{"id":"railways-access-act-1998","name":"Railways (Access) Act 1998","slug":"railways-access-act-1998","collection":"act","jurisdiction":"wa","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":106465,"registerId":"wa-railways-access-act-1998-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-03","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Railways (Access) Act 1998","content":"![Crest]()Western Australia\n\nRailways (Access) Act 1998\n\nWestern Australia\n\nRailways (Access) Act 1998\n\nContents\n\nPart 1 — Preliminary\n\n1. Short title 2\n\n2. Commencement 2\n\n2A. Object of the Act 2\n\n3 M. Terms used in this Act 2\n\n3A. Scope of access rights clarified 5\n\n3B. Access rights may bind person through whom title derives in certain cases 5\n\nPart 2 — Establishment of Code\n\n4. Minister to establish Code 7\n\n5. Criteria to be considered in applying Code to particular routes 8\n\n6. Other matters for which Code may make provision 9\n\n7. Code does not affect existing agreements 10\n\n8. Code is subject to *Rail Safety National Law (WA)* 10\n\n9. Code is subsidiary legislation 10\n\n10. Public comment on amendment or replacement of Code 11\n\n11. Exception to section 10 12\n\n11A. Consultation with railway owners on amendment or replacement of Code 13\n\n11B. Amending Code for purposes of TPI Railway and Port Agreement 13\n\n12. Review of Code 14\n\nPart 3 — The Regulator\n\n20. Functions of Regulator 16\n\n21. Powers to obtain information 17\n\n22. Powers in respect of documents etc. 18\n\n22A. Power of entry 18\n\n22B. Obstruction and deception 18\n\n22C. Legal professional privilege 19\n\n22D. Self‑incrimination 19\n\n23. Confidentiality 20\n\nPart 4 — Administrative and accounting arrangements\n\nDivision 1 — Preliminary\n\n24. Terms used in this Part 21\n\n25. This Part prevails over the *Government Railways Act 1904* 21\n\nDivision 2 — Administrative arrangements\n\n26. Authority to make administrative arrangements 21\n\n27. Delegation 22\n\nDivision 3 — Segregation of access‑related functions\n\n28. Duty to segregate 22\n\n29. Powers of Regulator in relation to segregation 22\n\n30. Matters to be covered under section 28 23\n\n31. Protection of confidential information 23\n\n32. Avoidance of conflict of interest 24\n\n33. Duty of fairness 24\n\n34. Maintenance of separate accounts and records 24\n\nPart 5 — Enforcement\n\n34A. Prohibitions on hindering or preventing access 25\n\n35. Contract enforcement not affected 25\n\n36. Remedies 26\n\n37. Injunctions 26\n\nNotes\n\nCompilation table 27\n\nOther notes 28\n\nDefined terms\n\n  \n\nWestern Australia\n\nRailways (Access) Act 1998\n\nAn Act to promote competition in the operation of rail services by —\n\n• providing for the establishment of a Code governing the use of certain facilities for rail operations by persons other than their owners;\n\n• conferring on the Economic Regulation Authority monitoring, enforcement and administrative functions for the implementation of the Code; and\n\n• specifying the kind of arrangements that railway owners are to have in place for the purposes of that implementation,\n\nto amend —\n\n• the *Government Railways Act 1904* to make consequential amendments 2; and\n\n• the *National Rail Corporation Agreement Act 1992* 2, 3,\n\nand for related purposes.\n\n[Long title amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 61; No. 55 of 2000 s. 4; No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 54.]\n\n## Part 1 — Preliminary\n\n##### 1. Short title\n\nThis Act may be cited as the *Railways (Access) Act 1998* 1.\n\n[Section 1 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 62.]\n\n##### 2. Commencement\n\n(1) Part 6 comes into operation on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent 1.\n\n(2) The other provisions of this Act come into operation on such day as is, or days as are respectively, fixed by proclamation 1.\n\n##### 2A. Object of the Act\n\nThe main object of this Act is to establish a rail access regime that encourages the efficient use of, and investment in, railway facilities by facilitating a contestable market for rail operations.\n\n[Section 2A inserted: No. 13 of 2000 s. 63.]\n\n##### 3 1M. Terms used in this Act\n\n(1) In this Act, unless the contrary intention appears —\n\naccess means the use of railway infrastructure;\n\naccess agreement means an agreement under the Code between a railway owner and another person for access by that person;\n\nAuthority means the Public Transport Authority of Western Australia established by the *Public Transport Authority Act 2003* section 5;\n\nCode means the Code for the time being in force under section 4;\n\nCompetition Principles Agreement means the Competition Principles Agreement made on 11 April 1995 by the Commonwealth, the States and the Territories as in force for the time being;\n\nGovernment railway means a railway, as defined in section 2 of the *Government Railways Act 1904*, that is under the management and control of the Authority as provided by section 13 of that Act;\n\nrailway infrastructure means the facilities necessary for the operation of a railway, including —\n\n(a) railway track, associated track structures, over or under track structures, supports (including supports for equipment or items associated with the use of a railway);\n\n(b) tunnels and bridges;\n\n(c) stations and platforms;\n\n(d) train control systems, signalling systems and communication systems;\n\n(e) electric traction infrastructure;\n\n(f) buildings and workshops; and\n\n(g) associated plant machinery and equipment,\n\nbut not including —\n\n(h) sidings or spur lines that are excluded by subsection (3) or (4) from being railway infrastructure associated with the railway concerned;\n\n(i) rolling stock, rolling stock maintenance facilities, office buildings, housing, freight centres, or terminal yards and depots;\n\nrailway owner means the person having the management and control of the use of the railway infrastructure;\n\nrailways network means —\n\n(a) all the railways that were Government railways when this Act received the Royal Assent 1;\n\n(b) all the railways that are on land that is corridor land as defined in the *Rail Freight System Act 2000*;\n\n(ba) the railway constructed pursuant to the TPI Railway and Port Agreement; and\n\n(c) any railway declared under subsection (2) to be a part of the railways network;\n\nRegulator means the Economic Regulation Authority established by the *Economic Regulation Authority Act 2003*;\n\n  TPI Railway and Port Agreement has the meaning given to the term “the Agreement” in the *Railway and Port (The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2004* section 3.\n\n(2) If a railway (the new railway) is constructed after this Act receives the Royal Assent 1 and the new railway is connected to a railway that is a part of the railways network, the Minister may, by order published in the *Gazette*, declare the new railway to be a part of the railways network.\n\n(3) If a siding associated with a railway is managed and controlled by a different person from the person who manages and controls the use of the railway, the siding is not railway infrastructure of the railway for the purposes of this Act.\n\n(4) If a spur line associated with a railway is connected to premises managed and controlled by a different person from the person who manages and controls the use of the railway, the spur line is not railway infrastructure of the railway for the purposes of this Act unless the Minister, by order published in the *Gazette*, declares that it, or any of it, is railway infrastructure of the railway.\n\n(6) For the purposes of this Act and the Code, the railway constructed pursuant to the TPI Railway and Port Agreement includes the Christmas Creek to Cloud Break spur line and is taken to have included that spur line since construction of the spur line was completed.\n\n(7) Subsections (3) and (4) do not apply to a siding or spur line associated with the railway constructed pursuant to the TPI Railway and Port Agreement.\n\n[Section 3 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 64; No. 55 of 2000 s. 5; No. 31 of 2003 s. 152(2); No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 55; No. 77 of 2004 s. 8; No. 60 of 2010 s. 10.]\n\n[Section 3, modifications have effect under the Railway (Roy Hill Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2010 s. 8. See note 1M.]\n\n##### 3A. Scope of access rights clarified\n\n(1) Without limiting the kinds of rights that can arise under an access agreement, those rights may entitle a person who has access to railway infrastructure to —\n\n(a) use land managed and controlled by the railway owner;\n\n(b) construct and operate a rail or other connection to the railway infrastructure,\n\nfor the purpose of exercising those rights.\n\n(2) Accordingly, the provisions of this Act about agreements and determinations to do with access extend to the matters described in subsection (1).\n\n[Section 3A inserted: No. 13 of 2000 s. 65.]\n\n##### 3B. Access rights may bind person through whom title derives in certain cases\n\n(1) If the right of the railway owner to manage and control the use of railway infrastructure is for a limited term or is subject to any other restriction imposed by the person through whom the railway owner derives those rights, the railway owner cannot give any right of access greater than the railway owner has.\n\n(2) Upon the premature termination of the railway owner’s right to manage and control the use of railway infrastructure (whether for default or any other reason) —\n\n(a) any right of access given by the railway owner continues as if it had been given by the person for the time being having the right to manage and control the use of the railway infrastructure (the current railway owner); and\n\n(b) an agreement under which the right of access arises has effect, with any necessary modifications, as if the current railway owner were the person who had entered into the agreement as the railway owner,\n\nunless within 3 months after the premature termination the current railway owner or any other party to the agreement gives to each other party notice in writing that the right of access and agreement are to terminate prematurely, in which case the right of access and agreement terminate at the time specified in the notice (being a time that is at least one month after the time when the notice was given), or the earliest time specified if more than one party gives notice under this subsection.\n\n[Section 3B inserted: No. 13 of 2000 s. 65.]\n\n## Part 2 — Establishment of Code\n\n##### 4. Minister to establish Code\n\n(1) The Minister is to establish a Code in accordance with this Act to give effect to the Competition Principles Agreement in respect of railways to which the Code applies.\n\n(2) Provision is to be made in the Code —\n\n(a) for railway infrastructure to be available for use by persons other than the railway owner to carry on rail operations in accordance with —\n\n(i) agreements with the railway owner; or\n\n(ii) determinations made by way of arbitration;\n\n(b) prescribing —\n\n(i) which parts of the railways network; and\n\n(ii) which railway infrastructure associated with those parts,\n\nare to be so available;\n\n(c) setting out —\n\n(i) provisions that are to govern the content of agreements and determinations referred to in paragraph (a);\n\n(ii) rights, powers and duties that are to apply to and in relation to the negotiation, making, and implementation of agreements; and\n\n(iii) duties and requirements in relation to the provision of access that are to be complied with by the railway owner;\n\nand\n\n(d) for the Regulator to have supervisory and other functions for the purposes of the Code, including a function of determining certain requirements in relation to access that are to be binding on the railway owner, a person making a proposal for access under the Code, and an arbitrator.\n\n(3) Provision may be made in the Code to exclude its application to interstate services and, for that purpose, to define what is an interstate service.\n\n[Section 4 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 66.]\n\n##### 5. Criteria to be considered in applying Code to particular routes\n\n(1) In deciding, for the purpose of establishing or amending the Code, which routes are to be prescribed under section 4(2)(b), the Minister is to consider the questions set out in subsection (3).\n\n(2) If in respect of a route the Minister is satisfied that each of those questions must be answered in the affirmative the route is to be prescribed under section 4(2)(b).\n\n(3) The questions are —\n\n(a) whether access to the route will promote competition in at least one market, other than the market for railway services;\n\n(b) whether it would be uneconomical for anyone to establish another railway on the route;\n\n(c) whether the route is of significance having regard to —\n\n(i) its length;\n\n(ii) its importance to trade or commerce; or\n\n(iii) its importance to the economy;\n\n(d) whether access to the route can be provided without undue risk to human health or safety;\n\n(e) whether there is not already effective access to the route; and\n\n(f) whether access or increased access to the route would not be contrary to the public interest.\n\n(4) A decision of the Minister of the kind referred to in subsection (1) is not liable to be challenged in, or reviewed or called in question by, a court.\n\n(5) In this section —\n\nroute means —\n\n(a) a particular part of the railways network; and\n\n(b) the associated railway infrastructure.\n\n##### 6. Other matters for which Code may make provision\n\n(1) The Code may also make provision for or in relation to —\n\n(a) the registration of access agreements;\n\n(b) the arbitration of disputes between a railway owner and a person who has made a proposal for access under the Code;\n\n(c) the establishment of panels of arbitrators, and the appointment of arbitrators, by the Regulator;\n\n(ca) the functions of the Regulator;\n\n(d) the regulation of matters —\n\n(i) of a savings, transitional or supplementary nature; or\n\n(ii) that are otherwise necessary or convenient for the purposes of this Act.\n\n(2) Transitional provisions referred to in subsection (1)(d)(i) may authorise the Minister to determine by order published in the *Gazette* how any matter in progress immediately before the commencement of this Part is to be treated, after that commencement, for the purposes of the provisions of the Code.\n\n[Section 6 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 67.]\n\n##### 7. Code does not affect existing agreements\n\nThe making of the Code —\n\n(a) does not affect the terms and conditions, or the operation, of an agreement for the use of railway infrastructure made with a railway owner before the commencement of the Code whether under section 61 of the *Government Railways Act 1904* or otherwise; and\n\n(b) does not afford a party to such an agreement any ground or reason for not complying with the agreement according to its terms and conditions.\n\n[Section 7 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 68.]\n\n##### 8. Code is subject to *Rail Safety National Law (WA)*\n\nThe Code is not to contain any provision that is contrary to or inconsistent with the *Rail Safety National Law (WA)*.\n\n[Section 8 amended: No. 18 of 2010 s. 271; No. 21 of 2015 s. 50; No. 7 of 2024 s. 58.]\n\n##### 9. Code is subsidiary legislation\n\n(1) The Code is subsidiary legislation within the meaning of the *Interpretation Act 1984*.\n\n(2) The Code is to be laid before each House of Parliament within 6 sitting days of that House next following publication of the Code in the *Gazette*.\n\n(3) Notice of motion to disallow the Code or any part of the Code may be given in either House of Parliament within 10 sitting days of that House after the Code has been laid before it under subsection (2).\n\n(4) Within 10 sitting days of a House of Parliament after notice of motion has been given in that House under subsection (3), that House may pass a resolution disallowing the Code or any part of the Code.\n\n(5) If the Code is not laid before both Houses of Parliament under subsection (2), or is disallowed by either House under subsection (4), the Code ceases to have effect, but without affecting the validity or curing the invalidity of anything done or the omission of anything in the meantime.\n\n(6) If a resolution has been passed under subsection (4), notice to that effect is to be published in the *Gazette* within 21 days.\n\n(7) In this section —\n\nthe Code includes —\n\n(a) an amendment of the Code; or\n\n(b) a code repealing and replacing the Code.\n\n##### 10. Public comment on amendment or replacement of Code\n\n(1) Before the Minister exercises the power —\n\n(a) to amend the Code; or\n\n(b) to repeal and replace it,\n\nhe or she must make the proposed amendment or replacement available for public comment in accordance with subsection (2).\n\n(2) The Minister must —\n\n(a) cause a notice giving a general description of the proposal to be published in one issue of —\n\n(i) a daily newspaper circulating throughout the Commonwealth; and\n\n(ii) a daily newspaper circulating throughout the State;\n\nand\n\n(b) include in the notice the following information —\n\n(i) the places at which a copy of the proposal may be obtained;\n\n(ii) a statement that written submissions on the proposal may be made to the Minister by any person within a specified period; and\n\n(iii) the address to which the submissions may be delivered or posted.\n\n(3) The period specified under subsection (2)(b)(ii) is not to be less than 30 days after both of the notices under subsection (2)(a) have been published.\n\n(4) The Minister must have regard to any submission made in accordance with the notice.\n\n##### 11. Exception to section 10\n\n(1) Section 10(1) does not apply if the Minister is satisfied that a proposed amendment to the Code is —\n\n(a) of a minor nature; or\n\n(b) required to be made urgently.\n\n(2) If in reliance on subsection (1)(b) the Minister amends the Code without complying with section 10(1) —\n\n(a) he or she must call for public comment on the amendment as soon as is practicable after it has come into force; and\n\n(b) section 10(2) and (3) apply with all necessary modifications.\n\n(3) Having regard to any submissions made on the amendment, the Minister must consider whether he or she should amend the Code —\n\n(a) to reverse the effect of the amendment; or\n\n(b) in some other manner.\n\n##### 11A. Consultation with railway owners on amendment or replacement of Code\n\n(1) Without limiting section 10, if the Minister considers that a proposed amendment or replacement of the Code may affect a railway owner, the Minister must consult with the railway owner and have regard to any submissions that the railway owner makes in relation to the proposal.\n\n(2) If a railway owner considers that the Code, or a provision of it, has, as a result of altered circumstances, become unreasonable or inappropriate in its application to the railway owner, the railway owner may make a submission to the Minister requesting that the Code be amended or be repealed and replaced.\n\n(3) The Minister must consider a submission made under subsection (2) and, if requested by the railway owner, consult with the railway owner in relation to it.\n\n[Section 11A inserted: No. 13 of 2000 s. 69.]\n\n##### 11B. Amending Code for purposes of TPI Railway and Port Agreement\n\n(1) The Minister may, by order published in the *Gazette*, amend the Code for the purposes of its application to the railway constructed pursuant to the TPI Railway and Port Agreement.\n\n(2) If, after the commencement of the *Railway and Port (The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2010* section 11, the railway constructed pursuant to the TPI Railway and Port Agreement is expanded or extended (including by the addition of a spur line), the Minister must, by order published in the *Gazette*, amend the Code so that it applies to the expansion or extension.\n\n(3) Sections 5 and 10 to 11A do not apply in relation to an amendment made under this section.\n\n(4) An amendment made under subsection (2) is not an amendment of the Code for the purposes of section 9(2) to (6) of this Act.\n\n[Section 11B inserted: No. 60 of 2010 s. 11.]\n\n[**12A 1M.** A modification to insert s. 12A, has effect under the Railway (Roy Hill Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2010 s. 9. See note 1M.]\n\n##### 12. Review of Code\n\n(1) The Regulator must carry out a review of the Code as soon as is practicable after —\n\n(a) the third anniversary of its commencement; and\n\n(b) the expiry of each 5 yearly interval after that anniversary.\n\n(2) The purpose of a review is to assess the suitability of the provisions of the Code to give effect to the Competition Principles Agreement in respect of railways to which the Code applies.\n\n(3) Before carrying out a review of the Code, the Regulator must call for public comment in accordance with subsection (4).\n\n(4) The Regulator must —\n\n(a) cause notice of the review to be published, in one issue of —\n\n(i) a daily newspaper circulating throughout the Commonwealth; and\n\n(ii) a daily newspaper circulating throughout the State;\n\nand\n\n(b) include in the notice —\n\n(i) a statement that written submissions on the Code may be made to the Regulator by any person within a specified period; and\n\n(ii) the address to which the submissions may be delivered or posted.\n\n(5) The period specified under subsection (4)(b)(i) is not to be less than 30 days after both of the notices under subsection (4)(a) have been published.\n\n(6) The Regulator must prepare a report based on the review and give it to the Minister.\n\n[Section 12 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 70.]\n\n## Part 3 — The Regulator\n\n[Division 1 (s. 13‑19B) deleted: No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 56.]\n\n[Division 2 heading deleted: No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 57.]\n\n##### 20. Functions of Regulator\n\n(1) The Regulator —\n\n(a) is responsible for monitoring and enforcing compliance by railway owners with this Act and the Code; and\n\n(b) also has the functions given by particular provisions of this Act and the Code.\n\n(2) The Regulator may exercise the powers given by this Part for the purpose of performing its functions under this Act and the Code.\n\n(3) Without limiting subsection (2), the powers given by this Part extend to financial information relating to a railway owner’s own use of railway infrastructure to which the Code applies.\n\n(4) In performing functions under this Act or the Code, the Regulator is to take into account —\n\n(a) the railway owner’s legitimate business interests and investment in railway infrastructure;\n\n(b) the railway owner’s costs of providing access, including any costs of extending or expanding the railway infrastructure, but not including costs associated with losses arising from increased competition in upstream or downstream markets;\n\n(c) the economic value to the railway owner of any additional investment that a person seeking access or the railway owner has agreed to undertake;\n\n(d) the interests of all persons holding contracts for the use of the railway infrastructure;\n\n(e) firm and binding contractual obligations of the railway owner and any other person already using the railway infrastructure;\n\n(f) the operational and technical requirements necessary for the safe and reliable use of the railway infrastructure;\n\n(g) the economically efficient use of the railway infrastructure; and\n\n(h) the benefit to the public from having competitive markets.\n\n[Section 20 inserted: No. 55 of 2000 s. 8; amended: No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 58.]\n\n[**20A‑20C.** Deleted: No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 59.]\n\n##### 21. Powers to obtain information\n\n(1) The Regulator may by notice in writing require a railway owner —\n\n(a) to send to the Regulator before a day specified in the notice a statement setting out such information as is specified in the notice;\n\n(b) to give information to the Regulator by way of periodical returns at times specified in the notice; and\n\n(c) to send to the Regulator, before a day specified in the notice, any book, document, or record that is in the possession or under the control of the railway owner.\n\n(2) A railway owner must comply with a notice under subsection (1).\n\nPenalty: $100 000.\n\nDaily penalty: $20 000.\n\n[Section 21 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 73.]\n\n##### 22. Powers in respect of documents etc.\n\nThe Regulator may inspect any book, document or record produced or sent to the Regulator and —\n\n(a) retain it for such reasonable period as the Regulator thinks fit; and\n\n(b) make copies of it or any of its contents.\n\n[Section 22 amended: No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 60.]\n\n##### 22A. Power of entry\n\n(1) The Regulator may, for the purposes of this Act, enter any premises that are used in connection with the operation of a part of the railways network to which the Code applies and inspect the premises or anything in or on the premises.\n\n(2) A railway owner must facilitate any entry and inspection under subsection (1).\n\nPenalty: $100 000.\n\n[Section 22A inserted: No. 13 of 2000 s. 74.]\n\n##### 22B. Obstruction and deception\n\n(1) A person must not hinder or obstruct the Regulator exercising any power conferred by this Part.\n\nPenalty: $100 000.\n\n(2) A person must not give information to the Regulator acting under this Part that the person knows to be false or misleading in a material particular.\n\nPenalty: $100 000.\n\n[Section 22B inserted: No. 13 of 2000 s. 74; amended: No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 61.]\n\n##### 22C. Legal professional privilege\n\nNothing in this Part prevents a railway owner from refusing to —\n\n(a) send a statement or otherwise give information; or\n\n(b) produce or send a book, document or record,\n\nbecause the information would be, or the book, document or record contains, information in respect of which the railway owner claims legal professional privilege.\n\n[Section 22C inserted: No. 13 of 2000 s. 74; amended: No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 62.]\n\n##### 22D. Self‑incrimination\n\nAn individual is not excused from complying with a requirement under section 21 on the ground that to do so might incriminate the individual or render the individual liable to a penalty, but —\n\n(a) a statement or return sent or given by the individual that was made or brought into existence to comply with the requirement; or\n\n(b) the fact that a book, document, or record produced or sent by the individual to comply with the requirement was produced or sent,\n\nis not admissible in evidence in any civil or criminal proceedings against the individual other than proceedings for perjury or for an offence against this Act arising out of the false or misleading nature of the information given.\n\n[Section 22D inserted: No. 13 of 2000 s. 74.]\n\n##### 23. Confidentiality\n\nIn relation to the exercise of its powers under this Part, the Regulator must ensure that confidential information to which section 31 applies is protected from use or disclosure except —\n\n(a) in the performance of its functions under this Act and the Code;\n\n(b) as required or allowed by any law;\n\n(c) with the written consent of the person who supplied the information; or\n\n(d) in circumstances prescribed by regulations made by the Governor for the purposes of this section.\n\nPenalty: $100 000.\n\n[Section 23 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 75; No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 63.]\n\n[Division 3, 4 and 5 (s. 23A‑23G) deleted: No. 67 of 2003 Sch. 2 cl. 64.]\n\n## Part 4 — Administrative and accounting arrangements\n\n[Heading amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 76.]\n\n### Division 1 — Preliminary\n\n##### 24. Terms used in this Part\n\nIn this Part —\n\n  access‑related functions  means the functions involved in arranging the provision of access to railway infrastructure under the Code;\n\n  officer of the Authority  includes an officer of the Department as defined in the *Government Railways Act 1904*;\n\n  relevant officer means an officer or employee of a railway owner who is in any way concerned in the performance of access‑related functions.\n\n[Section 24 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 77; No. 31 of 2003 s. 152(3).]\n\n##### 25. This Part prevails over the *Government Railways Act 1904*\n\nThis Part has effect, and is to be carried out, despite the provisions of the *Government Railways Act 1904*.\n\n[Section 25 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 78.]\n\n### Division 2 — Administrative arrangements\n\n##### 26. Authority to make administrative arrangements\n\nThe Authority is to make such administrative arrangements within its organization that it from time to time considers necessary or expedient for the carrying out of its access‑related functions.\n\n[Section 26 amended: No. 31 of 2003 s. 152(4).]\n\n##### 27. Delegation\n\n(1) A person to whom the Authority, under the *Public Transport Authority Act 2003* section 19, delegates a function under this Act must be an officer of the Authority.\n\n(2) A function performed by the person in accordance with the delegation is to be taken to have been performed by the Authority.\n\n[Section 27 inserted: No. 31 of 2003 s. 152(5).]\n\n### Division 3 — Segregation of access‑related functions\n\n##### 28. Duty to segregate\n\n(1) A railway owner must make arrangements to segregate its access‑related functions from its other functions.\n\n(2) A railway owner must have appropriate controls and procedures to ensure that the measures in place under subsection (1) —\n\n(a) operate effectively; and\n\n(b) are complied with.\n\n[Section 28 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 79.]\n\n##### 29. Powers of Regulator in relation to segregation\n\n(1) Before a railway owner puts in place or varies any arrangement for the purpose of carrying out its obligations under section 28 it must obtain the Regulator’s approval to the arrangement or variation.\n\n(2) In addition to subsection (1), the Regulator may confer with a railway owner on any matter which relates to the way in which the railway owner’s obligations under section 28 are to be carried out, with a view to the Regulator and the railway owner reaching agreement on the matter.\n\n(3) The Regulator may give directions in writing to a railway owner with respect to a matter to the extent that agreement is not reached under subsection (2), and the railway owner is to comply with any such direction.\n\n(4) If a railway owner fails to comply with —\n\n(a) an arrangement, or varied arrangement, approved under subsection (1);\n\n(b) an agreement reached under subsection (2); or\n\n(c) a direction given under subsection (3),\n\nthe railway owner commits an offence.\n\nPenalty: $100 000.\n\n[Section 29 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 80.]\n\n##### 30. Matters to be covered under section 28\n\nWithout limiting section 28, in carrying out its obligations under that section a railway owner must ensure that the provisions of sections 31, 32, 33 and 34 are satisfied.\n\n[Section 30 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 81.]\n\n##### 31. Protection of confidential information\n\n(1) There must be an effective regime designed for the protection of confidential information relating to the affairs of persons seeking access or rail operators from —\n\n(a) improper use; and\n\n(b) disclosure by relevant officers, or other persons, to other officers or employees of the railway owner or other persons, except for proper purposes.\n\n(2) In this section —\n\nconfidential information means information that has not been made public and that —\n\n(a) is by its nature confidential;\n\n(b) was specified to be confidential by the person who supplied it; or\n\n(c) is known by a person using or disclosing it to be confidential.\n\n[Section 31 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 82.]\n\n##### 32. Avoidance of conflict of interest\n\nThe arrangements under section 28 must be such as to ensure that a relevant officer does not have a conflict between his or her duties —\n\n(a) as a person concerned in the performance of access‑related functions, on the one hand; and\n\n(b) as a person involved in other business of the railway owner, on the other.\n\n[Section 32 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 83.]\n\n##### 33. Duty of fairness\n\nIn performing their functions relevant officers must not have regard to the interests of the railway owner in a way that is unfair to persons seeking access or to other rail operators.\n\n[Section 33 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 84.]\n\n##### 34. Maintenance of separate accounts and records\n\nA railway owner must ensure that its accounts and records are in such form as to enable —\n\n(a) all income, expenditure, assets and liabilities relating to the carrying out of its access‑related functions to be properly recorded and distinguished from the railway owner’s other income, expenditure, assets and liabilities; and\n\n(b) where necessary, any item of income, expenditure, assets or liabilities which relates only in part to the carrying out of its access‑related functions to be apportioned in a fair and reasonable manner.\n\n[Section 34 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 85.]\n\n## Part 5 — Enforcement\n\n##### 34A. Prohibitions on hindering or preventing access\n\n(1) The railway owner in relation to a part of the railways network to which the Code applies must not engage in conduct aimed at hindering or preventing —\n\n(a) access by any person to that part of the railways network for the purpose of carrying on rail operations to which the Code applies;\n\n(b) the making of access agreements or any particular agreement in respect of that part of the railways network; or\n\n(c) the access to which a person is entitled under an access agreement or a determination made by way of arbitration.\n\n(2) A person who has access under an access agreement must not engage in conduct aimed at hindering or preventing access by another person to any part of the railways network to which the Code applies.\n\n(3) Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply to conduct that the railway owner, or a person referred to in subsection (2), is entitled to engage in under this Act, the Code or some other written law or under an access agreement.\n\nPenalty: $100 000.\n\nDaily penalty: $20 000.\n\n[Section 34A inserted: No. 13 of 2000 s. 86.]\n\n##### 35. Contract enforcement not affected\n\nNothing in this Part affects the enforceability of an access agreement as a contract, or the availability of damages for a breach of the agreement.\n\n##### 36. Remedies\n\n(1) The obligations imposed by the Code are enforceable —\n\n(a) by arbitration under the Code; or\n\n(b) under section 37,\n\nas the case may require, but a breach of those obligations does not give rise to an action for damages.\n\n(2) Sections 177 and 178 of *The Criminal Code* do not apply to the obligations referred to in subsection (1).\n\n[Section 36 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 87.]\n\n##### 37. Injunctions\n\n(1) The Supreme Court may grant an injunction in such terms as the Court thinks fit if it is satisfied that a person —\n\n(a) has engaged in conduct that amounts to a breach of the Code; or\n\n(b) is proposing to engage in conduct that would amount to such a breach,\n\nother than conduct for which a remedy by way of arbitration is available under the Code.\n\n(2) An application for an injunction under subsection (1) may be made by —\n\n(a) the Regulator; or\n\n(b) a person to whose proposal under the Code for access the conduct or proposed conduct relates.\n\n[Section 37 amended: No. 13 of 2000 s. 88.]\n\n[Parts 6 and 7 omitted under the Reprints Act 1984 s. 7(4)(e).]\n\n![]()\n\nNotes\n\nThis is a compilation of the *Railways (Access) Act 1998* and includes amendments made by other written laws. For provisions that have come into operation, and for information about any reprints, see the compilation table.\n\nCompilation table\n\n| **Short title** | **Number and year** | **Assent** | **Commencement** |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| *Government Railways (Access) Act 1998*4 | 49 of 1998 | 30 Nov 1998 | s. 1 and 2: 30 Nov 1998;   Pt. 6: 30 Nov 1998 (see s. 2(1));   s. 3 and Pt. 2: 12 Aug 2000 (see s. 2(2) and *Gazette* 11 Aug 2000 p. 4691);   Pt. 3‑5 and 7: 1 Sep 2001 (see s. 2(2) and *Gazette* 28 Aug 2001 p. 4795) |\n| *Rail Freight System Act 2000* Pt. 5 Div. 1 5 | 13 of 2000 | 8 Jun 2000 | 1 Jul 2000 (see s. 2(2) and *Gazette* 30 Jun 2000 p. 3397) |\n| *Railways (Access) Amendment Act 2000* Pt. 2 | 55 of 2000 | 28 Nov 2000 | 28 Nov 2000 (see s. 2) |\n| **Reprint of the *Railways (Access) Act 1998* as at 2 Feb 2001** (includes amendments listed above except those in the *Government Railways (Access) Act 1998* Pt. 3‑5 and 7) | | | |\n| **Reprint of the *Railways (Access) Act 1998* as at 12 Oct 2001** (includes amendments listed above) | | | |\n| *Machinery of Government (Planning and Infrastructure) Amendment Act 2002* s. 63 | 7 of 2002 | 19 Jun 2002 | 1 Jul 2002 (see s. 2 and *Gazette* 28 Jun 2002 p. 3037) |\n| *Public Transport Authority Act 2003* s. 152 | 31 of 2003 | 26 May 2003 | 1 Jul 2003 (see s. 2(1) and *Gazette* 27 Jun 2003 p. 2384) |\n| *Economic Regulation Authority Act 2003* Sch. 2 Div. 12 6 | 67 of 2003 | 5 Dec 2003 | 1 Jan 2004 (see s. 2 and *Gazette* 30 Dec 2003 p. 5723) |\n| *Railway and Port (The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2004* Pt. 3 Div. 1 | 77 of 2004 | 8 Dec 2004 | 1 Jul 2008 (see s. 2(2) and *Gazette* 17 Jun 2008 p. 2543) |\n| **Reprint 3: The *Railways (Access) Act 1998* as at 8 Aug 2008** (includes amendments listed above) | | | |\n| *Rail Safety Act 2010* Pt. 11 Div. 5 | 18 of 2010 | 28 Jun 2010 | 1 Feb 2011 (see s. 2(b) and *Gazette* 28 Jan 2011 p. 241) |\n| *Railway and Port (The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Amendment Act 2010* Pt. 3 | 60 of 2010 | 10 Dec 2010 | 11 Dec 2010 (see s. 2(b)) |\n| *Rail Safety National Law (WA) Act 2015* Pt. 5 | 21 of 2015 | 17 Sep 2015 | 2 Nov 2015 (see s. 2(b) and *Gazette* 16 Oct 2015 p. 4149) |\n| *Rail Safety National Law Application Act 2024* s. 58 | 7 of 2024 | 26 Mar 2024 | 1 Oct 2024 (see s. 2(b) and SL 2024/193 cl. 2) |\n\n\nOther notes\n\n1M Under the *Railway (Roy Hill Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2010* Pt. 3, this Act must be applied with the modifications set out in that Part. Those modifications have effect on and from 15 Aug 2015 until that Part expires in accordance with s. 15 of that Act.\n\n2 The provisions in this Act amending these Acts have been omitted under the *Reprints Act 1984* s. 7(4)(e).\n\n3 Repealed by the *National Rail Corporation Agreement Repeal Act 1999* s. 3.\n\n4 Now known as the *Railways (Access) Act 1998*; short title changed (see note under s. 1).\n\n5 The *Railways (Access) Amendment Act 2000* s. 13 repealed the *Rail Freight System Act 2000* s. 89.\n\n6 The *Economic Regulation Authority Act 2003* s. 63(1), which gives effect to Sch. 3, reads as follows:\n\n“\n\n63. Transitional and saving provisions\n\n(1) Schedule 3 has effect to make transitional and saving provisions in respect of the amendments made in Schedule 2 Divisions 8, 12 and 18.\n\n”.\n\nSchedule 3 reads as follows:\n\n“\n\nSchedule 3 — Transitional and saving provisions for amendments in Schedule 2 Divisions 8, 12 and 18\n\n[s. 63(1)]\n\n1. Definitions\n\nIn this Schedule —\n\ncommencement day means the day on which this Schedule comes into operation;\n\n  former official means —\n\n(a) the Coordinator of Water Services referred to in section 4 of the *Water Services Coordination Act 1995* as in effect immediately before the commencement day;\n\n(b) the Gas Pipelines Access Regulator; or\n\n(c) the Rail Access Regulator;\n\n  Gas Pipelines Access Regulator means the Western Australian Independent Gas Pipelines Access Regulator referred to in section 27 of the *Gas Pipelines Access (Western Australia) Act 1998* as in effect immediately before the commencement day;\n\n  Rail Access Regulator means the Western Australian Independent Rail Access Regulator referred to in section 13 of the *Railways (Access) Act 1998* as in effect immediately before the commencement day.\n\n2. *Interpretation Act 1984* to apply\n\nThis Schedule does not limit the operation of the *Interpretation Act 1984*.\n\n3. Decisions of Gas Pipelines Access Regulator\n\nWithout limiting the operation of clause 6, a decision made by the Gas Pipelines Access Regulator as the local Regulator for the purposes of the Gas Pipelines Access (Western Australia) Law that was in effect immediately before the commencement day continues, on and after that day, as if made by the Authority as the local Regulator for the purposes of that Law.\n\n4. Decisions of Rail Access Regulator\n\nWithout limiting the operation of clause 6, a decision made by the Rail Access Regulator as the Regulator for the purposes of the Code (as defined in the *Railways (Access) Act 1998*) that was in effect immediately before the commencement day continues, on and after that day, as if made by the Authority as the Regulator for the purposes of that Code.\n\n5. Licences under Part 3 of the *Water Services Coordination Act 1995*\n\nWithout limiting the operation of clause 6, an operating licence that was in effect under Part 3 of the *Water Services Coordination Act 1995* immediately before the commencement day continues, on and after that day, as an operating licence in effect under that Part as amended by Schedule 2 Division 18.\n\n6. Continuing effect of things done\n\nOn and after the commencement day any act, matter or thing done or omitted to be done before that day by, to, or in respect of, a former official (to the extent that that act, matter or thing has any force or effect) is to be taken to have been done or omitted by, to, or in respect of, the Authority.\n\n7. Completion of things begun\n\nOn and after the commencement day anything lawfully commenced by a former official may, so far as it is not contrary to this Act or any other written law that gives functions to the Authority, be carried on and completed by the Authority.\n\n8. Proceedings etc.\n\nAny proceedings or remedy that immediately before the commencement day might have been brought or continued by or available against or to a former official, may, on and after that day, be brought or continued and are available, by or against or to the Authority.\n\n9. Records\n\nOn and after the commencement day the Authority is to take delivery of all papers, documents, minutes, books of account and other records (however compiled, recorded or stored) relating to the operations of each former official.\n\n10. Bank accounts\n\n(1) The moneys standing to the credit of the account referred to in section 45 of the *Gas Pipelines Access (Western Australia) Act 1998* immediately before the commencement day are to be transferred to the account referred to in section 21 as soon as is practicable after that day.\n\n(2) The moneys standing to the credit of the account referred to in section 23D of the *Railways (Access) Act 1998* immediately before the commencement day are to be transferred to the account referred to in section 21 as soon as is practicable after that day.\n\n11. References to former official in agreements and instruments\n\nAny agreement or instrument subsisting immediately before the commencement day —\n\n(a) to which a former official is a party; or\n\n(b) which contains a reference to a former official,\n\nhas effect after the commencement day as if —\n\n(c) the Authority were substituted for the former official as a party to the agreement or instrument; and\n\n(d) any reference in the agreement or instrument to the former official were (unless the context otherwise requires) amended to be or include a reference to the Authority.\n\n12. References to former official in written law\n\nA reference to a former official in an enactment in force immediately before the commencement day may, where the context so requires, be read as if it had been amended to be a reference to the Authority.\n\n13. Immunity to continue\n\nDespite the amendments made in Schedule 2 Divisions 8, 12 and 18, where a former official had the benefit of any immunity in respect of an act, matter or thing done or omitted before the commencement day, that immunity continues in that respect for the benefit of the Authority.\n\n14. Saving\n\nThe operation of any provision of this Schedule is not to be regarded —\n\n(a) as a breach of contract or confidence or otherwise as a civil wrong;\n\n(b) as a breach of any contractual provision prohibiting, restricting or regulating the assignment or transfer of assets, rights or liabilities of the disclosure of information;\n\n(c) as giving rise to any remedy by a party to an instrument or as causing or permitting the termination of any instrument, because of a change in the beneficial or legal ownership of any asset, right or liability;\n\n(d) as causing any contract or instrument to be void or otherwise unenforceable; or\n\n(e) as releasing or allowing the release of any surety.\n\n”.\n\nDefined terms\n\n*[This is a list of terms defined and the provisions where they are defined. The list is not part of the law.]*\n\n**Defined term Provision(s)**\n\naccess 3(1)\n\naccess agreement 3(1)\n\naccess‑related functions 24\n\nAuthority 3(1)\n\nCode 3(1)\n\nCompetition Principles Agreement 3(1)\n\nconfidential information 31(2)\n\nGovernment railway 3(1)\n\nnew railway 3(2)\n\nofficer of the Authority 24\n\nrailway infrastructure 3(1)\n\nrailway owner 3(1)\n\nrailways network 3(1)\n\nRegulator 3(1)\n\nrelevant officer 24\n\nroute 5(5)\n\nthe Code 9(7)\n\nthe current railway owner 3B(2)\n\nTPI Railway and Port Agreement 3(1)\n\n© State of Western Australia 2024.\n\nThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). To view relevant information and for a link to a copy of the licence, visit www.legislation.wa.gov.au.\n\nAttribute work as: © State of Western Australia 2024.\n\nBy Authority: GEOFF O. LAWN, Government Printer\n","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"Unauthenticated. Configure AI_GATEWAY_API_KEY or use a provider module. Learn more: https://ai-sdk.dev/unauthenticated-ai-gateway","source":"analysis-cron"},"summary":{"complexity_score":1,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"Scope cannot be assessed as no legislative content was available for analysis. The URL provided returned a broken page notice rather than the text of the Railways (Access) Act 1998."},"complexity_factors":["No substantive legislative content was retrievable from the provided URL — only an error/redirect page was returned","Analysis cannot be performed without the actual text of the legislation","Complexity score of 1 reflects the absence of content to assess, not the inherent simplicity of the Act itself"],"plain_english_summary":"**No legislation content could be retrieved.**\n\nThe page for the *Railways (Access) Act 1998* (Western Australia) is no longer available at the provided URL. The website has undergone system and security upgrades, and the link appears to be broken or outdated.\n\n**What we do know from the title alone:**\nThis Act relates to access to railway infrastructure in Western Australia — likely governing how third parties (such as freight or passenger operators) can apply to use railway lines owned by others, including government-owned rail networks. Such legislation typically sets out rights, pricing frameworks, and dispute resolution processes for rail access.\n\n**To find the current version of this Act**, visit the Western Australian legislation website (legislation.wa.gov.au) and search directly for *Railways (Access) Act 1998*."},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The legislation has grown significantly beyond its original 1998 scope. Initially focused on government railways and general competition principles, it has expanded through amendments to accommodate specific private mining infrastructure (TPI/Roy Hill agreements) with bespoke amendment procedures (section 11B), modified application regimes referenced in notes but not fully contained in the Act, and integration with national rail safety laws. The original 'generic' access regime has become a hybrid framework handling both public transport and massive private iron ore rail networks with tailored provisions."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple amendment layers (13 amending acts since 1998) creating a patchwork of inserted sections and deleted divisions","Extensive cross-referencing to other statutes: *Government Railways Act 1904*, *Public Transport Authority Act 2003*, *Economic Regulation Authority Act 2003*, *Rail Safety National Law (WA)*, *Railway and Port (The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2004*, and *Railway (Roy Hill Infrastructure Pty Ltd) Agreement Act 2010*","Nested conditional logic in section 3B regarding continuation of access rights upon premature termination of railway owner's rights","Special exemption regimes: section 11B exempts TPI railway amendments from standard public consultation and disallowance procedures","Delegated legislative framework: the actual operative rules are in the Code (subsidiary legislation), not the Act itself, creating a two-layer regulatory structure","Modified application under separate Agreement Acts (Roy Hill modifications noted but not fully reproduced in the text)","Multiple penalty structures including daily penalties (sections 21, 34A) and standard penalties","Complex definition of \"railway infrastructure\" with specific inclusions (tunnels, traction systems) and exclusions (sidings/spur lines under subsections 3(3)-(4)), plus exceptions to those exclusions for TPI railway"],"plain_english_summary":"**What this law does:**\n\nThis is Western Australia's law that forces railway owners to let other companies use their train tracks and related infrastructure (like signals, stations, and bridges). It's designed to stop monopolies and encourage competition in rail transport.\n\n**Who it affects:**\n\n* **Railway owners** – mainly the Public Transport Authority (which runs WA's government railways) and private operators like those in the Pilbara mining region. They must allow competitors to use their tracks under fair terms.\n* **Companies wanting to run trains** – they can demand access to existing railway lines instead of building their own parallel tracks.\n* **The Economic Regulation Authority** – this independent body acts as the \"cop on the beat,\" monitoring compliance, resolving disputes, and enforcing the rules.\n\n**How it works:**\n\n* The Minister creates a **Code** (subsidiary legislation) that sets out the specific rules for access, including pricing and conditions.\n* The Code applies to the \"railways network\" – essentially the old government rail system, certain freight corridors, and specific private lines like the Pilbara infrastructure.\n* Access can be negotiated by **agreement** or, if talks fail, determined by **arbitration**.\n* Railway owners must **segregate** their access-related staff and accounts from their other operations to prevent conflicts of interest and protect confidential information.\n\n**Why it matters:**\n\nWithout this law, a company that owned the only railway line to a mine or port could block competitors from using it, forcing them to build duplicate tracks (wasteful) or go out of business. This law ensures efficient use of existing infrastructure and keeps freight costs competitive, which matters for WA's mining and export economy.\n\n**Key quirks:**\n\n* The Code is subject to the national *Rail Safety National Law*, so safety rules always trump access demands.\n* Special fast-track amendment powers exist for the Pilbara (TPI) railway to accommodate expansion without full public consultation.\n* Access rights can survive even if the original railway owner loses control of the track (through bankruptcy or lease expiry)."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The Act’s scope has been expanded and operationally altered by later amendments recorded in the text. Notable scope extensions include: adding the TPI Railway specifically into the definition of the railways network (s.3(1)(ba), s.3(6)) and providing a distinct amendment pathway for that railway (s.11B); expanding the definition of railways network to include railways on corridor land (s.3(1)(b)); and replacing the original Rail Access Regulator role with the Economic Regulation Authority as the Regulator (definition in s.3(1) and functions in s.20). The Code’s administrative and enforcement arrangements have also been adjusted by later inserts (for example, the segregation duties and Regulator approval powers in s.28–s.29) and by deletions and reassignments noted in the parts and compilation notes. These changes broaden both the set of infrastructure the Act can reach and the institutional arrangements for implementation (see s.3, s.11B, s.20, compilation/notes)."},"complexity_factors":["Layered regulatory structure: Minister sets the Code (s.4, s.5), while the Regulator administers and enforces it (s.20), creating multiple decision‑makers.","Significant cross-references and subsidiary legislation: the Code is subsidiary legislation with parliamentary tabling and disallowance procedures (s.9), and must be consistent with the Rail Safety National Law (s.8).","Detailed operational duties and organizational requirements: segregation of functions, confidentiality regimes, conflict-of-interest rules, and separate accounting obligations (s.28–s.34).","Wide information and inspection powers subject to privilege and limited admissibility (s.21–s.23, s.22A–s.22D), with high statutory penalties (s.21, s.22B, s.23, s.29, s.34A).","Special-purpose and exception provisions (e.g. TPI Railway amendments and exemptions in s.11B) that modify standard consultation/review procedures.","Remedy design that channels disputes to arbitration or injunctions and limits damages claims (s.36–s.37), changing usual litigation incentives.","Non-reviewable ministerial decisions on route coverage (s.5(4)), reducing judicial oversight over core scope choices.","Periodic review and public consultation requirements for the Code (s.10, s.12) add administrative cycles and procedural complexity."],"plain_english_summary":"What this law changes, mechanically\n\n- Establishes a rules-based rail access regime (the \"Code\") under which parts of the State rail network and specified infrastructure can be made available for use by people other than the infrastructure owner (s.4). The Minister creates and amends the Code and prescribes which routes and associated infrastructure the Code covers (s.4, s.5).\n\n- Gives a statutory regulator the job of supervising and enforcing the Code, obtaining information, inspecting premises and documents, setting up arbitration panels, and approving or directing how railway owners separate their access-related activities from other business (definitions and powers: s.3, s.20, s.21, s.22, s.22A, s.29). The Regulator named in the Act is the Economic Regulation Authority (s.3(1), definition of Regulator).\n\n- Requires railway owners to put in place organizational, accounting and confidentiality safeguards so that access-related functions are clearly segregated from their other business, and to keep separate accounts and protect confidential information (s.28–s.34; s.31). The Regulator must approve arrangements to meet these duties and may give binding directions if agreement is not reached (s.29).\n\n- Provides enforcement tools: civil penalties for failing to comply with information requests, obstruction, failure to segregate, or hindering access (see penalties in s.21, s.22B, s.29, s.34A); a system of arbitration and registration of access agreements (s.6, s.36); and injunctive relief by the Supreme Court where arbitration is not available (s.36–s.37). The Act also preserves contractual enforcement of existing access agreements (s.7, s.35).\n\n- Builds in process and review steps: the Code is subsidiary legislation to be tabled in Parliament and is subject to disallowance (s.9); public consultation and a formal review process for the Code are required (s.10, s.12). The Code must be consistent with the Rail Safety National Law (WA) (s.8).\n\nWhat the Act says it aims to do, and how that maps to effects\n\n- The Act states its main object is to \"establish a rail access regime that encourages the efficient use of, and investment in, railway facilities by facilitating a contestable market for rail operations\" (s.2A). Mechanically, it does that by (a) creating a regime for third‑party use of specified infrastructure (s.4), (b) providing dispute-resolution via arbitration and regulator oversight (s.6, s.36), and (c) imposing duties on infrastructure owners to treat access seekers fairly and to segregate access functions (s.28–s.34).\n\n- The Act itself requires the Regulator, when performing functions, to take into account the railway owner’s legitimate business interests and investment, the costs of providing access and extending infrastructure, contractual obligations, and safety and operational requirements (s.20(4)(a)–(f)). That gives statutory weight to balancing incentives to invest against access obligations.\n\nWho pays, who decides, and what behaviour changes\n\n- Who pays: railway owners bear direct compliance costs — setting up segregation arrangements, separate accounting, confidentiality regimes, and responding to information notices (s.28, s.34, s.31, s.21). They also face statutory penalties for non‑compliance (e.g. s.21, s.22B, s.29, s.34A). Access seekers bear the costs of negotiating access agreements, and may be required to pay for use or new investment as provided in agreements and as considered by the Regulator (s.4(2)(a), s.20(4)(c)).\n\n- Who decides: the Minister prescribes the content and coverage of the Code and which routes are subject to access (s.4, s.5). The Regulator administers and enforces the Code, approves segregation arrangements, and has powers to require information and to inspect (s.20, s.21, s.22, s.29). Arbitration panels and arbitrators are provided for under the Code (s.6).\n\n- Behaviour changes: railway owners must negotiate or be subject to arbitration for access, segregate access-related staff and records from other business, and avoid conduct that hinders access (s.28–s.34, s.34A). Access seekers gain a statutory route to proposals for access and arbitration if negotiations fail (s.4(2)(a), s.6, s.36).\n\nKey trade-offs, incentives and implementation risks (source-grounded)\n\n- Balancing investment and access: the Regulator must consider owners’ investment and costs when regulating access (s.20(4)(a)–(c)). That creates an incentive-compatible rule: owners can argue their investment position during determinations, but they must still meet segregation and information obligations that impose ongoing administrative costs (s.28–s.34; s.21).\n\n- Concentrated benefits, diffuse costs: access seekers (often a limited number of operators with specific transport needs) gain preferential entitlement to negotiate access, while railway owners carry the recurring compliance and disclosure burden and face penalty exposure (s.4, s.21, s.31, s.34A).\n\n- Limits on remedies: obligations under the Code are enforceable by arbitration or injunction but, as drafted, a breach of those obligations \"does not give rise to an action for damages\" (s.36(1)). That changes the mix of available remedies and shifts the remedy emphasis toward administrative/arbitral relief (s.36–s.37).\n\n- Administrative discretion and reviewability: the Minister has non‑reviewable discretion in route inclusion decisions (s.5(4)), and the Code is subsidiary legislation subject to parliamentary disallowance (s.9). The combination means important scope choices sit mainly with the Executive and Parliament rather than the courts (s.5(4), s.9).\n\n- Confidentiality and legal privilege: the Act requires protection of confidential information (s.31, s.23) but preserves legal professional privilege (s.22C) and limits admissibility of compelled statements against individuals except for perjury or offences (s.22D). This allocates protection but permits significant regulatory access to books and premises (s.22, s.22A).\n\n- Special pathway for some infrastructure: the Act contains provisions specifically for the TPI Railway and related amendments (s.3(1)(ba), s.3(6), s.11B). The Minister can amend the Code for that railway with some procedural exemptions (s.11B).\n\nPractical effects on markets and private choice\n\n- The regime reduces the exclusivity of railway owners over specified infrastructure by creating negotiated or arbitrated access (s.4, s.6). That can expand opportunities for independent rail operators to enter particular routes, subject to Code coverage and safety rules (s.4(3), s.8).\n\n- The requirement that the Regulator account for owners' costs of providing access (but not costs of losses from increased competition — s.20(4)(b)) means owners may be compensated for direct infrastructure costs while competitive impact on their downstream business is not directly compensated by the Code.\n\n- Contractual status quo preserved: the Act makes clear that the Code does not alter or excuse non‑performance of pre‑existing access agreements entered before the Code commenced (s.7).\n\nOverall, the Act sets a statutory framework that opens prescribed rail infrastructure to third‑party use through regulated negotiation and arbitration, with assigned enforcement powers, organizational and accounting duties for infrastructure owners, and procedural safeguards (consultation, confidentiality, and review). The law balances access and investment by giving statutory weight to owners’ investment interests while imposing administrative and disclosure obligations and providing regulated pathways for access seekers (s.2A; s.20(4))."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/railways-access-act-1998","history":"/api/acts/railways-access-act-1998/history","analysis":"/api/acts/railways-access-act-1998/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/railways-access-act-1998/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/railways-access-act-1998/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/railways-access-act-1998/documents"}}