{"id":"F2008B00419","name":"Australian Research Council Act 2001 - Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development - Funding Rules for Funding commencing in 2006","slug":"f2008b00419","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"repealed","isInForce":false,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":437064,"registerId":"F2008B00419-fast-fetch-1775954088397","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-12","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Australian Research Council Act 2001 - Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development - Funding Rules for Funding commencing in 2006","content":"---\nmeta-content-style-type: text/css\nmeta-content-type: application/xhtml+xml; charset=utf-8\nmeta-generator: Aspose.Words for .NET 20.2\n---\n\n?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\" standalone=\"no\"?>\n\n![](image.001.png)\n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development\n\n                      \n\nFunding Rules for Funding commencing in\n\n2006\n\n\nAustralian Research Council\n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development\n\nFunding Rules for funding commencing in 2006\n\n \n\nTable of Contents\n\nAcronyms.................................................................4\n\n[Key Dates](#_Toc87673485)\n\n[Contacts](#_Toc87673486)\n\n[1. Introduction](#_Toc87673487)\n\n[1.1 NCGP Objectives](#_Toc87673488)\n\n[1.2 Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development](#_Toc87673489)\n\n[1.3 Fundamental principles and requirements](#_Toc87673490)\n\n[1.3.1 Ethics and Research Practices](#_Toc87673491)\n\n[1.3.2 Duplication](#_Toc87673492)\n\n[1.3.3 Conflict of Interest](#_Toc87673493)\n\n[1.3.4 Acknowledging ARC support](#_Toc87673494)\n\n[2. Changes from last year](#_Toc87673495)\n\n[3. Funding](#_Toc87673496)\n\n[3.1 Level of funding](#_Toc87673497)\n\n[3.2 Duration of funding](#_Toc87673498)\n\n[3.3 Types of research supported](#_Toc87673499)\n\n[3.4 Areas of investigation/work not supported](#_Toc87673500)\n\n[3.5 Budget items not supported](#_Toc87673501)\n\n[3.6 Number of grants and applications](#_Toc87673502)\n\n[4. Organisational types, roles and eligibility](#_Toc87673503)\n\n[5. Investigator types, roles and eligibility](#_Toc87673504)\n\n[5.1 Applicant Roles](#_Toc87673505)\n\n[5.2 General Eligibility](#_Toc87673506)\n\n[5.3 Eligibility criteria for Chief Investigators](#_Toc87673507)\n\n[5.4 Eligibility to apply as RC-ATSI](#_Toc87673508)\n\n[5.4.1 Indigenous Australians not eligible to apply as RC-ATSIs](#_Toc87673509)\n\n[5.4.2 Eligibility exemption on grounds of career interruption](#_Toc87673510)\n\n[5.5 Mentors and Supervisors](#_Toc87673511)\n\n[6. Cross-scheme funding](#_Toc87673512)\n\n[6.1 Cross-scheme eligibility](#_Toc87673513)\n\n[6.2 Funding under the ARC or the NHMRC](#_Toc87673514)\n\n[7. Application process](#_Toc87673515)\n\n[7.1 Eligibility exemptions](#_Toc87673516)\n\n[7.2 Applications](#_Toc87673517)\n\n[7.3 Certification](#_Toc87673518)\n\n[7.4 Submission of applications](#_Toc87673519)\n\n[7.4.1 Application format](#_Toc87673520)\n\n[7.4.2 Application form and instructions to applicants](#_Toc87673521)\n\n[7.4.3 How to complete and submit applications](#_Toc87673522)\n\n[7.4.4 Number of copies](#_Toc87673523)\n\n[7.4.5 Closing date for applications](#_Toc87673524)\n\n[8. Selection and approval process](#_Toc87673525)\n\n[8.1 Selection criteria](#_Toc87673526)\n\n[8.1.1 Projects](#_Toc87673527)\n\n[8.1.2 Research Cadetship-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander](#_Toc87673528)\n\n[8.2 Assessment and selection procedure](#_Toc87673529)\n\n[8.2.1 Exclusion](#_Toc87673530)\n\n[8.2.2 Assignment of assessors](#_Toc87673531)\n\n[8.2.3 Applicant rejoinder](#_Toc87673532)\n\n[8.2.4 Recommendations](#_Toc87673533)\n\n[8.3 Offer of grant](#_Toc87673534)\n\n[9. Appeals process](#_Toc87673535)\n\n[10. Administration of grants](#_Toc87673536)\n\n[10.1 Funding Agreement](#_Toc87673537)\n\n[10.1.1 Varying the Funding Agreement](#_Toc87673538)\n\n[10.1.2 Varying the Funding Approval](#_Toc87673539)\n\n[10.1.3 Reports](#_Toc87673540)\n\n[11. Other matters](#_Toc87673541)\n\n[11.1 Applicable law](#_Toc87673542)\n\n[11.2 Confidentiality](#_Toc87673543)\n\n[11.3 Project titles](#_Toc87673544)\n\n[11.4 Intellectual property](#_Toc87673545)\n\n[11.5 Incomplete or misleading information](#_Toc87673546)\n\n[11.6 Insurance and liabilities](#_Toc87673547)\n\n[Appendix 1 Descriptions of National Research Priorities and associated Priority Goals](#_Toc87673548)\n\n[Appendix 2 Eligible Organisations](#_Toc87673549)\n\n[Appendix 3 Notional ARC Fellowship Salaries for Funding Commencing in 2006 (2006$)](#_Toc87673550)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n# Acronyms\n\nThe following acronyms are used in ARC Funding Rules.\n\n \n\nAEST Australian Eastern Standard Time\n\nAEDT Australian Eastern Daylight Saving (Summer) Time\n\nAIMS Australian Institute of Marine Science\n\nANSTO Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation\n\nAPA Australian Postgraduate Award\n\nAPAI Australian Postgraduate Award (Industry)\n\nAPD Australian Postdoctoral Fellowship\n\nAPDC Australian Postdoctoral Fellowship (CSIRO)\n\nAPDI Australian Postdoctoral Fellowship (Industry)\n\nAPF Australian Professorial Fellowship\n\nARC Australian Research Council\n\nARCIF Australian Research Council International Fellowship\n\nARF Australian Research Fellowship\n\nAVCC Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee\n\nCE Centre of Excellence\n\nCoE College of Experts\n\nCI Chief Investigator\n\nCRC Cooperative Research Centre\n\nCSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation\n\nDSTO Defence Science and Technology Organisation\n\nECR Early Career Researcher\n\nERISS Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist\n\nGA Geoscience Australia\n\nGAMS Grant Application Management System\n\nGST Goods and Services Tax\n\nHECS Higher Education Contribution Scheme\n\nKCTR Key Centre for Teaching and Research\n\nLASP Learned Academies Special Projects\n\nLIEF Linkage Infrastructure Equipment and Facilities Program\n\nLIF Linkage Industry Fellowship\n\nNC Network Convenor\n\nNCGP National Competitive Grants Program\n\nNHMRC National Health and Medical Research Council\n\nNP Network Participant\n\nPI Partner Investigator\n\nQEII Queen Elizabeth II Fellowship\n\nRC-ATSI Research Cadetship-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander\n\nRIEF Research Infrastructure Equipment and Facilities Scheme\n\nSPIRT Strategic Partnerships with Industry – Research and Training\n\nSRC Special Research Centres\n\nURL Universal Resource Locator\n\n\n\n\n# Key Dates\n\n \n\nClosing Date for ARC/NHMRC overlap (Section 6.2) – Friday 11 March 2005 5pm AEDT\n\n \n\nClosing Date for eligibility exemption requests - Friday 18 March 2005 5pm AEDT\n\n \n\nDates for award of PhD for RC-ATSI – After 1 March 2002\n\n \n\nClosing Date for applications - Friday 6 May 2005 5pm AEDT\n\n \n\nLast Date for letters requesting non-use of an assessor – Friday 6 May 2005 5pm AEDT\n\n \n\n# Contacts\n\n \n\nThe ARC deals with many thousands of applications each year. Where possible, applicants should direct requests for information to the Research Office or similar unit within their organisation.\n\n \n\nEnquiries about Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development may be addressed to:\n\n \n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development Scheme Coordinator\n\nDisciplines and Programs\n\nAustralian Research Council\n\nGPO Box 2702\n\nCANBERRA  ACT  2601\n\n \n\nEmail: <ncgp@arc.gov.au>\n\nPhone: 02 6284 6600\n\nFax:  02 6284 6638\n\nWeb: [www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\nAustralian Research Council\n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development\n\nFunding Rules for funding commencing in 2006\n\n# 1.  Introduction\n\n \n\nThis document sets out the Funding Rules for Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development, a scheme funded under the Australian Research Council’s National Competitive Grants Program (NCGP), which comply with the requirements of the Australian Research Council Act 2001 (the Funding Rules).\n\n \n\nApplicants should read and understand the entire Funding Rules and the ARC’s standard Funding Agreement [which is available at [www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au)] before submitting an application to the ARC. Applicants are responsible for ensuring that their applications are complete and accurate.\n\n## 1.1 NCGP Objectives\n\nThe Australian Research Council (ARC) is an Australian Government statutory authority established under the Australian Research Council Act 2001 (the ARC Act). The primary functions of the ARC, as specified by the ARC Act, are to make recommendations regarding the funding of research programs, to administer funding to support research programs, and to provide policy advice related to research and research training.\n\n \n\nThe ARC has established a range of competitive funding schemes for the support of research and research training under the framework of the NCGP. A list of current NCGP funding schemes is available on the ARC web site at [www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au).\n\n \n\nBy the operation of a range of funding schemes under the NCGP, the ARC aims to:\n\n \n\n1. Maintain and build on existing research and research training;\n2. Build the scale and focus of research and research training;\n3. Encourage inter-disciplinary approaches to research and research training;\n4. Facilitate collaborative approaches to research and research training; and\n5. Support research and research training in the following National Research Priority Areas:\n  1.  An Environmentally Sustainable Australia\n  2.  Promoting and Maintaining Good Health\n  3.  Frontier Technologies for Building and Transforming Australian Industries\n  4.  Safeguarding Australia\n\n\n \n\nFull descriptions of these National Research Priority Areas and their associated Priority Goals can be found in Appendix 1, and on the ARC web site ([www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au)). Assessment of the degree to which a proposed project would contribute to National Research Priority Areas and Priority Goals may be used as part of the selection process in NCGP schemes.\n\n \n\n \n\n## 1.2 Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development\n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development is a special program within the ARC’s application-based Discovery element.  The program provides support for Indigenous Australian researchers to undertake research projects which may lead to an advance in the understanding of a subject or contribute to the solution of an important practical problem.\n\n \n\nThese Funding Rules are written on the basis that it is the researcher who is the applicant.  However, grants from the ARC are made to organisations (see Section 4), not to the individual researchers.\n\n \n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development aims to: \n\n1. develop the research expertise of Indigenous Australian researchers to a level competitive with mainstream research funding; \n2. support fundamental research and research training by Indigenous Australian  individuals and teams;\n3. provide Indigenous Australian researchers with experience in the preparation of research funding applications; and\n4. expand Australia’s knowledge base and research capability. \n\n\n \n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development provides funding for Indigenous Australian researchers to develop research expertise to a level competitive with mainstream research funding. By supporting early career Indigenous researchers, the program also encourages researchers to participate further in the ARC’s National Competitive Grants Program.\n\n \n\nResearch Cadetships are available under Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development.\n\n \n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development provides funding for research projects undertaken by Indigenous Researchers as part of the requirements of their higher research degrees.\n\n \n\nChief Investigators and Research Cadets must be Indigenous researchers of Australian Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent, who identify and are accepted as such by the community in which they live.\n\n \n\nApplicants may nominate Mentors and, where applicable, Supervisors of their postgraduate research who will support them in developing as researchers. Mentors and Supervisors may be Indigenous, but it is not a requirement that they be Indigenous.\n\n## 1.3  Fundamental principles and requirements\n\n## 1.3.1 Ethics and Research Practices\n\nThe National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) website, <http://www.nhmrc.gov.au>,   provides a series of publications which outline the principles of ethical conduct in research. All research proposals should conform with the principles outlined in:\n\n \n\n1. the Joint NHMRC/AVCC Statement and Guidelines on Research Practice (1997)\n2. as applicable, the NHMRC’s National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans, and\n3. as applicable, the principles outlined in the NHMRC’s codes on animal research.\n\n\n## 1.3.2 Duplication\n\nThe ARC will not duplicate financial assistance for research already funded by the Commonwealth.  For information and guidance on this, see Sections 3.6 and 6.\n\n## 1.3.3 Conflict of Interest\n\nAll applicants associated with ARC funding proposals have an obligation to disclose affiliations with or financial involvement in any organisation with a direct interest in the subject matter or outputs of the researchers. Researchers have an obligation to disclose at the time of applying for an ARC grant, or reporting on it, any conflict of interest which has the potential to influence their research and investigations, publication and media reports, or grant applications.\n\n## 1.3.4 Acknowledging ARC support\n\nThe ARC requires that research funded by the ARC will be appropriately acknowledged. When, at any time during or after completion of a project, the organisation or researcher publishes or produces material such as books, articles, newsletters or other literary or artistic works which relate to the project and/or Fellowship, the organisation or researcher shall acknowledge, at a prominent place in the publication, the support of the ARC in a form acceptable to the ARC. Similar efforts should be made to acknowledge ARC support when participating in television and radio programs, and when interviewed by the print media.\n\n \n\nAdvice on acceptable forms of acknowledgement and use of the logo is provided on the ARC website at [www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au).\n\n# 2.  Changes from last year\n\nA number of revisions have been made to the 2006 Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development Funding Rules.  Changes from the 2005 Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development Funding Rules are listed below:\n\n1. Clause 6.2: Clause added on funding under the ARC and the NHMRC.\n2. Section 11.3: clarification that the ARC has the discretion to change project titles and descriptions.\n3. Appendix 3: specifies the Notional ARC Fellowship salary rates for Fellowships commencing in 2006, and relocation expenses.\n4. The ordering of a number of sections and sub-sections has been altered as part of an ongoing initiative to enhance consistency and common terminology across all NCGP funding schemes.  Minor changes in wording and dates have been introduced throughout the Funding Rules\n\n\n# 3.  Funding\n\n## 3.1 Level of funding\n\nThe minimum grant size is $10,000 per annum. This level refers to the average annual amount that the ARC deems necessary for the project over the full period of the grant (not the average amount applied for, nor the amount sought in the first year).\n\n \n\nThe RC-ATSI salary is commensurate with current ARC APD salary rates (see Appendix 3).\n\n## 3.2 Duration of funding\n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development grants may be awarded for one to three years, subject to parliamentary appropriation. The ARC may award grants for a duration different from that requested.\n\n \n\nThe RC-ATSI supports one or two years’ full-time employment on an approved project. Successful RC-ATSI applicants who hold continuing non-research positions must provide evidence that they have either resigned or been granted leave of absence from the substantive position before commencing the Cadetship.  Applicants may apply for one or two years’ Cadetship but the ARC reserves the right to offer a one-year Cadetship.\n\n## 3.3 Types of research supported\n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development supports excellent research including:\n\n \n\n1. pure basic research which is experimental and theoretical work undertaken to acquire new knowledge primarily for the advancement of knowledge;\n2. strategic basic research which is experimental and theoretical work undertaken to acquire new knowledge directed into specified broad areas that are expected to lead to useful discoveries.  It provides the broad base of knowledge necessary to solve recognised practical problems; and\n3. applied research which is original work undertaken primarily to acquire new knowledge with a specific application in view.  It is undertaken either to determine possible uses for the findings of basic research or to determine new ways of achieving some specific and predetermined objectives.\n\n\n## 3.4 Areas of investigation/work not supported\n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development does not support the following work:\n\n \n\n1. clinical medicine and dental research and training and public health research and training that are covered by the NHMRC;\n2. activities leading solely to the creation or performance of a work of art, including visual art, musical compositions, drama, dance, designs and literary works, for which Commonwealth Government support is provided through the Australia Council for the Arts;\n3. scholarly investigations that, while important in themselves, do not lead to conceptual advances or discoveries, or to novel practical outcomes or applications.  Projects such as uncritical biographical compilations and purely descriptive catalogues or editions that do not involve original research are not funded;\n4. production of teaching materials, even though some research may be involved in their production;\n5. compilation of data, unless this is an integral part of a project, in which case applicants must provide a statement indicating the research objectives to which the data would contribute;\n6. development of research aids and tools (including computer programs), unless they form an integral part of a project, in which case applicants must provide a statement indicating the research objectives to which these activities would contribute.\n\n\n## 3.5 Budget items not supported\n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development does not support the following budget items:\n\n1. Salaries of Chief Investigators. The Commonwealth will not provide support, in whole or in part, to meet the salaries of Chief Investigators. Salaries for RC-ATSIs are provided.\n2. Teaching. Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development funding is not provided to fund teaching.  However, the ARC may consider a request for teaching relief for a period of not more than 6 months a year. The request must be fully justified in terms of achieving a successful outcome for the project.  If approved, the funding contribution is limited to the maximum base rate of $31,070 (2005$) for 6 months, regardless of the level of appointment of the staff member, and is a special condition on the grant.  Only funds specifically approved for teaching relief may be used for that purpose.\n3. Special Studies/Study Leave Programs.  Funds are not provided for travel or related expenses for researchers when on a Special Studies Program.  In well justified cases some specified costs may be supported within a Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development grant provided a CI can show that such expenses are not covered by a Special Studies Program grant and that the research to be undertaken directly relates to the project.  In these cases the use of funds needs to be approved as a special condition of the grant.\n4. International students’ fees and Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) liability.\n\n\nFunds are not provided to pay the fees of international students or the HECS liabilities for Australian students.\n\ne.               Computer facilities for molecular analysis.  Applicants for projects involving molecular biology should be aware that the Australian National Genomic Information Service provides access to a range of databases and a large suite of analysis programs.  As this service is available at modest cost, proposals seeking funding for computer facilities to undertake molecular analysis will have to justify such needs very thoroughly.\n\nf.                Basic facilities.  The administering organisation must certify its agreement to provide the following basic facilities, which will not be funded under Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development:\n\ni. accommodation (e.g. laboratory and office, suitably equipped and furnished in standard ways)\n\nii.            access to standard workshop services (e.g. machine tools and qualified technicians available to each member of staff, according to need, for research)\n\niii.          access to film or music editing facilities\n\niv.          access to a basic library collection\n\nv.            standard reference materials or funds for abstracting services\n\nvi.          adequate access to computers (excluding access to high-performance computers)\n\nvii.        basic computing, word processing and microfilm reading facilities\n\nviii.     use of photocopiers, telephones, mail, fax, email and internet services.\n\ng.              Publication costs.  Publication costs, including page costs, are not funded under Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development.\n\n3.6 Number of grants and applications\n\na. The following limits apply to grants awarded under Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development:\n\ni. A researcher may not hold more than two Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development grants on which he/she is CI or RC-ATSI; and\n\nii. A researcher may not hold more than one Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development grant on which he/she is the sole CI or sole Research Cadet.\n\nb. Applicants may apply for Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development grants only to the extent that, if all were successful, they would not hold more than the maximum number of grants permitted in 2006.\n\nc. Every application must have at least one CI or Research cadetship applicant.\n\nd. In any one year, the ARC will consider no more than two initial applications to Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development from any one researcher. Applicants must ensure that they do not exceed the limit for Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development grants (refer to 3.6.a. i-ii above).\n\ne. Only one application to the Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development may be submitted in respect of a single project in the same calendar year, regardless of any variation in the proposed administering organisation.\n\nf. If two applications are submitted by any one researcher, at least one of these must involve collaboration with another Chief Investigator or RC-ATSI.\n\ng. Submitting similar or duplicate applications may result in the exclusion of all applications involving those applicants. The ARC reserves the right to determine whether applications are duplicates or sufficiently similar to warrant exclusion.\n\nh. Submitting applications that exceed the limits listed above in 3.6.a.i-ii may result in the exclusion of all applications involving that applicant as a CI, PI or RC-ATSI.\n\n# 4.  Organisational types, roles and eligibility\n\n \n\nTo be eligible for consideration, each application in Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development must be submitted by an organisation which is eligible to receive and administer ARC financial assistance (an eligible organisation). Appendix 2 lists the eligible organisations for Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development.\n\n# 5.  Investigator types, roles and eligibility\n\n5.1  Applicant Roles\n\nThere are four applicant roles available under Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development:\n\n \n\na. Chief Investigator (CI);\n\nb. ARC Research Cadetship-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (RC-ATSI);\n\nc. Mentor (M); and\n\nd. Supervisor (S).\n\n \n\nTo be eligible for consideration, an application must have at least one CI or RC-ATSI applicant. \n\n5.2 General Eligibility\n\nTo be eligible to apply for Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development funding as a CI or RC-ATSI, a researcher must be of Australian Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent and must:\n\n \n\na. identify as an Australian Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander; and\n\nb. be accepted as such by the community in which s/he lives or has lived. \n\n \n\nAll CIs and RC-ATSI applicants must be Indigenous Australians.  It is not a requirement that Mentors and Supervisors be Indigenous.\n\n5.3 Eligibility criteria for Chief Investigators\n\nTo be eligible to apply as a Chief Investigator, the applicant must satisfy all of the following criteria:\n\n1. She/he must be an active researcher who takes intellectual responsibility for the project, its conception, any strategic decisions called for in its pursuit and the communication of results.  The applicant must have the capacity to make a serious commitment to the project and cannot assume the role of a supplier of resources for work that will largely be placed in the hands of others. The ARC reserves the right to rule on the question of capacity.\n2. She/he must reside predominantly in Australia for the full term of the grant.  If the applicant does not have permanent resident status she/he must obtain temporary resident status from the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs before taking up the grant.\n3. She/he must meet at least one of the following three criteria:\n\n\n1. be associated with, or employed by an eligible Institution, listed in Appendix 1. The applicant must hold a substantive position at, and/or derive at least 50 per cent of her/his salary from, that Institution; and/or\n2. be associated with, or employed by, an Australian publicly funded organisation not directly funded to carry out research but with research-related purposes and objectives (such as a museum). The applicant must hold a substantive position at, and/or derive at least 50 per cent of her/his salary from, that organisation; and/or\n3. be a currently enrolled candidate for a postgraduate research degree.\n\n\n \n\nd.              Applicants must have completed successfully a research degree or demonstrate equivalent research capacity and experience in their applications, to the satisfaction of the Selection Advisory Committee.  Researchers who are enrolled in higher research degrees may apply for research funding, where the project forms part of their current research towards the degree. In this case, applicants will still need to demonstrate research capacity and experience.\n\ne.               Indigenous Australian researchers are not eligible to apply for funding if they:\n\n1. are undertaking an undergraduate degree or an undergraduate diploma;\n2. hold or have held a nationally competitive grant or fellowship from the ARC (other than an award made under the Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development program) or the NHMRC; or\n3. derive more than 50 per cent of salary from a research organisation outside the higher education sector that is funded primarily for research from State/Territory or Commonwealth Government sources, for example:\n\n\n(a)           Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO);\n\n(b)           Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);\n\n(c)           Geoscience Australia (GA);\n\n(d)           Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO);\n\n(e)           Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS);\n\n(f)            State/Territory Research and Development organisations.\n\n5.4 Eligibility to apply as RC-ATSI\n\nRC-ATSIs support one or two years’ full-time employment on an approved project and are tenable at eligible organisations.\n\n \n\nRC-ATSIs are not eligible to apply for a second RC-ATSI. However, they may apply for an APD (Discovery Projects) or APDI (Linkage Projects) in the final year of their Research Cadetship.\n\nApplicants who apply for a RC-ATSI may apply for both a postdoctoral Cadetship, which provides a salary, and for a research project grant. Applicants who apply for RC-ATSI but not for research funding must demonstrate how their research will be supported.\n\n \n\nTo be eligible to apply as an RC-ATSI, the applicant must meet the following criteria:\n\n1. She/he must be an active researcher who takes intellectual responsibility for the project, its conception, any strategic decisions called for in its pursuit and the communication of results.  The applicant must have the capacity to make a serious commitment to the project and cannot assume the role of a supplier of resources for work that will largely be placed in the hands of others. The ARC reserves the right to rule on the question of capacity;\n2. She/he must reside predominantly in Australia for the full term of the grant.  If the applicant does not have permanent resident status he/she must obtain temporary resident status from the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs before taking up the grant; and\n3. She/he must be a researcher who has been awarded a PhD, or equivalent research doctorate, since 1 March 2002, or has not yet submitted the PhD but will do so before 31 December 2005. If an RC-ATSI is offered, it will be contingent upon receiving official confirmation that the thesis has been submitted by 31 December 2005. The cadetship cannot be taken up until formal advice has been received that the PhD has been awarded. If these conditions have not been satisfied, the offer will be withdrawn.\n\n\n## 5.4.1 Indigenous Australians not eligible to apply as RC-ATSIs\n\nIndigenous Australian researchers are not eligible to apply for a grant if they:\n\n1. are undertaking an undergraduate degree or an undergraduate diploma; and/or\n2. hold or have held a nationally competitive grant or fellowship from the ARC or the NHMRC.\n\n\n## 5.4.2 Eligibility exemption on grounds of career interruption\n\nIn some circumstances, an applicant who is seeking an RC-ATSI may not satisfy the eligibility criteria due to research career interruption (including working in universities in non-research positions). If this is the case, an applicant may apply for an exemption from the eligibility criteria.\n\n \n\nIf, after reading these Funding Rules, a researcher is unsure whether he/she is eligible to apply for an RC-ATSI, she/he must consult the Eligible Organisation’s research office in the first instance.\n\nIf the candidate does require an eligibility exemption, a request must be lodged in writing, through the Eligible Organisation’s research office, with the Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development Program Coordinator, Disciplines and Programs Branch, ARC, before Friday\n\n18 March 2005. The eligibility exemption request must include a statement justifying the applicant’s special circumstances for an eligibility exemption.  The applicant will be advised of the decision as soon as possible to allow time for a detailed application to be completed.\n\nIf an applicant seeking an eligibility exemption fails to meet the above deadline, her/his subsequent application may be deemed ineligible.\n\n5.5 Mentors and Supervisors\n\nAs Discovery Indigenous Researcher Development aims to develop the research expertise of successful applicants, the strength of the research environment and support for the applicant plays an important role in assessing applications. In particular, it is strongly recommended that a Mentor (who does not need to be an Indigenous Australian) be associated with the proposal to provide specific expert advice on the subject of the research. \n\n \n\nIf the proposed research is part of research towards a higher research degree, it is strongly recommended that the applicant’s Supervisor be consulted on the preparation of the application and be associated with the proposal. The roles of Supervisor and Mentor can be filled either by the same individual or by separate persons, and applications may nominate both a mentor and supervisor.\n\n# 6.  Cross-scheme funding\n\n \n\nThe ARC will not duplicate financial assistance for research already funded by the Commonwealth.  The ARC reserves the right to determine if a proposed research project duplicates research already being funded. It may declare ineligible, or reduce funding to, any such proposal.\n\n6.1 Cross-scheme eligibility\n\nIf a funding request for any project, salary or equipment is being submitted to another ARC scheme or to any other funding body, each application must be cross-referenced. Applicants must indicate the level of funding obtained, or being sought, from all other schemes and must list all existing research funding from all sources. If these processes are not observed, the Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development application may be deemed ineligible.\n\n \n\nThe ARC may liaise with other funding agencies to discuss any overlap between applications in order to avoid duplication of funding.\n\n6.2  Funding under the ARC or the NHMRC\n\nIn some instances, it may not be clear whether an application is more appropriately considered by the ARC or the NHMRC.  In these cases, the applicant should forward a two-page summary outlining the proposal through her/his organisation’s Research Office to the ARC by Friday\n\n11 March 2005.  A committee comprising representatives from the ARC and the NHMRC will use the summary to decide which agency is more appropriate for the application.  Each applicant will be advised of the decision approximately 2 weeks after the due date for such requests.\n\n \n\nIf the applicant fails to meet the above deadline, she/he must submit cross-referenced applications, using the same title, to both the ARC and the NHMRC and must declare the dual submission on the ARC application form.  Failure to do so will render the application ineligible.  The ARC will determine if it is the appropriate funding agency. If an application has potential clinical overlap and neither of the above processes is observed, the application may be excluded, regardless of whether or not it falls under the aegis of the ARC.\n\n# 7.  Application process\n\n7.1 Eligibility exemptions\n\nIf an applicant requires an eligibility exemption, a request must be lodged with the ARC by Friday 18 March 2005. See Sections 5.2-5.4 for more information.\n\n7.2 Applications\n\nApplicants must submit their proposal as a mature plan ready for implementation.  The application must contain all the information necessary for assessment of the project without the need for further written or oral explanation, or reference to additional documentation unless requested by the ARC or its College of Experts.\n\n \n\nAll details in the application, including employment details, must be current at the time of submission.\n\n \n\nApplications must not be marked commercial-in-confidence as, if so, they cannot be assessed under the ARC procedures for peer assessment and will be excluded.\n\n7.3 Certification\n\nIt is the legal responsibility of the administering organisation to obtain signatures of all participants named at Part B of the application form.  These signatures are to be retained by the administering organisation which must provide these certifications if requested. A pro forma is available for this purpose on the ARC web site (www.arc.gov.au).\n\n7.4 Submission of applications\n\nApplications under Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development consist of two parts:\n\n \n\n1. Application form: to be completed in the ARC’s Grants Application Management System (GAMS)\n2. Additional text:\n\n\n1. Section B10, ‘Research record relative to opportunities’;\n2. Sections C2 and C3, ‘justifications of funding requested from the ARC’ and ‘details of non-ARC contributions’;\n3. Part E, ‘Project description’.\n4. If applicable, supporting documentation:\n\n\n(a)   Section A7.2, ‘additional detail’ for any participants associated with a Commonwealth Government-funded research Centre; and\n\n(b)   Section D2, ‘reports on ARC grants’.\n\n## 7.4.1    Application format\n\nAll documents must be written in English and must comply strictly with the format and submission requirements.\n\n \n\nAll pages of additional text should be in black type, use a single column and 12-point font size on white A4 paper, be printed on one side only and unbound, with at least 2 cm margins on each side.  As applications are scanned electronically, applicants must use a highly legible font type, such as Arial, Courier, Palatino, Times New Roman and Helvetica. Variants such as mathematical typesetting languages may also be used.  References may be reproduced in 10-point font size.  Colour graphs or colour photographs may be included but they will be reproduced in black and white and the reproduction quality may be degraded. Note: fine graphics and grey scale may not be precisely reproduced due to low resolution scanning of PDFs.\n\n## 7.4.2     Application form and instructions to applicants\n\nApplicants must use the application form completed within GAMS at the ARC web site ([www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au) ).\n\n \n\nApplicants should note that a separate document, Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development Instructions to Applicants for Funding Commencing in 2006, will be available from [www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au)  to assist in preparing applications.\n\n \n\n \n\n## 7.4.3     How to complete and submit applications\n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development application forms are produced using the ARC’s web-based GAMS. Applicants should submit their applications through their Eligible Organisation’s Research Office by their internal closing date. Research Offices have access to GAMS and will allocate GAMS User IDs and passwords to enable applicants at their organisation to access the system and create applications. If an applicant has previously been allocated access to GAMS, her/his User ID and password should still be current. Applicants who may not have a GAMS ID should first contact their Research Office/GAMS Contact. If they do not have a Research Office they should email gamsids@arc.gov.au.\n\n \n\nResearch Offices should submit application forms in GAMS and forward the full paper application and copy which must identically match the contents of the GAMS application form. Applications should be sent:\n\n \n\n \n\nby mail, to\n\n \n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development Scheme Coordinator\n\nAustralian Research Council\n\nGPO Box 2702\n\nCANBERRA  ACT  2601\n\n \n\nby courier, to\n\n \n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development Scheme Coordinator\n\nAustralian Research Council\n\nGeoscience Australia Building\n\nCnr Hindmarsh Drive and\n\nJerrabomberra Avenue\n\nSYMONSTON  ACT  2609\n\n## 7.4.4    Number of copies\n\nAn original and one identical paper copy are required.  The application must be clipped with NAL clips, not stapled.  The application form completed in GAMS should be submitted with the additional text, including supporting documentation, interleaved appropriately and the pages numbered sequentially starting at the beginning of the application (see Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development Instructions to Applicants for Funding Commencing in 2006).\n\n## 7.4.5    Closing date for applications\n\nPaper originals of applications for Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development must be received by the ARC, and the application form completed using GAMS must be submitted, by 5.00 pm (AEDT) Friday 6 May 2005. Applications may be withdrawn but may not be changed after submission. Additions, deletions and modifications will not be accepted after submission. Applications received after 5.00 pm (AEDT) Friday 6 May 2005 will not be accepted.\n\n \n\nThe ARC may, in its absolute discretion, extend closing dates for applications. In such cases, the ARC will advise potential and registered applicants via its website [www.arc.gov.au].\n\n# 8.  Selection and approval process\n\n8.1 Selection criteria\n\n## 8.1.1    Projects\n\na. Primary criteria in considering applications are:\n\ni. the quality of the research project being proposed;\n\nii. the quality of the researcher(s) proposing the research project; and\n\niii. the quality of the research environment and/or mentor.\n\nb. Other considerations may be:\n\ni. the probable impact of a successful outcome for the research project; and/or\n\nii. the extent to which the successful completion of the research project will train and equip the researcher to compete for mainstream research funding.\n\nIf an application is judged to be outside the scope of the Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development, it may be referred for consideration under other ARC programs.\n\n## 8.1.2    Research Cadetship-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander\n\nRC-ATSI applicants must provide additional details, in the text of their applications (at Section B9.6), of\n\n \n\na. their contribution to the project, and\n\nb. the research environment of the their host Institution.\n\n8.2 Assessment and selection procedure\n\nAssessment of applications is undertaken by the ARC, which has the right to make decisions solely on the basis of its expertise, and which may:\n\n \n\na. exclude ineligible applications;\n\nb. assign independent readers/assessors to review the applications;\n\nc. seek applicants’ comments on assessors’ reports;\n\nd. rank each application relative to the others on the basis of the application, the assessors’ e.              reports and the applicant’s rejoinder/response to these assessments; \n\ne. assess and recommend budgets; and\n\nf. prepare funding recommendations that are submitted to the ARC Board.\n\n \n\nThe ARC has procedures for managing any organisational and personal conflicts of interest experienced by College of Experts members, and for enabling members to withdraw from the assessment process of particular applications.\n\n## 8.2.1    Exclusion\n\nExclusion of applications by the ARC may take place at any time during the selection process.  Applications which contravene the Funding Rules in any way may be excluded. The ARC will determine if the breach of the Funding Rules has a potential material impact on the assessment of the application.  If it is so determined the application will be excluded. Grounds for exclusion include, but are not limited to:\n\n \n\n1. failing to submit the application through the appropriate Research Office/Chief Executive Officer for certification;\n2. submitting similar or duplicate applications;\n3. exceeding the limits on the number of applications permissible;\n4. not meeting the eligibility criteria;\n5. submitting applications in clinical medicine and dental research (refer to Section 6.2);\n6. providing incomplete, inaccurate or misleading information (refer to Section 11.5);\n7. designating all or any part of the application as ‘commercial-in-confidence’;\n8. not meeting the funding threshold when inappropriate budget items are removed.\n\n\n## 8.2.2    Assignment of assessors\n\nEach application not initially excluded may be assessed by a number of external assessors. Assessors will be drawn from a range of organisations to avoid potential conflicts of interest. Applications will be assessed against the selection criteria and the reports by the assessors must include written comment.\n\n \n\nThe ARC reserves the right to make decisions based on any number of assessments or solely on the assessment of the ARC.\n\n \n\nApplicants may name any person whom they do not wish to assess the application.  Detailed written justification, which will be considered by the ARC, must be submitted through the administering organisation’s Research Office, in a separate letter, and it must not accompany the application.  The letter must be received by the closing date for applications, Friday 6 May 2005, and be sent to:\n\n \n\n \n\nDiscovery Indigenous Researchers Development Scheme Coordinator\n\nDisciplines and Programs\n\nAustralian Research Council\n\nGPO Box 2702\n\nCANBERRA  ACT  2601\n\n \n\nThe ARC will consider the justification put forward by an applicant to exclude any person as an assessor.  However, the ARC may not give effect to an applicant’s request.\n\n## 8.2.3    Applicant rejoinder\n\nThe assessors’ textual comments will be provided to the administering organisation allowing the opportunity for a rejoinder to the comments. To ensure impartiality, assessors’ names are not provided to the applicant. At the same time, the ARC may add questions to the assessments sent to the applicants for rejoinder. Applicants have 2 weeks in which to submit a rejoinder to the ARC. Rejoinders will not be accepted after the nominated closing date for rejoinder submissions.\n\n## 8.2.4    Recommendations\n\nThe ARC’s recommendations are submitted to the ARC Board and, subject to its views, to the Minister for Education, Science and Training for consideration. The Minister determines which applications will be offered funding.\n\n8.3 Offer of grant\n\nSuccessful administering organisations will be notified in a letter of offer that will indicate the funding to be provided and include the Funding Agreement.\n\n# 9.  Appeals process\n\n \n\nAppeals will be considered only against process issues and not against committee recommendations or assessor ratings and comments. \n\n \n\nAppeals must be made on the appeals form available from the ARC website ([www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au)). The form must be lodged through the Administering Organisation’s Research Office and be\n\nreceived within 28 days of the date on the letter notifying the outcome of applications, by:\n\n \n\nThe Appeals Officer\n\nAustralian Research Council\n\nGPO Box 2702\n\nCANBERRA  ACT  2601\n\n# 10.  Administration of grants\n\n10.1 Funding Agreement\n\nFinancial assistance may not be expended before the Funding Agreement is signed by the organisation and the ARC, and until then the ARC will not recognise the project as having begun.\n\n \n\nSuccessful applicants should familiarise themselves with the Funding Agreement. They must accept the terms of the Funding Agreement and the administering organisation must sign the Funding Agreement before funds can be paid.\n\n \n\nProjects must commence as required by the Funding Agreement.\n\n \n\nAdministering organisations should note that the Funding Agreement covers post-award management, including reporting requirements and financial management.  The draft Funding Agreement can be viewed on the ARC website ([www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au)).\n\n## 10.1.1    Varying the Funding Agreement\n\nRequests to vary the Funding Agreement must be forwarded in writing by the organisation’s Research Office to the ARC. Forms are available for variation requests on the ARC website ([www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au)).\n\n## 10.1.2    Varying the Funding Approval\n\nRequests to vary the Funding Approval must be forwarded in writing by the administering organisation’s Research Office, to the ARC. \n\n \n\nThe Funding Approval may be varied by varying the amount of financial assistance, the duration of financial assistance, the name of the person leading the research program and the name of the organisation receiving financial assistance.\n\n \n\nThe Funding Approval may be varied where:\n\n \n\n1. the organisation’s involvement with the research program ends or substantially changes;\n2. the research program changes so that it is no longer consistent with the description in the Funding Approval;\n3. the person named in the Funding Approval as the person leading the research program ceases to lead the program;\n4. association with any of the collaborating partner organisations involved in the research program ends, or the collaborating partner organisation(s) substantially changes its involvement with the program.\n\n\n## 10.1.3    Reports\n\nAdministering organisations are required to submit reports concerning funded projects to the ARC, in the format and by the due dates detailed in the Funding Agreement.\n\n# 11. Other matters\n\n11.1 Applicable law\n\nThe ARC is required to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1988 and the Freedom of Information Act 1982.\n\n11.2 Confidentiality\n\nInformation contained in applications is regarded as confidential unless otherwise stated and, subject to the need to provide applications to assessors, and statutory requirements for the ARC to provide information to Parliament and other organisations, applications will be received and treated as confidential.\n\n \n\nNotwithstanding the above, the ARC may publicise and report offers or awards of funding, including information about the proposed research, the name and organisation of any applicant, the identity of the administering organisation and any other organisation involved in the project, the title and summary descriptions of the project and its intended outcomes, and the level and nature of financial assistance from the ARC.\n\n11.3 Project titles\n\nIf the ARC judges that a project title and description do not adequately reflect the objectives and outcomes sought, the ARC reserves the right to change the project title and description.\n\n11.4 Intellectual property\n\nApplicants must agree to comply with the National Principles of Intellectual Property Management for Publicly Funded Research (available at [www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au)) and act in accordance with any intellectual property policies of the applicant’s organisation.\n\n11.5 Incomplete or misleading information\n\nIt is a serious offence to provide false or misleading information to the Commonwealth.\n\n \n\nIf an application is incomplete, inaccurate or contains misleading information, it may be excluded from any further consideration for funding.\n\n \n\nIf the ARC believes that omissions or inclusion of misleading information are intentional, or if there is evidence of malpractice, the ARC will refer the matter for investigation with a view to prosecution under Commonwealth criminal law.  The Commonwealth is committed to protecting its revenue, expenditure and property from any attempt, by members of the public, contractors, sub-contractors, agents, intermediaries or its own employees, to gain financial or other benefits by deceit.\n\n \n\nExamples of malpractice include, but are not restricted to:\n\n \n\n1. providing fictitious track records; or\n2. falsifying claims in publications records (such as describing a paper as accepted for publication when it has only been submitted).\n\n\n11.6 Insurance and liabilities\n\nOrganisations are subject to the liability, indemnity and insurance provisions of the Funding Agreement. The draft Funding Agreement can be viewed on the ARC website ([www.arc.gov.au](http://www.arc.gov.au)).\n\n \n\n\nAppendix 1:  Descriptions of National Research Priorities and associated Priority Goals\n\n \n\nResearch Priority 1: An Environmentally Sustainable Australia\n\nTransforming the way we utilise our land, water, mineral and energy resources through a better understanding of human and environmental systems and the use of new technologies.\n\nNatural resources have traditionally fuelled our national and regional economies. They have the potential to generate further wealth and employment opportunities in the future. But our natural resources and biodiversity must be used on a sustainable basis so that the benefits continue to be enjoyed by future generations.\n\nAustralia faces significant environmental challenges:\n\n \n\n- Efficient and sustainable water use is a critically important issue for our economic and social development;\n- Significant land degradation issues, such as salinity, need to be arrested to underpin our agricultural production systems;\n- Climate change can be expected to have complex, long-term consequences for the environment, for our agricultural and marine production systems and for communities; and\n- The cleanliness and efficiency of our energy production systems should be enhanced.\n\n\nThere is substantial effort underway to develop more efficient water utilisation practices, to protect our rivers and groundwater resources, and to protect and remediate our fragile soils.\n\nOur agricultural and mining industries are being transformed through the adoption of new technologies, and the development of new types of foods.\n\nThis will help to revitalise our regional communities and generate substantial export earnings for the nation over the coming decades.\n\nThe Government is committed to meeting the greenhouse gas emissions target set for Australia at Kyoto.\n\nAustralia is well placed to take an international lead in developing new and improved energy technologies and in capturing and ‘sequestering’ carbon dioxide.\n\nOther opportunities lie in managing and using our unique, rich land- and marine-based biodiversity, and in developing our deep earth resources.\n\nAustralia has a strong record of achievement in research in fields in the natural sciences, such as agriculture, natural resource management, climate change, horticulture, forestry, mining, energy, and marine sciences, as well as in the social sciences and humanities.\n\nWe must build on these strengths to improve our competitive advantages while enhancing our understanding of natural systems and the interplay of human activities.\n\nIn particular, there needs to be an increased understanding of the contributions of human behaviour to environmental and climate change, and on appropriate adaptive responses and strategies.\n\nTo understand and manage these complex interactions better will require significant collaboration within the research community and with other stakeholders.\n\nPriority goals for research fall in the seven areas of water utilisation, transforming resource-based industries, overcoming land degradation, developing cleaner, more efficient fuels and energy sources, managing biodiversity, deep earth resources and responding to climate change and variability.\n\n \n\nPriority Goals\n\n \n\n- Water – a critical resource\n\n\nSustainable ways of improving water productivity, using less water in agriculture and other industries, providing increased protection of rivers and groundwater and the re-use of urban and industrial waste waters.\n\n \n\nAustralia is one of the driest continents and is dependent upon access to freshwater supplies for economic and social development. It has a complex geological structure, a highly variable climate, unique ecosystems, flora and fauna and a distinctive indigenous and settler history. Enhancing our understanding of the links between these factors and water availability will result in a better understanding of sustainable water management practices.\n\n \n\n- Transforming existing industries\n\n\nNew technologies for resource-based industries to deliver substantial increases in national wealth while minimising environmental impacts on land and sea.\n\n \n\nResource-based industries underpin much of Australia’s prosperity and have the potential to do so in the future. For example, Australia remains highly prospective for minerals discoveries and highly attractive for the development of new era foods from agricultural and marine sources. Our competitive advantage and national well being will depend on research and on the development and adoption of new technologies.\n\n \n\n- Overcoming soil loss, salinity and acidity\n\n\nIdentifying causes and solutions to land degradation using a multidisciplinary approach to restore land surfaces.\n\n \n\nThe Australian landscape is fragile: soil salinity, acidity, and nutrient levels pose significant, long term challenges for agriculture and the environment. Research is helping to find solutions to these problems. For example, the National Land and Water Resources Audit shows the extent of salinity, soil erosion and soil acidification in the Australian environment and illustrates Australia’s leading edge in national mapping of critical resource data. Further multidisciplinary effort is required to develop sustainable land management practices that are appropriate for Australian conditions and mitigate major land degradation processes and increase biodiversity.\n\n \n\n- Reducing and capturing emissions in transport and energy generation\n\n\nAlternative transport technologies and clean combustion and efficient new power generation systems and capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide.\n\n \n\nAustralia is well positioned to produce world class solutions to reduce and capture greenhouse gas emissions and the Government is committed to meeting the emissions target set for Australia at Kyoto. We are also well placed to develop alternative energy technologies and ecologically sustainable transport and power generation systems.\n\n \n\n- Sustainable use of Australia’s biodiversity\n\n\nManaging and protecting Australia’s terrestrial and marine biodiversity both for its own value and to develop long term use of ecosystem goods and services ranging from fisheries to ecotourism.\n\n \n\nAustralia has a unique and rich flora and fauna. Many of our complex ecosystems – on which our agricultural, fisheries and tourism industries depend - have adapted to events such as drought and fire, and have been shaped by indigenous and settler management practices. There is a need for a more comprehensive understanding of these natural systems and the interplay with human activities, and the effects of management and protection measures.\n\n \n\n- Developing deep earth resources\n\n\nSmart high-technology exploration methodologies, including imaging and mapping the deep earth and ocean floors, and novel efficient ways of commodity extraction and processing (examples include minerals, oil and gas) while minimising negative ecological and social impacts.\n\n \n\nMany of Australia’s known mineral assets may be nearly exhausted within the next decade. New land-based deposits are believed to be buried deeper in the crust and the deep marine areas surrounding Australia are also largely unexplored. New technologies, such as remote sensing, indicate scientists are on the brink of being able to ‘see’ inside the earth and identify deeply buried deposits.\n\n \n\n- Responding to climate change and variability\n\n\nIncreasing our understanding of the impact of climate change and variability at the regional level across Australia, and addressing the consequences of these factors on the environment and on communities.\n\n \n\nAustralia already has a highly variable climate, and climate change can be expected to have further significant impacts. It is important to enhance our understanding of the consequences of climate change and variability at the regional level across Australia, and the implications for the environment and for communities. It is also important to explore beneficial adaptation strategies to climate change and variability to ensure ongoing social, economic and environmental well being.\n\n \n\nResearch Priority 2: Promoting and Maintaining Good Health\n\n \n\nPromoting good health and well being for all Australians.\n\nAverage life expectancies have increased markedly in recent decades. Australians also expect to lead longer and healthier lives in the future, and to remain productive and independent over an extended period.\n\nEnabling individuals and families to make choices that lead to healthy, productive and fulfilling lives will yield economic and social benefits and add materially to national well being.\n\nAustralians expect that their children and grandchildren should have a healthy start to life.\n\nDeveloping strategies to promote the healthy development of young Australians, and addressing the causes and reducing the impact of the genetic, social and environmental factors which diminish their life potential will be critical.\n\nA revolution is also underway at the other end of the life cycle. Australia, like many other developed nations, is undergoing a major demographic shift involving significant growth in the aged population.\n\nTo meet this challenge, it will be important to promote healthy ageing by developing better social and medical strategies to ensure that older Australians enjoy healthy and productive lives.\n\nInformed insights into the causes of disease and of mental and physical degeneration will contribute to the achievement of this goal.\n\nAll Australians stand to benefit from preventive healthcare through the adoption of healthier attitudes, habits and lifestyles.\n\nEvidence-based preventive interventions may help reduce the incidence and severity of many diseases, including major health problems such as cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, mental ill-health, obesity, diabetes, asthma and chronic inflammatory conditions. These could include interventions that reduce exposure to contamination of the physical environment (eg air pollution).\n\nImprovements in the health and well being of the young, of older Australians and in preventive healthcare will be underpinned by research.\n\nHowever, while Australia has an enviable record in health and medical research, the research effort is spread across the many universities, hospitals and health and medical research institutes, resulting in critical mass only in limited areas of research.\n\nThere is also a need to draw on multidisciplinary approaches that include research contributions from the social sciences and humanities.\n\nThis priority is designed to promote health and prevent disease through a more focused and collaborative effort.\n\nPriority goals for research fall in the four areas of a healthy start to life, ageing well, ageing productively, preventive healthcare and strengthening Australia’s social and economic fabric.\n\n \n\nPriority Goals\n\n \n\n- A healthy start to life\n\n\nCounteracting the impact of genetic, social and environmental factors which predispose infants and children to ill health and reduce their well being and life potential.\n\n \n\nHuman health in the developing foetus and in early childhood is critical to the future well being of the adult. Research shows that health and well being in early childhood is predictive of later positive outcomes, and that health in middle and late childhood is also crucial. This goal supports the Government’s National Agenda for Early Childhood initiative.\n\n \n\n- Ageing well, ageing productively\n\n\nDeveloping better social, medical and population health strategies to improve the mental and physical capacities of ageing people.\n\n \n\nAustralia’s population is ageing, with a significant projected increase in the number of people aged over 65 and over 85. While Australia is relatively well placed compared with many OECD nations, major shifts in cultural expectations and attitudes about ageing are necessary to respond constructively, at both an individual and population level. A healthy aged population will contribute actively to the life of the nation through participation in the labour market or through voluntary work. This goal supports the Government’s National Strategy for an Ageing Australia.\n\n \n\n- Preventive healthcare\n\n\nNew ethical, evidence-based strategies to promote health and prevent disease through the adoption of healthier lifestyles and diet, and the development of health-promoting products.\n\n \n\nPreventive healthcare research will improve the prediction and prevention of disease and injury for all Australians through the adoption of healthier behaviours, lifestyles and environments. Research will generate an improvement in the design, delivery and uptake of programmes such as exercise-based rehabilitation. There are several major disease targets amenable to immediate study, such as cardiovascular health, neurodegenerative diseases, mental ill-health, obesity, diabetes, asthma and chronic inflammatory conditions. Research on prevention will emphasise interdisciplinary approaches, including research on ethics, drawing on contributions from the social sciences and humanities, as well as from the health and medical sciences. It will also focus on developing new health promoting foods and nutraceuticals. This goal supports the Government’s Focus on Prevention initiative.\n\n \n\n- Strengthening Australia's social and economic fabric\n\n\nUnderstanding and strengthening key elements of Australia's social and economic fabric to help families and individuals live healthy, productive, and fulfilling lives.\n\n \n\nLiving in today's society involves a complex web of choices, yet many of the traditional support structures are weaker than they have been in the past. Enabling people to make choices that lead to positive pathways to self reliance and supportive family structures is more important than ever. The interactions between the social safety net, social and economic participation, financial incentives and community and private sources of support are critical in helping people maximise their potential and achieve good, healthy, lifetime outcomes. In the decade ahead, it will be vital to understand and support the drivers for workforce participation and the broader social and economic trends influencing Australian families and communities. This goal supports the Government's welfare reform and participation agendas. Research in this area will emphasise interdisciplinary approaches, drawing on contributions from the economic, behavioural and social sciences\n\n \n\n\nResearch Priority 3: Frontier Technologies for Building and Transforming Australian Industries\n\n \n\nStimulating the growth of world-class Australian industries using innovative  technologies developed from cutting-edge research.\n\nProgress and wealth often derive from the unforeseen application of new discoveries. Australia must be at the leading edge if it is to stay abreast of international developments and take advantage of opportunities.\n\nOur national capabilities in emerging sciences and their underpinning disciplines determine our capacity to develop and implement new technologies. Australia has a strong base of expertise, skills and technological capacities in the fundamental sciences and key technologies.\n\nOur strengths are in a wide range of areas such as biotechnology, material sciences, information and communications technology (ICT), photonics, nanotechnology and sensor technology.\n\nICT is currently the critical enabling technology and is a major contributor to national productivity and growth.\n\nBut breakthrough science underpins technological advancements in many areas and Australia needs to foster an environment that stimulates creativity and innovation.\n\nApplications for frontier technologies are potentially very large. Australia has the capacity to exploit niche markets for new products and services.\n\nAustralia also has an enviable track record as an innovator and developer of advanced materials and must grasp the opportunity to stay ahead.\n\nSmart information use involving improved data management, intelligent transport systems and digital media to develop creative applications for digital technologies provides huge opportunities to improve the performance of key Australian industries.\n\nAustralia needs to invest in this research area as it is fundamental to our future competitiveness and well being.\n\nThis priority will help to strengthen the capacity of Australian researchers to participate in new areas of research, enhance Australia’s international scientific reputation, stimulate local expertise, and help create vibrant new industries.\n\nA better understanding of the conditions that are conducive to innovation will ensure that Australia’s investment in research will maximise the benefits for Australia.\n\nEnhanced research effort will also be achieved through initiatives that develop a critical mass of researchers in key areas.\n\nPriority goals for research fall in the five areas of breakthrough science, frontier technologies, advanced materials, smart information use, and promoting an innovation culture and economy.\n\n \n\nPriority Goals\n\n \n\n- Breakthrough science\n\n\nBetter understanding of the fundamental processes that will advance knowledge and facilitate the development of technological innovations.\n\n \n\nBreakthrough science underpins technological innovation across a range of industries critical to maintaining Australia’s position as a developed country. Some examples include bio-, cultural- and geo-informatics, nano-assembly and quantum computing. Technological advances are often unexpected and a strong foundation in mathematics and the fundamental sciences will provide an environment that fosters creativity and innovation. Early participation in leading edge areas of research will enable Australian researchers to benefit more fully from international developments.\n\n \n\n- Frontier technologies\n\n\nEnhanced capacity in frontier technologies to power world-class industries of the future and build on Australia’s strengths in research and innovation (examples include nanotechnology, biotechnology, ICT, photonics, genomics/phenomics, and complex systems).\n\n \n\nThe potential applications of frontier technologies across a range of industries in Australia are vast. Australia has significant capacity to exploit niche markets for new products and services emerging from frontier technologies. Australia has world-class research expertise in many such areas. Some examples include nanotechnology, biotechnology, ICT, photonics, genomics and phenomics. Also important are advanced frameworks such as complex systems in which these technologies are applied. Future directions in this priority area need to target the cutting-edge science critical for each emerging technology.\n\n \n\n- Advanced materials\n\n\nAdvanced materials for applications in construction, communications, transport, agriculture and medicine (examples include ceramics, organics, biomaterials, smart material and fabrics, composites, polymers and light metals).\n\n \n\nThe development of advanced materials will underpin growth in many areas of industrial and economic activity in Australia. Australia has substantial infrastructure in this area and an enviable track record as an innovator and developer of advanced materials. The era of advanced materials is just beginning, in spite of the tremendous progress in recent years. Substantial scientific and technological challenges remain ahead, including the development of more sophisticated and specialised materials. Some examples include ceramics, organics, biomaterials, smart materials and fabrics, composites, polymers, and light metals.\n\n \n\n- Smart information use\n\n\nImproved data management for existing and new business applications and creative applications for digital technologies (examples include e-finance, interactive systems, multi-platform media, creative industries, digital media creative design, content generation and imaging).\n\n \n\nICT applications are providing huge opportunities to deliver new systems, products, business solutions, and to make more efficient use of infrastructure. Examples include e-finance, multi-media, content generation and imaging. Improved data management is central to the future competitiveness of key industries such as agriculture, biotechnology, finance, banking, education, transport, government, and health and ‘info-tainment’. The ability of organisations to operate virtually and collaborate across huge distances in Australia and internationally hinges on our capabilities in this area. The media and creative industries are among the fastest growing sectors of the new economy. Research is needed to exploit the huge potential in the digital media industry.\n\n \n\n- Promoting an innovation culture and economy\n\n\nMaximising Australia’s creative and technological capability by understanding the factors conducive to innovation and its acceptance.\n\n \n\nUnderstanding the factors that lead to highly creative and innovative ideas and concepts, and the conditions that lead to their introduction, transfer and uptake is critical for any nation that aspires to lead the world in breakthrough science, frontier technologies, and in other forms of innovation. Promoting an innovation culture and economy requires research with a focus on developing and fostering human talent, societal and cultural values favourable to creativity and innovation, and structures and processes for encouraging and managing innovation.  \n\n \n\nResearch Priority 4:  Safeguarding Australia\n\n \n\nSafeguarding Australia from terrorism, crime, invasive diseases and pests, strengthening our understanding of Australia’s place in the region and the world, and securing our infrastructure, particularly with respect to our digital systems.\n\nThe importance of security and safety to Australia has been underscored by recent events.\n\nAustralia has to be capable of anticipating and tackling critical threats to society, strategic areas of the national economy and the environment.\n\nThe threats can potentially come from within and outside Australia.\n\nThe world is now characterised by the widespread and rapid movements of people, digitally coded data, goods and services, and exotic biological agents.\n\nCritical infrastructure in Australia is increasingly dependent on digital technology for its management and integration.\n\nInformation protection and the integrity of security systems are now more important than ever before.\n\nIt is also necessary to protect the status of Australia as a nation free of many of the diseases affecting primary production around the world.\n\nTerrorism has emerged as a very real global threat and crime is taking a significant toll on Australian society and economy.\n\nMaintaining the operational advantage of Australia’s defence forces through superior capabilities is also fundamental to our national security.\n\nEnhancing our nation’s understanding of social, political and cultural issues will help Australia to engage with our neighbours and the wider global community and to respond to emerging issues.\n\nLeading edge research in Australia is already yielding high dividends and as a national research priority will improve the effectiveness of that contribution.\n\nStronger research capabilities will ensure that solutions are tailored to Australia’s unique circumstances, reflecting its geographic features and small population.\n\nGreater collaboration within the research community and with other stakeholders will allow us to better understand and manage potential threats to Australia.\n\nHarnessing the knowledge and capabilities across Australia offers us the best chance of developing innovative and rapid solutions to serious threats.\n\nAustralia’s international relations and its regional influence will be strengthened through new collaborative approaches and new science and technologies that enhance security and safety.\n\nThe heightened interest in personal and electronic security across the world also provides opportunities for Australian solutions.\n\nPriority goals for research fall in the five areas of critical infrastructure, understanding our region and the world, protecting Australia from invasive diseases and pests, protecting Australia from terrorism and crime, and transformational defence technologies.\n\n \n\nPriority goals\n\n \n\n- Critical infrastructure\n\n\nProtecting Australia’s critical infrastructure including our financial, energy, communications, and transport systems.\n\n \n\nProtecting our critical infrastructure is important to national security and to the social and economic well being of Australia. An important aspect of this priority goal is e-security which is an enabler of e-commerce. Maintaining a critical mass of research in e-security will be essential in providing Australia with the tools to protect our way of life.\n\n \n\n- Understanding our region and the world\n\n\nEnhancing Australia’s capacity to interpret and engage with its regional and global environment through a greater understanding of languages, societies, politics and cultures.\n\n \n\nSocial, cultural and religious issues are of growing significance due to the insecurities of globalisation and the increasing role of non-state players in the security environment. Australia’s capacity to interpret and engage with its regional and global environment will be substantially improved by enhancing its research base in apposite languages, societies and cultures. An approach that enhances Australia’s capacity to interpret itself to the rest of the world is also needed.\n\n \n\n- Protecting Australia from invasive diseases and pests\n\n\nCounteract the impact of invasive species through the application of new technologies and by integrating approaches across agencies and jurisdictions.\n\n \n\nAustralia is free of many of the pests and diseases affecting primary production around the world. This status needs to be protected as the introduction of exotic species has the potential to adversely affect our exports and the environment. Australia already has strong skills and expertise in this area of research and further work will offer immediate benefits to the community. A greater level of coordination of our research effort will mean that Australia can more effectively develop innovative and rapid solutions to serious threats.\n\n \n\n- Protecting Australia from terrorism and crime\n\n\nBy promoting a healthy and diverse research and development system that anticipates threats and supports core competencies in modern and rapid identification techniques.\n\n \n\nProtecting Australia from terrorism is now more important than ever before in light of recent events and our involvement in the ‘war on terror’. The new threat requires a more sophisticated response which should harness Australia’s research capabilities, and which will focus on all phases of counter-terrorism; prevention, preparedness, detection, response and recovery. Crime takes a significant toll on Australian society and economy. The June 2000 report from the Prime Minister’s Science, Engineering and Innovation Council estimated that crime costs Australia at least $18 billion per annum. Personal identification, information protection and the integrity of security systems are fundamental towards ensuring the national security of Australia. An effective solution will include building on Australia’s existing strengths in rapid detection using new analytical technologies and managing significant data collections.\n\n \n\n- Transformational defence technologies\n\n\nTransform military operations for the defence of Australia by providing superior technologies, better information and improved ways of operation.\n\n \n\nAustralia has a small defence force to protect a large continent and a substantial maritime region of responsibility. Its operational advantage has been maintained through a superior capability which is dependent on leveraging innovative technologies. Although some benefits can be gained from overseas research, Australia has to conduct its own research to address uniquely Australian demands. A systems approach which harnesses the research capabilities of all stakeholders is essential to the successful development and introduction of innovative technologies.\n\n\nAppendix 2.  Eligible Organisations\n\n \n\nA: Higher Education Organisations\n\nNew South Wales\n\nCharles Sturt University\n\nMacquarie University\n\nSouthern Cross University\n\nThe University of New England\n\nThe University of New South Wales\n\nThe University of Newcastle\n\nThe University of Sydney\n\nUniversity of Technology, Sydney\n\nUniversity of Western Sydney\n\nUniversity of Wollongong\n\nVictoria\n\nDeakin University\n\nLa Trobe University\n\nMelbourne College of Divinity\n\nMonash University\n\nRMIT University\n\nSwinburne University of Technology\n\nThe University of Melbourne\n\nUniversity of Ballarat\n\nVictoria University of Technology\n\nQueensland\n\nBond University\n\nCentral Queensland University\n\nGriffith University\n\nJames Cook University\n\nQueensland University of Technology\n\nThe University of Queensland\n\nThe University of the Sunshine Coast\n\nUniversity of Southern Queensland\n\nWestern Australia\n\nCurtin University of Technology\n\nEdith Cowan University\n\nMurdoch University\n\nThe University of Notre Dame Australia\n\nThe University of Western Australia\n\nSouth Australia\n\nThe Flinders University of South Australia\n\nThe University of Adelaide\n\nUniversity of South Australia\n\nTasmania\n\nAustralian Maritime College\n\nUniversity of Tasmania\n\nNorthern Territory\n\nCharles Darwin University\n\nBatchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education\n\nAustralian Capital Territory\n\nThe Australian National University\n\nUniversity of Canberra\n\nMulti-State\n\nAustralian Catholic University\n\n \n\nB: Other eligible institutions\n\n \n\nMuseums and herbaria which are Australian publicly funded organisations not directly funded to carry out research but with research-related purposes and objectives.\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\nAppendix 3.  Notional ARC Fellowship Salaries for Funding Commencing in 2006 (2006$)\n\n \n\nSalaries are indexed annually.\n\n \n\n| Fellowship | Step/Option | Salary | 26% on-costs | TOTAL |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Australian Postdoctoral Fellowship (APD);   Australian Postdoctoral Fellowship Industry (APDI);  Linkage Australian Postdoctoral Fellowship CSIRO;   Research Cadetship-Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (RC-ATSI) | 3 year, 100% option<br> <br>4 year, 75/25% option | $59,000<br> <br>$44,250 | $15,340<br> <br>$11,505 | $74,340<br> <br>$55,755<br> <br> <br> |\n| Australian Research Fellowship (ARF) | 100% option<br>                50% option | $74,000<br>$37,000 | $19,240<br>$9,620 | $93,240<br>$46,620<br> |\n| Queen Elizabeth II Fellowship<br>(QEII)<br> | 100% option<br>                50% option | $88,000<br>$44,000 | $22,880<br>$11,440 | $110,880<br>$55,440 |\n| Australian Professorial Fellowship<br>(APF)<br> | Step 1 – 100% option<br>                50% option | $102,000<br>$51,000 | $26,520<br>$13,260 | $128,520<br>$64,260 |\n| Australian Professorial Fellowship<br>(APF)<br> | Step 2 – 100% option<br>                50% option | $118,000<br> $59,000 | $30,680<br>$15,340 | $148,680<br>$74,340 |\n| Federation Fellowship |  | $241,224 | $62,718 | $303,942 |\n\n\n \n\nARC Fellows Relocation (maximum) Allowances\n\n \n\nUSA              $17,000\n\nUK/Europe/Asia (Nth Hem)              $14,000\n\nAsia (Sth Hem)/NZ              $ 11,000\n\nAustralia              $ 8,000\n\n \n","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"kimi_summary":{"_metrics":{"model":"kimi-k2.5","source":"moonshot-realtime","completionTokens":2635},"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":6,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"These rules implement the 2006 funding round for the Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development scheme established under the ARC Act 2001. The scope remains consistent with the original purpose of supporting Indigenous Australian researchers to develop competitive research expertise. Section 2 notes only minor administrative updates from the 2005 version (clarifications on ARC/NHMRC overlap, project title discretion, updated salary rates, and reordered sections), with no expansion of the scheme's fundamental purpose or beneficiary class."},"complexity_factors":["Approximately 40 defined acronyms and terms in the interpretation section","Dual application tracks (Chief Investigator vs Research Cadetship) with distinct, detailed eligibility criteria","Multiple cross-scheme restrictions and anti-duplication rules involving the NHMRC and other ARC programs","Specific numerical thresholds for eligibility (e.g., PhD awarded after 1 March 2002, salary derivation percentages, grant limits)","Exception provisions for career interruptions requiring formal exemption requests","Detailed budget exclusions (7 categories of non-supported items) and organisational certification requirements"],"plain_english_summary":"The 2006 Funding Rules for the ARC’s Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development scheme set out grants and cadetships to build research capacity among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander scholars, funding project costs and postdoctoral salary support to help them compete for mainstream grants. It matters because it supports career development, Indigenous-led research, and pathways into broader competitive funding while imposing procedural safeguards and eligibility requirements."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":5,"scope_assessment":{"changed":true,"description":"The 2006 rules introduce a new ARC–NHMRC overlap process (Clause 6.2), clarify ARC discretion to alter project titles/descriptions (Section 11.3), add notional fellowship salary and relocation rates (Appendix 3), and contain wording/ordering updates intended to align NCGP schemes (Section 2). These are incremental scope changes to administration and eligibility rather than wholesale program redesign."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple investigator roles with distinct eligibility tests (CI, RC-ATSI, Mentor, Supervisor) and Indigenous identification rules (Sections 5.1–5.5)","Detailed limits on number and type of grants per researcher and constraints on duplicate/similar applications (Section 3.6)","Cross-agency overlap and duplication controls, including ARC–NHMRC referral process and deadlines (Sections 6.1–6.2; Key Dates)","Specific budget inclusions/exclusions and conditions for teaching relief and salaries (Sections 3.1, 3.5)","Prescriptive application format, submission system (GAMS), certification and copy requirements creating administrative compliance costs (Sections 7.4, 7.4.1–7.4.4)","Multistage assessment process with external assessors, applicant rejoinder, and ARC/Board/Minister decision pathway (Sections 8.2, 8.2.2–8.2.4)","Broad discretionary exclusion and variation powers for the ARC (exclusion, title changes, funding variation) increasing implementation risk (Sections 8.2.1, 10.1.2, 11.3)","Reporting, funding agreement terms, IP obligations and confidentiality/publicity rules imposing post-award obligations on administering organisations (Sections 10.1–10.1.3, 11.2–11.4)","Enforcement provisions including exclusion for misleading information and referral for prosecution under Commonwealth law (Section 11.5)","Appendices and indexed salary/relocation tables that affect budget planning and costing (Appendix 3)"],"plain_english_summary":"**Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development — Funding Rules (2006)**\n\nThese rules set out how the ARC will operate the Discovery Indigenous Researchers Development scheme: who may apply (Indigenous Australian researchers), what funding is available (grants and RC-ATSI cadetships paid to eligible organisations), and the steps for application, assessment, award, reporting and variations. They also list excluded activities, budget items, and sanctions for misleading information.\n\nThe document matters because it defines who receives public research funds, the compliance burdens on applicants and institutions, and the ARC's decision and variation powers."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/f2008b00419","history":"/api/acts/f2008b00419/history","analysis":"/api/acts/f2008b00419/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/f2008b00419/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/f2008b00419/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/f2008b00419/documents"}}