\n(sec.110-ssec.4) A regulation may prescribe matters that may, or must, be taken into account by the court when considering whether it is just to make the order.\n- (a) in a proceeding brought in a court with jurisdiction for the recovery of compensation; or\n- (b) in a proceeding for an offence against this Act brought against the person making the claim for compensation.","sortOrder":185},{"sectionNumber":"pt.13","sectionType":"part","heading":"Discharge expenses","content":"# Discharge expenses","sortOrder":186},{"sectionNumber":"sec.111","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for part","content":"### sec.111 Definitions for part\n\nIn this part—\ndischarge expenses means—\nthe reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the State or a prescribed entity in—\ninvestigating a discharge of pollutant; and\npreventing or minimising the effects of a discharge of pollutant; and\ntaking action to prevent or minimise the effects of a likely discharge of pollutant if—\nthe State or prescribed entity reasonably believes the discharge is likely to happen and takes action to prevent or minimise its effects; and\nthe likely discharge does not happen; and\ntreating animals and plants affected by a discharge of pollutant; and\nrehabilitating or restoring Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and\nthe exercise of a power by an authorised officer or the general manager under part 12 , division 6 or 7 ; and\nan amount reasonably paid by the State under section 110 .\nA discharge expense incurred or paid by the State includes a cost or expense incurred, action taken or amount paid by the Gold Coast Waterways Authority. This includes a cost or expense incurred, action taken or an amount paid by an employee of the Gold Coast Waterways Authority who is an authorised officer under this Act. The Gold Coast Waterways Authority Act 2012 , section 9 (2) provides that the Gold Coast Waterways Authority represents the State.\ns 111 def discharge expenses amd 2000 No. 6 s 42 ; 2001 No. 79 s 59 ; 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2006 No. 21 s 28 ; 2010 No. 19 s 136 ; 2012 No. 38 s 119 ; 2019 No. 25 s 25 (1) – (2)\ndischarge offence means a discharge offence within the meaning of part 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 or 9 .\nprescribed entity means—\na port authority or a port operator; or\nan entity acting under the direction, guidance, management or supervision of the marine pollution controller performing a function under section 93A (3) .\na local government, an entity established under the law of the Commonwealth\ns 111 def prescribed entity ins 2019 No. 25 s 25 (3)\n- (a) the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the State or a prescribed entity in— (i) investigating a discharge of pollutant; and (ii) preventing or minimising the effects of a discharge of pollutant; and (iii) taking action to prevent or minimise the effects of a likely discharge of pollutant if— (A) the State or prescribed entity reasonably believes the discharge is likely to happen and takes action to prevent or minimise its effects; and (B) the likely discharge does not happen; and (iv) treating animals and plants affected by a discharge of pollutant; and (v) rehabilitating or restoring Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and (vi) the exercise of a power by an authorised officer or the general manager under part 12 , division 6 or 7 ; and\n- (i) investigating a discharge of pollutant; and\n- (ii) preventing or minimising the effects of a discharge of pollutant; and\n- (iii) taking action to prevent or minimise the effects of a likely discharge of pollutant if— (A) the State or prescribed entity reasonably believes the discharge is likely to happen and takes action to prevent or minimise its effects; and (B) the likely discharge does not happen; and\n- (A) the State or prescribed entity reasonably believes the discharge is likely to happen and takes action to prevent or minimise its effects; and\n- (B) the likely discharge does not happen; and\n- (iv) treating animals and plants affected by a discharge of pollutant; and\n- (v) rehabilitating or restoring Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and\n- (vi) the exercise of a power by an authorised officer or the general manager under part 12 , division 6 or 7 ; and\n- (b) an amount reasonably paid by the State under section 110 .\n- (i) investigating a discharge of pollutant; and\n- (ii) preventing or minimising the effects of a discharge of pollutant; and\n- (iii) taking action to prevent or minimise the effects of a likely discharge of pollutant if— (A) the State or prescribed entity reasonably believes the discharge is likely to happen and takes action to prevent or minimise its effects; and (B) the likely discharge does not happen; and\n- (A) the State or prescribed entity reasonably believes the discharge is likely to happen and takes action to prevent or minimise its effects; and\n- (B) the likely discharge does not happen; and\n- (iv) treating animals and plants affected by a discharge of pollutant; and\n- (v) rehabilitating or restoring Queensland’s marine and coastal environment; and\n- (vi) the exercise of a power by an authorised officer or the general manager under part 12 , division 6 or 7 ; and\n- (A) the State or prescribed entity reasonably believes the discharge is likely to happen and takes action to prevent or minimise its effects; and\n- (B) the likely discharge does not happen; and\n- (a) a port authority or a port operator; or\n- (b) an entity acting under the direction, guidance, management or supervision of the marine pollution controller performing a function under section 93A (3) . Examples of entities for paragraph (b) — a local government, an entity established under the law of the Commonwealth","sortOrder":187},{"sectionNumber":"sec.112","sectionType":"section","heading":"General manager to set amounts for costs and expenses relating to definition discharge expenses","content":"### sec.112 General manager to set amounts for costs and expenses relating to definition discharge expenses\n\nThe general manager may, by gazette notice, set an amount for the services of a person, or the use or provision of ships or equipment, for a section 111 activity.\nDespite subsection (1) , if the State contracts for the services of a person, or contracts or hires the use or provision of ships or equipment, for a section 111 activity, the actual cost for the contract or hiring is the amount to be used for the definition discharge expenses .\nA claim by the State for discharge expenses based on the amounts as gazetted or incurred for a matter as mentioned in this section is, in the absence of contrary evidence, taken to be the State’s reasonable costs and expenses in relation to the matter for the purposes of the definition discharge expenses.\nThe State’s discharge expenses may include other matters not mentioned in a gazette notice under subsection (1) .\nIn this section—\nsection 111 activity means an activity mentioned in the definition discharge expenses , paragraph (a) .\ns 112 prev s 112 om 2001 No. 79 s 60\npres s 112 ins 2006 No. 21 s 29\n(sec.112-ssec.1) The general manager may, by gazette notice, set an amount for the services of a person, or the use or provision of ships or equipment, for a section 111 activity.\n(sec.112-ssec.2) Despite subsection (1) , if the State contracts for the services of a person, or contracts or hires the use or provision of ships or equipment, for a section 111 activity, the actual cost for the contract or hiring is the amount to be used for the definition discharge expenses .\n(sec.112-ssec.3) A claim by the State for discharge expenses based on the amounts as gazetted or incurred for a matter as mentioned in this section is, in the absence of contrary evidence, taken to be the State’s reasonable costs and expenses in relation to the matter for the purposes of the definition discharge expenses.\n(sec.112-ssec.4) The State’s discharge expenses may include other matters not mentioned in a gazette notice under subsection (1) .\n(sec.112-ssec.5) In this section— section 111 activity means an activity mentioned in the definition discharge expenses , paragraph (a) .","sortOrder":188},{"sectionNumber":"sec.113","sectionType":"section","heading":"Detained ship must be released on giving security","content":"### sec.113 Detained ship must be released on giving security\n\nThe chief executive must release a ship detained under this Act if a security is given under this section.\nThe amount of the security must be enough, in the chief executive’s opinion, to cover—\nthe State’s discharge expenses in relation to the ship and, if the chief executive makes an election under subsection (3) , the prescribed entity’s discharge expenses; and\nthe penalty likely to be payable if a successful prosecution for the discharge offence were to be taken; and\ninterest on the discharge expenses.\nThe chief executive may elect to secure a prescribed entity’s discharge expenses if the prescribed entity asks.\nThe security may be provided in any 1 or more of the following forms, or in another form, the chief executive considers appropriate—\na bank guarantee;\na bond;\nan insurance policy;\na letter of undertaking.\nThe chief executive must make a decision about the amount and form of security within a reasonable time.\ns 113 amd 2001 No. 79 s 61 ; 2010 No. 19 ss 137 , 232 ; 2019 No. 25 s 26\n(sec.113-ssec.1) The chief executive must release a ship detained under this Act if a security is given under this section.\n(sec.113-ssec.2) The amount of the security must be enough, in the chief executive’s opinion, to cover— the State’s discharge expenses in relation to the ship and, if the chief executive makes an election under subsection (3) , the prescribed entity’s discharge expenses; and the penalty likely to be payable if a successful prosecution for the discharge offence were to be taken; and interest on the discharge expenses.\n(sec.113-ssec.3) The chief executive may elect to secure a prescribed entity’s discharge expenses if the prescribed entity asks.\n(sec.113-ssec.4) The security may be provided in any 1 or more of the following forms, or in another form, the chief executive considers appropriate— a bank guarantee; a bond; an insurance policy; a letter of undertaking.\n(sec.113-ssec.5) The chief executive must make a decision about the amount and form of security within a reasonable time.\n- (a) the State’s discharge expenses in relation to the ship and, if the chief executive makes an election under subsection (3) , the prescribed entity’s discharge expenses; and\n- (b) the penalty likely to be payable if a successful prosecution for the discharge offence were to be taken; and\n- (c) interest on the discharge expenses.\n- (a) a bank guarantee;\n- (b) a bond;\n- (c) an insurance policy;\n- (d) a letter of undertaking.","sortOrder":189},{"sectionNumber":"sec.114","sectionType":"section","heading":"Other ways detained ship may be released","content":"### sec.114 Other ways detained ship may be released\n\nA ship detained under this Act must also be released if—\na proceeding is started for a discharge offence involving the ship and the proceeding is discontinued; or\na proceeding started for a discharge offence involving the ship is concluded, whether or not an appeal is pending, without anyone being convicted or discharge expenses being awarded against anyone; or\na proceeding for a discharge offence involving the ship is concluded and all discharge expenses ordered to be paid and all penalties imposed have been paid; or\nthe chief executive has sought to recover discharge expenses as a debt and the amount of the expenses has been paid; or\nthe chief executive decides for any other reason the ship should be released.\ns 114 amd 2001 No. 79 s 62\n- (a) a proceeding is started for a discharge offence involving the ship and the proceeding is discontinued; or\n- (b) a proceeding started for a discharge offence involving the ship is concluded, whether or not an appeal is pending, without anyone being convicted or discharge expenses being awarded against anyone; or\n- (c) a proceeding for a discharge offence involving the ship is concluded and all discharge expenses ordered to be paid and all penalties imposed have been paid; or\n- (d) the chief executive has sought to recover discharge expenses as a debt and the amount of the expenses has been paid; or\n- (e) the chief executive decides for any other reason the ship should be released.","sortOrder":190},{"sectionNumber":"sec.115","sectionType":"section","heading":"Recovery of discharge expenses","content":"### sec.115 Recovery of discharge expenses\n\nThis section applies if the State or a prescribed entity incurs discharge expenses in relation to a discharge or likely discharge of pollutant from a ship into coastal waters.\nHowever, this section applies in relation to discharge expenses incurred by a prescribed entity only if the chief executive makes an election under section 113 (3) for the discharge expenses.\nThe discharge expenses are taken to be a debt payable to the State jointly and severally by the owner and the master of the ship from which the pollutant was discharged or was likely to be discharged.\nThe general manager may recover the discharge expenses by making a demand against the security or part of it.\nBefore making the demand against the security, the general manager must give to the security giver a written notice under this section.\nThe notice must—\noutline the action taken; and\nstate the amount to be demanded against the security; and\ninvite the person to make written representations to the general manager to show, within a stated time of at least 30 days, why the demand should not be made.\nIf, after considering all written representations made within the stated time, the general manager decides grounds still exist to make the demand for the amount or a lesser amount, the general manager must immediately give a QCAT information notice for the decision to the security giver.\nThe QCAT information notice must enclose a copy of section 116 .\nIf a QCAT information notice is given under subsection (7) , the general manager must not make the demand until—\nthe time to apply, as provided under the QCAT Act , to QCAT for a review of the decision has ended; and\nif an application for a review of the decision is made—the application is finally decided.\nIf the general manager makes the demand, the security provider—\nis not required to inquire into the correctness or lawfulness of the general manager’s demand; and\nmust pay the security or the part of it demanded to the general manager.\nAn amount recovered for a prescribed entity by the general manager must be reimbursed to the prescribed entity.\nIn this section—\nsecurity giver means the ship’s owner or other person who arranged for the security to be given.\nsecurity provider means the person providing the security.\ns 115 amd 2000 No. 6 s 43 ; 2001 No. 79 s 63 ; 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2006 No. 21 s 30 ; 2009 No. 24 s 1748 ; 2010 No. 19 s 138 ; 2019 No. 25 s 27\n(sec.115-ssec.1) This section applies if the State or a prescribed entity incurs discharge expenses in relation to a discharge or likely discharge of pollutant from a ship into coastal waters.\n(sec.115-ssec.2) However, this section applies in relation to discharge expenses incurred by a prescribed entity only if the chief executive makes an election under section 113 (3) for the discharge expenses.\n(sec.115-ssec.3) The discharge expenses are taken to be a debt payable to the State jointly and severally by the owner and the master of the ship from which the pollutant was discharged or was likely to be discharged.\n(sec.115-ssec.4) The general manager may recover the discharge expenses by making a demand against the security or part of it.\n(sec.115-ssec.5) Before making the demand against the security, the general manager must give to the security giver a written notice under this section.\n(sec.115-ssec.6) The notice must— outline the action taken; and state the amount to be demanded against the security; and invite the person to make written representations to the general manager to show, within a stated time of at least 30 days, why the demand should not be made.\n(sec.115-ssec.7) If, after considering all written representations made within the stated time, the general manager decides grounds still exist to make the demand for the amount or a lesser amount, the general manager must immediately give a QCAT information notice for the decision to the security giver.\n(sec.115-ssec.8) The QCAT information notice must enclose a copy of section 116 .\n(sec.115-ssec.9) If a QCAT information notice is given under subsection (7) , the general manager must not make the demand until— the time to apply, as provided under the QCAT Act , to QCAT for a review of the decision has ended; and if an application for a review of the decision is made—the application is finally decided.\n(sec.115-ssec.10) If the general manager makes the demand, the security provider— is not required to inquire into the correctness or lawfulness of the general manager’s demand; and must pay the security or the part of it demanded to the general manager.\n(sec.115-ssec.11) An amount recovered for a prescribed entity by the general manager must be reimbursed to the prescribed entity.\n(sec.115-ssec.12) In this section— security giver means the ship’s owner or other person who arranged for the security to be given. security provider means the person providing the security.\n- (a) outline the action taken; and\n- (b) state the amount to be demanded against the security; and\n- (c) invite the person to make written representations to the general manager to show, within a stated time of at least 30 days, why the demand should not be made.\n- (a) the time to apply, as provided under the QCAT Act , to QCAT for a review of the decision has ended; and\n- (b) if an application for a review of the decision is made—the application is finally decided.\n- (a) is not required to inquire into the correctness or lawfulness of the general manager’s demand; and\n- (b) must pay the security or the part of it demanded to the general manager.","sortOrder":191},{"sectionNumber":"sec.116","sectionType":"section","heading":"External review of decisions under s 115","content":"### sec.116 External review of decisions under s 115\n\nA person whose interests are affected by a decision under section 115 may apply, as provided under the QCAT Act , to QCAT for a review of the decision.\ns 116 amd 2004 No. 53 s 2 sch ; 2006 No. 21 s 31\nsub 2009 No. 24 s 1749","sortOrder":192},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.117\n\ns 117 om 2009 No. 24 s 1750","sortOrder":193},{"sectionNumber":"pt.13A","sectionType":"part","heading":"Securing compliance with Act","content":"# Securing compliance with Act","sortOrder":194},{"sectionNumber":"pt.13A-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Purpose","content":"## Purpose","sortOrder":195},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Purpose of pt 13A","content":"### sec.117A Purpose of pt 13A\n\nThe purpose of this part is to provide for alternative ways of ensuring compliance with this Act.\nDivision 2 provides for enforcement orders and interim enforcement orders if a person has failed to comply with any of the following—\na direction, requirement or order given to the person by the general manager or an authorised officer;\na division 3 undertaking given by the person to the general manager.\nDivision 3 provides for undertakings.\ns 117A ins 2006 No. 21 s 32\n(sec.117A-ssec.1) The purpose of this part is to provide for alternative ways of ensuring compliance with this Act.\n(sec.117A-ssec.2) Division 2 provides for enforcement orders and interim enforcement orders if a person has failed to comply with any of the following— a direction, requirement or order given to the person by the general manager or an authorised officer; a division 3 undertaking given by the person to the general manager.\n(sec.117A-ssec.3) Division 3 provides for undertakings.\n- (a) a direction, requirement or order given to the person by the general manager or an authorised officer;\n- (b) a division 3 undertaking given by the person to the general manager.","sortOrder":196},{"sectionNumber":"pt.13A-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Enforcement orders and interim enforcement orders","content":"## Enforcement orders and interim enforcement orders","sortOrder":197},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117B","sectionType":"section","heading":"Proceeding for enforcement order or interim enforcement order","content":"### sec.117B Proceeding for enforcement order or interim enforcement order\n\nA prescribed applicant may bring a proceeding in the District Court for any of the following—\nan enforcement order;\nan order cancelling or amending an enforcement order or interim enforcement order.\ns 117B ins 2006 No. 21 s 32\n- (a) an enforcement order;\n- (b) an order cancelling or amending an enforcement order or interim enforcement order.","sortOrder":198},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117C","sectionType":"section","heading":"Making enforcement order","content":"### sec.117C Making enforcement order\n\nThe District Court may make an enforcement order if the court is satisfied about any of the following—\na notice offence has been committed or, unless an enforcement order is made, will be committed;\nan intervention direction has been contravened or, unless an enforcement order is made, will be contravened;\na division 3 undertaking has been contravened or, unless an enforcement order is made, will be contravened.\nSubsection (1) applies whether or not there has been a prosecution for the notice offence.\ns 117C ins 2006 No. 21 s 32\n(sec.117C-ssec.1) The District Court may make an enforcement order if the court is satisfied about any of the following— a notice offence has been committed or, unless an enforcement order is made, will be committed; an intervention direction has been contravened or, unless an enforcement order is made, will be contravened; a division 3 undertaking has been contravened or, unless an enforcement order is made, will be contravened.\n(sec.117C-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not there has been a prosecution for the notice offence.\n- (a) a notice offence has been committed or, unless an enforcement order is made, will be committed;\n- (b) an intervention direction has been contravened or, unless an enforcement order is made, will be contravened;\n- (c) a division 3 undertaking has been contravened or, unless an enforcement order is made, will be contravened.","sortOrder":199},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117D","sectionType":"section","heading":"Making interim enforcement order","content":"### sec.117D Making interim enforcement order\n\nIf a prescribed applicant has brought a proceeding for an enforcement order but the District Court has not decided the proceeding, the court may make an interim enforcement order if it is satisfied it would be appropriate to make the interim enforcement order.\nThe District Court may make the interim enforcement order on application by the prescribed applicant or on its own initiative.\nAn interim enforcement order may be made subject to conditions.\ns 117D ins 2006 No. 21 s 32\n(sec.117D-ssec.1) If a prescribed applicant has brought a proceeding for an enforcement order but the District Court has not decided the proceeding, the court may make an interim enforcement order if it is satisfied it would be appropriate to make the interim enforcement order.\n(sec.117D-ssec.2) The District Court may make the interim enforcement order on application by the prescribed applicant or on its own initiative.\n(sec.117D-ssec.3) An interim enforcement order may be made subject to conditions.","sortOrder":200},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117E","sectionType":"section","heading":"Effect of order","content":"### sec.117E Effect of order\n\nAn enforcement order or an interim enforcement order may direct a person (the respondent ) to do 1 or more of the following—\nto stop an activity that constitutes, or will constitute, a notice offence or a contravention of an intervention direction or division 3 undertaking;\nnot to start an activity that will constitute a notice offence or a contravention of an intervention direction or division 3 undertaking;\nto do anything required to stop committing a notice offence, or a contravention of an intervention direction or division 3 undertaking, including, for example, requiring the repair, demolition or removal of a ship or a part of a ship.\nIf an enforcement order or an interim enforcement order is made as mentioned in subsection (1) , the District Court may do either or both of the following—\ndirect the respondent to give a security bond to the State for a stated period for a matter mentioned in the enforcement order or interim enforcement order;\nmake another order the court considers appropriate.\nAn enforcement order or interim enforcement order—\nmay be in terms the District Court considers appropriate to secure compliance with this Act; and\nmust state the time by which the order is to be complied with.\nA person who contravenes an enforcement order or interim enforcement order commits an offence against this Act.\nMaximum penalty—1,000 penalty units or 1 year’s imprisonment.\nThe District Court may order the forfeiture to the State of all or part of the security bond given by the respondent under subsection (2) (a) if—\na prescribed applicant applies to the court for an order for the forfeiture of all or part of the security bond; and\nthe court is satisfied that the respondent contravened the enforcement order or interim enforcement order during the period for which the security bond was given, whether or not the respondent has been prosecuted for an offence against subsection (4) .\ns 117E ins 2006 No. 21 s 32\n(sec.117E-ssec.1) An enforcement order or an interim enforcement order may direct a person (the respondent ) to do 1 or more of the following— to stop an activity that constitutes, or will constitute, a notice offence or a contravention of an intervention direction or division 3 undertaking; not to start an activity that will constitute a notice offence or a contravention of an intervention direction or division 3 undertaking; to do anything required to stop committing a notice offence, or a contravention of an intervention direction or division 3 undertaking, including, for example, requiring the repair, demolition or removal of a ship or a part of a ship.\n(sec.117E-ssec.2) If an enforcement order or an interim enforcement order is made as mentioned in subsection (1) , the District Court may do either or both of the following— direct the respondent to give a security bond to the State for a stated period for a matter mentioned in the enforcement order or interim enforcement order; make another order the court considers appropriate.\n(sec.117E-ssec.3) An enforcement order or interim enforcement order— may be in terms the District Court considers appropriate to secure compliance with this Act; and must state the time by which the order is to be complied with.\n(sec.117E-ssec.4) A person who contravenes an enforcement order or interim enforcement order commits an offence against this Act. Maximum penalty—1,000 penalty units or 1 year’s imprisonment.\n(sec.117E-ssec.5) The District Court may order the forfeiture to the State of all or part of the security bond given by the respondent under subsection (2) (a) if— a prescribed applicant applies to the court for an order for the forfeiture of all or part of the security bond; and the court is satisfied that the respondent contravened the enforcement order or interim enforcement order during the period for which the security bond was given, whether or not the respondent has been prosecuted for an offence against subsection (4) .\n- (a) to stop an activity that constitutes, or will constitute, a notice offence or a contravention of an intervention direction or division 3 undertaking;\n- (b) not to start an activity that will constitute a notice offence or a contravention of an intervention direction or division 3 undertaking;\n- (c) to do anything required to stop committing a notice offence, or a contravention of an intervention direction or division 3 undertaking, including, for example, requiring the repair, demolition or removal of a ship or a part of a ship.\n- (a) direct the respondent to give a security bond to the State for a stated period for a matter mentioned in the enforcement order or interim enforcement order;\n- (b) make another order the court considers appropriate.\n- (a) may be in terms the District Court considers appropriate to secure compliance with this Act; and\n- (b) must state the time by which the order is to be complied with.\n- (a) a prescribed applicant applies to the court for an order for the forfeiture of all or part of the security bond; and\n- (b) the court is satisfied that the respondent contravened the enforcement order or interim enforcement order during the period for which the security bond was given, whether or not the respondent has been prosecuted for an offence against subsection (4) .","sortOrder":201},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117F","sectionType":"section","heading":"Powers of District Court about enforcement order or interim enforcement order","content":"### sec.117F Powers of District Court about enforcement order or interim enforcement order\n\nThe District Court’s power to make an enforcement order or interim enforcement order to stop, or not to start, an activity may be exercised whether or not—\nit appears to the court that the person against whom the order is made intends to engage, or to continue to engage, in the activity; or\nthe person has previously engaged in an activity of the kind; or\nthere is danger of substantial damage to the Queensland marine and coastal environment if the person engages, or continues to engage, in the activity.\nThe District Court’s power to make an enforcement order or interim enforcement order to do anything may be exercised whether or not—\nit appears to the court that the person against whom the order is made intends to fail, or to continue to fail, to do the thing; or\nthe person has previously failed to do a thing of the kind; or\nthere is danger of substantial damage to the Queensland marine and coastal environment if the person fails, or continues to fail, to do the thing.\nThe District Court may cancel or amend an enforcement order or interim enforcement order.\nThe District Court’s power under this section is in addition to its other powers.\ns 117F ins 2006 No. 21 s 32\n(sec.117F-ssec.1) The District Court’s power to make an enforcement order or interim enforcement order to stop, or not to start, an activity may be exercised whether or not— it appears to the court that the person against whom the order is made intends to engage, or to continue to engage, in the activity; or the person has previously engaged in an activity of the kind; or there is danger of substantial damage to the Queensland marine and coastal environment if the person engages, or continues to engage, in the activity.\n(sec.117F-ssec.2) The District Court’s power to make an enforcement order or interim enforcement order to do anything may be exercised whether or not— it appears to the court that the person against whom the order is made intends to fail, or to continue to fail, to do the thing; or the person has previously failed to do a thing of the kind; or there is danger of substantial damage to the Queensland marine and coastal environment if the person fails, or continues to fail, to do the thing.\n(sec.117F-ssec.3) The District Court may cancel or amend an enforcement order or interim enforcement order.\n(sec.117F-ssec.4) The District Court’s power under this section is in addition to its other powers.\n- (a) it appears to the court that the person against whom the order is made intends to engage, or to continue to engage, in the activity; or\n- (b) the person has previously engaged in an activity of the kind; or\n- (c) there is danger of substantial damage to the Queensland marine and coastal environment if the person engages, or continues to engage, in the activity.\n- (a) it appears to the court that the person against whom the order is made intends to fail, or to continue to fail, to do the thing; or\n- (b) the person has previously failed to do a thing of the kind; or\n- (c) there is danger of substantial damage to the Queensland marine and coastal environment if the person fails, or continues to fail, to do the thing.","sortOrder":202},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117G","sectionType":"section","heading":"No undertaking as to damages or costs may be required","content":"### sec.117G No undertaking as to damages or costs may be required\n\nTo remove any doubt, it is declared that no undertaking as to damages or costs may be required of a prescribed applicant or the State in relation to an enforcement order or interim enforcement order.\ns 117G ins 2006 No. 21 s 32","sortOrder":203},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117GA","sectionType":"section","heading":"Further power of District Court if enforcement order is contravened","content":"### sec.117GA Further power of District Court if enforcement order is contravened\n\nIf the respondent contravenes an enforcement order, the District Court may, by further order, authorise the prescribed applicant to take the action stated in the further order.\nThe District Court’s power under this section is in addition to its other powers.\nIn this section—\nprescribed applicant means the prescribed applicant for the enforcement order.\nrespondent means the person against whom the enforcement order is made.\ns 117GA ins 2008 No. 67 s 245\n(sec.117GA-ssec.1) If the respondent contravenes an enforcement order, the District Court may, by further order, authorise the prescribed applicant to take the action stated in the further order.\n(sec.117GA-ssec.2) The District Court’s power under this section is in addition to its other powers.\n(sec.117GA-ssec.3) In this section— prescribed applicant means the prescribed applicant for the enforcement order. respondent means the person against whom the enforcement order is made.","sortOrder":204},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117GB","sectionType":"section","heading":"Recovery by State of expenses of taking authorised action","content":"### sec.117GB Recovery by State of expenses of taking authorised action\n\nThis section applies if the prescribed applicant incurs expense, whether the expense is the prescribed applicant’s expense or the State’s expense, in taking the action stated in the further order.\nThe State may recover the amount of the expense, as a debt, from the persons liable for the expense.\nIf, under subsection (2) , more than 1 person is liable for the same expense, the persons who are liable for the expense are jointly and severally liable.\ns 117GB ins 2008 No. 67 s 245\n(sec.117GB-ssec.1) This section applies if the prescribed applicant incurs expense, whether the expense is the prescribed applicant’s expense or the State’s expense, in taking the action stated in the further order.\n(sec.117GB-ssec.2) The State may recover the amount of the expense, as a debt, from the persons liable for the expense.\n(sec.117GB-ssec.3) If, under subsection (2) , more than 1 person is liable for the same expense, the persons who are liable for the expense are jointly and severally liable.","sortOrder":205},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117GC","sectionType":"section","heading":"Recovery by other persons of damages in particular circumstances","content":"### sec.117GC Recovery by other persons of damages in particular circumstances\n\nIf, in taking the action stated in the further order, the prescribed applicant attaches a ship (the first ship ) to another ship or a buoy, wharf or pile, this Act does not prevent the owner or master of the other ship, or the owner of the buoy, wharf or pile, from recovering damages for injury or loss suffered, because of the attachment, from the owner or master of the first ship.\ns 117GC ins 2008 No. 67 s 245","sortOrder":206},{"sectionNumber":"pt.13A-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Undertakings","content":"## Undertakings","sortOrder":207},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117H","sectionType":"section","heading":"General manager may seek division 3 undertaking","content":"### sec.117H General manager may seek division 3 undertaking\n\nThis section applies if the general manager believes, on reasonable grounds, that a person has contravened, will contravene or will be involved in a contravention of, this Act.\nThe general manager may, by written notice given to the person—\nstate the act or omission the general manager believes is, or will constitute, the contravention or involvement with the contravention; and\nask the person to give the general manager a written undertaking under this division (a division 3 undertaking ) that the person will not commit, continue to commit or repeat the act or omission.\ns 117H ins 2006 No. 21 s 32\n(sec.117H-ssec.1) This section applies if the general manager believes, on reasonable grounds, that a person has contravened, will contravene or will be involved in a contravention of, this Act.\n(sec.117H-ssec.2) The general manager may, by written notice given to the person— state the act or omission the general manager believes is, or will constitute, the contravention or involvement with the contravention; and ask the person to give the general manager a written undertaking under this division (a division 3 undertaking ) that the person will not commit, continue to commit or repeat the act or omission.\n- (a) state the act or omission the general manager believes is, or will constitute, the contravention or involvement with the contravention; and\n- (b) ask the person to give the general manager a written undertaking under this division (a division 3 undertaking ) that the person will not commit, continue to commit or repeat the act or omission.","sortOrder":208},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117I","sectionType":"section","heading":"Undertaking about other matter","content":"### sec.117I Undertaking about other matter\n\nWithout limiting section 117H , the general manager may accept a division 3 undertaking given by a person for this division about anything for which the chief executive, general manager or marine pollution controller has a function or power under this Act.\ns 117I ins 2006 No. 21 s 32","sortOrder":209},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117J","sectionType":"section","heading":"Variation and withdrawal of division 3 undertaking","content":"### sec.117J Variation and withdrawal of division 3 undertaking\n\nThis section applies if the general manager has accepted a division 3 undertaking given by a person.\nThe person may vary or withdraw the division 3 undertaking only if the general manager agrees to the variation or withdrawal.\nThe general manager may—\nvary the division 3 undertaking only if the person agrees to the variation; or\nwithdraw the division 3 undertaking only if the general manager reasonably believes either of the following—\nbefore the division 3 undertaking was accepted, the person contravened this Act in a way unknown to the general manager and, had the general manager known about the contravention, he or she would not have accepted the division 3 undertaking;\nthe division 3 undertaking is no longer necessary.\nIf a division 3 undertaking is varied or withdrawn under this section, the general manager must give written notice of the variation or withdrawal to the person.\nThe variation or withdrawal takes effect when written notice of the variation or withdrawal is given to the person.\ns 117J ins 2006 No. 21 s 32\n(sec.117J-ssec.1) This section applies if the general manager has accepted a division 3 undertaking given by a person.\n(sec.117J-ssec.2) The person may vary or withdraw the division 3 undertaking only if the general manager agrees to the variation or withdrawal.\n(sec.117J-ssec.3) The general manager may— vary the division 3 undertaking only if the person agrees to the variation; or withdraw the division 3 undertaking only if the general manager reasonably believes either of the following— before the division 3 undertaking was accepted, the person contravened this Act in a way unknown to the general manager and, had the general manager known about the contravention, he or she would not have accepted the division 3 undertaking; the division 3 undertaking is no longer necessary.\n(sec.117J-ssec.4) If a division 3 undertaking is varied or withdrawn under this section, the general manager must give written notice of the variation or withdrawal to the person.\n(sec.117J-ssec.5) The variation or withdrawal takes effect when written notice of the variation or withdrawal is given to the person.\n- (a) vary the division 3 undertaking only if the person agrees to the variation; or\n- (b) withdraw the division 3 undertaking only if the general manager reasonably believes either of the following— (i) before the division 3 undertaking was accepted, the person contravened this Act in a way unknown to the general manager and, had the general manager known about the contravention, he or she would not have accepted the division 3 undertaking; (ii) the division 3 undertaking is no longer necessary.\n- (i) before the division 3 undertaking was accepted, the person contravened this Act in a way unknown to the general manager and, had the general manager known about the contravention, he or she would not have accepted the division 3 undertaking;\n- (ii) the division 3 undertaking is no longer necessary.\n- (i) before the division 3 undertaking was accepted, the person contravened this Act in a way unknown to the general manager and, had the general manager known about the contravention, he or she would not have accepted the division 3 undertaking;\n- (ii) the division 3 undertaking is no longer necessary.","sortOrder":210},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117K","sectionType":"section","heading":"Enforcement of division 3 undertaking","content":"### sec.117K Enforcement of division 3 undertaking\n\nThis section applies if the general manager believes, on reasonable grounds, a person—\nhas contravened a term of a division 3 undertaking; or\nwill contravene a term of a division 3 undertaking, unless an enforcement order is made.\nThe general manager may apply to the District Court for an enforcement order under division 2 .\ns 117K ins 2006 No. 21 s 32\n(sec.117K-ssec.1) This section applies if the general manager believes, on reasonable grounds, a person— has contravened a term of a division 3 undertaking; or will contravene a term of a division 3 undertaking, unless an enforcement order is made.\n(sec.117K-ssec.2) The general manager may apply to the District Court for an enforcement order under division 2 .\n- (a) has contravened a term of a division 3 undertaking; or\n- (b) will contravene a term of a division 3 undertaking, unless an enforcement order is made.","sortOrder":211},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117L","sectionType":"section","heading":"Register of division 3 undertakings","content":"### sec.117L Register of division 3 undertakings\n\nThe general manager must, in any way the general manager considers appropriate, keep a register of each division 3 undertaking given to the general manager by a person under this division.\nAlso, the general manager must ensure the register is available for public inspection, without charge, at a place prescribed under a regulation during normal working hours.\ns 117L ins 2006 No. 21 s 32\n(sec.117L-ssec.1) The general manager must, in any way the general manager considers appropriate, keep a register of each division 3 undertaking given to the general manager by a person under this division.\n(sec.117L-ssec.2) Also, the general manager must ensure the register is available for public inspection, without charge, at a place prescribed under a regulation during normal working hours.","sortOrder":212},{"sectionNumber":"pt.13B","sectionType":"part","heading":"Review of decisions","content":"# Review of decisions","sortOrder":213},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117M","sectionType":"section","heading":"Internal review of decisions","content":"### sec.117M Internal review of decisions\n\nThis section applies if the general manager—\nrefuses an application for an approval; or\namends, suspends or cancels an approval.\nThe applicant or approval holder may ask the chief executive to review the general manager’s decision (the original decision ).\nThe applicant or approval holder is entitled to receive a statement of reasons for the original decision whether or not the provision under which the decision is made requires that the person be given a statement of reasons for the decision.\nThe Transport Planning and Coordination Act 1994 , part 5 , division 2 —\napplies to the review as if a reference in the division to the chief executive were a reference to the general manager; and\nprovides—\nfor the procedure for applying for the review and the way it is to be carried out; and\nthat the person may apply to QCAT to have the original decision stayed.\nIn this section—\napplicant , in relation to an approval, means—\nif the provision under which the approval may be applied for states that the ship’s owner may apply—the ship’s owner; or\nif the provision under which the approval may be applied for states that the ship’s master may apply—the ship’s master.\napproval means an approval or exemption that may be given by the general manager under this Act.\ns 117M ins 2009 No. 24 s 1751\namd 2019 No. 25 s 28\n(sec.117M-ssec.1) This section applies if the general manager— refuses an application for an approval; or amends, suspends or cancels an approval.\n(sec.117M-ssec.2) The applicant or approval holder may ask the chief executive to review the general manager’s decision (the original decision ).\n(sec.117M-ssec.3) The applicant or approval holder is entitled to receive a statement of reasons for the original decision whether or not the provision under which the decision is made requires that the person be given a statement of reasons for the decision.\n(sec.117M-ssec.4) The Transport Planning and Coordination Act 1994 , part 5 , division 2 — applies to the review as if a reference in the division to the chief executive were a reference to the general manager; and provides— for the procedure for applying for the review and the way it is to be carried out; and that the person may apply to QCAT to have the original decision stayed.\n(sec.117M-ssec.5) In this section— applicant , in relation to an approval, means— if the provision under which the approval may be applied for states that the ship’s owner may apply—the ship’s owner; or if the provision under which the approval may be applied for states that the ship’s master may apply—the ship’s master. approval means an approval or exemption that may be given by the general manager under this Act.\n- (a) refuses an application for an approval; or\n- (b) amends, suspends or cancels an approval.\n- (a) applies to the review as if a reference in the division to the chief executive were a reference to the general manager; and\n- (b) provides— (i) for the procedure for applying for the review and the way it is to be carried out; and (ii) that the person may apply to QCAT to have the original decision stayed.\n- (i) for the procedure for applying for the review and the way it is to be carried out; and\n- (ii) that the person may apply to QCAT to have the original decision stayed.\n- (i) for the procedure for applying for the review and the way it is to be carried out; and\n- (ii) that the person may apply to QCAT to have the original decision stayed.\n- (a) if the provision under which the approval may be applied for states that the ship’s owner may apply—the ship’s owner; or\n- (b) if the provision under which the approval may be applied for states that the ship’s master may apply—the ship’s master.","sortOrder":214},{"sectionNumber":"sec.117N","sectionType":"section","heading":"External review of decisions","content":"### sec.117N External review of decisions\n\nIf a reviewed decision is not the decision sought by the applicant for the review or an affected person, the chief executive must give the applicant a QCAT information notice for the reviewed decision.\nThe applicant or affected person may apply, as provided under the QCAT Act , to QCAT for a review of the reviewed decision.\nThe QCAT Act , section 22 (3) provides that QCAT may stay the operation of the reviewed decision, either on application by a person or on its own initiative.\nIn this section—\naffected person means an owner or master of a ship whose interests are affected by the reviewed decision.\nreviewed decision means the chief executive’s decision on a review under section 117M .\ns 117N ins 2009 No. 24 s 1751\namd 2019 No. 25 s 29\n(sec.117N-ssec.1) If a reviewed decision is not the decision sought by the applicant for the review or an affected person, the chief executive must give the applicant a QCAT information notice for the reviewed decision.\n(sec.117N-ssec.2) The applicant or affected person may apply, as provided under the QCAT Act , to QCAT for a review of the reviewed decision. The QCAT Act , section 22 (3) provides that QCAT may stay the operation of the reviewed decision, either on application by a person or on its own initiative.\n(sec.117N-ssec.3) In this section— affected person means an owner or master of a ship whose interests are affected by the reviewed decision. reviewed decision means the chief executive’s decision on a review under section 117M .","sortOrder":215},{"sectionNumber":"pt.14","sectionType":"part","heading":"Legal proceedings","content":"# Legal proceedings","sortOrder":216},{"sectionNumber":"pt.14-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Evidence","content":"## Evidence","sortOrder":217},{"sectionNumber":"sec.118","sectionType":"section","heading":"Evidentiary provisions","content":"### sec.118 Evidentiary provisions\n\nThis section applies to a proceeding under this Act or another Act prescribed by regulation.\nUnless a party, by reasonable notice, requires proof of—\nthe appointment of the chief executive, general manager, an analyst or an authorised officer; or\nthe authority of the chief executive, general manager, an analyst or an authorised officer to do anything under this Act;\nthe appointment or authority must be presumed.\nA signature purporting to be the signature of the chief executive, general manager, an analyst or an authorised officer is evidence of the signature it purports to be.\nA certificate purporting to be signed by the Minister stating that a stated person is or was the general manager at a time or during a stated period is evidence of the matter stated in the certificate.\nA certificate purporting to be signed by the chief executive or general manager stating any of the following matters is evidence of the matter—\na stated document is—\nan appointment or approval or a copy of an appointment or approval; or\na direction or decision, or a copy of a direction or decision, given or made under this Act; or\na record or document, a copy of a record or document, or an extract from a record or document, kept under this Act;\non a stated day, or during a stated period, a stated person was or was not the holder of an approval or a stated approval;\na stated approval was or was not in force on a stated day or during a stated period;\non a stated day, a stated person was given a stated order or direction under this Act;\na stated amount is payable under this Act by a stated person and has not been paid;\na stated substance is a pollutant;\nan instrument, equipment or installation was used in accordance with conditions prescribed by regulation for its use;\nanything else prescribed by regulation.\nIn a complaint starting a proceeding, a statement that the matter of the complaint came to the complainant’s knowledge on a stated day is evidence of the matter.\nThe production by the prosecutor of a signed analyst’s report stating any of the following matters is evidence of them—\nthe analyst took, or received from a stated person, the sample mentioned in the report;\nthe analyst analysed the sample on a stated day, or during a stated period, and at a stated place;\nthe results of the analysis.\nAny instrument, equipment or installation prescribed by regulation that is used by an authorised officer or analyst in accordance with the conditions (if any) prescribed by regulation is taken to be accurate and precise in the absence of evidence to the contrary.\nIn a proceeding in which the general manager applies to recover the costs and expenses incurred by the State, a port authority or a port operator in relation to the discharge of a pollutant the following certificates are evidence of the matters stated in them—\na certificate by the general manager stating that stated costs and expenses were incurred by the State, a port authority or a port operator and the way and purpose for which they were incurred;\na certificate by the chief executive that an election was made under section 113 (3) or 122 (2) .\ns 118 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2006 No. 21 s 33 ; 2008 No. 31 s 28 ; 2010 No. 19 s 139\n(sec.118-ssec.1) This section applies to a proceeding under this Act or another Act prescribed by regulation.\n(sec.118-ssec.2) Unless a party, by reasonable notice, requires proof of— the appointment of the chief executive, general manager, an analyst or an authorised officer; or the authority of the chief executive, general manager, an analyst or an authorised officer to do anything under this Act; the appointment or authority must be presumed.\n(sec.118-ssec.3) A signature purporting to be the signature of the chief executive, general manager, an analyst or an authorised officer is evidence of the signature it purports to be.\n(sec.118-ssec.4) A certificate purporting to be signed by the Minister stating that a stated person is or was the general manager at a time or during a stated period is evidence of the matter stated in the certificate.\n(sec.118-ssec.5) A certificate purporting to be signed by the chief executive or general manager stating any of the following matters is evidence of the matter— a stated document is— an appointment or approval or a copy of an appointment or approval; or a direction or decision, or a copy of a direction or decision, given or made under this Act; or a record or document, a copy of a record or document, or an extract from a record or document, kept under this Act; on a stated day, or during a stated period, a stated person was or was not the holder of an approval or a stated approval; a stated approval was or was not in force on a stated day or during a stated period; on a stated day, a stated person was given a stated order or direction under this Act; a stated amount is payable under this Act by a stated person and has not been paid; a stated substance is a pollutant; an instrument, equipment or installation was used in accordance with conditions prescribed by regulation for its use; anything else prescribed by regulation.\n(sec.118-ssec.6) In a complaint starting a proceeding, a statement that the matter of the complaint came to the complainant’s knowledge on a stated day is evidence of the matter.\n(sec.118-ssec.7) The production by the prosecutor of a signed analyst’s report stating any of the following matters is evidence of them— the analyst took, or received from a stated person, the sample mentioned in the report; the analyst analysed the sample on a stated day, or during a stated period, and at a stated place; the results of the analysis.\n(sec.118-ssec.8) Any instrument, equipment or installation prescribed by regulation that is used by an authorised officer or analyst in accordance with the conditions (if any) prescribed by regulation is taken to be accurate and precise in the absence of evidence to the contrary.\n(sec.118-ssec.9) In a proceeding in which the general manager applies to recover the costs and expenses incurred by the State, a port authority or a port operator in relation to the discharge of a pollutant the following certificates are evidence of the matters stated in them— a certificate by the general manager stating that stated costs and expenses were incurred by the State, a port authority or a port operator and the way and purpose for which they were incurred; a certificate by the chief executive that an election was made under section 113 (3) or 122 (2) .\n- (a) the appointment of the chief executive, general manager, an analyst or an authorised officer; or\n- (b) the authority of the chief executive, general manager, an analyst or an authorised officer to do anything under this Act;\n- (a) a stated document is— (i) an appointment or approval or a copy of an appointment or approval; or (ii) a direction or decision, or a copy of a direction or decision, given or made under this Act; or (iii) a record or document, a copy of a record or document, or an extract from a record or document, kept under this Act;\n- (i) an appointment or approval or a copy of an appointment or approval; or\n- (ii) a direction or decision, or a copy of a direction or decision, given or made under this Act; or\n- (iii) a record or document, a copy of a record or document, or an extract from a record or document, kept under this Act;\n- (b) on a stated day, or during a stated period, a stated person was or was not the holder of an approval or a stated approval;\n- (c) a stated approval was or was not in force on a stated day or during a stated period;\n- (d) on a stated day, a stated person was given a stated order or direction under this Act;\n- (e) a stated amount is payable under this Act by a stated person and has not been paid;\n- (f) a stated substance is a pollutant;\n- (g) an instrument, equipment or installation was used in accordance with conditions prescribed by regulation for its use;\n- (h) anything else prescribed by regulation.\n- (i) an appointment or approval or a copy of an appointment or approval; or\n- (ii) a direction or decision, or a copy of a direction or decision, given or made under this Act; or\n- (iii) a record or document, a copy of a record or document, or an extract from a record or document, kept under this Act;\n- (a) the analyst took, or received from a stated person, the sample mentioned in the report;\n- (b) the analyst analysed the sample on a stated day, or during a stated period, and at a stated place;\n- (c) the results of the analysis.\n- (a) a certificate by the general manager stating that stated costs and expenses were incurred by the State, a port authority or a port operator and the way and purpose for which they were incurred;\n- (b) a certificate by the chief executive that an election was made under section 113 (3) or 122 (2) .","sortOrder":218},{"sectionNumber":"sec.119","sectionType":"section","heading":"Analyst’s certificate or report produced by defendant","content":"### sec.119 Analyst’s certificate or report produced by defendant\n\nThe production by the defendant in a prosecution of a signed analyst’s report stating any of the following matters is evidence of them—\nthe analyst took, or received from a stated person, the sample mentioned in the report;\nthe analyst analysed the sample on a stated day, or during a stated period, and at a stated place;\nthe results of the analysis.\nThe defendant must send a copy of the report to the prosecutor at least 7 days before the day set down for the hearing.\n(sec.119-ssec.1) The production by the defendant in a prosecution of a signed analyst’s report stating any of the following matters is evidence of them— the analyst took, or received from a stated person, the sample mentioned in the report; the analyst analysed the sample on a stated day, or during a stated period, and at a stated place; the results of the analysis.\n(sec.119-ssec.2) The defendant must send a copy of the report to the prosecutor at least 7 days before the day set down for the hearing.\n- (a) the analyst took, or received from a stated person, the sample mentioned in the report;\n- (b) the analyst analysed the sample on a stated day, or during a stated period, and at a stated place;\n- (c) the results of the analysis.","sortOrder":219},{"sectionNumber":"sec.120","sectionType":"section","heading":"Responsibility for acts or omissions of representatives","content":"### sec.120 Responsibility for acts or omissions of representatives\n\nIf, in a proceeding for an offence against this Act, it is relevant to prove a person’s state of mind about a particular act or omission, it is enough to show—\nthe act or omission was done or omitted to be done by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority; and\nthe representative had the state of mind.\nAn act or omission done or omitted to be done for a person by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority is taken, in a proceeding for an offence against this Act, to have been done or omitted to be done also by the person, unless the person proves the person took all reasonable steps to prevent the acts or omissions.\n(sec.120-ssec.1) If, in a proceeding for an offence against this Act, it is relevant to prove a person’s state of mind about a particular act or omission, it is enough to show— the act or omission was done or omitted to be done by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority; and the representative had the state of mind.\n(sec.120-ssec.2) An act or omission done or omitted to be done for a person by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority is taken, in a proceeding for an offence against this Act, to have been done or omitted to be done also by the person, unless the person proves the person took all reasonable steps to prevent the acts or omissions.\n- (a) the act or omission was done or omitted to be done by a representative of the person within the scope of the representative’s actual or apparent authority; and\n- (b) the representative had the state of mind.","sortOrder":220},{"sectionNumber":"sec.121","sectionType":"section","heading":"Executive officer may be taken to have committed offence","content":"### sec.121 Executive officer may be taken to have committed offence\n\nIf a corporation commits an offence against a deemed executive liability provision, each executive officer of the corporation is taken to have also committed the offence if—\nthe officer authorised or permitted the corporation’s conduct constituting the offence; or\nthe officer was, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in the corporation’s conduct.\nThe executive officer may be proceeded against for, and convicted of, the offence against the deemed executive liability provision whether or not the corporation has been proceeded against for, or convicted of, the offence.\nThis section does not affect either of the following—\nthe liability of the corporation for the offence against the deemed executive liability provision;\nthe liability, under the Criminal Code , chapter 2 , of any person, whether or not the person is an executive officer of the corporation, for the offence against the deemed executive liability provision.\nIn this section—\ndeemed executive liability provision means any of the following provisions—\nsection 30 (1)\nsection 38 (1)\nsection 38A (1)\nsection 51 (2)\nsection 51 (3)\nsection 55A (2)\nsection 67A (2)\nsection 127 (5) .\ns 121 sub 2013 No. 51 s 207\n(sec.121-ssec.1) If a corporation commits an offence against a deemed executive liability provision, each executive officer of the corporation is taken to have also committed the offence if— the officer authorised or permitted the corporation’s conduct constituting the offence; or the officer was, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in the corporation’s conduct.\n(sec.121-ssec.2) The executive officer may be proceeded against for, and convicted of, the offence against the deemed executive liability provision whether or not the corporation has been proceeded against for, or convicted of, the offence.\n(sec.121-ssec.3) This section does not affect either of the following— the liability of the corporation for the offence against the deemed executive liability provision; the liability, under the Criminal Code , chapter 2 , of any person, whether or not the person is an executive officer of the corporation, for the offence against the deemed executive liability provision.\n(sec.121-ssec.4) In this section— deemed executive liability provision means any of the following provisions— section 30 (1) section 38 (1) section 38A (1) section 51 (2) section 51 (3) section 55A (2) section 67A (2) section 127 (5) .\n- (a) the officer authorised or permitted the corporation’s conduct constituting the offence; or\n- (b) the officer was, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in the corporation’s conduct.\n- (a) the liability of the corporation for the offence against the deemed executive liability provision;\n- (b) the liability, under the Criminal Code , chapter 2 , of any person, whether or not the person is an executive officer of the corporation, for the offence against the deemed executive liability provision.\n- • section 30 (1)\n- • section 38 (1)\n- • section 38A (1)\n- • section 51 (2)\n- • section 51 (3)\n- • section 55A (2)\n- • section 67A (2)\n- • section 127 (5) .","sortOrder":221},{"sectionNumber":"pt.14-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Legal proceedings","content":"## Legal proceedings","sortOrder":222},{"sectionNumber":"sec.122","sectionType":"section","heading":"How discharge expenses may be recovered","content":"### sec.122 How discharge expenses may be recovered\n\nThe State or a prescribed entity may recover discharge expenses as a debt.\nSee also the Protection of the Sea (Civil Liability) Act 1981 (Cwlth) and the Protection of the Sea (Oil Pollution Compensation Funds) Act 1993 (Cwlth) .\nThe chief executive may elect to recover a prescribed entity’s discharge expenses if the prescribed entity asks.\nIf the chief executive makes an election under subsection (2) , the reasonable costs of the prescribed entity are taken to be a debt payable to the State and may be recovered accordingly.\nAn amount recovered for a prescribed entity by the chief executive must be reimbursed to the prescribed entity.\nThis section does not limit the general manager’s power to recover discharge expenses by making a demand against a security as mentioned in section 115 (4) .\nIn this section—\ndischarge expenses has the meaning given in part 13 .\nprescribed entity has the meaning given in part 13 .\ns 122 amd 2001 No. 79 s 64 ; 2006 No. 21 s 34 ; 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch ; 2010 No. 19 s 140 ; 2019 No. 25 s 30\n(sec.122-ssec.1) The State or a prescribed entity may recover discharge expenses as a debt. See also the Protection of the Sea (Civil Liability) Act 1981 (Cwlth) and the Protection of the Sea (Oil Pollution Compensation Funds) Act 1993 (Cwlth) .\n(sec.122-ssec.2) The chief executive may elect to recover a prescribed entity’s discharge expenses if the prescribed entity asks.\n(sec.122-ssec.3) If the chief executive makes an election under subsection (2) , the reasonable costs of the prescribed entity are taken to be a debt payable to the State and may be recovered accordingly.\n(sec.122-ssec.4) An amount recovered for a prescribed entity by the chief executive must be reimbursed to the prescribed entity.\n(sec.122-ssec.5) This section does not limit the general manager’s power to recover discharge expenses by making a demand against a security as mentioned in section 115 (4) .\n(sec.122-ssec.6) In this section— discharge expenses has the meaning given in part 13 . prescribed entity has the meaning given in part 13 .","sortOrder":223},{"sectionNumber":"sec.123","sectionType":"section","heading":"Indictable and summary offences","content":"### sec.123 Indictable and summary offences\n\nAn offence against this Act for which the maximum penalty is at least 850 penalty units is an indictable offence.\nAny other offence against this Act is a summary offence.\n(sec.123-ssec.1) An offence against this Act for which the maximum penalty is at least 850 penalty units is an indictable offence.\n(sec.123-ssec.2) Any other offence against this Act is a summary offence.","sortOrder":224},{"sectionNumber":"sec.124","sectionType":"section","heading":"Proceedings for indictable offences","content":"### sec.124 Proceedings for indictable offences\n\nA proceeding for an indictable offence against this Act may be taken, at the prosecution’s election—\nby way of summary proceedings under the Justices Act 1886 ; or\non indictment.\nA magistrate must not hear an indictable offence summarily if—\nthe defendant asks at the start of the hearing that the charge be prosecuted on indictment; or\nthe magistrate considers that the charge should be prosecuted on indictment.\nIf subsection (2) applies—\nthe magistrate must proceed by way of an examination of witnesses for an indictable offence; and\na plea of the person charged at the start of the proceeding must be disregarded; and\nevidence brought in the proceeding before the magistrate decided to act under subsection (2) is taken to be evidence in the proceeding for the committal of the person for trial or sentence; and\nbefore committing the person for trial or sentence, the magistrate must make a statement to the person as required by the Justices Act 1886 , section 104 (2) (b) .\nThe maximum penalty that may be summarily imposed for an indictable offence is 1,000 penalty units.\n(sec.124-ssec.1) A proceeding for an indictable offence against this Act may be taken, at the prosecution’s election— by way of summary proceedings under the Justices Act 1886 ; or on indictment.\n(sec.124-ssec.2) A magistrate must not hear an indictable offence summarily if— the defendant asks at the start of the hearing that the charge be prosecuted on indictment; or the magistrate considers that the charge should be prosecuted on indictment.\n(sec.124-ssec.3) If subsection (2) applies— the magistrate must proceed by way of an examination of witnesses for an indictable offence; and a plea of the person charged at the start of the proceeding must be disregarded; and evidence brought in the proceeding before the magistrate decided to act under subsection (2) is taken to be evidence in the proceeding for the committal of the person for trial or sentence; and before committing the person for trial or sentence, the magistrate must make a statement to the person as required by the Justices Act 1886 , section 104 (2) (b) .\n(sec.124-ssec.4) The maximum penalty that may be summarily imposed for an indictable offence is 1,000 penalty units.\n- (a) by way of summary proceedings under the Justices Act 1886 ; or\n- (b) on indictment.\n- (a) the defendant asks at the start of the hearing that the charge be prosecuted on indictment; or\n- (b) the magistrate considers that the charge should be prosecuted on indictment.\n- (a) the magistrate must proceed by way of an examination of witnesses for an indictable offence; and\n- (b) a plea of the person charged at the start of the proceeding must be disregarded; and\n- (c) evidence brought in the proceeding before the magistrate decided to act under subsection (2) is taken to be evidence in the proceeding for the committal of the person for trial or sentence; and\n- (d) before committing the person for trial or sentence, the magistrate must make a statement to the person as required by the Justices Act 1886 , section 104 (2) (b) .","sortOrder":225},{"sectionNumber":"sec.125","sectionType":"section","heading":"Limitation on who may summarily hear indictable offence proceedings","content":"### sec.125 Limitation on who may summarily hear indictable offence proceedings\n\nA proceeding must be before a magistrate if it is a proceeding—\nfor the summary conviction of a person on a charge for an indictable offence; or\nfor an examination of witnesses for a charge for an indictable offence.\nHowever, if a proceeding for an indictable offence is brought before a justice who is not a magistrate, jurisdiction is limited to taking or making a procedural action or order within the meaning of the Justices of the Peace and Commissioners for Declarations Act 1991 .\n(sec.125-ssec.1) A proceeding must be before a magistrate if it is a proceeding— for the summary conviction of a person on a charge for an indictable offence; or for an examination of witnesses for a charge for an indictable offence.\n(sec.125-ssec.2) However, if a proceeding for an indictable offence is brought before a justice who is not a magistrate, jurisdiction is limited to taking or making a procedural action or order within the meaning of the Justices of the Peace and Commissioners for Declarations Act 1991 .\n- (a) for the summary conviction of a person on a charge for an indictable offence; or\n- (b) for an examination of witnesses for a charge for an indictable offence.","sortOrder":226},{"sectionNumber":"sec.126","sectionType":"section","heading":"Limitation on time for starting summary proceedings","content":"### sec.126 Limitation on time for starting summary proceedings\n\nA proceeding for an offence against this Act by way of summary proceeding under the Justices Act 1886 must start—\nwithin 2 years after the commission of the offence; or\nwithin 2 years after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge, but within 3 years after the commission of the offence.\nA statement in a complaint for an offence against this Act that the matter of the complaint came to the knowledge of the complainant on a stated day is evidence of when the matter came to the complainant’s knowledge.\ns 126 amd 2007 No. 6 s 29\n(sec.126-ssec.1) A proceeding for an offence against this Act by way of summary proceeding under the Justices Act 1886 must start— within 2 years after the commission of the offence; or within 2 years after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge, but within 3 years after the commission of the offence.\n(sec.126-ssec.2) A statement in a complaint for an offence against this Act that the matter of the complaint came to the knowledge of the complainant on a stated day is evidence of when the matter came to the complainant’s knowledge.\n- (a) within 2 years after the commission of the offence; or\n- (b) within 2 years after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge, but within 3 years after the commission of the offence.","sortOrder":227},{"sectionNumber":"sec.126A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Allegations of false or misleading statements or documents","content":"### sec.126A Allegations of false or misleading statements or documents\n\nIt is enough for a complaint for an offence against section 105 , 106 , 128G or 128H to state that a statement made, or document given, was ‘false or misleading’ to the person’s knowledge, without specifying whether it was false or whether it was misleading.\ns 126A ins 2006 No. 21 s 35","sortOrder":228},{"sectionNumber":"sec.127","sectionType":"section","heading":"Court may make orders about rehabilitation etc.","content":"### sec.127 Court may make orders about rehabilitation etc.\n\nIf a person is convicted of an offence against this Act, the court dealing with the matter may make an order under this section in addition to—\nany other penalty the court may impose under this Act, the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 or another Act; or\nany other order the court may make under this Act, the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 or another Act.\nSee section 147 (1) if an offence was committed entirely before the commencement of section 147 .\nThe court may order the defendant to do 1 or more of the following—\nto take stated action to rehabilitate or restore Queensland’s marine and coastal environment damaged because of the act or omission constituting the offence;\non application only by the prosecution, to do 1 or more of the following—\nto conduct a stated advertising or education campaign to promote compliance with the Act ;\nto make a stated private apology or publish a stated public apology to persons affected by the contravention;\nto operate a stated ship in a particular way, including putting a stated procedure or system in place for or on the ship to ensure compliance with the Act ;\nto repair, modify or replace a stated ship or part of a ship, or repair, modify, install or replace stated machinery or equipment on a stated ship to ensure compliance with the Act ;\nto start or stop a stated activity in relation to a stated ship;\nnot to own or operate any ship unless the general manager has given written consent for the ownership or operation;\nto comply with another order the court considers appropriate.\nAlso, if—\na person is convicted of an offence against this Act or the Marine Safety Act ; and\nthe act or omission constituting the offence caused the State, a port authority or a port operator to incur discharge expenses in relation to a discharge or likely discharge of pollutant from a ship into coastal waters;\nthe court may order the defendant to pay to the State, the port authority or the port operator the amount that could be recovered under section 122 (1) .\nAn order under this section is subject to any limitation of liability that may apply under a law of the State or the Commonwealth.\nProtection of the Sea (Civil Liability) Act 1981 (Cwlth)\nA person who contravenes an order under this section commits an offence against this Act.\nMaximum penalty—3,500 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment.\nIf a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\ns 127 amd 2001 No. 79 s 65\nsub 2006 No. 21 s 35\namd 2008 No. 31 s 72 sch ; 2010 No. 19 s 141 ; 2013 No. 51 s 229 sch 1 ; 2016 No. 3 s 76 sch 1\n(sec.127-ssec.1) If a person is convicted of an offence against this Act, the court dealing with the matter may make an order under this section in addition to— any other penalty the court may impose under this Act, the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 or another Act; or any other order the court may make under this Act, the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 or another Act. See section 147 (1) if an offence was committed entirely before the commencement of section 147 .\n(sec.127-ssec.2) The court may order the defendant to do 1 or more of the following— to take stated action to rehabilitate or restore Queensland’s marine and coastal environment damaged because of the act or omission constituting the offence; on application only by the prosecution, to do 1 or more of the following— to conduct a stated advertising or education campaign to promote compliance with the Act ; to make a stated private apology or publish a stated public apology to persons affected by the contravention; to operate a stated ship in a particular way, including putting a stated procedure or system in place for or on the ship to ensure compliance with the Act ; to repair, modify or replace a stated ship or part of a ship, or repair, modify, install or replace stated machinery or equipment on a stated ship to ensure compliance with the Act ; to start or stop a stated activity in relation to a stated ship; not to own or operate any ship unless the general manager has given written consent for the ownership or operation; to comply with another order the court considers appropriate.\n(sec.127-ssec.3) Also, if— a person is convicted of an offence against this Act or the Marine Safety Act ; and the act or omission constituting the offence caused the State, a port authority or a port operator to incur discharge expenses in relation to a discharge or likely discharge of pollutant from a ship into coastal waters; the court may order the defendant to pay to the State, the port authority or the port operator the amount that could be recovered under section 122 (1) .\n(sec.127-ssec.4) An order under this section is subject to any limitation of liability that may apply under a law of the State or the Commonwealth. Protection of the Sea (Civil Liability) Act 1981 (Cwlth)\n(sec.127-ssec.5) A person who contravenes an order under this section commits an offence against this Act. Maximum penalty—3,500 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment. If a corporation commits an offence against this provision, an executive officer of the corporation may be taken, under section 121 , to have also committed the offence.\n- (a) any other penalty the court may impose under this Act, the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 or another Act; or\n- (b) any other order the court may make under this Act, the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 or another Act.\n- (a) to take stated action to rehabilitate or restore Queensland’s marine and coastal environment damaged because of the act or omission constituting the offence;\n- (b) on application only by the prosecution, to do 1 or more of the following— (i) to conduct a stated advertising or education campaign to promote compliance with the Act ; (ii) to make a stated private apology or publish a stated public apology to persons affected by the contravention; (iii) to operate a stated ship in a particular way, including putting a stated procedure or system in place for or on the ship to ensure compliance with the Act ; (iv) to repair, modify or replace a stated ship or part of a ship, or repair, modify, install or replace stated machinery or equipment on a stated ship to ensure compliance with the Act ; (v) to start or stop a stated activity in relation to a stated ship; (vi) not to own or operate any ship unless the general manager has given written consent for the ownership or operation;\n- (i) to conduct a stated advertising or education campaign to promote compliance with the Act ;\n- (ii) to make a stated private apology or publish a stated public apology to persons affected by the contravention;\n- (iii) to operate a stated ship in a particular way, including putting a stated procedure or system in place for or on the ship to ensure compliance with the Act ;\n- (iv) to repair, modify or replace a stated ship or part of a ship, or repair, modify, install or replace stated machinery or equipment on a stated ship to ensure compliance with the Act ;\n- (v) to start or stop a stated activity in relation to a stated ship;\n- (vi) not to own or operate any ship unless the general manager has given written consent for the ownership or operation;\n- (c) to comply with another order the court considers appropriate.\n- (i) to conduct a stated advertising or education campaign to promote compliance with the Act ;\n- (ii) to make a stated private apology or publish a stated public apology to persons affected by the contravention;\n- (iii) to operate a stated ship in a particular way, including putting a stated procedure or system in place for or on the ship to ensure compliance with the Act ;\n- (iv) to repair, modify or replace a stated ship or part of a ship, or repair, modify, install or replace stated machinery or equipment on a stated ship to ensure compliance with the Act ;\n- (v) to start or stop a stated activity in relation to a stated ship;\n- (vi) not to own or operate any ship unless the general manager has given written consent for the ownership or operation;\n- (a) a person is convicted of an offence against this Act or the Marine Safety Act ; and\n- (b) the act or omission constituting the offence caused the State, a port authority or a port operator to incur discharge expenses in relation to a discharge or likely discharge of pollutant from a ship into coastal waters;","sortOrder":229},{"sectionNumber":"pt.14-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Service","content":"## Service","sortOrder":230},{"sectionNumber":"sec.128","sectionType":"section","heading":"Special provision for service of documents","content":"### sec.128 Special provision for service of documents\n\nA document may be served on a ship’s master by leaving it—\nif, at the time of service, there is a person on board who is apparently in charge of the ship—with the person after explaining to the person the purpose of the document; or\notherwise—in a reasonably secure way in a conspicuous position near the ship’s controls.\nIf a document is required or permitted to be served on a ship’s master and there is no master or apparently there is no master, the document may be served on—\nthe ship’s owner; or\nthe owner’s agent.\nA document is taken to be served on all owners of a ship if it is served on—\nany owner of the ship; or\nthe ship’s master; or\nan owner’s agent.\nNothing in this section affects—\nthe operation of another law that requires or permits service of a document other than as provided in this section; or\nthe court’s power to authorise service of a document other than as provided in this section.\nSee, for example, part 10 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 .\ns 128 amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n(sec.128-ssec.1) A document may be served on a ship’s master by leaving it— if, at the time of service, there is a person on board who is apparently in charge of the ship—with the person after explaining to the person the purpose of the document; or otherwise—in a reasonably secure way in a conspicuous position near the ship’s controls.\n(sec.128-ssec.2) If a document is required or permitted to be served on a ship’s master and there is no master or apparently there is no master, the document may be served on— the ship’s owner; or the owner’s agent.\n(sec.128-ssec.3) A document is taken to be served on all owners of a ship if it is served on— any owner of the ship; or the ship’s master; or an owner’s agent.\n(sec.128-ssec.4) Nothing in this section affects— the operation of another law that requires or permits service of a document other than as provided in this section; or the court’s power to authorise service of a document other than as provided in this section. See, for example, part 10 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 .\n- (a) if, at the time of service, there is a person on board who is apparently in charge of the ship—with the person after explaining to the person the purpose of the document; or\n- (b) otherwise—in a reasonably secure way in a conspicuous position near the ship’s controls.\n- (a) the ship’s owner; or\n- (b) the owner’s agent.\n- (a) any owner of the ship; or\n- (b) the ship’s master; or\n- (c) an owner’s agent.\n- (a) the operation of another law that requires or permits service of a document other than as provided in this section; or\n- (b) the court’s power to authorise service of a document other than as provided in this section.","sortOrder":231},{"sectionNumber":"pt.14A","sectionType":"part","heading":"Protection for whistleblowers","content":"# Protection for whistleblowers","sortOrder":232},{"sectionNumber":"sec.128A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for pt 14A","content":"### sec.128A Definitions for pt 14A\n\nIn this part—\ndisclosing person see section 128C (1) .\nofficial means—\nthe chief executive; or\nthe general manager; or\nthe marine pollution controller; or\nan authorised officer.\nreprisal see section 128E (3) .\ns 128A ins 2006 No. 21 s 36\n- (a) the chief executive; or\n- (b) the general manager; or\n- (c) the marine pollution controller; or\n- (d) an authorised officer.","sortOrder":233},{"sectionNumber":"sec.128B","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of pt 14A","content":"### sec.128B Application of pt 14A\n\nThis part applies to a person other than a person who makes a disclosure as a public officer under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010 .\nIf a disclosure is made under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010 , this part does not limit the application of that Act and that Act does limit the application of this part.\ns 128B ins 2006 No. 21 s 36\namd 2010 No. 38 s 78 sch\n(sec.128B-ssec.1) This part applies to a person other than a person who makes a disclosure as a public officer under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010 .\n(sec.128B-ssec.2) If a disclosure is made under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010 , this part does not limit the application of that Act and that Act does limit the application of this part.","sortOrder":234},{"sectionNumber":"sec.128C","sectionType":"section","heading":"General limitation","content":"### sec.128C General limitation\n\nA person (the disclosing person ) is not civilly or criminally liable for disclosing information to an official about a person’s conduct, whether committed before or after the commencement of this section, that the disclosing person honestly believes, on reasonable grounds, contravenes this Act.\nWithout limiting subsection (1) —\nin a proceeding for defamation, the disclosing person has a defence of absolute privilege for publishing the disclosed information; and\nif the disclosing person would otherwise be required to maintain confidentiality about the disclosed information under an Act, agreement, oath, rule of law or practice, the disclosing person does not—\ncontravene the Act , oath, rule of law or practice by making the disclosure; or\nbreach the agreement by making the disclosure.\nIn this section—\nagreement includes a contract or deed.\ns 128C ins 2006 No. 21 s 36\n(sec.128C-ssec.1) A person (the disclosing person ) is not civilly or criminally liable for disclosing information to an official about a person’s conduct, whether committed before or after the commencement of this section, that the disclosing person honestly believes, on reasonable grounds, contravenes this Act.\n(sec.128C-ssec.2) Without limiting subsection (1) — in a proceeding for defamation, the disclosing person has a defence of absolute privilege for publishing the disclosed information; and if the disclosing person would otherwise be required to maintain confidentiality about the disclosed information under an Act, agreement, oath, rule of law or practice, the disclosing person does not— contravene the Act , oath, rule of law or practice by making the disclosure; or breach the agreement by making the disclosure.\n(sec.128C-ssec.3) In this section— agreement includes a contract or deed.\n- (a) in a proceeding for defamation, the disclosing person has a defence of absolute privilege for publishing the disclosed information; and\n- (b) if the disclosing person would otherwise be required to maintain confidentiality about the disclosed information under an Act, agreement, oath, rule of law or practice, the disclosing person does not— (i) contravene the Act , oath, rule of law or practice by making the disclosure; or (ii) breach the agreement by making the disclosure.\n- (i) contravene the Act , oath, rule of law or practice by making the disclosure; or\n- (ii) breach the agreement by making the disclosure.\n- (i) contravene the Act , oath, rule of law or practice by making the disclosure; or\n- (ii) breach the agreement by making the disclosure.","sortOrder":235},{"sectionNumber":"sec.128D","sectionType":"section","heading":"Liability for conduct unaffected","content":"### sec.128D Liability for conduct unaffected\n\nThe liability of the disclosing person for his or her own conduct is not affected only because the disclosing person discloses the conduct to an official.\nHowever, a court may have regard to the disclosure if the disclosing person is prosecuted for an offence involving the conduct and either of the following applies—\nthe disclosing person is the master of a ship and his or her conduct was in compliance with an express instruction of the owner of the ship or someone authorised by the owner to give the instruction;\nthe disclosing person is another member of a ship’s crew and his or her conduct was in compliance with an express instruction of the master of the ship or someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.\nSubsection (2) does not limit the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 .\ns 128D ins 2006 No. 21 s 36\n(sec.128D-ssec.1) The liability of the disclosing person for his or her own conduct is not affected only because the disclosing person discloses the conduct to an official.\n(sec.128D-ssec.2) However, a court may have regard to the disclosure if the disclosing person is prosecuted for an offence involving the conduct and either of the following applies— the disclosing person is the master of a ship and his or her conduct was in compliance with an express instruction of the owner of the ship or someone authorised by the owner to give the instruction; the disclosing person is another member of a ship’s crew and his or her conduct was in compliance with an express instruction of the master of the ship or someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.\n(sec.128D-ssec.3) Subsection (2) does not limit the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 .\n- (a) the disclosing person is the master of a ship and his or her conduct was in compliance with an express instruction of the owner of the ship or someone authorised by the owner to give the instruction;\n- (b) the disclosing person is another member of a ship’s crew and his or her conduct was in compliance with an express instruction of the master of the ship or someone authorised by the master to give the instruction.","sortOrder":236},{"sectionNumber":"sec.128E","sectionType":"section","heading":"Reprisal and grounds for reprisal","content":"### sec.128E Reprisal and grounds for reprisal\n\nA person must not cause, or attempt or conspire to cause, detriment to another person because, or in the belief that, anybody has made, or may make, a disclosure as mentioned in section 128C (1) .\nAn attempt to cause detriment includes an attempt to induce a person to cause detriment.\nA contravention of subsection (1) is a reprisal or the taking of a reprisal.\nA ground mentioned in subsection (1) as the ground for a reprisal is the unlawful ground for the reprisal.\nFor the contravention to happen, it is sufficient if the unlawful ground is a substantial ground for the act or omission that is the reprisal, even if there is another ground for the act or omission.\ns 128E ins 2006 No. 21 s 36\n(sec.128E-ssec.1) A person must not cause, or attempt or conspire to cause, detriment to another person because, or in the belief that, anybody has made, or may make, a disclosure as mentioned in section 128C (1) .\n(sec.128E-ssec.2) An attempt to cause detriment includes an attempt to induce a person to cause detriment.\n(sec.128E-ssec.3) A contravention of subsection (1) is a reprisal or the taking of a reprisal.\n(sec.128E-ssec.4) A ground mentioned in subsection (1) as the ground for a reprisal is the unlawful ground for the reprisal.\n(sec.128E-ssec.5) For the contravention to happen, it is sufficient if the unlawful ground is a substantial ground for the act or omission that is the reprisal, even if there is another ground for the act or omission.","sortOrder":237},{"sectionNumber":"sec.128F","sectionType":"section","heading":"Damages entitlement or other remedy for reprisal","content":"### sec.128F Damages entitlement or other remedy for reprisal\n\nA reprisal is a tort and a person who takes a reprisal is liable in damages to anyone who suffers detriment as a result.\nAny appropriate remedy that may be granted by a court for a tort may be granted by a court for the taking of a reprisal.\nIf the claim for damages goes to trial in the Supreme Court or the District Court, it must be decided by a judge sitting without a jury.\nThis section does not limit any other remedy that may be available at law to the person against whom the reprisal is taken.\ns 128F ins 2006 No. 21 s 36\n(sec.128F-ssec.1) A reprisal is a tort and a person who takes a reprisal is liable in damages to anyone who suffers detriment as a result.\n(sec.128F-ssec.2) Any appropriate remedy that may be granted by a court for a tort may be granted by a court for the taking of a reprisal.\n(sec.128F-ssec.3) If the claim for damages goes to trial in the Supreme Court or the District Court, it must be decided by a judge sitting without a jury.\n(sec.128F-ssec.4) This section does not limit any other remedy that may be available at law to the person against whom the reprisal is taken.","sortOrder":238},{"sectionNumber":"sec.128G","sectionType":"section","heading":"False or misleading statements","content":"### sec.128G False or misleading statements\n\nA person must not, for section 128C (1) , state anything to an official that the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\ns 128G ins 2006 No. 21 s 36","sortOrder":239},{"sectionNumber":"sec.128H","sectionType":"section","heading":"False or misleading documents","content":"### sec.128H False or misleading documents\n\nA person must not, for section 128C (1) , give an official a document containing information the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nSubsection (1) does not apply to a person if the person, when giving the document—\ninforms the official, to the best of the person’s ability, how it is false or misleading; and\nif the person has, or can reasonably obtain, the correct information, gives the correct information.\ns 128H ins 2006 No. 21 s 36\n(sec.128H-ssec.1) A person must not, for section 128C (1) , give an official a document containing information the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.128H-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a person if the person, when giving the document— informs the official, to the best of the person’s ability, how it is false or misleading; and if the person has, or can reasonably obtain, the correct information, gives the correct information.\n- (a) informs the official, to the best of the person’s ability, how it is false or misleading; and\n- (b) if the person has, or can reasonably obtain, the correct information, gives the correct information.","sortOrder":240},{"sectionNumber":"pt.15","sectionType":"part","heading":"Administration","content":"# Administration","sortOrder":241},{"sectionNumber":"sec.129","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.129\n\ns 129 om 2006 No. 21 s 37","sortOrder":242},{"sectionNumber":"sec.130","sectionType":"section","heading":"Delegation by chief executive","content":"### sec.130 Delegation by chief executive\n\nThe chief executive may delegate the chief executive’s functions under this Act to an employee of MSQ, authorised officer or officer of the public service.\nIn this section—\nfunctions include powers.\ns 130 amd 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1 ; 2006 No. 21 s 39\n(sec.130-ssec.1) The chief executive may delegate the chief executive’s functions under this Act to an employee of MSQ, authorised officer or officer of the public service.\n(sec.130-ssec.2) In this section— functions include powers.","sortOrder":243},{"sectionNumber":"sec.131","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.131\n\ns 131 om 2006 No. 21 s 40","sortOrder":244},{"sectionNumber":"sec.132","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.132\n\ns 132 orig s 132 om 1997 No. 66 s 56\nprev s 132 ins 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1\nom 2006 No. 21 s 40","sortOrder":245},{"sectionNumber":"sec.132A","sectionType":"section","heading":"Delegation by marine pollution controller","content":"### sec.132A Delegation by marine pollution controller\n\nThe marine pollution controller may delegate the marine pollution controller’s powers under this Act to—\nan employee of MSQ; or\nan authorised officer.\ns 132A ins 2005 No. 49 s 41\n- (a) an employee of MSQ; or\n- (b) an authorised officer.","sortOrder":246},{"sectionNumber":"pt.15A","sectionType":"part","heading":"Appointment of analysts","content":"# Appointment of analysts","sortOrder":247},{"sectionNumber":"sec.132B","sectionType":"section","heading":"Appointment and qualifications","content":"### sec.132B Appointment and qualifications\n\nThe general manager may appoint a person as an analyst.\nHowever, the general manager may appoint a person as an analyst only if satisfied the person is qualified for appointment because the person has the necessary expertise or experience.\ns 132B ins 2008 No. 31 s 29\n(sec.132B-ssec.1) The general manager may appoint a person as an analyst.\n(sec.132B-ssec.2) However, the general manager may appoint a person as an analyst only if satisfied the person is qualified for appointment because the person has the necessary expertise or experience.","sortOrder":248},{"sectionNumber":"sec.132C","sectionType":"section","heading":"Appointment conditions","content":"### sec.132C Appointment conditions\n\nAn analyst holds office on the conditions stated in the analyst’s instrument of appointment.\ns 132C ins 2008 No. 31 s 29","sortOrder":249},{"sectionNumber":"sec.132D","sectionType":"section","heading":"When analyst stops holding office","content":"### sec.132D When analyst stops holding office\n\nAn analyst stops holding office if any of the following happens—\nthe term of office stated in a condition of office ends;\nunder another condition of office, the analyst stops holding office;\nthe analyst’s resignation under section 132E takes effect.\nSubsection (1) does not limit the ways an analyst may stop holding office.\nIn this section—\ncondition of office means a condition on which the analyst holds office.\ns 132D ins 2008 No. 31 s 29\n(sec.132D-ssec.1) An analyst stops holding office if any of the following happens— the term of office stated in a condition of office ends; under another condition of office, the analyst stops holding office; the analyst’s resignation under section 132E takes effect.\n(sec.132D-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not limit the ways an analyst may stop holding office.\n(sec.132D-ssec.3) In this section— condition of office means a condition on which the analyst holds office.\n- (a) the term of office stated in a condition of office ends;\n- (b) under another condition of office, the analyst stops holding office;\n- (c) the analyst’s resignation under section 132E takes effect.","sortOrder":250},{"sectionNumber":"sec.132E","sectionType":"section","heading":"Resignation","content":"### sec.132E Resignation\n\nAn analyst may resign by signed notice given to the general manager.\ns 132E ins 2008 No. 31 s 29","sortOrder":251},{"sectionNumber":"pt.16","sectionType":"part","heading":"Miscellaneous","content":"# Miscellaneous","sortOrder":252},{"sectionNumber":"sec.132F","sectionType":"section","heading":"Recovery of damages","content":"### sec.132F Recovery of damages\n\nThis section applies if, because of a discharge prohibited by this Act, a person—\nsuffers loss of, or damage to, property; or\nincurs costs or expenses in preventing or mitigating or in attempting to prevent or mitigate any loss of, or damage to, property, including the property of someone else.\nThe person may recover the following amounts as a debt owing to the person—\nthe amount of the loss or damage mentioned in subsection (1) (a) ;\nthe amount of the costs or expenses, reasonably incurred, mentioned in subsection (1) (b) .\nThe following persons are jointly and severally liable for the amounts mentioned in subsection (2) —\nany person whose act or omission caused the discharge;\nif the discharge is from a ship—\nthe owner of the ship;\nthe master of the ship.\nHowever, subsection (3) does not apply to a member of a ship’s crew whose act or omission caused the discharge if—\nthe member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction; or\nthe member was acting under the direct supervision of the master or of someone authorised by the master for the purpose.\nFor subsection (1) —\na reference to a discharge prohibited by this Act is a reference to a discharge that constitutes a discharge offence in the absence of a lawful defence or excuse; and\nit is immaterial—\nwhether or not there would be a lawful defence or excuse to a charge for a discharge offence; and\nwhether or not a person mentioned in subsection (3) is prosecuted for a discharge offence.\ns 132F ins 2008 No. 31 s 30\n(sec.132F-ssec.1) This section applies if, because of a discharge prohibited by this Act, a person— suffers loss of, or damage to, property; or incurs costs or expenses in preventing or mitigating or in attempting to prevent or mitigate any loss of, or damage to, property, including the property of someone else.\n(sec.132F-ssec.2) The person may recover the following amounts as a debt owing to the person— the amount of the loss or damage mentioned in subsection (1) (a) ; the amount of the costs or expenses, reasonably incurred, mentioned in subsection (1) (b) .\n(sec.132F-ssec.3) The following persons are jointly and severally liable for the amounts mentioned in subsection (2) — any person whose act or omission caused the discharge; if the discharge is from a ship— the owner of the ship; the master of the ship.\n(sec.132F-ssec.4) However, subsection (3) does not apply to a member of a ship’s crew whose act or omission caused the discharge if— the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction; or the member was acting under the direct supervision of the master or of someone authorised by the master for the purpose.\n(sec.132F-ssec.5) For subsection (1) — a reference to a discharge prohibited by this Act is a reference to a discharge that constitutes a discharge offence in the absence of a lawful defence or excuse; and it is immaterial— whether or not there would be a lawful defence or excuse to a charge for a discharge offence; and whether or not a person mentioned in subsection (3) is prosecuted for a discharge offence.\n- (a) suffers loss of, or damage to, property; or\n- (b) incurs costs or expenses in preventing or mitigating or in attempting to prevent or mitigate any loss of, or damage to, property, including the property of someone else.\n- (a) the amount of the loss or damage mentioned in subsection (1) (a) ;\n- (b) the amount of the costs or expenses, reasonably incurred, mentioned in subsection (1) (b) .\n- (a) any person whose act or omission caused the discharge;\n- (b) if the discharge is from a ship— (i) the owner of the ship; (ii) the master of the ship.\n- (i) the owner of the ship;\n- (ii) the master of the ship.\n- (i) the owner of the ship;\n- (ii) the master of the ship.\n- (a) the member was complying with an instruction from the master or of someone authorised by the master to give the instruction; or\n- (b) the member was acting under the direct supervision of the master or of someone authorised by the master for the purpose.\n- (a) a reference to a discharge prohibited by this Act is a reference to a discharge that constitutes a discharge offence in the absence of a lawful defence or excuse; and\n- (b) it is immaterial— (i) whether or not there would be a lawful defence or excuse to a charge for a discharge offence; and (ii) whether or not a person mentioned in subsection (3) is prosecuted for a discharge offence.\n- (i) whether or not there would be a lawful defence or excuse to a charge for a discharge offence; and\n- (ii) whether or not a person mentioned in subsection (3) is prosecuted for a discharge offence.\n- (i) whether or not there would be a lawful defence or excuse to a charge for a discharge offence; and\n- (ii) whether or not a person mentioned in subsection (3) is prosecuted for a discharge offence.","sortOrder":253},{"sectionNumber":"sec.132G","sectionType":"section","heading":"Approval of forms","content":"### sec.132G Approval of forms\n\nThe chief executive may approve forms for use under this Act.\ns 132G ins 2008 No. 67 s 246","sortOrder":254},{"sectionNumber":"sec.133","sectionType":"section","heading":"Regulation-making power","content":"### sec.133 Regulation-making power\n\nThe Governor in Council may make regulations under this Act.\nA regulation may be made about any of the following matters—\nmarine pollution and issues about marine pollution;\na matter necessary or convenient for giving further effect to MARPOL or another treaty, convention or international agreement or document about marine pollution;\nthe way in which the tonnage of a ship is decided;\nkeeping oil pollution emergency plans, including shipboard oil pollution emergency plans;\nthe standard of treatment systems;\nthe standard of reception facilities;\nkeeping records, including, for example, an oil or cargo record book, and the nature of the entries to be made in the records;\nthe period for which, and the place at which, the records must be kept;\nrecords that must be sent to the general manager and their custody or disposal after receipt;\nimposition of fees;\ntaking and analysis of samples by an analyst;\nensuring the integrity and security of samples.\nWithout limiting subsection (1) or (2) , a regulation may also be made—\ngiving effect to Annex II, regulation 16 to MARPOL; and\ndeclaring a stated liquid substance has been provisionally assessed under Annex II, regulation 6.3 to MARPOL as a category X substance, category Y substance, category Z substance or Other substance; and\nfor a category X substance—declaring a residual concentration stated in the regulation is taken to be the residual concentration prescribed for the substance under Annex II, regulation 13.6 to MARPOL.\nThe regulations may provide that contravention of a regulation is an offence and prescribe a maximum penalty of not more than 350 penalty units.\ns 133 amd 2002 No. 15 s 39 ; 2006 No. 21 s 41 ; 2007 No. 43 s 14\n(sec.133-ssec.1) The Governor in Council may make regulations under this Act.\n(sec.133-ssec.2) A regulation may be made about any of the following matters— marine pollution and issues about marine pollution; a matter necessary or convenient for giving further effect to MARPOL or another treaty, convention or international agreement or document about marine pollution; the way in which the tonnage of a ship is decided; keeping oil pollution emergency plans, including shipboard oil pollution emergency plans; the standard of treatment systems; the standard of reception facilities; keeping records, including, for example, an oil or cargo record book, and the nature of the entries to be made in the records; the period for which, and the place at which, the records must be kept; records that must be sent to the general manager and their custody or disposal after receipt; imposition of fees; taking and analysis of samples by an analyst; ensuring the integrity and security of samples.\n(sec.133-ssec.3) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2) , a regulation may also be made— giving effect to Annex II, regulation 16 to MARPOL; and declaring a stated liquid substance has been provisionally assessed under Annex II, regulation 6.3 to MARPOL as a category X substance, category Y substance, category Z substance or Other substance; and for a category X substance—declaring a residual concentration stated in the regulation is taken to be the residual concentration prescribed for the substance under Annex II, regulation 13.6 to MARPOL.\n(sec.133-ssec.4) The regulations may provide that contravention of a regulation is an offence and prescribe a maximum penalty of not more than 350 penalty units.\n- (a) marine pollution and issues about marine pollution;\n- (b) a matter necessary or convenient for giving further effect to MARPOL or another treaty, convention or international agreement or document about marine pollution;\n- (c) the way in which the tonnage of a ship is decided;\n- (d) keeping oil pollution emergency plans, including shipboard oil pollution emergency plans;\n- (e) the standard of treatment systems;\n- (f) the standard of reception facilities;\n- (g) keeping records, including, for example, an oil or cargo record book, and the nature of the entries to be made in the records;\n- (h) the period for which, and the place at which, the records must be kept;\n- (i) records that must be sent to the general manager and their custody or disposal after receipt;\n- (j) imposition of fees;\n- (k) taking and analysis of samples by an analyst;\n- (l) ensuring the integrity and security of samples.\n- (a) giving effect to Annex II, regulation 16 to MARPOL; and\n- (b) declaring a stated liquid substance has been provisionally assessed under Annex II, regulation 6.3 to MARPOL as a category X substance, category Y substance, category Z substance or Other substance; and\n- (c) for a category X substance—declaring a residual concentration stated in the regulation is taken to be the residual concentration prescribed for the substance under Annex II, regulation 13.6 to MARPOL.","sortOrder":255},{"sectionNumber":"sec.134","sectionType":"section","heading":"Exemption of defence ships from Act","content":"### sec.134 Exemption of defence ships from Act\n\nThis Act does not apply to—\na ship under the control of the Australian Defence Force; or\na warship, naval auxiliary or other ship owned or operated by a foreign country and used, for the time being, only on government, non-commercial service of the country.\ns 134 amd 2010 No. 13 s 88 sch\n- (a) a ship under the control of the Australian Defence Force; or\n- (b) a warship, naval auxiliary or other ship owned or operated by a foreign country and used, for the time being, only on government, non-commercial service of the country.","sortOrder":256},{"sectionNumber":"sec.135","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.135\n\ns 135 om 2008 No. 31 s 31","sortOrder":257},{"sectionNumber":"pt.17","sectionType":"part","heading":"Transitional provisions","content":"# Transitional provisions","sortOrder":258},{"sectionNumber":"pt.17-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Provisions for Maritime Safety Queensland Act 2002","content":"## Provisions for Maritime Safety Queensland Act 2002","sortOrder":259},{"sectionNumber":"sec.136","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for div 1","content":"### sec.136 Definitions for div 1\n\nIn this division—\ncommencement means 6 August 2002.\ns 136 def commencement sub 2006 No. 21 s 43 (2)\nformer function of the chief executive means a function that, immediately before the commencement, was a function of the chief executive but that on the commencement became a function of the general manager.\ns 136 ins 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1\namd 2006 No. 21 s 43 (1); 2008 No. 31 s 72 sch","sortOrder":260},{"sectionNumber":"sec.137","sectionType":"section","heading":"Transition of chief executive’s functions to general manager","content":"### sec.137 Transition of chief executive’s functions to general manager\n\nIf—\na process relating to a former function of the chief executive was started before this section was commenced; and\nthe process was not completed before the commencement;\nthe chief executive must complete the process.\nthe process of suspending or cancelling an approval\nHowever, subsection (1) does not limit the chief executive’s power to delegate a function under the Transport Planning and Coordination Act 1994 .\ns 137 ins 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1\n(sec.137-ssec.1) If— a process relating to a former function of the chief executive was started before this section was commenced; and the process was not completed before the commencement; the chief executive must complete the process. the process of suspending or cancelling an approval\n(sec.137-ssec.2) However, subsection (1) does not limit the chief executive’s power to delegate a function under the Transport Planning and Coordination Act 1994 .\n- (a) a process relating to a former function of the chief executive was started before this section was commenced; and\n- (b) the process was not completed before the commencement;","sortOrder":261},{"sectionNumber":"sec.138","sectionType":"section","heading":"Agreements","content":"### sec.138 Agreements\n\nThis section applies to an agreement made by the chief executive when performing a former function of the chief executive that is in force immediately before the commencement.\nThe agreement continues to have effect after the commencement as if it had been made by the general manager.\ns 138 ins 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1\n(sec.138-ssec.1) This section applies to an agreement made by the chief executive when performing a former function of the chief executive that is in force immediately before the commencement.\n(sec.138-ssec.2) The agreement continues to have effect after the commencement as if it had been made by the general manager.","sortOrder":262},{"sectionNumber":"sec.139","sectionType":"section","heading":"Notices","content":"### sec.139 Notices\n\nThis section applies to a notice made, given or signed by the chief executive when performing a former function of the chief executive that is in force immediately before the commencement.\nThe notice continues to have effect after the commencement as if it had been made, given or signed by the general manager.\ns 139 ins 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1\n(sec.139-ssec.1) This section applies to a notice made, given or signed by the chief executive when performing a former function of the chief executive that is in force immediately before the commencement.\n(sec.139-ssec.2) The notice continues to have effect after the commencement as if it had been made, given or signed by the general manager.","sortOrder":263},{"sectionNumber":"sec.140","sectionType":"section","heading":"Appointments","content":"### sec.140 Appointments\n\nThis section applies to an appointment made by the chief executive when performing a former function of the chief executive that is current immediately before the commencement.\nThe appointment continues to have effect after the commencement as if it had been made by the general manager.\ns 140 ins 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1\n(sec.140-ssec.1) This section applies to an appointment made by the chief executive when performing a former function of the chief executive that is current immediately before the commencement.\n(sec.140-ssec.2) The appointment continues to have effect after the commencement as if it had been made by the general manager.","sortOrder":264},{"sectionNumber":"sec.141","sectionType":"section","heading":"Other things done by chief executive","content":"### sec.141 Other things done by chief executive\n\nThis section applies to anything done, made, given or signed by the chief executive when performing a former function of the chief executive that is in force immediately before the commencement and is not otherwise provided for under this part.\nThe thing continues to have effect after the commencement as if it had been done, made, given or signed by the general manager.\ns 141 ins 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1\n(sec.141-ssec.1) This section applies to anything done, made, given or signed by the chief executive when performing a former function of the chief executive that is in force immediately before the commencement and is not otherwise provided for under this part.\n(sec.141-ssec.2) The thing continues to have effect after the commencement as if it had been done, made, given or signed by the general manager.","sortOrder":265},{"sectionNumber":"sec.142","sectionType":"section","heading":"Particular references to chief executive","content":"### sec.142 Particular references to chief executive\n\nA reference in an Act or document to the chief executive may, if the context permits, be taken to be a reference to the general manager.\ns 142 ins 2002 No. 29 s 16 sch 1","sortOrder":266},{"sectionNumber":"pt.17-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Provisions for Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006","content":"## Provisions for Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006","sortOrder":267},{"sectionNumber":"sec.143","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of s 62","content":"### sec.143 Application of s 62\n\nSection 62, as in force immediately after the commencement of this section, does not apply in relation to an offence against section 61 committed entirely before the commencement.\nHowever section 62, as in force immediately before the commencement, applies in relation to an offence against section 61 committed entirely before the commencement.\ns 143 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44\n(sec.143-ssec.1) Section 62, as in force immediately after the commencement of this section, does not apply in relation to an offence against section 61 committed entirely before the commencement.\n(sec.143-ssec.2) However section 62, as in force immediately before the commencement, applies in relation to an offence against section 61 committed entirely before the commencement.","sortOrder":268},{"sectionNumber":"sec.144","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.144\n\ns 144 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44\nexp 17 May 2008 (see s 144(3))","sortOrder":269},{"sectionNumber":"sec.145","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authorised officers appointed by chief executive officer of port authority","content":"### sec.145 Authorised officers appointed by chief executive officer of port authority\n\nOn the commencement of this section, a port authorised officer stops being an authorised officer for the purposes of this Act, including for the application of section 74.\nA person who, immediately before the commencement, was a port authorised officer must, within 21 days after the commencement, return to the general manager the identity card given to the person under section 74, as in force at any time before the commencement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—40 penalty units.\nWithout limiting the court’s power to find an excuse is a reasonable excuse, it is a reasonable excuse if—\nfor the purposes of section 74 and other purposes, the identity card is a single identity card; and\nwithin 21 days after the commencement—\nthe person sought a new card in relation to the other purposes and gave written notice to the general manager about the other purposes; but\na new card in relation to the other purposes had not been issued.\nThe employment relationship between the person and the port authority in relation to which the person was previously appointed as an authorised officer is not affected only because of this section.\ns 145 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44\n(sec.145-ssec.1) On the commencement of this section, a port authorised officer stops being an authorised officer for the purposes of this Act, including for the application of section 74.\n(sec.145-ssec.2) A person who, immediately before the commencement, was a port authorised officer must, within 21 days after the commencement, return to the general manager the identity card given to the person under section 74, as in force at any time before the commencement, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—40 penalty units.\n(sec.145-ssec.3) Without limiting the court’s power to find an excuse is a reasonable excuse, it is a reasonable excuse if— for the purposes of section 74 and other purposes, the identity card is a single identity card; and within 21 days after the commencement— the person sought a new card in relation to the other purposes and gave written notice to the general manager about the other purposes; but a new card in relation to the other purposes had not been issued.\n(sec.145-ssec.4) The employment relationship between the person and the port authority in relation to which the person was previously appointed as an authorised officer is not affected only because of this section.\n- (a) for the purposes of section 74 and other purposes, the identity card is a single identity card; and\n- (b) within 21 days after the commencement— (i) the person sought a new card in relation to the other purposes and gave written notice to the general manager about the other purposes; but (ii) a new card in relation to the other purposes had not been issued.\n- (i) the person sought a new card in relation to the other purposes and gave written notice to the general manager about the other purposes; but\n- (ii) a new card in relation to the other purposes had not been issued.\n- (i) the person sought a new card in relation to the other purposes and gave written notice to the general manager about the other purposes; but\n- (ii) a new card in relation to the other purposes had not been issued.","sortOrder":270},{"sectionNumber":"sec.146","sectionType":"section","heading":"Protection from liability for port authorised officers and others and continuing liability for port authorities","content":"### sec.146 Protection from liability for port authorised officers and others and continuing liability for port authorities\n\nSection 76, as in force immediately before the commencement of this section, continues to apply in relation to an act or omission of a port authorised officer or a person acting under the direction of a port authorised officer.\ns 146 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44","sortOrder":271},{"sectionNumber":"sec.147","sectionType":"section","heading":"Making orders under s 127 and pt 13A, div 2","content":"### sec.147 Making orders under s 127 and pt 13A, div 2\n\nDespite section 127 as in force after the commencement of this section, section 127 as in force immediately before the commencement continues to apply to an offence committed entirely before the commencement.\nAn enforcement order or interim enforcement order may not be made under part 13A, division 2 in relation to an offence committed entirely before the commencement.\ns 147 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44\n(sec.147-ssec.1) Despite section 127 as in force after the commencement of this section, section 127 as in force immediately before the commencement continues to apply to an offence committed entirely before the commencement.\n(sec.147-ssec.2) An enforcement order or interim enforcement order may not be made under part 13A, division 2 in relation to an offence committed entirely before the commencement.","sortOrder":272},{"sectionNumber":"sec.148","sectionType":"section","heading":"Delegation under s 132 as in force before commencement","content":"### sec.148 Delegation under s 132 as in force before commencement\n\nThis section applies to a delegation under section 132 by the general manager of a power under this Act as the delegation is in force immediately before the commencement of this section.\nThe delegation continues in force as a delegation under the Maritime Safety Queensland Act 2002 , section 11A until it is amended or repealed under that Act.\nThe Maritime Safety Queensland Act 2002 , section 11A provides for the general manager to delegate his or her functions under that Act or another Act to appropriate persons, namely an employee of MSQ, an authorised officer or a shipping inspector under the Transport Operations (Marine Safety) Act 1994 .\ns 148 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44\n(sec.148-ssec.1) This section applies to a delegation under section 132 by the general manager of a power under this Act as the delegation is in force immediately before the commencement of this section.\n(sec.148-ssec.2) The delegation continues in force as a delegation under the Maritime Safety Queensland Act 2002 , section 11A until it is amended or repealed under that Act. The Maritime Safety Queensland Act 2002 , section 11A provides for the general manager to delegate his or her functions under that Act or another Act to appropriate persons, namely an employee of MSQ, an authorised officer or a shipping inspector under the Transport Operations (Marine Safety) Act 1994 .","sortOrder":273},{"sectionNumber":"sec.149","sectionType":"section","heading":"Previous exercise of powers by port authority officer not affected","content":"### sec.149 Previous exercise of powers by port authority officer not affected\n\nSection 145(1) does not affect the exercise of a power by a port authorised officer made under this Act before the commencement of this section as an authorised officer, including, for example, under part 12, divisions 3, 4 and 5.\nHowever, if this Act provides that after exercising a power, an authorised officer must do a thing ( discharge a duty ), the port authorised officer must discharge the duty and give written notice to the general manager about discharging the duty.\nUnder section 84, an authorised officer may have exercised a power and detained a ship before the commencement of this section. However, the authorised officer may not have given an approved notice under section 85 about the detention before the commencement. A person who was a port authorised officer must comply with section 85 and give a notice to the ship’s master.\nAlso, if this Act provides that after exercising a power (the first power ), an authorised officer may exercise another power ( other power )—\nthe port authorised officer may not exercise the other power but must give written notice to the general manager about the other power not having been exercised; and\nthe general manager may exercise the other power even though the provision about the other power provides that the other power may only be exercised by the authorised officer who exercised the first power.\ns 149 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44\n(sec.149-ssec.1) Section 145(1) does not affect the exercise of a power by a port authorised officer made under this Act before the commencement of this section as an authorised officer, including, for example, under part 12, divisions 3, 4 and 5.\n(sec.149-ssec.2) However, if this Act provides that after exercising a power, an authorised officer must do a thing ( discharge a duty ), the port authorised officer must discharge the duty and give written notice to the general manager about discharging the duty. Under section 84, an authorised officer may have exercised a power and detained a ship before the commencement of this section. However, the authorised officer may not have given an approved notice under section 85 about the detention before the commencement. A person who was a port authorised officer must comply with section 85 and give a notice to the ship’s master.\n(sec.149-ssec.3) Also, if this Act provides that after exercising a power (the first power ), an authorised officer may exercise another power ( other power )— the port authorised officer may not exercise the other power but must give written notice to the general manager about the other power not having been exercised; and the general manager may exercise the other power even though the provision about the other power provides that the other power may only be exercised by the authorised officer who exercised the first power.\n- (a) the port authorised officer may not exercise the other power but must give written notice to the general manager about the other power not having been exercised; and\n- (b) the general manager may exercise the other power even though the provision about the other power provides that the other power may only be exercised by the authorised officer who exercised the first power.","sortOrder":274},{"sectionNumber":"sec.150","sectionType":"section","heading":"Emergency response powers under pt 12, div 6","content":"### sec.150 Emergency response powers under pt 12, div 6\n\nIf, immediately before the commencement of this section, a port authority had prime responsibility for a discharge as mentioned in section 93(3) as in force immediately before the commencement—\nthe port authority continues to have the prime responsibility; but\nthe State may assume prime responsibility in the way stated in section 93(4) as in force immediately before the commencement as if that subsection had not been omitted by the Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 .\nA declaration under\nsection 94(1), as in force immediately before the commencement, is not affected only because the declaration could not be made under section 94(1) after the commencement.\ns 150 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44\n(sec.150-ssec.1) If, immediately before the commencement of this section, a port authority had prime responsibility for a discharge as mentioned in section 93(3) as in force immediately before the commencement— the port authority continues to have the prime responsibility; but the State may assume prime responsibility in the way stated in section 93(4) as in force immediately before the commencement as if that subsection had not been omitted by the Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 .\n(sec.150-ssec.2) A declaration under section 94(1), as in force immediately before the commencement, is not affected only because the declaration could not be made under section 94(1) after the commencement.\n- (a) the port authority continues to have the prime responsibility; but\n- (b) the State may assume prime responsibility in the way stated in section 93(4) as in force immediately before the commencement as if that subsection had not been omitted by the Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 .","sortOrder":275},{"sectionNumber":"sec.151","sectionType":"section","heading":"Continuing liability of port authority for compensation","content":"### sec.151 Continuing liability of port authority for compensation\n\nThis section applies to a person who may, before the commencement of this section, claim compensation from a port authority under section 110 as in force before the commencement of this section.\nSection 110, as in force immediately before the commencement, continues to apply in relation to the person and the person may make a claim under that section as if that section had not been amended.\nIf, under this section, the port authority pays compensation to a person, the definition discharge expenses in section 111 is taken to include an amount reasonably paid as compensation by the port authority.\ns 151 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44\n(sec.151-ssec.1) This section applies to a person who may, before the commencement of this section, claim compensation from a port authority under section 110 as in force before the commencement of this section.\n(sec.151-ssec.2) Section 110, as in force immediately before the commencement, continues to apply in relation to the person and the person may make a claim under that section as if that section had not been amended.\n(sec.151-ssec.3) If, under this section, the port authority pays compensation to a person, the definition discharge expenses in section 111 is taken to include an amount reasonably paid as compensation by the port authority.","sortOrder":276},{"sectionNumber":"sec.152","sectionType":"section","heading":"If port authority has started to recover discharge expenses before commencement","content":"### sec.152 If port authority has started to recover discharge expenses before commencement\n\nIf, before the commencement of this section, a port authority started to recover discharge expenses under section 115 and the matter was not completed on the commencement, the port authority may continue to recover the discharge expenses under section 115 as if—\nthe section had not been amended; and\nthe definition administering authority had not been omitted by the Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 .\nAn appeal may be made by or against a port authority under section 116 as if that section had not been amended by the Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 if—\nimmediately before the commencement, an appeal may be made under section 116 by a person whose interests were affected by a decision under section 115; or\na person’s interests were affected by a decision under section 115 as in force immediately before the commencement because of subsection (1).\ns 152 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44\n(sec.152-ssec.1) If, before the commencement of this section, a port authority started to recover discharge expenses under section 115 and the matter was not completed on the commencement, the port authority may continue to recover the discharge expenses under section 115 as if— the section had not been amended; and the definition administering authority had not been omitted by the Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 .\n(sec.152-ssec.2) An appeal may be made by or against a port authority under section 116 as if that section had not been amended by the Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 if— immediately before the commencement, an appeal may be made under section 116 by a person whose interests were affected by a decision under section 115; or a person’s interests were affected by a decision under section 115 as in force immediately before the commencement because of subsection (1).\n- (a) the section had not been amended; and\n- (b) the definition administering authority had not been omitted by the Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 .\n- (a) immediately before the commencement, an appeal may be made under section 116 by a person whose interests were affected by a decision under section 115; or\n- (b) a person’s interests were affected by a decision under section 115 as in force immediately before the commencement because of subsection (1).","sortOrder":277},{"sectionNumber":"sec.153","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of s 118 to particular matters","content":"### sec.153 Application of s 118 to particular matters\n\nSection 118, as in force immediately before the commencement of this section, applies in relation to a matter for a proceeding under this Act if—\na provision is amended by the Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 ; and\nthe provision, as in force immediately before the amendment, continues to apply in relation to the matter.\ns 153 ins 2006 No. 21 s 44\n- (a) a provision is amended by the Maritime and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2006 ; and\n- (b) the provision, as in force immediately before the amendment, continues to apply in relation to the matter.","sortOrder":278},{"sectionNumber":"pt.17-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Provisions for Transport Legislation Amendment Act 2008 , part 5","content":"## Provisions for Transport Legislation Amendment Act 2008 , part 5","sortOrder":279},{"sectionNumber":"sec.154","sectionType":"section","heading":"Appointments of analysts","content":"### sec.154 Appointments of analysts\n\nAn appointment of a person as an analyst made by the general manager before the commencement of section 132B and in force immediately before the commencement—\ncontinues in force according to its terms; and\nis taken to have been made under that section.\ns 154 ins 2008 No. 31 s 32\n- (a) continues in force according to its terms; and\n- (b) is taken to have been made under that section.","sortOrder":280},{"sectionNumber":"sec.155","sectionType":"section","heading":"Actions done and documents made by analysts","content":"### sec.155 Actions done and documents made by analysts\n\nThis section applies to an action done or a document made by an analyst before the commencement of section 132B.\nThe action or document—\ncontinues in force or to have effect according to its terms; and\nis taken to have been done or made as if the analyst had been appointed under that section.\ns 155 ins 2008 No. 31 s 32\n(sec.155-ssec.1) This section applies to an action done or a document made by an analyst before the commencement of section 132B.\n(sec.155-ssec.2) The action or document— continues in force or to have effect according to its terms; and is taken to have been done or made as if the analyst had been appointed under that section.\n- (a) continues in force or to have effect according to its terms; and\n- (b) is taken to have been done or made as if the analyst had been appointed under that section.","sortOrder":281},{"sectionNumber":"sec.156","sectionType":"section","heading":"Recovery of damages","content":"### sec.156 Recovery of damages\n\nTo remove any doubt, it is declared that section 132F applies only in relation to a discharge prohibited by this Act that happens after the commencement of that section.\ns 156 ins 2008 No. 31 s 32","sortOrder":282},{"sectionNumber":"pt.17-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Transitional provisions for Transport and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2008 , part 7 , division 1","content":"## Transitional provisions for Transport and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2008 , part 7 , division 1","sortOrder":283},{"sectionNumber":"sec.157","sectionType":"section","heading":"Provision for prosecutions under previous s 38(4)","content":"### sec.157 Provision for prosecutions under previous s 38(4)\n\nThis section applies if a prosecution against a person for an offence against previous section 38(4) was started but not finished before the commencement.\nDespite the Criminal Code, section 11, the prosecution may continue and be dealt with as if the Transport and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2008 had not been enacted.\nIn this section—\ncommencement means the commencement of this section.\nprevious section 38(4) means section 38(4) as in force before the commencement.\ns 157 ins 2008 No. 67 s 247\n(sec.157-ssec.1) This section applies if a prosecution against a person for an offence against previous section 38(4) was started but not finished before the commencement.\n(sec.157-ssec.2) Despite the Criminal Code, section 11, the prosecution may continue and be dealt with as if the Transport and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2008 had not been enacted.\n(sec.157-ssec.3) In this section— commencement means the commencement of this section. previous section 38(4) means section 38(4) as in force before the commencement.","sortOrder":284},{"sectionNumber":"sec.158","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of s 50A","content":"### sec.158 Application of s 50A\n\nSection 50A does not apply to a prescribed ship that is an existing ship until 19 May 2010.\nIn this section—\nprescribed ship see section 50A.\ns 158 ins 2008 No. 67 s 247\n(sec.158-ssec.1) Section 50A does not apply to a prescribed ship that is an existing ship until 19 May 2010.\n(sec.158-ssec.2) In this section— prescribed ship see section 50A.","sortOrder":285},{"sectionNumber":"pt.17-div.5","sectionType":"division","heading":"Transitional provision for Transport and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2010","content":"## Transitional provision for Transport and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2010","sortOrder":286},{"sectionNumber":"sec.159","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### Section sec.159\n\ns 159 ins 2010 No. 13 s 93\nom 2013 No. 39 s 109 sch 2","sortOrder":287},{"sectionNumber":"pt.17-div.6","sectionType":"division","heading":"Transitional provision for Transport and Other Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 2010","content":"## Transitional provision for Transport and Other Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 2010","sortOrder":288},{"sectionNumber":"sec.160","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of s 49","content":"### sec.160 Application of s 49\n\nDespite the amendment of section 49(1) by the Transport and Other Legislation Amendment Act (No. 2) 2010 , section 49 as in force before the commencement of this section continues to apply to a declared ship until the end of 30 June 2011.\ns 160 ins 2010 No. 19 s 233","sortOrder":289},{"sectionNumber":"pt.17-div.7","sectionType":"division","heading":"Transitional provisions for Transport Legislation (Road Safety and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2019","content":"## Transitional provisions for Transport Legislation (Road Safety and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2019","sortOrder":290},{"sectionNumber":"sec.161","sectionType":"section","heading":"Recovery of discharge expenses incurred by particular entities","content":"### sec.161 Recovery of discharge expenses incurred by particular entities\n\nPart 13 and section 122 apply to discharge expenses incurred by a prescribed entity only if the expenses are incurred after the commencement.\nIn this section—\ndischarge expenses see section 111.\nprescribed entity means an entity mentioned in section 111, definition prescribed entity , paragraph (b).\ns 161 ins 2019 No. 25 s 31\n(sec.161-ssec.1) Part 13 and section 122 apply to discharge expenses incurred by a prescribed entity only if the expenses are incurred after the commencement.\n(sec.161-ssec.2) In this section— discharge expenses see section 111. prescribed entity means an entity mentioned in section 111, definition prescribed entity , paragraph (b).","sortOrder":291},{"sectionNumber":"sec.162","sectionType":"section","heading":"Securing compliance for particular offences","content":"### sec.162 Securing compliance for particular offences\n\nPart 13A applies in relation to an offence against section 86A(4), (5) or (8) only if the offence is committed after the commencement.\ns 162 ins 2019 No. 25 s 31","sortOrder":292}],"analysis":{"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":9,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"Originally enacted to implement MARPOL Annexes I, II, III, and V (oil, noxious liquids, packaged harmful substances, garbage), the Act has been significantly expanded. Major additions include: Part 7 (sewage regulation, 2002), Part 11A (mandatory insurance, 2002), Part 13A (enforcement orders and undertakings, 2006), Part 14A (whistleblower protections, 2006), and expanded definitions and powers through numerous amendments. The Act now covers a broader range of pollutants and imposes more prescriptive compliance and enforcement mechanisms than its original scope."},"complexity_factors":["Extensive cross-referencing to MARPOL annexes and other Commonwealth/state Acts","Over 100 sections with multiple subdivisions and nested definitions","Dictionary in schedule with dozens of defined terms","Conditional and tiered offence provisions (e.g., different rules for ship size, type, and location)","Multiple separate regimes for oil, noxious liquids, packaged substances, sewage, garbage, and transfer operations","Complex defences and exemptions with subjective reasonableness tests","Wide range of penalty units (20 to 100,000) with daily penalties for continuing offences","Layered enforcement powers (warrants, detention, emergency intervention) with procedural requirements","Transitional provisions spanning multiple amendment Acts"],"plain_english_summary":"This Queensland law bans ships from dumping harmful substances (oil, chemicals, sewage, garbage) into state coastal waters. It sets strict rules for ship equipment, record-keeping, and emergency planning. Government officers can inspect ships, order clean-ups, and detain vessels that break the rules. Ship owners must have insurance to cover pollution clean-up costs. Ports must provide waste disposal facilities. The law gives effect to international MARPOL rules and creates serious penalties—up to 100,000 penalty units for companies. It also includes defences for emergencies and allows for alternative compliance methods like enforceable undertakings."},"summary":{"complexity_score":8,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The Act's original scope in 1995 focused on implementing MARPOL's five annexes for oil, noxious liquids, packaged harmful substances, sewage, and garbage in Queensland coastal waters. Over time, amendments significantly expanded its practical reach: sewage regulation was substantially restructured and expanded in 2002 to add 'nil discharge' zones, declared ships, and treatment system requirements; new provisions for international voyage ships (section 50A) were added in 2008 to implement updated MARPOL Annex IV obligations; requirements for shipboard oil pollution emergency plans (section 30) and noxious liquid emergency plans (section 38A) were strengthened; and garbage placard requirements (section 55AA) were added. The overall protective purpose remained consistent, but the regulatory machinery grew considerably more detailed and prescriptive than the original Act contemplated."},"complexity_factors":["Incorporates by reference a complex international treaty (MARPOL) and all five of its annexes, each with their own definitions and standards that interact with Queensland law","Multiple layered definition schemes — MARPOL definitions, annex-specific definitions, and Act-specific definitions that must be read together, with displacement rules when inconsistent","Strict liability offences that apply despite normal Criminal Code defences (sections 23 and 24), creating an unusual criminal law framework","Multiple categories of pollutants (oil, noxious liquids, packaged substances, sewage, garbage), each governed by separate parts of the Act with distinct rules, defences, and exemptions","Complex sewage provisions with overlapping regimes: 'nil discharge' zones for untreated sewage, separate 'nil discharge' zones for treated sewage, 'declared ships,' 'prescribed ships,' and ships with fixed toilets each having different obligations","Jurisdiction is geographically limited and complex — the 3 nautical mile rule requires understanding the interplay between state and Commonwealth maritime law","Multiple categories of persons can be simultaneously liable (owner, master, crew), with specific carve-outs for crew following orders, creating nuanced liability questions","Repeated amendments across many years (1995–2016) have created a patchwork of inserted, substituted, and omitted sections that require careful tracking","References to multiple other Queensland and Commonwealth Acts (Marine Safety Act, Environmental Protection Act 1994, Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983 (Cwlth), Coastal Waters (State Powers) Act 1980 (Cwlth))","Ship size thresholds, tonnage requirements, and vessel classification criteria create technically precise applicability rules that require specialised maritime knowledge to interpret"],"plain_english_summary":"## Transport Operations (Marine Pollution) Act 1995 — What It Does and Who It Affects\n\n### The Big Picture\nThis is Queensland's main law for preventing ships from polluting coastal waters. It implements an international treaty called **MARPOL** (the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships) as Queensland state law, covering the first 3 nautical miles of Queensland's coastal waters and tidal waterways.\n\n### What It Prohibits\nThe Act makes it a serious offence to discharge (release) any of the following from a ship into Queensland's coastal waters:\n- **Oil** (including oily mixtures) — e.g., fuel spills, bilge water\n- **Noxious liquid substances in bulk** — e.g., industrial chemicals carried in ship tanks\n- **Packaged harmful substances** — e.g., dangerous goods in containers or drums thrown overboard\n- **Sewage** — raw or even treated sewage in designated protected waters\n- **Garbage** — including plastics\n\n### Who Can Be Prosecuted?\nThe law casts a wide net. For almost every offence, **all three** of the following can be charged:\n1. The **ship's owner** (even a company)\n2. The **ship's master** (the captain)\n3. Any **crew member** whose actions caused or contributed to the pollution (unless they were just following orders from the captain)\n\nThis means you can be prosecuted even if the discharge was accidental.\n\n### Penalties\nPenalties are severe:\n- **Oil, noxious substances, harmful packaged substances**: Up to **5,000 penalty units** for an individual, or **100,000 penalty units** for a company — at current Queensland rates (approx. $161.30 per unit as of 2024), that's potentially **$806,500 for individuals** and **$16.13 million for corporations**.\n- **Sewage and garbage offences**: Up to **850–3,500 penalty units**.\n\n### Defences Available\nYou have a defence if the pollution was caused by:\n- An emergency to save the ship or lives at sea\n- Accidental damage (not intentional), where you took all reasonable steps to minimise the spill\n- Approved pollution-fighting operations (e.g., controlled discharge to fight a larger spill)\n\n### Key Requirements for Ship Operators\nShip owners and masters must also:\n- Have **oil pollution emergency plans** on board (ships over certain sizes)\n- Have **procedures and arrangements manuals** for ships carrying chemicals\n- Have **sewage management plans** for designated vessels\n- Have **waste management plans** for larger ships or those sleeping 15+ people\n- Fit ships with **sewage holding devices or treatment systems** in protected waters\n- Display **garbage disposal notice placards** on ships 12m or longer\n\n### Sewage Rules — More Detail\nSewage rules are particularly layered:\n- Certain designated areas are **'nil discharge' zones** — you cannot discharge any sewage (even treated) there\n- Some ship types must be fitted with sewage holding tanks, treatment systems, or both\n- International ships of 400+ gross tonnes (a measure of ship size) or carrying more than 15 people must have approved sewage systems on board\n\n### Jurisdictional Note\nThis law only covers Queensland's **coastal waters** — broadly, within 3 nautical miles of the coast and tidal waters. Beyond that, Commonwealth (federal) law applies. Both systems are designed to work together.\n\n### Who Does This Affect?\n- **Ship owners and operators** (commercial and recreational, Australian and foreign)\n- **Ship masters and crew**\n- **Shipping agents** (people who arrange berthing, cargo loading, or fuel for ships)\n- **Companies in the maritime industry** (including executives, who can personally face charges if their company offends)\n- **Recreational boaters** — if your vessel has a fixed toilet and you're in a protected waterway, the sewage rules apply to you too"},"kimi_summary":{"_metrics":{"source":"grok-batch-everything"},"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":8,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The core purpose remains implementing MARPOL and minimising ship-sourced pollution in coastal waters as a complement to Commonwealth and other states' approaches (s.3). However, the Act has expanded significantly beyond initial intent through amendments adding detailed sewage and garbage controls (Parts 7-8), mandatory insurance for larger ships (s.67A), whistleblower protections (Part 14A), broader emergency powers and cost recovery (Parts 12-13), and enforcement orders (Part 13A), reflecting evolving environmental risks and international standards."},"complexity_factors":["Extensive cross-references to MARPOL annexes and definitions that can extend or displace them (e.g. ss.5, 25, 34, 41, 46, 54, 60)","Separate parts with pollutant-specific prohibitions, defences, exemptions, plans, and equipment requirements (Parts 4-9)","Nested definitions, exceptions to exceptions, and interactions with other laws like the Marine Safety Act, domestic commercial vessel national law, and Environmental Protection Act 1994","Detailed enforcement powers, emergency response, cost recovery, insurance, whistleblower protections, and transitional provisions","Conditional logic for discharges, nil discharge waters, prescribed ships, and defences (e.g. ss.26-29, 47-51, 62)"],"plain_english_summary":"**Protecting Queensland's marine environment from ship pollution**\n\nThis Act protects Queensland's coastal waters by minimising deliberate or accidental pollution from ships. It mainly works by adopting key international rules from MARPOL (the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships) for five types of pollutants: oil (Annex I), noxious liquid substances like chemicals (Annex II), harmful substances in packaged form (Annex III), sewage (Annex IV), and garbage (Annex V).\n\nIt applies to all ships in Queensland's coastal waters (generally the first 3 nautical miles from shore, plus tidal areas). Ship owners, masters, and crew must prevent discharges, carry specific plans and equipment (like oil spill response plans or sewage treatment systems), monitor operations, and report incidents. The Act allows authorised officers to board ships, investigate, detain vessels, issue emergency orders, and take cleanup action. Severe penalties apply for breaches, including fines up to 100,000 penalty units for companies or jail time. The government can recover cleanup costs from those responsible, and ships over a certain size need insurance for pollution incidents.\n\nIt matters because it keeps beaches, marine life, and fisheries safe, supports a complementary national approach with the Commonwealth, and promotes education and high penalties to deter pollution. Defences exist for emergencies or accidents if reasonable steps are taken, but the rules are strict to protect the environment."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/transport-operations-marine-pollution-act-1995","history":"/api/acts/transport-operations-marine-pollution-act-1995/history","analysis":"/api/acts/transport-operations-marine-pollution-act-1995/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/transport-operations-marine-pollution-act-1995/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/transport-operations-marine-pollution-act-1995/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/transport-operations-marine-pollution-act-1995/documents"}}