{"id":"nsw:sl-2020-0746","name":"Personal Injury Commission Regulation 2020","slug":"personal-injury-commission-regulation-2020","collection":"regulation","jurisdiction":"nsw","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"746 of 2020","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":176376,"registerId":"nsw-nsw:sl-2020-0746-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-05","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"Part 1","sectionType":"part","heading":"Preliminary","content":"# Part 1 Preliminary\n\nPart 1 Preliminary","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Name of Regulation","content":"#### 1 Name of Regulation\n\n1 Name of Regulation\n\n> This Regulation is the [Personal Injury Commission Regulation 2020](/view/html/inforce/current/sl-2020-0746).","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"2","sectionType":"section","heading":"Commencement","content":"#### 2 Commencement\n\n2 Commencement\n\n> This Regulation commences on the establishment day and is required to be published on the NSW legislation website.","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"3","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definition","content":"#### 3 Definition\n\n3 Definition\n\n> In this Regulation—\n> \n> the Act means the [Personal Injury Commission Act 2020](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2020-018).\n> \n> Note—\n> \n> The Act and the [Interpretation Act 1987](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1987-015) contain definitions and other provisions that affect the interpretation and application of this Regulation.","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"Part 2","sectionType":"part","heading":"Medical assessors, merit reviewers and mediators","content":"# Part 2 Medical assessors, merit reviewers and mediators\n\nPart 2 Medical assessors, merit reviewers and mediators","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"4","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definition","content":"#### 4 Definition\n\n4 Definition\n\n> In this Part—\n> \n> decision-maker has the same meaning as in Division 4.1 of the Act.","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"5","sectionType":"section","heading":"Appointment of decision-makers and mediators","content":"#### 5 Appointment of decision-makers and mediators\n\n5 Appointment of decision-makers and mediators\n\n> > (1) For the purposes of sections 33(1) and 39(1) of the Act, the President may, by written instrument given to a person, appoint the person as a decision-maker or mediator.\n> \n> > (2) The instrument of appointment must include the following information—\n> > \n> > > (a) the term for which the person has been appointed,\n> > \n> > > (b) the type of appointment, including whether the person is appointed on a full-time basis or some other basis,\n> > \n> > > (c) for the appointment of a person as a medical assessor, whether the person is appointed for the purposes of—\n> > > \n> > > > (i) the [Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1998-086), or\n> > > \n> > > > (ii) the [Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2017-010), or\n> > > \n> > > > (iii) the [Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1999-041), or\n> > > \n> > > > (iv) any combination of the Acts referred to in subparagraphs (i)–(iii),\n> > \n> > > (d) for the appointment of a person as a medical assessor, whether the person is appointed as a senior medical assessor,\n> > \n> > > (e) the restrictions of the appointment, if any.\n> \n> > (3) A decision-maker holds office for the period specified by the President in the instrument of appointment of the decision-maker, unless sooner removed from office.\n> > \n> > Note—\n> > \n> > Section 39(4) of the Act provides for the period in which a mediator may hold office.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"6","sectionType":"section","heading":"Criteria for appointment of medical assessors","content":"#### 6 Criteria for appointment of medical assessors\n\n6 Criteria for appointment of medical assessors\n\n> For the purposes of section 65(2)(a) of the Act, a person is eligible for appointment as a medical assessor if the person is—\n> \n> > (a) a registered health practitioner or a medical practitioner within the meaning of the [Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW)](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2009-86a), but only if the practitioner does not have a condition imposed against the practitioner’s registration as a result of disciplinary proceedings under that Law, and\n> \n> > (b) a member of an Australian or Australasian medical college, faculty or other Australian or Australasian health profession body, and\n> \n> > (c) in the opinion of the President, suitably qualified and has the necessary skills and expertise to exercise the functions of a medical assessor in relation to the Act or the enabling legislation.","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"7","sectionType":"section","heading":"Criteria for appointment of mediators","content":"#### 7 Criteria for appointment of mediators\n\n7 Criteria for appointment of mediators\n\n> For the purposes of sections 65(2)(a) of the Act, a person is eligible for appointment as a mediator if, in addition to the requirements referred to in section 39(2)(a) of the Act, the person is an accredited mediator under the National Mediator Accreditation System.\n> \n> Note—\n> \n> Section 39 of the Act sets out other requirements for the appointment of persons as mediators, including the circumstances in which a person is qualified to be appointed as a mediator.","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"Part 3","sectionType":"part","heading":"Federal proceedings","content":"# Part 3 Federal proceedings\n\nPart 3 Federal proceedings","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"Division 1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Preliminary","content":"## Division 1 Preliminary\n\nDivision 1 Preliminary","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"8","sectionType":"section","heading":"Interpretation","content":"#### 8 Interpretation\n\n8 Interpretation\n\n> > (1) Words and expressions used in this Part have the same meaning as in Division 3.2 of the Act.\n> \n> > (2) To avoid doubt, this Part does not limit the application of the enabling legislation to substituted proceedings unless otherwise modified by this Part.","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"Division 2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Modifications in connection with substituted proceedings","content":"## Division 2 Modifications in connection with substituted proceedings\n\nDivision 2 Modifications in connection with substituted proceedings","sortOrder":12},{"sectionNumber":"9","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of Division","content":"#### 9 Application of Division\n\n9 Application of Division\n\n> For the purposes of sections 28(1)(e) and 29 of the Act, this Division sets out the fees and costs payable and other modifications in connection with substituted proceedings.\n> \n> Note—\n> \n> The enabling legislation, including regulations made under the enabling legislation, further provides for fees and costs in connection with substituted proceedings.","sortOrder":13},{"sectionNumber":"10","sectionType":"section","heading":"Modification of certain pre-conditions before commencement of proceedings","content":"#### 10 Modification of certain pre-conditions before commencement of proceedings\n\n10 Modification of certain pre-conditions before commencement of proceedings\n\n> Section 108 of the [Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1999-041) and section 6.31 of the [Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2017-010) do not apply to compensation matter applications or substituted proceedings.","sortOrder":14},{"sectionNumber":"11","sectionType":"section","heading":"Costs payable in relation to claims for statutory benefits","content":"#### 11 Costs payable in relation to claims for statutory benefits\n\n11 Costs payable in relation to claims for statutory benefits\n\n> > (1) Part 8 of the [Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2017-010), including regulations made under that Part, applies to substituted proceedings involving a claim for statutory benefits to which the [Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2017-010) applies, except as otherwise modified by this clause.\n> > \n> > Note—\n> > \n> > Part 8 of the [Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2017-010), among other things, provides that an insurer is not entitled to recover from a claimant for statutory benefits any costs of the insurer in relation to the claim.\n> \n> > (2) The maximum costs set out in Schedule 1 of the [Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017](/view/html/inforce/current/sl-2017-0498) do not apply in relation to substituted proceedings to which this clause applies.\n> \n> > (3) Despite section 8.3(4) of the [Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2017-010), an Australian legal practitioner is entitled to be paid or recover legal costs for legal services provided to a claimant in connection with claim for statutory benefits only if—\n> > \n> > > (a) the costs are payable on a party and party basis, and\n> > \n> > > (b) the District Court orders payment of the costs.","sortOrder":15},{"sectionNumber":"12","sectionType":"section","heading":"Costs payable in relation to motor accidents claims for damages","content":"#### 12 Costs payable in relation to motor accidents claims for damages\n\n12 Costs payable in relation to motor accidents claims for damages\n\n> > (1) Part 8 of the [Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2017-010), including regulations made under that Part, applies to substituted proceedings involving a claim for damages to which the [Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017](/view/html/inforce/current/act-2017-010) applies, except as otherwise modified by this clause.\n> \n> > (2) The maximum costs set out in Schedule 1 of the [Motor Accident Injuries Regulation 2017](/view/html/inforce/current/sl-2017-0498) do not apply in relation to substituted proceedings to which this clause applies.","sortOrder":16},{"sectionNumber":"13","sectionType":"section","heading":"Costs payable in relation to claims for other motor accidents claims for damages","content":"#### 13 Costs payable in relation to claims for other motor accidents claims for damages\n\n13 Costs payable in relation to claims for other motor accidents claims for damages\n\n> > (1) Chapter 6 of the [Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999](/view/html/inforce/current/act-1999-041), including regulations made under that Chapter, applies to substituted proceedings involving a claim for damages to which that Act applies, except as otherwise modified by this clause.\n> \n> > (2) The maximum costs set out in Schedule 1 of the [Motor Accidents Compensation Regulation 2020](/view/html/inforce/current/sl-2020-0491) do not apply in relation to substituted proceedings to which this clause applies.","sortOrder":17},{"sectionNumber":"Part 4","sectionType":"part","heading":"Miscellaneous","content":"# Part 4 Miscellaneous\n\nPart 4 Miscellaneous","sortOrder":18},{"sectionNumber":"14","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definition of “relevant Commission officer”","content":"#### 14 Definition of “relevant Commission officer”\n\n14 Definition of “relevant Commission officer”\n\n> For the purposes of paragraph (e) of the definition of relevant Commission officer in section 5(1) of the Act, a member of staff of the Commission who, at the direction of the President, exercises a function of the Commission under Schedule 3, clause 9 of the Act is prescribed.","sortOrder":19},{"sectionNumber":"15","sectionType":"section","heading":"Repeal of Schedule","content":"#### 15 Repeal of Schedule\n\n15 Repeal of Schedule\n\n> Schedule 1 to this Regulation is repealed on the day after the establishment day.","sortOrder":20},{"sectionNumber":"Schedule 1","sectionType":"schedule","heading":null,"content":"# Schedule 1\n\nSchedule 1 (Repealed)\n\n**sch 1:** Rep 2020 (746), cl 15.","sortOrder":21}],"analysis":{"summary":{"complexity_score":3,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"Based on the available metadata, there is no indication that the scope of the regulation changed from its original intent. It was made in December 2020 and has only one amendment (effective 2 March 2021), suggesting minor technical or administrative adjustments rather than any fundamental shift in purpose or coverage."},"complexity_factors":["The document provided is primarily website metadata and navigation content rather than the substantive text of the regulation, making meaningful legal analysis limited","Regulations supporting tribunal/commission operations can involve procedural complexity, but without the full text this cannot be fully assessed","The automatic staged repeal mechanism under the Subordinate Legislation Act 1989 adds a temporal dimension to consider","The regulation sits within a broader legislative framework involving both workers' compensation and motor accidents schemes, which are themselves complex"],"plain_english_summary":"## Personal Injury Commission Regulation 2020 (NSW)\n\n**What is this?**\nThis is a NSW regulation (a set of detailed rules made under a broader law) that supports the operation of the **Personal Injury Commission** — the body that handles disputes about workers' compensation and motor accident injury claims in New South Wales.\n\n**Who does it affect?**\n- Workers injured on the job who are disputing decisions about their compensation\n- People injured in motor vehicle accidents disputing their injury claims\n- Insurers and employers involved in those disputes\n- Legal practitioners and other professionals appearing before the Commission\n\n**Why does it matter?**\nThe Personal Injury Commission is the main place where injured people go to resolve disputes with insurers. This regulation sets out the practical rules for how that process works — things like procedures, timeframes, and administrative requirements. Without these rules, the Commission couldn't function properly.\n\n**Important note — expiry date:**\nThis regulation is scheduled to be **automatically repealed (cancelled) on 1 September 2026** under NSW's system of reviewing subordinate legislation (detailed rules made under a main Act). This means it has a built-in expiry unless renewed.\n\n**Limitation of this analysis:**\nThe document provided is largely a navigation/metadata page from the NSW legislation website rather than the full text of the regulation itself. The actual detailed provisions (the specific rules) are not included here, so a complete analysis of what the regulation requires in practice is not possible from this text alone."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The Regulation explicitly modifies how existing motor accident and statutory benefit provisions apply to substituted proceedings: it removes certain preconditions (s 10), applies Part 8/Chapter 6 of the motor accident Acts to substituted proceedings while removing the usual maximum costs caps for those substituted proceedings (ss 11–13), and narrows circumstances in which legal practitioners may recover costs for statutory benefit claims (s 11(3)). It also formalises appointment mechanics and eligibility for Commission decision‑makers, medical assessors and mediators (ss 5–7), and prescribes specified Commission staff as relevant officers (s 14). These are substantive scope modifications of the enabling legislation’s application to substituted proceedings and to appointment processes."},"complexity_factors":["Frequent cross‑references to multiple enabling Acts (Personal Injury Commission Act 2020; Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017; Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 and their regulations) increasing interpretive layering (ss 3, 8, 9, 11–13).","Mixture of procedural, appointment and cost rules spread across Parts and Divisions — readers must track appointments (ss 5–7) separately from substituted proceedings cost modifications (ss 9–13).","Discretionary criteria requiring subjective judgment by the President (s 5; s 6(c)), creating factual assessment points not resolved by bright‑line rules.","Conditional removal or modification of existing caps and preconditions (ss 10–13) requiring comparison with the referenced Schedules and provisions to know the net effect.","Different cost‑recovery regimes applied depending on claim type (statutory benefits vs damages) and the additional constraint that recovery may require a District Court order (s 11(3)).","Transitional language (repeal of Schedule 1 the day after establishment) adds timing considerations for implementation (s 15)."],"plain_english_summary":"### What this Regulation does (mechanical changes first)\n\n- Names the instrument the Personal Injury Commission Regulation 2020 and sets its commencement on the Commission's establishment day (ss 1–2).\n- Supplies a short definition tying the Regulation to the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 (s 3).\n- Prescribes how the President appoints decision-makers and mediators and what must appear in the written instrument of appointment (term, appointment type, whether full‑time, for medical assessors which enabling Acts the appointment covers, seniority and any restrictions) and confirms that appointees hold office for the term in their instrument unless removed sooner (s 5).\n- Sets eligibility criteria for medical assessors (must be a registered health or medical practitioner without a registration condition imposed after disciplinary proceedings, a member of an Australian/Australasian medical college or similar body, and in the President's opinion suitably qualified) (s 6).\n- Requires mediators to meet the Act's mediator requirements and be accredited under the National Mediator Accreditation System (s 7).\n- For substituted proceedings (a cross‑reference to the Act's Division 3.2 applies):\n  - Declares that the Division sets fees, costs and other modifications for substituted proceedings (s 9).\n  - Removes specified preconditions in two motor accident Acts from applying to compensation matter applications or substituted proceedings (s 10).\n  - Applies Part 8 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 to substituted proceedings involving statutory benefit claims, but removes the Regulation's usual maximum costs cap for substituted proceedings and restricts when a legal practitioner can recover costs (party‑and‑party basis and only if ordered by the District Court) (s 11).\n  - Applies Part 8 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 to substituted proceedings for damages but removes the usual maximum costs cap for substituted proceedings (s 12).\n  - Applies Chapter 6 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 to substituted proceedings for other motor accident damages but removes the usual maximum costs cap for substituted proceedings (s 13).\n- Prescribes that certain Commission staff who exercise functions under Schedule 3, clause 9 of the Act at the President's direction are “relevant Commission officers” (s 14).\n- Repeals Schedule 1 to this Regulation on the day after the establishment day (s 15).\n\n### Who is affected\n\n- Claimants in personal injury and motor accident matters (affected by changes to preconditions and cost rules) (ss 10–13).\n- Insurers involved in motor accident statutory benefit claims and damages claims (cost recovery rules are modified by applying Part 8 / Chapter 6 to substituted proceedings and by removal of maximum cost caps) (ss 11–13 and associated notes).\n- Legal practitioners representing claimants (their entitlement to recover legal costs in substituted statutory benefit claims is limited to party‑and‑party costs and requires a District Court order) (s 11(3)).\n- Medical practitioners who might be appointed as medical assessors (eligibility conditions specify registration status, professional membership and the President’s view of suitability) (s 6).\n- Mediators (must meet Act requirements and be nationally accredited) (s 7).\n- The President of the Commission (powers to appoint, set terms and impose restrictions; discretion to determine suitability) (s 5; s 6(c)).\n- Commission staff who perform functions under Schedule 3, clause 9 at the President's direction (prescribed as relevant officers) (s 14).\n\n### Why this matters (official effects claimed and practical mechanics)\n\n- The Regulation implements detailed procedural and cost rules for how the Commission and related substituted proceedings operate in relation to motor accident and workers' compensation enabling legislation. That is the Regulation's stated operational role (see s 9 and the cross references in ss 11–13).\n\n- The Regulation changes who can recover what costs and on what basis in substituted proceedings:\n  - It applies existing statutory cost regimes (Part 8 of the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 and Chapter 6 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999) to substituted proceedings but removes the usual maximum cost caps that would otherwise apply to those proceedings (ss 11(1)–(2), 12(1)–(2), 13(1)–(2)).\n  - For statutory benefit claims the Regulation restricts a claimant’s lawyer’s ability to recover costs: recovery is only on a party‑and‑party basis and only if ordered by the District Court (s 11(3)).\n\n  Who pays and how behaviour changes: these provisions affect the distribution of litigation costs between claimants, insurers and legal practitioners. Removing a maximum costs cap (ss 11(2), 12(2), 13(2)) means the numerical ceilings in the referenced Schedules no longer constrain costs in substituted proceedings. Limiting recovery of legal costs to party‑and‑party rates and to situations with a District Court order (s 11(3)) introduces an administrative gate (a court order) before legal practitioners can recover costs in substituted statutory benefit claims.\n\n- Appointment and eligibility rules concentrate selection power in the President (s 5) and introduce objective eligibility criteria for medical assessors and mediators (ss 6–7). The President must give a written instrument specifying term, type of appointment and any restrictions (s 5(1)–(2)), and may decide suitability based on professional qualifications and membership (s 6(c)). Mediators must be accredited under the National Mediator Accreditation System (s 7).\n\n### Implementation, compliance and discretion risks (source‑grounded)\n\n- Bureaucratic discretion: the President has explicit discretion to appoint, set terms, assess suitability and impose restrictions (s 5; s 6(c)). The Regulation relies on the President’s subjective assessment of suitability for medical assessors (s 6(c)).\n\n- Compliance burden for appointees: medical assessors must be registered without disciplinary‑related registration conditions and must be members of recognised colleges or bodies (s 6(a)–(b)). Mediators must be accredited (s 7). These are administrative prerequisites that prospective appointees must satisfy.\n\n- Procedural friction for cost recovery: legal practitioners representing claimants under substituted statutory benefit claims can only recover legal costs if the District Court orders payment and on a party‑and‑party basis (s 11(3)). That requirement may add litigation steps and uncertainty about recoverability.\n\n- Effects on private parties and markets: the Regulation alters cost constraints that apply in substituted proceedings by removing maximum cost caps (ss 11(2), 12(2), 13(2)). In practical terms, this changes the regulatory ceiling on recoverable costs for substituted proceedings; it may affect fee arrangements and the economics of representation in those proceedings because the caps in the referenced Schedules no longer bind substituted proceedings.\n\n### Trade‑offs and opportunity costs (source‑grounded)\n\n- The Regulation centralises appointment control with the President while introducing professional membership and accreditation requirements; the trade‑off is between centralised selection and standardised qualification checks for assessors and mediators (ss 5–7).\n\n- Removing maximum cost caps for substituted proceedings removes a numerical constraint but retaining the requirement that claimant lawyers obtain District Court orders and recover only on a party‑and‑party basis for statutory benefits (s 11(3)) constrains when and how costs can be claimed, shifting some decision‑making to courts and altering the incentives of lawyers, claimants and insurers.\n\n### Short practical summary in one sentence\n\nThe Regulation sets appointment procedures and eligibility rules for Commission decision‑makers, medical assessors and mediators, and modifies how certain motor accident and statutory benefit cost rules apply to substituted proceedings (including removing some maximum cost caps and restricting when claimant legal costs may be recovered), while prescribing a small set of internal staff as relevant Commission officers and repealing Schedule 1 after establishment (ss 1–15)."},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The Regulation appears tightly scoped to its original purpose of operationalising the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020. It covers appointment procedures, qualifications, and Federal Court cost modifications — all directly supporting the establishment and functioning of the Commission without significant mission creep."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple cross-references to at least 6 other Acts and Regulations (Personal Injury Commission Act 2020, Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998, Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, Interpretation Act 1987)","Nested conditional logic in clauses 11-13 regarding costs modifications for substituted proceedings","Requires understanding of 'substituted proceedings' — a technical concept where Commission proceedings transfer to Federal Court","Dual pathways for motor accident claims depending on which Act applies (1999 vs 2017 legislation)","Interaction between this Regulation and the enabling legislation creates interdependent interpretation requirements"],"plain_english_summary":"**What this legislation does:**\n\nThis Regulation sets up the operational details for the **Personal Injury Commission** — a New South Wales body that handles disputes about workplace injuries and motor vehicle accidents. Think of it as the rulebook for how the Commission runs day-to-day.\n\n**Key things it covers:**\n\n*   **Who can make decisions:** It spells out how the President of the Commission appoints three types of decision-makers:\n    *   **Medical assessors** — doctors who evaluate injuries and decide on compensation for permanent impairment (a legal term meaning lasting physical or psychological damage)\n    *   **Merit reviewers** — officials who review decisions if someone disagrees with them\n    *   **Mediators** — neutral third parties who help injured people and insurers reach agreements without going to court\n\n*   **Qualifications required:**\n    *   Medical assessors must be registered health practitioners with no disciplinary conditions on their registration, belong to a medical college, and have skills the President considers appropriate\n    *   Mediators must be accredited under the National Mediator Accreditation System\n\n*   **Federal court matters:** When personal injury cases get moved from the Commission to the Federal Court (called \"substituted proceedings\"), this Regulation modifies how costs and fees work. Normally, there are caps on what lawyers can charge — these caps don't apply in Federal Court proceedings, and lawyers can only get paid if the court orders it.\n\n*   **Timing:** The Regulation starts when the Commission itself is established and includes a temporary Schedule that gets repealed the day after establishment.\n\n**Who it affects:**\n\n*   Injured workers and drivers in NSW making compensation claims\n*   Doctors wanting to work as medical assessors for the Commission\n*   Lawyers handling personal injury claims\n*   Insurance companies\n\n**Why it matters:**\n\nWithout these rules, the Commission couldn't function. The Regulation ensures qualified people are making decisions about serious injuries, and it manages the tricky situation when cases move to Federal Court — preventing a free-for-all on legal fees while ensuring access to justice."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/personal-injury-commission-regulation-2020","history":"/api/acts/personal-injury-commission-regulation-2020/history","analysis":"/api/acts/personal-injury-commission-regulation-2020/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/personal-injury-commission-regulation-2020/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/personal-injury-commission-regulation-2020/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/personal-injury-commission-regulation-2020/documents"}}