{"id":"F2025L01050","name":"Radiocommunications Advisory Guidelines (Managing Interference to Spectrum Licensed Receivers – 3.4 GHz Band) 2025","slug":"f2025l01050","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":345338,"registerId":"commonwealth-F2025L01050-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-08","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Name","content":"#### 1 Name\n\n  These are the Radiocommunications Advisory Guidelines (Managing Interference to Spectrum Licensed Receivers – 3.4 GHz Band) 2025.","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"2","sectionType":"section","heading":"Commencement","content":"#### 2 Commencement\n\n  This instrument commences on 23 September 2025.\n\n> Note: The Federal Register of Legislation is available, free of charge, at www.legislation.gov.au.","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"3","sectionType":"section","heading":"Authority","content":"#### 3 Authority\n\n  This instrument is made under section 262 of the Act.","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"4","sectionType":"section","heading":"Repeal of the Radiocommunications Advisory Guidelines (Managing Interference to Spectrum Licensed Receivers — 3.4 GHz Band) 2015","content":"#### 4 Repeal of the Radiocommunications Advisory Guidelines (Managing Interference to Spectrum Licensed Receivers – 3.4 GHz Band) 2015\n\n  The Radiocommunications Advisory Guidelines (Managing Interference to Spectrum Licensed Receivers – 3.4 GHz Band) 2015 (F2015L00729) are repealed.","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"5","sectionType":"section","heading":"Definitions","content":"#### 5 Definitions\n\n  (1) In this instrument:\n\n> 3.4 GHz band means the frequency band 3400 MHz to 3800 MHz.\n\n> 3.4 GHz receiver means a radiocommunications receiver operated under a 3.4 GHz spectrum licence.\n\n> 3.4 GHz spectrum licence means a spectrum licence that authorises the operation of radiocommunications devices in the 3.4 GHz band.\n\n> adjacent channel, in relation to another channel (the occupied channel), means a channel with a centre frequency offset on either side of the assigned channel frequency of the occupied channel by a specific frequency relation.\n\n> adjacent channel selectivity: see item 2 of Schedule 1.\n\n> compatibility requirement: see Part 5 and Schedule 2.\n\n> device boundary criterion:\n\n    (a) in relation to a radiocommunications transmitter operated under a 3.4 GHz spectrum licence – has the meaning given by the section 145 determination;\n    (b) in relation to a radiocommunications transmitter operated under a transmitter licence – means the test set out in RALI MS 47 for the permitted location of the device boundary for a radiocommunications transmitter.\n\n> Note: Clause 4 of Schedule 4 to the Radiocommunications Licence Conditions (Area-Wide Licence) Determination 2020 imposes a condition on area-wide licences in the 3.4 GHz band in relation to the device boundary for radiocommunications transmitters operated under such a licence.\n\n> fixed licence (point to multipoint system) has the meaning given by:\n\n    (a) the Radiocommunications Licence Conditions (Fixed Licence) Determination 2025; or\n    (b) if another instrument replaces that determination and defines the term – the other instrument.\n\n> intermodulation response rejection: see item 3 of Schedule 1.\n\n> notional receiver performance level: see subsection 12(2) and item 1 of Schedule 1.\n\n> RALI MS 47 means the Radiocommunications Assignment and Licensing Instruction MS 47 Frequency coordination and licensing procedures for Area-Wide Licences (AWL) in the 3400-4000 MHz band, published by the ACMA.\n\n> Note: RALI MS 47 is available, free of charge, from the ACMA’s website at www.acma.gov.au.\n\n> RALI MS 50 means the Radiocommunications Assignment and Licensing Instruction MS 50 Frequency coordination and licensing procedures for point-to-multipoint system licences in the 3400-3475 MHz and 3950-4000 MHz bands, published by the ACMA.\n\n> Note: RALI MS 50 is available, free of charge, from the ACMA’s website at www.acma.gov.au.\n\n> receiver blocking, in relation to a radiocommunications receiver, means the measure of the ability of the receiver to receive a wanted signal in the presence of a high level unwanted interferer on frequencies other than those of an adjacent channel, see item 4 of Schedule 1.\n\n> section 145 determination means the Radiocommunications (Unacceptable Levels of Interference – 3.4 GHz Band) Determination 2025.\n\n> Note 1: The section 145 determination is available, free of charge, from the Federal Register of Legislation at www.legislation.gov.au.\n\n> Note 2: A number of other expressions used in this instrument are defined in the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) ACMA;\n    (b) apparatus licence;\n    (c) class licence;\n    (d) core condition;\n    (e) frequency band;\n    (f) interference;\n    (g) radiocommunications device;\n    (h) radiocommunications receiver;\n    (i) radiocommunications transmitter;\n    (j) Register;\n    (k) spectrum licence;\n    (l) transmitter licence.\n\n> Note 3: A number of other expressions used in this instrument may be defined in the Radiocommunications (Interpretation – Technical Framework) Determination 2024 or in another instrument made under subsection 64(1) of the Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005 to replace it, including:\n\n    (a) Act;\n    (b) centre frequency;\n    (c) emission buffer zone;\n    (d) fixed receiver;\n    (e) fixed transmitter;\n    (f) geographic area;\n    (g) in-band;\n    (h) mobile device;\n    (i) out-of-band;\n    (j) unwanted signal;\n    (k) wanted signal.\n  (2) In this instrument, unless the contrary intention appears, each of the terms listed in subsection (3) has the meaning given by:\n    (a) the Radiocommunications (Interpretation) Determination 2025; or\n    (b) if another instrument replaces that determination and defines the term – the other instrument.\n  (3) For the purposes of subsection (2), the terms are:\n    (a) area-wide licence;\n    (b) radiodetermination licence.\n  (4) In this instrument, unless otherwise specified, a reference to a part of the spectrum or a frequency band includes all frequencies that are greater than but not including the lower frequency, up to and including the higher frequency.\n\n> Note: This subsection means the lower number in a part of the spectrum or a frequency band is not included in the part of the spectrum or the frequency band.","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"6","sectionType":"section","heading":"References to other instruments","content":"#### 6 References to other instruments\n\n  In this instrument, unless the contrary intention appears:\n    (a) a reference to any other legislative instrument is a reference to that other legislative instrument as in force from time to time; and\n    (b) a reference to any other kind of instrument or writing is a reference to that other instrument or writing as in force or existing from time to time.\n\n> Note 1: For references to Commonwealth Acts, see section 10 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901; and see also subsection 13(1) of the Legislation Act 2003 for the application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to legislative instruments.\n\n> Note 2: All Commonwealth Acts and legislative instruments are registered on the Federal Register of Legislation.\n\n> Note 3: See section 314A of the Act.","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"7","sectionType":"section","heading":"Background","content":"#### 7 Background\n\n  (1) A spectrum licence authorises the operation of radiocommunications devices within a part of the spectrum and in a geographic area. Interference occurring between adjacent spectrum licences consists of in-band interference across the geographic boundaries, and out-of-band interference across the frequency boundaries.\n  (2) This interference is managed by creating emission buffer zones along the geographic and frequency boundaries of a spectrum licence, using a number of powers under the Act. Emission buffer zones may be created by, or as a result of, the following:\n    (a) specifying out-of-area and out-of-band emission limits in the core conditions of the licence, which must be included in all spectrum licences (see section 66 of the Act);\n    (b) a determination under section 145 of the Act, relating to unacceptable levels of interference and the registration of radiocommunications devices, and related licence conditions (see section 69 of the Act);\n    (c) advisory guidelines under section 262 of the Act, about managing interference in specific circumstances.\n  (3) This instrument:\n    (a) provides protection to 3.4 GHz receivers from interference caused by:\n    (i) radiocommunications transmitters operated under a class licence; or\n    (ii) fixed transmitters operated under a transmitter licence; or\n    (iii) fixed transmitters operated under a 3.4 GHz spectrum licence; and\n    (b) assists in the management of in-band and out-of-band interference by providing compatibility requirements for registered fixed receivers operated under 3.4 GHz spectrum licences; and\n    (c) sets out minimum receiver performance requirements that the ACMA will assume are met by a radiocommunications receiver, when considering whether to provide protection to the receiver in accordance with this instrument, so that the onus of managing interference is not solely placed upon the operators of radiocommunications transmitters.\n  (4) This instrument is intended to provide guidance on the management and settlement of interference to 3.4 GHz receivers, caused by radiocommunications transmitters operated under a class licence or an apparatus licence or another spectrum licence issued under the Act.\n  (5) This instrument should be used by spectrum licensees, apparatus licensees, and authorised third parties in the planning of services and in the resolution of interference.\n  (6) This instrument does not prevent a person negotiating and implementing other protection requirements with other persons.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"8","sectionType":"section","heading":"In-band interference","content":"#### 8 In-band interference\n\n  (1) In-band interference to a 3.4 GHz receiver, caused by a radiocommunications transmitter operated under an adjacent spectrum licence, is managed by:\n    (a) the core conditions imposed on spectrum licences under section 66 of the Act; and\n    (b) the device boundary criterion and any deployment constraints in the section 145 determination; and\n    (c) the recommended preliminary coordination procedures in Part 8 of the Radiocommunication Advisory Guidelines (Managing Interference from Spectrum Licensed Transmitters – 3.4 GHz Band) 2025; and\n    (c) any condition set out in the adjacent spectrum licence relating to synchronisation (a synchronisation requirement), unless other arrangements are agreed to by the affected licensees.\n  (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), in-band interference to a 3.4 GHz receiver, caused by a radiocommunications transmitter operated under a transmitter licence first issued:\n    (a) if the 3.4 GHz receiver operates in the 3400 MHz to 3575 MHz frequency band – on or after 16 July 2022;\n    (b) if the 3.4 GHz receiver operates in the 3575 MHz to 3700 MHz frequency band – on or after 9 March 2018;\n    (c) if the 3.4 GHz receiver operates in the 3700 MHz to 3800 MHz frequency band – on or after 16 July 2022;\n  is managed by the device boundary criterion as if the transmitter were operated under an area-wide licence.\n\n> Note: The Radiocommunications (Spectrum Re-allocation – 3.6 GHz Band for Adelaide and Eastern Metropolitan Australia) Declaration 2018, the Radiocommunications (Spectrum RE-allocation – 3.6 GHz Band for Perth) Declaration 2018 and the Radiocommunications (Spectrum Re-allocation – 3.6 GHz Band for Regional Australia) Declaration 2018 commenced on 9 March 2018. The Radiocommunications (Spectrum Re-allocation – 3.4 GHz and 3.7 GHz Bands) Declaration 2022 commenced on 16 July 2022. These legislative instruments are available, free of charge, from the Federal Register of Legislation at www.legislation.gov.au.\n\n  (3) Radiocommunications transmitters operating under a radiodetermination licence are not required to follow the device boundary criterion and any deployment constraints in RALI MS 47 if the person operating the transmitters implements measures to minimise the impact on radiocommunications devices operated under 3.4 GHz spectrum licences. In-band interference caused by such radiocommunications transmitters is expected to be transient in nature. Where it is not, the person operating the transmitters is to implement further mitigation measures to reduce the impact on radiocommunications devices operated under 3.4 GHz spectrum licences. To assist with managing in-band interference, when planning and operating fixed or mobile wireless networks, 3.4 GHz spectrum licensees should have regard to subsection 9(5).\n  (4) Radiocommunications transmitters operating under a fixed licence (point to multipoint system) are generally not required to meet the device boundary criterion. Coexistence arrangements for these transmitters with 3.4 GHz receivers are included in the Radiocommunications Licence Conditions (Fixed Licence) Determination 2025 (or any instrument that replaces that determination) and in RALI MS50.\n  (5) The ACMA does not intend to protect 3.4 GHz receivers from in-band interference caused by a radiocommunications transmitter operated under a transmitter licence (other than a radiodetermination licence) first issued:\n    (a) if the 3.4 GHz receiver operates in the 3400 MHz to 3575 MHz frequency band – before 16 July 2022;\n    (b) if the 3.4 GHz receiver operates in the 3575 MHz to 3700 MHz frequency band – before 9 March 2018;\n    (c) if the 3.4 GHz receiver operates in the 3700 MHz to 3800 MHz frequency band – before 16 July 2022.\n\n> Note: The Radiocommunications (Spectrum Re-allocation – 3.6 GHz Band for Adelaide and Eastern Metropolitan Australia) Declaration 2018, the Radiocommunications (Spectrum RE-allocation – 3.6 GHz Band for Perth) Declaration 2018 and the Radiocommunications (Spectrum Re-allocation – 3.6 GHz Band for Regional Australia) Declaration 2018 commenced on 9 March 2018. The Radiocommunications (Spectrum Re-allocation – 3.4 GHz and 3.7 GHz Bands) Declaration 2022 commenced on 16 July 2022. These legislative instruments are available, free of charge, from the Federal Register of Legislation at www.legislation.gov.au.\n\n  (6) The interference management frameworks, if any are required, for radiocommunications devices operated under a class licence are contained in the relevant class licence.","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"9","sectionType":"section","heading":"Out-of-band interference","content":"#### 9 Out-of-band interference\n\n  (1) Out-of-band interference is difficult to predict, because the levels and frequencies of unwanted emissions depend on both the nearness and the operating frequencies of radiocommunications transmitters and radiocommunications receivers that are spectrally or geographically close. In addition, out-of-band interference:\n    (a) can extend for many MHz either side of the frequency boundary of a spectrum licence; and\n    (b) is dependent on the quality of the radiocommunications receiver as well as the levels of the radiocommunications transmitter’s emissions; and\n    (c) is difficult to model accurately.\n  (2) Emission limits are also used to manage out-of-band interference, but these do not provide protection along the frequency boundaries of a spectrum licence throughout the entire geographic area. Because of the nature of out-of-band interference, emission limits cannot be used to provide protection from out-of-band interference for radiocommunications devices that are located near each other.\n\n> Note: Example: Radiocommunications devices that are located near each other include devices located at multi-operator sites.\n\n  (3) Emission limits are not the sole mechanism used to manage out-of-band interference for devices in close proximity, because the interference modelling inaccuracy would require large probability margins to be added to those limits. Large probability margins would place severe constraints on the use of the spectrum because the upper and lower frequency limits of a spectrum licence extend throughout the geographic area. Emission limits to manage out-of-band interference throughout the geographic area cannot be used, because they would lead to a severe loss of utility of the spectrum on both sides of the frequency limits.\n  (4) To avoid large probability margins, out-of-band interference is managed through interference management procedures based on a compatibility requirement for radiocommunications receivers. A minimum level of receiver performance is specified in Part 4 in conjunction with the compatibility requirement because the performance level of receivers:\n    (a) affects the level of interference; and\n    (b) can vary for receivers operating under spectrum licences.\n\n> Note: The minimum level of receiver performance is specified in Part 4. The compatibility requirement is set out in Part 5.\n\n  (5) High power radiolocation services are operated in the 3100 MHz to 3500 MHz frequency band by the Department of Defence, on an itinerant basis. These radiolocation services have the potential to disrupt the throughput of 3.4 GHz receivers, particularly on the uplink channel (base station receiver). The Department of Defence employs techniques to minimise the impact on in-band and adjacent band services. However, there may be occasions when interference cannot be fully mitigated by these techniques. In such a case, the interference may be due to receiver blocking, strong out-of-band emissions of the radar, or other susceptibilities within a fixed or mobile wireless network configuration. When planning service deployments, 3.4 GHz spectrum licensees should consider different engineering techniques to reduce the likelihood of an impact on their radiocommunications devices. Such techniques may include additional radiofrequency filtering, network redundancy, or resilience of network configuration where vulnerabilities to radar signal interference are identified. The ACMA intends to work with the Department of Defence to provide what additional information it can to assist spectrum licensees on this matter. Such information will generally only be given directly to existing or likely prospective spectrum licensees.","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"10","sectionType":"section","heading":"Recording radiocommunications receiver details in the Register","content":"#### 10 Recording radiocommunications receiver details in the Register\n\n  (1) In this instrument, for a 3.4 GHz receiver to be afforded protection from interference caused by a transmitter licensed radiocommunications transmitter, the details of the receiver must have been included in the Register before the relevant transmitter licence was first issued under section 100 of the Act.\n  (2) In this instrument, for a 3.4 GHz receiver to be afforded protection from interference caused by a spectrum licensed radiocommunications transmitter, the details of the receiver must have been included in the Register before the details of the relevant transmitter were included in the Register.\n\n> Note: See also Part 5.","sortOrder":9},{"sectionNumber":"11","sectionType":"section","heading":"Mobile devices","content":"#### 11 Mobile devices\n\n  The compatibility requirement specified in Part 5 does not apply to radiocommunications receivers operated under a 3.4 GHz spectrum licence that are mobile devices, because the itinerant nature of these devices prevents the use of this requirement as an interference management procedure.","sortOrder":10},{"sectionNumber":"12","sectionType":"section","heading":"Notional receiver performance level","content":"#### 12 Notional receiver performance level\n\n  (1) The level of interference caused by unwanted emissions depends on the interference susceptibility of a radiocommunications receiver and the level of the unwanted signal. Emission levels from radiocommunications transmitters should not have to be reduced below a point where the performance of the radiocommunications receiver is the main cause of the problem.\n  (2) A notional receiver performance level is set out in Schedule 1 and is to be used when setting a compatibility requirement for a radiocommunications receiver. A receiver should meet the notional receiver performance level to gain protection from interference from a radiocommunications transmitter specified in this instrument.","sortOrder":11},{"sectionNumber":"13","sectionType":"section","heading":"Compatibility","content":"#### 13 Compatibility\n\n  (1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), in relation to a fixed receiver specified in subsection (2), the licensee of a fixed transmitter operated under a transmitter licence or a spectrum licence must ensure that the transmitter meets the compatibility requirement in Schedule 2.\n  (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a fixed receiver is specified if the receiver:\n    (a) is operated under a spectrum licence; and\n    (b) has at least the notional receiver performance level; and\n    (c) was included in the Register before:\n    (i) if the fixed transmitter mentioned in subsection (1) is operated under a spectrum licence – the fixed transmitter was included in the Register; or\n    (ii) if the fixed transmitter mentioned in subsection (1) is operated under a transmitter licence – the transmitter licence was issued.\n  (3) Unless alternative arrangements are agreed, where interference is caused between radiocommunications devices operated under 3.4 GHz spectrum licences, 3.4 GHz spectrum licensees may be required to synchronise the operation of their radiocommunications transmitters, in accordance with any synchronisation requirement in a condition in the licence.\n  (4) Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to a fixed transmitter operated under a radiodetermination licence.\n\n> Note: For a radiocommunications transmitter operated under a radiodetermination licence, see subsection 8(3).\n\n  (5) A radiocommunications transmitter operated under a class licence must comply with the conditions of the class licence.","sortOrder":12},{"sectionNumber":"Compatibility requirement","sectionType":"section","heading":"Compatibility requirement","content":"#### Compatibility requirement\n\n  (1) The compatibility requirement for a fixed receiver, operated under a spectrum licence, to be provided by a radiocommunications transmitter operated under a transmitter licence or a spectrum licence, is a maximum unwanted signal level of -108 dBm per 5 MHz, not exceeded for more than 5% of any 1 hour period.\n  (2) Logarithmic scaling should be used to find the appropriate maximum unwanted signal level in alternative bandwidths.","sortOrder":18}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"Unauthenticated. Configure AI_GATEWAY_API_KEY or use a provider module. Learn more: https://ai-sdk.dev/unauthenticated-ai-gateway","source":"analysis-cron"},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The legislation appears consistent with its original purpose as stated in section 7(3)-(4): providing protection to 3.4 GHz receivers and managing interference between spectrum licensed and apparatus licensed devices. The 2025 version updates technical references and dates but maintains the same core scope as the 2015 instrument it replaces."},"complexity_factors":["18 defined terms in section 5, with multiple external cross-references to other instruments (RALI MS 47, RALI MS 50, section 145 determination, Radiocommunications Licence Conditions determinations)","Nested conditional logic in section 8 with date-based thresholds (three different frequency sub-bands with different cut-off dates: 9 March 2018 and 16 July 2022)","Multiple exception clauses: radiodetermination licences (subsection 8(3)), fixed point-to-multipoint systems (subsection 8(4)), pre-2018/pre-2022 transmitter licences (subsection 8(5)), mobile devices (section 11), and class licences (section 13(5))","Technical performance tables in Schedule 1 with bandwidth-dependent thresholds requiring interpolation","Complex registration timing requirements: receivers must be registered before transmitters are licensed OR before transmitter details are registered in the Register (section 10), with different triggers for transmitter licences vs spectrum licences","External incorporation of technical standards (3GPP TS 38.104 V18.9.0) by reference","Dual management frameworks for in-band (geographic) vs out-of-band (frequency) interference with different procedural rules for each"],"plain_english_summary":"This instrument sets interference rules for the 3.4 GHz band (3400–3800 MHz), protecting registered receivers by requiring minimum receiver performance and registration before nearby transmitters are licensed. It affects spectrum and apparatus licensees and Defence, while mobile handsets are excluded. By assigning responsibilities to both transmitters and receivers, it helps ensure efficient, reliable 5G and wireless broadband use without operators constantly disrupting one another."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The instrument states its purpose is to provide guidance to protect 3.4 GHz receivers, set minimum receiver performance, and specify compatibility procedures and registration timing. While it repeals the 2015 guidelines and references other determinations, the text itself does not assert an expansion or contraction of the classes of protected receivers beyond its stated definitions and enumerated exceptions (mobile devices, radiodetermination, fixed point‑to‑multipoint), so its operational scope is consistent with the instrument's stated intent."},"complexity_factors":["Technical performance specifications in dB (adjacent‑channel selectivity, intermodulation rejection, blocking) requiring RF measurement and interpretation against notional sensitivity levels","Compatibility requirement expressed as an aggregate unwanted signal limit (−108 dBm/5 MHz, 5%/hour) with logarithmic scaling to other bandwidths","Multiple time‑ and frequency‑dependent rules (different treatment for sub‑bands 3400–3575, 3575–3700, 3700–3800 MHz tied to licence issue dates)","Registration timing condition: receivers must be recorded in the Register before a transmitter licence is issued or transmitter details are registered to receive protection","Numerous cross‑references to other instruments (section 145 determination, RALI MS47, RALI MS50, Radiocommunications Licence Conditions Determinations) that modify obligations and introduce external technical rules","Exceptions and carve‑outs (mobile devices, radiodetermination licences, fixed point‑to‑multipoint licences) that create conditional application and multiple coordination pathways","Operational coordination requirements (device boundary criterion, deployment constraints, potential synchronisation obligations) that impose planning and negotiation burdens on licensees","Measurement framing at the antenna connector (includes external filters and feeder losses) and default assumptions (17 dBi gain) that can shift compliance costs to parties unable to supply precise data","Uncertainty from hard‑to‑model out‑of‑band interference and transient sources (e.g. Defence radars) requiring site‑specific engineering mitigations and discretionary information sharing by ACMA","Regulatory discretion and non‑binding language in places (ACMA ‘intends’ to act, advisory guidelines) combined with binding licence core conditions elsewhere"],"plain_english_summary":"**What this does:** Updates guidance for managing interference in the 3400–3800 MHz (3.4 GHz) band. It replaces the 2015 guidelines, sets minimum receiver‑performance levels and a compatibility limit (maximum unwanted signal −108 dBm per 5 MHz, not exceeded more than 5% of any hour), and requires fixed receivers to be recorded in the Register before they gain protection. \n\n**Who it affects and why it matters:** Spectrum licensees, transmitter and apparatus licensees, class‑licence operators and equipment vendors: they must coordinate, meet technical limits, register receivers, or bear mitigation costs; ACMA and licence conditions govern enforcement."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/f2025l01050","history":"/api/acts/f2025l01050/history","analysis":"/api/acts/f2025l01050/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/f2025l01050/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/f2025l01050/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/f2025l01050/documents"}}