{"id":"public-interest-disclosure-act-2003","name":"Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003","slug":"public-interest-disclosure-act-2003","collection":"act","jurisdiction":"wa","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":106318,"registerId":"wa-public-interest-disclosure-act-2003-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-03","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003","content":"![Crest]()Western Australia\n\nPublic Interest Disclosure Act 2003\n\nWestern Australia\n\nPublic Interest Disclosure Act 2003\n\nContents\n\nPart 1 — Preliminary\n\n1. Short title 2\n\n2. Commencement 2\n\n3. Terms used 2\n\n4. Crown bound 5\n\nPart 2 — Public interest disclosures\n\nDivision 1 — Disclosures\n\n5. Appropriate disclosure of public interest information, making 6\n\n6. Liability of person disclosing unaffected 8\n\n7A. Disclosure of public interest information to journalist, when may be made 8\n\nDivision 2 — Obligations of a person to whom a disclosure is made\n\n7. Term used: proper authority 9\n\n8. Proper authority’s functions as to disclosed information 9\n\n9. Proper authority’s duties as to matter that might be disclosed 10\n\n10. Proper authority to notify informant of action taken 10\n\n11. Notice under s. 10 not to disclose certain matters 11\n\n12. Duties under this Act of certain persons limited 12\n\nPart 3 — Protection\n\n13. Immunity for person making appropriate disclosure of public interest information 14\n\n14. Detrimental action against informant etc., offence 14\n\n15A. Injunction etc. as to detrimental action 15\n\n15B. Public service employee, relocating to prevent etc. reprisal 15\n\n15. Act of victimisation defined; remedies for 16\n\n16. Disclosure of identity of informant etc. restricted 17\n\n17. Protection of s. 13 forfeited in some cases etc. 19\n\n18A. Disclosure under s. 7A(2) to journalist, application of Part to 20\n\nPart 4 — Role of Public Sector Commissioner\n\n18. Term used: proper authority 21\n\n19. Commissioner’s functions 21\n\n20. Code of minimum standards of conduct etc., establishing etc. 21\n\n21. Guidelines, Commissioner’s duties as to 22\n\n22. Annual report and other reports to Parliament 22\n\nPart 5 — Miscellaneous\n\n23. Principal executive officer of public authority, duties of 23\n\n24. False or misleading disclosure, offence 24\n\n25. Other laws not excluded 24\n\n26. Regulations 24\n\n27. Review of Act 25\n\nNotes\n\nCompilation table 26\n\nDefined terms\n\n  \n\nWestern Australia\n\nPublic Interest Disclosure Act 2003\n\nAn Act to facilitate the disclosure of public interest information, to provide protection for those who make disclosures and for those the subject of disclosures, and, in consequence, to amend various Acts, and for related purposes.\n\n## Part 1 — Preliminary\n\n##### 1. Short title\n\nThis Act may be cited as the *Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003* 1.\n\n##### 2. Commencement\n\n(1) This Act comes into operation on a day fixed by proclamation 1.\n\n(2) Different days may be fixed under subsection (1) for different provisions.\n\n##### 3. Terms used\n\n(1) In this Act, unless the contrary intention appears —\n\nCommissioner means the person holding the office of Public Sector Commissioner established by the *Public Sector Management Act 1994* section 16;\n\nCommissioner of Police means the person holding the office of Commissioner of Police under the *Police Act 1892*;\n\n  Corruption and Crime Commission has the meaning given to ***Commission*** in section 3 of the *Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003*;\n\n  detrimental action includes action causing, comprising, or involving —\n\n(a) injury, damage, or loss; or\n\n(b) intimidation or harassment; or\n\n(c) adverse discrimination, disadvantage, or adverse treatment in relation to a person’s career, profession, employment, trade, or business; or\n\n(d) a reprisal;\n\nenvironment has the same meaning as in the *Environmental Protection Act 1986*;\n\nParliamentary Commissioner means a person for the time being holding the office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administrative Investigations under the *Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1971*;\n\npublic authority means —\n\n(a) a department of the Public Service established under section 35 of the *Public Sector Management Act 1994*;\n\n(b) an organisation specified in column 2 of Schedule 2 to the *Public Sector Management Act 1994*;\n\n(c) a non‑SES organisation within the meaning of that term in section 3(1) of the *Public Sector Management Act 1994*;\n\n(d) a local government, a regional local government or a regional subsidiary;\n\n(e) a body that is established or continued for a public purpose under a written law;\n\n(f) a body that is established by the Governor or a Minister;\n\n(g) any other body or the holder of an office referred to in subsection (2) that is declared by the regulations to be a public authority;\n\n  public interest information means information that tends to show that, in relation to its performance of a public function (either before or after the commencement of this Act), a public authority, a public officer, or a public sector contractor is, has been, or proposes to be, involved in —\n\n(a) improper conduct; or\n\n(b) an act or omission that constitutes an offence under a written law; or\n\n(c) a substantial unauthorised or irregular use of, or substantial mismanagement of, public resources; or\n\n(d) an act done or omission that involves a substantial and specific risk of —\n\n(i) injury to public health; or\n\n(ii) prejudice to public safety; or\n\n(iii) harm to the environment;\n\nor\n\n(e) a matter of administration that can be investigated under section 14 of the *Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1971*;\n\npublic officer means —\n\n(a) a Minister of the Crown; or\n\n(b) a Parliamentary Secretary appointed under section 44A of the *Constitution Acts Amendment Act 1899*; or\n\n(c) a member of either House of Parliament; or\n\n(d) a judicial officer; or\n\n(e) a person who holds an appointment made under the *Police Act 1892* Part I, III, IIIA or IIIB; or\n\n(f) a person authorised under a written law to execute or serve any process of a court or tribunal for remuneration; or\n\n(g) a public service officer within the meaning of the *Public Sector Management Act 1994*; or\n\n(h) a member, officer, or employee of a public authority; or\n\n(i) the holder of —\n\n(i) an office that is established for a public purpose under a written law; or\n\n(ii) an office that is established by the Governor or a Minister;\n\nor\n\n(j) an officer of the Commonwealth who exercises or discharges on behalf of this State a function under a written law; or\n\n(k) any other person holding office under the State of Western Australia;\n\npublic sector contractor means —\n\n(a) a person who, other than as an employee, contracts with a public authority or the State of Western Australia to supply goods or services to or on behalf of the authority or the State or as directed in accordance with the contract; or\n\n(b) a person who, other than as an employee, contracts with a public authority or the State of Western Australia to perform a public function; or\n\n(c) a subcontractor or employee of a person referred to in paragraph (a) or (b) and each person who contracts with another person for the execution of the whole or part of the requirements of a contract referred to in those paragraphs.\n\n(2) The regulations made for the purpose of paragraph (g) of the definition of ***public authority*** in subsection (1) can only declare a body or holder of an office to be a public authority if —\n\n(a) the body or office is established or continued under a written law; or\n\n(b) it is a corporation or association over which control can be exercised by —\n\n(i) the State; or\n\n(ii) a body referred to in paragraph (b), (c), (e) or (f) of that definition; or\n\n(iii) a body or the holder of an office declared by the regulations to be a public authority.\n\n[Section 3 amended: No. 48 of 2003 s. 62; No. 78 of 2003 s. 74(2); No. 59 of 2006 s. 73; No. 77 of 2006 Sch. 1 cl. 136; No. 8 of 2008 s. 18; No. 42 of 2009 s. 22(2) and (3); No. 39 of 2010 s. 82(2); No. 35 of 2014 s. 39; No. 26 of 2016 s. 84.]\n\n##### 4. Crown bound\n\nThis Act binds the Crown in right of the State.\n\n## Part 2 — Public interest disclosures\n\n### Division 1 — Disclosures\n\n##### 5. Appropriate disclosure of public interest information, making\n\n(1) Any person may make an appropriate disclosure of public interest information to a proper authority.\n\n(2) A person makes an appropriate disclosure of public interest information if, and only if, the person who makes the disclosure —\n\n(a) believes on reasonable grounds that the information is true; or\n\n(b) has no reasonable grounds on which to form a belief about the truth of the information but believes on reasonable grounds that the information may be true.\n\n(3) A disclosure of public interest information is made to a proper authority if —\n\n(a) where the information relates to an act or omission that constitutes an offence under a written law — it is made to a police officer or to the Corruption and Crime Commission; or\n\n(b) where the information relates to a substantial unauthorised or irregular use of, or substantial mismanagement of, public resources — it is made to the Auditor General; or\n\n(c) where the information relates to a matter of administration that can be investigated under section 14 of the *Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1971* *—* it is made to the Parliamentary Commissioner or to a person who occupies a position specified under section 23(1)(a) in relation to the public authority concerned; or\n\n(d) where the information relates to a person who holds an appointment made under the *Police Act 1892* Part I, III, IIIA or IIIB — it is made to the Commissioner of Police or to the Corruption and Crime Commission; or\n\n(e) where the information relates to a judicial officer — it is made to the Chief Justice; or\n\n(f) where the information relates to a member of either House of Parliament — it is made to the Presiding Officer of the House of Parliament to which the member belongs; or\n\n(g) where the information relates to a public officer (other than a member of Parliament, a Minister of the Crown, a judicial officer or an officer referred to in Schedule 1 to the *Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1971*) — it is made to the Commissioner or the Parliamentary Commissioner; or\n\n(h) where the information relates to a matter falling within the sphere of responsibility of a public authority — it is made to a person who occupies a position specified under section 23(1)(a) in relation to that authority; or\n\n(i) where the information relates to a person or a matter of a prescribed class — it is made to a person declared by the regulations to be a proper authority for the purposes of subsection (1) in relation to such information.\n\n(4) Where a public interest disclosure falls within 2 or more paragraphs of subsection (3), then it is made to a proper authority if made to any or all of the authorities contemplated by the applicable paragraphs.\n\n(5) A disclosure of public interest information may be made under this Act —\n\n(a) even though anything to which the disclosure relates occurred before the commencement of this Act; and\n\n(b) whether or not the person making the disclosure is able to identify any person whom the information concerns.\n\n(6A) A person may make a disclosure of public interest information anonymously.\n\n(6) Nothing in this Act entitles a person to disclose information that would otherwise be the subject of legal professional privilege.\n\n[Section 5 amended: No. 48 of 2003 s. 62; No. 78 of 2003 s. 74(2); No. 42 of 2009 s. 22(4); No. 31 of 2012 s. 9.]\n\n##### 6. Liability of person disclosing unaffected\n\nA disclosure of public interest information under this Act by a person does not affect that person’s liability for anything to which the information relates.\n\n##### 7A. Disclosure of public interest information to journalist, when may be made\n\n(1) In this section —\n\njournalist means a person engaged in the profession or occupation of journalism in connection with the publication of information in a medium for the dissemination to the public or a section of the public of news and observations on news.\n\n(2) A person may make a disclosure to a journalist of substantially the same information that was the subject of a disclosure of public interest information that the person has already made under this Act if the proper authority to which the disclosure was made, or the person to whom a matter raised by the disclosure was referred under section 9(1)(b) —\n\n(a) has refused to investigate, or has discontinued the investigation of, a matter raised by the disclosure; or\n\n(b) has not completed an investigation of a matter raised by the disclosure within the period ending 6 months after the disclosure was made; or\n\n(c) has completed an investigation of a matter raised by the disclosure but has not recommended the taking of action in respect of the matter; or\n\n(d) has not complied with section 10(1) or (4), if applicable, in relation to the disclosure.\n\n[Section 7A inserted: No. 31 of 2012 s. 15.]\n\n### Division 2 — Obligations of a person to whom a disclosure is made\n\n##### 7. Term used: proper authority\n\nIn sections 8, 9 and 10 —\n\nproper authority means a person to whom an appropriate disclosure of public interest information has been made in accordance with section 5(3), except that it does not include the Chief Justice or the Presiding Officer of a House of Parliament.\n\n##### 8. Proper authority’s functions as to disclosed information\n\n(1) A proper authority must investigate or cause to be investigated the information disclosed to it under this Act if the disclosure relates to —\n\n(a) the authority; or\n\n(b) a public officer or public sector contractor of the authority; or\n\n(c) a matter or person that the authority has a function or power to investigate.\n\n(2) A proper authority may refuse to investigate, or may discontinue the investigation of, a matter raised by the disclosure if it considers that —\n\n(a) the matter is trivial; or\n\n(b) the disclosure is vexatious or frivolous; or\n\n(c) there is no reasonable prospect of obtaining sufficient evidence due to the time that has elapsed since the occurrence of the matter; or\n\n(d) the matter is being or has been adequately or properly investigated by another person to whom an appropriate disclosure of public interest information has been made in accordance with section 5(3).\n\n(3) A proper authority that refuses to investigate, or discontinues the investigation of, a matter raised by a disclosure must give the person who made the disclosure the reason for its refusal.\n\n(4) Subsection (3) does not apply in respect of a person who made an anonymous disclosure.\n\n[Section 8 amended: No. 31 of 2012 s. 10.]\n\n##### 9. Proper authority’s duties as to matter that might be disclosed\n\n(1) If a proper authority forms the opinion that a person may be, may have been, or may in the future be, involved in a matter that may be the subject of a disclosure of public interest information, the proper authority must take such action as is necessary, reasonable, and within its functions and powers, to —\n\n(a) prevent the matter to which the disclosure relates from continuing or occurring in future; or\n\n(b) refer the matter to the Commissioner of Police or another person, body, or organisation having power to investigate the matter; or\n\n(c) take disciplinary action or commence or enable disciplinary proceedings to be commenced against a person responsible for the matter.\n\n(2) Before taking action under subsection (1)(a) or (c) the proper authority is to afford any person against whom, or in respect of whom, the action is to be taken the opportunity to make a submission, either orally or in writing, in relation to the matter.\n\n##### 10. Proper authority to notify informant of action taken\n\n(1) If an appropriate disclosure of public interest information is made to a proper authority, that proper authority must, subject to section 11, not more than 3 months after the disclosure is made, notify the person who made the disclosure of the action taken or proposed to be taken in relation to the disclosure.\n\n(2) A person who has made an appropriate disclosure of public interest information under this Act may request the proper authority to whom the disclosure was made to provide a report on progress on dealing with the matter in relation to which the disclosure was made.\n\n(3) If an investigation into a matter in relation to which the disclosure was made is not complete, the proper authority to whom the disclosure was made may provide a progress report to the person who requested a report on the current status of the investigation.\n\n(4) If an investigation into a matter in relation to which the disclosure was made is complete, the proper authority who carried out the investigation must provide a final report to the person who requested a report stating —\n\n(a) the outcome of the investigation and any action the proper authority has taken or proposes to take as a result of the investigation; and\n\n(b) the reason for taking the action that has been taken or that is proposed to be taken.\n\n(5) Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (4) do not apply in respect of a person who made an anonymous disclosure.\n\n[Section 10 amended: No. 31 of 2012 s. 11.]\n\n##### 11. Notice under s. 10 not to disclose certain matters\n\n(1) A proper authority must not, in a notification or report under section 10, give information that, in that proper authority’s opinion, would be likely to affect adversely —\n\n(a) any person’s safety; or\n\n(b) the investigation of an offence or possible offence; or\n\n(c) necessary confidentiality about the existence or identity of a person who has made a disclosure of public interest information other than the person being given the information.\n\n[(2) deleted]\n\n(3) To avoid doubt, it is declared that information that section 151, 152 or 153 of the *Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003* prevents a person from disclosing is not to be given or disclosed under section 10.\n\n[Section 11 amended: No. 48 of 2003 s. 62 (as amended: No. 78 of 2003 s. 35(13)); No. 78 of 2003 s. 74(2); No. 35 of 2014 s. 39.]\n\n##### 12. Duties under this Act of certain persons limited\n\n(1) The Corruption and Crime Commission and the Parliamentary Commissioner are not required to comply with sections 8(1), 9 and 10 if the disclosure relates to a matter that it is a function of the Corruption and Crime Commission or the Parliamentary Commissioner to investigate, inquire into, deal with, or take any other step with respect to, under another written law, whether on the complaint of a person or on its or his or her own motion.\n\n(2) If a person makes a disclosure of public interest information under this Act to the Parliamentary Commissioner, the *Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1971* section 26 applies as if the disclosure were the making of a complaint under that Act.\n\n(3) If a disclosure of public interest information is made —\n\n(a) to a declared person; and\n\n(b) the information relates to a matter which it is a function of the person to investigate, inquire into, deal with, or take any other step with respect to, under another written law, whether on the complaint of a person or on that person’s own motion,\n\nsections 8(1) and 9 do not apply to that declared person in relation to that disclosure.\n\n(4) If a declared person has a duty under a written law other than this Act to make a progress report to a person who has made a complaint to it —\n\n(a) section 10 does not apply to the declared person; and\n\n(b) a progress report is to be made to any person who disclosed public interest information to that declared person under this Act as if the disclosure were the making of a complaint under that written law.\n\n(5A) Subsection (4)(b) does not apply in respect of a person who made an anonymous disclosure.\n\n(5) In this section —\n\ncomplaint includes an allegation, application, charge, motion, objection, petition, report, request or summons;\n\ndeclared person means a person declared in regulations made for the purposes of paragraph (g) of the definition of ***public authority*** to be a public authority.\n\n[Section 12 amended: No. 48 of 2003 s. 62; No. 78 of 2003 s. 74(2); No. 8 of 2009 s. 104(2); No. 31 of 2012 s. 12.]\n\n## Part 3 — Protection\n\n##### 13. Immunity for person making appropriate disclosure of public interest information\n\nA person who makes an appropriate disclosure of public interest information to a proper authority under section 5 —\n\n(a) incurs no civil or criminal liability for doing so; and\n\n(b) is not, for doing so, liable —\n\n(i) to any disciplinary action under a written law; or\n\n(ii) to be dismissed; or\n\n(iii) to have his or her services dispensed with or otherwise terminated; or\n\n(iv) for any breach of a duty of secrecy or confidentiality or any other restriction on disclosure (whether or not imposed by a written law) applicable to the person.\n\n##### 14. Detrimental action against informant etc., offence\n\n(1) A person must not take or threaten to take detrimental action against another because anyone has made, or intends to make, a disclosure of public interest information under this Act.\n\nPenalty: $24 000 or imprisonment for 2 years.\n\n(2) A person who —\n\n(a) attempts to commit an offence created by subsection (1); or\n\n(b) intending that an offence created by subsection (1) be committed, incites another person to commit that offence,\n\ncommits an offence.\n\nPenalty: $24 000 or imprisonment for 2 years.\n\n##### 15A. Injunction etc. as to detrimental action\n\n(1) A person who believes that detrimental action has been taken or may be taken against him or her in reprisal for a disclosure of public interest information under this Act may apply to the Supreme Court for an order or injunction under this section.\n\n(2) If the Supreme Court, on an application under subsection (1), is satisfied that a person has taken or intends to take detrimental action against the applicant in reprisal for a disclosure of public interest information under this Act, the Court may —\n\n(a) order the person who took the detrimental action to remedy that action; or\n\n(b) grant an injunction in any terms the Court considers appropriate.\n\n(3) The Supreme Court, pending the final determination of an application under subsection (1), may —\n\n(a) make an interim order in the terms of subsection (2)(a); or\n\n(b) grant an interim injunction.\n\n[Section 15A inserted: No. 31 of 2012 s. 7.]\n\n##### 15B. Public service employee, relocating to prevent etc. reprisal\n\n(1) In this section —\n\nemploying authority, in relation to a public service employee, means that person’s employing authority under the *Public Sector Management Act 1994* section 5;\n\norganisation means an organisation as defined in the *Public Sector Management Act 1994* section 3(1);\n\npublic service employee means —\n\n(a) a public service officer; or\n\n(b) an employee employed in an organisation.\n\n(2) A public service employee may apply in writing to his or her employing authority for relocation on the grounds that —\n\n(a) detrimental action has been taken or may be taken against the employee in reprisal for a disclosure of public interest information under this Act; and\n\n(b) the only practical means of removing or substantially removing the danger of a reprisal is to relocate the employee.\n\n(3) If the employing authority is satisfied that the grounds are established it must, as far as practicable, make arrangements to relocate the employee away from the employee’s existing work location whether within the employee’s current department or organisation or to another department or organisation.\n\n(4) Subsection (3) does not authorise the relocation of a public service employee unless the employee consents to the specific arrangements proposed by the employing authority.\n\n[Section 15B inserted: No. 31 of 2012 s. 8.]\n\n##### 15. Act of victimisation defined; remedies for\n\n(1) A person who takes or threatens to take detrimental action against another because or substantially because anyone has made, or intends to make, a disclosure of public interest information under this Act commits an act of victimisation which may be dealt with as a tort.\n\n(2) Proceedings in tort under subsection (1) may be taken against the perpetrator of an act of victimisation or any employer of the perpetrator.\n\n(3) In proceedings against the employer of the perpetrator of an act of victimisation, it is a defence for the employer to prove that the employer —\n\n(a) was not knowingly involved in the act of victimisation; and\n\n(b) did not know and could not reasonably be expected to have known about the act of victimisation; and\n\n(c) could not, by the exercise of reasonable care, have prevented the act of victimisation.\n\n(4) An act of victimisation under this Act may be dealt with under the *Equal Opportunity Act 1984* as if it were an act that was unlawful under section 67 of that Act but, if the victim commences proceedings in a court under subsection (1), he or she cannot subsequently lodge a complaint under the *Equal Opportunity Act 1984* because of the act and, conversely, if the victim lodges a complaint under that Act because of the act, he or she cannot subsequently commence proceedings under subsection (1) because of the act.\n\n(5) If a complaint alleging an act of victimisation under this Act has been lodged with the Commissioner for Equal Opportunity and the Commissioner is of the opinion that the subject matter of the complaint has already been adequately dealt with by a competent authority, the Commissioner may decline to act on the complaint or to proceed further with action on the complaint.\n\n(6) Despite any other provision of this Act, this section has no retrospective operation and no proceeding may be taken under this section in relation to an act of victimisation that occurred before the commencement of this Act.\n\n##### 16. Disclosure of identity of informant etc. restricted\n\n(1) A person must not make a disclosure (an identifying disclosure) of information that might identify or tend to identify anyone as a person who has made an appropriate disclosure of public interest information under this Act unless —\n\n(a) the person who made the disclosure of public interest information consents to the disclosure of information that might identify or tend to identify him or her; or\n\n(b) it is necessary to do so having regard to the rules of natural justice; or\n\n(c) it is necessary to do so to enable the matter to be investigated effectively; or\n\n(d) the disclosure is made in accordance with an order of a court or any other person or body having authority to hear, receive and examine evidence; or\n\n[(e) deleted]\n\n(f) the identifying disclosure is made in accordance with section 152 or 153 of the *Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003*.\n\nPenalty: $24 000 or imprisonment for 2 years.\n\n(2) A reasonable time before making a disclosure in the circumstances described in subsection (1)(b) or (c), the person making the identifying disclosure must take all reasonable steps to advise the person whose identity is to be disclosed —\n\n(a) that the disclosure is to be made; and\n\n(b) the reason for the disclosure being made.\n\n(3A) Subsection (2) does not apply in respect of a person who made an anonymous disclosure.\n\n(3) A person must not make a disclosure of information that might identify or tend to identify anyone as a person in respect of whom a disclosure of public interest information has been made under this Act (identifying information) unless —\n\n(a) the person in respect of whom the disclosure of public interest information has been made consents to the disclosure of information that might identify or tend to identify him or her; or\n\n(b) it is necessary to do so to enable the matter to be investigated effectively; or\n\n(c) it is necessary to do so in the course of taking action under section 9(1)(a) to (c); or\n\n(d) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the disclosure of identifying information is necessary to prevent or minimise the risk of injury to any person or damage to any property; or\n\n(e) the disclosure is made in accordance with an order of a court or any other person or body having authority to hear, receive and examine evidence; or\n\n[(f) deleted]\n\n(g) the disclosure is made in accordance with section 152 or 153 of the *Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003*.\n\nPenalty: $24 000 or imprisonment for 2 years.\n\n[Section 16 amended: No. 48 of 2003 s. 62 (as amended: No. 78 of 2003 s. 35(13)); No. 78 of 2003 s. 74(2); No. 8 of 2009 s. 104(3); No. 31 of 2012 s. 13 and 16; No. 35 of 2014 s. 39.]\n\n##### 17. Protection of s. 13 forfeited in some cases etc.\n\n(1) A person who has made an appropriate disclosure of public interest information under this Act and who —\n\n(a) fails, without reasonable excuse, to assist a person investigating a matter to which the disclosure relates by supplying the person with any information requested, whether orally or in writing, by the person in such manner, and within such period, as is specified by the person making the request; or\n\n(b) discloses information contained in a disclosure of public interest information otherwise than under this Act,\n\nforfeits the protection given by section 13.\n\n(2A) Subsection (1)(a) does not apply in respect of a person who made an anonymous disclosure.\n\n(2) Where a court is considering whether a person has pursuant to subsection (1) forfeited the protection of section 13 and forms the view that the failure or disclosure —\n\n(a) has not materially prejudiced the public interest served by the appropriate disclosure; and\n\n(b) is of a minor nature,\n\nit may make an order relieving the person in whole or part from the forfeiture and may also make such consequential orders necessary to give effect to the order for relief.\n\n[Section 17 amended: No. 31 of 2012 s. 14.]\n\n##### 18A. Disclosure under s. 7A(2) to journalist, application of Part to\n\nA person who makes a disclosure to a journalist in accordance with section 7A(2) is, for the purposes of this Part, to be taken to be a person who makes a disclosure of public interest information.\n\n[Section 18A inserted: No. 31 of 2012 s. 17.]\n\n## Part 4 — Role of Public Sector Commissioner\n\n[Heading inserted: No. 39 of 2010 s. 82(3).]\n\n##### 18. Term used: proper authority\n\nIn this Part —\n\nproper authority means a person to whom an appropriate disclosure of public interest information has been made in accordance with section 5(3), except that it does not include the Chief Justice or the Presiding Officer of a House of Parliament.\n\n##### 19. Commissioner’s functions\n\n(1) The Commissioner is to monitor compliance with —\n\n(a) this Act; and\n\n(b) the code established under section 20.\n\n(2) The Commissioner is to assist public authorities and public officers to comply with this Act and the code established under section 20.\n\n##### 20. Code of minimum standards of conduct etc., establishing etc.\n\n(1) The Commissioner must establish a code setting out minimum standards of conduct and integrity to be complied with by a person to whom a disclosure of public interest information may be made under section 5(3).\n\n(2) In establishing, amending, or repealing and replacing the code, the Commissioner is to take into account the independence that any particular proper authority has under a written law.\n\n(3) The Commissioner may amend, or repeal and replace, the code.\n\n(4) The Commissioner must, before establishing, amending, or repealing and replacing the code, consult such persons as he or she considers it desirable and practicable to consult.\n\n(5) The code must be published in the *Gazette*.\n\n(6) The code comes into operation at the beginning of the day on which it is published in the *Gazette* or of such later day as is specified in the code.\n\n(7) Section 42 of the *Interpretation Act 1984* applies to and in relation to the code as if the code were regulations within the meaning of that section.\n\n(8) Subsections (5) to (7) also apply to an amendment, or repeal and replacement, of the code.\n\n##### 21. Guidelines, Commissioner’s duties as to\n\nThe Commissioner must —\n\n(a) prepare guidelines on internal procedures relating to the functions of a proper authority under this Act; and\n\n(b) ensure that all proper authorities have copies of the guidelines.\n\n##### 22. Annual report and other reports to Parliament\n\n(1) The Commissioner must report annually to each House of Parliament on —\n\n(a) the performance of the Commissioner’s obligations under this Act; and\n\n(b) compliance or non‑compliance with the Act; and\n\n(c) compliance or non‑compliance with the code established under section 20.\n\n(2) Despite subsection (1), the Commissioner may at any time, if he or she thinks fit, lay before each House of Parliament a report on any matter arising in connection with the exercise of his or her functions under this Act.\n\n(3) If either House of Parliament is not sitting at the time when the Commissioner wishes to lay a report under subsection (2) then the Commissioner may —\n\n(a) send copies of the report to the Clerk of that House; and\n\n(b) make the report available to the public.\n\n## Part 5 — Miscellaneous\n\n##### 23. Principal executive officer of public authority, duties of\n\n(1) The principal executive officer of a public authority must —\n\n(a) designate the occupant of a specified position with the authority as the person responsible for receiving disclosures of public interest information; and\n\n(b) provide protection from detrimental action or the threat of detrimental action for any employee of the public authority who makes an appropriate disclosure of public interest information; and\n\n(c) ensure that his or her public authority complies with this Act; and\n\n(d) ensure that his or her public authority complies with the code established by the Commissioner under section 20; and\n\n(e) prepare and publish internal procedures relating to the authority’s obligations under this Act; and\n\n(f) provide information annually to the Commissioner on —\n\n(i) the number of public interest disclosures received by a responsible officer of the authority over the report period; and\n\n(ii) the results of any investigations conducted as a result of the disclosures and the action, if any, taken as a result of each investigation; and\n\n(iii) such other matters as are prescribed.\n\n(2) Internal procedures prepared under subsection (1)(e) must be consistent with guidelines prepared by the Commissioner under section 21.\n\n(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to the Chief Justice or to the Presiding Officer of a House of Parliament.\n\n##### 24. False or misleading disclosure, offence\n\n(1) A person who makes a statement to a proper authority purporting to be a disclosure of public interest information —\n\n(a) knowing it to be false in a material particular or being reckless about whether it is false in a material particular; or\n\n(b) knowing it to be misleading in a material particular or being reckless about whether it is misleading in a material particular,\n\ncommits an offence.\n\nPenalty: $12 000 or imprisonment for one year.\n\n(1a) For the purposes of subsection (1) a statement is made to a proper authority if, were the statement truly a disclosure of public interest information, it is disclosed to a proper authority for the purposes of section 5(3).\n\n(2) A person who makes a statement in contravention of this section is not protected by this Act in respect of that statement, whether or not it is truly a disclosure of public interest information.\n\n[Section 24 amended: No. 48 of 2003 s. 62.]\n\n##### 25. Other laws not excluded\n\nThe protection given by this Act is in addition to, and does not derogate from, any privilege, protection, or immunity existing apart from this Act.\n\n##### 26. Regulations\n\nThe Governor may make regulations prescribing all matters that are required or permitted by this Act to be prescribed, or are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for giving effect to the purposes of this Act.\n\n##### 27. Review of Act\n\n(1) The Minister shall carry out a review of the operation of this Act 3 years after the Act and all of its provisions have been fully proclaimed, and in the course of such review the Minister shall consider and have regard to —\n\n(a) the attainment of the purposes of this Act; and\n\n(b) the administration of this Act; and\n\n(c) such other matters as appear to him to be relevant.\n\n(2) The Minister shall prepare a report based on the review made under subsection (1) and shall as soon as practicable after its preparation, cause the report to be laid before each House of Parliament.\n\n[**28.** Omitted under the Reprints Act 1984 s. 7(4)(e).]\n\n[Schedule 1 omitted under the Reprints Act 1984 s. 7(4)(e).]\n\n![dline]()\n\nNotes\n\n1 This is a compilation of the *Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003* and includes the amendments made by the other written laws referred to in the following table. The table also contains information about any reprint.\n\nCompilation table\n\n| **Short title** | **Number and year** | **Assent** | **Commencement** |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| *Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003* | 29 of 2003 | 22 May 2003 | s. 1 and 2: 22 May 2003;   Act other than s. 1 and 2: 1 Jul 2003 (see s. 2 and *Gazette* 27 Jun 2003 p. 2383) |\n| *Corruption and Crime Commission Act 2003* s. 62 2 | 48 of 2003   (as amended by No. 78 of 2003 s. 35(13)) | 3 Jul 2003 | 1 Jan 2004 (see s. 2 and *Gazette* 30 Dec 2003 p. 5723) |\n| *Corruption and Crime Commission Amendment and Repeal Act 2003* s. 74(2) | 78 of 2003 | 22 Dec 2003 | 7 Jul 2004 (see s. 2 and *Gazette* 6 Jul 2004 p. 2697) |\n| *Criminal Investigation (Consequential Provisions) Act 2006* s. 73 | 59 of 2006 | 16 Nov 2006 | 1 Jul 2007 (see s. 2 and *Gazette* 22 Jun 2007 p. 2838) |\n| *Financial Legislation Amendment and Repeal Act 2006* Sch. 1 cl. 136 | 77 of 2006 | 21 Dec 2006 | 1 Feb 2007 (see s. 2(1) and *Gazette* 19 Jan 2007 p. 137) |\n| **Reprint 1: The *Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003* as at 12 Oct 2007** (includes amendments listed above) | | | |\n| *Police Amendment Act 2008* s. 18 | 8 of 2008 | 31 Mar 2008 | 1 Apr 2008 (see s. 2(1)) |\n| *Statutes (Repeals and Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 2009* s. 104 | 8 of 2009 | 21 May 2009 | 22 May 2009 (see s. 2(b)) |\n| *Police Amendment Act 2009* s. 22 | 42 of 2009 | 3 Dec 2009 | 13 Mar 2010 (see s. 2(b) and *Gazette* 12 Mar 2010 p. 941) |\n| *Public Sector Reform Act 2010* s. 82 | 39 of 2010 | 1 Oct 2010 | 1 Dec 2010 (see s. 2(b) and *Gazette* 5 Nov 2010 p. 5563) |\n| *Evidence and Public Interest Disclosure Legislation Amendment Act 2012* Pt. 3 | 31 of 2012 | 2 Oct 2012 | 21 Nov 2012 (see s. 2(b) and *Gazette* 20 Nov 2012 p. 5685) |\n| **Reprint 2: The *Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003* as at 1 Feb 2013** (includes amendments listed above) | | | |\n| *Corruption and Crime Commission Amendment (Misconduct) Act 2014* s. 39 | 35 of 2014 | 9 Dec 2014 | 1 Jul 2015 (see s. 2(b) and *Gazette* 26 Jun 2015 p. 2235) |\n| *Local Government Legislation Amendment Act 2016* Pt. 3 Div. 29 | 26 of 2016 | 21 Sep 2016 | 21 Jan 2017 (see s. 2(b) and *Gazette* 20 Jan 2017 p. 648) |\n\n\n2 The *Corruption and Crime Commission Act 2003* Sch. 3 was renumbered as Sch. 4 by the *Corruption and Crime Commission Amendment and Repeal Act 2003* s. 35(12) and the reference to it in s. 62 was amended by the *Corruption and Crime Commission Amendment and Repeal Act 2003* s. 35(13).\n\nDefined terms\n\n*[This is a list of terms defined and the provisions where they are defined. The list is not part of the law.]*\n\n**Defined term Provision(s)**\n\nCommissioner 3(1)\n\nCommissioner of Police 3(1)\n\ncomplaint 12(5)\n\nCorruption and Crime Commission 3(1)\n\ndeclared person 12(5)\n\ndetrimental action 3(1)\n\nemploying authority 15B(1)\n\nenvironment 3(1)\n\nidentifying disclosure 16(1)\n\nidentifying information 16(3)\n\njournalist 7A(1)\n\norganisation 15B(1)\n\nParliamentary Commissioner 3(1)\n\nproper authority 7, 18\n\npublic authority 3(1)\n\npublic interest information 3(1)\n\npublic officer 3(1)\n\npublic sector contractor 3(1)\n\npublic service employee 15B(1)\n","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The text as compiled shows that the Act's operational scope has been broadened and detailed by later insertions and amendments. Notable scope expansions include: introduction of a limited pathway for making the same information public via a journalist where official channels have failed or delayed (s.7A; s.18A); new court remedies for reprisals (injunctions under s.15A) and a statutory relocation mechanism for public service employees at risk of reprisal (s.15B); clarification and limitation of duties where other investigative agencies have statutory roles (s.12); and the formalisation of the Public Sector Commissioner’s role in setting a code, issuing guidelines and reporting (s.19–22). These amendments add new protective measures, procedural routes, and oversight obligations compared with the original, simpler structure of investigatory duties and discloser immunity."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple detailed definitions that determine coverage (e.g. \"public authority\", \"public officer\", \"public sector contractor\", \"public interest information\") (s.3) — these require careful mapping to real entities and roles.","Subject‑matter routing to different proper authorities depending on the type of information (police, Auditor‑General, Parliamentary Commissioner, Corruption and Crime Commission, Chief Justice, Presiding Officer, Public Sector Commissioner, or declared persons) (s.5(3)) creates operational complexity.","Numerous exceptions, limits and cross‑references to other Acts (Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1971; Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003; Public Sector Management Act 1994; Environmental Protection Act 1986) that alter duties and disclosure rules (s.3 definitions; s.11(3); s.12).","Discretion built into investigatory duties (proper authority may refuse or discontinue investigation on multiple grounds) and duties to take \"necessary, reasonable, and within its functions and powers\" action (s.8(2); s.9(1)) — this produces variable outcomes across authorities.","Multiple remedies and sanctions across civil, criminal and administrative law (s.13 immunity; s.14 offence; s.15A injunctions; s.15 tort remedies; s.24 false disclosure) increase procedural pathways and legal complexity.","Special provisions for anonymity, loss of protection where discloser fails to assist, and different treatment of anonymous disclosures (s.5(6A); s.10(5); s.17) complicate practical handling of disclosures.","Added pathways and limits for secondary disclosure to journalists with conditions (s.7A; s.18A) introduce conditional public‑interest release rules that must be assessed case by case.","Obligations on public authorities to establish internal procedures, designate receiving officers, and report annually to the Commissioner (s.23(1)(a),(e),(f); s.20–22) produce ongoing compliance work.","Penalties and criminal exposure for identifying informants or making false disclosures (s.16; s.24) require careful legal screening before disclosure and reporting.","Amendments and inserted sections over time (as reflected in the compilation history) add layers of specific provisions (e.g. s.7A, s.15A, s.15B, s.18A), increasing interpretive tasks for practitioners."],"plain_english_summary":"# What this law does, who it affects, and how it works\n\nThis Act sets up a process for members of the public, public officers and contractors to report information that they reasonably believe shows wrongdoing, misuse of public resources, risks to health or safety, environmental harm, or matters of public administration (see definition of \"public interest information\", s.3). It then specifies where those reports must be made, what the recipients must do, what protections the reporter gets, and what penalties apply for misuse or improper disclosure.\n\n- Who may disclose and to whom: Any person may make an \"appropriate disclosure\" (s.5(1)). The Act directs disclosures to the relevant \"proper authority\" depending on the subject matter — for example, police or the Corruption and Crime Commission for criminal matters (s.5(3)(a)); the Auditor‑General for serious misuse of resources (s.5(3)(b)); the Parliamentary Commissioner for matters of administration (s.5(3)(c)); the Commissioner of Police for police appointments (s.5(3)(d)); Chief Justice or Presiding Officer for judges or MPs (s.5(3)(e)–(f)); and the Public Sector Commissioner or Parliamentary Commissioner for many public officers (s.5(3)(g)). The regulations may declare other proper authorities for prescribed classes of matters (s.5(3)(i)).\n\n- What a \"proper authority\" must do: If a disclosure concerns the authority itself, its officers or matters it can investigate, the authority must investigate or cause investigation (s.8(1)). The authority may refuse or stop investigating for set reasons (triviality, vexatiousness, time elapsed, or because another appropriate authority is handling it) and must give reasons to the discloser when it refuses or discontinues (s.8(2)–(3)). If the authority forms the view a person may be involved in a disclosable matter, it must take reasonable action within its powers to stop the problem, refer it to a competent investigator, or commence disciplinary steps (s.9(1)). The authority must give the discloser a notification about action taken or proposed within 3 months, subject to confidentiality and safety limits (s.10(1); s.11).\n\n- Protections for disclosers: A person who makes an appropriate disclosure to a proper authority is immune from civil or criminal liability for doing so and is protected from disciplinary action, dismissal or termination for making the disclosure (s.13). The Act also makes it an offence to take or threaten \"detrimental action\" (a defined term covering injury, intimidation, adverse treatment, reprisals, etc.) against someone because they have made or intend to make such a disclosure (s.14). The discloser may seek injunctions in the Supreme Court if they believe detrimental action has been taken or may be taken (s.15A). Public service employees who need to be relocated to avoid reprisals may apply to their employing authority for relocation; the authority must relocate them where practicable and with the employee's consent to specific arrangements (s.15B).\n\n- Limits on protection and duties of disclosers: Immunity can be forfeited if the discloser, without reasonable excuse, fails to assist investigators when requested or if the discloser makes the same information public outside the Act (s.17(1)). Anonymous disclosures are permitted (s.5(6A)), but some reporting and assistance duties and notices differ or do not apply in respect of anonymous disclosures (see s.10(5), s.17(2A)). A disclosure does not remove any existing legal liability the discloser may have in relation to the facts disclosed (s.6).\n\n- Rules about secondary disclosure and journalists: A person who has already made a disclosure under the Act may, in certain circumstances, disclose substantially the same information to a journalist (s.7A(2)). Those circumstances include where the proper authority refused or discontinued an investigation, failed to complete an investigation within 6 months, completed an investigation but did not recommend action, or failed to comply with required notifications (s.7A(2)(a)–(d)). A disclosure to a journalist under those conditions is treated, for Part 3 protections and obligations, as if it were a disclosure under the Act (s.18A).\n\n- Confidentiality and identity protections: The Act restricts identifying disclosures — that is, revealing who made a disclosure or who is the subject of a disclosure — except where consent, natural justice, effective investigation, court order, or specified statutory provisions allow it (s.16). Unauthorised identifying disclosures carry criminal penalties (s.16(1), (3)). The Act also cross‑references confidentiality protections under the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act (s.11(3); s.16(1)(f), (3)(g)).\n\n- Offences and false disclosures: Making a false or materially misleading statement as a disclosure to a proper authority is an offence (s.24). Taking detrimental action against a discloser is an offence (s.14) with specified monetary and prison penalties. Disclosure of information subject to legal professional privilege is excluded (s.5(6)).\n\n- Oversight, standards and reporting: The Public Sector Commissioner must monitor compliance with the Act and the code of minimum standards the Commissioner establishes for persons who may receive disclosures (s.19–20). The Commissioner must publish a code, prepare guidelines on internal procedures (s.21), and report annually to Parliament on compliance and related matters (s.22). Principal executive officers of public authorities must designate an officer to receive disclosures, provide protection for employees who disclose, prepare internal procedures consistent with the Commissioner’s guidelines, and provide annual data to the Commissioner (s.23).\n\nWhy this matters (official purpose and practical trade‑offs)\n\n- Official purpose: The Act is drafted to facilitate reporting of public interest information and to protect those who report it (long title; s.3 definition). It sets out a formal channel and protections so that public‑sector and related misconduct, risks and maladministration can be identified and addressed.\n\n- Implementation and incentive effects (mechanical consequences):\n  - Who pays and who acts: Public authorities (and ultimately the State) bear the direct administrative cost of receiving, investigating and reporting on disclosures (s.8, s.10, s.23(1)(f)). Employers may face civil liability for acts of victimisation by employees (s.15(2)–(3)). Individuals who improperly identify informants or make false disclosures may face fines or imprisonment (s.16; s.24). Courts may be involved when injunctions are sought (s.15A).\n  - Compliance burden: Authorities must establish designated officers, publish internal procedures, follow Commissioner guidelines, and provide annual reports to the Commissioner (s.20–23). That imposes ongoing administrative and record‑keeping tasks (s.23(1)(a),(e),(f)).\n  - Discretion and implementation risk: Proper authorities have explicit discretion to refuse or discontinue investigations in set circumstances (s.8(2)), and the Commissioner has discretion in making the code and in monitoring compliance (s.20(2)–(4); s.19). Those discretions create routes where matters may not proceed and create reputational or legal risk if exercised poorly. The Act limits duties for bodies that already have investigative functions under other laws (s.12), which channels matters according to existing institutional roles.\n  - Incentives for reporters and third parties: The immunity provision (s.13) and the offence against detrimental action (s.14) reduce the immediate penal and employment‑related disincentives to reporting. However, protections can be forfeited by certain conduct (s.17), and anonymous reporters receive less feedback (s.10(5)). The limited pathway for disclosing to journalists (s.7A) creates a conditional external route if official processes stall.\n\nIn short: this Act creates defined channels, duties and protections to encourage reporting of public interest problems, assigns responsibilities to particular public bodies to act, builds in confidentiality and criminal penalties to protect identities, requires internal procedures and oversight by the Public Sector Commissioner, and establishes remedies including civil torts and court injunctions where reprisals occur. The main trade‑offs are administrative and legal costs for public authorities, the exercise of investigatory discretion with associated implementation risk, and calibrated limits on secondary public disclosures (journalists) and on forfeiture of protection (s.17)."},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The original 2003 Act focused on internal disclosures to designated proper authorities. Significant amendments in 2012 (Act No. 31 of 2012) expanded the scope substantially by adding section 7A, which permits external disclosure to journalists under specific conditions—effectively creating a 'public interest override' when internal processes fail. This transformed the Act from a purely internal administrative mechanism into a hybrid system with media engagement capabilities. Additionally, the 2012 amendments introduced workplace relocation rights (section 15B) and Supreme Court injunction powers (section 15A), broadening the protective remedies beyond the original framework."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple overlapping definitions of 'proper authority' in different Parts (sections 7 and 18) with subtle exclusions (Chief Justice and Presiding Officers excluded in some contexts but not others)","Nested conditional logic for determining where to make disclosures—section 5(3) contains 9 different pathways depending on the subject matter, with cross-references to other Acts (Police Act, Parliamentary Commissioner Act, etc.)","Extensive cross-referencing to external legislation (Public Sector Management Act, Corruption and Crime Commission Act, Parliamentary Commissioner Act, Environmental Protection Act, Equal Opportunity Act, Interpretation Act)","Conditional protections and forfeiture mechanisms—section 17 creates exceptions to immunity where whistleblowers fail to cooperate or make unauthorised disclosures, with judicial discretion to relieve forfeiture","Dual enforcement mechanisms for victimisation—criminal penalties (section 14), civil tort remedies (section 15), Equal Opportunity Act overlap (section 15(4)), and Supreme Court injunctions (section 15A)","Anonymous disclosure provisions create parallel but slightly different procedural rules (exemptions from notification requirements in sections 8(4), 10(5), 12(5A), 16(3A), 17(2A))","Regulatory delegation powers allowing expansion of scope (section 3(1)(g) and 3(2) allow regulations to declare additional public authorities; section 5(3)(i) allows prescription of additional proper authorities)","Specific carve-outs for existing investigative bodies (Corruption and Crime Commission, Parliamentary Commissioner) that modify standard duties under the Act (section 12)"],"plain_english_summary":"**What this law does:**\n\nThis is Western Australia's \"whistleblower protection\" law. It creates a safe, legal pathway for people to report wrongdoing in the public sector without fear of retaliation.\n\n**Who it affects:**\n\n*   **Whistleblowers:** Any person (including public servants, contractors, or members of the public) who reports \"public interest information\"—meaning serious misconduct, corruption, misuse of public money, dangers to public health/safety, or environmental harm.\n*   **Public authorities:** Government departments, local councils, police, courts, and other public bodies.\n*   **Proper authorities:** Specific bodies designated to receive complaints (e.g., Corruption and Crime Commission, Auditor General, Parliamentary Commissioner, Police Commissioner, or internal agency officers).\n\n**Key protections and processes:**\n\n*   **Immunity:** People who make \"appropriate disclosures\" (reports made in good faith to the right authority) are protected from civil lawsuits, criminal charges, disciplinary action, or dismissal.\n*   **Confidentiality:** It is a criminal offence (up to 2 years jail or $24,000 fine) to reveal a whistleblower's identity without consent, unless necessary for investigation or court proceedings.\n*   **Anti-reprisal measures:** It is illegal to punish or threaten someone for making a disclosure. Victims can seek court injunctions, sue for damages, or request workplace relocation.\n*   **External disclosure:** If internal investigations fail or stall, whistleblowers may go to journalists after specific conditions are met (e.g., 6-month delay with no action).\n*   **Oversight:** The Public Sector Commissioner monitors compliance, sets a code of conduct, and reports annually to Parliament.\n\n**Why it matters:**\n\nThe law tries to balance transparency with accountability. It encourages people to expose serious problems in government while protecting them from career destruction. It also ensures agencies must investigate complaints properly and report back to complainants within 3 months."},"summary":{"complexity_score":1,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"Scope cannot be assessed — the legislative text was not available for analysis. Only a broken URL error message was provided."},"complexity_factors":["No legislative text was retrievable — only a 404-style error page was provided","Cannot assess complexity without substantive content","Score of 1 reflects absence of data, not simplicity of the underlying law"],"plain_english_summary":"## ⚠️ Content Unavailable\n\nThe text of the **Public Interest Disclosure Act 2003 (WA)** could not be retrieved — the page no longer exists at the provided URL due to a website migration or system upgrade.\n\n**What we know from the title alone:**\nThis is a Western Australian law dealing with *public interest disclosures* — commonly known as **whistleblower protections**. Laws like this generally:\n- Allow public servants and sometimes others to report wrongdoing (corruption, misconduct, danger to public health/safety) without fear of losing their job or facing other retaliation\n- Set out who qualifies for protection, what kind of disclosures are covered, and how complaints are handled\n\n**To access the actual legislation**, visit the Western Australian legislation website at [legislation.wa.gov.au](https://www.legislation.wa.gov.au) and search for the Act directly."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/public-interest-disclosure-act-2003","history":"/api/acts/public-interest-disclosure-act-2003/history","analysis":"/api/acts/public-interest-disclosure-act-2003/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/public-interest-disclosure-act-2003/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/public-interest-disclosure-act-2003/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/public-interest-disclosure-act-2003/documents"}}