{"id":"tas:sr-2011-039","name":"Supreme Court Amendment (Miscellaneous) Rules (No. 2) 2011","slug":"supreme-court-amendment-miscellaneous-rules-no-2-2011","collection":"regulation","jurisdiction":"tas","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"39 of 2011","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":314624,"registerId":"tas-tas:sr-2011-039-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-08","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Short title","content":"### 1 Short title\n\n> These Rules of Court may be cited as the [Supreme Court Amendment (Miscellaneous) Rules (No. 2) 2011](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/sr-2011-039) .","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"2","sectionType":"section","heading":"Commencement","content":"### 2 Commencement\n\n> These Rules of Court take effect on the twenty-first day after the day on which their making is notified in the *Gazette*.","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"3","sectionType":"section","heading":"Principal Rules","content":"### 3 Principal Rules\n\n> In these Rules of Court, the [Supreme Court Rules 2000](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/sr-2000-008) are referred to as the Principal Rules.","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"4.","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### 4.\n\n> The amendment effected by this rule has been incorporated into the authorised version of the [Supreme Court Rules 2000](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/sr-2000-008) .","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"5.","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### 5.\n\n> The amendment effected by this rule has been incorporated into the authorised version of the [Supreme Court Rules 2000](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/sr-2000-008) .","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"6.","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### 6.\n\n> The amendments effected by this rule have been incorporated into the authorised version of the [Supreme Court Rules 2000](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/sr-2000-008) .","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"7.","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### 7.\n\n> The amendment effected by this rule has been incorporated into the authorised version of the [Supreme Court Rules 2000](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/sr-2000-008) .","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"8.","sectionType":"section","heading":null,"content":"### 8.\n\n> The amendment effected by this rule has been incorporated into the authorised version of the [Supreme Court Rules 2000](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/sr-2000-008) .\n\nE. C. CRAWFORD\n\nChief Justice\n\nP. E. EVANS\n\nPuisne Judge\n\nA. M. BLOW\n\nPuisne Judge\n\nS. E. TENNENT\n\nPuisne Judge\n\nD. J. PORTER\n\nPuisne Judge\n\nH. M. WOOD\n\nPuisne Judge\n\nCountersigned,\n\nE. A. KNIGHT\n\nRegistrar\n\nDisplayed and numbered in accordance with the *[Rules Publication Act 1953](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1953-050)*.\n\nNotified in the *Gazette* on 18 May 2011\n\nThese Rules of Court are administered in the Department of Justice.","sortOrder":7}],"analysis":{"summary":{"complexity_score":2,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"Based on available information, this appears to be a standard housekeeping amendment to court procedural rules with no evidence of scope expansion beyond its stated miscellaneous amendment purpose. It has remained in force unchanged since 8 June 2011."},"complexity_factors":["Amending instrument — requires cross-referencing with the principal Supreme Court Rules to understand what actually changed","Described as 'miscellaneous' suggesting multiple unrelated minor changes bundled together","Full text of amendments not available in the provided content, limiting analysis","Procedural rules can have technical legal implications despite appearing straightforward"],"plain_english_summary":"This instrument makes miscellaneous procedural amendments to the rules governing practice in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. It alters how documents are filed, cases are managed and parties must conduct themselves, so it directly affects lawyers, self-represented litigants and court registry staff.  \n\nIt matters because procedural changes can affect deadlines and filing requirements; the specific text of the amendments isn’t included here, so their precise impact can’t be assessed."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]},"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"Unauthenticated. Configure AI_GATEWAY_API_KEY or use a provider module. Learn more: https://ai-sdk.dev/unauthenticated-ai-gateway","source":"analysis-cron"},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":3,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The instrument amends procedural provisions of the Supreme Court Rules 2000 and records their incorporation into the authorised version; it does not, on its face, expand or contract the Court's substantive jurisdiction or introduce novel categories of persons affected. See rule 3 and rules 4–8 for the form of incorporation."},"complexity_factors":["Instrument is short and administrative but does not reproduce the substantive amendment text; it instead records incorporation into the Principal Rules (rules 4–8), requiring users to consult the consolidated authorised Rules to see actual changes.","Commencement delay: operation begins 21 days after Gazette notification, so timing and transitional compliance must be tracked (rule 2).","Cross-reference dependence: the instrument relies on the Supreme Court Rules 2000 as the Principal Rules (rule 3), so understanding effect requires navigating two documents.","Multiple incorporated amendments referenced collectively (rules 4–8) increase practical search cost to locate which parts of the Principal Rules were altered."],"plain_english_summary":"These Rules make miscellaneous amendments to the Supreme Court Rules 2000 and record that those amendments have been incorporated into the authorised (consolidated) version of the Principal Rules. They take effect 21 days after the date their making is notified in the Gazette (rule 2). This affects litigants, lawyers, court officers and the Registrar because procedural and filing rules governing Supreme Court practice have been changed; users must consult the updated authorised Rules to see the exact alterations."},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":1,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"This legislation maintains its original narrow purpose as a miscellaneous amendment instrument. The scope has not expanded beyond making specific technical amendments to court rules."},"complexity_factors":["Extremely short (8 rules, most containing no operative text)","No defined terms","No cross-references to other legislation (except naming the Principal Rules)","No conditional logic or exceptions","Rules 4-8 contain no substantive text—only a statement that amendments have been incorporated elsewhere"],"plain_english_summary":"This is a set of procedural rules that amend the Supreme Court Rules 2000 (Tasmania). It makes five separate technical changes to court procedures, but the actual content of those changes has already been merged into the main rules and is not shown here. This document essentially serves as a historical record that changes were made on 18 May 2011."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/supreme-court-amendment-miscellaneous-rules-no-2-2011","history":"/api/acts/supreme-court-amendment-miscellaneous-rules-no-2-2011/history","analysis":"/api/acts/supreme-court-amendment-miscellaneous-rules-no-2-2011/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/supreme-court-amendment-miscellaneous-rules-no-2-2011/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/supreme-court-amendment-miscellaneous-rules-no-2-2011/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/supreme-court-amendment-miscellaneous-rules-no-2-2011/documents"}}