{"id":"F2018L00007","name":"Statement of Principles concerning cerebral meningioma (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 2 of 2018)","slug":"statement-of-principles-concerning-cerebral-meningioma-balance-of-probabilities-no-2-of-2018","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":439445,"registerId":"F2018L00007-fast-fetch-1775955469765","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-12","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Statement of Principles concerning cerebral meningioma (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 2 of 2018)","content":"---\nmeta-content-style-type: text/css\nmeta-content-type: application/xhtml+xml; charset=utf-8\nmeta-generator: Aspose.Words for .NET 22.10.0\n---\n\n?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\" standalone=\"no\"?>\n\n\n\n \n\nStatement of Principles\n\nconcerning\n\nCEREBRAL MENINGIOMA (Balance of Probabilities)\n\n(No. 2 of 2018)\n\nThe Repatriation Medical Authority determines the following Statement of Principles under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986.\n\n \n\nDated 22 December 2017\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n| The Common Seal of the Repatriation Medical Authority was affixed to this instrument at the direction of:
|\n| --- |\n| 
Professor Nicholas Saunders AO
Chairperson
|\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\nContents\n\n1 Name\n\n2 Commencement\n\n3 Authority\n\n4 Revocation\n\n5 Application\n\n6 Definitions\n\n7 Kind of injury, disease or death to which this Statement of Principles relates\n\n8 Basis for determining the factors\n\n9 Factors that must exist\n\n10 Relationship to service\n\n11 Factors referring to an injury or disease covered by another Statement of Principles\n\nSchedule 1 - Dictionary\n\n1 Definitions\n\n \n\n\n\n\n1 Name\n\nThis is the Statement of Principles concerning cerebral meningioma (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 2 of 2018).\n\n2 Commencement\n\n This instrument commences on 29 January 2018.\n\n3 Authority\n\nThis instrument is made under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986.\n\n4 Revocation\n\nThe Statement of Principles concerning cerebral meningioma No. 20 of 2009, as amended, made under subsections 196B(3) and (8) of the VEA is revoked.\n\n5 Application\n\nThis instrument applies to a claim to which section 120B of the VEA or section 339 of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 applies.\n\n6 Definitions\n\nThe terms defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary have the meaning given when used in this instrument.\n\n7 Kind of injury, disease or death to which this Statement of Principles relates\n\n(1) This Statement of Principles is about cerebral meningioma and death from cerebral meningioma.\n\nMeaning of cerebral meningioma\n\n(2) For the purposes of this Statement of Principles, cerebral meningioma means a primary benign or intermediate grade tumour of the cerebral meninges.\n\n(3) While cerebral meningioma attracts ICD‑10‑AM code D32.0 or D32.9, in applying this Statement of Principles the meaning of cerebral meningioma is that given in subsection (2).\n\n(4) For subsection (3), a reference to an ICD-10-AM code is a reference to the code assigned to a particular kind of injury or disease in The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM), Tenth Edition, effective date of 1 July 2017, copyrighted by the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority, ISBN 978-1-76007-296-4.\n\nDeath from cerebral meningioma\n\n(5) For the purposes of this Statement of Principles, cerebral meningioma, in relation to a person, includes death from a terminal event or condition that was contributed to by the person's cerebral meningioma.\n\nNote: terminal event is defined in the Schedule 1 – Dictionary.\n\n8 Basis for determining the factors\n\nOn the sound medical‑scientific evidence available, the Repatriation Medical Authority is of the view that it is more probable than not that cerebral meningioma and death from cerebral meningioma can be related to relevant service rendered by veterans or members of the Forces under the VEA, or members under the MRCA.\n\nNote: MRCA, relevant service and VEA are defined in the Schedule 1 – Dictionary.\n\n9 Factors that must exist\n\nAt least one of the following factors must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, cerebral meningioma or death from cerebral meningioma is connected with the circumstances of a person's relevant service:\n\n(1) having received a cumulative equivalent dose of at least 0.5 sievert of ionising radiation to the brain at least ten years before the clinical onset of cerebral meningioma;\n\nNote: cumulative equivalent dose is defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary. \n\n(2) being obese for at least ten years within the 20 years before the clinical onset of cerebral meningioma;\n\nNote: being obese is defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary. \n\n(3) being in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, or within the 30 days postpartum, at the time of the clinical onset of cerebral meningioma;\n\n(4) being treated daily with cyproterone acetate at a dose rate of at least 15 milligrams per day for a continuous period of at least one year, within the ten years before the clinical onset of cerebral meningioma;\n\n(5) being in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, or within the 30 days postpartum, at the time of the clinical worsening of cerebral meningioma;\n\n(6) being treated daily with cyproterone acetate at a dose rate of at least 15 milligrams per day for a continuous period of at least one year, within the ten years before the clinical worsening of cerebral meningioma;\n\n(7) inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for cerebral meningioma.\n\n10 Relationship to service\n\n(1) The existence in a person of any factor referred to in section 9, must be related to the relevant service rendered by the person.\n\n(2) The factors set out in subsections 9(5) to 9(7) apply only to material contribution to, or aggravation of, cerebral meningioma where the person's cerebral meningioma was suffered or contracted before or during (but did not arise out of) the person's relevant service.\n\n11 Factors referring to an injury or disease covered by another Statement of Principles\n\nIn this Statement of Principles:\n\n(1) if a factor referred to in section 9 applies in relation to a person; and\n\n(2) that factor refers to an injury or disease in respect of which a Statement of Principles has been determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA;\n\nthen the factors in that Statement of Principles apply in accordance with the terms of that Statement of Principles as in force from time to time.\n\n \n\n \n\nSchedule 1 - Dictionary \n\nNote: See Section 6\n\n1 Definitions\n\nIn this instrument:\n\n being obese means having a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or greater.\n\nNote: BMI is also defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary.\n\n BMI means W/H2 where:\n\nW is the person's weight in kilograms; and\n\nH is the person's height in metres.\n\n cerebral meningioma—see subsection 7(2).\n\n cumulative equivalent dose means the total dose of ionising radiation received by the particular organ or tissue from external exposure, internal exposure or both, apart from normal background radiation exposure in Australia, calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Guide to calculation of 'cumulative equivalent dose' for the purpose of applying ionising radiation factors contained in Statements of Principles determined under Part XIA of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, as in force on 2 August 2017.\n\nNote 1: Examples of circumstances that might lead to exposure to ionising radiation include being present during or subsequent to the testing or use of nuclear weapons, undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic medical procedures involving ionising radiation, and being a member of an aircrew, leading to increased levels of exposure to cosmic radiation.\n\nNote 2: For the purpose of dose reconstruction, dose is calculated as an average over the mass of a specific tissue or organ. If a tissue is exposed to multiple sources of ionising radiation, the various dose estimates for each type of radiation must be combined.\n\n MRCA means the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004.\n\n relevant service means:\n\n(a) eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;\n\n(b) defence service (other than hazardous service and British nuclear test defence service) under the VEA; or\n\n(c) peacetime service under the MRCA.\n\nNote: MRCA and VEA are also defined in the Schedule 1 - Dictionary.\n\n terminal event means the proximate or ultimate cause of death and includes the following:\n\n(a) pneumonia;\n\n(b) respiratory failure;\n\n(c) cardiac arrest;\n\n(d) circulatory failure; or\n\n(e) cessation of brain function.\n\n VEA means the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986.\n\n \n","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"This is a straightforward replacement instrument updating medical evidence for a specific condition. It maintains the same scope as its 2009 predecessor — establishing causation factors for cerebral meningioma claims under the veterans' compensation scheme. No scope creep is evident; it does not expand to cover new conditions, new claimant classes, or new compensation schemes."},"complexity_factors":["Moderate cross-referencing: 7 defined terms in Schedule 1, with some terms (BMI, cerebral meningioma, cumulative equivalent dose) requiring nested definitions or external methodology references","Conditional logic with temporal requirements: 6 of the 7 factors include specific time windows ('at least ten years before', 'within the 20 years before', 'within the ten years before')","Dual application structure: factors apply differently to 'clinical onset' versus 'clinical worsening', with section 10(2) creating a limited subset (factors 5-7) that only apply to pre-existing conditions aggravated by service","External document incorporation: cumulative equivalent dose definition references a specific ARPANSA guide with a fixed 'as in force' date (2 August 2017)","ICD-10-AM coding reference with specific edition locking (Tenth Edition, effective 1 July 2017) including ISBN number","Service category exclusions: 'relevant service' is defined by explicitly excluding operational service, hazardous service, and British nuclear test defence service, requiring knowledge of other service categories"],"plain_english_summary":"This instrument updates the medical test for compensation for cerebral meningioma, replacing the 2009 guidance and requiring veterans or defence members to prove on the balance of probabilities that the tumour is linked to their non‑operational or peacetime service (operational/hazardous service is excluded). \n\nIt sets narrow, evidence‑based causal criteria — including substantial radiation, long‑term obesity, pregnancy timing, certain hormone treatment, or lack of adequate care — with strict thresholds; failure to meet one of these criteria will likely bar a claim."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"This instrument replaces (revokes) the earlier Statement of Principles No. 20 of 2009 (s4) and applies to the same statutory claim streams under the VEA and MRCA (s5). The text does not state that the statutory scope of who may apply has changed; it specifies updated qualifying factors and definitions instead."},"complexity_factors":["Technical medical definition of cerebral meningioma and mapping to ICD‑10‑AM codes (s7(2)–(4)).","Use of a quantitative radiation threshold (≥0.5 sievert) and reliance on an external dose‑reconstruction methodology (s9(1); Schedule: cumulative equivalent dose and Guide reference).","Multiple temporal requirements and latency windows (e.g. 10 years before clinical onset, 10‑year exposure lookback, 20‑year BMI window) across different factors (s9(1)–(6)).","Inclusion of both objective (dose, BMI, prescribed medication dose/duration) and subjective/systemic factors (inability to obtain appropriate clinical management) requiring factual assessment (s9(1)–(7); s10(1)–(2)).","Interplay with other Statements of Principles where a factor overlaps an injury/disease governed elsewhere (s11), creating cross‑instrument application and potential consistency issues.","Statutory application to two different compensation schemes (VEA and MRCA) and revocation of the prior instrument, requiring administrative transition (s3–s5; s4)."],"plain_english_summary":"This Statement of Principles sets out when cerebral meningioma (a primary benign or intermediate tumour of the cerebral meninges) is treated as connected with a person’s relevant service for claims under the VEA or MRCA. It lists specific qualifying factors—such as a cumulative brain ionising radiation dose ≥0.5 sievert (with a 10‑year latency), long‑term obesity, pregnancy timing, prolonged cyproterone acetate use, or inability to obtain appropriate clinical management—and requires those factors be related to the person’s service."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-cerebral-meningioma-balance-of-probabilities-no-2-of-2018","history":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-cerebral-meningioma-balance-of-probabilities-no-2-of-2018/history","analysis":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-cerebral-meningioma-balance-of-probabilities-no-2-of-2018/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-cerebral-meningioma-balance-of-probabilities-no-2-of-2018/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-cerebral-meningioma-balance-of-probabilities-no-2-of-2018/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/statement-of-principles-concerning-cerebral-meningioma-balance-of-probabilities-no-2-of-2018/documents"}}