{"id":"F2010L01769","name":"Extradition (Nauru) Regulations 2010","slug":"extradition-nauru-regulations-2010","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":"157 of 2010","makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":153162,"registerId":"commonwealth-F2010L01769-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-04","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Extradition (Nauru) Regulations 2010","content":"![Commonwealth Coat of Arms](image.001.png)\n\nExtradition (Nauru) Regulations 2010\n\nSelect Legislative Instrument 2010 No. 157 as amended\n\nmade under the\n\nExtradition Act 1988\n\nThis compilation was prepared on 20 September 2012  \ntaking into account amendments up to SLI 2012 No. 210\n\nPrepared by the Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing,  \nAttorney‑General’s Department, Canberra\n\nContents\n\n1 Name of Regulations \\[see Note 1\\]\n\n2 Commencement \\[see Note 1\\]\n\n3 Definition\n\n4 Extradition country\n\n6 Modification of Act — application to Nauru\n\nNotes\n\n1 Name of Regulations \\[see Note 1\\]\n\nThese Regulations are the Extradition (Nauru) Regulations 2010.\n\n2 Commencement \\[see Note 1\\]\n\nThese Regulations commence on the day after they are registered.\n\n3 Definition\n\nIn these Regulations:\n\n> Act means the Extradition Act 1988.\n\n4 Extradition country\n\nFor the definition of extradition country in section 5 of the Act, Nauru is declared to be an extradition country.\n\n6 Modification of Act — application to Nauru\n\nFor section 11 of the Act, the Act applies in relation to Nauru as if a reference to 45 days in paragraph 17 (2) (a) of the Act were a reference to 60 days.\n\n> Notes to the Extradition (Nauru) Regulations 2010\n\n> Note 1\n\n> Note: The Extradition (Nauru) Regulations 2010 (in force under the Extradition Act 1988) as shown in this compilation comprise Select Legislative Instrument 2010 No. 157 amended as indicated in the Tables below.\n\n> Note: > Note: Table of Instruments\n\n| Year andNumber | Date of FRLI registration     | Date ofcommencement                  | Application, saving ortransitional provisions |\n| -------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------- |\n| 2010 No. 157   | 1 July 2010 (see F2010L01769) | 2 July 2010                          |                                               |\n| 2012 No. 210   | 3 Sept 2012 (see F2012L01825) | Schedule 10: 20 Sept 2012 (see s. 2) | —                                             |\n\n> Note: > Note: Table of Amendments\n\n```html\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"width:371.1pt; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse\"><thead><tr><td colspan=\"2\" style=\"width:360.3pt; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableOfAmendHead\" style=\"margin-right:0pt\"><span>ad. = added or inserted</span><span> </span><span>am. = amended</span><span> </span><span>rep. = repealed</span><span> </span><span>rs. = repealed and substituted</span></p></td></tr><tr><td style=\"width:118.1pt; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableColHead\"><span>Provision affected</span></p></td><td style=\"width:231.4pt; border-top:0.75pt solid #000000; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableColHead\"><span>How affected</span></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td style=\"width:118.1pt; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableOfAmend\" style=\"margin-right:0pt; margin-bottom:3pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid\"><span>R. 5</span><span style=\"width:101.59pt; text-indent:0pt; font-family:'Lucida Console', monospace; display:inline-block\">..................</span></p></td><td style=\"width:231.4pt; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top\"><p class=\"TableOfAmend\" style=\"margin-right:0pt; margin-bottom:3pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid\"><span>rep. 2012 No. 210</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\n```","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":2,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The regulations remain tightly focused on their original purpose: enabling extradition between Australia and Nauru with a single procedural modification. The repeal of regulation 5 (which occurred in 2012) actually reduced the scope slightly rather than expanding it."},"complexity_factors":["Only 4 substantive provisions (regulations 1-4, 6), with regulation 5 repealed","Single defined term ('Act')","One modification to the parent Act (changing 45 days to 60 days in one paragraph)","No nested conditions, exceptions, or cross-references beyond the basic reference to the Extradition Act 1988","Total length is approximately 1 page of substantive content"],"plain_english_summary":"These regulations designate Nauru as an extradition country under Australian law, creating the legal framework for police, courts and authorities to request or carry out extraditions between Australia and Nauru. \n\nThey also extend Nauru’s deadline to supply supporting documents for an extradition request from 45 to 60 days, affecting people sought for extradition and the officials who process those requests."},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":3,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The Regulations do not broaden the Extradition Act’s substantive reach; they declare Nauru an extradition country (Reg 4) and alter one procedural deadline to 60 days for Nauru cases (Reg 6). The Table of Amendments notes a repeal of regulation 5 by 2012 No. 210, but the operative scope remains the listing of Nauru and the single timing modification."},"complexity_factors":["Very short instrument with only two operative declarations — low textual complexity (Regs 4 and 6).","Relies on cross‑references to the Extradition Act 1988 (definition of 'extradition country' and paragraph 17(2)(a)), requiring users to consult the parent Act to understand full effect.","Modifies a single procedural timeframe (45 → 60 days) for Nauru (Reg 6), so precise legal effect depends on locating the referenced provision in the Act.","Administrative implications are limited but concrete: officials must apply a different deadline for Nauru cases, affecting processing timetables and resource planning.","Amendment and commencement history in the Notes and Tables requires tracking to know the current text (see Notes/Table of Instruments and Table of Amendments)."],"plain_english_summary":"These Regulations add Nauru to the list of countries covered by the Extradition Act 1988 and change a timing rule so a 60‑day period (not 45 days) applies in relation to Nauru. They affect people subject to extradition between Australia and Nauru and the officials who process those requests by lengthening a statutory processing/decision timeframe, while leaving the Act’s substantive extradition rules in place."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/extradition-nauru-regulations-2010","history":"/api/acts/extradition-nauru-regulations-2010/history","analysis":"/api/acts/extradition-nauru-regulations-2010/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/extradition-nauru-regulations-2010/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/extradition-nauru-regulations-2010/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/extradition-nauru-regulations-2010/documents"}}