{"id":"F2005L01890","name":"Humpback Whale Recovery Plan 2005-2010","slug":"humpback-whale-recovery-plan-2005-2010","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"repealed","isInForce":false,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":36082,"registerId":"commonwealth-F2005L01890-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-01","status":"Repealed","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"Objectives","sectionType":"part","heading":"Objectives","content":"## Objectives\n\nThe objectives are:\n\n-   the recovery of populations of humpback whales utilising Australian waters so that the species can be considered secure in the wild;\n-   a distribution of humpback whales utilising Australian waters that is similar to the pre‑exploitation distribution of the species; and\n-   to maintain the protection of humpback whales from human threats.\n\nFor the purposes of this plan ‘secure in the wild’ is defined qualitatively, recognising that stricter definitions are not yet available, but will be refined and where possible quantified during the life of this plan by work currently underway and identified in the actions of this plan.\n\n‘Secure in the wild’ with respect to humpback whales in Australian waters means: a population with sufficient geographic range and distribution, abundance, and genetic diversity to provide a stable population over long time scales.","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"Criteria to measure performance of the p","sectionType":"part","heading":"Criteria to measure performance of the plan against the objectives","content":"## Criteria to measure performance of the plan against the objectives\n\nIt is not anticipated that these objectives will be achieved within the life of the plan for both migratory populations of Australian humpback whales. However, the following criteria can be used to measure the ongoing performance of this plan against the objectives:\n\n1.  secure populations of humpback whales in Australian waters were recorded, or populations continued to recover at, or close to, the optimum biological rate (understood to be approximately 8-10% per annum at the commencement of this plan);\n2.  populations of humpback whales in Australian waters were known to have a distribution similar to the pre‑exploitation distribution, or the range of humpback whale populations continued to expand towards pre-exploitation distributions; and\n3.  domestic and international protection regimes that support the recovery of the species were maintained and where possible improved.","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"Species information","sectionType":"part","heading":"Species information","content":"## Species information\n\nThe humpback whale is a moderately large baleen whale (order Cetacea, family Balaenopteridae). The species is found virtually worldwide, but with apparent geographical segregation. Each year Australian humpback whales migrate from Southern Ocean summer feeding grounds to sub-tropical winter calving grounds. The northern and southern hemisphere populations appear to be distinct given temporal migration separation.\n\nIn the 19th and 20th centuries, humpback whales were hunted extensively throughout the world’s oceans and as a result it is estimated that 95% of the population was eliminated. In Australia, it is estimated that humpback whales were reduced to 3.5 - 5% of pre-whaling abundance. The International Whaling Commission (IWC) imposed a ban on humpback whaling in the southern hemisphere in 1963 and an international moratorium on commercial whaling came into effect in 1985-86.\n\nIn Australia, humpback whales are distributed throughout the Australian Antarctic, Commonwealth offshore, State and Territory waters. Australia has two migratory populations of humpback whales, a west coast and an east coast population (known as Group D and Group E respectively in international fora). Population levels prior to exploitation are difficult to estimate but it has been suggested that the west coast population was between 16,000-30,000 and the east coast population was approximately 27,000. In 1999, the west coast population was estimated to be between 8,000 and 14,000 individuals with a rate of increase of approximately 10.14% from 1982 to 1994. In 1999, the east coast population was estimated to be 3,160-4,040 individuals with a rate of increase of approximately 10.9% from 1978 to 1999. It is likely that these rates of increase will fall as the populations near maximum abundance.\n\nHumpback whales utilising Australian waters currently have tropical calving grounds along the mid and northern parts of the east and west coasts of Australia, and feeding grounds in the Southern Ocean. The majority of humpbacks in Australian waters migrate north to tropical calving grounds from June to August, and south to the Southern Ocean feeding areas from September to November. The exact timing of the migration period can change from year to year and may be influenced by water-temperature, the extent of sea-ice, predation risk, prey abundance and location of feeding ground.\n\nFeeding is likely to be related to krill density and primarily occurs in Southern Ocean waters south of 55°S. However, several opportunistic feeding areas have also been found off the coast of Australia. The available information suggests that a portion of the east coast population disperses into the South Pacific including New Caledonia, Tonga and probably other western South Pacific Islands. Although there are known links between these areas, the levels of exchange are poorly understood and the rates of recovery are likely to be lower for those found near the island groups than close to the east Australian coast.\n\nFurther information on the biology, population status, distribution and habitat of humpback whales can be found on the Species Profiles and Threats Database – [www.deh.gov.au/sprat](http://www.deh.gov.au/sprat). This information is regularly updated to ensure that it reflects the most recent research.","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"Habitat critical to the survival of hump","sectionType":"part","heading":"Habitat critical to the survival of humpback whales","content":"## Habitat critical to the survival of humpback whales\n\nIt is not currently possible to define habitat critical to the survival of humpback whales. The flexibility and adaptability of the species’ habitat requirements are not known, and it is not clear if all the currently used areas are critical to survival or whether the loss of one of these areas could be sustained. The plan therefore focuses on habitat important to the survival of humpback whales.\n\nFor the purpose of this plan, habitat important (and potentially critical) to the survival of humpback whales is defined as those areas known to seasonally support significant aggregations of whales, and those ecosystem processes on which humpback whales rely - in particular known calving, resting and feeding areas, and certain sections of the migratory pathways.\n\nFigure 1 illustrates the distribution, indicative migratory pathways and recognised aggregation areas for humpback whales utilising Australian waters. It should be noted that the boundaries presented on the map are indicative only and there is inherent variability in the movements of the species.\n\nCalving\n\nCurrently known calving areas (based on observations of mothers with very young calves) for Australian humpback whales include:\n\n-   Western Australia - Southern Kimberley between Broome and the northern end of Camden Sound;\n-   Queensland - Great Barrier Reef complex between approximately 14°S and 27°S; and\n-   less frequently along the migratory pathways.\n\nMigration\n\nAlong parts of the migratory route there are narrow corridors and bottlenecks resulting from physical and other barriers where the majority of the population passes close to shore (i.e. within 30 km of the coastline). These habitat areas are important during the time of migration and include:\n\n-   Western Australia - Geraldton/Abrolhos Islands, and Point Cloats to North West Cape; and\n-   Queensland - east of Stradbroke Island, and east of Moreton Island.\n\nResting\n\nResting areas are used by cow-calf pairs and attendant males during the southern migration. These whales appear to use sheltered bays to opportunistically rest during migration to the feeding grounds and include:\n\n-   Western Australia - Exmouth Gulf, Shark Bay, and Geographe Bay;\n-   Queensland – the Whitsundays, Hervey Bay, Moreton Bay, the Swain Reefs complex Great Barrier Reef, Bell Cay, and the Palm Island Group; and\n-   New South Wales - Twofold Bay and Cape Byron.\n\nFeeding\n\nFeeding occurs primarily on Antarctic krill which congregates around the Antarctic continental shelf break and productive, transitional ice-edge zone. Oceanographic features that concentrate krill are likely to attract predators such as humpback whales. Humpback whales from the Australian west and east coast populations are known to mix to some extent at these feeding grounds.","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"Management practices","sectionType":"part","heading":"Management practices","content":"## Management practices\n\n### Domestic measures\n\nIn Australia, humpback whales are listed as vulnerable under the EPBC Act. The EPBC Act established the Australian Whale Sanctuary and gives high levels of protection to cetaceans in Commonwealth waters. The Australian Whale Sanctuary encompasses the area of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) outside state waters and generally extends 200 nm from the coast, but further in some areas to cover the continental shelf and slope. It also includes the waters around the Australian Antarctic Territory and external territories including Christmas, Macquarie, Heard and McDonald Islands.\n\nWithin the Australian Whale Sanctuary it is an offence to kill, injure, take, trade, keep, move or interfere with a cetacean. The EPBC Act also makes it an offence for Australians to carry out any of these actions beyond the outer limits of the Australian Whale Sanctuary, that is, in international or foreign waters. Other than in the case of killing or taking for live display, permits may be issued by the Australian Government Minister for the Environment and Heritage to carry out these activities (e.g. for the purpose of research).\n\nHumpback whales are protected in all States and Territories under general native species and/or threatened species protection and management legislation.\n\nA number of measures currently exist to manage interactions with all species of whales. These include administrative guidelines under the EPBC Act relating to interactions between offshore seismic operations and whales, and both Commonwealth and State regulations to manage whale watching activities.\n\nWithin the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park activities that will interfere with cetaceans are regulated through the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan 2003.\n\n### International measures\n\nThe humpback whale is afforded a degree of international protection through listing on Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), on Appendix II of the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS), and as vulnerable under the World Conservation Union’s Red List (IUCN).\n\nIn addition, Australia participates in several other international agreements that directly or indirectly relate to the conservation of marine mammals. Specifically, Australia was a founding member of the International Whaling Commission (IWC), is the host country of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), and a key player in Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM).\n\nWhales are protected from commercial whaling by IWC member states as part of the current moratorium and by the IWC’s Indian Ocean Sanctuary and Southern Ocean Sanctuary. Sanctuaries do not protect whales from whaling under special permit and are reviewed every ten years.\n\nAustralia is also working within the South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) to establish a Memorandum of Understanding for the conservation and management of marine mammals in the South Pacific region, under the Convention on Migratory Species.\n\n## Threats\n\n### Identified Threats\n\n1.  The resumption of commercial whaling and/or the expansion of scientific whaling\n\nThe impacts of commercial hunting on humpback whale populations have been well documented. While currently banned under the IWC moratorium on commercial whaling, the potential for commercial whaling to recommence exists and pressure may well increase as populations recover.\n\nAn additional area of concern is the potential expansion of de facto commercial whaling under the guise of scientific whaling. The IWC Convention allows member states to issue special permits to kill whales for research purposes and then process these animals for sale. Since 1986, Japan and Iceland have issued special permits for several whale species as part of their scientific whaling research programs. The recent expansion of these programs in the Northern Hemisphere involve the killing of various baleen whales including minke, Bryde's, fin, sperm and sei whales. In addition, since the implementation of the Southern Ocean Sanctuary in 1994, Japan has continued to harvest minke whales there under special permits. It is quite possible that humpback whales will be included in future research programs.\n\n2. Habitat degradation\n\nHumpback whales use habitat seasonally and can typically be found along various parts of the Australian coastline for up to nine months of the year (April to December). Anthropogenic activities have the potential to degrade habitat important to the species. These activities may degrade habitat by operating at times that coincide with the presence of whales, or they may occur when whales are absent, but degrade habitat suitability on a permanent or semi-permanent basis. These activities may include:\n\n-   acoustic pollution (e.g. commercial and recreational vessel noise, and seismic survey activity);\n-   entanglement (e.g. in marine debris, fishing and aquaculture equipment);\n-   physical injury and death from ship strike;\n-   built structures that impact upon habitat availability and/or use (e.g. marinas, wharves, aquaculture installations, mining or drilling infrastructure);\n-   changing water quality and pollution (e.g. runoff from land based agriculture, oil spills, outputs from aquaculture); and\n-   changes to water flow regimes causing extensive sedimentation or erosion or altered currents in near shore habitat (e.g. canals and dredging).\n\nThe species’ dependence on inshore areas means that individual animals may be subject to the impacts from any or all of these activities. Habitat degradation may result in reduced occupancy and/or exclusion of individual whales from suitable habitat, compromised reproductive success, and mortality. It is possible that impacts on a sufficient number of individual whales could lead to broader impacts at the population level, e.g. by reducing recruitment to such an extent that species recovery is impeded. This would be more likely to arise where activities that cause habitat degradation occurred intensively and/or cumulatively, or over a large portion of their range.\n\nIt should be noted that at the time of the writing of this plan, both migratory populations of humpback whales were increasing at the optimum biological rate suggesting that to date habitat degradation has not had a negative impact on population or species recovery. Nevertheless, ongoing monitoring and management are required to ensure that habitat degradation does not become a significant issue.\n\n### Potential threats\n\n1.  Climate and oceanographic change\n\nMost of the world's leading scientists agree that global warming caused by human activity is occurring. The exact implications of these changes are unknown, but it is predicted that there will be reduced productivity of Southern Ocean ecosystems and unpredictable weather events caused by increasing ocean water temperatures, changing ocean currents, rising sea levels and reductions in sea ice.\n\nThe potential impacts of climate and oceanographic change on humpback whales are twofold:\n\n1) Habitat availability\n\nHumpback whale migration, feeding, resting, and calving site selection may be influenced by factors such as ocean currents and water temperature. Any changes in these factors could affect humpback whale population recovery by rendering currently used habitat areas unsuitable.\n\n2) Food availability\n\nChanges to climate and oceanographic processes may also lead to decreased productivity and different patterns of prey distribution and availability. Such changes would certainly effect dependant predators such as humpback whales.\n\n2. Prey depletion due to over harvesting\n\nHumpback whales rely on krill as the main food source and require adequate supplies to accumulate energy reserves essential for migration and breeding. Depletion of krill through over harvesting may be a potential future threat for Australian populations of humpback whales. However, it should be noted that:\n\n-   the krill fishery is managed through the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) on an ecosystem basis which takes into account the needs of predators such as whales; and\n-   while the fishery is likely to grow, fishing currently occurs well within the current precautionary limits.\n\n## Actions to achieve the objectives\n\nMonitor population status and assess habitat\n\n1.  Implement a program to measure population abundance, trends and recovery for Australian populations of humpback whales\n\n-   Included within this activity is the need to:\n    -   gather information on population structures using methodologies including genetic analyses, comparisons of photo identification and telemetry studies;\n    -   establish models for measuring recovery and species status, incorporating a range of indicators (e.g. current and pre-whaling population estimates, population structure, use of habitats etc); and\n    -   continue to collect long-term data sets using standardised survey methodologies for humpback whales in a statistically robust manner.\n\n2. Implement a program to better define the characteristics (spatial, temporal, and physical) of calving, resting, feeding, and migratory areas\n\n-   Included within this activity is the need to:\n    -   determine the values and characteristics of important migratory pathways and aggregation areas (calving, resting, and feeding) particularly in areas where human use is likely to impact upon the species;\n    -   gather information on movements, migrations, and feeding grounds – e.g. through the use of satellite tracking and other survey methods; and\n    -   examine the historical and potential future use of humpback whale habitat with a view to defining these areas and assessing human use activities to ensure impacts are appropriately managed and regulated.\n\nProtect the species from threats\n\n3. Prevent commercial whaling and move to ban scientific whaling\n\n-   Australia should maintain its position on promoting high levels of protection for humpback whales in all relevant international agreements including the IWC, CITES, CMS, fisheries-related agreements, and Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM).\n-   Australia should continue to support a ban on directed take of humpback whales.\n\n4. Protect habitat important to the survival of the species\n\n-   Ensure that in areas important to the survival of the species environmental assessment process and research activities are in place to determine the level of impact and threat of human activities, and implement management measures to ensure the ongoing recovery of the species. This should include, but not be limited to, the following actions:\n    -   assess and manage acoustic pollution – including the development and application of administrative guidelines under the EPBC Act such as the “Guidelines on the application of the EPBC Act to interactions between offshore seismic operations and larger cetaceans”;\n    -   encourage best practice approaches that will reduce the likelihood of humpback whales being entangled in marine debris, fishing and aquaculture equipment. If entanglements occur, manage the impact of individual entanglements through the application of national standards for disentangling large cetaceans;\n    -   ensure that humpback whale habitat requirements are considered in the establishment and management of marine conservation areas and reserves;\n    -   manage the potential impacts of tourism – e.g. through the application of consistent Commonwealth and State tourism and whale watching regulations; and\n    -   assess and manage physical disturbance and development activities (such as ship‑strike, aquaculture, pollution, recreational boating, naval activities, and exploration and extraction industries) – including the application of environmental impact assessment and approvals and the development of industry guidelines and State/Commonwealth government regulations.\n-   Implement education programs to inform marine users (e.g. whale watchers, fishermen, and shipping crews using important habitat) about best practice behaviours and regulations when interacting with whales.\n\n5. Monitor and manage the potential impacts of prey depletion due to over harvesting\n\n-   Improve knowledge of humpback whale feeding ecology in order to determine if or when prey depletion becomes a threat.\n-   Australia should support regional ecosystem approaches to krill management through its involvement in CCAMLR and other fora.\n\n6. Monitor climate and oceanographic change\n\n-   Develop an understanding of the effects of climate and oceanographic change on humpback whale populations to determine if species survival and recovery are being, or are likely to be affected.\n\n## Major benefits to other native species or ecological communities\n\nAs the humpback whale is both a coastal and oceanic ranging species, marine mammal protection regimes may have benefit for other cetaceans found within Australian waters, including the large whales - blue, Bryde’s, minke, fin, sei, southern right and sperm whales. Conservation measures pertaining to calving and resting habitats may also benefit small cetaceans and other species in coastal waters.\n\nImplementation of this plan is unlikely to have negative impacts on any other native species or ecological community.\n\n## Duration and cost of the recovery process\n\nIt is anticipated that the recovery process will take longer than the life of the plan (2005-2010), which should be reviewed after five years. A recovery plan for the species should remain in place until such time that the populations of humpback whales utilising Australian waters has improved to the point that the populations are considered secure.\n\nThe cost of this plan will be met through various direct and indirect funding activities undertaken by the Australian Government, State and Territory governments, researchers, conservation groups, marine based industries and the Australian public. Costing of specific actions will be determined at the time of activity.\n\n## Role and interests of Indigenous people\n\nMany marine mammal species have cultural significance to Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people. Recognising this cultural connection to whales is important. No record has been found of whale hunting before the arrival of Europeans, although it is likely that some use was made of whales that washed ashore. Indigenous people must be considered if plans for development or use of an area are expected to impact upon indigenous ownership or native title interests. Agreements between government and Indigenous people are essential and serve to increase the involvement of all parties with a stake in the welfare and recovery of whales.\n\n## Affected interests\n\nOrganisations likely to be affected by the actions proposed in this plan include the following:\n\n| Australian Government:Australian Fisheries Management AuthorityAustralian Maritime Safety AuthorityDepartment of Agriculture, Fisheries and ForestryDepartment of DefenceDepartment of Foreign Affairs and TradeDepartment of Industry, Tourism and ResourcesDepartment of the Environment and HeritageGreat Barrier Reef Marine Park AuthorityIndigenous Land CorporationIndustry and Non-Government Organisations:Aquaculture industryCommercial fishers and associationsCommercial shippingConservation groupsEnergy distribution networksIndigenous Land Councils and communitiesLocal communitiesOil and gas exploration and production industryRecreational boating clubs and associationsRecreational fishers and associationsStrandings/volunteer networksUniversities and other research organisationsWhale-watching industry and associations | State/Territory Governments:Department of Conservation and Land Management, WADepartment of Environment and Heritage, SADepartment of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, TASDepartment of Primary Industry, QLDDepartment of Sustainability and Environment, VICEnvironment Protection Agency, QLDFisheries agenciesMuseumsDepartment of Environment and Conservation, NSWParks and Wildlife Commission, NTParks VictoriaShipping, oil and gas exploration and development agencies |\n| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n\n## Social and economic impacts\n\nIt is not anticipated that this plan will have significant economic and/or social impacts in the short or long-term.\n\n## Organisations/persons involved in evaluating the performance of the plan\n\nThe Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC) with the assistance of relevant scientists, managers and other stakeholders should evaluate the performance of this plan and report the results of their review to the Australian Government Minister for the Environment and Heritage.\n\n## Where to get the plan\n\nThis recovery plan is obtainable from:\n\n[http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/recovery/list-common.html](http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/recovery/list-common.html)\n\nWildlife Impact and Protection Section\n\nWildlife Conservation Branch\n\nDepartment of the Environment and Heritage\n\nGPO Box 787\n\nCanberra ACT 2601","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"Domestic measures","sectionType":"division","heading":"Domestic measures","content":"### Domestic measures\n\nIn Australia, humpback whales are listed as vulnerable under the EPBC Act. The EPBC Act established the Australian Whale Sanctuary and gives high levels of protection to cetaceans in Commonwealth waters. The Australian Whale Sanctuary encompasses the area of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) outside state waters and generally extends 200 nm from the coast, but further in some areas to cover the continental shelf and slope. It also includes the waters around the Australian Antarctic Territory and external territories including Christmas, Macquarie, Heard and McDonald Islands.\n\nWithin the Australian Whale Sanctuary it is an offence to kill, injure, take, trade, keep, move or interfere with a cetacean. The EPBC Act also makes it an offence for Australians to carry out any of these actions beyond the outer limits of the Australian Whale Sanctuary, that is, in international or foreign waters. Other than in the case of killing or taking for live display, permits may be issued by the Australian Government Minister for the Environment and Heritage to carry out these activities (e.g. for the purpose of research).\n\nHumpback whales are protected in all States and Territories under general native species and/or threatened species protection and management legislation.\n\nA number of measures currently exist to manage interactions with all species of whales. These include administrative guidelines under the EPBC Act relating to interactions between offshore seismic operations and whales, and both Commonwealth and State regulations to manage whale watching activities.\n\nWithin the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park activities that will interfere with cetaceans are regulated through the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan 2003.","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"International measures","sectionType":"division","heading":"International measures","content":"### International measures\n\nThe humpback whale is afforded a degree of international protection through listing on Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), on Appendix II of the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS), and as vulnerable under the World Conservation Union’s Red List (IUCN).\n\nIn addition, Australia participates in several other international agreements that directly or indirectly relate to the conservation of marine mammals. Specifically, Australia was a founding member of the International Whaling Commission (IWC), is the host country of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), and a key player in Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM).\n\nWhales are protected from commercial whaling by IWC member states as part of the current moratorium and by the IWC’s Indian Ocean Sanctuary and Southern Ocean Sanctuary. Sanctuaries do not protect whales from whaling under special permit and are reviewed every ten years.\n\nAustralia is also working within the South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) to establish a Memorandum of Understanding for the conservation and management of marine mammals in the South Pacific region, under the Convention on Migratory Species.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"Threats","sectionType":"part","heading":"Threats","content":"## Management practices\n\n### Domestic measures\n\nIn Australia, humpback whales are listed as vulnerable under the EPBC Act. The EPBC Act established the Australian Whale Sanctuary and gives high levels of protection to cetaceans in Commonwealth waters. The Australian Whale Sanctuary encompasses the area of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) outside state waters and generally extends 200 nm from the coast, but further in some areas to cover the continental shelf and slope. It also includes the waters around the Australian Antarctic Territory and external territories including Christmas, Macquarie, Heard and McDonald Islands.\n\nWithin the Australian Whale Sanctuary it is an offence to kill, injure, take, trade, keep, move or interfere with a cetacean. The EPBC Act also makes it an offence for Australians to carry out any of these actions beyond the outer limits of the Australian Whale Sanctuary, that is, in international or foreign waters. Other than in the case of killing or taking for live display, permits may be issued by the Australian Government Minister for the Environment and Heritage to carry out these activities (e.g. for the purpose of research).\n\nHumpback whales are protected in all States and Territories under general native species and/or threatened species protection and management legislation.\n\nA number of measures currently exist to manage interactions with all species of whales. These include administrative guidelines under the EPBC Act relating to interactions between offshore seismic operations and whales, and both Commonwealth and State regulations to manage whale watching activities.\n\nWithin the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park activities that will interfere with cetaceans are regulated through the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan 2003.\n\n### International measures\n\nThe humpback whale is afforded a degree of international protection through listing on Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), on Appendix II of the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS), and as vulnerable under the World Conservation Union’s Red List (IUCN).\n\nIn addition, Australia participates in several other international agreements that directly or indirectly relate to the conservation of marine mammals. Specifically, Australia was a founding member of the International Whaling Commission (IWC), is the host country of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), and a key player in Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM).\n\nWhales are protected from commercial whaling by IWC member states as part of the current moratorium and by the IWC’s Indian Ocean Sanctuary and Southern Ocean Sanctuary. Sanctuaries do not protect whales from whaling under special permit and are reviewed every ten years.\n\nAustralia is also working within the South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) to establish a Memorandum of Understanding for the conservation and management of marine mammals in the South Pacific region, under the Convention on Migratory Species.\n\n## Threats\n\n### Identified Threats\n\n1.  The resumption of commercial whaling and/or the expansion of scientific whaling\n\nThe impacts of commercial hunting on humpback whale populations have been well documented. While currently banned under the IWC moratorium on commercial whaling, the potential for commercial whaling to recommence exists and pressure may well increase as populations recover.\n\nAn additional area of concern is the potential expansion of de facto commercial whaling under the guise of scientific whaling. The IWC Convention allows member states to issue special permits to kill whales for research purposes and then process these animals for sale. Since 1986, Japan and Iceland have issued special permits for several whale species as part of their scientific whaling research programs. The recent expansion of these programs in the Northern Hemisphere involve the killing of various baleen whales including minke, Bryde's, fin, sperm and sei whales. In addition, since the implementation of the Southern Ocean Sanctuary in 1994, Japan has continued to harvest minke whales there under special permits. It is quite possible that humpback whales will be included in future research programs.\n\n2. Habitat degradation\n\nHumpback whales use habitat seasonally and can typically be found along various parts of the Australian coastline for up to nine months of the year (April to December). Anthropogenic activities have the potential to degrade habitat important to the species. These activities may degrade habitat by operating at times that coincide with the presence of whales, or they may occur when whales are absent, but degrade habitat suitability on a permanent or semi-permanent basis. These activities may include:\n\n-   acoustic pollution (e.g. commercial and recreational vessel noise, and seismic survey activity);\n-   entanglement (e.g. in marine debris, fishing and aquaculture equipment);\n-   physical injury and death from ship strike;\n-   built structures that impact upon habitat availability and/or use (e.g. marinas, wharves, aquaculture installations, mining or drilling infrastructure);\n-   changing water quality and pollution (e.g. runoff from land based agriculture, oil spills, outputs from aquaculture); and\n-   changes to water flow regimes causing extensive sedimentation or erosion or altered currents in near shore habitat (e.g. canals and dredging).\n\nThe species’ dependence on inshore areas means that individual animals may be subject to the impacts from any or all of these activities. Habitat degradation may result in reduced occupancy and/or exclusion of individual whales from suitable habitat, compromised reproductive success, and mortality. It is possible that impacts on a sufficient number of individual whales could lead to broader impacts at the population level, e.g. by reducing recruitment to such an extent that species recovery is impeded. This would be more likely to arise where activities that cause habitat degradation occurred intensively and/or cumulatively, or over a large portion of their range.\n\nIt should be noted that at the time of the writing of this plan, both migratory populations of humpback whales were increasing at the optimum biological rate suggesting that to date habitat degradation has not had a negative impact on population or species recovery. Nevertheless, ongoing monitoring and management are required to ensure that habitat degradation does not become a significant issue.\n\n### Potential threats\n\n1.  Climate and oceanographic change\n\nMost of the world's leading scientists agree that global warming caused by human activity is occurring. The exact implications of these changes are unknown, but it is predicted that there will be reduced productivity of Southern Ocean ecosystems and unpredictable weather events caused by increasing ocean water temperatures, changing ocean currents, rising sea levels and reductions in sea ice.\n\nThe potential impacts of climate and oceanographic change on humpback whales are twofold:\n\n1) Habitat availability\n\nHumpback whale migration, feeding, resting, and calving site selection may be influenced by factors such as ocean currents and water temperature. Any changes in these factors could affect humpback whale population recovery by rendering currently used habitat areas unsuitable.\n\n2) Food availability\n\nChanges to climate and oceanographic processes may also lead to decreased productivity and different patterns of prey distribution and availability. Such changes would certainly effect dependant predators such as humpback whales.\n\n2. Prey depletion due to over harvesting\n\nHumpback whales rely on krill as the main food source and require adequate supplies to accumulate energy reserves essential for migration and breeding. Depletion of krill through over harvesting may be a potential future threat for Australian populations of humpback whales. However, it should be noted that:\n\n-   the krill fishery is managed through the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) on an ecosystem basis which takes into account the needs of predators such as whales; and\n-   while the fishery is likely to grow, fishing currently occurs well within the current precautionary limits.\n\n## Actions to achieve the objectives\n\nMonitor population status and assess habitat\n\n1.  Implement a program to measure population abundance, trends and recovery for Australian populations of humpback whales\n\n-   Included within this activity is the need to:\n    -   gather information on population structures using methodologies including genetic analyses, comparisons of photo identification and telemetry studies;\n    -   establish models for measuring recovery and species status, incorporating a range of indicators (e.g. current and pre-whaling population estimates, population structure, use of habitats etc); and\n    -   continue to collect long-term data sets using standardised survey methodologies for humpback whales in a statistically robust manner.\n\n2. Implement a program to better define the characteristics (spatial, temporal, and physical) of calving, resting, feeding, and migratory areas\n\n-   Included within this activity is the need to:\n    -   determine the values and characteristics of important migratory pathways and aggregation areas (calving, resting, and feeding) particularly in areas where human use is likely to impact upon the species;\n    -   gather information on movements, migrations, and feeding grounds – e.g. through the use of satellite tracking and other survey methods; and\n    -   examine the historical and potential future use of humpback whale habitat with a view to defining these areas and assessing human use activities to ensure impacts are appropriately managed and regulated.\n\nProtect the species from threats\n\n3. Prevent commercial whaling and move to ban scientific whaling\n\n-   Australia should maintain its position on promoting high levels of protection for humpback whales in all relevant international agreements including the IWC, CITES, CMS, fisheries-related agreements, and Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM).\n-   Australia should continue to support a ban on directed take of humpback whales.\n\n4. Protect habitat important to the survival of the species\n\n-   Ensure that in areas important to the survival of the species environmental assessment process and research activities are in place to determine the level of impact and threat of human activities, and implement management measures to ensure the ongoing recovery of the species. This should include, but not be limited to, the following actions:\n    -   assess and manage acoustic pollution – including the development and application of administrative guidelines under the EPBC Act such as the “Guidelines on the application of the EPBC Act to interactions between offshore seismic operations and larger cetaceans”;\n    -   encourage best practice approaches that will reduce the likelihood of humpback whales being entangled in marine debris, fishing and aquaculture equipment. If entanglements occur, manage the impact of individual entanglements through the application of national standards for disentangling large cetaceans;\n    -   ensure that humpback whale habitat requirements are considered in the establishment and management of marine conservation areas and reserves;\n    -   manage the potential impacts of tourism – e.g. through the application of consistent Commonwealth and State tourism and whale watching regulations; and\n    -   assess and manage physical disturbance and development activities (such as ship‑strike, aquaculture, pollution, recreational boating, naval activities, and exploration and extraction industries) – including the application of environmental impact assessment and approvals and the development of industry guidelines and State/Commonwealth government regulations.\n-   Implement education programs to inform marine users (e.g. whale watchers, fishermen, and shipping crews using important habitat) about best practice behaviours and regulations when interacting with whales.\n\n5. Monitor and manage the potential impacts of prey depletion due to over harvesting\n\n-   Improve knowledge of humpback whale feeding ecology in order to determine if or when prey depletion becomes a threat.\n-   Australia should support regional ecosystem approaches to krill management through its involvement in CCAMLR and other fora.\n\n6. Monitor climate and oceanographic change\n\n-   Develop an understanding of the effects of climate and oceanographic change on humpback whale populations to determine if species survival and recovery are being, or are likely to be affected.\n\n## Major benefits to other native species or ecological communities\n\nAs the humpback whale is both a coastal and oceanic ranging species, marine mammal protection regimes may have benefit for other cetaceans found within Australian waters, including the large whales - blue, Bryde’s, minke, fin, sei, southern right and sperm whales. Conservation measures pertaining to calving and resting habitats may also benefit small cetaceans and other species in coastal waters.\n\nImplementation of this plan is unlikely to have negative impacts on any other native species or ecological community.\n\n## Duration and cost of the recovery process\n\nIt is anticipated that the recovery process will take longer than the life of the plan (2005-2010), which should be reviewed after five years. A recovery plan for the species should remain in place until such time that the populations of humpback whales utilising Australian waters has improved to the point that the populations are considered secure.\n\nThe cost of this plan will be met through various direct and indirect funding activities undertaken by the Australian Government, State and Territory governments, researchers, conservation groups, marine based industries and the Australian public. Costing of specific actions will be determined at the time of activity.\n\n## Role and interests of Indigenous people\n\nMany marine mammal species have cultural significance to Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people. Recognising this cultural connection to whales is important. No record has been found of whale hunting before the arrival of Europeans, although it is likely that some use was made of whales that washed ashore. Indigenous people must be considered if plans for development or use of an area are expected to impact upon indigenous ownership or native title interests. Agreements between government and Indigenous people are essential and serve to increase the involvement of all parties with a stake in the welfare and recovery of whales.\n\n## Affected interests\n\nOrganisations likely to be affected by the actions proposed in this plan include the following:\n\n| Australian Government:Australian Fisheries Management AuthorityAustralian Maritime Safety AuthorityDepartment of Agriculture, Fisheries and ForestryDepartment of DefenceDepartment of Foreign Affairs and TradeDepartment of Industry, Tourism and ResourcesDepartment of the Environment and HeritageGreat Barrier Reef Marine Park AuthorityIndigenous Land CorporationIndustry and Non-Government Organisations:Aquaculture industryCommercial fishers and associationsCommercial shippingConservation groupsEnergy distribution networksIndigenous Land Councils and communitiesLocal communitiesOil and gas exploration and production industryRecreational boating clubs and associationsRecreational fishers and associationsStrandings/volunteer networksUniversities and other research organisationsWhale-watching industry and associations | State/Territory Governments:Department of Conservation and Land Management, WADepartment of Environment and Heritage, SADepartment of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, TASDepartment of Primary Industry, QLDDepartment of Sustainability and Environment, VICEnvironment Protection Agency, QLDFisheries agenciesMuseumsDepartment of Environment and Conservation, NSWParks and Wildlife Commission, NTParks VictoriaShipping, oil and gas exploration and development agencies |\n| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n\n## Social and economic impacts\n\nIt is not anticipated that this plan will have significant economic and/or social impacts in the short or long-term.\n\n## Organisations/persons involved in evaluating the performance of the plan\n\nThe Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC) with the assistance of relevant scientists, managers and other stakeholders should evaluate the performance of this plan and report the results of their review to the Australian Government Minister for the Environment and Heritage.\n\n## Where to get the plan\n\nThis recovery plan is obtainable from:\n\n[http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/recovery/list-common.html](http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/recovery/list-common.html)\n\nWildlife Impact and Protection Section\n\nWildlife Conservation Branch\n\nDepartment of the Environment and Heritage\n\nGPO Box 787\n\nCanberra ACT 2601","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"Identified Threats","sectionType":"division","heading":"Identified Threats","content":"### Identified Threats\n\n1.  The resumption of commercial whaling and/or the expansion of scientific whaling\n\nThe impacts of commercial hunting on humpback whale populations have been well documented. While currently banned under the IWC moratorium on commercial whaling, the potential for commercial whaling to recommence exists and pressure may well increase as populations recover.\n\nAn additional area of concern is the potential expansion of de facto commercial whaling under the guise of scientific whaling. The IWC Convention allows member states to issue special permits to kill whales for research purposes and then process these animals for sale. Since 1986, Japan and Iceland have issued special permits for several whale species as part of their scientific whaling research programs. The recent expansion of these programs in the Northern Hemisphere involve the killing of various baleen whales including minke, Bryde's, fin, sperm and sei whales. In addition, since the implementation of the Southern Ocean Sanctuary in 1994, Japan has continued to harvest minke whales there under special permits. It is quite possible that humpback whales will be included in future research programs.\n\n2. Habitat degradation\n\nHumpback whales use habitat seasonally and can typically be found along various parts of the Australian coastline for up to nine months of the year (April to December). Anthropogenic activities have the potential to degrade habitat important to the species. These activities may degrade habitat by operating at times that coincide with the presence of whales, or they may occur when whales are absent, but degrade habitat suitability on a permanent or semi-permanent basis. These activities may include:\n\n-   acoustic pollution (e.g. commercial and recreational vessel noise, and seismic survey activity);\n-   entanglement (e.g. in marine debris, fishing and aquaculture equipment);\n-   physical injury and death from ship strike;\n-   built structures that impact upon habitat availability and/or use (e.g. marinas, wharves, aquaculture installations, mining or drilling infrastructure);\n-   changing water quality and pollution (e.g. runoff from land based agriculture, oil spills, outputs from aquaculture); and\n-   changes to water flow regimes causing extensive sedimentation or erosion or altered currents in near shore habitat (e.g. canals and dredging).\n\nThe species’ dependence on inshore areas means that individual animals may be subject to the impacts from any or all of these activities. Habitat degradation may result in reduced occupancy and/or exclusion of individual whales from suitable habitat, compromised reproductive success, and mortality. It is possible that impacts on a sufficient number of individual whales could lead to broader impacts at the population level, e.g. by reducing recruitment to such an extent that species recovery is impeded. This would be more likely to arise where activities that cause habitat degradation occurred intensively and/or cumulatively, or over a large portion of their range.\n\nIt should be noted that at the time of the writing of this plan, both migratory populations of humpback whales were increasing at the optimum biological rate suggesting that to date habitat degradation has not had a negative impact on population or species recovery. Nevertheless, ongoing monitoring and management are required to ensure that habitat degradation does not become a significant issue.","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"Potential threats","sectionType":"division","heading":"Potential threats","content":"### Potential threats\n\n1.  Climate and oceanographic change\n\nMost of the world's leading scientists agree that global warming caused by human activity is occurring. The exact implications of these changes are unknown, but it is predicted that there will be reduced productivity of Southern Ocean ecosystems and unpredictable weather events caused by increasing ocean water temperatures, changing ocean currents, rising sea levels and reductions in sea ice.\n\nThe potential impacts of climate and oceanographic change on humpback whales are twofold:\n\n1) Habitat availability\n\nHumpback whale migration, feeding, resting, and calving site selection may be influenced by factors such as ocean currents and water temperature. Any changes in these factors could affect humpback whale population recovery by rendering currently used habitat areas unsuitable.\n\n2) Food availability\n\nChanges to climate and oceanographic processes may also lead to decreased productivity and different patterns of prey distribution and availability. Such changes would certainly effect dependant predators such as humpback whales.\n\n2. Prey depletion due to over harvesting\n\nHumpback whales rely on krill as the main food source and require adequate supplies to accumulate energy reserves essential for migration and breeding. Depletion of krill through over harvesting may be a potential future threat for Australian populations of humpback whales. However, it should be noted that:\n\n-   the krill fishery is managed through the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) on an ecosystem basis which takes into account the needs of predators such as whales; and\n-   while the fishery is likely to grow, fishing currently occurs well within the current precautionary limits.","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"Actions to achieve the objectives","sectionType":"part","heading":"Actions to achieve the objectives","content":"## Actions to achieve the objectives\n\nMonitor population status and assess habitat\n\n1.  Implement a program to measure population abundance, trends and recovery for Australian populations of humpback whales\n\n-   Included within this activity is the need to:\n    -   gather information on population structures using methodologies including genetic analyses, comparisons of photo identification and telemetry studies;\n    -   establish models for measuring recovery and species status, incorporating a range of indicators (e.g. current and pre-whaling population estimates, population structure, use of habitats etc); and\n    -   continue to collect long-term data sets using standardised survey methodologies for humpback whales in a statistically robust manner.\n\n2. Implement a program to better define the characteristics (spatial, temporal, and physical) of calving, resting, feeding, and migratory areas\n\n-   Included within this activity is the need to:\n    -   determine the values and characteristics of important migratory pathways and aggregation areas (calving, resting, and feeding) particularly in areas where human use is likely to impact upon the species;\n    -   gather information on movements, migrations, and feeding grounds – e.g. through the use of satellite tracking and other survey methods; and\n    -   examine the historical and potential future use of humpback whale habitat with a view to defining these areas and assessing human use activities to ensure impacts are appropriately managed and regulated.\n\nProtect the species from threats\n\n3. Prevent commercial whaling and move to ban scientific whaling\n\n-   Australia should maintain its position on promoting high levels of protection for humpback whales in all relevant international agreements including the IWC, CITES, CMS, fisheries-related agreements, and Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM).\n-   Australia should continue to support a ban on directed take of humpback whales.\n\n4. Protect habitat important to the survival of the species\n\n-   Ensure that in areas important to the survival of the species environmental assessment process and research activities are in place to determine the level of impact and threat of human activities, and implement management measures to ensure the ongoing recovery of the species. This should include, but not be limited to, the following actions:\n    -   assess and manage acoustic pollution – including the development and application of administrative guidelines under the EPBC Act such as the “Guidelines on the application of the EPBC Act to interactions between offshore seismic operations and larger cetaceans”;\n    -   encourage best practice approaches that will reduce the likelihood of humpback whales being entangled in marine debris, fishing and aquaculture equipment. If entanglements occur, manage the impact of individual entanglements through the application of national standards for disentangling large cetaceans;\n    -   ensure that humpback whale habitat requirements are considered in the establishment and management of marine conservation areas and reserves;\n    -   manage the potential impacts of tourism – e.g. through the application of consistent Commonwealth and State tourism and whale watching regulations; and\n    -   assess and manage physical disturbance and development activities (such as ship‑strike, aquaculture, pollution, recreational boating, naval activities, and exploration and extraction industries) – including the application of environmental impact assessment and approvals and the development of industry guidelines and State/Commonwealth government regulations.\n-   Implement education programs to inform marine users (e.g. whale watchers, fishermen, and shipping crews using important habitat) about best practice behaviours and regulations when interacting with whales.\n\n5. Monitor and manage the potential impacts of prey depletion due to over harvesting\n\n-   Improve knowledge of humpback whale feeding ecology in order to determine if or when prey depletion becomes a threat.\n-   Australia should support regional ecosystem approaches to krill management through its involvement in CCAMLR and other fora.\n\n6. Monitor climate and oceanographic change\n\n-   Develop an understanding of the effects of climate and oceanographic change on humpback whale populations to determine if species survival and recovery are being, or are likely to be affected.","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"Major benefits to other native species o","sectionType":"part","heading":"Major benefits to other native species or ecological communities","content":"## Major benefits to other native species or ecological communities\n\nAs the humpback whale is both a coastal and oceanic ranging species, marine mammal protection regimes may have benefit for other cetaceans found within Australian waters, including the large whales - blue, Bryde’s, minke, fin, sei, southern right and sperm whales. Conservation measures pertaining to calving and resting habitats may also benefit small cetaceans and other species in coastal waters.\n\nImplementation of this plan is unlikely to have negative impacts on any other native species or ecological community.","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"Duration and cost of the recovery proces","sectionType":"part","heading":"Duration and cost of the recovery process","content":"## Duration and cost of the recovery process\n\nIt is anticipated that the recovery process will take longer than the life of the plan (2005-2010), which should be reviewed after five years. A recovery plan for the species should remain in place until such time that the populations of humpback whales utilising Australian waters has improved to the point that the populations are considered secure.\n\nThe cost of this plan will be met through various direct and indirect funding activities undertaken by the Australian Government, State and Territory governments, researchers, conservation groups, marine based industries and the Australian public. Costing of specific actions will be determined at the time of activity.","sortOrder":12},{"sectionNumber":"Role and interests of Indigenous people","sectionType":"part","heading":"Role and interests of Indigenous people","content":"## Role and interests of Indigenous people\n\nMany marine mammal species have cultural significance to Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people. Recognising this cultural connection to whales is important. No record has been found of whale hunting before the arrival of Europeans, although it is likely that some use was made of whales that washed ashore. Indigenous people must be considered if plans for development or use of an area are expected to impact upon indigenous ownership or native title interests. Agreements between government and Indigenous people are essential and serve to increase the involvement of all parties with a stake in the welfare and recovery of whales.","sortOrder":13},{"sectionNumber":"Affected interests","sectionType":"part","heading":"Affected interests","content":"## Affected interests\n\nOrganisations likely to be affected by the actions proposed in this plan include the following:\n\n| Australian Government:Australian Fisheries Management AuthorityAustralian Maritime Safety AuthorityDepartment of Agriculture, Fisheries and ForestryDepartment of DefenceDepartment of Foreign Affairs and TradeDepartment of Industry, Tourism and ResourcesDepartment of the Environment and HeritageGreat Barrier Reef Marine Park AuthorityIndigenous Land CorporationIndustry and Non-Government Organisations:Aquaculture industryCommercial fishers and associationsCommercial shippingConservation groupsEnergy distribution networksIndigenous Land Councils and communitiesLocal communitiesOil and gas exploration and production industryRecreational boating clubs and associationsRecreational fishers and associationsStrandings/volunteer networksUniversities and other research organisationsWhale-watching industry and associations | State/Territory Governments:Department of Conservation and Land Management, WADepartment of Environment and Heritage, SADepartment of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, TASDepartment of Primary Industry, QLDDepartment of Sustainability and Environment, VICEnvironment Protection Agency, QLDFisheries agenciesMuseumsDepartment of Environment and Conservation, NSWParks and Wildlife Commission, NTParks VictoriaShipping, oil and gas exploration and development agencies |\n| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |","sortOrder":14},{"sectionNumber":"Social and economic impacts","sectionType":"part","heading":"Social and economic impacts","content":"## Social and economic impacts\n\nIt is not anticipated that this plan will have significant economic and/or social impacts in the short or long-term.","sortOrder":15},{"sectionNumber":"Organisations/persons involved in evalua","sectionType":"part","heading":"Organisations/persons involved in evaluating the performance of the plan","content":"## Organisations/persons involved in evaluating the performance of the plan\n\nThe Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC) with the assistance of relevant scientists, managers and other stakeholders should evaluate the performance of this plan and report the results of their review to the Australian Government Minister for the Environment and Heritage.","sortOrder":16},{"sectionNumber":"Where to get the plan","sectionType":"part","heading":"Where to get the plan","content":"## Where to get the plan\n\nThis recovery plan is obtainable from:\n\n[http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/recovery/list-common.html](http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/recovery/list-common.html)\n\nWildlife Impact and Protection Section\n\nWildlife Conservation Branch\n\nDepartment of the Environment and Heritage\n\nGPO Box 787\n\nCanberra ACT 2601","sortOrder":17}],"analysis":{"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":5,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"No. The plan remains focused on recovering humpback whale populations and maintaining protections as set out in its Objectives. It directs monitoring, habitat identification, threat management, and international engagement without expanding into unrelated policy areas; it anticipates recovery taking longer than 2005–2010 and calls for a five‑year review and continued funding arrangements (see 'Objectives' and 'Duration and cost of the recovery process')."},"complexity_factors":["Multi-jurisdictional governance — overlapping Commonwealth, State/Territory and international measures (see 'Domestic measures' and 'International measures')","Scientific uncertainty — undefined ‘secure in the wild’ metric and incomplete habitat criticality requiring research and modelling (see 'Objectives' and 'Habitat important ...')","Wide stakeholder set — government agencies, industries (fishing, oil & gas, tourism), Indigenous groups and NGOs increase coordination and consultation needs (see 'Affected interests')","Policy rather than prescriptive law — many actions are programs, guidelines and monitoring requirements rather than clear, enforceable rules, raising implementation discretion","Permit and ministerial discretion under EPBC Act for research and activities affecting cetaceans creates case-by-case regulatory decisions (see 'Domestic measures')","Long timeframe and adaptive review — recovery expected beyond plan life, with a 5-year review, requiring sustained funding and institutional commitment (see 'Duration and cost')","Unquantified cost-sharing and unspecified activity-level costing increases budgetary and accountability complexity (see 'Duration and cost')","Multiple threat vectors (direct take, acoustic pollution, ship-strike, entanglement, climate change, prey dynamics) requiring different technical responses and cross-sector regulation","Reliance on international fora (IWC, CITES, CCAMLR, CMS) means domestic outcomes depend partly on multilateral cooperation and periodic treaty reviews","Monitoring burden — need for standardised, statistically robust long-term surveys, genetics, photo-ID and telemetry increases technical and operational complexity (see 'Actions to achieve the objectives')"],"plain_english_summary":"This recovery plan sets objectives and actions to restore humpback whale populations using Australian waters by monitoring abundance and habitat, managing threats (e.g. whaling, habitat degradation, prey depletion, acoustic disturbance), and maintaining domestic and international protections. It applies to Commonwealth, State and Territory agencies, marine industries, researchers, Indigenous groups and coastal communities. Costs are to be shared across governments, researchers, industry and the public; decisions about permits and protections are made under the EPBC Act (Minister) and performance is evaluated by the TSSC."},"kimi_summary":{"_metrics":{"model":"kimi-k2.5","source":"moonshot-realtime","completionTokens":2018},"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":3,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The document remains focused on its stated purpose: recovery of humpback whale populations in Australian waters. It does not expand beyond species conservation to address broader marine ecosystem management, though it acknowledges related benefits for other cetaceans."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple international treaties referenced (IWC, CITES, CMS, CCAMLR, Antarctic Treaty)","Cross-jurisdictional coordination required between Commonwealth, six States and Territories","Qualitative performance criteria ('secure in the wild') requiring future quantification","Extensive stakeholder table listing 25+ organisations across government, industry and community","Scientific terminology (baleen, telemetry, oceanographic) requiring domain knowledge"],"plain_english_summary":"This 5-year recovery blueprint aims to rebuild Australia’s east and west coast humpback populations—decimated by historical whaling—by making them secure, restoring their former ranges, and keeping protections in place. It matters to fisheries, shipping, oil and gas, tourism, researchers and Indigenous communities because it calls for coordinated monitoring, habitat safeguards, reduced human impacts (noise, entanglement, strikes), and international advocacy to ensure long-term survival."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/humpback-whale-recovery-plan-2005-2010","history":"/api/acts/humpback-whale-recovery-plan-2005-2010/history","analysis":"/api/acts/humpback-whale-recovery-plan-2005-2010/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/humpback-whale-recovery-plan-2005-2010/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/humpback-whale-recovery-plan-2005-2010/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/humpback-whale-recovery-plan-2005-2010/documents"}}