{"id":"F2017L01178","name":"Do Not Call Register (Administration and Operation) Determination 2017","slug":"do-not-call-register-administration-and-operation-determination-2017","collection":"legislative_instrument","jurisdiction":"commonwealth","status":"in_force","isInForce":true,"actNumber":null,"makingDate":null,"administeringDepartment":null,"currentVersion":{"id":97059,"registerId":"commonwealth-F2017L01178-current","compilationNumber":null,"startDate":"2026-04-02","status":"InForce","reasons":null,"registeredAt":null},"sections":[{"sectionNumber":"1","sectionType":"section","heading":"Do Not Call Register (Administration and Operation) Determination 2017","content":"![](image.001.png)\n\nDo Not Call Register (Administration and Operation) Determination 2017\n\n\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\n\nThe Australian Communications and Media Authority makes the following Determination under subsection 18(1) of the Do Not Call Register Act 2006.\n\nDated: 8 September 2017\n\nRichard Bean\n\n\\[signed\\]  \nMember\n\nJames Cameron\n\n\\[signed\\]  \nMember/General Manager\n\nAustralian Communications and Media Authority\n\nPart 1 - Preliminary\n\n1 Name of Determination\n\nThis is the Do Not Call Register (Administration and Operation) Determination 2017.\n\n2 Commencement\n\nThis Determination commences at the start of the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislation.\n\nNote: The Federal Register of Legislation may be accessed at www.legislation.gov.au.\n\n3 Authority\n\nThis Determination is made under subsection 18(1) of the Do Not Call Register Act 2006.\n\n4 Repeal of the Do Not Call Register (Administration and Operation) Determination 2007\n\nThe Do Not Call Register (Administration and Operation) Determination 2007 (F2007L01220) is repealed.\n\n5 Definitions\n\nIn this Determination:\n\n> Act means the Do Not Call Register Act 2006.\n\n> bulk application means an application in respect of 21 or more Australian numbers submitted at the same time by the same applicant.\n\n> fax number means an Australian number which is used or maintained exclusively for transmitting and/or receiving faxes.\n\nNote: A number of other expressions used in this Determination have the meanings given by section 4 of the Act, including the following:\n\n    (a) ACMA\n    (b) Australian number\n    (c) contracted service provider\n    (d) Do Not Call Register\n    (e) emergency service number\n    (f) fax\n    (g) government body\n    (h) nominee\n    (i) relevant account-holder.\n\n6 References to other instruments or writing\n\nIn this Determination, unless the contrary intention appears:\n\n  (a) a reference to any other legislative instrument is a reference to that other legislative instrument as in force from time to time; and\n  (b) a reference to any other kind of instrument or writing is a reference to that instrument or writing as in force from time to time.\n\nNote 1: For references to Commonwealth Acts, see section 10 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901; and see also subsection 13(1) of the Legislation Act 2003 for the application of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to legislative instruments.\n\nNote 2: All Commonwealth Acts and legislative instruments are registered on the Federal Register of Legislation.\n\n  \n\nPart 2 – Administration and operation of the Do Not Call Register\n\n7 Applications for registration and applications to check entries on the Do Not Call Register\n\n  (1) A relevant account-holder, or a nominee of a relevant account-holder, may apply in accordance with the Act to register an Australian number on the Do Not Call Register, and may apply to access the Do Not Call Register to check whether a number of the relevant account-holder has been registered.\n  (2) Subject to subsections (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7), an application by a relevant account-holder or a nominee of a relevant account-holder to register an Australian number on the Do Not Call Register, or an application by a relevant account-holder or a nominee of a relevant account-holder to check an entry on the Do Not Call Register, may be made using the following application methods:\n  (a) by telephone; or\n  (b) via the internet; or\n  (c) by post; or\n  (d) by fax; or\n  (e) by e-mail; or\n  (f) in any other way approved by the ACMA and specified:\n    (i) on the ACMA’s website; or\n    (ii) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  Note: The website of the ACMA is [www.acma.gov.au](http://www.acma.gov.au). The website of the contracted service provider is [www.donotcall.gov.au](http://www.donotcall.gov.au).\n  (3) A relevant account-holder may only apply to register a fax number by telephone, or to check an entry relating to a fax number by telephone if the ACMA so approves that method in respect of such applications and that approval is specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (4) A bulk application by a relevant account-holder to register Australian numbers, or to check entries on the Do Not Call Register, may only be made by telephone, post, fax or e-mail if the ACMA so approves that method in respect of such applications and that approval is specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (5) Unless the nominee is making a bulk application, a nominee of a relevant account-holder may only apply to register an Australian number, or to check an entry on the Do Not Call Register, by telephone or via the internet, if the ACMA so approves that method in respect of such applications and that approval is specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (6) If a nominee is making a bulk application to register Australian numbers on the Do Not Call Register, or to check entries on the Do Not Call Register, the nominee may only do so by telephone, post, fax or e-mail if the ACMA so approves that method in respect of such applications and that approval is specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (7) An application by a relevant account-holder, or nominee of a relevant account-holder, to register an Australian number on the Do Not Call Register, or to check an entry on the Do Not Call Register, using any of the application methods set out in this section, must be made in accordance with any written procedure approved by the ACMA and include any information reasonably required by the ACMA as specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (8) Following an application to register an Australian number made in accordance with this Determination, the ACMA or the contracted service provider must enter the Australian number(s) sought to be registered, including the area code, if any, on the Do Not Call Register.\n  Note 1: The ACMA or the contracted service provider is not required to obtain confirmation of intention to register an Australian number, before registering that Australian number on the Do Not Call Register.\n  Note 2: The ACMA and the contracted service provider (if any) are both bound by the Privacy Act 1988.\n  Note 3: No fee is payable for registration.\n  Note 4: Giving false or misleading information may be an offence under section 137.1 of the Criminal Code.\n  (9) Following an application made in accordance with this Determination to check an entry on the Do Not Call Register, the ACMA or the contracted service provider must advise the applicant as soon as practicable, whether the number(s) sought to be checked is registered on the Do Not Call Register.\n  Note 1: The ACMA and the contracted service provider (if any) are both bound by the Privacy Act 1988.\n  Note 2: No fee is payable for accessing the Do Not Call Register to check whether a number has been registered.\n  Note 3: Giving false or misleading information may be an offence under section 137.1 of the Criminal Code.\n\n8 Applications for correction of entries made on the Do Not Call Register\n\n  (1) A relevant account‑holder, or nominee of a relevant account-holder, may apply to correct an entry relating to a number of the relevant account‑holder on the Do Not Call Register.\n  (2) Subject to subsections (3), (4) and (5), an application by a relevant account-holder, or nominee of a relevant account-holder, to correct an entry on the Do Not Call Register may be made using the following application methods:\n  (a) by telephone; or\n  (b) via the internet; or\n  (c) by post; or\n  (d) by fax; or\n  (e) by e-mail; or\n  (f) in any other way approved by the ACMA and specified:\n    (i) on the ACMA’s website; or\n    (ii) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (3) Unless the application is a bulk application, a relevant account-holder, or nominee of a relevant account-holder, may only apply to correct an entry by telephone or via the internet if the ACMA so approves such a method in respect of such applications and that approval is specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (4) If the application is a bulk application, a relevant account-holder, or nominee of a relevant account-holder, may only apply to correct entries by telephone, post, fax or e-mail if the ACMA so approves such a method in respect of such applications and that approval is specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (5) An application by a relevant-account holder, or nominee of a relevant account-holder, to correct an entry on the Do Not Call Register, using any of the application methods set out in this section, must be made in accordance with any written procedure approved by the ACMA and include any information reasonably required by the ACMA as specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  Note 1: The ACMA or the contracted service provider is not required to obtain confirmation of intention to correct an entry, before correcting that entry on the Do Not Call Register.\n  Note 2: The ACMA and the contracted service provider (if any) are both bound by the Privacy Act 1988.\n  Note 3: No fee is payable for correction of the Do Not Call Register.\n  Note 4: Giving false or misleading information may be an offence under section 137.1 of the Criminal Code.\n\n9 Correction of the Do Not Call Register\n\n  (1) The ACMA or the contracted service provider may check the correctness of an entry on the Do Not Call Register at any time, and must do so if it receives an application under section 8 in relation to that entry.\n  (2) If the ACMA or the contracted service provider determines that an entry on the Do Not Call Register is incorrect, the ACMA or the contracted service provider must:\n  (a) before any correction is made, make reasonable efforts to inform the person identified by the ACMA or the contracted service provider as the relevant account‑holder for the number associated with the entry that the entry is to be corrected; and\n  (b) correct the entry.\n\n10 Applications for removal of entries from the Do Not Call Register\n\n  (1) A relevant account-holder, or nominee of a relevant account-holder, may apply to remove an entry for a number of the relevant account holder from the Do Not Call Register.\n  (2) Subject to subsections (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7), an application by a relevant account-holder, or nominee of a relevant account-holder, to remove an entry on the Do Not Call Register may be made using the following application methods:\n  (a) by telephone; or\n  (b) via the internet; or\n  (c) by post; or\n  (d) by fax; or\n  (e) by e-mail; or\n  (f) in any other way approved by the ACMA and specified:\n    (i) on the ACMA’s website; or\n    (ii) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (3) Where an application is not a bulk application, and does not relate to a fax number, a relevant account-holder may only apply to remove an entry via the internet if the ACMA so approves such a method in respect of such applications and that approval is specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (4) Where an application is not a bulk application, and relates to a fax number, a relevant account-holder may only apply to remove an entry by telephone or via the internet if the ACMA so approves such a method in respect of such applications and that approval is specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (5) Where an application is not a bulk application, a nominee of a relevant account-holder may only apply to remove an entry by telephone or via the internet if the ACMA so approves such a method in respect of such applications and that approval is specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (6) If a relevant account-holder or nominee of a relevant account-holder is making a bulk application to remove entries from the Do Not Call Register, the relevant account-holder or nominee may only do so by telephone, post, fax or e-mail if the ACMA so approves such a method in respect of such applications and that approval is specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (7) An application by a relevant-account holder or nominee of a relevant account-holder to remove an entry from the Do Not Call Register, using any of the application methods set out in this section, must be made in accordance with any written procedure approved by the ACMA and include any information reasonably required by the ACMA as specified:\n  (a) on the ACMA’s website; or\n  (b) if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider – on the website of the contracted service provider.\n  (8) Following an application made in accordance with this section, the ACMA or the contracted service provider must remove the entry from the Do Not Call Register.\n  Note 1: The ACMA or the contracted service provider is not required to obtain confirmation of intention to remove a number, before removing that number from the Do Not Call Register.\n  Note 2: The ACMA and the contracted service provider (if any) are both bound by the Privacy Act 1988.\n\nNote 3: No fee is payable for removal of a number from the Do Not Call Register.\n\nNote 4: Giving false or misleading information may be an offence under section 137.1 of the Criminal Code.\n\n11 Removal of ineligible numbers from the Do Not Call Register\n\n  (1) The ACMA must remove, or require the contracted service provider to remove, an entry from the Do Not Call Register if the ACMA is satisfied that:\n  (a) the number associated with that entry is not eligible to be entered on the Do Not Call Register; or\n  (b) the person who applied to register the number associated with that entry was not eligible, under section 15 of the Act, to register the number on the Do Not Call Register.\n  (2) Before removing an entry from the Do Not Call Register under subsection (1), the ACMA or the contracted service provider must make reasonable efforts to inform the person identified by the ACMA or the contracted service provider as the relevant account‑holder for the number associated with the entry that the entry is to be removed from the Do Not Call Register.\n\n12 Handling of complaints when the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider\n\n  (1) This section applies if the Do Not Call Register is kept by a contracted service provider.\n  (2) The contracted service provider must deal with complaints and enquiries about the administration and operation of the Do Not Call Register.\n  (3) The contracted service provider must refer to the ACMA any complaints about a breach of:\n  (a) the Act; or\n  (b) any regulations made under the Act; or\n  (c) any code made, or standard registered, under the Telecommunications Act 1997 that relates to the Do Not Call Register.","sortOrder":0}],"analysis":{"flash_summary_failed":{"failed":true,"reason":"A positive credit balance is required for all requests, including BYOK, so fallback providers remain available. Add credits at https://vercel.com/d?to=%2F%5Bteam%5D%2F%7E%2Fai%3Fmodal%3Dtop-up to continue.","source":"analysis-cron"},"flash_summary":{"complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"This Determination is an administrative instrument that replaces the 2007 Determination (s.4). It specifies operational procedures and application methods under the Do Not Call Register Act 2006 rather than expanding the Act's substantive reach. The changes are procedural: defining how registrations, checks, corrections and removals are made and handled, and allocating operational duties to ACMA or a contracted service provider (ss.7–12). It does not broaden who may register numbers or introduce new substantive prohibitions or obligations beyond the Act; therefore the scope of the legislation relative to the Act's original purpose is not significantly changed."},"complexity_factors":["Relatively short instrument (single Determination) but with multiple conditional provisions across Parts 2 (ss.7–12).","3 defined terms in the Determination (Act, bulk application, fax number) plus 9 externally referenced defined terms drawn from the Act (see s.5 note).","Repeated, slightly different condition sets for the same processes (register/check/correct/remove) across ss.7, 8, 10 — increases cognitive load by repetition with small variations.","Multiple cross‑references to external instruments and statutes (Do Not Call Register Act 2006, Privacy Act 1988, Criminal Code, Telecommunications Act 1997 and any codes) requiring users to consult other laws.","Frequent dependency on ACMA discretion/approval and on publication on the ACMA or contractor website (scattered ACMA‑approval hooks in s.7(2)–(7), s.8(2)–(5), s.10(2)–(7)).","Distinctions based on applicant type (relevant account‑holder vs nominee), application scale (bulk vs non‑bulk), and service type (fax vs other) create branching logic (multiple nested exceptions).","Operational detail left to separate written procedures approved by ACMA (procedures not in this document) — users must consult external published procedures to act."],"plain_english_summary":"**What this Determination does (mechanically)\n\n- Sets how the Do Not Call Register is to be administered and operated by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) or by a contracted service provider. (See s.3, s.7–s.12.)\n\n- Prescribes who may apply to register, check, correct or remove a number on the Register (\"relevant account‑holder\" or their \"nominee\") and the methods by which those applications may be made (telephone, internet, post, fax, e‑mail, or any other ACMA‑approved method published on the ACMA or contracted provider website). (See s.7(1)–(2), s.8(1)–(2), s.10(1)–(2).)\n\n- Draws detailed distinctions on permitted application methods depending on circumstances: whether the application is a bulk application (21+ numbers), whether the application concerns a fax number, and whether the applicant is a nominee. Many methods require specific ACMA approval and publication before they may be used. (See s.5 definition of \"bulk application\" and s.7(3)–(7), s.8(3)–(6), s.10(3)–(7).)\n\n- Requires the ACMA or contracted service provider to enter numbers onto the Register after a valid application, and to advise applicants whether a number is registered when asked. (See s.7(8)–(9).)\n\n- Permits correction and requires the ACMA/contracted provider to check entries on the Register on request; if an entry is wrong the ACMA/contracted provider must inform the relevant account‑holder (reasonable efforts) and correct it. (See s.8, s.9.)\n\n- Requires removal of entries found ineligible (on ACMA satisfaction) and obliges the ACMA/contracted provider to make reasonable efforts to inform the affected relevant account‑holder before removal. (See s.11.)\n\n- If the Do Not Call Register is held by a contracted service provider, that provider deals with administration complaints and must refer complaints alleging breaches of the Act, related regulations or relevant telecommunications codes to ACMA. (See s.12.)\n\n- Repeals the earlier 2007 Determination and comes into force the day after registration on the Federal Register of Legislation. (See front matter, s.2, s.4.)\n\nWho it affects\n\n- Individuals and businesses that are \"relevant account‑holders\" for Australian numbers (they can register, correct or remove numbers; see s.7–s.10).\n- Nominees authorised by relevant account‑holders (subject to tighter limits and ACMA approval for some methods; see s.7(5)–(6), s.8(3)–(6), s.10(3)–(7)).\n- Telemarketers, businesses and others who must check the Register before making unsolicited calls — their ability to comply depends on the access methods the ACMA publishes. (Indirect effect: see s.7(9) requiring ACMA to advise whether a number is registered.)\n- A contracted service provider (if used): the Determination assigns operational duties to the contractor, including handling complaints and maintaining the Register (see s.7 notes, s.12).\n\nWhy it matters (stated purpose and practical implications)\n\n- Stated/obvious purpose: to set clear administrative rules for how the Do Not Call Register is run and how people interact with it (applications, corrections, removals, complaint handling). The Determination translates the Act's permissions into concrete procedures. (See s.3 and Parts 2.)\n\n- Implementation and compliance trade‑offs:\n  - Costs to individuals and small businesses: the Determination waives fees for registration, correction and removal (see notes in s.7(8), s.8(5) notes, s.10(8) notes), so direct monetary cost is nil. However, there is an administrative compliance cost to follow ACMA‑approved procedures and to provide information the ACMA reasonably requires (see s.7(7), s.8(5), s.10(7)).\n  - Burden on large commercial callers: the Determination governs how they can check the Register; where bulk checks require ACMA approval to use certain methods (telephone/post/fax/e‑mail), this may add process friction for businesses that routinely cleanse call lists (see s.7(4), s.10(6)).\n  - Centralised discretion: ACMA decides and publishes which application methods are approved (repeated across s.7, s.8, s.10). That concentrates operational choice with ACMA and creates a single point of implementation risk (if ACMA delays publishing procedures, users have restricted options).\n  - Privacy and data risk: the ACMA or contracted provider must handle personal/number data and are bound by the Privacy Act 1988 (noted several times, e.g. s.7(8) note 2), so data handling obligations attach to ACMA and the contractor.\n  - Error‑correction route: ACMA/contracted provider may proactively check and correct entries (s.9); this reduces the need for parties to litigate over incorrect listings but creates a risk of administrative removals or corrections if ACMA misidentifies the relevant account‑holder (s.9(2), s.11(2)).\n\nWho pays, who decides, and what behaviour changes\n\n- Who pays: No fee is payable for registration, correction or removal (notes in s.7(8), s.8(5), s.10(8)). Administrative costs are borne by ACMA and its contractor, and by private parties who must supply required information and follow procedures.\n- Who decides: The ACMA (or the contracted service provider as directed by ACMA) decides operational matters: which application methods are approved, what written procedures applicants must follow, whether a number is ineligible and should be removed, and how complaints are routed (see s.7(2)/(7), s.8(5), s.11(1), s.12).\n- Behaviour changes required: relevant account‑holders or their nominees must use ACMA‑approved channels and follow prescribed procedures to register, check, correct or remove numbers; commercial callers must use the Register access methods that exist to check numbers before making calls (the Act requires checking; this Determination specifies how). Contracted providers (if used) must operate and handle complaints under rules set here.\n\nRisks, incentives and likely side effects (concrete mechanisms)\n\n- Concentration of operational discretion with ACMA reduces uncertainty where ACMA publishes clear procedures; but it creates implementation risk if ACMA delays approval/publication of methods or changes procedures frequently (see repeated ACMA‑approval provisions in s.7, s.8, s.10).\n- The requirement that some methods (especially for bulk applications and nominees) need prior ACMA approval may slow high‑volume users and increase administrative overhead for businesses performing large list updates (s.7(4), s.8(4), s.10(6)).\n- Delegation to a contracted service provider centralises day‑to‑day tasks (s.12) and can reduce ACMA’s direct operating cost, but shifts operational risk and privacy obligations to the contractor (the Determination notes both ACMA and contractor are bound by the Privacy Act; see s.7(8) note 2 and similar notes elsewhere).\n- Removal of ineligible numbers on ACMA satisfaction (s.11) means entries can be removed without the registrant’s affirmative consent; ACMA must make reasonable efforts to notify the relevant account‑holder but is not required to obtain confirmation. That speeds correction of ineligible entries but creates a risk of mistaken removals if identification is unclear.\n\nRelevant sections cited: s.5 (definitions), s.7–s.11 (application, correction, removal rules), s.12 (contracted provider complaint handling)."},"kimi_summary":{"content_quality":"ok","complexity_score":4,"scope_assessment":{"changed":false,"description":"The legislation remains tightly focused on its original purpose: operational procedures for the Do Not Call Register. It replaces the 2007 version with updated administrative processes but does not expand beyond the core function of managing Register entries."},"complexity_factors":["Multiple nested conditional restrictions on application methods (sections 7-10) with different rules for: account-holders vs nominees, bulk vs single applications, fax vs non-fax numbers","Repeated cross-references to external websites for current approved procedures rather than setting fixed rules in the instrument itself","7 defined terms in section 5 plus 7 imported definitions from the parent Act via note","Conditional logic requiring ACMA approval for various methods, with that approval to be published on websites (dynamic, non-legislative content)","Mirror structure across sections 7, 8, and 10 with slight variations creating redundancy but also subtle differences","Multiple notes referencing external legislation (Privacy Act 1988, Criminal Code, Telecommunications Act 1997)"],"plain_english_summary":"This law lays out the practical rules for running the Do Not Call Register: who may add or remove numbers, how registrations and bulk applications are made, special handling for fax numbers, privacy safeguards, error-correction and complaint handling, and that services are free. \n\nIt affects individuals who want fewer telemarketing calls, businesses that must screen numbers before calling, and the ACMA and any contracted operator — it’s the procedural framework that makes the Register work."}},"importantCases":[],"_links":{"self":"/api/acts/do-not-call-register-administration-and-operation-determination-2017","history":"/api/acts/do-not-call-register-administration-and-operation-determination-2017/history","analysis":"/api/acts/do-not-call-register-administration-and-operation-determination-2017/analysis","conflicts":"/api/acts/do-not-call-register-administration-and-operation-determination-2017/conflicts","importantCases":"/api/acts/do-not-call-register-administration-and-operation-determination-2017/important-cases","documents":"/api/acts/do-not-call-register-administration-and-operation-determination-2017/documents"}}