{"id":"F2020L00208","name":"Statement of Principles concerning chronic multisymptom illness (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 3 of 2020)","slug":"statement-of-principles-concerning-chronic-multisymptom-illness-reasonable-hypothesis-no-3-of-2020","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":440394,"registerId":"F2020L00208-fast-fetch-1775956037831","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-12","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Statement of Principles concerning chronic multisymptom illness (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 3 of 2020)","content":"---\nmeta-content-style-type: text/css\nmeta-content-type: application/xhtml+xml; charset=utf-8\nmeta-generator: Aspose.Words for .NET 20.2\n---\n\n?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\" standalone=\"no\"?>\n\n\n\n \n\nStatement of Principles\n\nconcerning\n\nCHRONIC MULTISYMPTOM ILLNESS (Reasonable Hypothesis)\n\n(No. 3 of 2020)\n\nThe Repatriation Medical Authority determines the following Statement of Principles under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986.\n\n \n\nDated 28 February 2020\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n| The Common Seal of the Repatriation Medical Authority was affixed to this instrument at the direction of:
|\n| --- |\n| 
Professor Nicholas Saunders AO
Chairperson
|\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\nContents\n\n1 Name\n\n2 Commencement\n\n3 Authority\n\n4 Repeal\n\n5 Application\n\n6 Definitions\n\n7 Kind of injury, disease or death to which this Statement of Principles relates\n\n8 Basis for determining the factors\n\n9 Factors that must exist\n\n10 Relationship to service\n\n11 Factors referring to an injury or disease covered by another Statement of Principles\n\nSchedule 1 - Dictionary\n\n1 Definitions\n\n \n\n\n\n\n1 Name\n\nThis is the Statement of Principles concerning chronic multisymptom illness (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 3 of 2020).\n\n2 Commencement\n\n This instrument commences on 23 March 2020.\n\n3 Authority\n\nThis instrument is made under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986.\n\n4 Repeal\n\nThe Statement of Principles concerning chronic multisymptom illness No. 55 of 2014 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2014L00524) made under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA is repealed.\n\nNote: The Statement of Principles concerning chronic multisymptom illness (No. 55 of 2014) was determined following an investigation concerning Gulf War syndrome which commenced on 31 October 2012. Although that investigation concerned the health of Gulf War veterans, the Statement of Principles concerning chronic multisymptom illness (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 3 of 2020) applies to all veterans and serving members with relevant service who have an illness which meets the definition.\n\n5 Application\n\nThis instrument applies to a claim to which section 120A of the VEA or section 338 of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 applies.\n\n6 Definitions\n\nThe terms defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary have the meaning given when used in this instrument.\n\n7 Kind of injury, disease or death to which this Statement of Principles relates\n\n(1) This Statement of Principles is about chronic multisymptom illness and death from chronic multisymptom illness.\n\nMeaning of chronic multisymptom illness\n\n(2) For the purposes of this Statement of Principles, chronic multisymptom illness means a condition characterised by multiple somatic symptoms which has been diagnosed by a specialist physician or a psychiatrist and which meets the following criteria:\n\n1. There are one or more current symptoms from two of the following three categories:\n\n\n(i) fatigue;\n\n(ii) mood-cognition: feeling depressed, difficulty remembering or concentrating, feeling moody, feeling anxious, trouble finding words or difficulty sleeping; or\n\n(iii) musculoskeletal: joint pain, joint stiffness or muscle pain; and\n\nB. The collection of symptoms relied upon to make the diagnosis is distressing and results in significant disruption of social and occupational functioning; and\n\nC. The collection of symptoms relied upon to make the diagnosis must have persisted for at least six consecutive months.\n\nDeath from chronic multisymptom illness\n\n(3) For the purposes of this Statement of Principles, chronic multisymptom illness, in relation to a person, includes death from a terminal event or condition that was contributed to by the person's chronic multisymptom illness.\n\nNote: terminal event is defined in the Schedule 1 – Dictionary.\n\n8 Basis for determining the factors\n\nThe Repatriation Medical Authority is of the view that there is sound medical‑scientific evidence that indicates that chronic multisymptom illness and death from chronic multisymptom illness can be related to relevant service rendered by veterans, members of Peacekeeping Forces, or members of the Forces under the VEA, or members under the MRCA.\n\nNote: MRCA, relevant service and VEA are defined in the Schedule 1 – Dictionary.\n\n9 Factors that must exist\n\nAt least one of the following factors must as a minimum exist before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting chronic multisymptom illness or death from chronic multisymptom illness with the circumstances of a person's relevant service:\n\n(1) living or working in a hostile or life-threatening environment for a period of at least 28 days in the six months before the clinical onset of chronic multisymptom illness;\n\nNote: hostile or life-threatening environment is defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary. \n\n(2) experiencing a category 1A stressor in the six months before the clinical onset of chronic multisymptom illness;\n\nNote: category 1A stressor is defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary. \n\n(3) experiencing a category 1B stressor in the six months before the clinical onset of chronic multisymptom illness;\n\nNote: category 1B stressor is defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary. \n\n(4) inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for chronic multisymptom illness.\n\n10 Relationship to service\n\n(1) The existence in a person of any factor referred to in section 9, must be related to the relevant service rendered by the person.\n\n(2) The factor set out in subsection 9(4) applies only to material contribution to, or aggravation of, chronic multisymptom illness where the person's chronic multisymptom illness was suffered or contracted before or during (but did not arise out of) the person's relevant service.\n\n11 Factors referring to an injury or disease covered by another Statement of Principles\n\nIn this Statement of Principles:\n\n(1) if a factor referred to in section 9 applies in relation to a person; and\n\n(2) that factor refers to an injury or disease in respect of which a Statement of Principles has been determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA;\n\nthen the factors in that Statement of Principles apply in accordance with the terms of that Statement of Principles as in force from time to time.\n\n \n\n \n\nSchedule 1 - Dictionary \n\nNote: See Section 6\n\n1 Definitions\n\nIn this instrument:\n\n category 1A stressor means one of the following severe traumatic events:\n\n(a) experiencing a life-threatening event;\n\n(b) being subject to a serious physical attack or assault including rape and sexual molestation; or\n\n(c) being threatened with a weapon, being held captive, being kidnapped or being tortured.\n\n category 1B stressor means one of the following severe traumatic events:\n\n(a) killing or maiming a person;\n\n(b) being an eyewitness to a person being killed or critically injured;\n\n(c) being an eyewitness to atrocities inflicted on another person;\n\n(d) participating in the clearance of a corpse or a critically injured casualty; or\n\n(e) viewing a corpse or a critically injured casualty as an eyewitness.\n\nNote: corpse and eyewitness are also defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary.\n\n chronic multisymptom illness—see subsection 7(2).\n\n corpse means the human remains or body parts of one or more persons who have met a violent or horrific death.\n\nNote: Examples of a violent or horrific death may include death due to suicide, gunshot, improvised explosive devices, natural and technological disasters, terrorist attacks or motor vehicle accidents. Seeing a closed body bag or viewing a body in an open-casket coffin are excluded from this definition.\n\n eyewitness means a person who experiences an incident first-hand and can give direct evidence of it. This excludes persons exposed only to public broadcasting or mass media coverage of the incident.\n\n hostile or life-threatening environment means a situation or setting which is characterised by a pervasive threat to life or bodily integrity, such as would be experienced in the following circumstances:\n\n(a) experiencing or being under threat of artillery, missile, rocket, mine or bomb attack; or\n\n(b) experiencing or being under threat of nuclear, biological or chemical agent attack; or\n\n(c) being involved in combat or going on combat patrols.\n\n MRCA means the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004.\n\n relevant service means:\n\n(a) operational service under the VEA;\n\n(b) peacekeeping service under the VEA;\n\n(c) hazardous service under the VEA;\n\n(d) British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;\n\n(e) warlike service under the MRCA; or\n\n(f) non-warlike service under the MRCA.\n\nNote: MRCA and VEA are also defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary.\n\n terminal event means the proximate or ultimate cause of death and includes the following:\n\n(a) pneumonia;\n\n(b) respiratory failure;\n\n(c) cardiac arrest;\n\n(d) circulatory failure; or\n\n(e) cessation of brain function.\n\n VEA means the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986.\n\n \n\n \n","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"Originally developed from a 2012 investigation specifically concerning Gulf War syndrome (as noted in section 4), this 2020 instrument explicitly expands coverage to 'all veterans and serving members with relevant service.' The scope broadened from a specific conflict-related condition to a general framework applicable across all operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike and non-warlike service types."},"complexity_factors":["Moderate length (approximately 1,500 words) with clear section numbering","12 defined terms in Schedule 1, including nested definitions (e.g., 'corpse' excludes closed body bags and open-casket viewings)","Cross-references to two separate Acts (VEA and MRCA) and incorporates their service definitions","Conditional logic in section 9 requiring at least one of four alternative factors to exist","Temporal limitation requiring factors to occur within 6 months before clinical onset","Specific exclusion clauses in definitions (eyewitness excludes mass media; corpse excludes certain viewing circumstances)","Section 10(2) contains a limited application clause restricting subsection 9(4) to aggravation cases only","Incorporation by reference of other Statements of Principles in section 11"],"plain_english_summary":"This instrument defines chronic multisymptom illness, sets medical criteria for diagnosis and impairment, and identifies service-related circumstances that can establish eligibility for compensation (e.g., exposure to hostile/hazardous environments, severe traumatic stressors, or lack of appropriate treatment in the relevant period). It applies to veterans and serving Defence members claiming under the VEA or MRCA and matters because it recognizes complex, hard-to-prove service-linked conditions without requiring identification of a specific causal agent."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":5,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"This instrument repeals the prior Statement of Principles No. 55 of 2014 (section 4) and, per the instrument note, extends application beyond the Gulf War cohort to all veterans and serving members with relevant service. It therefore broadens the population covered compared with the earlier Gulf‑War–centred investigation (section 4 note; section 5 applies it to claims under VEA s120A and MRCA s338)."},"complexity_factors":["Requires specialist diagnosis and symptom‑persistence threshold (diagnosis by a specialist physician or psychiatrist; symptoms persisted at least six consecutive months) (section 7(2) B–C).","Case definition is symptom‑based and demands symptoms from two of three categories (fatigue; mood‑cognition; musculoskeletal), creating medical judgment calls (section 7(2)1).","Evidentiary factors to raise a reasonable hypothesis are discrete and time‑limited: living/working ≥28 days in a hostile environment in the six months before clinical onset; experiencing category 1A or 1B stressors in the six months before onset; or inability to obtain appropriate clinical management (section 9; Schedule 1 definitions).","Service linkage requirement: any factor relied on must be related to the person's relevant service; the inability‑to‑access‑care factor is limited to material contribution or aggravation of a pre‑existing condition (section 10).","Interplay with other Statements of Principles and cross‑referencing to the VEA and MRCA creates layered legal interaction and potential overlap (section 11; section 5; Schedule definitions of VEA/MRCA/relevant service).","Operational definitions (hostile or life‑threatening environment; category 1A/1B stressors; eyewitness; corpse; terminal event) impose specific evidentiary inclusions and exclusions that affect proof strategies (Schedule 1).","Administrative and claimant burdens: proof often requires contemporaneous or corroborating evidence of service conditions, specialist reports, and temporal linkage to onset; the RMA issues the Statement under s196B(2) but adjudication occurs under VEA/MRCA claim processes (sections 3, 5).","Repeal and scope shift: repeal of the 2014 statement and explicit note broadening application beyond Gulf War‑specific claims affects which cohorts can rely on this Statement (section 4 and accompanying note)."],"plain_english_summary":"**What this instrument does:** Defines \"chronic multisymptom illness\", sets the medical criteria (specialist diagnosis, symptom groups, six‑month duration) and lists service‑linked factors that—if present and connected to a person's relevant service—raise a reasonable hypothesis that the condition is related to service. It applies to veterans and serving members claiming under the Veterans' Entitlements Act or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act and replaces an earlier Gulf‑War–focused statement."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-chronic-multisymptom-illness-reasonable-hypothesis-no-3-of-2020","history":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-chronic-multisymptom-illness-reasonable-hypothesis-no-3-of-2020/history","analysis":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-chronic-multisymptom-illness-reasonable-hypothesis-no-3-of-2020/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-chronic-multisymptom-illness-reasonable-hypothesis-no-3-of-2020/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-chronic-multisymptom-illness-reasonable-hypothesis-no-3-of-2020/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-chronic-multisymptom-illness-reasonable-hypothesis-no-3-of-2020/documents"}}