{"id":"F1999B00030","name":"Extradition (Republic of Estonia) Regulations 1999","slug":"extradition-republic-of-estonia-regulations-1999","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"32 of 1999","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":30407,"registerId":"commonwealth-F1999B00030-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-01","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Extradition (Republic of Estonia) Regulations 1999","content":"![Commonwealth Coat of Arms](image.001.png)\n\nExtradition (Republic of Estonia) Regulations 1999\n\nStatutory Rules 1999 No. 32 as amended\n\nmade under the\n\nExtradition Act 1988\n\nThis compilation was prepared on 20 September 2012  \ntaking into account amendments up to SLI 2012 No. 210\n\nPrepared by the Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing,  \nAttorney-General’s Department, Canberra\n\nContents\n\n1 Name of regulations \\[see Note 1\\]\n\n2 Commencement \\[see Note 1\\]\n\n3 Definitions\n\n4 Declaration that Estonia is an extradition country\n\nNotes\n\n1 Name of regulations \\[see Note 1\\]\n\nThese regulations are the Extradition (Republic of Estonia) Regulations 1999.\n\n2 Commencement \\[see Note 1\\]\n\nThese regulations commence on gazettal.\n\n3 Definitions\n\nIn these regulations:\n\n> Act means the Extradition Act 1988.\n\n> Estonia means the Republic of Estonia.\n\n4 Declaration that Estonia is an extradition country\n\nEstonia is declared to be an extradition country.\n\n> Notes to the Extradition (Republic of Estonia) Regulations 1999\n\n> Note 1\n\n> Note: The Extradition (Republic of Estonia) Regulations 1999 (in force under the Extradition Act 1988) as shown in this compilation comprise Statutory Rules 1999 No. 32 amended as indicated in the Tables below.\n\n> Note: > Note: Table of Instruments\n\n| Year andNumber | Date of notificationin Gazette or FRLI registration | Date ofcommencement                  | Application, saving ortransitional provisions |\n| -------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------- |\n| 1999 No. 32    | 2 Mar 1999                                          | 2 Mar 1999                           |                                               |\n| 2012 No. 210   | 3 Sept 2012 (see F2012L01825)                       | Schedule 12: 20 Sept 2012 (see s. 2) | —                                             |\n\n> Note: > Note: Table of Amendments\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:371.1pt; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"2\" style=\"width:360.3pt; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableOfAmendHead\" style=\"margin-right:0pt\"><span>ad. = added or inserted</span><span> </span><span>am. = amended</span><span> </span><span>rep. = repealed</span><span> </span><span>rs. = repealed and substituted</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:110.95pt; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableColHead\"><span>Provision affected</span></p></td><td style=\"width:238.55pt; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableColHead\"><span>How affected</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:110.95pt; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableOfAmend\" style=\"margin-right:0pt; margin-bottom:3pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid\"><span>R. 5</span><span style=\"width:92.84pt; text-indent:0pt; font-family:'Lucida Console', monospace; display:inline-block\">.................</span></p></td><td style=\"width:238.55pt; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableOfAmend\" style=\"margin-right:0pt; margin-bottom:3pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid\"><span>rep. 2012 No. 210</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":1,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The regulations remain tightly scoped to their original purpose. The 2012 amendment removed Rule 5 (evidence requirements), narrowing rather than expanding the scope. The instrument's sole function has always been to declare Estonia an extradition country under the Extradition Act 1988."},"complexity_factors":["Extremely short: only 4 operative provisions","Only 2 defined terms ('Act' and 'Estonia')","No cross-references to other legislation beyond the parent Act","No conditional logic, exceptions, or procedural rules","Single substantive effect: a declaration that triggers the parent Act","2012 amendment actually reduced complexity by repealing Rule 5"],"plain_english_summary":"These regulations are a short, technical piece of law that allows Australia to extradite (hand over) people to Estonia, and vice versa. \n\n**What it does:**\n- **Declares Estonia an \"extradition country\"** — this means Australia recognises Estonia as having a formal agreement to send suspected or convicted criminals between the two countries.\n- **Enables the Extradition Act 1988** to apply to Estonia — the Act sets out the rules for how extradition works (what crimes qualify, what evidence is needed, human rights protections, etc.).\n\n**Who it affects:**\n- People in Australia who are wanted by Estonian authorities for criminal offences.\n- People in Estonia who are wanted by Australian authorities.\n- Courts, police, and government lawyers handling extradition requests.\n\n**Why it matters:**\nWithout this declaration, Australia couldn't legally extradite someone to Estonia even if both countries wanted to cooperate. This regulation \"switches on\" the extradition relationship, making it possible to transfer accused or convicted people across borders for prosecution or to serve sentences.\n\n**Note on the 2012 amendment:** The original regulations included a specific rule (Rule 5) about documentary evidence requirements, but this was removed in 2012. This suggests the general rules in the Extradition Act 1988 were deemed sufficient, simplifying the process."},"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"Unauthenticated. Configure AI_GATEWAY_API_KEY or use a provider module. Learn more: https://ai-sdk.dev/unauthenticated-ai-gateway","source":"analysis-cron"},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":2,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The regulation's core purpose—declaring the Republic of Estonia an extradition country under the Extradition Act—remains narrow and unchanged. The 2012 amendment noted in the compilation (repeal of a Rule 5) appears to be a minor technical change and does not broaden the instrument's substantive scope or create new types of obligations; therefore the instrument has not grown beyond its original, limited purpose of making the statutory declaration necessary to trigger the Extradition Act's mechanisms in relation to Estonia (see regulation 4)."},"complexity_factors":["Very short instrument (4 regulations only)","Only one substantive operative provision (regulation 4 declares Estonia an extradition country)","Two defined terms in regulation 3 (Act; Estonia)","Single cross-reference to a major external statute (Extradition Act 1988) which contains the substantive legal framework","Commencement is simple (on gazettal)","Amendment history shows a minor repeal (Rule 5) but no added conditional logic or nested exceptions in the current text"],"plain_english_summary":"These regulations declare the Republic of Estonia an \"extradition country\" under the Extradition Act 1988, effective on Gazette publication, so Australia may use the Act’s procedures to request or grant surrender of people between the two states.\n\nIt mainly affects Australian and Estonian law‑enforcement/prosecutors and individuals facing extradition; the instrument is recognition-only—procedural rules, costs and discretion come from the Extradition Act and its implementation."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/extradition-republic-of-estonia-regulations-1999","history":"/api/acts/extradition-republic-of-estonia-regulations-1999/history","analysis":"/api/acts/extradition-republic-of-estonia-regulations-1999/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/extradition-republic-of-estonia-regulations-1999/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/extradition-republic-of-estonia-regulations-1999/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/extradition-republic-of-estonia-regulations-1999/documents"}}