{"id":"F2023L01380","name":"Banking, Insurance, Life Insurance, Health Insurance and Superannuation (prudential standard) determination No. 1 of 2023","slug":"f2023l01380","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":319330,"registerId":"commonwealth-F2023L01380-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-08","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"Authority","sectionType":"part","heading":"Authority","content":"# Authority\n\n1.  This Prudential Standard is made under:\n\n(a) section 11AF of the Banking Act 1959 (Banking Act);\n\n(b) section 32 of the Insurance Act 1973 (Insurance Act);\n\n(c) section 230A of the Life Insurance Act 1995 (Life Insurance Act);\n\n(d) section 92 of the Private Health Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2015 (PHIPS Act); and\n\n(e) section 34C of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act).","sortOrder":0},{"sectionNumber":"Application, definitions and commencemen","sectionType":"part","heading":"Application, definitions and commencement","content":"# Application, definitions and commencement\n\n2. Subject to paragraphs 3 and 4, this Prudential Standard applies to all APRA-regulated entities, defined as:\n\n(a) authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and non-operating holding companies authorised under the Banking Act (authorised banking NOHCs), but excluding purchased payment facility providers;\n\n(b) general insurers, including Category C insurers, non-operating holding companies authorised under the Insurance Act (authorised insurance NOHCs), and parent entities of Level 2 insurance groups;\n\n(c) life companies, including friendly societies and eligible foreign life insurance companies (EFLICs), and registered NOHCs;\n\n(d) private health insurers; and\n\n(e) RSE licensees under the SIS Act in respect of their business operations.[\\[1\\]](#_ftn1)\n\n3. The obligations imposed by this Prudential Standard on, or in relation to, a Category C insurer or an EFLIC apply only in relation to the Australian branch operations of that entity. This Prudential Standard does not apply to a foreign ADI unless APRA determines that all or part of this Prudential Standard applies to the Australian branch operations of the foreign ADI.[\\[2\\]](#_ftn2)\n\n4. For the purposes of this Prudential Standard, an APRA-regulated entity is either a significant financial institution (SFI) or a non-significant financial institution (non-SFI). Unless APRA determines otherwise in a particular case,[\\[3\\]](#_ftn3) the requirements of this Prudential Standard apply to SFIs and non-SFIs as indicated.\n\n5. For the purposes of this Prudential Standard, an SFI means, in relation to RSE licensees, an RSE licensee that either:\n\n(a) has total assets in excess of AUD $30 billion in the case of a single RSE operated by an RSE licensee, or if the RSE licensee operates more than one RSE, where the combined total assets of all RSEs exceed this amount; or\n\n(b) is determined as such by APRA, having regard to matters such as complexity in its operations or its membership of a group.\n\nA non-SFI means, in relation to RSE licensees, an RSE licensee that is not an SFI.[\\[4\\]](#_ftn4)\n\n6. Where an APRA-regulated entity is the Head of a group,[\\[5\\]](#_ftn5) it must comply with an applicable requirement of this Prudential Standard:\n\n(a) in its capacity as an APRA-regulated entity;\n\n(b) by ensuring that the requirement is applied appropriately throughout the group,[\\[6\\]](#_ftn6) including in relation to entities that are not APRA-regulated; and\n\n(c) on a group basis.\n\n7. In applying the requirements of this Prudential Standard on a group basis, references to an ‘APRA-regulated entity’ must be read as ‘Head of a group’ and references to ‘entity’ must be read as ‘group’.\n\n8. This Prudential Standard applies to:\n\n(a) an APRA-regulated entity, other than an RSE licensee, on 1 January 2024; and\n\n(b) an RSE licensee on 1 January 2025.","sortOrder":1},{"sectionNumber":"Interpretation","sectionType":"part","heading":"Interpretation","content":"# Interpretation\n\n9. Terms that are defined in Prudential Standard 3PS 001 Definitions (3PS 001), Prudential Standard APS 001 Definitions (APS 001), Prudential Standard GPS 001 Definitions (GPS 001), Prudential Standard LPS 001 Definitions (LPS 001) or Prudential Standard HPS 001 Definitions (HPS 001) appear in bold the first time they are used in this Prudential Standard.\n\n10. In this Prudential Standard, unless the contrary intention appears, a reference to an Act, Regulations or Prudential Standard is a reference to the Act, Regulations or Prudential Standard as in force from time to time.\n\n11. Where this Prudential Standard provides for APRA to exercise a power or discretion, the power or discretion is to be exercised in writing.","sortOrder":2},{"sectionNumber":"Adjustments and exclusions","sectionType":"part","heading":"Adjustments and exclusions","content":"# Adjustments and exclusions\n\n12. APRA may adjust or exclude a specific requirement in this Prudential Standard in relation to an APRA-regulated entity.","sortOrder":3},{"sectionNumber":"Recovery and exit planning","sectionType":"part","heading":"Recovery and exit planning","content":"# Recovery and exit planning\n\n13. An APRA-regulated entity must develop and maintain a recovery and exit plan that sets out how it would respond to a stress that threatens its viability. The recovery and exit plan must demonstrate how the APRA-regulated entity could:\n\n(a) take actions to recover its financial resilience; and\n\n(b) enable its orderly and solvent exit from regulated activity, if actions to recover financial resilience are not effective.\n\n14. The recovery and exit plan must be appropriate to the size, business mix and complexity of the APRA-regulated entity and, for an RSE licensee, the RSE licensee’s business operations.\n\n15. The recovery and exit plan must be integrated into the APRA-regulated entity’s:\n\n(a) risk management framework;[\\[7\\]](#_ftn7)\n\n(b) capital management and liquidity management frameworks, as relevant for an APRA-regulated entity other than an RSE licensee; and\n\n(c) business plan and business performance review for an RSE licensee.[\\[8\\]](#_ftn8)\n\n16. An APRA-regulated entity must not assume extraordinary public sector support in its recovery and exit planning.","sortOrder":4},{"sectionNumber":"Role of the Board","sectionType":"part","heading":"Role of the Board","content":"# Role of the Board\n\n17. The Board[\\[9\\]](#_ftn9) of an APRA-regulated entity is ultimately responsible for the oversight of the entity’s recovery and exit planning. The Board of an APRA-regulated entity must:\n\n(a) approve the recovery and exit plan;\n\n(b) oversee reviews of the recovery and exit plan and ensure any findings are addressed by management; and\n\n(c) oversee the execution of any recovery and exit actions.\n\n18. The Board of an SFI must also form a view on the sufficiency of recovery capacity to restore financial resilience in periods of stress. Where the Board views recovery capacity to be insufficient, the SFI must improve its recovery and exit plan or take other actions to improve its financial resilience.","sortOrder":5},{"sectionNumber":"Recovery and exit plan","sectionType":"part","heading":"Recovery and exit plan","content":"# Recovery and exit plan\n\n19. An APRA-regulated entity’s recovery and exit plan must include:\n\n(a) a concise summary that provides a standalone guide to use the recovery and exit plan;\n\n(b) a trigger framework for the early identification and monitoring of stress. The trigger framework must be relevant to the operating environment and risk profile of the APRA-regulated entity, and include a range of early warning indicators to support the effective activation and implementation of the recovery and exit plan;[\\[10\\]](#_ftn10)\n\n(c) governance arrangements for the monitoring of triggers and timely activation of the recovery and exit plan or specific actions within it. Governance arrangements must include clear roles and responsibilities at a senior executive level for the preparation, maintenance and execution of the recovery and exit plan;\n\n(d) credible recovery actions that could be taken to stabilise and restore financial resilience;\n\n(e) credible exit actions that could be taken to effect an orderly and solvent exit from regulated activity; and\n\n(f) a communication strategy to support the execution of recovery and exit actions.\n\n20. An SFI must also include in its recovery and exit plan:\n\n(a) scenario analysis that assesses the effectiveness of the trigger framework, shows how recovery and exit actions could be implemented, and measures the impact and effectiveness of those actions. This analysis must include at least two scenarios that are severe enough to threaten the SFI’s viability, including a systemic and an idiosyncratic stress; and\n\n(b) an assessment of recovery capacity, which is the aggregate impact of plausible recovery actions under each scenario. Recovery capacity must be measured in quantitative terms by calculating the amount of capital and liquidity that can be rebuilt during or following stress, where relevant.\n\n21. An SFI must include, for each recovery and exit action in the plan:\n\n(a) a timeline for the implementation of the action;\n\n(b) analysis of any barriers to implementation, execution risks and key dependencies;\n\n(c) a summary of the preparatory measures needed to support the timely and effective execution of the action; and\n\n(d) where relevant, an estimate of the impact of the action on the capital and liquidity position of the APRA-regulated entity, based on credible assumptions.[\\[11\\]](#_ftn11)\n\n22. APRA may require of an APRA-regulated entity:\n\n(a) the inclusion or exclusion of a particular recovery or exit action within the recovery and exit plan;\n\n(b) the inclusion of an APRA-determined scenario in the recovery and exit plan; or\n\n(c) the use of particular assumptions when assessing recovery capacity.\n\n23. For an APRA-regulated entity other than an RSE licensee, APRA may adjust prudential requirements for capital and liquidity where it assesses there to be material weaknesses in the recovery and exit plan.","sortOrder":6},{"sectionNumber":"Capabilities, monitoring and execution","sectionType":"part","heading":"Capabilities, monitoring and execution","content":"# Capabilities, monitoring and execution\n\n24. An APRA-regulated entity must maintain the capabilities required to execute the recovery and exit plan.[\\[12\\]](#_ftn12)\n\n25. An APRA-regulated entity must take reasonable preparatory steps to support the timely and effective implementation of the recovery and exit plan, in advance of recovery or exit actions being required. This must take into consideration potential legal, financial, operational and structural requirements for executing recovery or exit actions.\n\n26. An APRA-regulated entity must maintain access to sufficient financial resources to support the implementation of recovery and exit actions included in the recovery and exit plan.\n\n27. An APRA-regulated entity must regularly monitor the indicators of stress that would be used to trigger activation of the recovery and exit plan or the specific actions within it.","sortOrder":7},{"sectionNumber":"Testing and review","sectionType":"part","heading":"Testing and review","content":"# Testing and review\n\n28. Unless APRA determines otherwise, an APRA-regulated entity must review and update its recovery and exit plan:\n\n(a) for an SFI, at least annually; and\n\n(b) for a non-SFI, at least every three years.\n\n29. An APRA-regulated entity must review and update its recovery and exit plan to reflect any significant changes in legal or organisational structure, business mix, strategy or risk profile.\n\n30. An SFI must undertake a comprehensive review at least every three years of the effectiveness of the recovery and exit plan and its readiness and capabilities to execute it. The comprehensive review must be conducted by operationally independent, appropriately experienced and competent persons.\n\n31. As part of the comprehensive review, an SFI must conduct operational testing to simulate the use of the recovery and exit plan. This must involve a test of the governance arrangements, communication plan, operational elements of key actions, and internal reporting.","sortOrder":8},{"sectionNumber":"Notification","sectionType":"part","heading":"Notification","content":"# Notification\n\n32. An APRA-regulated entity must provide a copy of the recovery and exit plan to APRA following each review, within three months of the recovery and exit plan being approved by the Board.\n\n33. An APRA-regulated entity must notify APRA if it has activated its recovery and exit plan.","sortOrder":9}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"This appears to be the original determination establishing new prudential standards for recovery and exit planning. The scope aligns with its stated purpose of creating a unified framework across APRA-regulated industries. While it covers five different sectors, this breadth appears to be the intended design rather than scope creep, reflecting APRA's role as a cross-industry prudential regulator."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple overlapping regulatory regimes: applies across five different Acts (Banking, Insurance, Life Insurance, Private Health Insurance, and Superannuation), each with their own terminology and frameworks","Tiered application structure: different rules apply to SFIs vs non-SFIs, with additional carve-outs for Category C insurers, EFLICs, foreign ADIs, and RSE licensees","Extensive cross-referencing: relies on definitions from five separate prudential standards (3PS 001, APS 001, GPS 001, LPS 001, HPS 001)","Conditional logic throughout: numerous 'unless APRA determines otherwise' clauses creating discretionary override powers","Group-level application requirements: complex rules for how requirements apply to 'Head of a group' with substitution of terms ('entity' becomes 'group')","Nested definitions: 'APRA-regulated entity' defined by reference to multiple categories, then subdivided into SFI/non-SFI, with further conditional application","Staggered commencement dates: different start dates for RSE licensees (2025) versus other entities (2024)","Qualitative and quantitative requirements mixed: includes both specific metrics (e.g., $30 billion threshold) and subjective assessments ('appropriate to size, business mix and complexity')"],"plain_english_summary":"APRA-regulated banks, insurers, super funds and other financial institutions must prepare and maintain a recovery-and-exit playbook setting early warning triggers, recovery steps, orderly wind‑down actions, governance and stakeholder communications. Larger, “SFI” firms face stricter testing, annual reviews and stress exercises; smaller firms have lighter review cycles. Boards must approve and APRA receives plans after reviews. The regime aims to ensure troubled firms can restore solvency or exit without causing harm to customers or taxpayers (banks/insurers: 1 Jan 2024; superannuation: 1 Jan 2025)."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":7,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The instrument itself defines the applicable scope (who is covered, SFI thresholds and staged commencement) but does not state that it alters or replaces any prior scope. Based solely on this text, there is no express indication that the scope has changed from an earlier instrument; it establishes current coverage, exclusions and APRA's power to adjust in specific cases (see ss 2–5, 8, 12)."},"complexity_factors":["Wide coverage across multiple regulated sectors (banks, general insurers, life insurers, health insurers, RSEs) and entity types (including NOHCs, foreign branches) (ss 1–4).","SFI / non‑SFI distinction with a quantitative RSE SFI threshold (AUD $30 billion) and APRA discretion to designate SFIs (s 5).","Group-level application where Heads of group must ensure requirements are applied throughout the group and on a group basis (ss 6–7).","Different commencement dates for non-RSE entities and RSE licensees (s 8).","Substantive content and operational requirements: trigger frameworks, governance, communication, credible recovery and exit actions, and capability requirements (ss 13–21, 24–27).","Additional SFI obligations: mandatory scenario analysis, quantitative recovery capacity measurement, and detailed action implementation plans (ss 20–21).","Testing, review and independent comprehensive review requirements for SFIs, including operational testing (ss 28–31).","APRA's powers to adjust/exclude requirements, mandate scenarios or assumptions, and to change prudential capital/liquidity where weaknesses exist (ss 12, 22–23).","Notification and timing obligations for provision of plans and activation notices (ss 32–33).","Interdependency with other prudential definitions and standards referenced (3PS 001, APS/GPS/LPS/HPS 001) which increase cross‑referenced complexity (s 9)."],"plain_english_summary":"This Prudential Standard requires APRA-regulated entities (banks, general and life insurers, private health insurers and superannuation RSEs) to prepare, maintain and test recovery and exit plans that set out how the firm would restore resilience in stress or exit orderly and solvently. Boards must approve and oversee plans; larger or more complex firms (SFIs) face extra scenario-analysis, quantified recovery-capacity and more frequent testing. APRA can adjust or exempt requirements, require scenarios or change prudential settings, and entities must notify APRA of reviews and activations."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/f2023l01380","history":"/api/acts/f2023l01380/history","analysis":"/api/acts/f2023l01380/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/f2023l01380/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/f2023l01380/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/f2023l01380/documents"}}