{"id":"F2005B01738","name":"Exemption Number 01/1993 - Exemption","slug":"exemption-number-01-1993-exemption","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":112169,"registerId":"commonwealth-F2005B01738-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-03","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Exemption Number 01/1993 - Exemption","content":"EXEMPTION NUMBER: 01/1993\n\nCIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS\n\nEXEMPTION\n\nI, RONALD STANLEY COOPER, General Manager, Safety Regulation and Standards Division, Civil Aviation Authority, a delegate of the Civil Aviation Authority, under regulation 308 of the Civil Aviation Regulations, exempt the following aircraft:\n\n(a) Moyes “BMX Tug” aeroplane registered with the Australian Ultralight Federation Limited as number 10-1253;\n\n(b) Moyes “Dragonfly” aeroplane registered with the Australian Ultralight Federation Limited as number 10-1328;\n\nfrom compliance with the following provisions of the Civil Aviation Regulations:\n\n(c) Parts III and IV;\n\n(d) Part 5;\n\n(e) regulations 92, 133, 134, 139, 155 and 157;\n\n(f) regulation 150 (but only in relation to the dropping of tow lines used in towing hang gliders);\n\n(g) regulation 163 (but only in relation to operations in proximity to aircraft to which section 95.8, 95.10, 95.32 or 95.55 of the Civil Aviation Orders applies);\n\n(h) Division 4 of Part XII;\n\n(i) regulations 207 and 228, subregulations 230 (2) and 242 (2) and regulation 258;\n\nsubject to the aircraft being operated in compliance with:\n\n(j) the conditions set out in the Schedule; and\n\n(k) the conditions set out in subsection 3A, subparagraphs 4.1 (a), (b), (d), (e), (f) and (g) and subsections 5, 6 and 7 of section 95.10 of the Civil Aviation Orders.\n\nA word or phrase used in this instrument that is defined for the purposes of section 95.10 of the Civil Aviation Orders has the same meaning in this instrument as it does in the Order.\n\nSCHEDULE\n\nThe aeroplane must not be used for any purpose except:\n\n(a) the personal carriage of the pilot; or\n\n(b) the aerial inspection of stock, fencing, or farm or pastoral equipment that is located on land owned by, or under the control of, the pilot or a member of the pilot’s immediate family; or\n\n(c) the towing of hang gliders.\n\n\\[Signed Ron Cooper\\]\n\nRONALD STANLEY COOPER\n\nDelegate of the Civil Aviation Authority\n\n18 February 1993","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":3,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The instrument itself creates a narrow, self-contained exemption for two named aircraft; it does not amend or expand the underlying Civil Aviation Regulations. Based solely on this text, it confines regulatory relief to specified aircraft and activities and does not purport to alter the broader statutory scope."},"complexity_factors":["Very narrow application: exemption applies to two specifically identified aircraft (registrations 10-1253 and 10-1328).","Multiple cross-references: lists whole Parts and several numbered regulations, increasing interpretive work to see what is excluded.","Partial exemptions: some provisions are exempted only in limited respects (e.g. regulation 150 only for dropping tow lines), adding conditional nuance.","Dependency on external instrument: uses definitions and operational conditions taken from section 95.10 of the Civil Aviation Orders, requiring cross-checking.","Operational limits in Schedule tightly constrain permitted uses, so compliance requires verifying ownership/control of land and activity purpose.","Delegated decision-making: exemption issued by a named delegate (General Manager, Safety Regulation and Standards Division), implying administrative discretion in grant.","Enforcement and compliance burden sits with pilots/registrants to ensure operations remain within the narrowly defined exemptions and referenced Order provisions.","Potential definitional ambiguity (terms defined only in the Civil Aviation Orders), which raises modest legal clarity costs for affected operators."],"plain_english_summary":"This instrument grants two specifically named Moyes ultralight aeroplanes a limited exemption from various provisions of the Civil Aviation Regulations, subject to conditions and defined terms in the Civil Aviation Orders. It affects the aircraft owners/pilots by allowing only three permitted uses (personal carriage, on‑property agricultural inspection, and towing hang gliders) and requires them to operate under the Civil Aviation Authority’s delegated conditions."},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":3,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"This is a narrow, specific exemption instrument affecting exactly two identified aircraft. It does not represent scope creep from an original broader purpose; rather, it is precisely targeted at allowing limited operations for specific recreational aircraft under strict conditions. The scope is intentionally restricted and has not expanded beyond this original purpose."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple cross-references to external documents (Civil Aviation Regulations Parts III, IV, 5, XII; specific regulations numbered 92, 133, 134, etc.; Civil Aviation Orders section 95.10 with subsections and subparagraphs)","Conditional exemptions (regulations 150 and 163 are only partially exempted with specific limitations)","Incorporation of external conditions by reference (Schedule conditions and Civil Aviation Orders section 95.10)","Defined terms imported from external instrument (section 95.10 of Civil Aviation Orders)","Specific aircraft identification requiring verification against external registers (Australian Ultralight Federation registration numbers 10-1253 and 10-1328)"],"plain_english_summary":"This 1993 Civil Aviation Authority exemption lets two specific Moyes light aircraft be registered with the Australian Ultralight Federation and avoid many standard Civil Aviation Regulations, subject to strict conditions. Use is limited to solo flights, inspecting the owner’s/relatives’ land and stock/equipment, and towing hang gliders, with detailed safety limits. It affects the aircraft owners, AUF, and hang-glider tow operators, illustrating tailored rules for low‑risk recreational operations."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/exemption-number-01-1993-exemption","history":"/api/acts/exemption-number-01-1993-exemption/history","analysis":"/api/acts/exemption-number-01-1993-exemption/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/exemption-number-01-1993-exemption/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/exemption-number-01-1993-exemption/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/exemption-number-01-1993-exemption/documents"}}