{"id":"restraint-of-debtors-act-1984","name":"Restraint of Debtors Act 1984","slug":"restraint-of-debtors-act-1984","collection":"act","jurisdiction":"wa","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":106634,"registerId":"wa-restraint-of-debtors-act-1984-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-03","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Restraint of Debtors Act 1984","content":"![Crest]()Western Australia\n\nRestraint of Debtors Act 1984\n\nWestern Australia\n\nRestraint of Debtors Act 1984\n\nContents\n\nPart I — Preliminary\n\n1. Short title 2\n\n2. Commencement 2\n\n3. Interpretation 2\n\nPart II — Absconding debtors\n\n5. Application for warrant 5\n\n6. Issue of warrant or summons 6\n\n7. Warrant where default on summons anticipated 6\n\n8. Transmission of warrant or summons to court 7\n\n9. Service of summons 7\n\n10. Appearance upon summons may be avoided 7\n\n11. Execution of warrant 8\n\n12. Arrested debtor brought before court 9\n\n13. Release of arrested debtor 9\n\n14. Preliminary hearing 10\n\n15. Failure to appear upon summons 11\n\n16. Failure to comply with conditions 11\n\nPart III — Restraint on transfer or removal of property\n\n17. Application for restraining order 13\n\n18. Hearing of application 14\n\n19. Making of restraining order 14\n\nPart IV — Consent jurisdiction\n\n20. Determination of claim 15\n\nPart V — Review\n\n21. Application for review 16\n\n22. Review 16\n\n23. Further proceedings restrained 17\n\n24. Appeals under other Acts excluded 18\n\nPart VI — Miscellaneous\n\n25. Protection 19\n\n26. Improper applications 19\n\n27. Special civil remedy 20\n\n28. Procedure 20\n\n29. Savings 21\n\n30. Regulations 21\n\nNotes\n\nCompilation table 22\n\nDefined terms\n\n  \n\nWestern Australia\n\nRestraint of Debtors Act 1984\n\nAn Act to make provision for and in respect of the protection of creditors in certain circumstances and to repeal the *Absconding Debtors Act 1877* 2*.*\n\n## Part I — Preliminary\n\n##### 1. Short title\n\nThis Act may be cited as the *Restraint of Debtors Act 1984* 1.\n\n##### 2. Commencement\n\nThis Act shall come into operation on a day to be fixed by proclamation 1.\n\n##### 3. Interpretation\n\n(1) In this Act, unless the contrary intention appears —\n\n  applicant means a person applying for an order or warrant under this Act;\n\n  debt means any sum of money, whether liquidated or not and whether pursuant to an order or judgment or otherwise, that is due and legally recoverable in the State or for which a person has a cause of action in the State, and indebted has a corresponding meaning;\n\n  debtor means —\n\n(a) in relation to proceedings under Part II, a natural person who an applicant alleges is indebted to the applicant; and\n\n(b) in relation to proceedings under Part III, a person, whether a natural person or a body corporate, who or which an applicant alleges is indebted to the applicant;\n\n  judicial officer means —\n\n(a) in relation to the Supreme Court, a Judge, a Master, the Principal Registrar, or a Registrar of the Supreme Court duly appointed under the *Supreme Court Act 1935* or a duly appointed acting Judge, auxiliary Judge, acting Master, acting Principal Registrar, or acting or Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court;\n\n(b) in relation to the District Court, a Judge, acting Judge or auxiliary Judge of that court or —\n\n(i) where that court sits at Perth, the Registrar of that court;\n\n(ii) where that court sits at any place other than Perth, the Deputy Registrar of that court sitting at that other place;\n\n  property means real or personal property and includes any legal or equitable interest in such property.\n\n(2) A reference in this Act to the transfer of property includes a reference to the sale, or the assignment otherwise than for valuable consideration, of that property.\n\n(3) For the purposes of Part II, a person or a court, as the case may be, is satisfied as to all material matters in relation to an application concerning a debtor if he or it is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that —\n\n(a) the debtor is indebted to the applicant;\n\n(b) the debtor is about to leave the State;\n\n(c) the absence of the debtor from the State would defeat, endanger, or materially prejudice the prosecution of the claimant's cause of action or the prospects of enforcing a judgment;\n\n(d) the alleged debt is for an amount not less than $500 or such greater amount as may be prescribed; and\n\n(e) the application has been made within a reasonable time after the circumstances relied on as evidence of the debtor's intention to leave the State came to the knowledge of the applicant.\n\n(4) For the purposes of Part III, a court is satisfied as to all material matters in relation to an application concerning a debtor if it is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that —\n\n(a) the debtor is indebted to the applicant;\n\n(b) the debtor has property situated in the State;\n\n(c) property of the debtor is about to be —\n\n(i) transferred; or\n\n(ii) removed from the State;\n\n(d) transfer of, or removal from the State of, the property would defeat, endanger, or materially prejudice the prosecution of the claimant's cause of action or the prospects of enforcing a judgment;\n\n(e) the alleged debt is for an amount that is not less than $500 or such greater amount as may be prescribed; and\n\n(f) the application has been made within a reasonable time after the circumstances relied on as evidence of the impending transfer or removal from the State of property came to the knowledge of the applicant.\n\n[Section 3 amended: No. 23 of 1997 s. 18.]\n\n[**4.** Deleted: No. 28 of 2003 s. 126(2).]\n\n## Part II — Absconding debtors\n\n##### 5. Application for warrant\n\n(1) Subject to this Act, a person may, at any time, for the purpose of preventing a debtor from leaving the State, apply —\n\n(a) where proceedings in respect of the debt to which the application relates have been commenced in the Supreme Court or District Court, to a judicial officer of that court or to any magistrate or justice;\n\n(b) in any other case, to any magistrate or justice,\n\nfor a warrant to issue for the arrest of the debtor.\n\n(2) An application under subsection (1) shall be —\n\n(a) in the prescribed form; and\n\n(b) supported by an affidavit.\n\n(i) as to all material matters in relation to which the person to whom the application is made is required by section 6 to be satisfied before issuing a warrant or summons under that section;\n\n(ii) as to whether any previous application has been made under this section or section 17 in respect of the same debtor in relation to the same debt;\n\n(iii) as to whether any other application has, within the period of one year last preceding the making of the application for which the affidavit is required, been made under this section or section 17 in respect of the same debtor in relation to any other debt; and\n\n(iv) where any application as referred to in subparagraph (iii) has been made setting out details of the debt concerned, the outcome of the application, and such other particulars, if any, as may be prescribed.\n\n##### 6. Issue of warrant or summons\n\n(1) A person to whom an application is made under section 5(1) for a warrant to issue may, if he is satisfied as to all material matters —\n\n(a) issue a warrant directed to a non‑commissioned officer or constable of the Police Force for the debtor named in the application to be arrested and brought before the court specified in the warrant; or\n\n(b) issue a summons addressed to the debtor named in the application requiring him to appear before the court specified in the summons at a time and place so specified.\n\n(2) A warrant or summons issued under subsection (1) shall be in the prescribed form, shall specify the amount of the alleged debt and the costs, if any, that are claimed by the applicant, and shall bear such other endorsements, if any, as are prescribed.\n\n(3) The court specified in a warrant or summons issued under subsection (1) shall be the Supreme Court, the District Court, or the Magistrates Court.\n\n[Section 6 amended: No. 59 of 2004 s. 141.]\n\n##### 7. Warrant where default on summons anticipated\n\n(1) Where upon an application under section 5(1) a summons is issued requiring the debtor to appear before a court specified in the summons at a time so specified and before the time so specified the applicant has reasonable grounds for believing that the debtor is unlikely to appear in accordance with the summons, he may make a further application to any person to whom an application may be made under section 5(1) for a warrant to issue for the arrest of the debtor.\n\n(2) A person to whom an application is made under subsection (1) may, if he is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for the applicant's belief that the debtor is unlikely to appear in accordance with the summons, issue a warrant directed to a non‑commissioned officer or constable of the Police Force for the debtor to be arrested and brought before the court specified in the warrant, being a court referred to in section 6(3).\n\n##### 8. Transmission of warrant or summons to court\n\n(1) A person who issues a warrant or summons under section 6 shall cause to be transmitted to the registry of the court before which the debtor is to be brought or is required to appear —\n\n(a) the application under section 5(1);\n\n(b) the affidavit or, if there be more than one, every affidavit in support of the application under section 5(1); and\n\n(c) a copy of the warrant or summons so issued.\n\n(2) A person who issues a warrant under section 7 shall cause a copy of the warrant so issued to be transmitted to the registry of the court before which the debtor is to be brought.\n\n##### 9. Service of summons\n\nA summons issued under section 6 shall be served personally on the debtor named in the summons not less than 7 days before the day on which he is summoned to appear, and shall be accompanied by a copy of —\n\n(a) the application upon which the summons was issued; and\n\n(b) the affidavit or, if there be more than one, every affidavit in support of the application.\n\n##### 10. Appearance upon summons may be avoided\n\n(1) A debtor who has, in accordance with section 9, been served with a summons issued under section 6 is not required to appear as specified in the summons if, before the time so specified for his appearance, he —\n\n(a) tenders to the applicant, in a form acceptable to the applicant, the amount of money specified in the summons as the alleged debt and costs;\n\n(b) gives security, either with or without surety, to the satisfaction of the applicant for the payment of the amount of money so specified; or\n\n(c) deposits with the court before which he is required to so appear the amount of money so specified, to abide the determination of the claim.\n\n(2) Where, under subsection (1), a debtor tenders or deposits, or gives security for the payment of, the amount of money specified in a summons issued under section 6 and any notice thereof required by the regulations to be given to the court has been given, a warrant shall not be issued under section 7 or 15 in relation to that summons.\n\n##### 11. Execution of warrant\n\n(1) A warrant issued under section 6, 7, or 15 may be executed in the State by a non‑commissioned officer or constable of the Police Force within one month from the day on which the warrant was issued.\n\n(2) A person executing a warrant referred to in subsection (1) shall —\n\n(a) at the time of, or as soon as practicable after, executing the warrant, serve the debtor with —\n\n(i) a copy of the warrant; and\n\n(ii) where the warrant was issued under section 6 or 7, a copy of the application upon which the warrant was issued and any affidavit in support of the application;\n\n(b) endorse on the warrant the time and place at which the warrant was executed; and\n\n(c) forthwith take the debtor to the nearest police station.\n\n(3) A person upon whose application a warrant is issued under section 6, 7, or 15 shall pay in respect of the execution or attempted execution of that warrant such fee as is prescribed by the regulations and the amount of any fee so payable may be recovered from that person in a court of competent jurisdiction as a debt due to the Crown.\n\n##### 12. Arrested debtor brought before court\n\nThe officer in charge of a police station to which a debtor is brought in accordance with section 11(2)(c) shall —\n\n(a) hold the debtor in custody; and\n\n(b) except where he releases the debtor from custody under section 13(a) or (b), cause the debtor to be brought before the court specified for that purpose in the warrant within 24 hours of receiving the debtor into custody, or as soon after the expiry of that period as is practicable.\n\n##### 13. Release of arrested debtor\n\nAn officer in charge of a police station who is holding a debtor in custody under section 12 shall release the debtor from custody if —\n\n(a) the debtor —\n\n(i) tenders to the applicant, in a form acceptable to the applicant, the amount of money specified in the warrant as the alleged debt and costs;\n\n(ii) gives security, either with or without surety, to the satisfaction of the applicant for the payment of the amount of money so specified; or\n\n(iii) pays to the officer so in charge for deposit with the court specified in the warrant the amount of money so specified, to abide the determination of the claim;\n\n(b) the applicant consents in writing to the release of the debtor; or\n\n(c) an order is made under section 14 or Part V for the release of the debtor.\n\n##### 14. Preliminary hearing\n\n(1) Subject to subsection (2), the court before which a debtor is brought in accordance with a warrant issued under section 6, 7, or 15 or before which a debtor appears in answer to a summons issued under section 6 may make such order as it thinks fit including an order —\n\n(a) that, where the debtor is in custody, the debtor be released, either conditionally or unconditionally, from custody;\n\n(b) that the debtor undertake in writing, in a form approved by the court, that he will not leave the State until a specified amount of money is paid;\n\n(c) that the debtor give security, either with or without surety, for the payment of a specified amount of money;\n\n(d) that the debtor deposit a specified amount of money with the court to abide the determination of the claim;\n\n(e) that the debtor surrender any ticket, passport, or other document to the court;\n\n(f) that, within such time and in such manner as is specified, the applicant take such action for the recovery of the alleged debt as is specified; and\n\n(g) as to costs.\n\n(2) If the court before which a debtor is brought as referred to in subsection (1) is not satisfied as to all material matters it shall order that the debtor be released, either conditionally or unconditionally, from custody.\n\n(3) In subsection (1) specified, in relation to an order, means specified by the court making the order.\n\n##### 15. Failure to appear upon summons\n\nWhere a debtor who has, in accordance with section 9, been served with a summons issued under section 6 does not appear before the court specified in the summons at the time and place so specified, the person upon whose application the summons was issued may apply for and the court may, upon being satisfied that service was so effected, issue a warrant directed to a non‑commissioned officer or constable of the Police Force for the debtor to be arrested and brought before the court as soon as practicable after his arrest.\n\n##### 16. Failure to comply with conditions\n\n(1) A member of the Police Force may, without a warrant —\n\n(a) arrest a debtor who is conditionally released from custody pursuant to an order under section 14 or Part V if the member of the Police Force reasonably suspects that the debtor has failed, or is about to fail, to comply with a condition subject to which he was so released from custody;\n\n(b) arrest a debtor who, pursuant to an order under section 14(1)(b) or Part V, has given an undertaking that he will not leave the State until a specified amount of money is paid, if the member of the Police Force reasonably suspects that the debtor has breached, or is about to breach, that undertaking.\n\n(2) A member of the Police Force who arrests a debtor under subsection (1) shall, within 24 hours of the arrest of the debtor, or as soon after the expiry of that period as is practicable, bring the debtor before the court that ordered his release from custody or ordered him to give the undertaking, as the case may be.\n\n(3) The court before which a debtor is brought under subsection (2) may —\n\n(a) revoke an order pursuant to which the debtor was released if it is satisfied that the debtor has failed, or was or is about to fail, to comply with a condition of the order; and\n\n(b) make such order as it sees fit including any order that could have been made under section 14(1) when the debtor was brought before or appeared before, that court as referred to in that provision.\n\n(4) Where, under subsection (3), a court revokes an order pursuant to which a debtor was released, the debtor is, by force of the order of revocation, committed to police custody and shall thereafter be held in custody as if the order for the debtor's release had not been made.\n\n## Part III — Restraint on transfer or removal of property\n\n##### 17. Application for restraining order\n\n(1) Subject to this Act, a person may, at any time, apply for an order restraining —\n\n(a) the transfer of any of the property of a debtor that is situated in the State; or\n\n(b) the removal from the State of any of the property of a debtor that is situated in the State.\n\n(2) An application under subsection (1) may be made —\n\n(a) where proceedings in respect of the alleged debt to which the application relates have been commenced in any court referred to in section 6(3), to that court;\n\n(b) in any other case, to any such court in which proceedings might be commenced in respect of the alleged debt to which the application relates.\n\n(3) An application under subsection (1) shall be —\n\n(a) in the prescribed form; and\n\n(b) supported by an affidavit —\n\n(i) as to all material matters in relation to which the court to which the application is made is required by section 19(2) to be satisfied before making an order under section 19(1);\n\n(ii) as to whether any previous application has been made under section 5 or this section in respect of the same debtor in relation to the same debt;\n\n(iii) as to whether any other application has, within the period of one year last preceding the making of the application for which the affidavit is required, been made under section 5 or this section in respect of the same debtor in relation to any other debt; and\n\n(iv) where any application as referred to in subparagraph (iii) has been made, setting out details of the debt concerned, the outcome of the application, and such other particulars, if any, as may be prescribed.\n\n##### 18. Hearing of application\n\n(1) Subject to subsection (3), an application under section 17 may be heard and determined *ex parte*.\n\n(2) The court hearing an application under section 17 may order that —\n\n(a) the applicant take such steps as the court sees fit to ascertain the ownership of property in respect of which an order is sought; and\n\n(b) the applicant serve or cause to be served on the debtor or any other person —\n\n(i) a copy of the application and any affidavit in support of the application; or\n\n(ii) notice of the application.\n\n(3) A person other than the debtor who has an interest in property in respect of which an order is sought may, whether or not he has been served with a copy of, or given notice of, the application, take part in the proceedings as a party thereto.\n\n##### 19. Making of restraining order\n\n(1) Upon an application made under section 17 the court to which the application is made may make such order as it sees fit, which may include an order as to costs.\n\n(2) An order restraining the transfer or removal from the State of property shall not be made under subsection (1) unless the court making the order is satisfied as to all material matters.\n\n## Part IV — Consent jurisdiction\n\n##### 20. Determination of claim\n\n(1) Where the court before which a debtor is brought in accordance with a warrant issued under this Act or appears in answer to a summons issued under section 6, or the court to which an application is made under section 17, in relation to an alleged debt is not a court of competent jurisdiction for the recovery of the alleged debt, the court may —\n\n(a) with the consent of the debtor and the applicant, hear and determine the claim for the alleged debt as if the proceedings under this Act were proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction for the recovery of the alleged debt;\n\n(b) decline to hear and determine any claim under paragraph (a) or, having commenced to hear any claim under that paragraph, decline to further hear and determine the claim;\n\n(c) in respect of the hearing under this Part of a claim, or any part of a claim, make such order as to costs as it sees fit.\n\n(2) A court having jurisdiction under subsection (1) to hear and determine a claim may make such orders as it sees fit to enable the matter to be continued and disposed of as proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction.\n\n(3) A decision of a court in proceedings under this section has effect and may be enforced as a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction.\n\n## Part V — Review\n\n##### 21. Application for review\n\n(1) An applicant, debtor, or other person who is a party to proceedings under this Act may apply for an order —\n\n(a) that a warrant or summons issued under this Act be varied or set aside;\n\n(b) that an order made in proceedings under this Act be varied or quashed; or\n\n(c) where the debtor is in custody under this Act, that the debtor be released from custody,\n\nor for any order sought in proceedings under this Act that the court hearing those proceedings declined to make.\n\n(2) An application under subsection (1) for an order —\n\n(a) that a warrant or summons issued under this Act be varied or set aside; or\n\n(b) that a debtor who has been arrested pursuant to a warrant issued under this Act be released from custody,\n\nmay be made to the person who issued the warrant or summons or to the Supreme Court.\n\n(3) An application under subsection (1) other than an application to which subsection (2) applies may be made to the court that made or declined to make the order concerned, as the case may be, or to the Supreme Court.\n\n(4) A person aggrieved by a decision or order made other than by the Supreme Court upon the hearing of an application under subsection (1) may apply to the Supreme Court for the review of that decision or order.\n\n##### 22. Review\n\n(1) Where an application is made under section 21 the person to whom or the court to which the application is made has jurisdiction to hear and determine the application and may make such order as he or it sees fit, which may include an order as to costs.\n\n(2) An order made under subsection (1) shall have effect according to its tenor and where an order is so made as to costs other than by a court, it may be lodged in the Magistrates Court and enforced as an order of that court.\n\n(3) An application made under section 21 to the Supreme Court shall be heard by a single Judge sitting in chambers.\n\n[Section 22 amended: No. 59 of 2004 s. 141.]\n\n##### 23. Further proceedings restrained\n\nWhere under this Act a summons or warrant is issued or an order is made in proceedings relating to a debt and under section 22 the summons or warrant is set aside or the order is varied or quashed, the person who instituted the proceedings shall not, within 6 months of the setting aside of the warrant or summons or varying or quashing of the order, as the case may be, make any further application under Part II or Part III that relates to the same debtor and to the same debt, or any part thereof, unless —\n\n(a) the applicant introduces further information in support of the application that was not, and could not reasonably have been, introduced at the time when the warrant or summons was set aside or the order was varied or quashed; or\n\n(b) the person who or court that set aside the warrant or summons or varied or quashed the order, having regard to the merits of the case, gives the applicant leave to make such further application within that time.\n\n##### 24. Appeals under other Acts excluded\n\nWhere this Act provides for the review of a matter proceedings in the nature of an appeal shall not be instituted in respect of that matter under any other Act.\n\n## Part VI — Miscellaneous\n\n##### 25. Protection\n\nA member of the Police Force or other person on whom a power is conferred or duty is imposed under this Act is not personally liable in civil proceedings, and the Crown is not liable, for any act done or default made by him in good faith for the purpose, or purportedly for the purpose, of carrying this Act into effect.\n\n##### 26. Improper applications\n\nA person shall not make any application under section 5, 7 or 17 if —\n\n(a) the applicant has reasonable cause to believe that —\n\n(i) he does not have a cause of action for the alleged debt that is recognized by the law; or\n\n(ii) the amount likely to be recovered in the action is less than $500 or such greater amount as may be prescribed;\n\n(b) in the case of an application under section 5, the applicant has no reasonable cause to believe that —\n\n(i) the debtor intends to leave the State; and\n\n(ii) the absence of the debtor from the State would defeat, endanger, or materially prejudice the prosecution of the claimant’s cause of action or the prospects of enforcing a judgment;\n\nor\n\n(c) the application has not been made within a reasonable time after the circumstances relied on as evidence of —\n\n(i) in the case of an application under section 5, the debtor's intention to leave the State;\n\n(ii) in the case of an application under section 17, the impending transfer or removal from the State of property,\n\ncame to the knowledge of the applicant.\n\nPenalty: $2 000.\n\n##### 27. Special civil remedy\n\n(1) Where a person makes an application under this Act without reasonable cause or contrary to any provision of this Act, the debtor shall be entitled to recover from that person in a court of competent jurisdiction —\n\n(a) any expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the debtor as a result of the making of the application; and\n\n(b) any moneys outlaid by the debtor before he became aware of the making of the application where —\n\n(i) the purpose for which the moneys were outlaid is, as a result of the making of the application, defeated; and\n\n(ii) the moneys outlaid are not legally recoverable by the debtor.\n\n(2) The remedy provided by subsection (1) does not restrict, limit or otherwise affect any other remedy that the debtor may have against any person.\n\n##### 28. Procedure\n\nSubject to this Act and to any order or direction of the court to which an application is made under this Act, the practice and procedure to be adopted for proceedings under this Act shall, in so far as is practicable, be as are generally applicable to proceedings in that court or as may otherwise be prescribed in the rules of court.\n\n##### 29. Savings\n\nNothing in this Act restricts, limits, or otherwise affects —\n\n(a) any other jurisdiction or powers of any court or person; or\n\n(b) any other remedy a person may have against a debtor.\n\n##### 30. Regulations\n\nThe Governor may make regulations prescribing all matters that are required or permitted by this Act to be prescribed, or are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for giving effect to the purposes of this Act and in particular —\n\n(a) prescribing the circumstances in which and the person to whom a court with which money is deposited in accordance with an order of the court or under section 10(1)(c) or 13(a)(iii) shall pay out money so deposited;\n\n(b) providing for a court before which a debtor has been summoned to appear to be notified where, before the time specified for his appearance, the debtor tenders, or gives security for the payment of, the amount of money specified in the summons as the alleged debt and costs;\n\n(c) creating offences against those regulations and prescribing penalties not exceeding $200 in respect of those offences.\n\n[**31**. Omitted under the Reprints Act 1984 s. 7(4)(f).]\n\nNotes\n\n1 This is a compilation of the *Restraint of Debtors Act 1984* and includes the amendments made by the other written laws referred to in the following table. The table also contains information about any reprint.\n\nCompilation table\n\n| **Short title** | | **Number and year** | | **Assent** | **Commencement** | |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| *Restraint of Debtors Act 1984* | | 73 of 1984 | | 29 Nov 1984 | 11 Jul 1986 (see s. 2 and *Gazette* 11 Jul 1986 p. 2333) | |\n| *Acts Amendment (Auxiliary Judges) Act 1997* Pt. 8 | | 23 of 1997 | | 18 Sep 1997 | 18 Sep 1997 (see s. 2) | |\n| *Acts Amendment (Equality of Status) Act 2003* s. 126 | | 28 of 2003 | | 22 May 2003 | 1 Jul 2003 (see s. 2 and *Gazette* 30 Jun 2003 p. 2579) | |\n| **Reprint 1: The *Restraint of Debtors Act 1984* as at 21 Nov 2003** (includes amendments listed above) | | | | | | |\n| *Courts Legislation Amendment and Repeal Act 2004* s. 141 | 59 of 2004 | | 23 Nov 2004 | | | 1 May 2005 (see s. 2 and *Gazette* 31 Dec 2004 p. 7128) |\n\n\n2 The provision of this Act that repeals the *Absconding Debtors Act 1877* has been omitted under the *Reprints Act 1984* s. 7(4)(f).\n\nDefined terms\n\n*[This is a list of terms defined and the provisions where they are defined. The list is not part of the law.]*\n\n**Defined term Provision(s)**\n\napplicant 3(1)\n\ndebt 3(1)\n\ndebtor 3(1)\n\nindebted 3(1)\n\njudicial officer 3(1)\n\nproperty 3(1)\n\nspecified 14(3)\n","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"summary":{"complexity_score":1,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"Scope cannot be assessed — the legislative text was not retrievable from the provided source. No comparison between original intent and current operation is possible."},"complexity_factors":["No legislative content was available for analysis — the source page returned a 'page not found' error","Complexity cannot be meaningfully assessed without access to the actual text of the Act","Score of 1 reflects absence of content, not simplicity of the underlying law"],"plain_english_summary":"## Restraint of Debtors Act 1984 (WA)\n\n**⚠️ Content Unavailable**\n\nThe actual text of this Western Australian law could not be retrieved. The legislation database page has moved or been taken down during a system upgrade, so no meaningful analysis of this Act's content can be provided.\n\n**What we do know:**\n- This is a **Western Australian law** from **1984**\n- The title suggests it deals with rules around **restraining debtors** — that is, legal mechanisms to restrict people who owe money (debtors) from taking certain actions, such as leaving the jurisdiction or disposing of assets, before a debt is resolved\n- To find the current text, visit the [Western Australian legislation website](https://www.legislation.wa.gov.au) and search directly for the Act by name"},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":5,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The legislation appears consistent with its original 1984 purpose as stated in the long title: 'to make provision for and in respect of the protection of creditors in certain circumstances.' While there have been amendments (notably regarding auxiliary judges and court procedures in 1997 and 2004), these appear to be technical updates rather than scope expansion. The Act maintains its narrow focus on pre-judgment remedies for absconding debtors and asset protection, without expanding into broader debt collection or insolvency matters."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple overlapping procedures across six Parts with distinct application requirements","Dual thresholds for satisfaction: 'satisfied as to all material matters' vs 'reasonable grounds for believing' (sections 3(3)-(4))","Cross-references between Parts II and III (e.g., section 5(2)(b)(ii)-(iv) references section 17 applications)","Conditional release mechanisms with nested consequences (section 16: breach of conditional release → revocation → automatic recommittal to custody)","Jurisdictional complexity: different courts (Supreme, District, Magistrates) and officers (judicial officers, magistrates, justices) have different powers depending on whether proceedings are already commenced","Ex parte hearing provisions (section 18) with third-party intervention rights creating procedural tension","Time-sensitive requirements (24-hour custody limits, 7-day service requirements, 6-month restraint on further applications under section 23)","Multiple pathways for review (section 21) with specific routing rules depending on the type of order sought"],"plain_english_summary":"This Western Australian law gives creditors special powers to stop debtors from escaping their debts by fleeing the state or hiding their assets. It has two main parts:\n\n**Part II - Stopping 'Absconding' Debtors:**\nIf a creditor believes a debtor (who owes them at least $500) is about to leave Western Australia to avoid paying, they can apply for a warrant to have the debtor arrested. The debtor can be brought before a court, which may release them on conditions like surrendering their passport, giving a written promise not to leave, or paying money into court. If the debtor breaks these conditions, police can arrest them again without a new warrant.\n\n**Part III - Freezing Property:**\nIf a creditor fears a debtor is about to sell or move property out of WA to defeat the debt, they can apply for a court order to stop the transfer or removal of that property.\n\n**Key Protections:**\n- The law includes safeguards against abuse: people who make applications without good reason face penalties up to $2,000 and must pay compensation to the debtor for expenses caused.\n- Police and officials acting in good faith are protected from being sued.\n- Debtors can apply to have warrants or orders reviewed, varied, or cancelled.\n\n**Who it affects:**\nPrimarily creditors (people or businesses owed money) and debtors in Western Australia where there's a risk the debtor will flee the jurisdiction or dissipate assets. It applies to debts of $500 or more (or a higher amount set by regulations)."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The text of the compilation shows subsequent amendments that altered the Act's operation and the categories of officials who may act under it. The Definition of \"judicial officer\" in section 3(1) was amended (see note \"Section 3 amended: No. 23 of 1997 s. 18\"), section 4 was deleted (see note \"Section 4 deleted: No. 28 of 2003 s. 126(2)\"), and further amendments affected section 6 and section 22 (see note \"Courts Legislation Amendment and Repeal Act 2004 s. 141\"). Those amendments, as recorded in the compilation table and in the footnotes, change operational scope by expanding who may issue warrants or act as a judicial officer and by altering procedural references elsewhere in the Act (s3(1); s6; s22)."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple courts and expanded definitions of \"judicial officer\" create variable decision‑makers across jurisdictions (s3(1); s6(3)).","Detailed evidentiary and form requirements for applications and affidavits, including prior-application disclosure (s5(2); s17(3)).","Discretionary threshold of being \"satisfied\" there are \"reasonable grounds\" (s3(3)–(4); s6(1); s19(2)).","Ex parte powers for restraining orders paired with post‑order service or notice options and third‑party joinder (s18).","Interplay of arrest, custody timelines and police duties (execution within one month, bringing before court within ~24 hours) (s11–12).","Multiple procedural paths (warrant, summons, conditional release, deposit, security, consent jurisdiction) and consequences for non‑compliance (s10; s14; s16; s20).","Review and re‑application limits (6‑month bar) and restrictions on appeals under other Acts (s21–24).","Monetary threshold and prescribed regulation‑making powers that can change operational detail (s3(3)(d); s30)."],"plain_english_summary":"What the Act does (mechanics)\n\n- Gives creditors a set of court-based tools to stop a person they say owes them money from leaving Western Australia (Part II) and to stop the debtor from transferring or removing property out of the State (Part III). Key procedural steps and powers include:\n  - An applicant (creditor) files a prescribed application supported by an affidavit stating the material facts and prior related applications (s5(2), s17(3)).\n  - A judicial officer, magistrate or justice may, on being satisfied there are reasonable grounds, issue either a summons to attend court or a warrant for the arrest of the named debtor to prevent departure from the State (s6(1); s3(3)).\n  - A summons must be personally served at least 7 days before the hearing (s9). A debtor may avoid appearing by paying, giving security, or depositing the claimed sum to abide determination of the claim (s10).\n  - Warrants must be executed by police within one month; police must serve copies and take the arrested person to a police station where the debtor is to be brought before the specified court within about 24 hours (s11(1)–(3); s12).\n  - At a preliminary hearing the court may release the debtor (conditionally or unconditionally), require undertakings not to leave the State, require security or deposit of money, order surrender of travel documents, or make other directions (s14).\n  - The Act also allows creditors to apply for restraining orders preventing transfer or removal of property situated in the State (s17–19). Those orders may be made ex parte (without the debtor present) but the court can require notice or service and allow interested third parties to join (s18).\n  - If the court hearing the matter is not otherwise a competent court for the debt, it may, with the consent of both parties, hear and determine the claim as if it were a competent court (consent jurisdiction) (s20).\n  - Review and appeal mechanisms are provided (Part V). A successful setting‑aside or variation of a warrant or order limits re‑application on the same debt for 6 months unless new evidence is introduced or leave is given (s21–23).\n\nWho it affects and who decides\n\n- Who may use the Act: a person who alleges a debt is owing to them and meets the affidavit and threshold requirements (s5, s17).\n- Who is affected: the named debtor (a natural person for Part II; a person or body corporate for Part III) and any third party with an interest in affected property (s3(1); s18(3)).\n- Decision‑makers: judicial officers, magistrates, justices, and courts determine whether there are reasonable grounds and what orders to make (s3; s6; s14). Police execute warrants and may make arrests without warrant where a conditional release is suspected to be breached (s11; s16).\n\nOfficial purpose claim, then what the Act actually imposes (trade‑offs and incentives)\n\n- The Act’s stated object is \"protection of creditors in certain circumstances.\" That is the statute’s claimed aim (long title). Mechanically, it gives creditors concentrated, court‑based instruments (warrants, summonses, restraining orders) to secure their ability to prosecute or enforce claims (Parts II–III).\n- Who pays and bears costs: the applicant bears upfront compliance costs — preparing prescribed forms and affidavits, paying prescribed execution fees recoverable as a debt to the Crown (s5(2); s11(3)). A debtor can avoid arrest by tender, security or deposit of the claimed amount (s10; s13). If an applicant brings an improper application, the applicant faces a penalty (s26) and the debtor can recover reasonable expenses and certain outlays (s27).\n- Incentives and trade‑offs: the Act concentrates benefit on an applicant who can meet the requirements and affords strong procedural remedies (including arrest and ex parte restraining orders), while imposing administrative burdens on courts, registry staff and police to process, serve and execute warrants and to hold prompt hearings (s8; s11; s12). The Act creates risk of interim restraint on a debtor’s movement or property before final determination, but it builds in mitigation: service requirements (s9), options to pay or give security (s10), preliminary hearing powers (s14), review routes (Part V), and sanctions for improper applications (s26–27).\n\nDiscretion, compliance burdens and implementation risks\n\n- Judicial discretion: courts and officers must be \"satisfied\" there are \"reasonable grounds\" on the listed matters before issuing warrants or restraining orders (s3(3)–(4); s6(1); s19(2)). That wording leaves substantive discretion to the decision‑maker.\n- Ex parte power: restraining orders may be made ex parte (s18(1)). The court can however order service or notice and can require steps to identify ownership (s18(2)). Third parties with an interest in property may join later (s18(3)).\n- Procedural and timing burdens: applicants must file prescribed forms and affidavits with specific content (s5(2); s17(3)), serve summonses at least 7 days ahead (s9), and transmit documents to court registries when warrants or summonses are issued (s8). Police must bring arrested debtors before the specified court within about 24 hours (s12). Warrants expire after one month if not executed (s11(1)).\n- Enforcement and remedies: courts may make a wide range of interim orders (s14). If a court sets aside or varies orders on review, re‑application is restricted for 6 months unless new evidence is lodged or leave is given (s23). The Act preserves other jurisdictions and remedies (s29).\n\nConcrete safeguards and limits in the text\n\n- Monetary threshold: the alleged debt must be at least $500 or a greater prescribed amount (s3(3)(d); s3(4)(e)).\n- Penalties and remedies for misuse: an applicant must not make an application where they lack reasonable cause or have delayed unreasonably (s26); penalty $2,000. A debtor harmed by an improper application can recover expenses and certain outlays (s27).\n- Protection for officials: police and other persons acting under the Act are protected from personal civil liability for acts done in good faith (s25).\n\nWhy it matters (practical effect)\n\n- The Act alters the litigation and enforcement environment by creating statutory, court‑supervised mechanisms that can be used pre‑judgment to immobilise an allegedly indebted person or their property pending determination. It allocates upfront procedural effort and some financial risk to applicants, while giving courts broad discretion to impose interim restraints and conditions, and it provides both review routes and sanctions for misuse (Parts II–V; s26–27)."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]},"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/restraint-of-debtors-act-1984","history":"/api/acts/restraint-of-debtors-act-1984/history","analysis":"/api/acts/restraint-of-debtors-act-1984/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/restraint-of-debtors-act-1984/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/restraint-of-debtors-act-1984/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/restraint-of-debtors-act-1984/documents"}}