{"id":"F2019L00320","name":"Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023","slug":"federal-safety-commissioner-accreditation-scheme-rules-2023","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":98925,"registerId":"commonwealth-F2019L00320-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-02","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"Part 1","sectionType":"part","heading":"Preliminary","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Name","content":"#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"3","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authority","content":"#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"4","sectionType":"section","heading":"Schedules","content":"#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"5","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions","content":"#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"Part 2","sectionType":"part","heading":"Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary\n\n#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.\n\n#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .\n\n#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.\n\n#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.\n\n## Part 2—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n### Division 1—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.\n\n### Division 2—Accrediting authority\n\n#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.\n\n### Division 3—How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme\n\n#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.\n\n#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.\n\n#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.\n\n#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.\n\n### Division 4—Pre-accreditation audits\n\n#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).\n\n### Division 5—Notice of decision\n\n#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 6—Conditions of accreditation\n\n#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.\n\n#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).\n\n#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n### Division 7—Breach of conditions etc.\n\n#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.\n\n#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 8—Variation and cancellation of accreditation\n\n#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.\n\n#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.\n\n### Division 9—Review of decisions\n\n#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```\n\n#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.\n\n#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.\n\n#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).\n\n## Part 3—Prescribed building work\n\n#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.\n\n## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions\n\n#### 27 Transitional—things done under repealed instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.\n\n#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"Division 1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary\n\n#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.\n\n#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .\n\n#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.\n\n#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.\n\n## Part 2—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n### Division 1—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.\n\n### Division 2—Accrediting authority\n\n#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.\n\n### Division 3—How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme\n\n#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.\n\n#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.\n\n#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.\n\n#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.\n\n### Division 4—Pre-accreditation audits\n\n#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).\n\n### Division 5—Notice of decision\n\n#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 6—Conditions of accreditation\n\n#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.\n\n#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).\n\n#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n### Division 7—Breach of conditions etc.\n\n#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.\n\n#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 8—Variation and cancellation of accreditation\n\n#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.\n\n#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.\n\n### Division 9—Review of decisions\n\n#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```\n\n#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.\n\n#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.\n\n#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).\n\n## Part 3—Prescribed building work\n\n#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.\n\n## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions\n\n#### 27 Transitional—things done under repealed instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.\n\n#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"6","sectionType":"section","heading":"Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme","content":"#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"Division 2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Accrediting authority","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary\n\n#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.\n\n#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .\n\n#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.\n\n#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.\n\n## Part 2—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n### Division 1—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.\n\n### Division 2—Accrediting authority\n\n#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.\n\n### Division 3—How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme\n\n#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.\n\n#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.\n\n#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.\n\n#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.\n\n### Division 4—Pre-accreditation audits\n\n#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).\n\n### Division 5—Notice of decision\n\n#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 6—Conditions of accreditation\n\n#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.\n\n#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).\n\n#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n### Division 7—Breach of conditions etc.\n\n#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.\n\n#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 8—Variation and cancellation of accreditation\n\n#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.\n\n#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.\n\n### Division 9—Review of decisions\n\n#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```\n\n#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.\n\n#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.\n\n#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).\n\n## Part 3—Prescribed building work\n\n#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.\n\n## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions\n\n#### 27 Transitional—things done under repealed instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.\n\n#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"7","sectionType":"section","heading":"Accrediting authority","content":"#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"Division 3","sectionType":"division","heading":"How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary\n\n#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.\n\n#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .\n\n#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.\n\n#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.\n\n## Part 2—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n### Division 1—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.\n\n### Division 2—Accrediting authority\n\n#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.\n\n### Division 3—How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme\n\n#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.\n\n#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.\n\n#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.\n\n#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.\n\n### Division 4—Pre-accreditation audits\n\n#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).\n\n### Division 5—Notice of decision\n\n#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 6—Conditions of accreditation\n\n#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.\n\n#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).\n\n#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n### Division 7—Breach of conditions etc.\n\n#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.\n\n#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 8—Variation and cancellation of accreditation\n\n#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.\n\n#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.\n\n### Division 9—Review of decisions\n\n#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```\n\n#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.\n\n#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.\n\n#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).\n\n## Part 3—Prescribed building work\n\n#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.\n\n## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions\n\n#### 27 Transitional—things done under repealed instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.\n\n#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"8","sectionType":"section","heading":"Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner","content":"#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"9","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application for accreditation","content":"#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.","sortOrder":12},{"sectionNumber":"10","sectionType":"section","heading":"Evidence to accompany application","content":"#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.","sortOrder":13},{"sectionNumber":"11","sectionType":"section","heading":"Further information","content":"#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.","sortOrder":14},{"sectionNumber":"Division 4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Pre-accreditation audits","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary\n\n#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.\n\n#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .\n\n#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.\n\n#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.\n\n## Part 2—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n### Division 1—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.\n\n### Division 2—Accrediting authority\n\n#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.\n\n### Division 3—How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme\n\n#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.\n\n#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.\n\n#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.\n\n#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.\n\n### Division 4—Pre-accreditation audits\n\n#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).\n\n### Division 5—Notice of decision\n\n#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 6—Conditions of accreditation\n\n#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.\n\n#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).\n\n#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n### Division 7—Breach of conditions etc.\n\n#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.\n\n#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 8—Variation and cancellation of accreditation\n\n#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.\n\n#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.\n\n### Division 9—Review of decisions\n\n#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```\n\n#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.\n\n#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.\n\n#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).\n\n## Part 3—Prescribed building work\n\n#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.\n\n## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions\n\n#### 27 Transitional—things done under repealed instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.\n\n#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":15},{"sectionNumber":"12","sectionType":"section","heading":"Pre-accreditation audit","content":"#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.","sortOrder":16},{"sectionNumber":"13","sectionType":"section","heading":"Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances","content":"#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).","sortOrder":17},{"sectionNumber":"Division 5","sectionType":"division","heading":"Notice of decision","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary\n\n#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.\n\n#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .\n\n#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.\n\n#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.\n\n## Part 2—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n### Division 1—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.\n\n### Division 2—Accrediting authority\n\n#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.\n\n### Division 3—How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme\n\n#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.\n\n#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.\n\n#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.\n\n#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.\n\n### Division 4—Pre-accreditation audits\n\n#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).\n\n### Division 5—Notice of decision\n\n#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 6—Conditions of accreditation\n\n#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.\n\n#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).\n\n#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n### Division 7—Breach of conditions etc.\n\n#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.\n\n#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 8—Variation and cancellation of accreditation\n\n#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.\n\n#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.\n\n### Division 9—Review of decisions\n\n#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```\n\n#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.\n\n#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.\n\n#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).\n\n## Part 3—Prescribed building work\n\n#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.\n\n## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions\n\n#### 27 Transitional—things done under repealed instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.\n\n#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":18},{"sectionNumber":"14","sectionType":"section","heading":"Notice of decision","content":"#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.","sortOrder":19},{"sectionNumber":"Division 6","sectionType":"division","heading":"Conditions of accreditation","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary\n\n#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.\n\n#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .\n\n#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.\n\n#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.\n\n## Part 2—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n### Division 1—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.\n\n### Division 2—Accrediting authority\n\n#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.\n\n### Division 3—How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme\n\n#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.\n\n#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.\n\n#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.\n\n#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.\n\n### Division 4—Pre-accreditation audits\n\n#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).\n\n### Division 5—Notice of decision\n\n#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 6—Conditions of accreditation\n\n#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.\n\n#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).\n\n#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n### Division 7—Breach of conditions etc.\n\n#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.\n\n#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 8—Variation and cancellation of accreditation\n\n#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.\n\n#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.\n\n### Division 9—Review of decisions\n\n#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```\n\n#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.\n\n#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.\n\n#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).\n\n## Part 3—Prescribed building work\n\n#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.\n\n## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions\n\n#### 27 Transitional—things done under repealed instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.\n\n#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":20},{"sectionNumber":"15","sectionType":"section","heading":"Conditions that apply to all accreditations","content":"#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.","sortOrder":21},{"sectionNumber":"16","sectionType":"section","heading":"Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions","content":"#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).","sortOrder":22},{"sectionNumber":"17","sectionType":"section","heading":"Post‑accreditation audit","content":"#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.","sortOrder":23},{"sectionNumber":"Division 7","sectionType":"division","heading":"Breach of conditions etc.","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary\n\n#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.\n\n#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .\n\n#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.\n\n#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.\n\n## Part 2—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n### Division 1—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.\n\n### Division 2—Accrediting authority\n\n#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.\n\n### Division 3—How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme\n\n#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.\n\n#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.\n\n#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.\n\n#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.\n\n### Division 4—Pre-accreditation audits\n\n#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).\n\n### Division 5—Notice of decision\n\n#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 6—Conditions of accreditation\n\n#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.\n\n#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).\n\n#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n### Division 7—Breach of conditions etc.\n\n#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.\n\n#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 8—Variation and cancellation of accreditation\n\n#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.\n\n#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.\n\n### Division 9—Review of decisions\n\n#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```\n\n#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.\n\n#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.\n\n#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).\n\n## Part 3—Prescribed building work\n\n#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.\n\n## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions\n\n#### 27 Transitional—things done under repealed instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.\n\n#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":24},{"sectionNumber":"18","sectionType":"section","heading":"Breach of conditions","content":"#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.","sortOrder":25},{"sectionNumber":"19","sectionType":"section","heading":"Notices under this Division","content":"#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.","sortOrder":26},{"sectionNumber":"Division 8","sectionType":"division","heading":"Variation and cancellation of accreditation","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary\n\n#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.\n\n#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .\n\n#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.\n\n#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.\n\n## Part 2—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n### Division 1—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.\n\n### Division 2—Accrediting authority\n\n#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.\n\n### Division 3—How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme\n\n#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.\n\n#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.\n\n#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.\n\n#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.\n\n### Division 4—Pre-accreditation audits\n\n#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).\n\n### Division 5—Notice of decision\n\n#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 6—Conditions of accreditation\n\n#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.\n\n#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).\n\n#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n### Division 7—Breach of conditions etc.\n\n#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.\n\n#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 8—Variation and cancellation of accreditation\n\n#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.\n\n#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.\n\n### Division 9—Review of decisions\n\n#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```\n\n#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.\n\n#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.\n\n#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).\n\n## Part 3—Prescribed building work\n\n#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.\n\n## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions\n\n#### 27 Transitional—things done under repealed instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.\n\n#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":27},{"sectionNumber":"20","sectionType":"section","heading":"Variation of accreditation for change of name","content":"#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.","sortOrder":28},{"sectionNumber":"21","sectionType":"section","heading":"Cancellation of accreditation on request","content":"#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.","sortOrder":29},{"sectionNumber":"Division 9","sectionType":"division","heading":"Review of decisions","content":"## Part 1—Preliminary\n\n#### 1 Name\n\n  This instrument is the Federal Safety Commissioner (Accreditation Scheme) Rules 2023.\n\n#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 .\n\n#### 4 Schedules\n\n  Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.\n\n#### 5 Definitions\n\n> Note: A number of expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) accredited person;\n    (b) builder;\n    (c) building contractor;\n    (d) building work;\n    (e) premises.\n  In this instrument:\n\n> AAT means the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.\n\n> Act means the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022.\n\n> applicant: see subsection 8(1).\n\n> intelligence or security agency has the same meaning as in section 85ZL of the Crimes Act 1914.\n\n> joint venture means an unincorporated enterprise that is constituted by 2 or more persons in common and in which:\n\n    (a) each member is not an individual; and\n    (b) at least one member is an accredited person and at least one member is not an accredited person.\n\n> National Construction Code means the National Construction Code as in force immediately before the commencement of this instrument.\n\n> post-accreditation audit means an audit carried out under section 17 for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner ascertaining whether an accredited person has complied, and is complying, with the conditions of the person’s accreditation.\n\n> pre-accreditation audit: see subsection 12(1).\n\n> reviewable decision: see section 22.\n\n> reviewer: see subsection 23(3).\n\n> security has the same meaning as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.\n\n> subcontractor, in relation to building work, means a person who carries out some of the building work under a contract with a builder.\n\n> WHS means work health and safety.\n\n> WHSMS means a work health and safety management system.\n\n## Part 2—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n### Division 1—Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n#### 6 Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(1) of the Act, this Part prescribes the accreditation scheme for persons who wish to carry out building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity.\n\n### Division 2—Accrediting authority\n\n#### 7 Accrediting authority\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(2) of the Act, the Federal Safety Commissioner is the accrediting authority under the accreditation scheme.\n\n### Division 3—How persons are accredited under the accreditation scheme\n\n#### 8 Accreditation by the Federal Safety Commissioner\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit a person for a period if:\n    (a) the person (the applicant) applies for accreditation under section 9; and\n    (b) the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation audit being carried out under section 12; and\n    (c) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (d) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant is complying, and will comply, with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n\n> Note 1: For notice of a decision under this subsection, see section 14.\n\n> Note 2: For conditions of accreditation, see sections 15 and 16 and paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The period of accreditation must not exceed 6 years, and may not be extended.\n\n> Note: To remain accredited after the end of a period of accreditation, an accredited person must apply for a new accreditation.\n\n  (3) In making a decision under subsection (1), the Federal Safety Commissioner must have regard to the following matters:\n    (a) the applicant’s WHSMS;\n    (b) the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (c) the applicant’s record in relation to workplace safety;\n    (d) subject to section 13, the findings of a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant.\n  (4) The Federal Safety Commissioner must also have regard to the performance of the applicant in relation to the following focus points:\n    (a) demonstrated senior management commitment to WHS;\n    (b) demonstrated effective subcontractor WHS management;\n    (c) integration of safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (d) whole of project WHS consultation and communication;\n    (e) whole of project WHS performance measurement;\n    (f) WHS training requirements.\n\n#### 9 Application for accreditation\n\n  (1) A person may apply to the Federal Safety Commissioner for accreditation under the accreditation scheme.\n  (2) The application must:\n    (a) be made in a form approved by the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) include an indication that the applicant has agreed to a pre-accreditation‑ audit being carried out under section 12.\n\n#### 10 Evidence to accompany application\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), the following must accompany an application for accreditation:\n    (a) evidence of the applicant’s experience (if any) in dealing with construction hazards or high risk activities;\n    (b) evidence of the commitment of the applicant’s senior management to having and implementing appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices;\n    (c) evidence of the applicant’s work practices in relation to the applicant’s building contractors and the applicant’s building sites;\n    (d) evidence that the applicant integrates safe design principles into the risk management process;\n    (e) evidence that the applicant has mechanisms for effective consultation and communication of WHS issues across an entire project;\n    (f) evidence of the applicant’s capability to collect and analyse information about, and report on, WHS performance across an entire project;\n    (g) evidence that the applicant ensures that workers at all levels on a project are suitably trained and competent to deal with WHS risks associated with the project;\n    (h) a written declaration that the applicant is complying and will comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials.\n  (2) However, evidence of a matter mentioned in subsection (1) need not accompany the application if the application:\n    (a) identifies documents that contain or constitute evidence of the matter, and that will be available for the purposes of a pre-accreditation‑ audit of the applicant; and\n    (b) specifies the location of the documents.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner may waive a requirement to provide evidence in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection (1), or a statement under subsection (2) in relation to such a matter, if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) the Commissioner is satisfied that the applicant has previously provided sufficient information in relation to that matter.\n\n#### 11 Further information\n\n  (1) For the purposes of making a decision under subsection 8(1), the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by notice in writing, request further information from the applicant.\n  (2) The notice must set out:\n    (a) the information sought; and\n    (b) the day by which the information is to be provided to the Federal Safety Commissioner.\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner is not required to consider an application while waiting for the information to be provided.\n  (4) If the information is not provided on or before the day specified in the notice, the application is taken to have been withdrawn.\n\n### Division 4—Pre-accreditation audits\n\n#### 12 Pre-accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 8(1)(b), an applicant for accreditation must:\n    (a) agree to an audit (a pre‑accreditation audit) being carried out under this section for the purpose of the Federal Safety Commissioner determining whether the applicant has, and is implementing and will implement, appropriate WHS policies and procedures and safe work practices; and\n    (b) if the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity—agree with the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the pre‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (2) If the applicant is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an applicant for accreditation meets the accreditation requirements.\n\n  (3) If the applicant is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to:\n    (a) carry out the audit in accordance with the agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(b); and\n    (b) if an activity involved in the audit is to occur on particular premises—carry out the activity on the premises only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n#### 13 Pre‑accreditation audit unnecessary in certain circumstances\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) the applicant is, or has been, an accredited person; and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit of the applicant has been carried out; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without carrying out a pre‑accreditation audit, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n  (2) Also, the Federal Safety Commissioner may accredit an applicant under section 8 without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant having been carried out if:\n    (a) another person that is an accredited person has been subject to a pre‑accreditation audit or a post‑accreditation audit; and\n    (b) at the time the applicant made the application, the other person’s WHSMS and the applicant’s WHSMS were the same; and\n    (c) the Commissioner considers that it is appropriate to accredit the applicant without a pre‑accreditation audit of the applicant, having regard to:\n    (i) the findings of the audit mentioned in paragraph (a); and\n    (ii) any other matters that the Commissioner considers relevant.\n\n> Note: An applicant for accreditation must agree to a pre‑accreditation audit being carried out even if there is a possibility that the Federal Safety Commissioner will accredit the applicant relying on this section (see paragraph 8(1)(b)).\n\n### Division 5—Notice of decision\n\n#### 14 Notice of decision\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give an applicant for accreditation written notice of:\n    (a) a decision under section 8 to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) a decision under section 8 to refuse to accredit the applicant.\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must give the notice as soon as practicable after making the decision.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner accredits the applicant, the notice must set out the following:\n    (a) the day on which the accreditation begins;\n    (b) the period of the accreditation;\n    (c) the conditions that apply to the accreditation under section 15;\n    (d) any further conditions imposed under section 16, together with the reasons for imposing the conditions.\n  (4) If the Federal Safety Commissioner:\n    (a) refuses to accredit the applicant; or\n    (b) accredits the applicant for a period of less than 6 years; or\n    (c) imposes further conditions under section 16;\n  the notice must include a statement of the applicant’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 6—Conditions of accreditation\n\n#### 15 Conditions that apply to all accreditations\n\n  (1) The following conditions apply to all accreditations:\n    (a) the accredited person must at all times have and implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures, and safe work practices;\n    (b) the accredited person must comply with the performance requirements of the National Construction Code that relate to building materials;\n    (c) the accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out;\n    (d) the accredited person must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the post‑accreditation audits;\n    (e) the accredited person must comply with the reporting requirements notified to the person under subsection (2) from time to time.\n\n> Note: Further conditions may be imposed under section 16 or paragraph 18(1)(a).\n\n  (2) The Federal Safety Commissioner must notify the person in writing of the reporting requirements that the person must comply with.\n\n#### 16 Federal Safety Commissioner may impose further conditions\n\n  (1) The Federal Safety Commissioner may impose a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person:\n    (a) at the time the accreditation is given; or\n    (b) during the period of the accreditation.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation during the period of the accreditation, the Commissioner must give the accredited person a written notice:\n    (a) setting out the condition; and\n    (b) setting out the reason for imposing the condition; and\n    (c) including a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n> Note: For conditions imposed at the time an accreditation is given, these matters must be set out in the notice of accreditation (see subsections 14(3) and (4)).\n\n#### 17 Post‑accreditation audit\n\n  (1) For the purposes of paragraph 15(1)(c), an accredited person must agree to post‑accreditation audits being carried out under this section.\n  Audits of constitutional corporations, the Commonwealth and corporate Commonwealth entities\n  (2) If the accredited person is a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, a Federal Safety Officer is to carry out the audit exercising powers under Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7 of the Act.\n\n> Note: That Division gives an officer certain powers for the purpose of ascertaining whether a constitutional corporation, the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity that is an accredited person has complied, or is complying, with conditions of the accreditation.\n\n  Audits of other accredited persons\n  (3) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with an agreement between the accredited person and the Federal Safety Commissioner on the way in which the post‑accreditation audit will be carried out.\n  (4) A Federal Safety Officer is to carry out on particular premises an activity involved in a post‑accreditation audit of an accredited person who is neither a constitutional corporation nor the Commonwealth nor a corporate Commonwealth entity only with the consent of the occupier of the premises.\n\n### Division 7—Breach of conditions etc.\n\n#### 18 Breach of conditions\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner is satisfied that an accredited person has breached a condition of accreditation, the Commissioner may do any or all of the following in respect of the breach:\n    (a) impose a further condition of accreditation;\n    (b) suspend the person’s accreditation;\n    (c) revoke the person’s accreditation, if the Commissioner is satisfied that:\n    (i) the person has at 2 or more times while accredited failed to have or implement appropriate WHS policies and procedures or safe work practices; or\n    (ii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures constitute a risk to safety; or\n    (iii) the person’s WHS policies and procedures are not being complied with, in a way that constitutes a risk to safety; or\n    (iv) the person’s work practices are not safe.\n  (2) If:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner does a thing mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (b) in respect of a breach (the first breach); and\n    (b) the Commissioner later becomes satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) (in relation to the first breach, in relation to another breach of a condition of accreditation or in relation to both the first breach and another breach of a condition of accreditation);\n  the Commissioner may revoke the person’s accreditation even if the period for complying with any condition or the period of any suspension has not ended.\n  Accredited persons using the same WHSMS\n  (3) Subsection (4) applies if:\n    (a) the Federal Safety Commissioner is considering whether to make a decision under this section in relation to an accredited person (the first person); and\n    (b) a post‑accreditation audit (the relevant audit) of another accredited person has been carried out; and\n    (c) the first person’s WHSMS is the same as the other person’s WHSMS was at the time of the relevant audit.\n  (4) Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), the Federal Safety Commissioner may be satisfied that the first person has breached a condition of accreditation, or be satisfied of a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(c) or (2)(b) in relation to the first person, if the Commissioner considers it appropriate having regard to the findings of the relevant audit.\n\n#### 19 Notices under this Division\n\n  (1) If the Federal Safety Commissioner imposes a further condition of accreditation on an accredited person under paragraph 18(1)(a), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the imposition of the condition.\n  (2) If the Federal Safety Commissioner suspends an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(b), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the suspension, the day that the suspension takes effect and the period of the suspension.\n  (3) If the Federal Safety Commissioner revokes an accredited person’s accreditation under paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection 18(2), the Commissioner must give the person notice in writing of the revocation and the day that the revocation takes effect.\n  (4) A notice under this section must also:\n    (a) set out the reason that the condition was imposed or that the accreditation was suspended or revoked, as the case may be; and\n    (b) include a statement of the person’s review rights under Division 9.\n\n### Division 8—Variation and cancellation of accreditation\n\n#### 20 Variation of accreditation for change of name\n\n  If the name of an accredited person changes, the Federal Safety Commissioner may, by written notice to the person, vary the person’s accreditation to reflect the change.\n\n#### 21 Cancellation of accreditation on request\n\n  The Federal Safety Commissioner may cancel an accredited person’s accreditation if the person gives the Commissioner a request, in writing, for the accreditation to be cancelled.\n\n### Division 9—Review of decisions\n\n#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```\n\n#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.\n\n#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.\n\n#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).\n\n## Part 3—Prescribed building work\n\n#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.\n\n## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions\n\n#### 27 Transitional—things done under repealed instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.\n\n#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":30},{"sectionNumber":"22","sectionType":"section","heading":"Reviewable decisions","content":"#### 22 Reviewable decisions\n\n  The decisions in the following table are reviewable decisions.\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"3\" style=\"border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Reviewable decisions</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Item</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Decision</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableHeading\"><span>Provisions</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>1</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to accredit a person</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:1.5pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>2</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To determine a period of accreditation less than 6 years</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>8(1)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>3</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To impose a condition on an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Subsection</span><span> </span><span>16(1) or paragraph</span><span> </span><span>18(1)(a)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>4</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To suspend an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(b)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>5</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To revoke an accreditation</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Paragraph 18(1)(c) or subsection</span><span> </span><span>18(2)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:10.08%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>6</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>To refuse to cancel an accreditation on request</span></p></td><td style=\"width:44.96%; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:1.5pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"Tabletext\"><span>Section</span><span> </span><span>21</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```","sortOrder":31},{"sectionNumber":"23","sectionType":"section","heading":"Internal review of decisions","content":"#### 23 Internal review of decisions\n\n  Application for review\n  (1) A person whose interests are affected by a reviewable decision may request a reconsideration of the decision.\n  (2) The request must:\n    (a) be given, in writing, to the Federal Safety Commissioner; and\n    (b) set out the reasons for the request; and\n    (c) be made within 28 days after the day the person first received the notice of the reviewable decision.\n  Review of decision\n  (3) The Federal Safety Commissioner must, as soon as practicable after receiving the request, cause the decision to be reviewed by a person (the reviewer) specified in subsection (4).\n  (4) The reviewer must be:\n    (a) if the Federal Safety Commissioner made the decision personally—a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision; or\n    (b) in any other case:\n    (i) the Federal Safety Commissioner personally; or\n    (ii) a delegate of the Commissioner who was not involved in making the decision.\n  (5) The reviewer may:\n    (a) affirm, vary or set aside the reviewable decision; and\n    (b) if the reviewer sets aside the reviewable decision—make such other decision as the reviewer thinks appropriate.\n  (6) The decision on review takes effect:\n    (a) on the day specified in the decision on review; or\n    (b) if a day is not specified—on the day the decision on review is made.\n  (7) The reviewer is taken to have affirmed the reviewable decision if a decision is not made under subsection (5) within 90 days after the request was received.","sortOrder":32},{"sectionNumber":"24","sectionType":"section","heading":"Notice of decision on review","content":"#### 24 Notice of decision on review\n\n  (1) The reviewer of a decision under section 23 must, within 28 days after making the decision on review, give a person whose interests are affected by the decision on review written notice:\n    (a) of the decision on review; and\n    (b) of the person’s review rights under section 25.\n  (2) A failure to comply with subsection (1) does not affect the validity of the decision on review.","sortOrder":33},{"sectionNumber":"25","sectionType":"section","heading":"AAT review","content":"#### 25 AAT review\n\n  Applications may be made to the AAT for review of decisions of a reviewer under subsection 23(5).","sortOrder":34},{"sectionNumber":"Part 3","sectionType":"part","heading":"Prescribed building work","content":"## Part 3—Prescribed building work","sortOrder":35},{"sectionNumber":"26","sectionType":"section","heading":"Prescribed building work","content":"#### 26 Prescribed building work\n\n  For the purposes of subsection 43(4) of the Act, the following building work is prescribed:\n    (a) building work carried out outside Australia;\n    (b) building work that:\n    (i) is carried out under a contract with a value of less than $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) forms part of a project that is directly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity;\n    (c) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $6,000,000, and represents at least 50% of the total funding;\n    (d) building work that forms part of a project that is indirectly funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity, unless:\n    (i) the building work is carried out under a contract with a value of at least $4,000,000; and\n    (ii) the contribution made to the funding of the project by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity is at least $10,000,000;\n    (e) building work for which both of the following conditions are met:\n    (i) the building work forms part of a project to support the operations of an intelligence or security agency;\n    (ii) a Minister, who administers the provision of the Act under which the agency exists or the Department that the agency forms part of, has determined in writing that disclosing the connection of the Commonwealth with the work or project would prejudice security;\n    (f) building work carried out by a subcontractor;\n    (g) building work that forms part of a project and is carried out in the following circumstances:\n    (i) the project is undertaken by a joint venture;\n    (ii) the building work is carried out, in whole or in part, by a builder who is not an accredited person;\n    (iii) an accredited person in the joint venture (the accredited member) has given an undertaking, in writing, to take full responsibility for WHS for the life of the project;\n    (iv) the accredited member has given an undertaking, in writing, that the building work will be carried out in accordance with its WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (v) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work, in whole or in part, has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will carry out the building work in accordance with the accredited member’s WHSMS for the life of the project;\n    (vi) each builder who is not the accredited member and who carries out the building work has given an undertaking, in writing, that the builder will participate fully in any audit of the accredited member’s WHSMS and the way in which it is implemented on‑site;\n    (vii) before a person enters into a contract for building work in relation to the project on behalf of the joint venture, the person gives the Federal Safety Commissioner copies of the undertakings;\n    (h) any work that is part of a project for:\n    (i) the construction, repair or restoration of a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (ii) the construction, repair or restoration of any building, structure or work associated with a single‑dwelling house; or\n    (iii) the alteration or extension of a single‑dwelling house, if it remains a single‑dwelling house after the alteration or extension;\n    (i) the prefabrication of made‑to‑order components to form part of any building, structure or works, that is carried out at a place that is not:\n    (i) the site (the main site) where the construction, alteration, extension, restoration, repair of, or the installation of fittings in, the building, structure or works occurs or is to occur; or\n    (ii) a site that is separate from the main site and is either merely auxiliary to the main site or merely a holding site for components of the building, structure or works;\n    (j) building work described in paragraph 6(1)(e) of the Act.","sortOrder":36},{"sectionNumber":"Part 4","sectionType":"part","heading":"Application, savings and transitional provisions","content":"## Part 4—Application, savings and transitional provisions","sortOrder":37},{"sectionNumber":"27","sectionType":"section","heading":"Transitional—things done under repealed instruments","content":"#### 27 Transitional—things done under [Repealed] instruments\n\n  (1) If:\n    (a) a thing was done, or had effect as if it had been done, for a particular purpose under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 (the old rules) before the commencement of this instrument; and\n    (b) the thing could be done for that purpose under this instrument;\n  the thing has effect for the purposes of this instrument as if it had been done under this instrument.\n\n> Note 1: Under item 11 of Schedule 2 to the Building and Construction Industry (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Act 2016, the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 continued in force from the start of 2 December 2016 as if it were rules made for the purposes of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (now renamed the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022).\n\n> Note 2: Section 28 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 provided that certain things done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 had effect as if they had been done under the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016.\n\n  (2) Without limiting subsection (1), a reference in that subsection to a thing being done includes a reference to an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument being given or made.\n\n> Note: For example, an accreditation that was given, or had effect as if it had been given, under the old rules before the commencement of this instrument continues to have effect (until the end of the period of accreditation, or until the accreditation is cancelled or revoked) as if it were an accreditation given under this instrument.\n\n  (3) Nothing in this section prevents the variation, revocation or cancellation of an accreditation, notice, application or other instrument on or after the commencement of this section.","sortOrder":38},{"sectionNumber":"28","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014","content":"#### 28 Application of provisions reflecting amendments made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014\n\n  (1) The condition in paragraph 15(1)(c) does not apply to an accredited person in relation to a period of accreditation that started before 1 January 2015.\n  (2) Despite the repeal of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 and the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016, for building work carried out under a contract entered into before 1 January 2015:\n    (a) regulation 24 of the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005, as in force immediately before the commencement of items 12 to 16 of Schedule 1 to the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014, continues to apply; and\n    (b) section 26 of this instrument does not apply.\n\n> Note: The application provisions in this section relate to amendments of the repealed Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulations 2005 made by the Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Amendment Regulation 2014. The items mentioned in paragraph (2)(a) of this section commenced on 1 January 2015.","sortOrder":39}],"analysis":{"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"This instrument mainly restates and relocates the pre‑existing Fair Work/Building Industry accreditation rules under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 framework and carries earlier accreditations and saving rules forward (see transitional ss27–28). The core scope — making accreditation a condition for carrying out certain Commonwealth‑funded building work and prescribing audit, reporting and enforcement mechanisms — remains consistent with the prior accreditation scheme. The instrument refines administrative detail (audit regimes, evidence options, joint venture undertakings and funding thresholds) but does not materially expand the scheme beyond its original purpose of conditioning Commonwealth construction procurement on accredited WHS systems (see ss6, 8, 15 and 26)."},"complexity_factors":["Approximately 15 expressly defined or referenced terms in the instrument’s interpretation material (s5 and notes).","Multiple cross‑references to the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 (including subsection 43 and Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 7) that import external powers and definitions.","Two distinct audit regimes (constitutional corporations / Commonwealth / corporate Commonwealth entities vs other applicants) with differing powers and consent requirements (ss12(2)–(3), 17(2)–(4)).","Nested conditional exceptions in the \"prescribed building work\" list (s26) — 10 main items with sub‑conditions, including multi‑factor funding thresholds ($4M, $6M, $10M) and joint venture undertakings (s26(b)–(g)).","Multiple discretionary decision points for the Commissioner (may accredit, may waive evidence, may impose conditions, may suspend/revoke) with varying notice/review obligations (ss8, 10(3), 13, 16, 18, 19).","Internal review path plus AAT external review — procedural timelines and default outcomes if not determined within set periods (ss23–25).","Transitional and savings provisions carrying over previous regulations and exceptions (ss27–28) — requires reading prior instruments to understand continuity.","Repeated material and structural duplication in the text (the instrument reprints the same Parts/Divisions many times), which raises practical reading difficulty though not substantive novelty.","Varied documentary and evidentiary options (immediate evidence, identifying documentary locations, or Commissioner waiver) creating multiple application pathways (s10(1)–(3), s11).","Specific carve‑ins for subcontractors and joint venture arrangements that extend obligations down supply chains and create coordination requirements (s26(f)–(g))."],"plain_english_summary":"**What this instrument does (mechanically)\n\n- It establishes an accreditation scheme under the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022 for organisations that want to do building work funded by the Commonwealth or a corporate Commonwealth entity (see s6 and s7).\n- It sets out how to apply (s9), what evidence must accompany an application (s10), and the Commissioner’s decision criteria (s8(3)–(4)).\n- It requires a pre‑accreditation audit in most cases and describes when that can be avoided (ss12–13). Separate audit procedures apply depending on whether the applicant is a constitutional corporation/the Commonwealth/corporate Commonwealth entity, or another body (ss12, 17).\n- It fixes the maximum accreditation term (up to 6 years) and allows the Commissioner to impose conditions, require reporting, carry out post‑accreditation audits, and take enforcement action (s8(2), ss15–18).\n- It lists categories of \"prescribed building work\" that are within or outside the scheme (for example: work outside Australia; contracts under $4,000,000; certain indirect funding thresholds; subcontractor work; joint venture arrangements; prefabrication sites; single‑dwelling house work) (s26).\n- It provides internal review and Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) rights for certain decisions (ss22–25) and transitional savings that carry accreditations and other acts forward from the previous regulations (ss27–28).\n\nWho it affects\n\n- Primary: companies and entities (including constitutional corporations and corporate Commonwealth entities) that wish to carry out Commonwealth‑funded building work that falls within the prescribed categories.\n- Secondary: subcontractors, joint venture partners, project owners and procuring Commonwealth agencies that must check accreditation status and supply documentation; occupiers of premises where audits occur (their consent is needed for certain on‑site activities) (ss12(3)(b), 17(4)).\n\nWhy it matters (official purpose and practical effects)\n\n- The instrument’s stated purpose is to prescribe an accreditation regime to ensure appropriate work health and safety (WHS) management on Commonwealth‑funded building projects (s6; conditions in s15).\n- Mechanically, it requires applicants to hold and implement a work health and safety management system (WHSMS), to submit evidence or make documents available for audit, to accept audits, and to comply with performance requirements of the National Construction Code relating to building materials (ss8(1)(c)–(d), 10(1)(a)–(h), 15(1)(a)–(b)).\n\nCosts, incentives, trade‑offs, and implementation considerations (testing the purpose claim)\n\n- Who pays: applicants and accredited persons bear the direct compliance costs — preparing WHSMS documentation, producing evidence, facilitating and responding to pre‑ and post‑accreditation audits, and ongoing reporting required by the Commissioner (ss10, 11, 15(1)(e), 17). Indirectly, project procurement teams and subcontractors may incur administrative costs when the Commonwealth requires accredited builders for certain work (s26).\n- Who decides: the Federal Safety Commissioner has broad discretion to accredit, refuse, impose conditions, suspend or revoke accreditation, and to decide whether a pre‑accreditation audit is necessary (ss7–8, 13, 16, 18). Those decisions are subject to internal review and AAT review for specified categories (ss22–25).\n- Behaviour changed: to win or keep Commonwealth work that falls inside the scheme, firms will need to maintain a WHSMS aligned with the Commissioner’s focus points (senior management commitment, subcontractor WHS management, safe‑design integration, whole‑of‑project consultation and performance measurement, and WHS training — s8(4)). Subcontractors are specifically brought within the scheme’s net (s26(f)), which pushes WHS obligations down the supply chain.\n- Compliance burden: applicants must gather/produce a broad set of documents and accept audits on and off sites (ss10–12, 17). Smaller contracts below the specified financial thresholds are excluded (s26(b)), but where Commonwealth funding is indirect the thresholds and percentage tests (s26(c)–(d)) add complexity for determining coverage.\n- Discretion and legal risk: the Commissioner’s powers to impose further conditions during an accreditation period and to revoke on safety grounds (s16, s18) create enforcement reach but also leave room for administrative discretion. The instrument limits this by providing internal review and AAT review rights for key decisions (ss23–25), but a decision‑maker’s factual assessments (for example, that policies \"constitute a risk to safety\" — s18(1)(c)(ii)) will be influential.\n- Concentrated benefits and diffuse costs: accreditation can be a commercial advantage for firms competing for large Commonwealth contracts (concentrated benefit). Compliance costs — document preparation, audits, training — are more widely borne by bidders and subcontractors (diffuse cost). The thresholds ($4,000,000 contract value; $6,000,000 or $10,000,000 funding tests) concentrate the scheme’s binding effect on larger projects (s26(b)–(d)).\n- Substitution effects: where accreditation is required and costly, procuring bodies or firms might restructure contracts (use multiple smaller contracts, or change funding arrangements) or substitute suppliers to avoid obligations — the rules attempt to anticipate this by addressing indirect funding and joint venture arrangements (s26(c)–(d), (g)).\n- Implementation risk: effective operation requires administrative capacity to run audits and assess WHSMSs consistently. The instrument distinguishes audit powers depending on corporate status (ss12(2), 17(2)), and requires occupier consent for on‑site activities for non‑constitutional entities (ss12(3)(b), 17(4)), which adds procedural steps.\n\nConcrete legal hooks (key sections to read)\n\n- Accrediting authority and scheme: ss6–7\n- Decision to accredit; criteria and term: s8 (and s8(2) for 6‑year cap)\n- Application and evidence: ss9–11\n- Pre‑ and post‑accreditation audits: ss12–13 and s17\n- Conditions and reporting: ss15–16\n- Breach, suspension, revocation: s18 and notices rules s19\n- Variation/cancellation: ss20–21\n- Review rights: ss22–25\n- Prescribed building work (scope/exclusions and thresholds): s26\n- Transitional savings from previous rules: ss27–28\n\nIn short: the Rules operationalise a Commonwealth accreditation regime. They impose documentation, audit and ongoing reporting obligations on firms that want to carry out certain Commonwealth‑funded work; give the Federal Safety Commissioner broad decision and enforcement powers; and preserve review rights while keeping the scheme targeted at larger, higher‑risk projects by using financial and project‑type thresholds (s26)."},"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"},"kimi_summary":{"_metrics":{"completionTokens":837},"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The legislation appears to be a straightforward re-enactment of the previous Fair Work (Building Industry—Accreditation Scheme) Regulation 2016 under the renamed Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022. The scope remains focused on WHS accreditation for Commonwealth-funded building work, with similar exemptions, conditions, and audit requirements. Transitional provisions explicitly preserve existing accreditations and arrangements."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple nested conditional exemptions in section 26 (prescribed building work) with overlapping monetary thresholds ($4M, $6M, $10M) and percentage tests (50%)","Cross-references to the Federal Safety Commissioner Act 2022, National Construction Code, Crimes Act 1914, and ASIO Act 1979","Defined terms that reference other defined terms (e.g., 'joint venture' with two-part definition, 'reviewable decision' pointing to section 22 table)","Two-tiered review system (internal review then AAT) with specific timing rules (28 days to request, 90 days deemed affirmation)","Audit provisions with different rules for constitutional corporations vs other entities (consent requirements for premises)","Transitional provisions preserving accreditations and conditions from three layers of repealed instruments (2005, 2014, 2016 regulations)","Multiple conditions of accreditation with further conditions possible at any time, plus breach escalation pathways"],"plain_english_summary":"The bill creates a federal Work Health and Safety Accreditation Scheme: companies must be accredited by the Federal Safety Commissioner to bid on Commonwealth‑funded building work. Accreditation requires a WHS management system, senior commitment, safe design and subcontractor management, audits, and compliance with the National Construction Code; it lasts up to six years and can be conditioned, suspended, or revoked. It mainly affects builders, joint ventures and subcontractors (with exemptions for small, overseas, single‑house, security, and offsite prefab work) and preserves review rights."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/federal-safety-commissioner-accreditation-scheme-rules-2023","history":"/api/acts/federal-safety-commissioner-accreditation-scheme-rules-2023/history","analysis":"/api/acts/federal-safety-commissioner-accreditation-scheme-rules-2023/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/federal-safety-commissioner-accreditation-scheme-rules-2023/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/federal-safety-commissioner-accreditation-scheme-rules-2023/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/federal-safety-commissioner-accreditation-scheme-rules-2023/documents"}}