{"id":"F1996B01852","name":"Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Grand Duchy of Luxembourg) Regulations","slug":"mutual-assistance-in-criminal-matters-grand-duchy-of-luxembourg-regulations","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"99 of 1994","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":29150,"registerId":"commonwealth-F1996B01852-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-01","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Grand Duchy of Luxembourg) Regulations","content":"Statutory Rules 1994 No. 991\n\n\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\n\nMutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Grand Duchy of Luxembourg) Regulations\n\nI, THE ADMINISTRATOR of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, make the following Regulations under the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987.\n\nDated 13 April 1994.\n\nP. BENNETT\n\nAdministrator\n\nBy His Excellency’s Command,\n\nM. LAVARCH\n\nAttorney-General\n\n\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\n\nCitation\n\n1. These Regulations may be cited as the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Grand Duchy of Luxembourg) Regulations.\n\nCommencement\n\n2. These Regulations commence on 15 May 1994.\n\nInterpretation\n\n3. In these Regulations, unless the contrary intention appears:\n\n“the Act” means the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987.\n\nApplication of Act\n\n4. The Act applies to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg subject to such limitations, conditions, exceptions or qualifications as are necessary to give effect to the Treaty between Australia and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters done at Luxembourg on 24 October 1988 (being the treaty a copy of the English text of which is set out in the Schedule).\n\n\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\n\nSCHEDULE Regulation 4\n\nTREATY BETWEEN AUSTRALIA AND THE GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG ON MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS\n\nAustralia and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg\n\nDESIRING to extend to each other the widest measure of cooperation to combat crime,\n\nHAVE AGREED as follows:\n\nARTICLE 1\n\nSCOPE OF APPLICATION\n\n1. The Contracting States shall, in accordance with this Treaty, grant to each other assistance in investigations or proceedings in respect of criminal matters.\n\n2. Such assistance shall consist of:\n\n(a) taking of evidence and obtaining of statements of persons;\n\n(b) provision of documents and other records;\n\n(c) location and identification of persons;\n\n(d) execution of requests for search and seizure, as well as for identifying, restraining, confiscating and returning of the proceeds of crime;\n\n(e) making prisoners available to give evidence or to assist investigations;\n\n(f) making other persons available to give evidence or to assist investigations;\n\n(g) service of documents; and\n\n(h) other assistance consistent with the objects of this Treaty which is not inconsistent with the law of the Requested State.\n\n3. Assistance shall not include:\n\n(a) the arrest or detention of any person with a view to extradition;\n\n(b) execution of final criminal determinations except to the extent permitted by the law of the Requested State and this Treaty; and\n\n(c) the transfer of prisoners to serve sentences.\n\nARTICLE 2\n\nOTHER ASSISTANCE\n\nThis Treaty shall not derogate from obligations subsisting between the Contracting States pursuant to other treaties or arrangements nor prevent the Contracting States providing assistance to each other pursuant to other treaties or arrangements.\n\nARTICLE 3\n\nCENTRAL OFFICE\n\n1. The Contracting States shall each appoint a Central Office to transmit and receive requests for the purpose of this Treaty. Until the relevant Contracting State designates another authority, the Central Office of Australia shall be the Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra and the Central Office of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg shall be the Ministry of Justice, Luxembourg.\n\n2. Requests for assistance shall be made through the Central Offices which shall arrange for the prompt carrying out of such requests.\n\nARTICLE 4\n\nREFUSAL OF ASSISTANCE\n\n1. Assistance shall be refused if:\n\n(a) the request relates to an offence that is regarded by the Requested State as:\n\n(i) an offence of a political character; or\n\n(ii) an offence under military law of the Requested State which is not also an offence under the ordinary criminal law of the Requested State;\n\n(b) the request relates to an offence in respect of which the offender has been finally acquitted or pardoned or has served the sentence imposed;\n\n(c) there are substantial grounds for believing that the request for assistance has been made to facilitate the prosecution of a person on account of that person’s race, sex, religion, nationality or political opinions or that that person’s position may be prejudiced for any of these reasons; or\n\n(d) the Requested State is of the opinion that the request, if granted, would seriously impair its sovereignty, security, national interest or other essential interests.\n\n2. Assistance may be refused if:\n\n(a) the request, according to the law of the Requested State, relates to a fiscal offence;\n\n(b) the request relates to an offence where the acts or omissions alleged to constitute that offence would not, if they had taken place within the jurisdiction of the Requested State, have constituted an offence;\n\n(c) the request relates to an offence which is committed outside the territory of the Requesting State and the law of the Requested State does not provide for the punishment of a similar offence committed outside its territory in similar circumstances;\n\n(d) the request for assistance relates to an offence which, had it been committed in the Requested State, could no longer be prosecuted by reason of lapse of time or any other reason; or\n\n(e) the provision of the assistance sought could prejudice an investigation or proceeding in the Requested State, prejudice the safety of any person or impose an excessive burden on the resources of that State.\n\n3. Before refusing to grant a request for assistance the Requested State may consider whether assistance could be granted subject to such conditions as it deems necessary. If the Requesting State accepts assistance subject to conditions, it shall comply with the conditions.\n\nARTICLE 5\n\nCONTENTS OF REQUESTS\n\n1. Requests for assistance shall include:\n\n(a) the name of the competent authority conducting the investigation or proceedings to which the request relates;\n\n(b) except in cases of requests for service of documents, a description of the essential acts, omissions or matters alleged or sought to be ascertained and a description of the nature of the criminal matter including the text of the relevant provision of the law creating an offence (or in the case of Australia, in respect of a common law offence, by a statement of the law applicable to the offence);\n\n(c) the purpose for which the request is made and the nature of the assistance sought;\n\n(d) details of any particular procedure or requirement that the Requesting State wishes to be followed;\n\n(e) the requirements, if any, of confidentiality and the reasons therefore; and\n\n(f) specification of any time limit within which compliance with the request is desired.\n\n2. Requests for assistance, to the extent necessary and insofar as possible, shall also include:\n\n(a) the identity, nationality and location of the person or persons who are the subject of, or who may have material evidence relating to, the investigation or proceeding;\n\n(b) a statement as to whether sworn or affirmed evidence or statements are required;\n\n(c) a description of the information, statements, documents, records or other material to be produced as well as a description of the appropriate person to be asked to produce them and, to the extent not otherwise provided for, the form in which they should be reproduced and authenticated; and\n\n(d) information as to the allowances and expenses to which a person appearing in the Requesting State will be entitled.\n\n3. All documents submitted in support of a request, where necessary, shall be accompanied by a translation:\n\n(a) in the case of a request to Australia, in English; or\n\n(b) in the case of a request to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, in French.\n\n4. If the Requested State considers that the information contained in the request is not sufficient to enable the request to be dealt with, that State may request that additional information be furnished.\n\nARTICLE 6\n\nEXECUTION OF REQUESTS\n\n1. To the extent permitted by its law, the Requested State shall provide such assistance as specified in the request and shall respond to the request as soon as practicable.\n\n2. The Requested State may postpone the delivery of material requested if such material is required for proceedings in respect of criminal or civil matters in that State. The Requested State shall, upon request, provide certified copies of documents.\n\n3. The Requested State shall promptly inform the Requesting State of circumstances, when they become known to the Requested State, which are likely to cause a significant delay in responding to the request.\n\n4. The Requested State shall promptly inform the Requesting State of a decision of the Requested State not to comply in whole or in part with a request for assistance and the reason for that decision.\n\nARTICLE 7\n\nRETURN OF MATERIAL TO REQUESTED STATE\n\nWhere required by the Requested State, the Requesting State shall return the material provided after the completion of the proceedings to which the request relates.\n\nARTICLE 8\n\nPROTECTING CONFIDENTIALITY AND RESTRICTING USE OF\n\nEVIDENCE AND INFORMATION\n\n1. The Requested State, if so requested, shall keep the application for assistance, the contents of a request and its supporting documents, and the fact of granting of such assistance, confidential. If the request cannot be executed without breaching confidentiality, the Requested State shall so inform the Requesting State which shall then determine whether the request should nevertheless be executed.\n\n2. The Requesting State, if so requested, shall keep confidential evidence and information provided by the Requested State, except to the extent that the evidence and information is needed for the investigation and proceeding described in the request.\n\n3. The Requesting State shall not use evidence obtained, nor information derived therefrom, for purposes other than those stated in a request without the prior consent of the Requested State.\n\nARTICLE 9\n\nSERVICE OF DOCUMENTS\n\n1. A request to effect service of a document requiring the appearance of a person shall be made to the Requested State not less than 45 days before the date on which the appearance is required. In urgent cases, the Requested State may waive this requirement.\n\n2. The Requested State shall effect service of documents which are transmitted to it for this purpose by the Requesting State.\n\n3. Service may be effected by simple transmission of the document to the person to be served. If the Requesting State expressly so requests, service shall be effected by the Requested State in the manner provided for the service of analogous documents under its own law or in a special manner consistent with such law.\n\n4. Proof of service shall be given by means of a receipt dated and signed by the person served or by means of a declaration made by the Requested State that service has been effected and stating the form and date of such service. One or other of these documents shall be sent immediately to the Requesting State. The Requested State shall, if the Requesting State so requests, state whether service has been effected in accordance with the law of the Requested State. If service cannot be effected, the reasons shall be communicated immediately by the Requested State to the Requesting State.\n\nARTICLE 10\n\nTAKING OF EVIDENCE\n\n1. Where a request is made for the purpose of a proceeding in relation to a criminal matter in the Requesting State the Requested State shall take evidence of witnesses for transmission to the Requesting State.\n\n2. For the purposes of this Treaty, the giving or taking of evidence shall include the production of documents, records or other material.\n\n3. For the purposes of requests under this Article the Requesting State shall specify the nature of the questions to be put to the witnesses or the subject matter about which they are to be examined.\n\n4. Where a person is required to give evidence pursuant to this Article, officials and persons involved in the proceedings in the Requesting State may be present if the Requested State consents.\n\n5. A person who is required to give evidence in the Requested State under this Article may decline to give evidence where either:\n\n(a) the law of the Requested State permits that witness to decline to give evidence in similar circumstances in proceedings originating in the Requested State; or\n\n(b) where the law of the Requesting State permits that witness to decline to give evidence in such proceedings in the Requesting State.\n\n6. If any person claims a right to decline to give evidence under the law of the Requesting State, the Requested State shall, with respect thereto, rely on a certificate of the Central Office of the Requesting State.\n\nARTICLE 11\n\nTEMPORARY TRANSFER OF PRISONERS TO GIVE EVIDENCE\n\nOR ASSIST INVESTIGATIONS\n\n1. A prisoner in the Requested State may at the request of the Requesting State be temporarily transferred to the Requesting State to give evidence or to assist investigations.\n\n2. The Requested State shall not transfer a prisoner to the Requesting State unless the prisoner consents.\n\n3. While the original sentence of a prisoner in the Requested State has not expired, the Requesting State shall hold the prisoner in custody and shall return that prisoner in custody to the Requested State at the conclusion of the proceedings in relation to which transfer to the Requesting State is sought under paragraph 1 of this Article or at such earlier time as that prisoner’s presence is no longer required.\n\n4. Where the sentence imposed on a person transferred under this Article expires whilst the person is in the Requesting State, that person shall thereafter be treated as a person referred to in Article 12.\n\nARTICLE 12\n\nAVAILABILITY OF OTHER PERSONS TO GIVE EVIDENCE OR\n\nASSIST INVESTIGATIONS\n\n1. The Requesting State may request the assistance of the Requested State in making a person available:\n\n(a) to appear as a witness in proceedings in relation to a criminal matter in the Requesting State unless that person is the person charged; or\n\n(b) to assist investigations in relation to a criminal matter in the Requesting State.\n\n2. The Requested State shall, if satisfied that satisfactory arrangements for that person’s security will be made by the Requesting State, request the person to consent to appear as a witness in proceedings or to assist in the investigations.\n\nARTICLE 13\n\nSAFE CONDUCT\n\n1. Where a person consents to give evidence in a proceeding or to assist in an investigation in the Requesting State under Articles 11 or 12:\n\n(a) that person shall not be detained, prosecuted or punished in the Requesting State for any offence, nor shall advantage be taken in the Requesting State of the presence of the person for the purpose of civil proceedings, in respect of any act or omission which preceded the person’s departure from the Requested State; or\n\n(b) that person shall not be required to give evidence in any proceeding other than the proceeding to which the request relates, without that person’s consent.\n\n2. Paragraph 1 of this Article shall cease to apply if that person, not being a prisoner detained under Article 11, and being free to leave, has not left the Requesting State within a period of thirty days after that person has been officially notified that that person’s presence is no longer required or, having left, has returned.\n\n3. A person appearing before an authority in a Requesting State pursuant to a request under Articles 11 or 12 shall not be subject to prosecution based on the testimony given except that that person shall be subject to the laws of that State in relation to contempt and perjury.\n\n4. A person who does not consent to a request pursuant to Articles 11 or 12 shall not by reason thereof, be liable to any penalty or be subjected to any coercive measure notwithstanding any contrary statement in the request.\n\n5. A person who appears as a witness in the Requesting State pursuant to a request may decline to give evidence if the person has, under the law of the Requested State, a right to decline to do so.\n\n6. If any person claims a right to decline to give evidence under the law of the Requested State, the Requesting State shall, with respect to that claim, rely on a certificate of the Central Office of the Requested State.\n\nARTICLE 14\n\nPROVISION OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE AND OFFICIAL\n\nDOCUMENTS\n\n1. Upon request, the Requested State shall provide copies of documents and records that are open to public access as part of a public register or otherwise.\n\n2. Upon request, the Requested State may provide copies of any official document or record in the same manner and under the same conditions as such document or record may be provided to its own law enforcement and judicial authorities.\n\nARTICLE 15\n\nCERTIFICATION AND AUTHENTICATION\n\n1. Each Contracting State shall, upon request, authenticate any documents or other material to be transmitted to the other Contracting State under this Treaty.\n\n2. A document is authenticated for the purposes of this Treaty if:\n\n(a) it purports to be signed or certified by a Judge, Magistrate or other officer in or of the State sending the document; and\n\n(b) it purports to be authenticated by the oath or affirmation of a witness or to be sealed with an official seal of the State sending the document or of a Minister of State, or of a Department or officer of the Government, of that State.\n\nARTICLE 16\n\nSEARCH AND SEIZURE\n\n1. The Requested State shall, insofar as its law permits, carry out requests for search, seizure and delivery of any material to the Requesting State provided that the request:\n\n(a) relates to acts or omissions which would constitute an extraditable offence under the law of the Requested State; and\n\n(b) contains information that would justify such action under the law of the Requested State.\n\n2. The Requested State shall provide information to the Requesting State concerning the result of any search, the place of seizure, the circumstances of seizure, and the subsequent custody of the property seized.\n\n3. The Requesting State shall observe any conditions imposed by the Requested State in relation to any seized property which is delivered to the Requesting State.\n\nARTICLE 17\n\nPROCEEDS OF CRIME\n\n1. The Requested State shall, upon request, insofar as its law permits and subject to the provisos set out in paragraph l(a) and (b) of Article 16, endeavour to ascertain whether any proceeds of an alleged crime are located within its jurisdiction and shall notify the Requesting State of the results of its enquiries.\n\n2. Where pursuant to paragraph 1 suspected proceeds of crime are found the Requested State shall take such measures as are permitted by its law to prevent any dealing in, transfer or disposal of, those suspected proceeds of crime, pending a final determination in respect of those proceeds by a Court of the Requesting State. The Requested State shall give effect to a confiscation order, in respect of an offence made by a Court of the Requesting State.\n\n3. The Requested State shall return the property obtained in satisfaction of the confiscation order to the Requesting State.\n\nARTICLE 18\n\nCONSULTATION\n\nThe Contracting States shall consult promptly, at the request of either, concerning the interpretation, the application or the carrying out of this Treaty either generally or in relation to a particular case.\n\nARTICLE 19\n\nREPRESENTATION AND EXPENSES\n\n1. Unless otherwise provided in this Treaty the Requested State shall make all necessary arrangements for the representation of the Requesting State in any proceedings arising out of a request for assistance and shall otherwise represent the interest of the Requesting State.\n\n2. The Requested State shall meet the cost of fulfilling the request for assistance except that the Requesting State shall bear:\n\n(a) the expenses associated with conveying any person to or from the territory of the Requested State, and any fees, allowances or expenses payable to that person whilst in the Requesting State pursuant to a request under Articles 11 or 12;\n\n(b) the expenses associated with conveying custodial or escorting officers; and\n\n(c) where required by the Requested State, exceptional expenses in fulfilling the request.\n\nARTICLE 20\n\nENTRY INTO FORCE AND TERMINATION\n\n1. This Treaty shall enter into force thirty days after the date on which the Contracting States have notified each other in writing that their respective requirements for the entry into force of this Treaty have been complied with.\n\n2. This Treaty shall apply to requests whether or not the relevant acts or omissions occurred prior to this Treaty entering into force.\n\n3. Either Contracting State may terminate this Treaty by notice in writing at any time and it shall cease to be in force on the one hundred and eightieth day after the day on which notice is given.\n\n  \nIN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned. being duly authorised thereto by their respective Governments, have signed this Treaty.\n\nDONE at Luxembourg on the 24th day of October One Thousand nine hundred and eighty eight in English and French, both texts being equally authentic.\n\nFor Australia, For the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg,\n\nLionel Bowen Robert Krieps\n\n\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\n\nNOTE\n\n1. Notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 19 April 1994.","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The legislation remains tightly scoped to its original purpose. The Regulations simply give domestic legal effect to the 1988 Treaty between Australia and Luxembourg on mutual assistance in criminal matters. There is no expansion beyond the treaty's original intent—assistance is limited to criminal investigations and proceedings, with explicit exclusions for extradition, execution of foreign criminal judgments, and prisoner transfers to serve sentences. The scope is actually narrower than the enabling Act (Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987) because it applies only to Luxembourg and only subject to the specific limitations in the treaty."},"complexity_factors":["Single operative regulation (Regulation 4) that incorporates an entire international treaty by reference, requiring readers to cross-reference between the Regulations and the Schedule","20 treaty articles with nested conditions, exceptions, and discretionary powers (e.g., 'shall' vs 'may' refusal grounds in Articles 4(1) and 4(2))","Multiple cross-references between articles (e.g., Articles 11 and 12 referenced in Article 13, Article 16 conditions applying to Article 17)","Conditional logic requiring assessment of dual criminality (whether conduct is illegal in both countries) in several articles","Specific procedural requirements with time limits (e.g., 45-day notice for service of documents in Article 9(1), 30-day safe conduct period in Article 13(2))","Bilingual treaty text (English and French equally authentic) creating potential interpretive complexity","Defined term 'the Act' in Regulation 3 requires knowledge of the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987 to fully understand the framework"],"plain_english_summary":"This legislation creates a set of rules that allow Australia and Luxembourg to help each other investigate and prosecute crimes. It essentially puts into Australian law a treaty signed in 1988 that sets up a formal system for cooperation between the two countries' police and courts.\n\n**What it does:**\n- **Enables evidence sharing**: Australian and Luxembourg authorities can request witness statements, documents, and records from each other to use in criminal cases.\n- **Allows temporary prisoner transfers**: Prisoners can be temporarily moved between countries to give evidence or help investigations (but only if they consent).\n- **Covers search and seizure**: Police in one country can ask the other to conduct searches, seize evidence, and track down proceeds of crime (like money from illegal activities).\n- **Protects witnesses**: People who travel to give evidence are protected from being prosecuted for past offences while they're in the other country.\n\n**Who it affects:**\n- Law enforcement agencies (police, prosecutors) in both countries\n- Prisoners who might be asked to testify in the other country\n- Witnesses and victims involved in cross-border criminal cases\n- Courts handling international criminal matters\n\n**Key limitations:**\n- Neither country has to help if the case involves political offences or military crimes\n- Assistance can be refused if it would harm national security or if there are concerns about discrimination (race, religion, etc.)\n- Neither country will arrest people for extradition or transfer prisoners to serve sentences under this system\n\n**Why it matters:**\nCrime doesn't stop at borders. This treaty makes it easier to catch criminals who operate across multiple countries by ensuring Australian and Luxembourg authorities can share information and evidence efficiently. It provides legal certainty about what help can be provided and what protections exist for people involved."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"This instrument does not expand the original purpose of the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987. It extends the Act’s operation to cooperation with the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg by incorporating a bilateral treaty (Schedule) that sets out the scope, procedures and limits of assistance. In substance it applies and confines existing mutual‑assistance machinery to a particular partner state (with negotiated exceptions and procedural rules) rather than changing the overall legislative purpose or creating new categories of domestic regulation."},"complexity_factors":["Instrument is short but incorporates a multi‑article bilateral treaty in the Schedule (20 Articles)","Multiple defined procedural requirements (detailed contents of requests under Treaty Article 5)","Numerous conditional permissions and refusals (Treaty Article 4 contains mandatory and permissive refusal grounds)","Cross‑dependence on domestic law of the Requested State for core powers (search/seizure, confiscation – Articles 16–17)","Administrative requirements: translation obligations, certifications/authentication (Articles 5.3, 15)","Several time and procedural constraints (service 45‑day norm Article 9.1; postponement and notification requirements Articles 6.2–3)"],"plain_english_summary":"This instrument applies Australia’s Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987 to cooperation with Luxembourg by implementing a bilateral treaty that defines available assistance (evidence, documents, searches, restraint/confiscation, transfers) and sets administrative and procedural rules. It affects law enforcement, prosecutors, courts, witnesses, prisoners and businesses holding records—setting obligations, confidentiality limits, cost rules and refusal grounds—facilitating cross‑border criminal assistance while preserving the Requested State’s discretion."},"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/mutual-assistance-in-criminal-matters-grand-duchy-of-luxembourg-regulations","history":"/api/acts/mutual-assistance-in-criminal-matters-grand-duchy-of-luxembourg-regulations/history","analysis":"/api/acts/mutual-assistance-in-criminal-matters-grand-duchy-of-luxembourg-regulations/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/mutual-assistance-in-criminal-matters-grand-duchy-of-luxembourg-regulations/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/mutual-assistance-in-criminal-matters-grand-duchy-of-luxembourg-regulations/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/mutual-assistance-in-criminal-matters-grand-duchy-of-luxembourg-regulations/documents"}}