{"id":"tas:sr-2021-005","name":"Strategic Infrastructure Corridors (Strategic and Recreational Use) (Transfer of Rail Infrastructure - South Corridor from Elwick Road to Mentmore Street) Notice 2021","slug":"strategic-infrastructure-corridors-strategic-and-recreational-use-transfer-of-rail-infrastructure-so","collection":"regulation","jurisdiction":"tas","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"5 of 2021","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":182227,"registerId":"tas-tas:sr-2021-005-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-05","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Short title","content":"### 1 Short title\n\n> This notice may be cited as the [Strategic Infrastructure Corridors (Strategic and Recreational Use) (Transfer of Rail Infrastructure - South Corridor from Elwick Road to Mentmore Street) Notice 2021](/view/html/inforce/2026-04-12/sr-2021-005) .","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"2","sectionType":"section","heading":"Commencement","content":"### 2 Commencement\n\n> This notice takes effect on 5 February 2021.","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"3","sectionType":"section","heading":"Transfer of rail infrastructure","content":"### 3 Transfer of rail infrastructure\n\n> All rail infrastructure that is situated on the corridor named the South Corridor from Elwick Road to Mentmore Street is transferred to the Crown.\n\nDisplayed and numbered in accordance with the *[Rules Publication Act 1953](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1953-050)*.\n\nNotified in the *Gazette* on 28 January 2021\n\nThis notice is administered in the Department of State Growth.","sortOrder":2}],"analysis":{"summary":{"complexity_score":2,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The notice appears to be a straightforward administrative instrument doing exactly what its title describes — transferring rail infrastructure for a defined corridor segment under an established legislative scheme. There is no indication of scope creep or deviation from the original intent of the enabling legislation."},"complexity_factors":["Very narrow and specific geographic scope (a single defined corridor segment)","Operates under an existing legislative framework, so the notice itself contains minimal operative text","Limited publicly available substantive content — the notice is largely administrative/procedural","No apparent cross-jurisdictional or multi-agency complexity visible in the available text"],"plain_english_summary":"## What This Law Does\n\nThis is a Tasmanian government notice (a type of delegated legislation — rules made under a broader Act rather than Parliament itself) that formally **transfers ownership or management of old rail infrastructure** along a specific stretch of track in Tasmania's south.\n\nSpecifically, it deals with the corridor running **from Elwick Road to Mentmore Street** — a section of former rail line in the greater Hobart area.\n\n## Who Does This Affect?\n\n- **Tasmanian government agencies** involved in managing former rail corridors\n- **Local communities** near the affected corridor, who may gain access to the area for recreational use (e.g. walking trails, cycling paths)\n- **Developers or planners** with an interest in land along this corridor\n- **TasRail or equivalent rail bodies** that previously managed this infrastructure\n\n## Why Does It Matter?\n\nTasmania has been progressively repurposing disused rail corridors for **strategic purposes** (like utilities or future transport) and **recreational use** (like shared walking and cycling paths). This notice is a formal step in that process — legally transferring responsibility for the rail infrastructure in this section so it can be managed under the *Strategic Infrastructure Corridors Act* framework.\n\nIn plain terms: **the old train tracks and associated land in this stretch are being handed over** so they can be used for community or strategic purposes rather than sitting unused."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[{"type":"other","section":"Status Information / Authorisation","severity":"low","reasoning":"While not strictly impossible, a legislative instrument whose underlying file was last modified before its own commencement date suggests either the commencement date was set prospectively without subsequent modification (which is normal drafting practice) or that the file metadata is inaccurate. It is mildly absurd that an instrument current from 5 February 2021 has not been modified since 28 January 2021, as one would expect at minimum a modification on or after commencement. This undermines confidence in the currency of the document.","confidence":0.55,"description":"The file is stated to have been last modified on 28 January 2021, yet the instrument's version is stated to be current from 5 February 2021. This creates a temporal inconsistency where the authoritative file predates its own commencement date by 8 days."},{"type":"other","section":"Title / Document Structure","severity":"medium","reasoning":"A legislative instrument that repeats its own title and section headings multiple times without any discernible substantive body creates a practical impossibility of compliance: there are no operative provisions, definitions, schedules, or transferring clauses visible. A Notice purporting to transfer rail infrastructure should contain at minimum: the property or corridor being transferred, the transferor, the transferee, and the operative transfer mechanism. None of these appear. If this represents the complete instrument, it is operationally void.","confidence":0.85,"description":"The title and all major headings are duplicated verbatim multiple times throughout the document, creating a structurally incoherent legislative instrument where it is impossible to distinguish substantive provisions from metadata or formatting artefacts."},{"type":"impossible_compliance","section":"Operative Provisions (absent)","severity":"high","reasoning":"A transfer notice without a transfer clause is a logical nullity. Any party seeking to rely on or comply with this instrument cannot determine what has been transferred, to whom, or from whom. This renders the instrument incapable of achieving its stated purpose. Under general principles of statutory interpretation and property law, a purported transfer of infrastructure with no operative mechanism has no legal effect, making the instrument self-defeating.","confidence":0.8,"description":"The instrument purports to transfer rail infrastructure along a named corridor (Elwick Road to Mentmore Street) but contains no operative transferring provision, no identification of transferor or transferee, no description of the property transferred, and no conditions or schedules."}],"contradictions":[{"severity":"low","section_a":"Currency of version (5 February 2021 to date)","section_b":"Authorisation (File last modified 28 January 2021)","confidence":0.5,"description":"The instrument is stated to have been in force from 5 February 2021, but the file was last modified on 28 January 2021, eight days before commencement. If the instrument commenced on 5 February 2021, the authoritative file should reflect a modification on or after that date to record commencement, yet it does not."}]},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":1,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"This notice performs exactly one function: transferring specific rail infrastructure to Crown ownership. It does not expand beyond the original purpose of the parent Act, which is to manage strategic infrastructure corridors."},"complexity_factors":["Extremely short: only 3 operative sections","No defined terms section","No cross-references to other legislation (except citation of the Rules Publication Act 1953 in the footer)","Single, unconditional operative provision with no exceptions or qualifications","No conditional logic or procedural requirements"],"plain_english_summary":"**What this does:**\nThis notice transfers ownership of railway infrastructure (tracks, signals, bridges, etc.) on a specific stretch of corridor in Tasmania — from Elwick Road to Mentmore Street, known as the \"South Corridor\" — to the Crown (the Tasmanian Government).\n\n**Who it affects:**\n- **Tasmanian Government:** Becomes the new owner of this rail infrastructure\n- **Previous owner:** Likely TasRail or another rail operator that previously held this infrastructure\n- **Local community:** The corridor is designated for both \"strategic\" (transport/freight) and \"recreational\" use, meaning it may be used for rail services and/or public walking/cycling paths\n\n**Why it matters:**\nThis is a technical land transfer that consolidates government control over a key transport corridor. The dual \"strategic and recreational use\" designation suggests the government is keeping options open — the corridor could remain active for rail freight, be converted to a shared path (like a rail trail), or serve both purposes. Transferring to Crown ownership simplifies management and future planning decisions.\n\n**Key detail:**\nThis is a **disallowable instrument** (a type of subordinate legislation) made under the *Strategic Infrastructure Corridors Act 2014* (Tas), which governs how Tasmania manages important transport routes."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/strategic-infrastructure-corridors-strategic-and-recreational-use-transfer-of-rail-infrastructure-so","history":"/api/acts/strategic-infrastructure-corridors-strategic-and-recreational-use-transfer-of-rail-infrastructure-so/history","analysis":"/api/acts/strategic-infrastructure-corridors-strategic-and-recreational-use-transfer-of-rail-infrastructure-so/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/strategic-infrastructure-corridors-strategic-and-recreational-use-transfer-of-rail-infrastructure-so/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/strategic-infrastructure-corridors-strategic-and-recreational-use-transfer-of-rail-infrastructure-so/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/strategic-infrastructure-corridors-strategic-and-recreational-use-transfer-of-rail-infrastructure-so/documents"}}