{"id":"perry-lakes-redevelopment-regulations-2006","name":"Perry Lakes Redevelopment Regulations 2006","slug":"perry-lakes-redevelopment-regulations-2006","collection":"regulation","jurisdiction":"wa","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":179247,"registerId":"wa-perry-lakes-redevelopment-regulations-2006-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-05","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Perry Lakes Redevelopment Regulations 2006","content":"![Crest]()Western Australia\n\nPerry Lakes Redevelopment Act 2005\n\nPerry Lakes Redevelopment Regulations 2006\n\nWestern Australia\n\nPerry Lakes Redevelopment Regulations 2006\n\nContents\n\n1. Citation 1\n\n2. Extension of the AK redevelopment area 1\n\n3. Form of application (Act s. 32(1)) 1\n\n4. Documents with applications, requirements for 2\n\n5. Fee for application (Act s. 32(1)) 3\n\nSchedule 1 — Depiction of Deposited Plan 52693\n\nSchedule 2 — Forms\n\n1. Application for development approval (r. 3) 5\n\nNotes\n\nCompilation table 7\n\n  \n\nWestern Australia\n\nPerry Lakes Redevelopment Act 2005\n\nPerry Lakes Redevelopment Regulations 2006\n\n##### 1. Citation\n\n\t\tThese regulations are the *Perry Lakes Redevelopment Regulations 2006*.\n\n##### 2. Extension of the AK redevelopment area\n\n(1) The land shaded grey on Deposited Plan 52693 (depicted in Schedule 1) is declared to be part of the AK redevelopment area.\n\n(2) The Deposited Plan referred to in subregulation (1) is that held by the Western Australian Land Information Authority established by the *Land Information Authority Act 2006* section 5.\n\n[Regulation 2 amended: Gazette 29 Dec 2006 p. 5905.]\n\n##### 3. Form of application (Act s. 32(1))\n\n(1) Schedule 2 Form 1 is prescribed for the purposes of section 32(1) of the Act.\n\n(2) An application for a development approval referred to in section 32(1) of the Act must be accompanied by 4 copies of —\n\n(a) a plan, drawn to a scale not smaller than 1:2000, that identifies the land on which the development described in the application is proposed; and\n\n(b) documents that fully and clearly illustrate and detail the proposed development, being —\n\n(i) a plan or plans, drawn to a scale generally not smaller than 1:500; and\n\n(ii) written verbal specifications.\n\n##### 4. Documents with applications, requirements for\n\n(1) A plan required by regulation 3(2) must be drawn on a white background.\n\n(2) The documents required by regulation 3(2) must use metric measurements.\n\n(3) The documents required by regulation 3(2)(b) must include the following —\n\n(a) the location and proposed use of any existing buildings and outbuildings to be retained and the location and use of buildings proposed to be erected or demolished on the land;\n\n(b) the existing and proposed means of access for pedestrians and vehicles to and from the land;\n\n(c) the location, number, dimension and layout of all car parking spaces intended to be provided;\n\n(d) the location and dimensions of any area proposed to be provided for the loading and unloading of vehicles carrying goods or commodities to and from the land and the means of access to and from those areas;\n\n(e) the location, dimensions, design and particulars of the manner in which it is proposed to develop any landscaped area, including the retention of existing trees, vegetation, fences and walls;\n\n(f) plans, elevations and sections of any building proposed to be erected or altered and of any building it is intended to retain, including details of materials of construction, finishes and external colour;\n\n(g) details of any impact of the proposed development on —\n\n(i) the appearance of streets and of vegetation and buildings in streets; and\n\n(ii) the views, privacy and overshadowing of neighbours’ land;\n\n(h) details of the proposed use and operation of the proposed development;\n\n(i) details of any signs or advertising structures that are proposed to be included in the proposed development.\n\n##### 5. Fee for application (Act s. 32(1))\n\nThe fee to be paid with an application for a development approval under the Act is as set out in the Table to this regulation.\n\nTable\n\n| **Item** | **Estimated cost of the development** | **Fee ($)** |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 1. | Not more than $50 000 | $139 |\n| 2. | More than $50 000 but not more than $500 000 | 0.32% of the estimated cost of development |\n| 3. | More than $500 000 but not more than $2.5m | $1 600 + 0.257% for every $1 in excess of $500 000 |\n| 4. | More than $2.5m but not more than $5m | $6 740 + 0.206% for every $1 in excess of $2.5m |\n| 5. | More than $5m but not more than $21.5m | $11 890 + 0.123% for every $1 in excess of $5m |\n| 6. | More than $21.5m | $32 185 |\n\n\n[Regulation 5 amended: Gazette 30 Jun 2011 p. 2632.]\n\nSchedule 1 — Depiction of Deposited Plan 52693\n\n[r. 2]\n\n[Heading inserted: Gazette 7 Aug 2007 p. 4046.]\n\n![DP52693 R90CCW]()\n\n[Schedule 1 inserted: Gazette 7 Aug 2007 p. 4046.]\n\nSchedule 2 — Forms\n\n1. Application for development approval (r. 3)\n\n(Office Use Only) Application No. . . . . .\n\n*Perry Lakes Redevelopment Act 2005* s. 32(1)\n\n**Application for a development approval**\n\n**To: Western Australian Planning Commission**\n\n1. Owner(s) of land proposed to be developed:\n\nSurname (or Company name) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other names . . . . . . . . . . .\n\nAddress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\nSurname (or Company name) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other names . . . . . . . . . . .\n\nAddress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n2. Applicant’s name in full (if owner put ‘Owner’) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n3. Address for correspondence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\nTelephone No(s). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n4. Address of land where development is proposed:\n\n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n5. Nearest road junction/intersection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n6. Name of local government(s) of the district(s) in which the land is situated:\n\n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n7. Formal description of the land:\n\nLot No(s). . . . . Location No. . . . . . . Deposited plan/Diagram No. . . . . .\n\nCertificate of Title Vol. . . . . . Folio . . . . . . . .\n\nLot No(s). . . . . Location No. . . . . . . Deposited plan/Diagram No. . . . . .\n\nCertificate of Title Vol. . . . . . Folio . . . . . . . .\n\n8. Purpose for which the land is currently being used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n9. Description of existing buildings on the land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n10. Are existing buildings to be demolished in whole or in part?\n\n(a) YES/NO (b) WHOLE/PART\n\n11. Description of the proposed development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n12. Materials and colour to be used on external surfaces (including the roof) and any paved areas of the development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n13. Estimated cost of the development $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\n14. Estimated completion date of the development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\n\nSignature(s) of owner(s) of the land. Signature(s) of applicant(s).\n\n. . . . . . . . . . . . . Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date . . . . . . . . .\n\n. . . . . . . . . . . . . Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date . . . . . . . . .\n\nIf signing on behalf of a company state how authorised to sign.\n\nNote: This application must be accompanied by 4 copies of the plan(s) and specifications for the development and the prescribed fee.\n\nNotes\n\n1 This is a compilation of the *Perry Lakes Redevelopment Regulations 2006* and includes the amendments made by the other written laws referred to in the following table.\n\nCompilation table\n\n| **Citation** | **Gazettal** | **Commencement** |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| *Perry Lakes Redevelopment Regulations 2006* | 31 Oct 2006 p. 4603‑6 | 31 Oct 2006 |\n| *Perry Lakes Redevelopment Amendment Regulations 2006* | 29 Dec 2006 p. 5904‑5 | 1 Jan 2007 (see r. 2 and *Gazette* 8 Dec 2006 p. 5369) |\n| *Perry Lakes Redevelopment Amendment Regulations 2007* | 7 Aug 2007 p. 4045-6 | r. 1 and 2: 7 Aug 2007 (see r. 2(a));   Regulations other than r. 1 and 2: 8 Aug 2007 (see r. 2(b)) |\n| *Perry Lakes Redevelopment Amendment Regulations 2011* | 30 Jun 2011 p. 2631-2 | r. 1 and 2: 30 Jun 2011 (see r. 2(a));   Regulations other than r. 1 and 2: 1 Jul 2011 (see r. 2(b)) |\n","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":3,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The regulations implement and operationalise the Perry Lakes Redevelopment Act 2005 by prescribing practical steps: they add a specific parcel to the redevelopment area, set the required application form and documentary standards, and fix application fees. Those actions adjust the geographic coverage (reg. 2) and the administrative mechanics of applying for approvals, but they do not expand the Act’s substantive powers or create new types of regulatory control beyond what the Act contemplates. In short, the instrument narrows or specifies procedure and boundary rather than changing the core statutory purpose."},"complexity_factors":["Short instrument: 5 regulations plus 2 schedules (including a form and a plan depiction)","Cross-reference to Perry Lakes Redevelopment Act 2005 s.32(1) for application process (reg. 3)","Geographic definition by reference to an external deposited plan (Deposited Plan 52693) requiring access to spatial records to determine exact boundary (reg. 2 and Schedule 1)","Detailed documentary requirements with nine listed content items (reg. 4(3)(a)–(i))","Technical requirements for plans (scale not smaller than 1:2000 for location plan, generally not smaller than 1:500 for development plans; white background; metric) (reg. 3(2) and reg. 4(1)–(2))","Administrative requirement for four copies of plans/specifications (reg. 3(2))","Tiered fee table with percentage calculations and fixed caps for different cost bands (reg. 5 Table)","Amendment history and references to other statutes (Land Information Authority Act 2006) which require cross-referencing for legal context"],"plain_english_summary":"**What these regulations do (mechanically)\n\n- Add a specific parcel of land to the \"AK redevelopment area\" by reference to a deposited plan (Deposited Plan 52693). (reg. 2)\n- Prescribe the form that must be used when applying for a development approval under the Perry Lakes Redevelopment Act 2005 (reg. 3 and Schedule 2 Form 1).\n- Set detailed documentary and technical standards for development applications, including how plans must be drawn (scale, white background), use of metric measurements, number of copies, and a checklist of information the plans/specifications must contain (access, parking, loading areas, landscaping, building elevations, impact on neighbours, signs, and operational details). (regs. 3–4)\n- Set the fee structure applicants must pay with a development application, in a tiered table based on the estimated cost of the development (fixed fees for very small or very large developments and percentage-based fees for intermediate bands). (reg. 5 and Table)\n\nWho this affects and who decides\n\n- Affected parties: landowners and applicants proposing development inside the Perry Lakes redevelopment area (including the land newly added by reg. 2). They must use the prescribed application form, supply the specified documents, meet the technical presentation standards, and pay the prescribed fee. (regs. 2–5, Schedule 2)\n- Decision-maker: applications are made to the Western Australian Planning Commission (the form is addressed to that body). The regulations do not change who decides; they standardise the paperwork and fees for that decision process. (Schedule 2)\n\nWhy it matters (claimed purpose and an assessment of effects)\n\n- The regulations implement administrative detail for the redevelopment scheme established by the Perry Lakes Redevelopment Act 2005: they define (a) the geographic boundary of the redevelopment area by adding the land shown on Deposited Plan 52693 (reg. 2), (b) the application form and documentary standards to make submissions consistent and assessable (reg. 3 and Schedule 2), and (c) a predictable fee schedule to fund processing and signal relative scale of applications (reg. 5).\n\nAssessment of costs, incentives and trade-offs\n\n- Compliance burden: Applicants must prepare multiple copies (4 copies) of plans and specifications meeting precise requirements (scale, metric, white background) and supply detailed information on parking, access, landscaping, building elevations, neighbour impact and proposed operations (regs. 3–4). This raises preparatory costs (time, consultant fees for drawings/specifications) and increases the upfront administrative burden on small and large developers alike.\n- Predictability and administrative efficiency: Standardised forms and content requirements reduce ambiguity about what the authority expects and can speed internal processing if applicants comply. The white-background, scale and metric rules (reg. 4(1)–(2)) are low-friction technical standards that promote uniformity of submitted plans.\n- Fees and private cost: The tiered fee table (reg. 5) increases the direct cost of seeking development approval. For small projects the fee is modest; for larger projects the fee is percentage-based (or capped above a threshold). Fee design creates proportionate cost pressure on more expensive developments and transfers processing costs to applicants rather than the approving authority.\n- Geographic scope: Declaring additional land part of the redevelopment area (reg. 2) brings that land and its owners into the statutory approval regime. That changes who must apply for approvals under the Act and therefore who bears the compliance and fee costs; it also makes those owners subject to any redevelopment controls the Act authorises.\n- Effects on private choice and market activity: By making approvals conditional on prescribed documentation, the regulations shape how developers plan and present projects (encouraging more detailed pre-application design and documentation). Fees could affect project viability at the margins, particularly for developments with small margins or when multiple approvals are required.\n\nImplementation risk and discretion\n\n- These regulations are largely technical and prescriptive; they leave substantive decision-making to the planning authority but reduce discretion around what must be submitted. Implementation risk is mostly administrative (ensuring the deposited plan is available, enforcing submission standards, and applying the fee table accurately). The regulations do not create new discretionary approval powers.\n\nConcentrated benefits and costs\n\n- The extension of the redevelopment area (reg. 2) concentrates the regulatory regime’s direct effects on owners and prospective developers of the newly-included land. The documentary and fee requirements impose diffuse compliance costs on all applicants within the redevelopment area.\n\nRelevant provisions: reg. 2 (extension of area), reg. 3 and Schedule 2 (form and copies), reg. 4 (document requirements and technical standards), reg. 5 and Table (fees)."},"summary":{"complexity_score":1,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"Unable to assess whether the scope changed from original intent, as no legislative text was available for analysis."},"complexity_factors":["No legislative content was retrievable — only a webpage error message was provided","Cannot assess complexity without access to the actual regulatory text","Score of 1 reflects absence of analysable content, not simplicity of the underlying law"],"plain_english_summary":"**No legislation content could be retrieved.**\n\nThe page for the Perry Lakes Redevelopment Regulations 2006 (a Western Australian law) is no longer available at its original web address. The content of the actual regulations was not accessible — only an error message and a site notice were returned.\n\n**What we do know:**\n- This is a Western Australian regulation (subordinate legislation made under a parent Act) relating to the redevelopment of Perry Lakes, a former athletics and sporting precinct in the Perth suburb of Floreat.\n- Regulations of this type typically govern planning, land use, development approvals, and administrative processes for a specific redevelopment project.\n- Without the actual text, no meaningful analysis of its provisions, affected parties, or practical impact can be provided.\n\n**What you should do:** Visit the Western Australian legislation website (legislation.wa.gov.au) and search directly for \"Perry Lakes Redevelopment Regulations 2006\" to access the current text."},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":2,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The regulations remain tightly focused on their original purpose: operationalising the Perry Lakes redevelopment scheme. They cover boundary delineation, application procedures, documentation standards, and fee structures—exactly what one would expect for subsidiary regulations under a redevelopment Act. No scope creep is evident."},"complexity_factors":["Very short instrument—only 5 substantive regulations plus schedules","Minimal defined terms (relies on definitions in the parent Act)","No nested conditional logic or exceptions to exceptions","Straightforward prescriptive requirements (form content, fee table, plan specifications)","Single cross-reference to Deposited Plan 52693 for the boundary extension","Fee calculation uses simple tiered percentages without complex formulas"],"plain_english_summary":"**What this does:**\nThese regulations set the practical rules for developing land in the Perry Lakes area of Western Australia—a specific urban renewal project. They work alongside the *Perry Lakes Redevelopment Act 2005* to control what paperwork developers must submit, how much they must pay, and exactly which parcels of land are covered.\n\n**Who it affects:**\n- **Property developers** wanting to build in the Perry Lakes redevelopment zone (specifically the \"AK redevelopment area\" plus an extended portion shown on Deposited Plan 52693).\n- **Landowners** in that zone who need approval before starting any development.\n- The **Western Australian Planning Commission**, which processes these applications.\n\n**Key things it covers:**\n\n- **Map of the zone:** It adds extra land to the redevelopment area using a specific survey plan (Deposited Plan 52693) held by the state's land authority.\n\n- **Application paperwork:** Developers must use a specific form (Schedule 2, Form 1) and submit 4 copies of detailed plans drawn to scale (1:2000 for location maps, 1:500 for detailed designs). Plans must be on white backgrounds and use metric measurements.\n\n- **What details must be shown:** The application must spell out everything from car parking and landscaping to building materials, colours, and even how the development might affect neighbours' views and privacy.\n\n- **Fees:** A sliding scale based on project cost—from $139 for small projects under $50,000, up to a maximum of $32,185 for projects over $21.5 million.\n\n**Why it matters:**\nThis is a tightly controlled \"spot rezoning\" regime. Instead of using normal council planning rules, Perry Lakes operates under special state legislation. These regulations are the operational manual—without following them exactly, developers cannot get approval to build. It ensures the government's vision for this high-profile site (formerly the Perry Lakes athletics stadium) is implemented consistently."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/perry-lakes-redevelopment-regulations-2006","history":"/api/acts/perry-lakes-redevelopment-regulations-2006/history","analysis":"/api/acts/perry-lakes-redevelopment-regulations-2006/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/perry-lakes-redevelopment-regulations-2006/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/perry-lakes-redevelopment-regulations-2006/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/perry-lakes-redevelopment-regulations-2006/documents"}}