{"id":"qld:act-2014-008","name":"Fair Trading Inspectors Act 2014","slug":"fair-trading-inspectors-act-2014","collection":"act","jurisdiction":"qld","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"8 of 2014","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":29676,"registerId":"qld-act-2014-008-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-01","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.1","sectionType":"part","heading":"General provisions about inspectors","content":"# General provisions about inspectors","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.1-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Functions","content":"## Functions","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"sec.12","sectionType":"section","heading":"Functions of inspectors","content":"### sec.12 Functions of inspectors\n\nFor this Act or a primary Act, an inspector has the following functions—\nto investigate, monitor and enforce compliance with this Act or the primary Act;\nto investigate or monitor whether an occasion has arisen for the exercise of powers under this Act or the primary Act;\nto facilitate the exercise of powers under this Act or the primary Act.\nSubject to this Act, an inspector may exercise the powers under this Act for the purpose of these functions.\nSubject to the modifying provisions for the following Acts and any provisions of the primary Act, the functions are in addition to and do not limit any functions the inspector has under the primary Act—\nAssociations Incorporation Act 1981 ;\nManufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 ;\nProperty Occupations Act 2014 ;\nResidential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 ;\nRetirement Villages Act 1999 ;\nTourism Services Act 2003 .\nIt is unnecessary for the inspector to hold a separate appointment for this Act.\ns 12 amd 2014 No. 30 s 63 sch 1 ; 2020 No. 17 s 64\n(sec.12-ssec.1) For this Act or a primary Act, an inspector has the following functions— to investigate, monitor and enforce compliance with this Act or the primary Act; to investigate or monitor whether an occasion has arisen for the exercise of powers under this Act or the primary Act; to facilitate the exercise of powers under this Act or the primary Act.\n(sec.12-ssec.2) Subject to this Act, an inspector may exercise the powers under this Act for the purpose of these functions.\n(sec.12-ssec.3) Subject to the modifying provisions for the following Acts and any provisions of the primary Act, the functions are in addition to and do not limit any functions the inspector has under the primary Act— Associations Incorporation Act 1981 ; Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 ; Property Occupations Act 2014 ; Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 ; Retirement Villages Act 1999 ; Tourism Services Act 2003 .\n(sec.12-ssec.4) It is unnecessary for the inspector to hold a separate appointment for this Act.\n- (a) to investigate, monitor and enforce compliance with this Act or the primary Act;\n- (b) to investigate or monitor whether an occasion has arisen for the exercise of powers under this Act or the primary Act;\n- (c) to facilitate the exercise of powers under this Act or the primary Act.\n- (a) Associations Incorporation Act 1981 ;\n- (b) Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 ;\n- (c) Property Occupations Act 2014 ;\n- (d) Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 ;\n- (e) Retirement Villages Act 1999 ;\n- (f) Tourism Services Act 2003 .","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.1-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Appointment","content":"## Appointment","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"sec.13","sectionType":"section","heading":"Appointment and qualifications","content":"### sec.13 Appointment and qualifications\n\nThe chief executive may, by instrument in writing, appoint any of the following persons as an inspector for a primary Act—\na public service employee;\na person prescribed by the primary Act;\na person prescribed under a regulation.\nHowever, the chief executive may appoint a person as an inspector only if the chief executive is satisfied the person is qualified for appointment because the person has the necessary expertise or experience.\nThe instrument must state the primary Act for which the person is appointed as an inspector.\nA person may be appointed as an inspector for more than 1 primary Act.\n(sec.13-ssec.1) The chief executive may, by instrument in writing, appoint any of the following persons as an inspector for a primary Act— a public service employee; a person prescribed by the primary Act; a person prescribed under a regulation.\n(sec.13-ssec.2) However, the chief executive may appoint a person as an inspector only if the chief executive is satisfied the person is qualified for appointment because the person has the necessary expertise or experience.\n(sec.13-ssec.3) The instrument must state the primary Act for which the person is appointed as an inspector.\n(sec.13-ssec.4) A person may be appointed as an inspector for more than 1 primary Act.\n- (a) a public service employee;\n- (b) a person prescribed by the primary Act;\n- (c) a person prescribed under a regulation.","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"sec.14","sectionType":"section","heading":"Appointment conditions and limit on powers","content":"### sec.14 Appointment conditions and limit on powers\n\nAn inspector holds office on any conditions stated in—\nthe inspector’s instrument of appointment; or\na signed notice given to the inspector; or\na regulation.\nThe instrument of appointment, a signed notice given to the inspector or a regulation may limit the inspector’s powers.\nIn this section—\nsigned notice means a notice signed by the chief executive.\n(sec.14-ssec.1) An inspector holds office on any conditions stated in— the inspector’s instrument of appointment; or a signed notice given to the inspector; or a regulation.\n(sec.14-ssec.2) The instrument of appointment, a signed notice given to the inspector or a regulation may limit the inspector’s powers.\n(sec.14-ssec.3) In this section— signed notice means a notice signed by the chief executive.\n- (a) the inspector’s instrument of appointment; or\n- (b) a signed notice given to the inspector; or\n- (c) a regulation.","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"sec.15","sectionType":"section","heading":"When office ends","content":"### sec.15 When office ends\n\nThe office of a person as an inspector ends if any of the following happens—\nthe term of office stated in a condition of office ends;\nunder another condition of office, the office ends;\nthe inspector’s resignation under section 16 takes effect.\nSubsection (1) does not limit the ways the office of a person as an inspector ends.\nIn this section—\ncondition of office means a condition under which the inspector holds office.\n(sec.15-ssec.1) The office of a person as an inspector ends if any of the following happens— the term of office stated in a condition of office ends; under another condition of office, the office ends; the inspector’s resignation under section 16 takes effect.\n(sec.15-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not limit the ways the office of a person as an inspector ends.\n(sec.15-ssec.3) In this section— condition of office means a condition under which the inspector holds office.\n- (a) the term of office stated in a condition of office ends;\n- (b) under another condition of office, the office ends;\n- (c) the inspector’s resignation under section 16 takes effect.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"sec.16","sectionType":"section","heading":"Resignation","content":"### sec.16 Resignation\n\nAn inspector may resign by signed notice given to the chief executive.\nHowever, if holding office as an inspector is a condition of the inspector holding another office, the inspector may not resign as an inspector without resigning from the other office.\n(sec.16-ssec.1) An inspector may resign by signed notice given to the chief executive.\n(sec.16-ssec.2) However, if holding office as an inspector is a condition of the inspector holding another office, the inspector may not resign as an inspector without resigning from the other office.","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.1-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Identity cards","content":"## Identity cards","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"sec.17","sectionType":"section","heading":"Issue of identity card","content":"### sec.17 Issue of identity card\n\nThe chief executive must issue an identity card to each inspector.\nThe identity card must—\ncontain a recent photo of the inspector; and\ncontain a copy of the inspector’s signature; and\nidentify the person as an inspector appointed under this Act for a primary Act; and\nidentify the primary Act for which the person is appointed; and\nstate an expiry date for the card.\nThis section does not prevent the issue of a single identity card to a person for this Act and other purposes.\n(sec.17-ssec.1) The chief executive must issue an identity card to each inspector.\n(sec.17-ssec.2) The identity card must— contain a recent photo of the inspector; and contain a copy of the inspector’s signature; and identify the person as an inspector appointed under this Act for a primary Act; and identify the primary Act for which the person is appointed; and state an expiry date for the card.\n(sec.17-ssec.3) This section does not prevent the issue of a single identity card to a person for this Act and other purposes.\n- (a) contain a recent photo of the inspector; and\n- (b) contain a copy of the inspector’s signature; and\n- (c) identify the person as an inspector appointed under this Act for a primary Act; and\n- (d) identify the primary Act for which the person is appointed; and\n- (e) state an expiry date for the card.","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"sec.18","sectionType":"section","heading":"Production or display of identity card","content":"### sec.18 Production or display of identity card\n\nIn exercising a power in relation to a person in the person’s presence, an inspector must—\nproduce the inspector’s identity card for the person’s inspection before exercising the power; or\nhave the identity card displayed so it is clearly visible to the person when exercising the power.\nHowever, if it is not practicable to comply with subsection (1) , the inspector must produce the identity card for the person’s inspection at the first reasonable opportunity.\nFor subsection (1) , an inspector does not exercise a power in relation to a person only because the inspector has entered a place as mentioned in section 22 (1) (b) or (d) .\n(sec.18-ssec.1) In exercising a power in relation to a person in the person’s presence, an inspector must— produce the inspector’s identity card for the person’s inspection before exercising the power; or have the identity card displayed so it is clearly visible to the person when exercising the power.\n(sec.18-ssec.2) However, if it is not practicable to comply with subsection (1) , the inspector must produce the identity card for the person’s inspection at the first reasonable opportunity.\n(sec.18-ssec.3) For subsection (1) , an inspector does not exercise a power in relation to a person only because the inspector has entered a place as mentioned in section 22 (1) (b) or (d) .\n- (a) produce the inspector’s identity card for the person’s inspection before exercising the power; or\n- (b) have the identity card displayed so it is clearly visible to the person when exercising the power.","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"sec.19","sectionType":"section","heading":"Return of identity card","content":"### sec.19 Return of identity card\n\nIf the office of a person as an inspector ends, the person must return the person’s identity card to the chief executive within 21 days after the office ends unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—20 penalty units.","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.1-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Miscellaneous provisions","content":"## Miscellaneous provisions","sortOrder":12},{"sectionNumber":"sec.20","sectionType":"section","heading":"References to exercise of powers","content":"### sec.20 References to exercise of powers\n\nIf—\na provision of this chapter refers to the exercise of a power by an inspector; and\nthere is no reference to a specific power;\nthe reference is to the exercise of all or any inspectors’ powers under this chapter or a warrant, to the extent the powers are relevant.\n- (a) a provision of this chapter refers to the exercise of a power by an inspector; and\n- (b) there is no reference to a specific power;","sortOrder":13},{"sectionNumber":"sec.21","sectionType":"section","heading":"Reference to document includes reference to reproductions from electronic document","content":"### sec.21 Reference to document includes reference to reproductions from electronic document\n\nA reference in this chapter to a document includes a reference to an image or writing—\nproduced from an electronic document; or\nnot yet produced, but reasonably capable of being produced, from an electronic document, with or without the aid of another article or device.\n- (a) produced from an electronic document; or\n- (b) not yet produced, but reasonably capable of being produced, from an electronic document, with or without the aid of another article or device.","sortOrder":14},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.2","sectionType":"part","heading":"Entry to places by inspectors","content":"# Entry to places by inspectors","sortOrder":15},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.2-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Power to enter","content":"## Power to enter","sortOrder":16},{"sectionNumber":"sec.22","sectionType":"section","heading":"General power to enter places","content":"### sec.22 General power to enter places\n\nAn inspector may enter a place if—\nan occupier of the place consents under division 2 to the entry and section 25 has been complied with for the occupier; or\nit is a public place and the entry is made when it is open to the public; or\nthe entry is authorised under a warrant and, if there is an occupier of the place, section 32 has been complied with for the occupier; or\nit is a place of business that is regulated under a primary Act and is—\nopen for carrying on the business; or\notherwise open for entry; or\nrequired to be open for inspection under the primary Act.\nFor subsection (1) (d) , a place of business does not include a part of the place where a person resides.\nIf the power to enter arose only because an occupier of the place consented to the entry, the power is subject to any conditions of the consent and ceases if the consent is withdrawn.\nIf the power to enter is under a warrant, the power is subject to the terms of the warrant.\nThe consent may provide consent for re-entry and is subject to the conditions of consent.\nIf the power to re-enter is under a warrant, the re-entry is subject to the terms of the warrant.\nFor this section, a place of business is regulated under a primary Act if—\nthe person who carries on business at the place holds, or is required to hold, an authority under the primary Act to carry on the business; or\nthe place of business is, or is required to be, mentioned in an authority under the primary Act.\nIn this section—\nauthority , under a primary Act, means a licence, registration, permit or other authority, however called, issued under the primary Act.\n(sec.22-ssec.1) An inspector may enter a place if— an occupier of the place consents under division 2 to the entry and section 25 has been complied with for the occupier; or it is a public place and the entry is made when it is open to the public; or the entry is authorised under a warrant and, if there is an occupier of the place, section 32 has been complied with for the occupier; or it is a place of business that is regulated under a primary Act and is— open for carrying on the business; or otherwise open for entry; or required to be open for inspection under the primary Act.\n(sec.22-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (d) , a place of business does not include a part of the place where a person resides.\n(sec.22-ssec.3) If the power to enter arose only because an occupier of the place consented to the entry, the power is subject to any conditions of the consent and ceases if the consent is withdrawn.\n(sec.22-ssec.4) If the power to enter is under a warrant, the power is subject to the terms of the warrant.\n(sec.22-ssec.5) The consent may provide consent for re-entry and is subject to the conditions of consent.\n(sec.22-ssec.6) If the power to re-enter is under a warrant, the re-entry is subject to the terms of the warrant.\n(sec.22-ssec.7) For this section, a place of business is regulated under a primary Act if— the person who carries on business at the place holds, or is required to hold, an authority under the primary Act to carry on the business; or the place of business is, or is required to be, mentioned in an authority under the primary Act.\n(sec.22-ssec.8) In this section— authority , under a primary Act, means a licence, registration, permit or other authority, however called, issued under the primary Act.\n- (a) an occupier of the place consents under division 2 to the entry and section 25 has been complied with for the occupier; or\n- (b) it is a public place and the entry is made when it is open to the public; or\n- (c) the entry is authorised under a warrant and, if there is an occupier of the place, section 32 has been complied with for the occupier; or\n- (d) it is a place of business that is regulated under a primary Act and is— (i) open for carrying on the business; or (ii) otherwise open for entry; or (iii) required to be open for inspection under the primary Act.\n- (i) open for carrying on the business; or\n- (ii) otherwise open for entry; or\n- (iii) required to be open for inspection under the primary Act.\n- (i) open for carrying on the business; or\n- (ii) otherwise open for entry; or\n- (iii) required to be open for inspection under the primary Act.\n- (a) the person who carries on business at the place holds, or is required to hold, an authority under the primary Act to carry on the business; or\n- (b) the place of business is, or is required to be, mentioned in an authority under the primary Act.","sortOrder":17},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.2-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Entry by consent","content":"## Entry by consent","sortOrder":18},{"sectionNumber":"sec.23","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of div 2","content":"### sec.23 Application of div 2\n\nThis division applies if an inspector intends to ask an occupier of a place for consent to the inspector or another inspector entering the place under section 22 (1) (a) .","sortOrder":19},{"sectionNumber":"sec.24","sectionType":"section","heading":"Incidental entry to ask for access","content":"### sec.24 Incidental entry to ask for access\n\nFor the purpose of asking the occupier for the consent, the inspector may, without the occupier’s consent or a warrant—\nenter land around premises at the place to an extent that is reasonable to contact the occupier; or\nenter part of the place the inspector reasonably considers members of the public ordinarily are allowed to enter when they wish to contact an occupier of the place.\n- (a) enter land around premises at the place to an extent that is reasonable to contact the occupier; or\n- (b) enter part of the place the inspector reasonably considers members of the public ordinarily are allowed to enter when they wish to contact an occupier of the place.","sortOrder":20},{"sectionNumber":"sec.25","sectionType":"section","heading":"Matters inspector must tell occupier","content":"### sec.25 Matters inspector must tell occupier\n\nBefore asking for the consent, the inspector must give a reasonable explanation to the occupier—\nabout the purpose of the entry, including the powers intended to be exercised; and\nthat the occupier is not required to consent; and\nthat the consent may be given subject to conditions and may be withdrawn at any time.\n- (a) about the purpose of the entry, including the powers intended to be exercised; and\n- (b) that the occupier is not required to consent; and\n- (c) that the consent may be given subject to conditions and may be withdrawn at any time.","sortOrder":21},{"sectionNumber":"sec.26","sectionType":"section","heading":"Consent acknowledgement","content":"### sec.26 Consent acknowledgement\n\nIf the consent is given, the inspector may ask the occupier to sign an acknowledgement of the consent.\nThe acknowledgement must state—\nthe purpose of the entry, including the powers to be exercised; and\nthe following has been explained to the occupier—\nthe purpose of the entry, including the powers intended to be exercised;\nthat the occupier is not required to consent;\nthat the consent may be given subject to conditions and may be withdrawn at any time; and\nthe occupier gives the inspector or another inspector consent to enter the place and exercise the powers; and\nthe time and day the consent was given; and\nany conditions of the consent.\nIf the occupier signs the acknowledgement, the inspector must immediately give a copy to the occupier.\nHowever, if it is impractical for the inspector to give the occupier a copy of the acknowledgement immediately, the inspector must give the copy as soon as practicable.\nIf—\nan issue arises in a proceeding about whether the occupier consented to the entry; and\nan acknowledgement complying with subsection (2) for the entry is not produced in evidence;\nthe onus of proof is on the person relying on the lawfulness of the entry to prove the occupier consented.\n(sec.26-ssec.1) If the consent is given, the inspector may ask the occupier to sign an acknowledgement of the consent.\n(sec.26-ssec.2) The acknowledgement must state— the purpose of the entry, including the powers to be exercised; and the following has been explained to the occupier— the purpose of the entry, including the powers intended to be exercised; that the occupier is not required to consent; that the consent may be given subject to conditions and may be withdrawn at any time; and the occupier gives the inspector or another inspector consent to enter the place and exercise the powers; and the time and day the consent was given; and any conditions of the consent.\n(sec.26-ssec.3) If the occupier signs the acknowledgement, the inspector must immediately give a copy to the occupier.\n(sec.26-ssec.4) However, if it is impractical for the inspector to give the occupier a copy of the acknowledgement immediately, the inspector must give the copy as soon as practicable.\n(sec.26-ssec.5) If— an issue arises in a proceeding about whether the occupier consented to the entry; and an acknowledgement complying with subsection (2) for the entry is not produced in evidence; the onus of proof is on the person relying on the lawfulness of the entry to prove the occupier consented.\n- (a) the purpose of the entry, including the powers to be exercised; and\n- (b) the following has been explained to the occupier— (i) the purpose of the entry, including the powers intended to be exercised; (ii) that the occupier is not required to consent; (iii) that the consent may be given subject to conditions and may be withdrawn at any time; and\n- (i) the purpose of the entry, including the powers intended to be exercised;\n- (ii) that the occupier is not required to consent;\n- (iii) that the consent may be given subject to conditions and may be withdrawn at any time; and\n- (c) the occupier gives the inspector or another inspector consent to enter the place and exercise the powers; and\n- (d) the time and day the consent was given; and\n- (e) any conditions of the consent.\n- (i) the purpose of the entry, including the powers intended to be exercised;\n- (ii) that the occupier is not required to consent;\n- (iii) that the consent may be given subject to conditions and may be withdrawn at any time; and\n- (a) an issue arises in a proceeding about whether the occupier consented to the entry; and\n- (b) an acknowledgement complying with subsection (2) for the entry is not produced in evidence;","sortOrder":22},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.2-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Entry under warrant","content":"## Entry under warrant","sortOrder":23},{"sectionNumber":"sec.27","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application for warrant","content":"### sec.27 Application for warrant\n\nAn inspector may apply to a magistrate for a warrant for a place.\nThe inspector must prepare a written application that states the grounds on which the warrant is sought.\nThe written application must be sworn.\nThe magistrate may refuse to consider the application until the inspector gives the magistrate all the information the magistrate requires about the application in the way the magistrate requires.\nThe magistrate may require additional information supporting the written application to be given by statutory declaration.\n(sec.27-ssec.1) An inspector may apply to a magistrate for a warrant for a place.\n(sec.27-ssec.2) The inspector must prepare a written application that states the grounds on which the warrant is sought.\n(sec.27-ssec.3) The written application must be sworn.\n(sec.27-ssec.4) The magistrate may refuse to consider the application until the inspector gives the magistrate all the information the magistrate requires about the application in the way the magistrate requires. The magistrate may require additional information supporting the written application to be given by statutory declaration.","sortOrder":24},{"sectionNumber":"sec.28","sectionType":"section","heading":"Issue of warrant","content":"### sec.28 Issue of warrant\n\nThe magistrate may issue a warrant for the place only under subsection (2) or (3) .\nThe magistrate may issue a warrant for the place if the magistrate is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that there is at the place, or will be at the place within the next 7 days, a particular thing or activity that may provide evidence of an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\nAlso, the magistrate may issue a warrant for the place for the purpose of the inspector’s performance of the function mentioned in section 12 (1) (a) at the place if—\nthe place is a place mentioned in section 22 (1) (b) or (d) ; and\nthe magistrate is satisfied it is reasonably necessary that the inspector should have access to the place for the purpose of effectively performing the function at the place.\nThe magistrate may be satisfied under paragraph (b) if the inspector has made a reasonable attempt to perform the function at the place without a warrant, but because of obstruction has been unsuccessful.\nThe warrant must state—\nthe place to which the warrant applies; and\nthat a stated inspector or any inspector may with necessary and reasonable help and force—\nenter the place and any other place necessary for entry to the place; and\nexercise the inspector’s powers; and\nparticulars of the offence or other circumstances that the magistrate considers appropriate; and\nif the warrant is issued under subsection (2) —the name of the person suspected of having committed the offence unless the name is unknown or the magistrate considers it inappropriate to state the name; and\nthe evidence that may be seized under the warrant; and\nthe hours of the day or night when the place may be entered; and\nthe magistrate’s name; and\nthe day and time of the warrant’s issue; and\nthe day, within 14 days after the warrant’s issue, the warrant ends.\nSubsection (3) does not limit the powers that an inspector can exercise in the absence of a warrant.\n(sec.28-ssec.1) The magistrate may issue a warrant for the place only under subsection (2) or (3) .\n(sec.28-ssec.2) The magistrate may issue a warrant for the place if the magistrate is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that there is at the place, or will be at the place within the next 7 days, a particular thing or activity that may provide evidence of an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\n(sec.28-ssec.3) Also, the magistrate may issue a warrant for the place for the purpose of the inspector’s performance of the function mentioned in section 12 (1) (a) at the place if— the place is a place mentioned in section 22 (1) (b) or (d) ; and the magistrate is satisfied it is reasonably necessary that the inspector should have access to the place for the purpose of effectively performing the function at the place. The magistrate may be satisfied under paragraph (b) if the inspector has made a reasonable attempt to perform the function at the place without a warrant, but because of obstruction has been unsuccessful.\n(sec.28-ssec.4) The warrant must state— the place to which the warrant applies; and that a stated inspector or any inspector may with necessary and reasonable help and force— enter the place and any other place necessary for entry to the place; and exercise the inspector’s powers; and particulars of the offence or other circumstances that the magistrate considers appropriate; and if the warrant is issued under subsection (2) —the name of the person suspected of having committed the offence unless the name is unknown or the magistrate considers it inappropriate to state the name; and the evidence that may be seized under the warrant; and the hours of the day or night when the place may be entered; and the magistrate’s name; and the day and time of the warrant’s issue; and the day, within 14 days after the warrant’s issue, the warrant ends.\n(sec.28-ssec.5) Subsection (3) does not limit the powers that an inspector can exercise in the absence of a warrant.\n- (a) the place is a place mentioned in section 22 (1) (b) or (d) ; and\n- (b) the magistrate is satisfied it is reasonably necessary that the inspector should have access to the place for the purpose of effectively performing the function at the place. Example for paragraph (b) — The magistrate may be satisfied under paragraph (b) if the inspector has made a reasonable attempt to perform the function at the place without a warrant, but because of obstruction has been unsuccessful.\n- (a) the place to which the warrant applies; and\n- (b) that a stated inspector or any inspector may with necessary and reasonable help and force— (i) enter the place and any other place necessary for entry to the place; and (ii) exercise the inspector’s powers; and\n- (i) enter the place and any other place necessary for entry to the place; and\n- (ii) exercise the inspector’s powers; and\n- (c) particulars of the offence or other circumstances that the magistrate considers appropriate; and\n- (d) if the warrant is issued under subsection (2) —the name of the person suspected of having committed the offence unless the name is unknown or the magistrate considers it inappropriate to state the name; and\n- (e) the evidence that may be seized under the warrant; and\n- (f) the hours of the day or night when the place may be entered; and\n- (g) the magistrate’s name; and\n- (h) the day and time of the warrant’s issue; and\n- (i) the day, within 14 days after the warrant’s issue, the warrant ends.\n- (i) enter the place and any other place necessary for entry to the place; and\n- (ii) exercise the inspector’s powers; and","sortOrder":25},{"sectionNumber":"sec.29","sectionType":"section","heading":"Electronic application","content":"### sec.29 Electronic application\n\nAn application under section 27 may be made by phone, fax, email, radio, videoconferencing or another form of electronic communication if the inspector reasonably considers it necessary because of—\nurgent circumstances; or\nother special circumstances, including, for example, the inspector’s remote location.\nThe application—\nmay not be made before the inspector prepares the written application under section 27 (2) ; but\nmay be made before the written application is sworn.\n(sec.29-ssec.1) An application under section 27 may be made by phone, fax, email, radio, videoconferencing or another form of electronic communication if the inspector reasonably considers it necessary because of— urgent circumstances; or other special circumstances, including, for example, the inspector’s remote location.\n(sec.29-ssec.2) The application— may not be made before the inspector prepares the written application under section 27 (2) ; but may be made before the written application is sworn.\n- (a) urgent circumstances; or\n- (b) other special circumstances, including, for example, the inspector’s remote location.\n- (a) may not be made before the inspector prepares the written application under section 27 (2) ; but\n- (b) may be made before the written application is sworn.","sortOrder":26},{"sectionNumber":"sec.30","sectionType":"section","heading":"Additional procedure if electronic application","content":"### sec.30 Additional procedure if electronic application\n\nFor an application made under section 29 , the magistrate may issue the warrant (the original warrant ) only if the magistrate is satisfied—\nit was necessary to make the application under section 29 ; and\nthe way the application was made under section 29 was appropriate.\nAfter the magistrate issues the original warrant—\nif there is a reasonably practicable way of immediately giving a copy of the warrant to the inspector, including, for example, by sending a copy by fax or email, the magistrate must immediately give a copy of the warrant to the inspector; or\notherwise—\nthe magistrate must tell the inspector the information mentioned in section 28 (4) ; and\nthe inspector must complete a form of warrant, including by writing on it the information mentioned in section 28 (4) provided by the magistrate.\nThe copy of the warrant mentioned in subsection (2) (a) , or the form of warrant completed under subsection (2) (b) (in either case the duplicate warrant ), is a duplicate of, and as effectual as, the original warrant.\nThe inspector must, at the first reasonable opportunity, send to the magistrate—\nthe written application complying with section 27 (2) and (3) ; and\nif the inspector completed a form of warrant under subsection (2) (b) —the completed form of warrant.\nThe magistrate must keep the original warrant and, on receiving the documents under subsection (4) —\nattach the documents to the original warrant; and\ngive the original warrant and documents to the clerk of the court of the relevant magistrates court.\nDespite subsection (3) , if—\nan issue arises in a proceeding about whether an exercise of a power was authorised by a warrant issued under this section; and\nthe original warrant is not produced in evidence;\nthe onus of proof is on the person relying on the lawfulness of the exercise of the power to prove a warrant authorised the exercise of the power.\nThis section does not limit section 27 .\nIn this section—\nrelevant magistrates court , in relation to a magistrate, means the Magistrates Court that the magistrate constitutes under the Magistrates Act 1991 .\n(sec.30-ssec.1) For an application made under section 29 , the magistrate may issue the warrant (the original warrant ) only if the magistrate is satisfied— it was necessary to make the application under section 29 ; and the way the application was made under section 29 was appropriate.\n(sec.30-ssec.2) After the magistrate issues the original warrant— if there is a reasonably practicable way of immediately giving a copy of the warrant to the inspector, including, for example, by sending a copy by fax or email, the magistrate must immediately give a copy of the warrant to the inspector; or otherwise— the magistrate must tell the inspector the information mentioned in section 28 (4) ; and the inspector must complete a form of warrant, including by writing on it the information mentioned in section 28 (4) provided by the magistrate.\n(sec.30-ssec.3) The copy of the warrant mentioned in subsection (2) (a) , or the form of warrant completed under subsection (2) (b) (in either case the duplicate warrant ), is a duplicate of, and as effectual as, the original warrant.\n(sec.30-ssec.4) The inspector must, at the first reasonable opportunity, send to the magistrate— the written application complying with section 27 (2) and (3) ; and if the inspector completed a form of warrant under subsection (2) (b) —the completed form of warrant.\n(sec.30-ssec.5) The magistrate must keep the original warrant and, on receiving the documents under subsection (4) — attach the documents to the original warrant; and give the original warrant and documents to the clerk of the court of the relevant magistrates court.\n(sec.30-ssec.6) Despite subsection (3) , if— an issue arises in a proceeding about whether an exercise of a power was authorised by a warrant issued under this section; and the original warrant is not produced in evidence; the onus of proof is on the person relying on the lawfulness of the exercise of the power to prove a warrant authorised the exercise of the power.\n(sec.30-ssec.7) This section does not limit section 27 .\n(sec.30-ssec.8) In this section— relevant magistrates court , in relation to a magistrate, means the Magistrates Court that the magistrate constitutes under the Magistrates Act 1991 .\n- (a) it was necessary to make the application under section 29 ; and\n- (b) the way the application was made under section 29 was appropriate.\n- (a) if there is a reasonably practicable way of immediately giving a copy of the warrant to the inspector, including, for example, by sending a copy by fax or email, the magistrate must immediately give a copy of the warrant to the inspector; or\n- (b) otherwise— (i) the magistrate must tell the inspector the information mentioned in section 28 (4) ; and (ii) the inspector must complete a form of warrant, including by writing on it the information mentioned in section 28 (4) provided by the magistrate.\n- (i) the magistrate must tell the inspector the information mentioned in section 28 (4) ; and\n- (ii) the inspector must complete a form of warrant, including by writing on it the information mentioned in section 28 (4) provided by the magistrate.\n- (i) the magistrate must tell the inspector the information mentioned in section 28 (4) ; and\n- (ii) the inspector must complete a form of warrant, including by writing on it the information mentioned in section 28 (4) provided by the magistrate.\n- (a) the written application complying with section 27 (2) and (3) ; and\n- (b) if the inspector completed a form of warrant under subsection (2) (b) —the completed form of warrant.\n- (a) attach the documents to the original warrant; and\n- (b) give the original warrant and documents to the clerk of the court of the relevant magistrates court.\n- (a) an issue arises in a proceeding about whether an exercise of a power was authorised by a warrant issued under this section; and\n- (b) the original warrant is not produced in evidence;","sortOrder":27},{"sectionNumber":"sec.31","sectionType":"section","heading":"Defect in relation to a warrant","content":"### sec.31 Defect in relation to a warrant\n\nA warrant is not invalidated by a defect in—\nthe warrant; or\ncompliance with this subdivision;\nunless the defect affects the substance of the warrant in a material particular.\nIn this section—\nwarrant includes a duplicate warrant mentioned in section 30 (3) .\n(sec.31-ssec.1) A warrant is not invalidated by a defect in— the warrant; or compliance with this subdivision; unless the defect affects the substance of the warrant in a material particular.\n(sec.31-ssec.2) In this section— warrant includes a duplicate warrant mentioned in section 30 (3) .\n- (a) the warrant; or\n- (b) compliance with this subdivision;","sortOrder":28},{"sectionNumber":"sec.32","sectionType":"section","heading":"Procedure","content":"### sec.32 Procedure\n\nThis section applies if an inspector is intending to enter a place under a warrant issued under this division.\nBefore entering the place, the inspector must do or make a reasonable attempt to do the following things—\nidentify himself or herself to a person who is an occupier of the place and is present by producing the inspector’s identity card or another document evidencing the inspector’s appointment;\ngive the person a copy of the warrant;\ntell the person the inspector is permitted by the warrant to enter the place;\ngive the person an opportunity to allow the inspector immediate entry to the place without using force.\nHowever, the inspector need not comply with subsection (2) if the inspector believes on reasonable grounds that entry to the place without compliance is required to ensure the execution of the warrant is not frustrated.\nIn this section—\nwarrant includes a duplicate warrant mentioned in section 30 (3) .\n(sec.32-ssec.1) This section applies if an inspector is intending to enter a place under a warrant issued under this division.\n(sec.32-ssec.2) Before entering the place, the inspector must do or make a reasonable attempt to do the following things— identify himself or herself to a person who is an occupier of the place and is present by producing the inspector’s identity card or another document evidencing the inspector’s appointment; give the person a copy of the warrant; tell the person the inspector is permitted by the warrant to enter the place; give the person an opportunity to allow the inspector immediate entry to the place without using force.\n(sec.32-ssec.3) However, the inspector need not comply with subsection (2) if the inspector believes on reasonable grounds that entry to the place without compliance is required to ensure the execution of the warrant is not frustrated.\n(sec.32-ssec.4) In this section— warrant includes a duplicate warrant mentioned in section 30 (3) .\n- (a) identify himself or herself to a person who is an occupier of the place and is present by producing the inspector’s identity card or another document evidencing the inspector’s appointment;\n- (b) give the person a copy of the warrant;\n- (c) tell the person the inspector is permitted by the warrant to enter the place;\n- (d) give the person an opportunity to allow the inspector immediate entry to the place without using force.","sortOrder":29},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.3","sectionType":"part","heading":"Other inspectors’ powers and related matters","content":"# Other inspectors’ powers and related matters","sortOrder":30},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.3-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Stopping or moving vehicles","content":"## Stopping or moving vehicles","sortOrder":31},{"sectionNumber":"sec.33","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of div 1","content":"### sec.33 Application of div 1\n\nThis division applies if an inspector reasonably suspects, or is aware, that a thing in or on a vehicle may provide evidence of the commission of an offence against this Act or a primary Act.","sortOrder":32},{"sectionNumber":"sec.34","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to stop or move","content":"### sec.34 Power to stop or move\n\nIf the vehicle is moving, the inspector may, to exercise his or her powers, signal or otherwise direct the person in control of the vehicle to stop the vehicle and to bring the vehicle to, and keep it at, a convenient place within a reasonable distance to allow the inspector to exercise the powers.\nIf the vehicle is stopped, the inspector may direct the person in control of the vehicle—\nnot to move it until the inspector has exercised the inspector’s powers; or\nto move the vehicle to, and keep it at, a stated reasonable place to allow the inspector to exercise the powers.\nWhen giving the direction under subsection (2) , the inspector must give the person in control an offence warning for the direction.\n(sec.34-ssec.1) If the vehicle is moving, the inspector may, to exercise his or her powers, signal or otherwise direct the person in control of the vehicle to stop the vehicle and to bring the vehicle to, and keep it at, a convenient place within a reasonable distance to allow the inspector to exercise the powers.\n(sec.34-ssec.2) If the vehicle is stopped, the inspector may direct the person in control of the vehicle— not to move it until the inspector has exercised the inspector’s powers; or to move the vehicle to, and keep it at, a stated reasonable place to allow the inspector to exercise the powers.\n(sec.34-ssec.3) When giving the direction under subsection (2) , the inspector must give the person in control an offence warning for the direction.\n- (a) not to move it until the inspector has exercised the inspector’s powers; or\n- (b) to move the vehicle to, and keep it at, a stated reasonable place to allow the inspector to exercise the powers.","sortOrder":33},{"sectionNumber":"sec.35","sectionType":"section","heading":"Identification requirements if vehicle moving","content":"### sec.35 Identification requirements if vehicle moving\n\nThis section applies if the inspector proposes to give a direction under section 34 (1) and the vehicle is moving.\nThe inspector must clearly identify himself or herself as an inspector exercising the inspector’s powers.\nIf the inspector is in a moving vehicle, he or she may use a loudhailer to identify himself or herself as an inspector exercising powers.\nIf the inspector is standing at the side of the road, he or she may use a sign to identify himself or herself as an inspector exercising powers.\nWhen the vehicle stops, the inspector must—\nhave with him or her the inspector’s identity card; and\nimmediately produce the identity card for the inspection of the person in control of the vehicle.\nSubsection (3) applies despite section 18 .\n(sec.35-ssec.1) This section applies if the inspector proposes to give a direction under section 34 (1) and the vehicle is moving.\n(sec.35-ssec.2) The inspector must clearly identify himself or herself as an inspector exercising the inspector’s powers. If the inspector is in a moving vehicle, he or she may use a loudhailer to identify himself or herself as an inspector exercising powers. If the inspector is standing at the side of the road, he or she may use a sign to identify himself or herself as an inspector exercising powers.\n(sec.35-ssec.3) When the vehicle stops, the inspector must— have with him or her the inspector’s identity card; and immediately produce the identity card for the inspection of the person in control of the vehicle.\n(sec.35-ssec.4) Subsection (3) applies despite section 18 .\n- 1 If the inspector is in a moving vehicle, he or she may use a loudhailer to identify himself or herself as an inspector exercising powers.\n- 2 If the inspector is standing at the side of the road, he or she may use a sign to identify himself or herself as an inspector exercising powers.\n- (a) have with him or her the inspector’s identity card; and\n- (b) immediately produce the identity card for the inspection of the person in control of the vehicle.","sortOrder":34},{"sectionNumber":"sec.36","sectionType":"section","heading":"Failure to comply with direction","content":"### sec.36 Failure to comply with direction\n\nThe person in control of the vehicle must comply with a direction under section 34 unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—165 penalty units.\nIt is a reasonable excuse for the person not to comply with a direction if—\nthe vehicle was moving and the inspector did not comply with section 35 ; or\nto comply immediately would have endangered someone else or caused loss or damage to property, and the person complies as soon as it is practicable to do so.\nSubsection (2) does not limit subsection (1) .\nA person does not commit an offence against subsection (1) if—\nthe direction the person fails to comply with is given under section 34 (2) ; and\nthe person is not given an offence warning for the direction.\n(sec.36-ssec.1) The person in control of the vehicle must comply with a direction under section 34 unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—165 penalty units.\n(sec.36-ssec.2) It is a reasonable excuse for the person not to comply with a direction if— the vehicle was moving and the inspector did not comply with section 35 ; or to comply immediately would have endangered someone else or caused loss or damage to property, and the person complies as soon as it is practicable to do so.\n(sec.36-ssec.3) Subsection (2) does not limit subsection (1) .\n(sec.36-ssec.4) A person does not commit an offence against subsection (1) if— the direction the person fails to comply with is given under section 34 (2) ; and the person is not given an offence warning for the direction.\n- (a) the vehicle was moving and the inspector did not comply with section 35 ; or\n- (b) to comply immediately would have endangered someone else or caused loss or damage to property, and the person complies as soon as it is practicable to do so.\n- (a) the direction the person fails to comply with is given under section 34 (2) ; and\n- (b) the person is not given an offence warning for the direction.","sortOrder":35},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.3-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"General powers of inspectors after entering places","content":"## General powers of inspectors after entering places","sortOrder":36},{"sectionNumber":"sec.37","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of div 2","content":"### sec.37 Application of div 2\n\nThe powers under this division may be exercised if an inspector enters a place under section 22 (1) (a) , (c) or (d) .\nHowever, if the inspector enters under section 22 (1) (a) or (c) , the powers under this division are subject to any conditions of the consent or terms of the warrant.\n(sec.37-ssec.1) The powers under this division may be exercised if an inspector enters a place under section 22 (1) (a) , (c) or (d) .\n(sec.37-ssec.2) However, if the inspector enters under section 22 (1) (a) or (c) , the powers under this division are subject to any conditions of the consent or terms of the warrant.","sortOrder":37},{"sectionNumber":"sec.38","sectionType":"section","heading":"General powers","content":"### sec.38 General powers\n\nThe inspector may do any of the following (each a general power )—\nsearch any part of the place;\ninspect, examine or film any part of the place or anything at the place;\ntake for examination a thing, or a sample of or from a thing, at the place;\nplace an identifying mark in or on anything at the place;\ntake an extract from, or copy, a document at the place, or take the document to another place to copy;\nproduce an image or writing at the place from an electronic document or, to the extent it is not practicable, take a thing containing an electronic document to another place to produce an image or writing;\ntake to, into or onto the place and use any person, equipment and materials the inspector reasonably requires for exercising the inspector’s powers under this division;\nremain at the place for the time necessary to achieve the purpose of the entry.\nThe inspector may take a necessary step to allow the exercise of a general power.\nIf the inspector takes a document from the place to copy it, the inspector must copy the document and return it to the place as soon as practicable.\nIf the inspector takes from the place an article or device reasonably capable of producing a document from an electronic document to produce the document, the inspector must produce the document and return the article or device to the place as soon as practicable.\nIn this section—\nexamine includes analyse, test, account, measure, weigh, grade, gauge and identify.\nfilm includes photograph, videotape and record an image in another way.\ninspect , a thing, includes open the thing and examine its contents.\n(sec.38-ssec.1) The inspector may do any of the following (each a general power )— search any part of the place; inspect, examine or film any part of the place or anything at the place; take for examination a thing, or a sample of or from a thing, at the place; place an identifying mark in or on anything at the place; take an extract from, or copy, a document at the place, or take the document to another place to copy; produce an image or writing at the place from an electronic document or, to the extent it is not practicable, take a thing containing an electronic document to another place to produce an image or writing; take to, into or onto the place and use any person, equipment and materials the inspector reasonably requires for exercising the inspector’s powers under this division; remain at the place for the time necessary to achieve the purpose of the entry.\n(sec.38-ssec.2) The inspector may take a necessary step to allow the exercise of a general power.\n(sec.38-ssec.3) If the inspector takes a document from the place to copy it, the inspector must copy the document and return it to the place as soon as practicable.\n(sec.38-ssec.4) If the inspector takes from the place an article or device reasonably capable of producing a document from an electronic document to produce the document, the inspector must produce the document and return the article or device to the place as soon as practicable.\n(sec.38-ssec.5) In this section— examine includes analyse, test, account, measure, weigh, grade, gauge and identify. film includes photograph, videotape and record an image in another way. inspect , a thing, includes open the thing and examine its contents.\n- (a) search any part of the place;\n- (b) inspect, examine or film any part of the place or anything at the place;\n- (c) take for examination a thing, or a sample of or from a thing, at the place;\n- (d) place an identifying mark in or on anything at the place;\n- (e) take an extract from, or copy, a document at the place, or take the document to another place to copy;\n- (f) produce an image or writing at the place from an electronic document or, to the extent it is not practicable, take a thing containing an electronic document to another place to produce an image or writing;\n- (g) take to, into or onto the place and use any person, equipment and materials the inspector reasonably requires for exercising the inspector’s powers under this division;\n- (h) remain at the place for the time necessary to achieve the purpose of the entry.","sortOrder":38},{"sectionNumber":"sec.39","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to require reasonable help","content":"### sec.39 Power to require reasonable help\n\nThe inspector may make a requirement (a help requirement ) of an occupier of the place or a person at the place to give the inspector reasonable help to exercise a general power, including, for example, to produce a document or to give information.\nWhen making the help requirement, the inspector must give the person an offence warning for the requirement.\n(sec.39-ssec.1) The inspector may make a requirement (a help requirement ) of an occupier of the place or a person at the place to give the inspector reasonable help to exercise a general power, including, for example, to produce a document or to give information.\n(sec.39-ssec.2) When making the help requirement, the inspector must give the person an offence warning for the requirement.","sortOrder":39},{"sectionNumber":"sec.40","sectionType":"section","heading":"Offence to contravene help requirement","content":"### sec.40 Offence to contravene help requirement\n\nA person of whom a help requirement has been made must comply with the requirement unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units or 1 year’s imprisonment.\nIt is a reasonable excuse for an individual not to comply with a help requirement if complying might tend to incriminate the individual or expose the individual to a penalty.\nHowever, subsection (2) does not apply if a document or information the subject of the help requirement is required to be held or kept by the defendant under this Act or a primary Act.\nSee, however, section 71 .\n(sec.40-ssec.1) A person of whom a help requirement has been made must comply with the requirement unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units or 1 year’s imprisonment.\n(sec.40-ssec.2) It is a reasonable excuse for an individual not to comply with a help requirement if complying might tend to incriminate the individual or expose the individual to a penalty.\n(sec.40-ssec.3) However, subsection (2) does not apply if a document or information the subject of the help requirement is required to be held or kept by the defendant under this Act or a primary Act. See, however, section 71 .","sortOrder":40},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.3-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Seizure by inspectors and forfeiture","content":"## Seizure by inspectors and forfeiture","sortOrder":41},{"sectionNumber":"sec.41","sectionType":"section","heading":"Seizing evidence at a place that may be entered without consent or warrant","content":"### sec.41 Seizing evidence at a place that may be entered without consent or warrant\n\nAn inspector who enters a place the inspector may enter under this Act without the consent of an occupier of the place and without a warrant under section 28 (2) may seize a thing at the place if the inspector reasonably believes the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\nSubsection (1) applies even if the entry is under a warrant issued under section 28 (3) .\n(sec.41-ssec.1) An inspector who enters a place the inspector may enter under this Act without the consent of an occupier of the place and without a warrant under section 28 (2) may seize a thing at the place if the inspector reasonably believes the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\n(sec.41-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies even if the entry is under a warrant issued under section 28 (3) .","sortOrder":42},{"sectionNumber":"sec.42","sectionType":"section","heading":"Seizing evidence at a place that may be entered only with consent or warrant","content":"### sec.42 Seizing evidence at a place that may be entered only with consent or warrant\n\nThis section applies if—\nan inspector is authorised to enter a place only with the consent of an occupier of the place or a warrant; and\nthe inspector enters the place after obtaining the consent or under a warrant issued under section 28 (2) .\nIf the inspector enters the place with the occupier’s consent, the inspector may seize a thing at the place only if—\nthe inspector reasonably believes the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act or a primary Act; and\nseizure of the thing is consistent with the purpose of entry as explained to the occupier when asking for the occupier’s consent.\nIf the inspector enters the place under a warrant issued under section 28 (2) , the inspector may seize the evidence for which the warrant was issued.\nThe inspector may also seize anything else at the place if the inspector reasonably believes—\nthe thing is evidence of an offence against this Act or a primary Act; and\nthe seizure is necessary to prevent the thing being hidden, lost or destroyed.\nThe inspector may also seize a thing at the place if the inspector reasonably believes it has just been used in committing an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\n(sec.42-ssec.1) This section applies if— an inspector is authorised to enter a place only with the consent of an occupier of the place or a warrant; and the inspector enters the place after obtaining the consent or under a warrant issued under section 28 (2) .\n(sec.42-ssec.2) If the inspector enters the place with the occupier’s consent, the inspector may seize a thing at the place only if— the inspector reasonably believes the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act or a primary Act; and seizure of the thing is consistent with the purpose of entry as explained to the occupier when asking for the occupier’s consent.\n(sec.42-ssec.3) If the inspector enters the place under a warrant issued under section 28 (2) , the inspector may seize the evidence for which the warrant was issued.\n(sec.42-ssec.4) The inspector may also seize anything else at the place if the inspector reasonably believes— the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act or a primary Act; and the seizure is necessary to prevent the thing being hidden, lost or destroyed.\n(sec.42-ssec.5) The inspector may also seize a thing at the place if the inspector reasonably believes it has just been used in committing an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\n- (a) an inspector is authorised to enter a place only with the consent of an occupier of the place or a warrant; and\n- (b) the inspector enters the place after obtaining the consent or under a warrant issued under section 28 (2) .\n- (a) the inspector reasonably believes the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act or a primary Act; and\n- (b) seizure of the thing is consistent with the purpose of entry as explained to the occupier when asking for the occupier’s consent.\n- (a) the thing is evidence of an offence against this Act or a primary Act; and\n- (b) the seizure is necessary to prevent the thing being hidden, lost or destroyed.","sortOrder":43},{"sectionNumber":"sec.43","sectionType":"section","heading":"Seizure of property subject to security","content":"### sec.43 Seizure of property subject to security\n\nAn inspector may seize a thing, and exercise powers relating to the thing, despite a lien or other security over the thing claimed by another person.\nHowever, the seizure does not affect the other person’s claim to the lien or other security against a person other than the inspector or a person acting for the inspector.\n(sec.43-ssec.1) An inspector may seize a thing, and exercise powers relating to the thing, despite a lien or other security over the thing claimed by another person.\n(sec.43-ssec.2) However, the seizure does not affect the other person’s claim to the lien or other security against a person other than the inspector or a person acting for the inspector.","sortOrder":44},{"sectionNumber":"sec.44","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to secure seized thing","content":"### sec.44 Power to secure seized thing\n\nHaving seized a thing under this division, an inspector may—\nleave it at the place where it was seized (the place of seizure ) and take reasonable action to restrict access to it; or\nmove it from the place of seizure.\nFor subsection (1) (a) , the inspector may, for example—\nseal the thing, or the entrance to the place of seizure, and mark the thing or place to show access to the thing or place is restricted; or\nfor equipment—make it inoperable; or\nmake it inoperable by dismantling it or removing a component without which the equipment can not be used\nrequire a person the inspector reasonably believes is in control of the place or thing to do an act mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) or anything else an inspector could do under subsection (1) (a) .\n(sec.44-ssec.1) Having seized a thing under this division, an inspector may— leave it at the place where it was seized (the place of seizure ) and take reasonable action to restrict access to it; or move it from the place of seizure.\n(sec.44-ssec.2) For subsection (1) (a) , the inspector may, for example— seal the thing, or the entrance to the place of seizure, and mark the thing or place to show access to the thing or place is restricted; or for equipment—make it inoperable; or make it inoperable by dismantling it or removing a component without which the equipment can not be used require a person the inspector reasonably believes is in control of the place or thing to do an act mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) or anything else an inspector could do under subsection (1) (a) .\n- (a) leave it at the place where it was seized (the place of seizure ) and take reasonable action to restrict access to it; or\n- (b) move it from the place of seizure.\n- (a) seal the thing, or the entrance to the place of seizure, and mark the thing or place to show access to the thing or place is restricted; or\n- (b) for equipment—make it inoperable; or Example— make it inoperable by dismantling it or removing a component without which the equipment can not be used\n- (c) require a person the inspector reasonably believes is in control of the place or thing to do an act mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) or anything else an inspector could do under subsection (1) (a) .","sortOrder":45},{"sectionNumber":"sec.45","sectionType":"section","heading":"Offence to contravene other seizure requirement","content":"### sec.45 Offence to contravene other seizure requirement\n\nA person must comply with a requirement made of the person under section 44 (2) (c) unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—50 penalty units.","sortOrder":46},{"sectionNumber":"sec.46","sectionType":"section","heading":"Offence to interfere","content":"### sec.46 Offence to interfere\n\nIf access to a seized thing is restricted under section 44 , a person must not tamper with the thing or with anything used to restrict access to the thing without—\nan inspector’s approval; or\na reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—50 penalty units.\nIf access to a place is restricted under section 44 , a person must not enter the place in contravention of the restriction or tamper with anything used to restrict access to the place without—\nan inspector’s approval; or\na reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—50 penalty units.\n(sec.46-ssec.1) If access to a seized thing is restricted under section 44 , a person must not tamper with the thing or with anything used to restrict access to the thing without— an inspector’s approval; or a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.\n(sec.46-ssec.2) If access to a place is restricted under section 44 , a person must not enter the place in contravention of the restriction or tamper with anything used to restrict access to the place without— an inspector’s approval; or a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.\n- (a) an inspector’s approval; or\n- (b) a reasonable excuse.\n- (a) an inspector’s approval; or\n- (b) a reasonable excuse.","sortOrder":47},{"sectionNumber":"sec.47","sectionType":"section","heading":"Receipt and information notice for seized thing","content":"### sec.47 Receipt and information notice for seized thing\n\nThis section applies if an inspector seizes anything under this division unless—\nthe inspector reasonably believes there is no-one apparently in possession of the thing or the thing has been abandoned; or\nbecause of the condition, nature and value of the thing it would be unreasonable to require the inspector to comply with this section.\nThe inspector must, as soon as practicable after seizing the thing, give an owner or person in control of the thing before it was seized—\na receipt for the thing that generally describes the thing and its condition; and\nan information notice about the decision to seize it.\nHowever, if an owner or person from whom the thing is seized is not present when it is seized, the receipt and information notice may be given by leaving them in a conspicuous position and in a reasonably secure way at the place at which the thing is seized.\nThe receipt and information notice may—\nbe given in the same document; and\nrelate to more than 1 seized thing.\nThe inspector may delay giving the receipt and information notice if the inspector reasonably suspects giving them may frustrate or otherwise hinder an investigation by the inspector under this Act.\nHowever, the delay may be only for so long as the inspector continues to have the reasonable suspicion and remains in the vicinity of the place at which the thing was seized to keep it under observation.\n(sec.47-ssec.1) This section applies if an inspector seizes anything under this division unless— the inspector reasonably believes there is no-one apparently in possession of the thing or the thing has been abandoned; or because of the condition, nature and value of the thing it would be unreasonable to require the inspector to comply with this section.\n(sec.47-ssec.2) The inspector must, as soon as practicable after seizing the thing, give an owner or person in control of the thing before it was seized— a receipt for the thing that generally describes the thing and its condition; and an information notice about the decision to seize it.\n(sec.47-ssec.3) However, if an owner or person from whom the thing is seized is not present when it is seized, the receipt and information notice may be given by leaving them in a conspicuous position and in a reasonably secure way at the place at which the thing is seized.\n(sec.47-ssec.4) The receipt and information notice may— be given in the same document; and relate to more than 1 seized thing.\n(sec.47-ssec.5) The inspector may delay giving the receipt and information notice if the inspector reasonably suspects giving them may frustrate or otherwise hinder an investigation by the inspector under this Act.\n(sec.47-ssec.6) However, the delay may be only for so long as the inspector continues to have the reasonable suspicion and remains in the vicinity of the place at which the thing was seized to keep it under observation.\n- (a) the inspector reasonably believes there is no-one apparently in possession of the thing or the thing has been abandoned; or\n- (b) because of the condition, nature and value of the thing it would be unreasonable to require the inspector to comply with this section.\n- (a) a receipt for the thing that generally describes the thing and its condition; and\n- (b) an information notice about the decision to seize it.\n- (a) be given in the same document; and\n- (b) relate to more than 1 seized thing.","sortOrder":48},{"sectionNumber":"sec.48","sectionType":"section","heading":"Access to seized thing","content":"### sec.48 Access to seized thing\n\nUntil a seized thing is forfeited or returned, the inspector who seized the thing must allow an owner of the thing—\nto inspect it at any reasonable time and from time to time; and\nif it is a document—to copy it.\nSubsection (1) does not apply if it is impracticable or would be unreasonable to allow the inspection or copying.\nThe inspection or copying must be allowed free of charge.\n(sec.48-ssec.1) Until a seized thing is forfeited or returned, the inspector who seized the thing must allow an owner of the thing— to inspect it at any reasonable time and from time to time; and if it is a document—to copy it.\n(sec.48-ssec.2) Subsection (1) does not apply if it is impracticable or would be unreasonable to allow the inspection or copying.\n(sec.48-ssec.3) The inspection or copying must be allowed free of charge.\n- (a) to inspect it at any reasonable time and from time to time; and\n- (b) if it is a document—to copy it.","sortOrder":49},{"sectionNumber":"sec.49","sectionType":"section","heading":"Return of seized thing","content":"### sec.49 Return of seized thing\n\nThis section applies if a seized thing has some intrinsic value and is not—\nforfeited or transferred under subdivision 4 or 5 ; or\nsubject to a disposal order under division 4 .\nThe inspector must return the seized thing to an owner—\ngenerally—at the end of 1 year after the seizure; or\nif a proceeding for an offence involving the thing is started within the 1 year—at the end of the proceeding and any appeal from the proceeding.\nDespite subsection (2) , if the thing was seized as evidence, the inspector must return the thing seized to an owner as soon as practicable after the inspector is satisfied—\nits continued retention as evidence is no longer necessary; and\nit is lawful for the owner to possess it.\nNothing in this section affects a lien or other security over the seized thing.\n(sec.49-ssec.1) This section applies if a seized thing has some intrinsic value and is not— forfeited or transferred under subdivision 4 or 5 ; or subject to a disposal order under division 4 .\n(sec.49-ssec.2) The inspector must return the seized thing to an owner— generally—at the end of 1 year after the seizure; or if a proceeding for an offence involving the thing is started within the 1 year—at the end of the proceeding and any appeal from the proceeding.\n(sec.49-ssec.3) Despite subsection (2) , if the thing was seized as evidence, the inspector must return the thing seized to an owner as soon as practicable after the inspector is satisfied— its continued retention as evidence is no longer necessary; and it is lawful for the owner to possess it.\n(sec.49-ssec.4) Nothing in this section affects a lien or other security over the seized thing.\n- (a) forfeited or transferred under subdivision 4 or 5 ; or\n- (b) subject to a disposal order under division 4 .\n- (a) generally—at the end of 1 year after the seizure; or\n- (b) if a proceeding for an offence involving the thing is started within the 1 year—at the end of the proceeding and any appeal from the proceeding.\n- (a) its continued retention as evidence is no longer necessary; and\n- (b) it is lawful for the owner to possess it.","sortOrder":50},{"sectionNumber":"sec.50","sectionType":"section","heading":"Forfeiture by chief executive decision","content":"### sec.50 Forfeiture by chief executive decision\n\nThe chief executive may decide a seized thing is forfeited to the State if an inspector—\nafter making reasonable inquiries, can not find an owner; or\nafter making reasonable efforts, can not return it to an owner; or\nreasonably believes it is necessary to keep the thing to prevent it being used to commit the offence for which it was seized.\nHowever, the inspector is not required to—\nmake inquiries if it would be unreasonable to make inquiries to find an owner; or\nmake efforts if it would be unreasonable to make efforts to return the thing to an owner.\nthe owner of the thing has migrated to another country\nRegard must be had to the thing’s condition, nature and value in deciding—\nwhether it is reasonable to make inquiries or efforts; and\nif inquiries or efforts are made—what inquiries or efforts, including the period over which they are made, are reasonable.\n(sec.50-ssec.1) The chief executive may decide a seized thing is forfeited to the State if an inspector— after making reasonable inquiries, can not find an owner; or after making reasonable efforts, can not return it to an owner; or reasonably believes it is necessary to keep the thing to prevent it being used to commit the offence for which it was seized.\n(sec.50-ssec.2) However, the inspector is not required to— make inquiries if it would be unreasonable to make inquiries to find an owner; or make efforts if it would be unreasonable to make efforts to return the thing to an owner. the owner of the thing has migrated to another country\n(sec.50-ssec.3) Regard must be had to the thing’s condition, nature and value in deciding— whether it is reasonable to make inquiries or efforts; and if inquiries or efforts are made—what inquiries or efforts, including the period over which they are made, are reasonable.\n- (a) after making reasonable inquiries, can not find an owner; or\n- (b) after making reasonable efforts, can not return it to an owner; or\n- (c) reasonably believes it is necessary to keep the thing to prevent it being used to commit the offence for which it was seized.\n- (a) make inquiries if it would be unreasonable to make inquiries to find an owner; or\n- (b) make efforts if it would be unreasonable to make efforts to return the thing to an owner. Example for paragraph (b) — the owner of the thing has migrated to another country\n- (a) whether it is reasonable to make inquiries or efforts; and\n- (b) if inquiries or efforts are made—what inquiries or efforts, including the period over which they are made, are reasonable.","sortOrder":51},{"sectionNumber":"sec.51","sectionType":"section","heading":"Information notice about forfeiture decision","content":"### sec.51 Information notice about forfeiture decision\n\nIf the chief executive decides under section 50 (1) to forfeit a thing, the chief executive must as soon as practicable give a person who owned the thing immediately before the forfeiture (the former owner ) an information notice about the decision.\nIf the decision was made under section 50 (1) (a) or (b) , the information notice may be given by leaving it at the place where the thing was seized, in a conspicuous position and in a reasonably secure way.\nThe information notice must state that the former owner may apply for a stay of the decision if he or she appeals against the decision.\nHowever, subsections (1) to (3) do not apply if—\nthe decision was made under section 50 (1) (a) or (b) ; and\nthe place where the thing was seized is—\na public place; or\na place where the notice is unlikely to be read by the former owner.\n(sec.51-ssec.1) If the chief executive decides under section 50 (1) to forfeit a thing, the chief executive must as soon as practicable give a person who owned the thing immediately before the forfeiture (the former owner ) an information notice about the decision.\n(sec.51-ssec.2) If the decision was made under section 50 (1) (a) or (b) , the information notice may be given by leaving it at the place where the thing was seized, in a conspicuous position and in a reasonably secure way.\n(sec.51-ssec.3) The information notice must state that the former owner may apply for a stay of the decision if he or she appeals against the decision.\n(sec.51-ssec.4) However, subsections (1) to (3) do not apply if— the decision was made under section 50 (1) (a) or (b) ; and the place where the thing was seized is— a public place; or a place where the notice is unlikely to be read by the former owner.\n- (a) the decision was made under section 50 (1) (a) or (b) ; and\n- (b) the place where the thing was seized is— (i) a public place; or (ii) a place where the notice is unlikely to be read by the former owner.\n- (i) a public place; or\n- (ii) a place where the notice is unlikely to be read by the former owner.\n- (i) a public place; or\n- (ii) a place where the notice is unlikely to be read by the former owner.","sortOrder":52},{"sectionNumber":"sec.52","sectionType":"section","heading":"When thing becomes property of the State","content":"### sec.52 When thing becomes property of the State\n\nA thing becomes the property of the State if—\nthe thing is forfeited to the State under section 50 (1) ; or\nthe owner of the thing and the State agree, in writing, to the transfer of the ownership of the thing to the State.\n- (a) the thing is forfeited to the State under section 50 (1) ; or\n- (b) the owner of the thing and the State agree, in writing, to the transfer of the ownership of the thing to the State.","sortOrder":53},{"sectionNumber":"sec.53","sectionType":"section","heading":"How property may be dealt with","content":"### sec.53 How property may be dealt with\n\nThis section applies if, under section 52 , a thing becomes the property of the State.\nThe chief executive may deal with the thing as the chief executive considers appropriate, including, for example, by destroying it or giving it away.\nThe chief executive must not deal with the thing in a way that could prejudice the outcome of an appeal against the forfeiture under this Act.\nIf the chief executive sells the thing, the chief executive may, after deducting the costs of the sale, return the proceeds of the sale to the former owner of the thing.\nThis section is subject to any disposal order made for the thing.\n(sec.53-ssec.1) This section applies if, under section 52 , a thing becomes the property of the State.\n(sec.53-ssec.2) The chief executive may deal with the thing as the chief executive considers appropriate, including, for example, by destroying it or giving it away.\n(sec.53-ssec.3) The chief executive must not deal with the thing in a way that could prejudice the outcome of an appeal against the forfeiture under this Act.\n(sec.53-ssec.4) If the chief executive sells the thing, the chief executive may, after deducting the costs of the sale, return the proceeds of the sale to the former owner of the thing.\n(sec.53-ssec.5) This section is subject to any disposal order made for the thing.","sortOrder":54},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.3-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Disposal orders","content":"## Disposal orders","sortOrder":55},{"sectionNumber":"sec.54","sectionType":"section","heading":"Disposal order","content":"### sec.54 Disposal order\n\nThis section applies if a person is convicted of an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\nThe court may make an order (a disposal order ), on its own initiative or on an application by the prosecution, for the disposal of any of the following things owned by the person—\nanything that was the subject of, or used to commit, the offence;\nanother thing the court considers is likely to be used by the person or another person in committing a further offence against this Act.\nThe court may make a disposal order for a thing—\nwhether or not it has been seized under this Act; and\nif the thing has been seized—whether or not it has been returned to the former owner.\nIn deciding whether to make a disposal order for a thing, the court—\nmay require notice to be given to anyone the court considers appropriate, including, for example, any person who may have any property in the thing; and\nmust hear any submissions that any person claiming to have any property in the thing may wish to make.\nThe court may make any order to enforce the disposal order that it considers appropriate.\nThis section does not limit the court’s powers under another law.\n(sec.54-ssec.1) This section applies if a person is convicted of an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\n(sec.54-ssec.2) The court may make an order (a disposal order ), on its own initiative or on an application by the prosecution, for the disposal of any of the following things owned by the person— anything that was the subject of, or used to commit, the offence; another thing the court considers is likely to be used by the person or another person in committing a further offence against this Act.\n(sec.54-ssec.3) The court may make a disposal order for a thing— whether or not it has been seized under this Act; and if the thing has been seized—whether or not it has been returned to the former owner.\n(sec.54-ssec.4) In deciding whether to make a disposal order for a thing, the court— may require notice to be given to anyone the court considers appropriate, including, for example, any person who may have any property in the thing; and must hear any submissions that any person claiming to have any property in the thing may wish to make.\n(sec.54-ssec.5) The court may make any order to enforce the disposal order that it considers appropriate.\n(sec.54-ssec.6) This section does not limit the court’s powers under another law.\n- (a) anything that was the subject of, or used to commit, the offence;\n- (b) another thing the court considers is likely to be used by the person or another person in committing a further offence against this Act.\n- (a) whether or not it has been seized under this Act; and\n- (b) if the thing has been seized—whether or not it has been returned to the former owner.\n- (a) may require notice to be given to anyone the court considers appropriate, including, for example, any person who may have any property in the thing; and\n- (b) must hear any submissions that any person claiming to have any property in the thing may wish to make.","sortOrder":56},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.3-div.5","sectionType":"division","heading":"Other information-obtaining powers of inspectors","content":"## Other information-obtaining powers of inspectors","sortOrder":57},{"sectionNumber":"sec.55","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to require name and address","content":"### sec.55 Power to require name and address\n\nThis section applies if an inspector—\nfinds a person committing an offence against this Act or a primary Act; or\nfinds a person in circumstances that lead the inspector to reasonably suspect the person has just committed an offence against this Act or a primary Act; or\nhas information that leads the inspector to reasonably suspect a person has just committed an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\nThe inspector may require the person to state the person’s name and address.\nThe inspector may also require the person to give evidence of the correctness of the stated name or address if, in the circumstances, it would be reasonable to expect the person to—\nbe in possession of evidence of the correctness of the stated name or address; or\notherwise be able to give the evidence.\nWhen making a personal details requirement, the inspector must give the person an offence warning for the requirement.\nA requirement under this section is a personal details requirement .\nIn this section—\naddress , of a person, includes the person’s residential and business address and, for a person temporarily in Queensland, includes the place where the person is living in Queensland.\n(sec.55-ssec.1) This section applies if an inspector— finds a person committing an offence against this Act or a primary Act; or finds a person in circumstances that lead the inspector to reasonably suspect the person has just committed an offence against this Act or a primary Act; or has information that leads the inspector to reasonably suspect a person has just committed an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\n(sec.55-ssec.2) The inspector may require the person to state the person’s name and address.\n(sec.55-ssec.3) The inspector may also require the person to give evidence of the correctness of the stated name or address if, in the circumstances, it would be reasonable to expect the person to— be in possession of evidence of the correctness of the stated name or address; or otherwise be able to give the evidence.\n(sec.55-ssec.4) When making a personal details requirement, the inspector must give the person an offence warning for the requirement.\n(sec.55-ssec.5) A requirement under this section is a personal details requirement .\n(sec.55-ssec.6) In this section— address , of a person, includes the person’s residential and business address and, for a person temporarily in Queensland, includes the place where the person is living in Queensland.\n- (a) finds a person committing an offence against this Act or a primary Act; or\n- (b) finds a person in circumstances that lead the inspector to reasonably suspect the person has just committed an offence against this Act or a primary Act; or\n- (c) has information that leads the inspector to reasonably suspect a person has just committed an offence against this Act or a primary Act.\n- (a) be in possession of evidence of the correctness of the stated name or address; or\n- (b) otherwise be able to give the evidence.","sortOrder":58},{"sectionNumber":"sec.56","sectionType":"section","heading":"Offence to contravene personal details requirement","content":"### sec.56 Offence to contravene personal details requirement\n\nA person of whom a personal details requirement has been made must comply with the requirement unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—50 penalty units.\nA person may not be convicted of an offence under subsection (1) unless the person is found guilty of the offence in relation to which the personal details requirement was made.\n(sec.56-ssec.1) A person of whom a personal details requirement has been made must comply with the requirement unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—50 penalty units.\n(sec.56-ssec.2) A person may not be convicted of an offence under subsection (1) unless the person is found guilty of the offence in relation to which the personal details requirement was made.","sortOrder":59},{"sectionNumber":"sec.57","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to require production of document","content":"### sec.57 Power to require production of document\n\nAn inspector may require a person to make available for inspection by an inspector, or to produce to the inspector for inspection, at a reasonable time and place nominated by the inspector—\na document issued to the person under a primary Act; or\na document required to be kept by the person under a primary Act; or\nif a document or information required to be kept by the person under a primary Act is stored or recorded by means of a device—a document that is a clear written reproduction of the stored or recorded document or information.\nA requirement under subsection (1) is a document production requirement .\nFor an electronic document, compliance with the document production requirement requires the making available or production of a clear written reproduction of the electronic document.\nThe inspector may keep the document to copy it.\nIf the inspector copies the document, or an entry in the document, the inspector may require the person responsible for keeping the document to certify the copy as a true copy of the document or entry.\nA requirement under subsection (5) is a document certification requirement .\nThe inspector must return the document to the person as soon as practicable after copying it.\nHowever, if a document certification requirement is made of a person, the inspector may keep the document until the person complies with the requirement.\n(sec.57-ssec.1) An inspector may require a person to make available for inspection by an inspector, or to produce to the inspector for inspection, at a reasonable time and place nominated by the inspector— a document issued to the person under a primary Act; or a document required to be kept by the person under a primary Act; or if a document or information required to be kept by the person under a primary Act is stored or recorded by means of a device—a document that is a clear written reproduction of the stored or recorded document or information.\n(sec.57-ssec.2) A requirement under subsection (1) is a document production requirement .\n(sec.57-ssec.3) For an electronic document, compliance with the document production requirement requires the making available or production of a clear written reproduction of the electronic document.\n(sec.57-ssec.4) The inspector may keep the document to copy it.\n(sec.57-ssec.5) If the inspector copies the document, or an entry in the document, the inspector may require the person responsible for keeping the document to certify the copy as a true copy of the document or entry.\n(sec.57-ssec.6) A requirement under subsection (5) is a document certification requirement .\n(sec.57-ssec.7) The inspector must return the document to the person as soon as practicable after copying it.\n(sec.57-ssec.8) However, if a document certification requirement is made of a person, the inspector may keep the document until the person complies with the requirement.\n- (a) a document issued to the person under a primary Act; or\n- (b) a document required to be kept by the person under a primary Act; or\n- (c) if a document or information required to be kept by the person under a primary Act is stored or recorded by means of a device—a document that is a clear written reproduction of the stored or recorded document or information.","sortOrder":60},{"sectionNumber":"sec.58","sectionType":"section","heading":"Offence to contravene document production requirement","content":"### sec.58 Offence to contravene document production requirement\n\nA person of whom a document production requirement has been made must comply with the requirement unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nIt is not a reasonable excuse for a person to fail to comply with a document production requirement on the basis that complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty.\nSee, however, section 71 .\nThe inspector must inform the person, in a way that is reasonable in the circumstances—\nthat the person must comply with the document production requirement even though complying might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty; and\nthat, under section 71 , there is a limited immunity against the future use of the information or document given in compliance with the requirement.\nIf the person fails to comply with the document production requirement when the inspector has failed to comply with subsection (3) , the person can not be convicted of the offence against subsection (1) .\nIf a court convicts a person of an offence against subsection (1) , the court may, as well as imposing a penalty for the offence, order the person to comply with the document production requirement.\n(sec.58-ssec.1) A person of whom a document production requirement has been made must comply with the requirement unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.58-ssec.2) It is not a reasonable excuse for a person to fail to comply with a document production requirement on the basis that complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty. See, however, section 71 .\n(sec.58-ssec.3) The inspector must inform the person, in a way that is reasonable in the circumstances— that the person must comply with the document production requirement even though complying might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty; and that, under section 71 , there is a limited immunity against the future use of the information or document given in compliance with the requirement.\n(sec.58-ssec.4) If the person fails to comply with the document production requirement when the inspector has failed to comply with subsection (3) , the person can not be convicted of the offence against subsection (1) .\n(sec.58-ssec.5) If a court convicts a person of an offence against subsection (1) , the court may, as well as imposing a penalty for the offence, order the person to comply with the document production requirement.\n- (a) that the person must comply with the document production requirement even though complying might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty; and\n- (b) that, under section 71 , there is a limited immunity against the future use of the information or document given in compliance with the requirement.","sortOrder":61},{"sectionNumber":"sec.59","sectionType":"section","heading":"Offence to contravene document certification requirement","content":"### sec.59 Offence to contravene document certification requirement\n\nA person of whom a document certification requirement has been made must comply with the requirement unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units.\nIt is not a reasonable excuse for a person to fail to comply with a document certification requirement on the basis that complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty.\nSee, however, section 71 .\nThe inspector must inform the person, in a way that is reasonable in the circumstances—\nthat the person must comply with the document certification requirement even though complying might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty; and\nthat, under section 71 , there is a limited immunity against the future use of the information or document given in compliance with the requirement.\nIf the person fails to comply with the document certification requirement when the inspector has failed to comply with subsection (3) , the person can not be convicted of the offence against subsection (1) .\n(sec.59-ssec.1) A person of whom a document certification requirement has been made must comply with the requirement unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units.\n(sec.59-ssec.2) It is not a reasonable excuse for a person to fail to comply with a document certification requirement on the basis that complying with the requirement might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty. See, however, section 71 .\n(sec.59-ssec.3) The inspector must inform the person, in a way that is reasonable in the circumstances— that the person must comply with the document certification requirement even though complying might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty; and that, under section 71 , there is a limited immunity against the future use of the information or document given in compliance with the requirement.\n(sec.59-ssec.4) If the person fails to comply with the document certification requirement when the inspector has failed to comply with subsection (3) , the person can not be convicted of the offence against subsection (1) .\n- (a) that the person must comply with the document certification requirement even though complying might tend to incriminate the person or expose the person to a penalty; and\n- (b) that, under section 71 , there is a limited immunity against the future use of the information or document given in compliance with the requirement.","sortOrder":62},{"sectionNumber":"sec.60","sectionType":"section","heading":"Power to require information","content":"### sec.60 Power to require information\n\nThis section applies if an inspector reasonably believes—\nan offence against this Act or a primary Act has been committed; and\na person may be able to give information about the offence.\nThe inspector may, by notice given to the person, require the person to give the inspector information related to the offence at a stated reasonable time and place.\nA requirement under subsection (2) is an information requirement .\nFor information that is an electronic document, compliance with the information requirement requires the giving of a clear image or written version of the electronic document.\nIn this section—\ninformation includes a document.\n(sec.60-ssec.1) This section applies if an inspector reasonably believes— an offence against this Act or a primary Act has been committed; and a person may be able to give information about the offence.\n(sec.60-ssec.2) The inspector may, by notice given to the person, require the person to give the inspector information related to the offence at a stated reasonable time and place.\n(sec.60-ssec.3) A requirement under subsection (2) is an information requirement .\n(sec.60-ssec.4) For information that is an electronic document, compliance with the information requirement requires the giving of a clear image or written version of the electronic document.\n(sec.60-ssec.5) In this section— information includes a document.\n- (a) an offence against this Act or a primary Act has been committed; and\n- (b) a person may be able to give information about the offence.","sortOrder":63},{"sectionNumber":"sec.61","sectionType":"section","heading":"Offence to contravene information requirement","content":"### sec.61 Offence to contravene information requirement\n\nA person of whom an information requirement is made must comply with the requirement unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units or 1 year’s imprisonment.\nIt is a reasonable excuse for an individual not to give the information if giving the information might tend to incriminate the individual or expose the individual to a penalty.\n(sec.61-ssec.1) A person of whom an information requirement is made must comply with the requirement unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units or 1 year’s imprisonment.\n(sec.61-ssec.2) It is a reasonable excuse for an individual not to give the information if giving the information might tend to incriminate the individual or expose the individual to a penalty.","sortOrder":64},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.4","sectionType":"part","heading":"Obtaining criminal history reports","content":"# Obtaining criminal history reports","sortOrder":65},{"sectionNumber":"sec.62","sectionType":"section","heading":"Purpose of pt 4","content":"### sec.62 Purpose of pt 4\n\nThe purpose of this part is to help an inspector to decide whether the inspector’s unaccompanied entry of a place under part 2 would create an unacceptable level of risk to the inspector’s safety.","sortOrder":66},{"sectionNumber":"sec.63","sectionType":"section","heading":"Chief executive’s power to obtain criminal history report","content":"### sec.63 Chief executive’s power to obtain criminal history report\n\nThe chief executive may ask the commissioner of the police service for a written report about the criminal history of a person if an inspector reasonably suspects the person—\nmay be present at a place when the inspector enters the place under part 2 ; and\nmay create an unacceptable level of risk to the inspector’s safety.\nThe commissioner of the police service must give the report to the chief executive.\nHowever, the report is required to contain only criminal history in the commissioner’s possession or to which the commissioner has access.\nThe chief executive must examine the report and identify, to the extent it is reasonably practicable to do so, offences involving the use of a weapon or violence against a person.\nThe chief executive may give the inspector information in the report about the offences identified under subsection (4) .\n(sec.63-ssec.1) The chief executive may ask the commissioner of the police service for a written report about the criminal history of a person if an inspector reasonably suspects the person— may be present at a place when the inspector enters the place under part 2 ; and may create an unacceptable level of risk to the inspector’s safety.\n(sec.63-ssec.2) The commissioner of the police service must give the report to the chief executive.\n(sec.63-ssec.3) However, the report is required to contain only criminal history in the commissioner’s possession or to which the commissioner has access.\n(sec.63-ssec.4) The chief executive must examine the report and identify, to the extent it is reasonably practicable to do so, offences involving the use of a weapon or violence against a person.\n(sec.63-ssec.5) The chief executive may give the inspector information in the report about the offences identified under subsection (4) .\n- (a) may be present at a place when the inspector enters the place under part 2 ; and\n- (b) may create an unacceptable level of risk to the inspector’s safety.","sortOrder":67},{"sectionNumber":"sec.64","sectionType":"section","heading":"Criminal history is confidential document","content":"### sec.64 Criminal history is confidential document\n\nA person must not, directly or indirectly, disclose to anyone else a report about a person’s criminal history, or information contained in the report, given under section 63 .\nMaximum penalty—100 penalty units.\nHowever, the person does not contravene subsection (1) if—\nthe disclosure of the report or information is for the purpose of the other person performing a function in relation to this Act; or\nthe disclosure of the report or information is for the purpose of the other person performing a function in relation to a primary Act and the function is substantially the same as a function under this Act; or\nthe disclosure of the report or information is otherwise required or permitted by law.\nThe chief executive or an inspector to whom the report or written information in the report is provided must destroy the report as soon as practicable after the inspector considers the risk mentioned in section 62 .\n(sec.64-ssec.1) A person must not, directly or indirectly, disclose to anyone else a report about a person’s criminal history, or information contained in the report, given under section 63 . Maximum penalty—100 penalty units.\n(sec.64-ssec.2) However, the person does not contravene subsection (1) if— the disclosure of the report or information is for the purpose of the other person performing a function in relation to this Act; or the disclosure of the report or information is for the purpose of the other person performing a function in relation to a primary Act and the function is substantially the same as a function under this Act; or the disclosure of the report or information is otherwise required or permitted by law.\n(sec.64-ssec.3) The chief executive or an inspector to whom the report or written information in the report is provided must destroy the report as soon as practicable after the inspector considers the risk mentioned in section 62 .\n- (a) the disclosure of the report or information is for the purpose of the other person performing a function in relation to this Act; or\n- (b) the disclosure of the report or information is for the purpose of the other person performing a function in relation to a primary Act and the function is substantially the same as a function under this Act; or\n- (c) the disclosure of the report or information is otherwise required or permitted by law.","sortOrder":68},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.5","sectionType":"part","heading":"Miscellaneous provisions relating to inspectors","content":"# Miscellaneous provisions relating to inspectors","sortOrder":69},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.5-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Damage","content":"## Damage","sortOrder":70},{"sectionNumber":"sec.65","sectionType":"section","heading":"Duty to avoid inconvenience and minimise damage","content":"### sec.65 Duty to avoid inconvenience and minimise damage\n\nIn exercising a power, an inspector must take all reasonable steps to cause as little inconvenience, and do as little damage, as possible.\nSee also section 67 .","sortOrder":71},{"sectionNumber":"sec.66","sectionType":"section","heading":"Notice of damage","content":"### sec.66 Notice of damage\n\nThis section applies if—\nan inspector damages something when exercising, or purporting to exercise, a power; or\na person (the assistant ) acting under the direction or authority of an inspector damages something.\nHowever, this section does not apply to damage the inspector reasonably considers is trivial or if the inspector reasonably believes—\nthere is no-one apparently in possession of the thing; or\nthe thing has been abandoned.\nThe inspector must give notice of the damage to the person who appears to the inspector to be an owner, or person in control, of the thing.\nHowever, if for any reason it is not practicable to comply with subsection (3) , the inspector must—\nleave the notice at the place where the damage happened; and\nensure it is left in a conspicuous position and in a reasonably secure way.\nThe inspector may delay complying with subsection (3) or (4) if the inspector reasonably suspects complying with the subsection may frustrate or otherwise hinder the performance of the inspector’s functions.\nThe delay may be only for so long as the inspector continues to have the reasonable suspicion and remains in the vicinity of the place.\nIf the inspector believes the damage was caused by a latent defect in the thing or circumstances beyond the control of the inspector or the assistant the inspector may state the belief in the notice.\nThe notice must state—\nparticulars of the damage; and\nthat the person who suffered the damage may claim compensation under section 67 .\n(sec.66-ssec.1) This section applies if— an inspector damages something when exercising, or purporting to exercise, a power; or a person (the assistant ) acting under the direction or authority of an inspector damages something.\n(sec.66-ssec.2) However, this section does not apply to damage the inspector reasonably considers is trivial or if the inspector reasonably believes— there is no-one apparently in possession of the thing; or the thing has been abandoned.\n(sec.66-ssec.3) The inspector must give notice of the damage to the person who appears to the inspector to be an owner, or person in control, of the thing.\n(sec.66-ssec.4) However, if for any reason it is not practicable to comply with subsection (3) , the inspector must— leave the notice at the place where the damage happened; and ensure it is left in a conspicuous position and in a reasonably secure way.\n(sec.66-ssec.5) The inspector may delay complying with subsection (3) or (4) if the inspector reasonably suspects complying with the subsection may frustrate or otherwise hinder the performance of the inspector’s functions.\n(sec.66-ssec.6) The delay may be only for so long as the inspector continues to have the reasonable suspicion and remains in the vicinity of the place.\n(sec.66-ssec.7) If the inspector believes the damage was caused by a latent defect in the thing or circumstances beyond the control of the inspector or the assistant the inspector may state the belief in the notice.\n(sec.66-ssec.8) The notice must state— particulars of the damage; and that the person who suffered the damage may claim compensation under section 67 .\n- (a) an inspector damages something when exercising, or purporting to exercise, a power; or\n- (b) a person (the assistant ) acting under the direction or authority of an inspector damages something.\n- (a) there is no-one apparently in possession of the thing; or\n- (b) the thing has been abandoned.\n- (a) leave the notice at the place where the damage happened; and\n- (b) ensure it is left in a conspicuous position and in a reasonably secure way.\n- (a) particulars of the damage; and\n- (b) that the person who suffered the damage may claim compensation under section 67 .","sortOrder":72},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.5-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Compensation","content":"## Compensation","sortOrder":73},{"sectionNumber":"sec.67","sectionType":"section","heading":"Compensation","content":"### sec.67 Compensation\n\nA person may claim compensation from the State if the person incurs loss because of the exercise, or purported exercise, of a power by or for an inspector including a loss arising from compliance with a requirement made of the person under this chapter.\nHowever, subsection (1) does not include loss arising from a lawful seizure or a lawful forfeiture.\nThe compensation may be claimed and ordered in a proceeding—\nbrought in a court with jurisdiction for the recovery of the amount of compensation claimed; or\nfor an alleged offence against this Act or a primary Act the investigation of which gave rise to the claim for compensation.\nA court may order the payment of compensation only if it is satisfied it is just to make the order in the circumstances of the particular case.\nIn considering whether it is just to order compensation, the court must have regard to any relevant offence committed by the claimant.\nA regulation may prescribe other matters that may, or must, be taken into account by the court when considering whether it is just to order compensation.\nSection 65 does not provide for a statutory right of compensation other than is provided by this section.\nIn this section—\nloss includes costs and damage.\n(sec.67-ssec.1) A person may claim compensation from the State if the person incurs loss because of the exercise, or purported exercise, of a power by or for an inspector including a loss arising from compliance with a requirement made of the person under this chapter.\n(sec.67-ssec.2) However, subsection (1) does not include loss arising from a lawful seizure or a lawful forfeiture.\n(sec.67-ssec.3) The compensation may be claimed and ordered in a proceeding— brought in a court with jurisdiction for the recovery of the amount of compensation claimed; or for an alleged offence against this Act or a primary Act the investigation of which gave rise to the claim for compensation.\n(sec.67-ssec.4) A court may order the payment of compensation only if it is satisfied it is just to make the order in the circumstances of the particular case.\n(sec.67-ssec.5) In considering whether it is just to order compensation, the court must have regard to any relevant offence committed by the claimant.\n(sec.67-ssec.6) A regulation may prescribe other matters that may, or must, be taken into account by the court when considering whether it is just to order compensation.\n(sec.67-ssec.7) Section 65 does not provide for a statutory right of compensation other than is provided by this section.\n(sec.67-ssec.8) In this section— loss includes costs and damage.\n- (a) brought in a court with jurisdiction for the recovery of the amount of compensation claimed; or\n- (b) for an alleged offence against this Act or a primary Act the investigation of which gave rise to the claim for compensation.","sortOrder":74},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.5-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Other offences relating to inspectors","content":"## Other offences relating to inspectors","sortOrder":75},{"sectionNumber":"sec.68","sectionType":"section","heading":"Giving inspector false or misleading information","content":"### sec.68 Giving inspector false or misleading information\n\nA person must not, in relation to the administration of this Act or a primary Act, give an inspector information, or a document containing information, that the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment.\nSubsection (1) applies to information or a document given in relation to the administration of this Act or a primary Act whether or not the information or document was given in response to a specific power under this Act or the primary Act.\n(sec.68-ssec.1) A person must not, in relation to the administration of this Act or a primary Act, give an inspector information, or a document containing information, that the person knows is false or misleading in a material particular. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units or 2 years imprisonment.\n(sec.68-ssec.2) Subsection (1) applies to information or a document given in relation to the administration of this Act or a primary Act whether or not the information or document was given in response to a specific power under this Act or the primary Act.","sortOrder":76},{"sectionNumber":"sec.69","sectionType":"section","heading":"Obstructing inspector","content":"### sec.69 Obstructing inspector\n\nA person must not obstruct an inspector exercising a power, or someone helping an inspector exercising a power, unless the person has a reasonable excuse.\nMaximum penalty—200 penalty units or 1 year’s imprisonment.\nIf a person has obstructed an inspector, or someone helping an inspector, and the inspector decides to proceed with the exercise of the power, the inspector must warn the person that—\nit is an offence to cause an obstruction unless the person has a reasonable excuse; and\nthe inspector considers the person’s conduct an obstruction.\nIn this section—\nobstruct includes assault, hinder, resist, attempt to obstruct and threaten to obstruct.\npower means a power under this Act or a primary Act.\n(sec.69-ssec.1) A person must not obstruct an inspector exercising a power, or someone helping an inspector exercising a power, unless the person has a reasonable excuse. Maximum penalty—200 penalty units or 1 year’s imprisonment.\n(sec.69-ssec.2) If a person has obstructed an inspector, or someone helping an inspector, and the inspector decides to proceed with the exercise of the power, the inspector must warn the person that— it is an offence to cause an obstruction unless the person has a reasonable excuse; and the inspector considers the person’s conduct an obstruction.\n(sec.69-ssec.3) In this section— obstruct includes assault, hinder, resist, attempt to obstruct and threaten to obstruct. power means a power under this Act or a primary Act.\n- (a) it is an offence to cause an obstruction unless the person has a reasonable excuse; and\n- (b) the inspector considers the person’s conduct an obstruction.","sortOrder":77},{"sectionNumber":"sec.70","sectionType":"section","heading":"Impersonating inspector","content":"### sec.70 Impersonating inspector\n\nA person must not impersonate an inspector.\nMaximum penalty—80 penalty units.","sortOrder":78},{"sectionNumber":"ch.2-pt.5-div.4","sectionType":"division","heading":"Other provisions","content":"## Other provisions","sortOrder":79},{"sectionNumber":"sec.71","sectionType":"section","heading":"Evidential immunity for individuals complying with particular requirements","content":"### sec.71 Evidential immunity for individuals complying with particular requirements\n\nSubsection (2) applies if an individual gives or produces information or a document to an inspector under section 39 or 57 .\nEvidence of the information or document, and other evidence directly or indirectly derived from the information or document, is not admissible against the individual in any proceeding to the extent it tends to incriminate the individual, or expose the individual to a penalty, in the proceeding.\nSubsection (2) does not apply to a proceeding about the false or misleading nature of the information or anything in the document or in which the false or misleading nature of the information or document is relevant evidence.\n(sec.71-ssec.1) Subsection (2) applies if an individual gives or produces information or a document to an inspector under section 39 or 57 .\n(sec.71-ssec.2) Evidence of the information or document, and other evidence directly or indirectly derived from the information or document, is not admissible against the individual in any proceeding to the extent it tends to incriminate the individual, or expose the individual to a penalty, in the proceeding.\n(sec.71-ssec.3) Subsection (2) does not apply to a proceeding about the false or misleading nature of the information or anything in the document or in which the false or misleading nature of the information or document is relevant evidence.","sortOrder":80},{"sectionNumber":"ch.3-pt.1","sectionType":"part","heading":"Reviews and appeals","content":"# Reviews and appeals","sortOrder":81},{"sectionNumber":"ch.3-pt.1-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Right of appeal","content":"## Right of appeal","sortOrder":82},{"sectionNumber":"sec.72","sectionType":"section","heading":"Right of appeal","content":"### sec.72 Right of appeal\n\nA person who has a right to be given an information notice about a decision made under this Act has a right to appeal against the decision.","sortOrder":83},{"sectionNumber":"ch.3-pt.1-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Internal review of decisions","content":"## Internal review of decisions","sortOrder":84},{"sectionNumber":"sec.73","sectionType":"section","heading":"Appeal process starts with internal review","content":"### sec.73 Appeal process starts with internal review\n\nEvery appeal against a decision must be, in the first instance, by way of an application for an internal review.\nA person who has a right to appeal against a decision may apply to the chief executive for a review of the decision.\n(sec.73-ssec.1) Every appeal against a decision must be, in the first instance, by way of an application for an internal review.\n(sec.73-ssec.2) A person who has a right to appeal against a decision may apply to the chief executive for a review of the decision.","sortOrder":85},{"sectionNumber":"sec.74","sectionType":"section","heading":"How to apply for review","content":"### sec.74 How to apply for review\n\nAn application for review of a decision must be—\nin the approved form; and\nsupported by enough information to enable the chief executive to decide the application.\nThe application must be made within 20 business days after—\nthe day the person is given the information notice about the decision; or\nif the person is not given an information notice about the decision—the day the person otherwise becomes aware of the decision.\nThe chief executive may extend the period for applying for the review.\nThe application must not be dealt with by—\nthe person who made the decision; or\na person in a less senior office than the person who made the decision.\nSubsection (4) —\napplies despite the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 27A ; and\ndoes not apply to a decision made by the chief executive.\n(sec.74-ssec.1) An application for review of a decision must be— in the approved form; and supported by enough information to enable the chief executive to decide the application.\n(sec.74-ssec.2) The application must be made within 20 business days after— the day the person is given the information notice about the decision; or if the person is not given an information notice about the decision—the day the person otherwise becomes aware of the decision.\n(sec.74-ssec.3) The chief executive may extend the period for applying for the review.\n(sec.74-ssec.4) The application must not be dealt with by— the person who made the decision; or a person in a less senior office than the person who made the decision.\n(sec.74-ssec.5) Subsection (4) — applies despite the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 27A ; and does not apply to a decision made by the chief executive.\n- (a) in the approved form; and\n- (b) supported by enough information to enable the chief executive to decide the application.\n- (a) the day the person is given the information notice about the decision; or\n- (b) if the person is not given an information notice about the decision—the day the person otherwise becomes aware of the decision.\n- (a) the person who made the decision; or\n- (b) a person in a less senior office than the person who made the decision.\n- (a) applies despite the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 27A ; and\n- (b) does not apply to a decision made by the chief executive.","sortOrder":86},{"sectionNumber":"sec.75","sectionType":"section","heading":"Stay of operation of decision","content":"### sec.75 Stay of operation of decision\n\nAn application for review of a decision does not stay the decision.\nHowever, the applicant may immediately apply for a stay of the decision to a Magistrates Court.\nThe court may stay the decision to secure the effectiveness of the review and a later appeal to the court.\nThe stay—\nmay be given on conditions the court considers appropriate; and\noperates for the period fixed by the court; and\nmay be amended or revoked by the court.\nThe period of the stay must not extend past the time when the chief executive makes a review decision about the decision and any later period the court allows the applicant to enable the applicant to appeal against the review decision.\nAn application for review of a decision affects the decision, or carrying out of the decision, only if the decision is stayed.\n(sec.75-ssec.1) An application for review of a decision does not stay the decision.\n(sec.75-ssec.2) However, the applicant may immediately apply for a stay of the decision to a Magistrates Court.\n(sec.75-ssec.3) The court may stay the decision to secure the effectiveness of the review and a later appeal to the court.\n(sec.75-ssec.4) The stay— may be given on conditions the court considers appropriate; and operates for the period fixed by the court; and may be amended or revoked by the court.\n(sec.75-ssec.5) The period of the stay must not extend past the time when the chief executive makes a review decision about the decision and any later period the court allows the applicant to enable the applicant to appeal against the review decision.\n(sec.75-ssec.6) An application for review of a decision affects the decision, or carrying out of the decision, only if the decision is stayed.\n- (a) may be given on conditions the court considers appropriate; and\n- (b) operates for the period fixed by the court; and\n- (c) may be amended or revoked by the court.","sortOrder":87},{"sectionNumber":"sec.76","sectionType":"section","heading":"Review decision","content":"### sec.76 Review decision\n\nThe chief executive must, within 30 business days after receiving the application—\nreview the decision (the original decision ); and\nmake a decision (the review decision ) to—\nconfirm the original decision; or\namend the original decision; or\nsubstitute another decision for the original decision; and\ngive the applicant notice (the review notice ) of the review decision.\nIf the review decision is not the decision sought by the applicant, the review notice must state the following—\nthe day the notice is given to the applicant (the review notice day );\nthe reasons for the decision;\nthat the applicant may appeal against the decision to a Magistrates Court within 28 days after the review notice day;\nhow to appeal;\nthat the applicant may apply to the court for a stay of the decision.\nIf the chief executive does not give the review notice within the 30 days, the chief executive is taken to have made a review decision confirming the original decision.\n(sec.76-ssec.1) The chief executive must, within 30 business days after receiving the application— review the decision (the original decision ); and make a decision (the review decision ) to— confirm the original decision; or amend the original decision; or substitute another decision for the original decision; and give the applicant notice (the review notice ) of the review decision.\n(sec.76-ssec.2) If the review decision is not the decision sought by the applicant, the review notice must state the following— the day the notice is given to the applicant (the review notice day ); the reasons for the decision; that the applicant may appeal against the decision to a Magistrates Court within 28 days after the review notice day; how to appeal; that the applicant may apply to the court for a stay of the decision.\n(sec.76-ssec.3) If the chief executive does not give the review notice within the 30 days, the chief executive is taken to have made a review decision confirming the original decision.\n- (a) review the decision (the original decision ); and\n- (b) make a decision (the review decision ) to— (i) confirm the original decision; or (ii) amend the original decision; or (iii) substitute another decision for the original decision; and\n- (i) confirm the original decision; or\n- (ii) amend the original decision; or\n- (iii) substitute another decision for the original decision; and\n- (c) give the applicant notice (the review notice ) of the review decision.\n- (i) confirm the original decision; or\n- (ii) amend the original decision; or\n- (iii) substitute another decision for the original decision; and\n- (a) the day the notice is given to the applicant (the review notice day );\n- (b) the reasons for the decision;\n- (c) that the applicant may appeal against the decision to a Magistrates Court within 28 days after the review notice day;\n- (d) how to appeal;\n- (e) that the applicant may apply to the court for a stay of the decision.","sortOrder":88},{"sectionNumber":"ch.3-pt.1-div.3","sectionType":"division","heading":"Appeals","content":"## Appeals","sortOrder":89},{"sectionNumber":"sec.77","sectionType":"section","heading":"Who may appeal","content":"### sec.77 Who may appeal\n\nA person who has applied for review of an original decision and is dissatisfied with the review decision may appeal to a Magistrates Court against the decision.","sortOrder":90},{"sectionNumber":"sec.78","sectionType":"section","heading":"Procedure for an appeal to the court","content":"### sec.78 Procedure for an appeal to the court\n\nAn appeal to the court is started by filing notice of appeal with the clerk of the court.\nA copy of the notice must be served on the chief executive.\nThe notice of appeal must be filed—\nif the chief executive gave a review notice of the review decision to the applicant within the 30 business days mentioned in section 76 (1) —within 28 days after the review notice day; or\notherwise—within 28 days after the end of the 30 business days mentioned in section 76 (1) .\nThe court may, whether before or after the time for filing the notice of appeal ends, extend the period for filing the notice of appeal.\nThe notice of appeal must state fully the grounds of the appeal.\n(sec.78-ssec.1) An appeal to the court is started by filing notice of appeal with the clerk of the court.\n(sec.78-ssec.2) A copy of the notice must be served on the chief executive.\n(sec.78-ssec.3) The notice of appeal must be filed— if the chief executive gave a review notice of the review decision to the applicant within the 30 business days mentioned in section 76 (1) —within 28 days after the review notice day; or otherwise—within 28 days after the end of the 30 business days mentioned in section 76 (1) .\n(sec.78-ssec.4) The court may, whether before or after the time for filing the notice of appeal ends, extend the period for filing the notice of appeal.\n(sec.78-ssec.5) The notice of appeal must state fully the grounds of the appeal.\n- (a) if the chief executive gave a review notice of the review decision to the applicant within the 30 business days mentioned in section 76 (1) —within 28 days after the review notice day; or\n- (b) otherwise—within 28 days after the end of the 30 business days mentioned in section 76 (1) .","sortOrder":91},{"sectionNumber":"sec.79","sectionType":"section","heading":"Stay of operation of review decision","content":"### sec.79 Stay of operation of review decision\n\nThe court may grant a stay of the operation of a review decision appealed against to secure the effectiveness of the appeal.\nA stay—\nmay be granted on conditions the court considers appropriate; and\noperates for the period fixed by the court; and\nmay be amended or revoked by the court.\nThe period of a stay stated by the court must not extend past the time when the court decides the appeal.\nAn appeal against a decision affects the decision, or the carrying out of the decision, only if the decision is stayed.\n(sec.79-ssec.1) The court may grant a stay of the operation of a review decision appealed against to secure the effectiveness of the appeal.\n(sec.79-ssec.2) A stay— may be granted on conditions the court considers appropriate; and operates for the period fixed by the court; and may be amended or revoked by the court.\n(sec.79-ssec.3) The period of a stay stated by the court must not extend past the time when the court decides the appeal.\n(sec.79-ssec.4) An appeal against a decision affects the decision, or the carrying out of the decision, only if the decision is stayed.\n- (a) may be granted on conditions the court considers appropriate; and\n- (b) operates for the period fixed by the court; and\n- (c) may be amended or revoked by the court.","sortOrder":92},{"sectionNumber":"sec.80","sectionType":"section","heading":"Powers of court on appeal","content":"### sec.80 Powers of court on appeal\n\nIn deciding an appeal, the court—\nhas the same powers as the chief executive in making the review decision appealed against; and\nis not bound by the rules of evidence; and\nmust comply with natural justice.\nAn appeal is by way of rehearing.\nThe court may—\nconfirm the review decision; or\nset aside the review decision and substitute another decision; or\nset aside the review decision and return the matter to the chief executive with directions the court considers appropriate.\n(sec.80-ssec.1) In deciding an appeal, the court— has the same powers as the chief executive in making the review decision appealed against; and is not bound by the rules of evidence; and must comply with natural justice.\n(sec.80-ssec.2) An appeal is by way of rehearing.\n(sec.80-ssec.3) The court may— confirm the review decision; or set aside the review decision and substitute another decision; or set aside the review decision and return the matter to the chief executive with directions the court considers appropriate.\n- (a) has the same powers as the chief executive in making the review decision appealed against; and\n- (b) is not bound by the rules of evidence; and\n- (c) must comply with natural justice.\n- (a) confirm the review decision; or\n- (b) set aside the review decision and substitute another decision; or\n- (c) set aside the review decision and return the matter to the chief executive with directions the court considers appropriate.","sortOrder":93},{"sectionNumber":"sec.81","sectionType":"section","heading":"Effect of decision of court on appeal","content":"### sec.81 Effect of decision of court on appeal\n\nIf the court acts to set aside the review decision and return the matter to the chief executive with directions the court considers appropriate, and the chief executive makes a new decision, the new decision is not subject to review or appeal under this part.\nIf the court substitutes another decision, the substituted decision is taken to be the decision of the chief executive, and the chief executive may give effect to the decision as if the decision was the original decision of the chief executive and no application for review or appeal had been made.\n(sec.81-ssec.1) If the court acts to set aside the review decision and return the matter to the chief executive with directions the court considers appropriate, and the chief executive makes a new decision, the new decision is not subject to review or appeal under this part.\n(sec.81-ssec.2) If the court substitutes another decision, the substituted decision is taken to be the decision of the chief executive, and the chief executive may give effect to the decision as if the decision was the original decision of the chief executive and no application for review or appeal had been made.","sortOrder":94},{"sectionNumber":"ch.3-pt.2","sectionType":"part","heading":"Evidence and legal proceedings","content":"# Evidence and legal proceedings","sortOrder":95},{"sectionNumber":"ch.3-pt.2-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Evidentiary provisions","content":"## Evidentiary provisions","sortOrder":96},{"sectionNumber":"sec.82","sectionType":"section","heading":"Application of div 1","content":"### sec.82 Application of div 1\n\nThis division applies to a proceeding under this Act.","sortOrder":97},{"sectionNumber":"sec.83","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authority","content":"### sec.83 Authority\n\nThe power of the chief executive or an inspector to do anything under this Act must be presumed unless a party to the proceeding, by reasonable notice, requires proof of it.","sortOrder":98},{"sectionNumber":"sec.84","sectionType":"section","heading":"Signatures","content":"### sec.84 Signatures\n\nA signature purporting to be the signature of the chief executive or an inspector is evidence of the signature it purports to be.","sortOrder":99},{"sectionNumber":"sec.85","sectionType":"section","heading":"Other evidentiary aids","content":"### sec.85 Other evidentiary aids\n\nA certificate purporting to be signed by the chief executive stating any of the following matters is evidence of the matter—\nthat a stated document of any of the following types is a document given, issued, kept or made under this Act—\nan appointment, approval or decision;\na direction or requirement;\na notice or other document given under this Act;\nthat a stated document is another document kept under this Act;\nthat a stated document is a copy of, or an extract from or part of, a thing mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) ;\nthat on a stated day—\na stated person was given a stated decision, direction or notice under this Act; or\na stated requirement under this Act was made of a stated person;\nthat a stated amount is payable under this Act by a stated person and has not been paid.\n- (a) that a stated document of any of the following types is a document given, issued, kept or made under this Act— (i) an appointment, approval or decision; (ii) a direction or requirement; (iii) a notice or other document given under this Act;\n- (i) an appointment, approval or decision;\n- (ii) a direction or requirement;\n- (iii) a notice or other document given under this Act;\n- (b) that a stated document is another document kept under this Act;\n- (c) that a stated document is a copy of, or an extract from or part of, a thing mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) ;\n- (d) that on a stated day— (i) a stated person was given a stated decision, direction or notice under this Act; or (ii) a stated requirement under this Act was made of a stated person;\n- (i) a stated person was given a stated decision, direction or notice under this Act; or\n- (ii) a stated requirement under this Act was made of a stated person;\n- (e) that a stated amount is payable under this Act by a stated person and has not been paid.\n- (i) an appointment, approval or decision;\n- (ii) a direction or requirement;\n- (iii) a notice or other document given under this Act;\n- (i) a stated person was given a stated decision, direction or notice under this Act; or\n- (ii) a stated requirement under this Act was made of a stated person;","sortOrder":100},{"sectionNumber":"ch.3-pt.2-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"Offence proceedings","content":"## Offence proceedings","sortOrder":101},{"sectionNumber":"sec.86","sectionType":"section","heading":"Offences under Act are summary","content":"### sec.86 Offences under Act are summary\n\nAn offence against this Act is a summary offence.\nA proceeding for an offence against this Act must start within the later of the following periods to end—\n1 year after the commission of the offence;\n6 months after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge but within 2 years after the commission of the offence.\n(sec.86-ssec.1) An offence against this Act is a summary offence.\n(sec.86-ssec.2) A proceeding for an offence against this Act must start within the later of the following periods to end— 1 year after the commission of the offence; 6 months after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge but within 2 years after the commission of the offence.\n- (a) 1 year after the commission of the offence;\n- (b) 6 months after the offence comes to the complainant’s knowledge but within 2 years after the commission of the offence.","sortOrder":102},{"sectionNumber":"sec.87","sectionType":"section","heading":"Statement of complainant’s knowledge","content":"### sec.87 Statement of complainant’s knowledge\n\nIn a complaint starting a proceeding for an offence against this Act, a statement that the matter of the complaint came to the complainant’s knowledge on a stated day is evidence the matter came to the complainant’s knowledge on that day.","sortOrder":103},{"sectionNumber":"ch.5-pt.1","sectionType":"part","heading":"Purposes, definitions and general approach","content":"# Purposes, definitions and general approach","sortOrder":104},{"sectionNumber":"sec.95","sectionType":"section","heading":"Main purposes of ch 5","content":"### sec.95 Main purposes of ch 5\n\nThe main purposes of this chapter are—\nto provide for provisions of this Act that are substantially the same as repealed provisions of a primary Act to be dealt with as replacements of the repealed provisions; and\nwithout limiting paragraph (a), if matters relating to the appointment and powers of inspectors for a primary Act, and the procedures relating to the exercise of the powers, were dealt with in a primary Act, to provide for the continuation of the matters under this Act.\n- (a) to provide for provisions of this Act that are substantially the same as repealed provisions of a primary Act to be dealt with as replacements of the repealed provisions; and\n- (b) without limiting paragraph (a), if matters relating to the appointment and powers of inspectors for a primary Act, and the procedures relating to the exercise of the powers, were dealt with in a primary Act, to provide for the continuation of the matters under this Act.","sortOrder":105},{"sectionNumber":"sec.96","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions for ch 5","content":"### sec.96 Definitions for ch 5\n\nIn this chapter—\n2014 primary Act means—\nthe Agents Financial Administration Act 2014 ; or\nthe Debt Collectors (Field Agents and Collection Agents) Act 2014 ; or\nthe Motor Dealers and Chattel Auctioneers Act 2014 ; or\nthe Property Occupations Act 2014 .\ncommencement means the day this section commences.\ncorresponding provision , for a previous provision of a primary Act, means a provision of this Act that is substantially the same as the previous provision of the primary Act.\nmade includes given and issued.\nobligation includes duty.\nprevious , in relation to a stated provision of a primary Act that includes a number, means the provision of the primary Act with that number immediately before the commencement, if the provision is repealed under this Act.\nprevious provision , of a primary Act, means—\nfor a primary Act other than a 2014 primary Act—a provision of the primary Act, as in force immediately before the commencement, if the provision is repealed under this Act; or\notherwise—a provision of the repealed Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000 , as in force immediately before its repeal under the Property Occupations Act 2014 .\nprotection includes a statement to the effect of any of the following—\nthat there is no liability;\nthat there is no invalidity;\nthat a person has an entitlement.\n- (a) the Agents Financial Administration Act 2014 ; or\n- (b) the Debt Collectors (Field Agents and Collection Agents) Act 2014 ; or\n- (c) the Motor Dealers and Chattel Auctioneers Act 2014 ; or\n- (d) the Property Occupations Act 2014 .\n- (a) for a primary Act other than a 2014 primary Act—a provision of the primary Act, as in force immediately before the commencement, if the provision is repealed under this Act; or\n- (b) otherwise—a provision of the repealed Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000 , as in force immediately before its repeal under the Property Occupations Act 2014 .\n- (a) that there is no liability;\n- (b) that there is no invalidity;\n- (c) that a person has an entitlement.","sortOrder":106},{"sectionNumber":"sec.97","sectionType":"section","heading":"References to primary Act for ch 5","content":"### sec.97 References to primary Act for ch 5\n\nA reference in this chapter to a primary Act may, if the context permits, be taken to include a reference to the repealed Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000 .","sortOrder":107},{"sectionNumber":"sec.98","sectionType":"section","heading":"Document, action, obligation or protection under previous provision of primary Act","content":"### sec.98 Document, action, obligation or protection under previous provision of primary Act\n\nThis section applies to any of the following—\na document made or kept under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the document) if the document continued to have effect or was in force immediately before the commencement;\nan action done under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the action) if the action continued to have effect immediately before the commencement;\nan entity’s obligation under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the obligation) if the obligation applied to the entity immediately before the commencement;\nan entity’s protection under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the protection) that applied to the entity immediately before the commencement.\nSubject to a specific provision of this Act in relation to the document, action, obligation or protection, if there is a corresponding provision for the relevant previous provision for the document, action, obligation or protection, the document, action, obligation or protection—\ncontinues in force or to have effect according to its terms; and\nmay be taken to have been made, kept or done under the corresponding provision.\nSubsection (2)(b) applies whether or not the relevant previous provision refers to the document, action, obligation or protection by reference to a provision of the primary Act.\nOther provisions of this part include examples of the operation of this section.\n(sec.98-ssec.1) This section applies to any of the following— a document made or kept under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the document) if the document continued to have effect or was in force immediately before the commencement; an action done under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the action) if the action continued to have effect immediately before the commencement; an entity’s obligation under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the obligation) if the obligation applied to the entity immediately before the commencement; an entity’s protection under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the protection) that applied to the entity immediately before the commencement.\n(sec.98-ssec.2) Subject to a specific provision of this Act in relation to the document, action, obligation or protection, if there is a corresponding provision for the relevant previous provision for the document, action, obligation or protection, the document, action, obligation or protection— continues in force or to have effect according to its terms; and may be taken to have been made, kept or done under the corresponding provision.\n(sec.98-ssec.3) Subsection (2)(b) applies whether or not the relevant previous provision refers to the document, action, obligation or protection by reference to a provision of the primary Act.\n(sec.98-ssec.4) Other provisions of this part include examples of the operation of this section.\n- (a) a document made or kept under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the document) if the document continued to have effect or was in force immediately before the commencement;\n- (b) an action done under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the action) if the action continued to have effect immediately before the commencement;\n- (c) an entity’s obligation under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the obligation) if the obligation applied to the entity immediately before the commencement;\n- (d) an entity’s protection under a previous provision of a primary Act (the relevant previous provision for the protection) that applied to the entity immediately before the commencement.\n- (a) continues in force or to have effect according to its terms; and\n- (b) may be taken to have been made, kept or done under the corresponding provision.","sortOrder":108},{"sectionNumber":"sec.99","sectionType":"section","heading":"Terminology in things mentioned in s 98(1)","content":"### sec.99 Terminology in things mentioned in s 98(1)\n\nThis section applies to a document (the relevant document ) that is—\na document as mentioned in section 98(1); or\nevidence of a document, action, obligation or protection as mentioned in section 98(1).\nA reference in the relevant document to a document, action, obligation or protection as mentioned in section 98(1) is to be read, if the context permits and with the necessary changes to terminology, as if the document, action, obligation or protection were made, kept or done under this Act.\nAn instrument of appointment given under a primary Act by the chief executive to an inspector limiting the powers of the inspector is to be read as if the instrument limited the powers of the inspector under this Act.\n(sec.99-ssec.1) This section applies to a document (the relevant document ) that is— a document as mentioned in section 98(1); or evidence of a document, action, obligation or protection as mentioned in section 98(1).\n(sec.99-ssec.2) A reference in the relevant document to a document, action, obligation or protection as mentioned in section 98(1) is to be read, if the context permits and with the necessary changes to terminology, as if the document, action, obligation or protection were made, kept or done under this Act. An instrument of appointment given under a primary Act by the chief executive to an inspector limiting the powers of the inspector is to be read as if the instrument limited the powers of the inspector under this Act.\n- (a) a document as mentioned in section 98(1); or\n- (b) evidence of a document, action, obligation or protection as mentioned in section 98(1).","sortOrder":109},{"sectionNumber":"sec.100","sectionType":"section","heading":"Period stated in previous provision","content":"### sec.100 Period stated in previous provision\n\nThis section applies if, in a previous provision of a primary Act, there is a period for doing something, and the period for doing the thing started but did not finish before the commencement.\nIf there is a corresponding provision to the previous provision of the primary Act and both the corresponding provision and the previous provision provide for the same period, the period for doing the thing continues to have started from when the period started under the previous provision but ends under the corresponding provision.\n(sec.100-ssec.1) This section applies if, in a previous provision of a primary Act, there is a period for doing something, and the period for doing the thing started but did not finish before the commencement.\n(sec.100-ssec.2) If there is a corresponding provision to the previous provision of the primary Act and both the corresponding provision and the previous provision provide for the same period, the period for doing the thing continues to have started from when the period started under the previous provision but ends under the corresponding provision.","sortOrder":110},{"sectionNumber":"sec.101","sectionType":"section","heading":"Period or date stated in document given under previous provision","content":"### sec.101 Period or date stated in document given under previous provision\n\nThis section applies if—\nthere was a previous provision of a primary Act that provided for a document to be made under it; and\nthere is a corresponding provision to the previous provision of the primary Act; and\nunder the previous provision and before the commencement, a document was given to a person, whether or not the person had received the document before the commencement.\na notice under the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 127 , that states a period within which a person who is in control of a thing to be seized must take the thing to a place stated in the notice\nIf the document stated a period for doing something—\nthe stated period continues to apply for doing the thing; and\nthe period continues to have started from when the period started under the previous provision of the primary Act.\nIf the document stated a day before which, or by which, a thing is to be done (however expressed), the thing must be done by the stated day.\n(sec.101-ssec.1) This section applies if— there was a previous provision of a primary Act that provided for a document to be made under it; and there is a corresponding provision to the previous provision of the primary Act; and under the previous provision and before the commencement, a document was given to a person, whether or not the person had received the document before the commencement. a notice under the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 127 , that states a period within which a person who is in control of a thing to be seized must take the thing to a place stated in the notice\n(sec.101-ssec.2) If the document stated a period for doing something— the stated period continues to apply for doing the thing; and the period continues to have started from when the period started under the previous provision of the primary Act.\n(sec.101-ssec.3) If the document stated a day before which, or by which, a thing is to be done (however expressed), the thing must be done by the stated day.\n- (a) there was a previous provision of a primary Act that provided for a document to be made under it; and\n- (b) there is a corresponding provision to the previous provision of the primary Act; and\n- (c) under the previous provision and before the commencement, a document was given to a person, whether or not the person had received the document before the commencement. Example for paragraph (c)— a notice under the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 127 , that states a period within which a person who is in control of a thing to be seized must take the thing to a place stated in the notice\n- (a) the stated period continues to apply for doing the thing; and\n- (b) the period continues to have started from when the period started under the previous provision of the primary Act.","sortOrder":111},{"sectionNumber":"sec.102","sectionType":"section","heading":"Action happening before commencement may be relevant to proceeding for particular acts or omissions","content":"### sec.102 Action happening before commencement may be relevant to proceeding for particular acts or omissions\n\nAn action as mentioned in section 98(1) happening before the commencement may be relevant to a proceeding relating to a contravention of a provision of this Act involving an act or omission that happened after the commencement.\nThis section does not limit the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 20C .\nIn this section—\ncontravention includes an alleged contravention.\n(sec.102-ssec.1) An action as mentioned in section 98(1) happening before the commencement may be relevant to a proceeding relating to a contravention of a provision of this Act involving an act or omission that happened after the commencement.\n(sec.102-ssec.2) This section does not limit the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 20C .\n(sec.102-ssec.3) In this section— contravention includes an alleged contravention.","sortOrder":112},{"sectionNumber":"sec.103","sectionType":"section","heading":"Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , s 20 not limited","content":"### sec.103 Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , s 20 not limited\n\nThis chapter does not limit the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 , section 20 .","sortOrder":113},{"sectionNumber":"ch.5-pt.2","sectionType":"part","heading":"Transitional provisions relating to particular provisions of primary Acts","content":"# Transitional provisions relating to particular provisions of primary Acts","sortOrder":114},{"sectionNumber":"ch.5-pt.2-div.1","sectionType":"division","heading":"Examples for chapter 2","content":"## Examples for chapter 2","sortOrder":115},{"sectionNumber":"sec.104","sectionType":"section","heading":"Examples for ch 2 of documents under s 98","content":"### sec.104 Examples for ch 2 of documents under s 98\n\nFor the operation of chapter 2, the following are examples of documents as mentioned in section 98(1)(a) in relation to matters dealt with under a primary Act—\nan acknowledgement given under a previous provision of a primary Act of consent for an inspector to enter a place;\nthe Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 114\nthe Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 83\na warrant issued under a previous provision of a primary Act;\nthe Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 116\nthe Retirement Villages Act 1999 , previous section 142\nthe Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 85\na notice under a previous provision of a primary Act requiring a person to take a thing to be seized to a stated place;\nthe Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 127\na notice under a previous provision of a primary Act requiring a person to give information;\nthe Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 133\na receipt for a seized thing under a previous provision of a primary Act;\nthe Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 91\nthe Tourism Services Act 2003 , previous section 55\nan information notice under a previous provision of a primary Act.\na QCAT information notice under the Tourism Services Act 2003 , previous section 56\ns 104 amd 2014 No. 30 s 63 sch 1\n- (a) an acknowledgement given under a previous provision of a primary Act of consent for an inspector to enter a place; Examples of previous provisions— • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 114 • the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 83\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 114\n- • the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 83\n- (b) a warrant issued under a previous provision of a primary Act; Examples of previous provisions— • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 116 • the Retirement Villages Act 1999 , previous section 142 • the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 85\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 116\n- • the Retirement Villages Act 1999 , previous section 142\n- • the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 85\n- (c) a notice under a previous provision of a primary Act requiring a person to take a thing to be seized to a stated place; Example of previous provision— the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 127\n- (d) a notice under a previous provision of a primary Act requiring a person to give information; Example of previous provision— the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 133\n- (e) a receipt for a seized thing under a previous provision of a primary Act; Examples of previous provisions— • the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 91 • the Tourism Services Act 2003 , previous section 55\n- • the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 91\n- • the Tourism Services Act 2003 , previous section 55\n- (f) an information notice under a previous provision of a primary Act. Example of previous provision— a QCAT information notice under the Tourism Services Act 2003 , previous section 56\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 114\n- • the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 83\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 116\n- • the Retirement Villages Act 1999 , previous section 142\n- • the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 85\n- • the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 , previous section 91\n- • the Tourism Services Act 2003 , previous section 55","sortOrder":116},{"sectionNumber":"sec.105","sectionType":"section","heading":"Examples for ch 2 of obligations under s 98","content":"### sec.105 Examples for ch 2 of obligations under s 98\n\nFor the operation of chapter 2, the following are examples of an obligation as mentioned in section 98(1)(c) in relation to matters dealt with under a primary Act—\nan obligation under a previous provision of a primary Act for an inspector to give notice of the particulars of damage to anything;\nthe Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 123\nthe Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 137\nthe Tourism Services Act 2003 , previous section 63\nan obligation under a previous provision of a primary Act to return a seized thing to the person from whom it is seized or its owner;\nthe Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30H (3)\nthe Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 120\nthe Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 130\nthe Security Providers Act 1993 , previous section 39\nan obligation under a previous provision of a primary Act to allow an owner of a seized thing to inspect the thing;\nthe Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30H (2)\nthe Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 121\nthe Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 131\na requirement under a previous provision of a primary Act to make a particular document available for inspection;\nthe Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 122\nthe Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 134\na requirement under a previous provision of a primary Act to take a thing to be seized to a stated place.\nthe Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 127\n- (a) an obligation under a previous provision of a primary Act for an inspector to give notice of the particulars of damage to anything; Examples of previous provisions— • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 123 • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 137 • the Tourism Services Act 2003 , previous section 63\n- • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 123\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 137\n- • the Tourism Services Act 2003 , previous section 63\n- (b) an obligation under a previous provision of a primary Act to return a seized thing to the person from whom it is seized or its owner; Examples of previous provisions— • the Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30H (3) • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 120 • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 130 • the Security Providers Act 1993 , previous section 39\n- • the Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30H (3)\n- • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 120\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 130\n- • the Security Providers Act 1993 , previous section 39\n- (c) an obligation under a previous provision of a primary Act to allow an owner of a seized thing to inspect the thing; Examples of previous provisions— • the Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30H (2) • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 121 • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 131\n- • the Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30H (2)\n- • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 121\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 131\n- (d) a requirement under a previous provision of a primary Act to make a particular document available for inspection; Examples of previous provisions— • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 122 • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 134\n- • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 122\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 134\n- (e) a requirement under a previous provision of a primary Act to take a thing to be seized to a stated place. Example of previous provision— the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 127\n- • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 123\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 137\n- • the Tourism Services Act 2003 , previous section 63\n- • the Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30H (3)\n- • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 120\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 130\n- • the Security Providers Act 1993 , previous section 39\n- • the Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30H (2)\n- • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 121\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 131\n- • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 122\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 134","sortOrder":117},{"sectionNumber":"sec.106","sectionType":"section","heading":"Examples for ch 2 of protections under s 98","content":"### sec.106 Examples for ch 2 of protections under s 98\n\nFor the operation of chapter 2, the following are examples of a protection as mentioned in section 98(1)(d) in relation to matters dealt with under a primary Act—\na statement in a previous provision of a primary Act that particular information or a particular document is not admissible in evidence against an individual in any criminal proceedings;\nthe Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30F (5)\na right for a person to claim compensation under a previous provision of a primary Act.\nthe Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30J\nthe Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 124\nthe Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 138\nthe Retirement Villages Act 1999 , previous section 152\nthe Security Providers Act 1993 , previous section 46\ns 106 amd 2014 No. 30 s 63 sch 1\n- (a) a statement in a previous provision of a primary Act that particular information or a particular document is not admissible in evidence against an individual in any criminal proceedings; Example of previous provision— the Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30F (5)\n- (b) a right for a person to claim compensation under a previous provision of a primary Act. Examples of previous provisions— • the Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30J • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 124 • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 138 • the Retirement Villages Act 1999 , previous section 152 • the Security Providers Act 1993 , previous section 46\n- • the Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30J\n- • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 124\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 138\n- • the Retirement Villages Act 1999 , previous section 152\n- • the Security Providers Act 1993 , previous section 46\n- • the Land Sales Act 1984 , previous section 30J\n- • the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 , previous section 124\n- • the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 , previous section 138\n- • the Retirement Villages Act 1999 , previous section 152\n- • the Security Providers Act 1993 , previous section 46","sortOrder":118},{"sectionNumber":"ch.5-pt.2-div.2","sectionType":"division","heading":"General matters","content":"## General matters","sortOrder":119},{"sectionNumber":"sec.107","sectionType":"section","heading":"Existing authorised officers","content":"### sec.107 Existing authorised officers\n\nThis section applies to a person who—\nbefore the commencement, was appointed under a primary Act as an authorised officer; and\nstill held the appointment immediately before the commencement.\nThe relevant primary Acts are the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 and the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 .\nOn the commencement—\nthe person’s appointment as an authorised officer under the primary Act ends; and\nthe person is taken to hold office under this Act as an inspector for the primary Act on the conditions stated in the person’s instrument of appointment under the primary Act.\ns 107 amd 2014 No. 30 s 63 sch 1\n(sec.107-ssec.1) This section applies to a person who— before the commencement, was appointed under a primary Act as an authorised officer; and still held the appointment immediately before the commencement. The relevant primary Acts are the Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002 and the Second-hand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2003 .\n(sec.107-ssec.2) On the commencement— the person’s appointment as an authorised officer under the primary Act ends; and the person is taken to hold office under this Act as an inspector for the primary Act on the conditions stated in the person’s instrument of appointment under the primary Act.\n- (a) before the commencement, was appointed under a primary Act as an authorised officer; and\n- (b) still held the appointment immediately before the commencement.\n- (a) the person’s appointment as an authorised officer under the primary Act ends; and\n- (b) the person is taken to hold office under this Act as an inspector for the primary Act on the conditions stated in the person’s instrument of appointment under the primary Act.","sortOrder":120},{"sectionNumber":"sec.108","sectionType":"section","heading":"Existing inspectors","content":"### sec.108 Existing inspectors\n\nSubsection (2) applies to a person who—\nbefore the commencement, was appointed under a primary Act as an inspector; and\nstill held the appointment immediately before the commencement.\nThe relevant primary Acts are the Introduction Agents Act 2001 , the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 and the Security Providers Act 1993 , but not the Tourism Services Act 2003 which adopted inspectors appointed under the Fair Trading Act 1989 .\nOn the commencement, the person is taken to hold office under this Act as an inspector for the primary Act on the conditions stated in the person’s instrument of appointment under the primary Act.\nSubsection (4) applies to a person who—\nbefore the commencement, was appointed under the repealed Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000 as an inspector; and\nstill held the appointment immediately before the commencement.\nOn the commencement, the person is taken to hold office under this Act as an inspector for each 2014 primary Act on the conditions stated in the person’s instrument of appointment under the repealed Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000.\ns 108 amd 2014 No. 30 s 63 sch 1\n(sec.108-ssec.1) Subsection (2) applies to a person who— before the commencement, was appointed under a primary Act as an inspector; and still held the appointment immediately before the commencement. The relevant primary Acts are the Introduction Agents Act 2001 , the Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003 and the Security Providers Act 1993 , but not the Tourism Services Act 2003 which adopted inspectors appointed under the Fair Trading Act 1989 .\n(sec.108-ssec.2) On the commencement, the person is taken to hold office under this Act as an inspector for the primary Act on the conditions stated in the person’s instrument of appointment under the primary Act.\n(sec.108-ssec.3) Subsection (4) applies to a person who— before the commencement, was appointed under the repealed Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000 as an inspector; and still held the appointment immediately before the commencement.\n(sec.108-ssec.4) On the commencement, the person is taken to hold office under this Act as an inspector for each 2014 primary Act on the conditions stated in the person’s instrument of appointment under the repealed Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000.\n- (a) before the commencement, was appointed under a primary Act as an inspector; and\n- (b) still held the appointment immediately before the commencement.\n- (a) before the commencement, was appointed under the repealed Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000 as an inspector; and\n- (b) still held the appointment immediately before the commencement.","sortOrder":121},{"sectionNumber":"sec.109","sectionType":"section","heading":"Reviews and appeals","content":"### sec.109 Reviews and appeals\n\nPrevious provisions of any primary Act that provide for review or appeal of a decision made under the primary Act continue to apply after the commencement in relation to a decision made before the commencement as if the primary Act had not been amended by this Act.","sortOrder":122},{"sectionNumber":"sec.110","sectionType":"section","heading":"References in Acts and documents","content":"### sec.110 References in Acts and documents\n\nA reference in an Act or document to a previous provision of a primary Act may, if the context permits, be taken as a reference to the corresponding provision of the previous provision.","sortOrder":123}],"analysis":{"summary":{"complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The Act started as a framework statute to unify inspector powers across Queensland fair trading legislation. However, it has expanded beyond pure procedural/administrative machinery to include substantive powers such as vehicle stops, criminal history checks for inspector safety, and court-ordered disposal of property. The 2014 and 2020 amendments added additional primary Acts to its coverage (notably the Property Occupations Act 2014), broadening the range of regulated industries subject to these inspector powers beyond the original scope."},"complexity_factors":["Layered cross-referencing across multiple 'primary Acts' — you cannot fully understand this Act without reading six other pieces of legislation","Multiple entry powers with different conditions, limitations and procedural requirements depending on which entry method is used","Nuanced self-incrimination rules — the general right against self-incrimination is partially removed for document production, but a limited immunity applies under section 71 (not reproduced here), creating complex interplay","Warrant procedures include both standard and electronic/urgent pathways, with different paperwork trails and evidentiary consequences","Forfeiture and disposal rules involve multiple decision-makers (inspector, chief executive, court) with separate processes and appeal rights","Scope of powers differs depending on how entry was made (consent vs. warrant vs. open business), requiring careful tracking of which powers apply in each scenario","Criminal history access provisions create a parallel privacy/confidentiality regime within the Act","Multiple penalty tiers (20, 50, 100, 165, 200 penalty units; 1 year imprisonment) across different sections with varying defences"],"plain_english_summary":"## Fair Trading Inspectors Act 2014 — What It Does and Why It Matters\n\nThis Queensland law sets up the framework for **government inspectors** who enforce consumer protection and fair trading laws. Think of these inspectors as the people who make sure businesses comply with rules like property licensing, retirement village regulations, and tourism services laws.\n\n### Who Does This Affect?\n- **Businesses** regulated under Queensland fair trading laws (real estate agents, retirement village operators, tourism operators, residential park operators, etc.)\n- **Members of the public** who deal with those businesses (tenants, retirees, consumers)\n- **Government inspectors** themselves — setting out their powers and responsibilities\n\n### What Does the Law Actually Do?\n\n**1. Creates and Governs Inspectors**\nThe government's chief executive can appoint qualified public servants (or other prescribed persons) as inspectors. Each inspector gets an identity card and must show it before exercising any powers.\n\n**2. Gives Inspectors Powers to Enter Places**\nInspectors can enter business premises in four ways:\n- With the **owner/occupier's consent** (and the occupier must be told they don't have to agree)\n- Entering a **public place** when it's open\n- With a **warrant** (a court order) from a magistrate\n- Entering a **regulated business** that's open for business\n\n⚠️ *Important*: Inspectors **cannot** enter the part of a premises where someone lives without consent or a warrant.\n\n**3. What Inspectors Can Do Once Inside**\nOnce lawfully inside, inspectors can search, examine, photograph, take samples, copy documents, and require people to help them. People who refuse without a good reason can face fines or even imprisonment (up to 1 year for some offences).\n\n**4. Stopping Vehicles**\nIf an inspector suspects a vehicle contains evidence of an offence, they can pull it over — similar to police powers but limited to fair trading matters.\n\n**5. Seizing Evidence**\nInspectors can seize (take away) items they believe are evidence of offences. Seized items must be receipted, and owners can generally get them back after 1 year if no prosecution follows.\n\n**6. Safety Checks**\nIf an inspector is worried about their safety before entering a premises, the chief executive can request a **criminal history check** from police. This information is strictly confidential and must be destroyed once no longer needed.\n\n**7. Your Rights If an Inspector Visits You**\n- You must be shown the inspector's identity card\n- If asked for consent to enter, you can say no\n- If you're required to provide documents or information, you must generally comply — but there are limited protections against self-incrimination (meaning you can't be forced to hand over documents that would prove *you* broke the law, with some exceptions)\n- You have the right to inspect and copy seized items\n- You can appeal forfeiture (permanent loss) of seized items\n\n**Primary Acts covered include:**\n- Associations Incorporation Act 1981\n- Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Act 2003\n- Property Occupations Act 2014 (real estate licensing)\n- Residential Services (Accreditation) Act 2002\n- Retirement Villages Act 1999\n- Tourism Services Act 2003"},"issue_detection":{"absurdities":[],"contradictions":[]},"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"Unauthenticated. Configure AI_GATEWAY_API_KEY or use a provider module. Learn more: https://ai-sdk.dev/unauthenticated-ai-gateway","source":"analysis-cron"},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The Act consolidates and continues inspection‑related appointment, powers and procedures previously located in various primary Acts. Chapter 5 and related transitional provisions explicitly preserve prior documents, obligations and protections and take existing authorised officers/inspectors into this Act (see ss 95–106 and ss 98, 107–110). The statutory aim is continuity and centralisation rather than an expansion of scope beyond the prior primary Act arrangements."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple entry regimes (consent, public place, warrant, regulated business) with distinct procedural steps and exceptions (s 22 and divisions 2–3).","Detailed warrant application and electronic‑application procedures, including duplicate warrant handling and evidentiary onus rules (ss 27–31).","A wide range of coercive powers after entry (search, seizure, copying, electronic document production, marking, equipment use) with time and return obligations (s 38; ss 41–49).","Compulsory information/document production, certification and help requirements with differing limits on self‑incrimination and statutory immunities (ss 39–41, 57–61, 71).","Significant discretion held by the chief executive (appointments, limiting powers, forfeiture decisions, access to police records) combined with judicial oversight (ss 13–14, 50–53, 63–64, 27–28).","Multiple offence and penalty provisions with varying maximum penalties and conditions for conviction (e.g. ss 36, 40, 58–61, 68–69).","Transition and savings provisions that map many prior primary‑Act provisions into this Act, creating cross‑references and interpretive adjustments (ch 5, ss 95–106, 107–110).","Administrative review and appeal process with prescribed time limits, stays and rehearing powers (ss 73–81)."],"plain_english_summary":"# What this law does, who it affects, and how it works\n\nThis Act sets out who can act as a Fair Trading inspector, what inspectors may do, and the legal procedures they must follow when investigating and enforcing consumer- and business-related laws (this Act and various \"primary Acts\"). It centralises and continues inspector appointment, entry, search, seizure, information‑gathering and review procedures that previously appeared in separate primary Acts (see s 95 and ch 5). \n\nKey mechanics (what changes or is created, in plain terms):\n\n- Inspectors’ core responsibilities are to investigate, monitor and enforce compliance, to watch for occasions to use their powers, and to facilitate use of those powers (s 12).  \n- The chief executive appoints inspectors (public servants or other prescribed persons) and must be satisfied of their qualifications (s 13). Appointment conditions and limits on powers may be set in the appointment instrument, a signed notice or regulation (s 14).  \n- Inspectors must carry identity cards and display or produce them when exercising powers in someone’s presence (ss 17–18). Cards must include photo, signature, the primary Act and an expiry date (s 17).  \n- Entry rules: inspectors may enter places with occupier consent, where the place is a public place open to the public, under warrant, or a regulated place of business when open (s 22). Consent entries are subject to any consent conditions and may be withdrawn (s 22).  \n- Procedures for consent: inspectors must explain purpose and rights before asking for consent; occupiers may sign an acknowledgement which shifts the burden of proof about consent in later disputes (ss 23–26).  \n- Warrants: inspectors apply to a magistrate (written and sworn application); magistrates may issue warrants on grounds of reasonable suspicion of evidence of an offence or where access is reasonably necessary to perform inspectors’ functions (ss 27–28). Electronic applications and duplicate‑warrant procedures are provided (ss 29–30).  \n- After lawful entry, inspectors have an extensive set of powers: search, inspect/film, take items or samples for examination, mark items, copy documents (including producing electronic documents), bring personnel and equipment, and stay as needed (s 38).  \n- Inspectors can require reasonable help (produce documents, give information) and must give an offence warning when doing so (ss 39, 57). There are criminal penalties for failing to comply with help, document production, certification or information notices (ss 40, 58–61). Some non‑compliance defences are available (for example, risk of self‑incrimination for certain requirements—see ss 40, 61) but for document production and certification the obligation to comply is generally overriding, subject to the limited immunity in s 71.  \n- Seizure and post‑seizure handling: inspectors may seize evidence in many circumstances (ss 41–42), secure or move seized goods (s 44), give receipts and information to owners (s 47), allow owners reasonable inspection/copying while goods remain held (s 48), return goods normally within a year or after proceedings (s 49), and the chief executive can forfeit items to the State in stated circumstances (ss 50–53). Courts can also make disposal orders on conviction (s 54).  \n- Confidentiality and criminal history reports: the chief executive may obtain police criminal history reports to assess risk to inspectors (s 63); these reports are confidential and must be destroyed once the safety assessment is complete (s 64).  \n- Damage and compensation: inspectors must minimise damage and inconvenience (s 65). If damage occurs, notice obligations apply (s 66). Affected persons may claim compensation from the State in court where it is just (s 67).  \n- Sanctions and criminal offences: the Act creates offences for giving false or misleading information, obstructing inspectors, impersonating an inspector, and for specific failures to comply with requirements; penalties are set out (e.g. ss 68–70, 36, 56, 58, 59).  \n- Review and appeals: a two‑stage process applies — internal review by the chief executive, then appeal to a Magistrates Court; timeframes and stay procedures are specified (ss 72–81).  \n\nWho pays and who decides\n\n- Who decides: the chief executive appoints and manages inspectors and makes administrative decisions (ss 13–14, 50); magistrates decide on warrants (ss 27–28); courts hear appeals and may order compensation or disposal of things (chs 3 and s 54).  \n- Who pays: individuals and businesses bear compliance costs and potential penalties for non‑compliance; the State bears financial responsibility for compensation orders under s 67 and becomes owner of forfeited goods (ss 50, 53, 67).  \n\nCompliance burdens, incentives and trade‑offs (mechanisms, not judgments)\n\n- Compliance burdens: regulated businesses must make documents available, produce certified copies if required, provide information, and allow inspections and possible temporary loss of items (ss 38, 57–59, 60–61, 42–49). Penalties for non‑compliance are sizable in some cases (e.g. up to 200 penalty units or imprisonment—see ss 40, 58–61).  \n- Incentives and behaviour change: the combination of compulsory production powers, seizure, and penalties creates incentives to maintain records and to cooperate to avoid seizure, penalties and interruption (ss 38, 42, 57–61). Courts retain discretion to order disposal and compensation, which affects post‑seizure outcomes (ss 54, 67).  \n- Bureaucratic discretion and concentration of decision power: the chief executive has appointment and forfeiture powers, and inspectors exercise a range of coercive powers once appointed; magistrates and courts exercise oversight (ss 13–14, 28, 50, 54, 76–81). Those points are the main loci of administrative discretion.  \n\nImplementation and procedural risks\n\n- Warrant procedures allow electronic applications in urgent or special circumstances, but require the magistrate to be satisfied as to necessity and appropriateness and set out duplicate warrant handling (ss 29–30) — this creates procedural safeguards and an operational process that must be followed.  \n- The Act preserves and maps many previously existing provisions from primary Acts into a single framework (ch 5 and ss 95–106), with transitional rules that continue earlier appointments and notices (ss 98, 107–110). This reduces legal gap risk but requires attention to transitional particulars.  \n\nWhere the Act says it is intended to help inspectors with safety assessments and to continue prior inspection powers, those claims are set out explicitly (s 62 and s 95). Against those purposes the Act creates costs (inspections, document production, possible seizure) for people and businesses, and allocates discretion to administrative and judicial actors for warrants, appointments, forfeiture and compensation (see cited sections above)."},"kimi_summary":{"_metrics":{"completionTokens":533},"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The legislation appears consistent with its original purpose as a centralising statute for fair trading inspector powers. The transitional provisions in Chapter 5 explicitly confirm this was designed to replace and consolidate inspector provisions from multiple existing Acts rather than expand beyond that purpose."},"complexity_factors":["Extensive cross-referencing to multiple 'primary Acts' (6+ other pieces of legislation)","Nested conditional logic for entry powers (consent vs warrant vs public place vs regulated business)","Detailed warrant application procedures including electronic application provisions","Multiple overlapping immunities and exceptions (self-incrimination, evidential use, reasonable excuse)","Transitional provisions preserving pre-existing appointments and documents under repealed laws","Defined terms scattered throughout (e.g. 'primary Act', 'authority', 'condition of office') with context-dependent meanings"],"plain_english_summary":"This Queensland legislation establishes a comprehensive framework for **Fair Trading Inspectors** — government officials who investigate and enforce consumer protection laws across multiple industries.\n\n**What it does:**\n- **Creates a unified inspectorate**: Instead of separate inspectors for each industry law, this Act allows one inspector to work across multiple \"primary Acts\" (laws about property agents, motor dealers, retirement villages, tourism services, etc.)\n- **Sets out powers of entry**: Inspectors can enter places with consent, under warrant, or (for regulated businesses) when open to the public — but **not** private homes without consent or warrant\n- **Grants investigation powers**: Search premises, examine documents, take samples, seize evidence, require people to produce documents or give information, and stop vehicles\n- **Protects individuals**: People can refuse to give information that might incriminate themselves, and there's limited immunity for documents produced under compulsion\n- **Provides oversight**: Decisions can be reviewed internally and appealed to Magistrates Court; inspectors must minimise damage and can be required to pay compensation\n\n**Who it affects:**\n- **Businesses** regulated under Queensland fair trading laws (real estate agents, motor dealers, retirement village operators, etc.)\n- **Consumers** who interact with these businesses\n- **Inspectors** themselves — public servants appointed by the chief executive with identity cards and specific conditions\n\n**Why it matters:**\nThis is a **\"hub\" law** that centralises enforcement powers. Rather than having slightly different inspector rules in each industry Act, this creates consistent standards for how officials can investigate potential breaches of consumer protection laws — with built-in safeguards against abuse of power."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/fair-trading-inspectors-act-2014","history":"/api/acts/fair-trading-inspectors-act-2014/history","analysis":"/api/acts/fair-trading-inspectors-act-2014/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/fair-trading-inspectors-act-2014/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/fair-trading-inspectors-act-2014/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/fair-trading-inspectors-act-2014/documents"}}